Sunday, October 11, 2009

Broadcast Problems Today



In A.D. 2101
War was beginning.
Captain: What happen ?
Mechanic: Somebody set up us the bomb.
Operator: We get signal.
Captain: What !
Operator: Main screen turn on.
Captain: It's you !!
CATS: How are you gentlemen !!
CATS: All your base are belong to us.
CATS: You are on the way to destruction.
Captain: What you say !!
CATS: You have no chance to survive make your time.
CATS: Ha ha ha ha ....
Operator: Captain !! *
Captain: Take off every 'ZIG'!!
Captain: You know what you doing.
Captain: Move 'ZIG'.
Captain: For great justice.

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The Eighteenth Sunday after Trinity":

Wondering whether anyone else encountered the very great problems I did when trying to log onto the live Divine Service broadcast on the BETHANY CHURCH website ?

The site indicated no live Service was being broadcast.

Try though I did many many times, participation was impossible.

Was Divine Service not held ? (Glad Pastor J also posts his Sermons on Ichabod.

Anonymous

---

On April 1, 2003, in Sturgis, Michigan, seven people aged 17 to 20 placed signs all over town that read, "All your base are belong to us. You have no chance to survive make your time." They claimed to be playing an April Fool's joke, but most people who saw the signs were unfamiliar with the phrase. Many residents were upset that the signs appeared while the U.S. was at war with Iraq, and police chief Eugene Alli said the signs could be "a borderline terrorist threat depending on what someone interprets it to mean."[4]

***

GJ - Either the Ustream server had problems or possibly the site was trying to get my computer to install a new version of Flash during the service. Some viewers saw the live service until the communion distribution.

Robert E. Lee Remembered



General Robert E. Lee


The General Lee


The headline from a Richmond newspaper read, quote;

“News of the death of Robert E. Lee, beloved chieftain of the Southern army, whose strategy mainly was responsible for the surprising fight staged by the Confederacy, brought a two-day halt to Richmond's business activities.” unquote

The United States flag, which Robert E. Lee had defended as a soldier, flew at half mast in Lexington, Virginia and throughout the USA.

General Lee died at his home at Lexington, Virginia at 9:30 AM on Wednesday, October 12, 1870. His last great deed came after the War Between the States when he accepted the presidency of Washington College, now Washington and Lee University. He saved the financially troubled college and helped many young folks further their education.

Some write that Robert E. Lee suffered a cerebral hemorrhage on September 28, 1870, but was thought to greatly improve until October 12th, when he took a turn for the worse. His condition seemed more hopeless when his doctor told him, "General you must make haste and get well---Traveller---has been standing too long in his stable and needs exercise."

Virginia Military Institute (VMI) Cadet William Nalle said in a letter home to his mother, dated October 16, 1870, quote;

“I suppose of course that you have all read full accounts of Gen Lee's death in the papers. He died on the morning of the 12th at about half past nine. All business was suspended at once all over the country and town, and all duties, military and academic suspended at the Institute, and all the black crape and all similar black material in Lexington, was used up at once, and they had to send on to Lynchburg for more. Every cadet had black crape issued to him, and an order was published at once requiring us to wear it as a badge of mourning for six months.” unquote

Read entire letter on Virginia Military Institute website at:

http://www.vmi.edu/archives.aspx?id=5517

The rains and flooding were the worse of Virginia's history on the day General Lee died. On Wednesday, October 12, 1870, in the presence of his family, Lee quietly passed away.

The church bells rang as the sad news passed through Washington College, Virginia Military Institute, the town of Lexington and the nation. Cadets from VMI College carried the remains of the old soldier to Lee Chapel where he laid in state.

Memorial meetings were held throughout the South and as far North as New York. At Washington College in Lexington eulogies were delivered by: Reverend Pemberton, Reverend W.S. White--Stonewall Jackson's Pastor and Reverend J. William Jones. Former Confederate President Jefferson Davis brought the eulogy in Richmond, Virginia. Lee was also eulogized in Great Britain.

When all settled down, Mrs. Robert E. Lee said, "If he had succeeded in gaining by the sword all the South expected and hoped for, he could not have been more honored and lamented."

Many thousands witnessed Lee's funeral procession marching through the town of Lexington, Virginia, with muffled drums and the artillery firing as the hearse was driven to the school's chapel where he was buried.

US President Dwight D. Eisenhower knew and appreciated our nation’s rich history. President Eisenhower was criticized for displaying a portrait of Robert E. Lee in his office. This was part of his response; quote "Robert E. Lee was, in my estimation, one of the supremely gifted men produced by this nation." unquote

Robert E. Lee was the hero of the Southern people and admired both North and South of the Mason-Dixon Line. This Christian- gentleman's last words were, "Strike the Tent."

There will be a Remembering Robert E. Lee Program at Lee Chapel on Monday, October 12, 2009. For details go to:

http://chapelapps.wlu.edu/tertiary.asp?ID=40&Parent=43&NavOrder=1


The Eighteenth Sunday after Trinity




Book cover art by Norma Boeckler



The Eighteenth Sunday after Trinity

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn #528:1-7 If God Himself Be for Me 4.49
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual 1 Cor. 1:4-9
The Gospel Matthew 22:34-46
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #528:8-15 If God Himself Be for Me 4.49

This Is My Body

The Hymn #378 All That I Was 4.4
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #659 Feed Thy Children 4.23

Eighteenth Sunday After Trinity
Lord God, heavenly Father: We are poor, miserable sinners; we know Thy will, but cannot fulfill it because of the weakness of our flesh and blood, and because our enemy, the devil, will not leave us in peace. Therefore we beseech Thee, shed Thy Holy Spirit in our hearts, that, in steadfast faith, we may cling to Thy Son Jesus Christ, find comfort in His passion and death, believe the forgiveness of sin through Him, and in willing obedience to Thy will lead holy lives on earth, until by Thy grace, through a blessed death, we depart from this world of sorrow, and obtain eternal life, through Thy Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

This Is My Body

KJV Matthew 26:26 And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body. 27 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; 28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

The Sacraments of Holy Baptism and Holy Communion were given to the Church, not as something new, but based upon God’s gracious work with the People of God from the beginning.

The more we understand Biblical Judaism, the more we appreciate Christianity.

God’s promises and actions are connected with visible signs we can remember. For example, God promised never again to destroy the earth with a global flood. He gave proof of that promise with the rainbow.

KJV Genesis 9:11 And I will establish my covenant with you; neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth. 12 And God said, This is the token of the covenant which I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations: 13 I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth. 14 And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: 15 And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. 16 And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.

The rainbow is also in Revelation:

KJV Revelation 4:3 And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone: and there was a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald.

Many people like to say what God could do, without looking at what God has done and continues to do.

There is complete continuity between the Old Testament sacraments and those of the New Testament. Removing or hiding the sacraments is the same as denying the revelation of the Old Testament.

In the apostolic era, which we are studying with the Epistle to the Galatians, the Scriptures were simply the Old Testament. Lenski thinks Galatians was the first Pauline epistle, before Thessalonians, and most assume the Gospels came later.

That does not mean that Christians invented the New Testament. The Pauline letters, inspired by the Holy Spirit, circulated among the Christian churches. For the Gospels they had the preaching of the Apostles. Unlike today, people had the capacity to memorize and recite entire books, so this was another way to circulate the Apostolic teaching when the disciples were not present.

As I mentioned before, the first task of every new Christian congregation was to obtain a copy of the Old Testament. That was their first unit, the foundation of all their preaching work. Jewish Christians naturally wanted to hear how Jesus fulfilled all the Old Testament promises. Gentile Christians needed to learn the details so they could see that their Savior was promised at the beginning of time.

The first Gospel Promise:
KJV Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

So Christian worship was directly connected with the Old Testament promises and sacraments.

All those sacraments were meant to train people to understand and expect the Sacraments of Holy Baptism and Holy Communion.

For example, the rainbow is still our common reminder of that promise in Genesis. When we see that rainbow, it should remind us of God always keeping His Promises. It is not just the threat of a global flood, but all the Promises we should remember.

KJV Genesis 15:1 After these things the word of the LORD came unto Abram in a vision, saying, Fear not, Abram: I am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward.

KJV Psalm 37:25 I have been young, and now am old; yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread.

KJV Isaiah 41:10 Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness.

KJV Matthew 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

One way to find the Promises of God is to look up “fear not.” Fear is the opposite of faith, and fear is best countered by the Promises of God. Another way is to find the Gospel sections of the Old Testament, which are abundant. One of the most uplifting sections of the Bible is Isaiah 40ff.

Who Needs Sacraments?
The issue is not whether God needs sacraments, which is supposedly an argument against them. The sacraments are God’s will, which we cannot dispute.

The term itself is shorthand for God’s Promise connected with something visible. The rainbow is certainly a sacrament in that sense.

Mothers spray water into a room to scare monsters away. It is easy to tell children abstractly, “There are no monsters in there,” but it is easier to have a visible sign that a room is monster-proof. Children go through a stage where they imagine these monsters, later adopting the same monsters as their friends. In the meantime, mothers offer a visible sign and children are satisfied with it. From the perspective of the skeptics, this is no good because mothers do not need to spray water. But mothers know the reason is that children need the visible sign. Similarly, when children are anxious about Mom being gone a few hours, an old purse hanging on a hook is used to say, “This means I will be back in a few hours.”

Old Testament Sacraments
The Jews would never have left Egypt without the constant leadership of Moses and the terror of the Pharaoh. Even with a series of miracles, they were often struck with anxiety. So God gave them a pillar of fire at night and a cloud by day. The miraculous activity they enjoyed all prefigured the promised Messiah.

To this day, the Passover Meal foreshadows the Christ. The spotless lamb is sacrificed to remember the Angel of Death passing over them, as long as blood marked the doorways. Wine and unleavened bread are basic to the Passover. Many churches use wine that says in Hebrew – Kosher for Passover.

The Apostle Paul, given the direct revelation of the Gospel, preached the Exodus as foreshadowing Christ and including the pre-Incarnate Son of God –

KJV 1 Corinthians 10:4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.

The Apostle John recorded that Jesus preached on the meaning of one episode in the Exodus.

KJV John 3:14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: 15 That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

One of my battles with the Shrinkers in WELS concerned the liturgy. DP Robert Mueller claimed that the liturgy was invented in the Middle Ages, meaning it could be ejected from the worship service. Doubtless a liturgy-hating graduate of Fuller Seminary taught Mueller that great insight. Luther noted that Roman Catholic hating Protestants are like the man who defended his brother by stabbing at an attacking bear and killing his own brother by mistake. They think by attacking what they believe is Roman, they will defeat Romanism. Thus the liturgy, Creeds, baptismal regeneration, infant baptism, and the sacrament of Holy Communion are all condemned as Roman errors or Medieval traditions. This is bigoted and ignorant, from Zwingli, the self-taught theologian, who has many followers in the Lutheran Church today.

I brought this anti-liturgical bigotry up to a Jew who became a Missouri Synod pastor. I had attended a number of Jewish services, including a bar mitzvah. I was always impressed with the connection between Old Testament worship and the historical liturgy (which is not just Lutheran). I asked this Jewish Lutheran, “How can anyone deny the Jewish liturgical foundation for the apostolic era?” He laughed in response. It was not even debatable. The early Christians saw and understood, if they were Jewish, that they had been preparing for the Messiah since that first Promise, when the orchard thieves were expelled from the Garden of Eden. They carried over the liturgical tradition and enhanced it with the complete revelation of the Gospel.

Non-Jews were introduced to all those ancient actions and Promises, so they could see that they were not joining something newly invented by man (like all the fertility rites) but something revealed by God in the beginning.

Old Testament worship is always connected with something visible. The Torah scrolls are taken out and carried among the people during a Bar Mitzvah service, when a boy becomes a man and reads Hebrew in public.

Jewish worship garments are not confined to a business suit (Time of Gath). Traditional rabbis do not wear a Hawaiian shirt to lead a service (Community of Joy, ex-ELCA).

Old Testament worship, includes the visible with actions. God commanded these aspects of worship so people would see, experience, and remember. People do this today, apart from religious observance. Soldiers fire guns at funerals. If it is an Air Force funeral, the pilots fly the Missing Man formation.

In reliving the events of the Passover Meal, the Lord’s Supper connects the Exodus with the fulfilled promises of Jesus as the Messiah.

So we look at Holy Communion, not as rationalists who judge the Word of God, but as believers who realize God commands what is good and useful for us.

Paul’s epistles assume knowledge of the Gospels, which were preached among the people by the still-living Apostles, including Paul himself. And yet he also included the Words of Institution in his letter to the Corinthians.

The universal language of the Roman Empire was Greek. It was like English today. People spoke their own languages and dialects, but the prestige language, which united all the provinces, was Greek. The only records we have of the Last Supper are Greek, where Jesus clearly says two things essential in the Sacrament:

1. This is my Body. This is my Blood. His Word consecrated the elements, even before the crucifixion. The time element is divine. Abraham and others were justified by faith before the Atonement, receiving in faith the righteousness promised by God.

Jesus words mean that His body is truly present, His blood is truly present. To reduce these words to symbols alone is to deny the Word of God.

Those who say, “We do not know the moment of consecration” are idiots who do not understand the most basic foundation of the Word – God’s Word is effective. In the Absolution, do we not know when sins are absolved? In Holy Baptism, do we not know the Moment of Baptism? Perhaps the baby is truly baptized only when handed back, crying, to his mother.

The power of the Sacrament is in the Word. It is like the red glow of a metal wire heated up by a flame. That wire will start a fire, but no one thinks the wire alone did it. It is the energy within that wire. (Energy is the English transliteration of the NT word group – efficacious, efficaciously, effective, at work, etc).
2. Given for you, for the forgiveness of sin. This makes the Holy Communion a sacrament, not an ordinance. A sacrament means that God conveys what is promised. Sins are forgiven through Holy Communion. Those who deny this and make this an “ordinance” (law) are apostates who refuse to accept the grace freely offered in the Means of Grace.

No shock here – when Lutherans deny the sacraments, they also hide the sacraments, so people will join them and pay them money, without the scandal of God at work effectively through the Instruments (Means) of Grace.

No matter what man will say in denial, God’s promises are true. They are also effective. If we wage war against the Word, we harden our hearts by our own actions, but that is because God’s Word is so powerful. The more we deny the truth, the more we blind ourselves and harden our hearts against the truth.

One man demonstrated that kind of power in a different way. He decided. as a worker on high power lines, to take off his huge gloves for a minute. He had to grab something and literally burnt both arms off – lucky to survive at all. His lectures on safety, to say the least, were quite effective in his new career.

Those who corrupt and adulterate the Word of God are corrupted by their opposition and act out their doctrinal apostasy in various self-destructive ways. Walther himself pointed out that they lose faith first, then commit carnal sins so obvious that they are shunned by everyone. The first stage is doubt, then opposition, and finally serving Satan and murdering souls. My own private opinion is that many TV ministers begin with certain ideals but became truly Satanic in their demeanor and doctrine by constantly embracing what their Father Below promised Christ in the temptations – “bow down and worship me, and all this will be yours.” I see in the worst of them a Satanic anger and glee, as if they are saying, “No one can touch me and my vast empire.”

Humbling experiences point us back to the Word and the source of the grace God has promised us.

In Holy Communion we are reliving the Last Supper and remembering the crucifixion, as God intended. We do not merely talk about forgiveness but receive the visible Word individually, so we cannot possibly ignore what is being said and taught.

Holy Communion takes away our sin. The Gospel heals us and strengthens us against temptation. The very act of forgiveness reminds us of our daily need for this taking away of our sin.

In justification by faith, we realize what God does for us through the Gospel. When we justify ourselves by our works, we deny the Gospel and lose all sense of gratitude toward God.

Holy Communion teaches us that the Christian faith is the only religion where God gives to us rather than demanding from us.

JUSTIFYING FAITH

"But when we are speaking of the subject itself, it is certain that the doctrine of gracious reconciliation, of the remission of sins, of righteousness, salvation, and eternal life through faith for the sake of the Mediator is one and the same in the Old and in the New Testament. This is a useful rule which we must retain at all costs: The doctrine, wherever we read it, in either the Old or New Testament, which deals with the gracious reconciliation and the remission of sins through faith for the sake of God's mercy in Christ, is the Gospel."
Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1989, II, p. 459.

"Therefore God, 'who is rich in mercy' [Ephesians 2:4], has had mercy upon us and has set forth a propitiation through faith in the blood of Christ, and those who flee as suppliants to this throne of grace He absolves from the comprehensive sentence of condemnation, and by the imputation of the righteousness of His Son, which they grasp in faith, He pronounces them righteous, receives them into grace, and adjudges them to be heirs of eternal life. This is certainly the judicial meaning of the word 'justification,' in almost the same way that a guilty man who has been sentenced before the bar of justice is acquitted."
Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 1989, II, p. 482.

"Yet these exercises of faith always presuppose, as their foundation, that God is reconciled by faith, and to this they are always led back, so that faith may be certain and the promise sure in regard to these other objects. This explanation is confirmed by the brilliant statement of Paul in 2 Corinthians 1:20: 'All the promises of God in Christ are yea and amen, to the glory of God through us,' that is, the promises concerning other objects of faith have only then been ratified for us when by faith in Christ we are reconciled with God. The promises have been made valid on the condition that they must give glory to God through us."
Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 1989, II, p. 495.

"Therefore this apprehension or acceptance or application of the promise of grace is the formal cause or principle of justifying faith, according to the language of Scripture."
Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 2 vols., II, p. 502.

"We must note the foundations. For we are justified by faith, not because it is so firm, robust, and perfect a virtue, but because of the object on which it lays hold, namely Christ, who is the Mediator in the promise of grace. Therefore when faith does not err in its object, but lays hold on that true object, although with a weak faith, or at least tries and wants to lay hold on Christ, then there is true faith, and it justifies. The reason for this is demonstrated in those lovely statements in Philippians 3:12: 'I apprehend, or rather I am apprehended by Christ' and Galatians 4:9: 'You have known God, or rather have been known by God.' Scripture shows a beautiful example of this in Mark 9:24: 'I believe; help my unbelief.'"
Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 2 vols., II, p. 503. Philippians 3:12; Galatians 4:9; Mark 9:24.

"For we are not justified because of our faith (propter fidem), in the sense of faith being a virtue or good work on our part. Thus we pray, as did the man in Mark 9:24: 'I believe, Lord; help my unbelief'; and with the apostles: 'Lord, increase our faith,' Luke 17:5."
Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 2 vols., II, p. 506. Mark 9:24; Luke 17:5.

"But because not doubt but faith justifies, and not he who doubts but he who believes has eternal life, therefore faith teaches the free promise, which relies on the mercy of God for the sake of the sacrifice of the Son, the Mediator, and not on our works, as Paul says in Romans 4:16: 'Therefore it is of faith, that the promise might be sure according to grace.'"
Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, 2 vols., II, p. 507. Romans 4:16

"Thus when we say that we are justified by faith, we are saying nothing else than that for the sake of the Son of God we receive remission of sins and are accounted as righteous. And because it is necessary that this benefit be taken hold of, this is said to be done 'by faith,' that is, by trust in the mercy promised us for the sake of Christ. Thus we must also understand the correlative expression, 'We are righteous by faith,' that is, through the mercy of God for the sake of His Son we are righteous or accepted."
Melanchthon, Loci Communes, “The Word Faith.” Cited in Martin Chemnitz, Loci Theologici, II, p. p. 489.


Saturday, October 10, 2009

Going Galt, We Bought the Ichaboat from the Duggars



1994 Lincoln Town Car


This area, Northwest Arkansas, is considered retirement paradise. We are surrounded by golf courses, hunting and fishing.

Our car lease was up when we moved, so we looked briefly at buying the car. The dealership gave us a page to look at, and we saw a lot of payments ahead. For the initial cost of taking that car back (add on fees - $800), we put a down payment on the car pictured above.

Mrs. Ichabod wanted to look at cars once we got to Arkansas, so we soon went to the used car lot run by Josh and Anna Duggar. We met Josh first. His brother John worked on the purchase papers. Josh's father Jim Bob stopped in and said hello. Later, Josh's wife Anna finished the purchase, her sister watching, and baby MacKynzie Renee Duggar bearing silent witness. MacKynzie was named but not yet born. My wife wanted to bring a baby present to the close, but I suggested they were on a tight schedule and soon to be inundated with baby gifts.

As suggested by a car expert, we took the car to a good mechanic for an exam. His response was, "For that price, I would buy it. We love Lincolns." The check-up cost was $34. Prices are low in Arkansas.

Anna told me, without sounding ominous, that her brother-in-law John was in charge of repos. I said, "He mentioned that too. I suggested combining two reality shows, with all the Duggars showing up with a muscular gang to repo a car." John loved the idea, but Anna was in a hurry, since she and her sister were on their way to a baby shower.

The Duggars are well known, respected, and loved in the area. We were in a nutrition store when one woman looked at our car, dubbed the Ichaboat, and said, "That looks like Josh's grandfather's car." It may have been. The previous owner had it for one year. Mrs. Ichabod is sure the car now has a pedigree.

By going Galt, we got a rust-free reliable car that will be paid off in one year, no interest. The battle cruiser size means we can emulate the carbon footprint of John Kerry and Al Gore.

PS - Going Galt means looking for ways to donate less revenue to the government while having a more satisfying life. A+ wanted to know if it meant not working, but I take it to mean being more frugal about every purchase. Property owns us, as we learn when moving books or anything else. We can get by on less, especially when the most valuable things cost nothing.

KJV Matthew 6:31 Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? 32 (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. 33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. 34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.

Friday, October 9, 2009

Someone Who Earned a Nobel Prize




Such irony today - Norman Teigen just wrote about Norman Borlaug on his blog, a man who earned the Nobel Prize. Teigen has a number of posts on the topic. I suggest looking up Borlaug's information and what he did to fight world hunger.

PS - Someone did not get the humor in my PhotoShop above. Norman identifies himself as someone with many hobbies, something easily discerned from his blog. "I am a retired Viet-Nam veteran. I am involved in about 12 volunteer projects." It helps to read before commenting - but that never stops a Shrinker.

Tragically, I have had to block a lot of comments from Shrinkers, due to the obscene language of the Chicaneries. On the plus side, I know I am hitting the target when the chicken feathers fly.


Thursday, October 8, 2009

Your Lutheran ID Key




In 1977, certain WELS leaders declared war on Lutheran doctrine with the publication of TELL. Thirty-two years later, the same liars are pretending nothing has happened. Unfortunately for them, their boasting and preening is all over the Internet and on TV. They can shred reputations while crying Eighth Commandment and Matthew 18, but they cannot make all the Shrinker articles in FIC (nee Northwestern Lutheran) go away. They cannot make the Evangelism notebooks disappear.

The Shrinkers used to be crypto-Growthers. But the Emerging Church types like Ski, Doebler, Gunn, and Hunter cannot stop blabbing about the Enthusiasts they love, follow, adore, and emulate. They twitter and tweet and run off to the next conference. Bishop Katie cannot help raving about all the WELS guys at the Andy Stanley Babtist Cheerleader Academy, and Ski has to blog about it - with photos!

"Sir, there is no evidence. I erased the link."

"Fool! A doctor of divinity kept the link and Ichabod posted everything. Someone even downloaded all your photos. From now on, we poop and scoot. No evidence left."

"Yes, Don."

"Yes, Don, SIR!"

"Sir, yes, SIR!"


Doctrinal Pussycat Hairballs






DP David Rutschow


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Time of Gath - Is Jeske a Christian?":

In WELSdom, it's supposed to be the duty of the district presidents to uphold doctrine and practice within their respective districts. Jeske is SE Wisconsin District--WELS. David Rutschow is DP of SE Wisconsin District--WELS. Will Rutschow hold Jeske's feet to the fire? Hold not your breath! Witness how the pattern of foolishness at WLC (Marty (ELCA), Weakland (RC), Kaiser (Reformed)has gone on without any real corrective discipline. The COP had to formulate its infamous "outside the framework of fellowship" canon to mollify confessional types while at the same time opening up a loophole for the Shrinkers. So, Jeske makes nice with the S. Wis. LC-MS in convention and discourses at Concordia-Mequon. WELS principles of fellowship and unionism can no longer be taken seriously when DP's fail to address this stuff.

***

GJ - DP Robert Mueller (1980s) approved all the CG stuff, and defended CG projects. He finally said there was something doctrinally wrong with CG in a newsletter but supported soon after - the creation of CrossRoads Evangelical Covenant Church: Rick Miller, Mark Freier, Kelly Voigt.

Aiding and abetting the Shrinker movement has been the attitude that WELS can do no wrong. Anyone who objects is guilty of the Only Sin in WELS - saying WELS is imperfect.

Shrinkers have used Christian News to advance their agenda too, and Otten has been glad to oblige.

Devilish Details


Anonymous
Megatron database has need of slight adjusting... Satan never ever gets put to "Right". The study of God's Word puts him to "Flight".

***

GJ - I kelmed the error directly from the bookofconcord.org website:

"102] And even though no other interest or necessity impel us, yet this ought to urge every one thereunto, because thereby the devil is put to Right and driven away, and, besides, this commandment is fulfilled, and [this exercise in the Word] is more pleasing to God than any work of hypocrisy, however brilliant."

Megatron has been slandered, with secondary violation of Matthew 18! I checked my database and it is correct on this quotation. It is easier to kelm from the website. I admit to parlowing, too. I do not always give credit to that website. I am glad to do it now, to point the finger.

First German, Manitowoc Buying Boilerplate from Kelm and Perish Services




Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Time of Gath - Is Jeske a Christian?":

This just in from the Ichabod News Network.

First German, Manitowoc, WI has been undergoing restructuring under the auspices of Parish Services and lead by visiting counselor Paul Kelm. Round one started in January with all the charts and graphs showing the decline of membership. Funny, after having two pastors and a pastor of Hmong outreach, they are still having a problem of growth. There should be many times each week where the Law and Gospel is proclaimed. Let the results be up to the Lord.

But the hand wringing has successfully been started and the next stages are ready for implementation. It's too bad there are no leaders in the congregation who can see this for what it is and stand up and so NO, we will not let our church become destroyed with the allurements of success at all costs.

First German, you are not on "life support", you never were and you should know what the Means of Grace are and should rely on them solely.

Carry your Gospel of the cross, not of Glory.

***

GJ - I was told Kelm would be gone by the end of September. His initial hiring and continued employment shows how the Shrinkers are still controlling The Love Shack.

Pastor David D. Rosenow is the senior pastor at this congregation. I wonder how much the congregation is paying for Perish Services boilerplate. If there are tons of statistics to gather (as suggested by Kent Hunter, DMin Fuller), I am guessing Kelm did not do the work but told the parish to do it.

Not to worry folks - the Doctrinal Pussycats are now supervising Perish Services. They are the same men who watched as CrossWalk (non-WELS) got three men installed at Wisconsin Lutheran College leaders: president and two board members.

It's your money at work. As Luther said, "They won't give Christ a dollar but they gladly give Satan $100." Imagine the same parish leaders giving up that much money to put a kid through college and seminary.


Wednesday, October 7, 2009

The Ex of a WELS Pastor Writes



GA at work, again?


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "All Divorced WELS Pastors Have "Scriptural" Divorc...":

I was previously married to a WELS pastor who after years of emotional, spiritual, and physical abuse (not to mention constant pressure to file for divorce) I filed mostly to show him I had a spine after all. He took everything I owned and called everyone in the synod to tell them I had been unfaithful, had an abortion, was a drug addict, etc., etc. I was facing excommunication - he moved onto a call where he was doing marital counseling (and even told me to not call him because he was fearful his now girlfriend would be upset with him talking to me). He has since remarried and I tried to raise awareness of the case to the circuit pastor and president of the synod, but I continually was admonished without audience or explanation. All I can say is it seemed clear they did not care about hearing the truth but instead chose to protect their investment. Suffice to say, I am no longer WELS.

Time of Gath - Is Jeske a Christian?



Jeske's message today bordered on the occult.
Forget Kieschnick - welcome Napoleon Hill. Set yourself down ri-chere, Napoleon.


Church and Chicanery reminds me of Skull and Bones at Yale, but without the glamor. Both are secret societies where the best evidence of influence comes from tracing the network of leaders.

Various people and Google have helped me see how Church and Chicanery gradually took over WELS, with the help of Mischke and Gurgle, until their apostate guidance was overthrown (partially) by electing SP Mark Schroeder. The 2009 WELS convention confirmed how little the membership cherished the decades of doctrinal error and unashamed unionism.

Mark Jeske is obviously one of the main leaders of Church and Change today. All the threads lead back to him and a few other leaders - the Appleton gang and the Don Patterson network, plus WLCFS.

The message we watched today was another treat for people with attention deficit problems. Back and forth, from the church to the office, Jeske spoke about Paul. That is typical Reformed sermonizing - avoiding the Gospel of Christ to speak about Biblical figures as examples to follow. Paul's suffering was compared to individual suffering today and rated with metallic standards, from aluminum to platinum. Sure enough, I found a "platinum level of suffering" on the Net - from another Reformed minister. Funny how Mark and this minister both came up with the exact same term, which Jeske called his own.

The most disturbing part of this message came when Jeske spoke about prayer as "using the power of the universe" to help us in personal matters and in business. That language is right from Napoleon Hill (occult) and Paul Y. Cho (occultic ex Assemblies of God minister, Korea). Norman Vincent Peale kelmed the same concept from an occult author. No surprise - Peale still appeals to WELS.

Jeske also invoked UOJ terms, saying that the resurrection of Christ "guaranteed our justification." That is from the Walther Easter absolution sermon, the core of Missouri, WELS, and ELS claiming "Everyone in the world was absolved of all sin the moment Christ rose from the dead." I have never found a Church Shrinker deviating from UOJ because Enthusiasts love both aspects of their false doctrine.

Church Growth is so much easier when the Law is obsolete and sin is no longer mentioned. That has also made it so much easier for CG gurus to jump into bed with their eager disciples.

Years ago the Evangelical and Pentecostal CG gurus were veering into the occult. After all, Cho was an honored lecturer at Fuller Seminary. Many Pentecostals today speak the same occultic language as Cho and Peale.

I can understand why the Chicaneries are so arrogant. They have repudiated all their ordination vows but they stay on top, even after episodes of shocking self-destruction. Like Jeske, in his faux-confessions, they admit to being cross at times, but they hate and avoid the cross. They offer glory, success, and the wages for eternity of their Father Below. (See The Pilgrim's Progress, by Bunyan.)

More Reason To Think the Fix Is In:
Wisconsin Lutheran College Board Members



Jeff Gunn--Church and Chicanery idol--
is a pastor who does not offer Holy Communion to a church
that his own district did not accept into WELS.
CrossWalk has two on the board, and the WLC president is from CrossWalk.

Wisconsin Lutheran College (Brigadoon-WELS) Board of Regents

Mr. Gary Drska St. Paul Muskego, Wis.
Mr. Ryan Barbieri Christ Pewaukee, Wis.
Dr. Gerald Fischer Grace Falls Church, Va.
Mr. James Fischer Christ Pewaukee, Wis.
Rev. Kenneth Fisher Risen Savior Milwaukee, Wis.
Mr. Ned Goede Atonement Milwaukee, Wis.
Rev. Jeff Gunn CrossWalk Phoenix, Ariz.
Rev. Mark Henrich Atonement Milwaukee, Wis.
Rev. Dennis Himm Gloria Dei Grand Blanc, Mich.
Mr. Charles Kluenker St. Mark Citrus Heights, Calif.
Mr. Philip Leyrer St. John New Ulm, Minn.
Mr. Scott Mayer Grace Milwaukee, Wis.
Mr. David McCulloch Prince of Peace Traverse City, Mich.
Mr. Kent Raabe Christ the Lord Brookfield, Wis.
Mr. Paul Rosenow Christ the Vine Temecula, Calif.
Mr. C. Daniel Stefferud Gethsemane Los Angeles, Calif.
Rev. Paul Steinberg St. Marcus Milwaukee, Wis.
Mr. Gary Stimac Abiding Word Houston, Texas
Mr. William Treffert Christ Pewaukee, Wis.
Mr. W. Andrew Unkefer CrossWalk Phoenix, Ariz.
Mr. Daryl Weber Bethlehem Menomonee Falls, Wis.
Mr. Mark Wrightsman Christ North St. Paul, Minn.
Mr. George Zaferos St. Luke's Watertown, Wis. 

***

GJ - WLC is Brigagoon-WELS because the school is WELS when raising funds from WELS, but not WELS when getting into trouble for having Archbishop Weakland (Roman Catholic homosexual predator) or Martin Marty (ELCA church historian, LCMS apostate) as featured speakers.

Notice that St. Marcus/Time of Gath is also represented on the board.

Years ago, David Valleskey and Larry Olson (Our Staph Infection) were on the WLC board, so let us not be shocked about WLC's doctrinal fibrillation.

WLC began Charis, and Charis begat Church and Change. Church and Change lay with Fuller Seminary and begat many sons. They named their firstborn Ski and their second Jeff.

Thy Strong Word, Hardcopy


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "UOJ Starting To Fade Somewhat":

Dr. Jackson,

Is "Thy Strong Word" available as a physical book anywhere? I know it is available online, but I always prefer the "real" version.

***

GJ - There might be a copy or two left. I am still unpacking.

Do You Like Rock Bands, Soul Cafes,
and Invitations To "Come to the Lord"?
Thank the First VP of WELS


Fuller-trained First VP Jim Huebner has been at the center of the Shrinker revolution in WELS.
Less obvious, Don Patterson is running for SP in two years, with Gurgle support.


Some people visited a former church somewhere. WELS. Small-town. Big celebration. Loud rock band in the service. Lots of money spent on the church. They now have a soul cafe. Sound familiar? It sounds familiar to Huebner too. He has a soul cafe but pretends to be high church (for WELS, at least).

Everything is adiaphora in WELS. Most of worship is adiaphora, according to SP-in-Waiting Don Patterson's lay leader.

But isn't it a bit Babtist to have the pastor invite people to "Come to the Lord"?

The lack of a robe is just what Mark Jeske models at Time of Gath. Parlow too, except he called it a rob.

Has anyone caught Ski in a robe?

The cancer has jumped from the main centers and traveled into the backwoods. Doctrine is not adiaphora, a matter of indifference, but WELS has been indifferent about doctrine for decades. That is the result or cause of unionism.

Jim Huebner mocked the efficacy of the Word in print, proven with verbatim quotations (cited of course in this blog) and yet was elected to the second highest position in WELS. Perhaps that office is not worth a bucket of warm spit at the moment, but it does show how indifferent WELS can be about the "one thing needful." But - as long as it is glowing and growing... Oh? It isn't? I guess God does not bless those who violate the First Table of the Ten Commandments.

When I wrote about this in the 1980s, I was a "legalist" (Valleskey) and exaggerating.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Gibbon and Matthew 18



Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Learning from Cicero: The Decline and Fall of the ...":

Gibbons.... hmmm...

Of course he was the author whose main premise of the entire work "Decline and Fall..." was that the Christians weakened the Empire -- pacifists, lovers of all people, etc. -- to such an extent that it fell. No friend to Christianity was Gibbons.

***

GJ - Have you actually read Gibbons? I read the entire set twice and repeated some volumes after that. That is definitely the lamest review of Gibbons I have seen, as if a sophomore read some reviews on the Net and decided to parrot them. The main premise of the entire work? Spare me.

UOJ Starting To Fade Somewhat



"The fields are white unto harvest," CG Guru Donald McGavran explained to a star-struck Larry Olson, astride his Schwin bike, "but you must harvest with a sickle, not with a penknife."


Someone asked about Koehler and UOJ. The synodical conference began recycling the same old Pietistic bromides for decades, and that set the stage for the attack on the Bible's authority, unionism, and Church Growth. UOJ is a symptom of Lutheran avoidance or denial of the efficacy of the Word.

Read Reu on Luther and the Scriptures. Reu was dealing with the inerrancy issue, which the proto-LCA leaders were promoting (Franklin C. Fry, ULCA president, then LCA president, LWF president, Mr. Protestant). Inerrancy and efficacy overlap so much that one is necessarily the mother or daughter of the other.

Following Zwingli and Calvin, the Reformed deny the efficacy of the Word but assert its inerrancy - at least, at first. Fuller Seminary, where so many ELCA-LCMS-WELS-ELS pastors studied, began with a weak statement on inerrancy. They up and tossed that out, just when Olson's hero, Donald McGavran, stepped in with his statistics and his famous book, Misunderstanding Church Growth.

Synodical Conference Lutherans felt comfortable studying at Fuller Seminary because Holy Mother Synod failed to teach the efficacy of the Word. Their Pietism gave them all a conjoined status with the Reformed. They shared the same denial of efficacy, just as conjoined twins share a leg, liver, or heart.

How did the Synodical conference invent Receptionism, the cracked notion that the elements of Holy Communion become the Body and Blood of Christ once they are received? (Did they jingle a bell every time someone touched the elements?)

Sig Becker loved Receptionism and UOJ. QED - he pioneered Church Growth at the Sausage Factory.

Robert Preus promoted UOJ and Church Growth at the same time. Unlike his unscholarly sons, he continued to study and repudiated UOJ in his last book. Dan and Rolf are so dense that they edited his book, so we are told, and failed to understand what their daddy wrote.

The same bad theology and lazy exegesis of Receptionism allowed Lutherans to teach, covertly, that everyone in the world was already forgiven, without the efficacious Word: Universal Objective Justification.

How did hundreds of Lutheran clergy listen to marketing advice, without running out the door screaming? The first time I wrote "Questions and Answers about Church Growth" in Christian News, about 100 letters came pouring in, when normally a letter or two was unusual.

Receptionism, UOJ, and Church Growth all represent an implicit denial of the efficacy of the Word. All three are pure Enthusiasm, the separation of the Word from the Holy Spirit, the basis for all false doctrine.

UOJ and Receptionism once had the advantage of being a secretive doctrine known only to clergy. How could anyone remember the idiotic arguments long enough to refute them? That changed when the Internet allowed people to read the offensive arguments 24/7. One pastor said he identified UOJ wrongly with the Atonement and changed his language when he read Chapter Five of Thy Strong Word.

Likewise, the B. Teigen book against Receptionism awakened Lutherans from their doctrinal slumber. The synodical reaction to Teigen's book was just as hostile as WELS-ELS-LCMS reaction to my criticisms of CG doctrine.

When the ELS-WELS leaders said, "We don't know the Moment of Consecration," they should have been drop-kicked into Willow Creek.

That is also why women's ordination is promoted in the ELS, WELS, and LCMS. Given the denial of the Biblical doctrine of the Word, anyone in a robe will do. Fighting against women's ordination is foolish when the same spineless leaders will not fight for the most basic doctrine of the Bible, a doctrine clearly taught by Luther, Chemnitz, and the Book of Concord.

Obama's Book Sounds Just Like Bomber Ayers' Writing, Because...


Obama's Middle Finger, Bomber Bill Ayers,
Bomber Bernadine Dohrn Ayres, Michelle Obama
Another Story Involving Ayres' Confession

There I was, sitting in Reagan National Monday morning, sipping a Starbucks by the United counter before going through security. I had a little time, so I was browsing through the news. Some military guys had borrowed a chair from my table. I looked up from time to time to enjoy the sun streaming through. That's when I saw Bill Ayers, an instant blight. Scruffy, thinning beard, dippy earring, and the wirerims, heading to order. I gathered my things, got my camera ready, and snapped a shot right when he got his coffee.




I asked--what are you doing in D.C. Mr. Ayers?



For a moment I thought he might be on my flight back to Chicago. Charming. Initially I guess he thought I was laying claim to his coffee or something. He gave me an uneasy cheesy smile when he realized I was taking his picture. I asked him if he was speaking at GW? (Only I said GFW, guess I had the VFW on my mind) He said oh you mean GW, he said no...was trying to decide if I was a fan, then said he was giving a lecture in Arlington to a Renaissance group on education--that's what I do, education--you shouldn't believe everything you hear about me, you know nothing about me. I said, I know plenty--I'm from Chicago, a conservative blogger, and I'll post this. (Oh, yeah, Bill Ayers, quite the Renaissance man, nail-bomber extraordinaire. Gee, I see another friend of Barack, U.S. Sec. of Education Arne Duncan was there too. "The conference theme is “A Time for Reflection, Celebration and Rebirth.” How touching. At best, useless, at worst, so wrong.)



Then, unprompted he said--I wrote Dreams From My Father. I said, oh, so you admit it. He said--Michelle asked me to. I looked at him. He seemed eager. He's about my height, short. He went on to say--and if you can prove it, we can split the royalties. So I said, stop pulling my leg. Horrible thought. But he came again--I really wrote it, the wording was similar. I said I believe you probably heavily edited it. He said--I wrote it. I said--why would I believe you, you're a liar.



He had no answer to that. Just looked at me. Then he turned and walked off, and said again his bit about my proving it and splitting the proceeds.



But the question remains--is Barack Obama a fraud? Is his myth-making creation and only major accomplishment a product of Bill Ayers' imagination? (or his own) Is our President Barack Obama's biography written by an unrepentant domestic terrorist?



Perhaps I'll become Bill Ayers' favorite conservative blogger and he can prove his authorship himself--turn over your notes Bill. And how about turning yourself in for your crimes.



I remember that era, Mr. Ayers. People died because of your actions, including your girlfriend. More would have if you had been more successful. And yet you have the gall to teach the teachers of our young. I won't forget your murderous intent, your shameful acts, your contemptible lies and evasions. And when history is written, I hope you'll be reviled--or forgotten.



As for our President, the verdict is still out. But Barack Obama called Bill Ayers friend and colleague for years. That in itself makes a damning statement.



UPDATE: My friend John Ruberry, Marathon Pundit links with remarks. Chicago News Bench links as well. If I ever write a book (of my own), I will love Tom Mannis to do a blurb for the jacket.



UPDATE: Jack Cashill, who first fleshed out the theory that Ayers ghostwrote Obama's book, on the new unofficial bio of Barack and Michelle, at the end of September:



In his new book, "Barack and Michelle: Portrait of an American Marriage," Best-selling celebrity journalist, Christopher Andersen, has blown a huge hole in the Obama genius myth without intending to do so.



Relying on inside sources, quite possibly Michelle Obama herself, Andersen describes how Dreams came to be published -- just as I had envisioned it in my articles on the authorship of Dreams. With the deadline pressing, Michelle recommended that Barack seek advice from "his friend and Hyde Park neighbor Bill Ayers."



Read it all. Cashill's site here. Professor Ron Radosh with comments as well. James Simpson, DC Independent Examiner on the media silence.



UPDATE: Just so readers know, I have been tracking Ayers for some time. I have an MBA from the University of Chicago. I've lived in the Chicago area for 30 years, so I know the Hyde Park and Chicago radical leftie milieu. And I first noted the release of his flag-stomping photo from the Hillary blog back during the campaign. My earliest posts on Ayers: Barack's Bomber Buddy, Taking Stock of Barack: A Radical Primer, Obama Responds on Che Flag, Judging Barack Obama, Clout List: Rezko Realtor on Obama Sale, Ayers-Dohrn SDS Reunion Tapes, Whiner Ayers, Ayers' Murderous Intent, The Trouble with Ayers, Fascist Obama Campaign, Obama's Founding Brothers, Subversives for Obama, Obama Ayers Khalidi

---

 

Bill Ayers claims he wrote Obama's "Dreams From My Father"

In a chance meeting with conservative blogger Anne Leary, Bill Ayers makes a stunning claim that he wrote--not just edited--President Barack Obama's autobiography, Dreams from my Father."

Wow. He makes this claim to a  stranger who approaches him in Reagan National Airport. Can you believe anything this man says? Or, should I say, either man?
Ayers.jpg
Bill Ayers: Obama's ghostwriter?


This is no small matter. We have been lead to believe that Obama's eloquence is his strength, his trump card. Is it possible that all of this is a charade? A gigantic lie?

Does this suggest an answer to the question: Did Obama himself write his keynote speech to the 2004 Democratic convention that shot him into orbit as The One? Does Obama think so much like Ayers that what we've seen coming out of the White House during the first months of the Obama administration is a reflection of Ayers' point of view?

Americans have been more than pummeled during the Clinton, G. W. Bush and now the Obama administrations with charges that the chief executive is a liar. How much longer will this continue?

---

October 07, 2009

Ayers admits writing Dreams

By James Simpson
Last Friday we posted an article on these pages asserting Bill Ayers' authorship of President Barack Obama's 'Dreams From My Father,' based on claims made by Obama biographer Christopher Andersen. It is possible that we have now gotten direct confirmation of this from Bill Ayers himself.

Anne Leary of
Back Yard Conservative was passing through Washington, DC's Reagan National Airport yesterday, and was surprised to come across Bill Ayers at Starbucks: "scruffy, thinning beard, dippy earring, and the wire rims, heading to order."

She struck up a conversation with him and snapped the accompanying photo. (I interviewed Anne about it, and thank her for permission to run the photo she took.)

Ayers was in Washington, he told her, for a 
conference on education.

"That's what I do, education," he said. "You shouldn't believe everything you hear about me... You know nothing about me."

To which she responded, "I said, I know plenty--I'm from Chicago, a conservative blogger, and I'll post this."

I bet his heart skipped a beat on that one.

But he didn't scowl, and didn't
run off as he has been known to do. Instead, unprompted, he blurted out: "I wrote ‘Dreams From My Father... Michelle asked me to." Then he added "And if you can prove it we can split the royalties."

Anne responded, "Stop pulling my leg!"

But he repeated insistently, "I wrote it, the wording was similar [to Ayers' other writing.]"

Anne responded, "I believe you probably heavily edited it."

Ayers stated firmly, "I wrote it."

Anne ended the conversation by saying "why would I believe you? You're a liar."

Good for her. But we are left to wonder. Despite her parting shot, Anne was convinced Ayers was in earnest. He was making a public statement. He wanted this news out there.

Was he, as she had asked, pulling our collective legs? Other sources report rumors that Ayers is very upset both about not getting any credit for helping Obama on ‘Dreams,' and may also be put off by being summarily thrown under the bus along with Rev. Wright and everyone else who becomes an inconvenience to this President.
My understanding of communists is that most would know better and keep their mouths shut. But Ayers is a bit different. He is, as he says, a "
small ‘c' communist," but he is also, in a certain, slimy way, an entrepreneur, as we explained in Monday's post. (Apologies in advance to entrepreneurs everywhere.) He grew up a very rich kid, used to getting everything he wanted. Even as an adult his career has relied on a hand up from his wealthy father. His past statements and radical activities also mark him as a megalomaniac. In youth he drew attention to himself by blowing things up. As an adult "educator" he merely attempts to subvert children. But that doesn't seem to be going so well.

He is under a lot of pressure, too. Ayers and his horrid wife
Bernardine Dohrn are believed to have planned and executed the San Francisco Park Police Station bombing in 1970 that killed police sergeant Brian V. McDonnell and wounded several others. Efforts to bring them to justice have been underway for some time, as brought to light this past March in a National Press Club conference put on by Cliff Kincaid of America's Survival.

Cliff's guests included Larry Grathwohl, the FBI's undercover agent who penetrated Ayers' Weather Underground and produced this stunning testimony about Ayers'
plan to massacre 25 million Americans, retired S.F. policeman James Pera, first on the scene at the bombing, and veteran researcher Trevor Loudon

Now, a
recent exposé by San Francisco reporter Peter Jamison has revealed additional evidence, including testimony from other Weather Underground members, that Dohrn planted the bomb that killed Sgt. McDonnell.

Maybe in his overstressed state Bill's megalomania has just gotten the better of him.

Monday, October 5, 2009

Where Marcus Manthey? Hire Him as Editor!


Rev. John Seifert, president of the Michigan District, says the displaced workers were encouraged to hear that their experiences in ministry have value in and are transferable to the secular market. Still, they face a difficult struggle finding meaningful employment in the Saginaw area where the unemployment rate hovers between 22 and 25 percent.


Seifert expresses thanks for the support from Committee on Relief for the effort. "The counseling would not have been possible with it," he says.

Faux-Reilly Retort





I. J. Reilly has left a new comment on your post "WELS Pastor Answers Home Visiting Issue":

I am a WELS pastor of a small/medium sized congregation. I have been to the homes of most of my members at least once. I regularly visit those who are in special need. I would probably spend a few more evenings visiting, but I have a severely autistic son and I am needed quite a bit at home. I'm not saying this to toot my own horn. I'm saying this because most of the WELS pastors in my area follow the same pattern -- actually, they probably outstrip my efforts. Your characterization has NO BASIS IN REALITY. Why you are this bitter and try to find deficiencies where none exist simply boggle my mind! Actually, I pitty you. (I threw that last spelling error in so that you would publish my comments if only to gloat over your superiority in the use of the English language.)

***

GJ - If this is the same person, or parson, I get a lot of angry comments from him when I criticize the Shrinkers. Of course, there is no way to tell from anonymous messages. It could be another Faux-Reilly.

His WELS region must be exceptional, because I have heard from all over - not just laity. I had a WELS family move from a Minnesota town to Columbus. The husband said he never experienced a WELS pastoral visit in the decade or so he lived in that state. He was astonished that I visited homes.

I gained a wider perspective from a WELS leader who has a position where he would know what is happening in a large region. Sad to say, there are WELS leaders who are quite friendly and they actually identify themselves by their real names. But I digress. This WELS leader said the lack of visitation by pastors is a terrible problem and it exists just as much among the solid, orthodox pastors. He is not a Shrinker fan.

This is what a WELS pastor told me, about 22 years ago, Faux-Reilly. "In Milwaukee the parishes are about one square mile. The pastors can drink all week and preach on Sunday. That is what a lot of them do." I did not accuse him of being angry and bitter.

WELS Pastor Answers Home Visiting Issue


Ron Roth, WELS Stewardship and Church Growth Guru, should help this church get four or five pastors, or waste millions on remodeling the structure. Or start a rock band. That's the ticket.

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "A Home Avoiding Pastor Makes a Church Avoiding Con...":



It saddens and frustrates me to hear people accuse WELS pastors of being unloving and uncaring for not making home visits.



I would ask the people making such accusations to consider things from the other perspective. I can't speak for all WELS pastors, but I can tell you about my situation. I serve a congregation of almost 2000 souls. I literally have a meeting or a group or a class every Monday through Thursday evening. Often times I also have a wedding rehearsal on Friday evening and a wedding on Saturday evening. Most weeks I'm lucky to spend one evening with my wife and kids per week.



I would LOVE to spend my evenings visiting my members rather than listening to the Ladies Aid talk about what kind of coffee to buy or listen to the elders squabble over pennies. But whenever I get the courage to suggest that the pastor might not need to attend every single meeting of every single organization, I'm told that I'm lazy and need to be a better leader and manager of the congregation. Whenever I try to get laymen to assume some leadership to free me up for home visits they tell me they're way too busy to help.



And even if I were to give up everything else in my ministry and visit members at home every single night of the week, every single day of the year, not ever spending a single night with my own family, it would still take almost six years to visit everyone.



Home visits are a wonderful thing in small congregations. But in large congregations like mine, they simply are not logistically possible, especially when congregations are too stingy to have an adequate pastoral staff of 4 or 5 pastors. It's not that I'm lazy, it's not I don't care about my people. It hurts me to hear people accuse me of that when it simply isn't true.
 
****
 
GJ - Two points to consider - very few WELS congregations are that large. The smaller ones have pastors who never visit. I know one where the pastor was begged to bring Holy Communion to a dying member. He finally showed up, without communion. He could have gone home for his kit, but did not. He was known for not visiting members and he was a fanatical partisan for Church Growth.
 
I do not know this pastor or his congregation, so I have to give him the benefit of the doubt. If I could wave a wand, I would say, "Evening meetings begone. Just visit people." I am not sure evening visits need to dominate. Hospital and shut-in visits can be done during the day and they usually are done during the day.
 
Congregations should support more staff, but the stories about pastoral laziness are pretty common. I give all the glory to the Shrinkers who imported management theories and turned pastors into managers. They run the school systems of Missour, WELS, and the Little Sect on the Prairie.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WELS Pastor Answers Home Visiting Issue":

As the pastor who submitted this comment, I can assure you that I do hospital and shut-in visits during the day. That's just a given. But I don't think that was the issue at hand. The issue at hand was home visits, right? Good luck trying to find 90% of your members at home during the day. (I'm lucky to find 90% of my shut-ins at home during the day.)

I get the sense that you think I'm silly for suggesting that a congregation of 2000 should have 4 or 5 pastors. How many pastors do you think a congregation of that size should have? Please tell me you're not like my members who think one (or maybe two) pastor should be able to handle everything since he only works one day a week (if only!). If a congregation of 400 should have one pastor, shouldn't a congregation 5 times as big have a pastoral staff that's 5 times as big?

I also resent your insinuation that I somehow support rock bands or contemporary worship or the like. I can assure you that I am dead set against rubbish like that.

***

GJ - I did not insinuate anything about this pastor. The Shrinkers think the solution is a huge building project and a rock band, dump the liturgy, etc. Ron Roth started that with TELL and continues it with his stewardship business (with Jeff Davis). That is like hiring the founders of  Edsel to start a new car company.

I think a congregation of 2000 souls should have five pastors. If a congregation of 100 - 200 has one pastor, a congregation of 2000 should have many more.

I vicared with a pastor who had a congregation of around 2000. I am not sure about the numbers. He did two services per Sunday and had a German pastor doing weekly German services. He had a church administrator and a vicar. He did not like clergy staff. He had very few evening meetings per month. He visited constantly and made sure his vicars visited five days a week. There were various social type gatherings. What made that work was the close relationships within the congregation, extended families, etc.

Many years ago Father Neuhaus made the point that denominations were using up the trust built up by previous religious leaders. He was an apostate, but he made a good point.

A Home Avoiding Pastor Makes a Church Avoiding Congregation



Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WELS Member Comments":

Gone are the days Pastors made house calls. All I ever get is a voice mail message and I'm lucky if my call is returned by the Pastor. It seems some are turning their jobs into becoming managers. I'm sad about that as it shows a lack of caring. But I also think it is a sign of the times. The more they can push off onto the elders or cell group leaders, the less they'll have to do.

***********
Pastoral calls are a thing of the past. My family are all WELS at different churches and the discussion has come up about how the pastors never ever come to visit. Except for the address on the mailing list, they wouldn't even know where you live. They are just too 'busy' to do their jobs. I've seen how busy my pastor is just running from one kids baseball game to another soccer match. I'm sure it's his mentality that he only has to work just one day a week and then for only a few hours. It's no wonder they copy and paste a sermon. Many are neglecting their flocks.

GJ - Church and Chicaneries have definitely changed their synod. Think about that the next time they start crowing about how great Mequon is.

Faithful Pastors in WELS?


The wealthy have lost billions of dollars, so Miss Piggy is drying up fast. There is no Church Growth without heavy subsidies.


Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "WELS Member Comments":

"There are conservative (true to the Word) pastors that could take the call."

Pastors who are true to God's Word and the Lutheran Confessions do not exist in the WELS.

They all confess a new gospel, a new declaration of righteousness and have destroyed the central doctrine of Scripture in thier current confession. Opposing Christ and the Confessions they profess that the whole unbelieving world is righteous, forgiven of all sin and, by divine verdict, been declared by God to be guilt free all before faith worked by the Holy Spirit. Christ declares that no one is forgiven prior to faith in Him. Christ declares that the Holy Spirit's faith grasps hold of the fact that Christ paid for all sins and that by believing that your sins are then forgiven, you are justified through Christ and righteous in God's sight just as Christ is. WELS teaches that faith grasps hold of the fact that the whole unbelieving world was already declared forgiven when Christ paid for the worlds sin. That faith doesn't make of an unjust man a just man as Scripture and the Confessions declare but is just a open and empty hand accepting that you've already been declared forgiven. You are no different after faith than you were before faith.

The WELS and all Lutheran Synods confess this false gospel of Universal Objective Justification. Anyone who does is condemned by God and stand outside the body of Christ as Paul clearly states in the first chapter of Galations. There are those in the Lutheran churches who out of ignorance or hypocrisy do not confess the false gospel of Universal Objective Justification but believe they are forgiven and justified by faith alone in Christ alone by grace alone and not before faith. These are part of the invisible Church and are part of the body of Christ.

In Christ,
Brett Meyer

***

GJ - Actually, I disagree that there are no faithful pastors in WELS. I know there are pastors in WELS who realize how ridiculous UOJ is. In fact, there has been a shift toward emphasizing justification by faith (which is rumored to be in the Bible, throughout, unlike UOJ - which came from Halle U. and the Pietists).

The Synodical Conference leaders made a Pietistic mistake when they canonized rules of fellowship and practiced Mennonite shunning. They mistook outward actions for an inward love of the truth. Pretty soon they were doing wacky things, like excommunicating someone for having his son in an English speaking catechism class.

Luther's solution was to trust the Word and let God work through the Word. So he did not leave the Catholic Church. They excommunicated him - and he is still excommunicated.

I am deeply troubled by the many Boomer pastors and members who let their congregations and synod rot away. Issues in WELS did not have the courage to stay together when DP Free died, and very few showed their faces before that, when Gurgle showed up to glare at them.

I have friends and contacts in all the synods, except ELCA. I knew some pastors who realized the error of ELCA, but too late. Now they are like the people who thought Obama was the Messiah.

At any given time a Lutheran body is facing doctrinal error. However, they have not done a good job of dealing with those errors in the last 50 plus years. WELS may be different, but that remains to be seen.