Sunday, November 13, 2011

The Twenty-First Sunday after Trinity:
The Healing of the Official's Son.
John 4:46-54

By Norma Boeckler



The Twenty-Third Sunday after Trinity, 2011


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn # 1            O Day of Rest and Gladness            1:89
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed             p. 22
The Sermon Hymn # 261 Lord Keep Us Steadfast            1:93     

The Powerful, Effective Word

The Communion Hymn #413 I Walk in Danger              1:67 
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 49                    Almighty God             1:81

KJV Ephesians 6:10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. 11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. 14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; 15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:

KJV John 4:46 So Jesus came again into Cana of Galilee, where he made the water wine. And there was a certain nobleman, whose son was sick at Capernaum. 47 When he heard that Jesus was come out of Judaea into Galilee, he went unto him, and besought him that he would come down, and heal his son: for he was at the point of death. 48 Then said Jesus unto him, Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe. 49 The nobleman saith unto him, Sir, come down ere my child die. 50 Jesus saith unto him, Go thy way; thy son liveth. And the man believed the word that Jesus had spoken unto him, and he went his way. 51 And as he was now going down, his servants met him, and told him, saying, Thy son liveth. 52 Then enquired he of them the hour when he began to amend. And they said unto him, Yesterday at the seventh hour the fever left him. 53 So the father knew that it was at the same hour, in the which Jesus said unto him, Thy son liveth: and himself believed, and his whole house. 54 This is again the second miracle that Jesus did, when he was come out of Judaea into Galilee.

Twenty-First Sunday After Trinity

Almighty and everlasting God, who by Thy Son hast promised us the forgiveness of sins, righteousness, and everlasting life: We beseech Thee, do Thou by Thy Holy Spirit so quicken our hearts that we in daily prayer may seek our help in Christ against all temptations, and, constantly believing His promise, obtain that for which we pray, and at last be saved, through Thy Son Jesus Christ, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

The Powerful, Effective Word

Lenski:
He came, therefore, again unto Cana of Galilee, where he made the water wine. He took up the work where he had left it. The second miracle in Galilee was wrought at the same place where the first had been done. The first had prepared the ground, the second builds on that. And there was a certain royal official, whose son was sick at Capernaum. The report of Jesus’ arrival spread rapidly also to the larger city of Capernaum.
Lenski, R. C. H.: The Interpretation of St. John's Gospel. Minneapolis, MN : Augsburg Publishing House, 1961, S. 347.

The Gospel of John emphasizes the miracles of Jesus and their connection with the Word. The miracles verify the divine power of Jesus, and the spoken Word of Jesus accomplishes each one (as seen in the first three Gospels as well).

The miracles were often public and difficult for anyone to deny. The public nature shows how God chose to let everyone know about His Son, the Messiah. The very first miracle was the changing of water into wine, by the command of Jesus.

The character of each miracle teaches a different lesson. The water turned into wine showed Jesus touching nothing, so no one could accuse Him of using tricks. Even today many things that appear miraculous are just tricks. One magician made pages turn by blowing toward a book and moving away. The slow-motion camera showed him sending a puff of wind, getting up and away, and being “shocked” by the page turning.

The trick begins by making people think they are going to see something. They see the illusion and the trickster acts shocked, amazed, and joyful. Some mind-reading tricks are blatantly obvious.

I made smoke come out of my fingers by putting a sticky substance on them. When I pulled my fingers apart, filaments formed, which looked like smoke from a distance. The audience is told, “You will see smoke,” and they see smoke.

Therefore, in the water turned into wine, Jesus did not touch anything but had the people at the wedding do things which made each part of the miracle impervious to attack. And many people participated in the final results.

More than one trick involves changing the color of water, but that does not make it wine. The guests all enjoy the wine and even complained that the best wine was served last.

John 4:46 So Jesus came again into Cana of Galilee, where he made the water wine. And there was a certain nobleman, whose son was sick at Capernaum.

Royal official’s son:

This miracle shows how public Jesus’ ministry was, involving the crowds but also the elite. The Word and work of Jesus went out to all classes of people, to all groups, so no one had an excuse.

The nobleman worked for the tetrarch or local king. He was literally a royal official. Therefore, whatever happened reached the entire royal household. That created believers in Christ but it also began the opposition.

People in power react quickly to extinguish any threat to their comfort, security, and peace of mind. One historian pointed out that these people had to be ruthless, because anything short of that quality meant an end to the reign of that person.

America’s freedom is derived from a series of bad kings in England. The more they tried to hang onto their power, the more Parliament reduced their power and rebelled against them (the Stuarts, starting with King James I). The turmoil led to people moving to America for religious freedom, which was defined in the US Constitution. The irony is that we owe our freedom to kings who dishonestly tried to make England Roman Catholic again.

Although we can pass over this man’s title easily, the word has great significance. Because he was connected with the local king, he had contacts with all the leaders of society – ruling families, servants, and soldiers.

John 4:47 When he heard that Jesus was come out of Judaea into Galilee, he went unto him, and besought him that he would come down, and heal his son: for he was at the point of death.

In most cases, Jesus was there for the miracle. Jesus even offered to visit the centurion’s household to heal that servant.

KJV Matthew 8:5 And when Jesus was entered into Capernaum, there came unto him a centurion, beseeching him, 6 And saying, Lord, my servant lieth at home sick of the palsy, grievously tormented. 7 And Jesus saith unto him, I will come and heal him. 8 The centurion answered and said, Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof: but speak the word only, and my servant shall be healed. 9 For I am a man under authority, having soldiers under me: and I say to this man, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it. 10 When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel.

The royal official’s son was at the point of death. He believed in Jesus and trusted that He would heal his son. In this case, Jesus did not offer to visit the son. Instead, he seemed to be rebuking the sorrowing man.

48 Then said Jesus unto him, Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe.

Here the problem with our current use of “you.” Following the German “du”, thou was always 2nd person singular. But “you” can be singular or plural. Greek always distinguishes between the two, both in the pronoun and the verb ending.

Then Jesus said to him, “Unless y’all see miracles and wonders, y’all will not believe.” (Jackson Living Bible)

The rebuke is aimed at everyone around. The problem was that people believed as long as they saw great wonders, but their faith stopped there. As soon as any difficulty came up, even in teaching, they walked away for these were “hard sayings.” In fact, many Gospel narratives include hard sayings, which make people erupt in accusations against God’s Word. These are tests of faith, because God is offering His whole counsel, not just what pleases us at the moment.
49 The nobleman saith unto him, Sir, come down ere my child die.

The royal official clearly had no concept of the unlimited power of the Word, but his continued request shows his continued faith.

Jesus never turned down a request made to Him. The scoffers like to accuse Him of harshness and coldness. But responding 100% of the time is not harsh, not cold. He healed and He taught at the same time. 

We can see the man’s faith in his response to the next statement

50 Jesus saith unto him, Go thy way; thy son liveth. And the man believed the word that Jesus had spoken unto him, and he went his way.

At first the official believed in the power of Jesus when the Savior was physically present. After the rebuke to the crowd and Jesus’ assurance, he believed in the power of the Word.

John 16:8 reveals that the power of the Holy Spirit in the Word is to rebuke us for our unbelief – that we do not completely trust in Christ.

Just to prove that the Holy Spirit still needs to work among us with the Word, many ministers and laity think that convicting the world of sin means – gambling, drinking, dancing, doing drugs, and criticizing the synod.

And yet, Jesus defined sin quite clearly - KJV John 16:9 Of sin, because they believe not on me;

However, because of their hardness of heart, many have turned faith in Christ into a heresy, a sin.

The royal official trusted in Jesus so completely that he headed toward home. He believed Jesus’ Word would heal his deathly ill son. That is complete trust.

Lenski:
In other words: “It is not at all necessary for me to go to Capernaum to save thy child’s life, not necessary that I should thus prolong thy suspense and anxiety—right here and now I grant thy prayer and give thee thy little son’s life.” Thus Jesus now corrects the man’s poor notion about hurrying to the child’s side and he does it with one stroke. The power to heal lies in the person of Jesus—where else could it lie? It is a matter of his will and his word, not one of inches or miles. Jesus gives the man only his word and even that in the tersest form, “Thy son lives”—not a syllable more. On him who speaks this little word, and on the little word this person speaks, the man is thus bidden to rest his faith. On paper, and as we read it from the printed page, it does seem little—too little; yet as there spoken by Jesus it was mighty, it bore all the power of Jesus’ will, a divine pledge, an unconditional assurance, an absolute promise. As such it struck upon the man’s heart full of faith-kindling power.
Lenski, R. C. H.: The Interpretation of St. John's Gospel. Minneapolis, MN : Augsburg Publishing House, 1961, S. 351

As Lenski observed, Jesus was especially gracious. Instead of letting the man travel back home in anguish, depending on the arrival of Jesus – a trip that would have been slowed by crowds eager to find out, his son was immediately released from death.

51 And as he was now going down, his servants met him, and told him, saying, Thy son liveth. 52 Then enquired he of them the hour when he began to amend. And they said unto him, Yesterday at the seventh hour the fever left him. 53 So the father knew that it was at the same hour, in the which Jesus said unto him, Thy son liveth: and himself believed, and his whole house. 54 This is again the second miracle that Jesus did, when he was come out of Judaea into Galilee.

These verses show that the boy recovered the moment Jesus spoke the Word of Promise to the father.

The son lived and the entire household believe – adults, children, and servants, and their babies. The Scriptures never deprive babies of faith. They also believe in Christ. Their faith is the ideal. They do not stop to puzzle, “How can such things be?”

The Power of Word of Forgiveness
This is one of many miracles teaching the power of the Word. There could be many fewer miracles of healing. Many more took place without being recorded. Some were simply summarized in groups.

This Gospel helps us see what it means to say, “The Word pronounces forgiveness upon believers. The Word consecrates the elements.”

All the objections are rationalistic objections. Or they come from doubt.

That is why we look at the Word of God as a whole, not just from a fragment of one verse. The apostles did not preach on a fragment. The epistles were not read in half-verses.

This what every believer needs to know about this lesson. How do I know that my sins are forgiven? There are so many and so many types. Some seem to be too terrible to be forgiven.

The answer comes from this miracle of healing. The boy was dying in a distant city. Jesus said, “Your son is healed,” and he was healed.

Jesus says, “Your sins are forgiven,” and they are forgiven all believers.

Repentance is important, and the Law begins that work. But the Law does not pronounce forgiveness. The Gospel shows us the Father’s grace.

And the Holy Spirit says, in effect, “You do not believe this? You doubt the overwhelming grace of God. You doubt the completeness of the crucified and risen Christ?

And in a positive sense, believing is forgiveness. Not the faith of theologians who quibble and fight, the faith of little children, who trust and love Jesus with unqualified joy.

How could Jesus heal a deathly ill boy from a distance?

Any child will answer, “Because He is God.”

How can the Word consecrate the elements and forgive our sins? Because it is the will of the holy, Triune God.

Quotations on Forgiveness

TWENTY-SECOND SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY
Forgiveness; November 8, 1998

"If the question is put, 'Why did God ordain so many means of grace when one suffices to confer upon the sinner His grace and forgiveness?' we quote the reply of Luther who writes (Smalcald Articles, IV: 'The Gospel not merely in one way gives us counsel and aid against sin, for God is superabundantly rich in His grace. First through the spoken Word, by which the forgiveness of sins is preached in the whole world, which is the peculiar office of the Gospel. Secondly through Baptism. Thirdly through the holy Sacrament of the Altar. Fourthly through the power of the keys and also through the mutual conversation and consolation of brethren, Matthew 18:20.'"
John Theodore Mueller, Christian Dogmatics, A Handbook of Doctrinal Theology, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1934, p. 447.

"For now we are only half pure and holy, so that the Holy Ghost has ever [some reason why] to continue His work in us through the Word, and daily to dispense forgiveness, until we attain to that life where there will be no more forgiveness, but only perfectly pure and holy people, full of godliness and righteousness, removed and free from sin, death, and all evil, in a new, immortal, and glorified body."
The Large Catechism, The Creed, Article III, #58, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 693. Tappert, p. 418.        

Dr. Luther, Large Catechism: "Again: With this Word you can strengthen your conscience and say: If a hundred thousand devils, together with all fanatics, should rush forward, crying, How can bread and wine be the body and blood of Christ? I know that all spirits and scholars together are not as wise as is the Divine Majesty in His little finger. Now, here stands the Word of Christ: 'Take, eat; this is My body. Drink ye all of this'...Here we abide, and would like to see those who will constitute themselves His masters, and make it different from what He has spoken."
Formula of Concord, Epitome, Article VII, Lord's Supper, 22, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 979. Tappert, p. 573.      

"The objection that absolution is God's prerogative (Mark 2:7) is beside the mark, since the minister forgives sins not in his own name, but in God's name."
Th. Engelder, et. al., Popular Symbolics, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1934, p. 113.  

"Wherever the means of grace are present, there the Lord Himself is present, and where the Lord rules there is victory. The true doctrine of justification is intimately bound up with the true doctrine of the means of grace. In order to keep the doctrine of justification in all its purity, one must ever maintain that the forgiveness of sins which Christ earned for mankind can never be appropriated by man through any other means than the Word and the Sacrament. Therefore, Walther said, the correct doctrine on justification stands or falls with the correct doctrine concerning the means of grace."
Edwin E. Pieplow, "The Means of Grace," The Abiding Word, ed., Theodore Laetsch, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1946, II, p. 327.

V. Mueller Catechism:
"Although the work of redemption was accomplished on the cross and forgiveness of sin acquired, yet it cannot come to us in any other way than through the Word. For what would we otherwise know about it that such a thing was accomplished or was to be given to us if it were not presented by preaching, or the oral Word?"
Eduard Preuss, "The Means of Grace," The Justification of the Sinner before God, trans., Julius A. Friedrich, Chicago: F. Allerman, 1934, p. 59.         



"If we call Sacraments rites which have the command of God, and to which the promise of grace has been added, it is easy to decide what are properly Sacraments...Therefore Baptism, the Lord's Supper, and Absolution, which is the Sacrament of Repentance, are truly Sacraments. For these rites have God's command and the promise of grace, which is peculiar to the New Testament. For when we are baptized, when we eat the Lord's body, when we are absolved, our hearts must be firmly assured that God truly forgives us for Christ's sake. And God, at the same time, by the Word and by the rite, moves hearts to believe and conceive faith, just as Paul says, Romans 10:17: 'Faith cometh by hearing.' But just as the Word enters the ear in order to strike our heart, so the rite itself strikes the eye, in order to move the heart. The effect of the Word and of the rite is the same..."
[Luther, Bab Captivity, 3 sacraments] Article XIII, Number/Use Sacraments, Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 309. Tappert, p. 211.  

"These are the last and mad times of a world grown old."
Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1971, I, p. 50.   

"Contrition is altogether necessary in those who truly and earnestly repent. For there can be no true repentance in those who, persuaded of their own holiness, dream that they are without sin, or who disregard, minimize, excuse, cloak, and defend their sins, despise or ridicule the divine threats, do not care about the wrath of God, are not moved by His judgment and displeasure, and therefore persevere and continue in sins against their conscience, delight in sins, and seek and seize occasions for sinning and for whatever they intentionally heap up without the fear of God--in them, I say, there can be no true repentance...."
Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1986, II, p. 581.     

"We have now sowed a little of the Word, and this the devil cannot stand, for he never sleeps; the worms and the beetles will come and infect it. Yet so it must be, Christ will prove His Word, and examine who have received it and who not. Therefore let us remain on the right road to the kingdom of Christ, and not go about with works and urge and force the works of the law, but only with the words of the Gospel which comfort the conscience: Be happy, be of good cheer, thy sins are forgiven."
 Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholaus Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, V, p. 201.      

"Regret, the little black dog of a belated repentance, does not stop barking and biting the conscience, even though you know your sins are forgiven."
 What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, III, p. 1214. Genesis 37:18-20. 

"But the sinners who confess their sins, and are repentant, who wish they had not so angered God, who find all their concern and sorrow in the fact that they have offended God and have not kept His Commandments and, therefore, pray for grace--these sinners shall find grace."
 What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 694.          

"Also the objection that there is no need of offering and confirming to Christians one and the same forgiveness of sins in several ways betrays an astonishing ignorance. Both Scripture and experience teach that men who feel the weight of their sins find nothing harder to believe than the forgiveness of their sins. Hence repetition of the assurance of the forgiveness of sins in various ways through the means of grace meets a practical need of Christians."
Francis Pieper, Christian Dogmatics, 3 vols., trans., Walter W. F. Albrecht, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1953, III, p. 114.





Saturday, November 12, 2011

Comment from the Martin Chemnitz Press Blog



Jocep has left a new comment on your post "Going Digital":

I greatly appreciate your materials on M.Chemnitz Press. I am a former Anglican (bishop) who by God's grace has been led to the pure doctrine of Gospel as believed and confessed in the Book of Concord.

Shock - Schmeling Quotes Leyser!
Why Does He Tolerate UOJ, Church Growth,
And Other Wauwatosa Maladies?



AC V has left a new comment on your post "Who Is Polycarp Leyser? The Founder of a Dynasty o...":

"Lutherans have far more in common with Romanists than with Calvinists." - Polykarp Leyser

Gayling R. Schmeling in a paper entitled "Polykarp Leyser (1552-1610): A Theological Bridge Between Chemnitz and Gerhard" cites that quote by Leyser in the context of these comments:

"... there was a movement toward a new iconoclasm among the Reformed. They rejected the Lutheran use of the high altars, the Flügelaltar, crucifix, and so forth. The Calvinists said that the Bible spoke of none of these things and that they were idolatry. The Lutherans responded that such things were not forbidden in Scripture and that they were good teaching tools for the people. These things were the laymen’s Bible in a time when literacy was by no means universal. The altar pictures, the stained glass windows, and the crucifix portrayed the way of salvation.

Whenever the Calvinists gained control in a territory, they removed the beautiful altars and
replaced them with communion tables. They threw out the altar pictures and crucifixes and whitewashed the sanctuary. They whitewashed the sanctuary as the Turks had whitewashed Hagia Sophia, so their sanctuaries looked more like a mosque than a church. Polykarp Leyser complained that 'wherever these Calvinists gain the upper hand, they remove all pictures, paintings, crucifixes from churches and altars … as has already happened in France, the Low Countries, and other places where churches now look like horse stables.' The Reformed said that the altar paintings and crucifixes were nothing but papal idolatries, but how could they say that about the altars of Lucas Cranach and other evangelical painters?"


Leyser has this zinger: “If our Calvinist friends really are such pure Christians with such tender consciences that they cannot tolerate any pictures in church, why do they not object to the images that are imprinted on the red gulden or silver thalers which they carry in their pockets? I have never seen them throw any of these away.”

Schmeling concludes: "This famous dictum of Leyser (i.e. "Lutherans have far more in common with Romanists than with Calvinists.") was the common opinion of orthodox Lutherans during the lengthy conflict with the Reformed in the early seventeenth century."

Is that the common opinion in WELS Lutheranism today? Well, you know the answer.

Schmeling's paper:

http://www.blts.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/GRS-Leyser.pdf 

***

GJ - The last I knew of the Little Schoolhouse on the Prairie (Bethany Seminary), the Book of Concord was prominent in the classroom. How does one reconcile knowing about P. Leyser and overlooking the doctrinal crimes of ELS-WELS?

Once again it is the Penn State syndrome - knowing but doing nothing, which is the same as enabling the criminal.

The ELS once stood up to the Missouri Synod, publicly accusing its sister synod in the Olde Synodical Conference of apostasy. That was when they had leaders like Ylvisaker instead of yes-men like Schmeling and Moldstad.

They know they will pass from memory in 20 years, thanks to their own self-study. Why not go out with a bang instead of a whimpering "amen" to WELS' heresies?

Gaylin said at the ELS convention, "If Wayne Mueller become president of WELS, we should break fellowship with them." George Orvick made a face. That was long ago, and Schmeling is calmer now. Comatose.

Bethania to host interfaith Thanksgiving service



Bethania to host interfaith Thanksgiving service:

GJ - This is ancient news and not edgy if ELCA is doing it. Mark Jeske participated in a joint service with a rabbi and a priest or witch-doctor. No one did anything. The Milwaukee paper wrote it up.

The Wisconsin sect considers this evangelism while glancing at Ichabod is breaking fellowship with them. Perhaps that is a good thing.

'via Blog this'

Luther Rocks: The English Translations are Not the Word of God...



Luther Rocks: The English Translations are Not the Word of God...:

GJ - A Gnostic concept of the Scriptures is being floated - to win UOJ arguments.

Or Roman Catholic - Only the priesthood can announce Christian doctrine, and priests are infallible as long as they are in agreement with the pope at headquarters.

This is also a Muslim hermaneutic, because the only real Koran is in Arabic.



'via Blog this'

Thursday, November 10, 2011

The Mequon, Mankato, and Concordia Faculties Have a Lot of 'Splaining To Do

C. F. W. Walther


2138 has left a new comment on your post "Happy Hunting - Baier Walther Compend":

Part 3, Chapter 3, On faith in Christ

http://www.projectwittenberg.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/baier/cpt-3-03.txt

1. So that sinful humans may reach eternal salvation through Christ the mediator, faith in Christ is required or, it is required that they trust in Christ as mediator.


7. However at the same time it is clear, in what way the same merit of Christ, the forgiveness of sins and life eternal, acquired by Christ for all humans, are applied to the believing through faith, so that truly the sharers of those things are restored.

Part 3, Chapter 5, On justification

http://www.projectwittenberg.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/baier/cpt-3-05.txt

1. Justification, which closely follows conversion, has a legal significance and it indicates that act, by which God the judge pronounces a human guilty of sins and so also a criminal of guilt and punishment, but the ones believing in Christ, he pronounces righteous; about which it is not established from reason, but from the evangelical Scriptures.

5. And thus to this same process of justification pertains, that God, as a judge of a human accused by the law and convicted of sin, however at the same time by believing in Christ thus he recognizes a cause, so that indeed special justice catches one to be left both to death and to eternal damnation, however he judges to pertain to him or he imputes to him the merit of Christ received by faith, so that therefore he does not fully hold for the sinner, but he absolves from the accusation and obligation to punishment.

15. It is possible to define justification, that it is an act of the divine will, by which the triune God by his free grace on account of the merits of Christ apprehended by human sinners through faith, reborn or converted, forgives sins - the cause of the following eternal salvation.

The Two Martins and Their Two Birthdays

Luther was born on November 10, 1483.



Martin Chemnitz was born November 9, 1522.
Like Tyndale (the real author of the KJV), he studied
under Luther and Melanchthon.

Happy Hunting - Baier Walther Compend


Pastor Loerber heard the confessions,
but the alternative story is that many already knew.
Bishop Stephan was already in court in Dresden for his infidelities,
before they left for America.
The confessions were used as an excuse to suddenly turn on their leader.

I believe many can benefit from studying the Walther edition of the Baier compend. Learn redaction criticism the hard way - by reading.

Baier-Walther.

This is in English - easy going.

When you find something, send a comment with the link. Exact quotations are appreciated. So is commentary.

 Walther's Pastoral Theology is filled with wisdom.
Missouri and WELS follow the same abusive template today.

---

2138 has left a new comment on your post "Happy Hunting - Baier Walther Compend":

Part 3, Chapter 3, On faith in Christ

http://www.projectwittenberg.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/baier/cpt-3-03.txt

1. So that sinful humans may reach eternal salvation through Christ the mediator, faith in Christ is required or, it is required that they trust in Christ as mediator.


7. However at the same time it is clear, in what way the same merit of Christ, the forgiveness of sins and life eternal, acquired by Christ for all humans, are applied to the believing through faith, so that truly the sharers of those things are restored.

Part 3, Chapter 5, On justification

http://www.projectwittenberg.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/baier/cpt-3-05.txt

1. Justification, which closely follows conversion, has a legal significance and it indicates that act, by which God the judge pronounces a human guilty of sins and so also a criminal of guilt and punishment, but the ones believing in Christ, he pronounces righteous; about which it is not established from reason, but from the evangelical Scriptures.

5. And thus to this same process of justification pertains, that God, as a judge of a human accused by the law and convicted of sin, however at the same time by believing in Christ thus he recognizes a cause, so that indeed special justice catches one to be left both to death and to eternal damnation, however he judges to pertain to him or he imputes to him the merit of Christ received by faith, so that therefore he does not fully hold for the sinner, but he absolves from the accusation and obligation to punishment.

15. It is possible to define justification, that it is an act of the divine will, by which the triune God by his free grace on account of the merits of Christ apprehended by human sinners through faith, reborn or converted, forgives sins - the cause of the following eternal salvation.

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Happy Hunting - Baier Walther Compend":

All UOJ proponents play loose with the Words of Scripture. They determine the rules of the game, when Justification means Objective and when it means Subjective. Their penchant for wider and narrower meanings of God's concise and specific declarations in Scripture have carried them to the edge of the abyss. One word which they haven't been able to play so recklessly with is 'reconciled'. UOJ perverts God's Word and teaches that the whole unbelieving world has been reconciled to God through Christ's atonement. They point to Walther's universalistic statements to prove that's what God meant when He had the prophets write His "Do-words" (a reference to the false ichablog's disjointed diatribe).

Contrary to UOJ's blasphemy here is a clear and faithful statement that harmonizes with the Lutheran Confessions:

"24...truly the gospel points to the mediator himself, and through him the being accomplished grace of God and the forgiveness of sins. From where the law indeed prepares the human soul for the receiving faith, however the gospel kindles the same faith, by which sinners are reconciled to God."

http://www.projectwittenberg.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/baier/cpt-3-07.txt

Thoughts on Analytical Chemistry - From a Non-Chemist



I was in a special chem-physics class in high school. My lab partner earned a PhD in math. Another friend in class earned a PhD in rocket science. A third student won a full scholarship at Yale College. The class taught me that chemistry was more than filling the house with smoke from a Gilbert Chemistry set and having my parents yell down the basement steps, "What are doing down there? It smells like Hell!" That was the burning sulfur.

Much later, a tour of the Dow analytical chemistry labs in Midland, Michigan taught me that the key to identifying chemicals was getting them excited and reading how the ingredients responded. I wrote about this before, but some of you have not memorized all 7,000 posts yet.

Doctrinal polemics are quite similar. If I ask someone what he really teaches (exciting the ingredients) his response will tell me what the actual components are. Lutherans do this without shame or shyness. The Pietists loathe doctrinal discussions unless they can agree to all disbelieve together - true unity.

Chemnitz was a master polemicist and the senior Concordist.
Few Lutheran pastors know or appreciate his work.


About 20 years ago, a WELS pastor told me that he could barely organize a theology conference. No one wanted to admit that their little group was all over the place. Two more decades of neglect have only made things worse.

When Mark Schroeder was elected Synod President, replacing the fleeing ex-SP, I suggested a thorough study of the Book of Concord by all congregations. Needless to say, no one wanted to do that. The pastors are trained against the Confessions, returning the ministerium to the time when the first SP called the confessions "paper fences." Bading and Hoenecke changed that - Bading at Historic St. John's, Hoenecke at the seminary.

The fake blog is emitting panic signals, which I take to be reflective of the general state of the Changer leadership. Although they have hidden away in plain site, now they are easily identified. Their hideous doctrine is revealed and UOJ is understood as anti-Gospel rather than immutable Gospel truth. Worst of all - for the Changers - WELS members have done the research and helped put together a coherent portrait of UOJ.

Recent discussions revealed how Jay Webber was willing to quote an out-of-the-closet Pietist against Chemnitz.

The Calvinist-Pietist bloodline is UOJ, the Holy Spirit divorced from the Word and Sacrament, efficacy coming from chance or the clever methods of man.

The Biblical Lutheran bloodline is justification by faith alone, the Holy Spirit working through the efficacious Word in the Means of Grace.

Any person can ask the right questions and get the pastors, seminary professors, and synod drones to emit signals. Those signals clearly show where they belong in the universe of confessions.

I am not asking anyone to agree with me. I am not the ruling norm (the Scriptures), and not the ruled norm (Confessions). Debate means that people are awake and ware about the Confessions. That will determine where someone is. Those who loathe the Confessions and find them boring are the Pietists. They may believe now but they are on the way to Unitarianism or Pentecostalism, the two routes of Enthusiasm.

I am simply following John 16:8, where the Holy Spirit rebukes and convicts - You do not utterly trust in Jesus. How strange to have "conservative" Lutheran pastors enraged by John 16:8, by Luther, by the orthodox Lutheran writers.


---

LutherRocks has left a new comment on your post "Thoughts on Analytical Chemistry - From a Non-Chem...":

Solid. These are the kind of posts that keep an orthodox Lutheran grounded; the kind that I have always appreciated...even when I was on the other side of that fence so to speak. All the Fake-O-Bodians have to offer when presented with such is ad hominem...

***

GJ - Joe, few of us were born with the Triglotta in one hand and the Weimar edition of Luther in the other. Doctrinal turmoil makes us hunger and thirst for the truth, and the Word fills us accordingly.

ELCA News Service - Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

ELCA News Service - Evangelical Lutheran Church in America:

Kathryn M. Lohre
Married? Life Partner?
She got her honorary degree in Mishawaka, Indiana.
No jokes, please.

ELCA NEWS SERVICE
November 9, 2011
First ELCA member installed as National Council of Churches president
11-134-MRC



CHICAGO (ELCA) -- Kathryn M. Lohre was installed as president of the National Council of Churches Nov. 9 at a service held at the Lutheran Center here. A member of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), Lohre is the first Lutheran and ELCA member to serve as president of the council and the youngest woman to serve in that role.


While her presidency marks these two historic firsts, it will also be the first time a woman succeeds a woman as president of the council. [ GJ - Maybe no straight man wanted to helm the S. S. Titanic.]


 Lohre said her presidency also provides a unique opportunity for the ELCA. It will "visibly demonstrate (this church's) commitment to the ecumenical vision, as well as its commitment to lifelong ecumenical formation, leadership development and women's leadership," she said. [GJ- WELS has been doing that for decades, working with Babtists, Pantingcostals, Mefodists, New Agers, ELCA, and - big secret - Missouri.]


Lohre joined the ELCA churchwide staff in October as part of the ecumenical and inter-religious relations team under the leadership of the Rev. Donald McCoid, assistant to the presiding bishop, ELCA Ecumenical and Inter-Religious Relations.


The installation was a service of word and sacrament. McCoid was the presiding minister and ELCA Presiding Bishop Mark S. Hanson preached the sermon.


 Reflecting on the Book of Amos, Hanson told the assembly, "God's promise, justice and righteous will flow like refreshing waters of the highest mountain, it will flow abundantly upon you and through you and me, flowing into the life of the world just as the light of Jesus will now flow into your life through bread and wine."


The Rev. Dr. Michael Kinnamon, general secretary for the National Council of Churches, presided over the installation, which included the installation of other council officers for the organization. Ecumenical guests also participated in the service.


 In addition to her positions with the ELCA and the National Council of Churches, Lohre represents the ELCA as a member of the Central Committee of the World Council of Churches.


Before joining the ELCA churchwide staff, Lohre was assistant director of the Pluralism Project at Harvard University, a research project on the changing religious landscape in the United States.


Lohre was a member of the ELCA Bishop's Communal Discernment Task Force and on the Bishop's Global, Ecumenical and Interfaith Relationships Roundtable. She served on the former ELCA Commission for Women Steering Committee and as an assistant to the 2000 ELCA Youth Gathering.


 Lohre is a summa cum laude graduate of St. Olaf College in Northfield, Minn., and earned a Master of Divinity degree at Harvard Divinity School. St. Olaf is one of 26 ELCA colleges and universities.


 In May 2011, the Graduate Theological Foundation in Mishawaka, Ind., conferred an honorary Doctor of Divinity to Lohre, "in recognition of her election as president-elect of the National Council of Churches and also in recognition of her contributions to women's interfaith issues and pluralism."

---


Kathryn M. Lohre 



Kathryn M. Lohre, assistant director of the Pluralism Project at Harvard University and an Evangelical Lutheran Church in America representative to the World Council of Churches Central Committee, began her term as the President Elect of the National Council of Churches on January 1, 2010.

She was installed in her office on November 12, 2009, in St. Mark's Cathedral in Minneapolis. The Rev. Peg Chemberlin, current NCC President Elect, was installed as NCC President.

Chemberlin and Lohre will serve in their new offices until December 31, 2011. Constitutionally, the NCC President Elect succeeds to the Presidency.
Lohre, 32, will be 34 when it is time to succeed to the National Council of Churches Presidency in 2012. She will be the second youngest president of the Council since the Rev. Dr. M. William Howard, an American Baptist, became president in 1979 at the age of 33.

Kathryn Lohre has been assistant director of the Pluralism Project at Harvard since 2005, serving with project director Dr. Diana Eck, a member of the NCC Governing Board and chair of the NCC's Interfaith Relations Commission. Lohre has been a member of the Pluralism Project's staff since 2000.

As assistant director, Lohre supervises graduate and undergraduate student research on religious pluralism, provides leadership to the women's initiative and multi-religious women's network, convenes and plans events including colloquia, conferences, panels and public conversations, teaches workshops, prepares grant proposals and oversees fundraising.

Lohre is a summa cum laude graduate of St. Olaf College, Northfield, Minn., and earned the Master of Divinity degree at Harvard Divinity School.

She is a member of Faith Lutheran Church in Cambridge, Mass., and serves on the Bishop's Communal Discernment Task Force in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. She is a member of the World Council of Churches U.S. Conference Board of Directors and has served on the National Council of Churches Ecumenical Young Adult Women’s Working Group.

***

GJ

She wants to transform the world too, just like Ski and Glende.

And I myself, in Rome, heard it said openly in the streets, “If there is a hell, then Rome is built on it.” That is, “After the devil himself, there is no worse folk than the pope and his followers.” Against the Roman Papacy, An Institution of the Devil ( Wider das Papstum zu Rom vom Teuffel Gestifft, A. D. 1545)[8] (Wiki link, Martin_Luther)

Pancake Pope, protecting the faithful against
Shrove Tuesday pancakes.
But incest is an adiaphoron.


And I myself, in Rome, heard it said openly in the streets, “If there is a hell, then Rome is built on it.” That is, “After the devil himself, there is no worse folk than the pope and his followers.” Against the Roman Papacy, An Institution of the Devil ( Wider das Papstum zu Rom vom Teuffel Gestifft, A. D. 1545)[8] (Wiki link, Martin_Luther):

"But Bernhard Müller, editor of the Catholic magazine PUR, dismissed the clerics' reaction as grossly hypocritical. He alleged that the pornography scandal at Weltbild had been going on for at least a decade with the Church's full knowledge. Mr Müller said that in 2008, a group of concerned Catholics had sent bishops a 70-page document containing irrefutable evidence that Weltbild published books that promoted pornography, Satanism and magic. They demanded that the publisher withdraw the titles.

Jerry Sandusky Rumored to Have Been 'Pimping Out Young Boys to Rich Donors,' Says Mark Madden - College Football - NESN.com

Jerry Sandusky Rumored to Have Been 'Pimping Out Young Boys to Rich Donors,' Says Mark Madden - College Football - NESN.com:


In April, Pittsburgh radio host Mark Madden wrote a story revealing Penn State for much of the cover-up ofJerry Sandusky's alleged child rape that has been exposed in the past week. While it didn't raise many eyebrows back then, six months later it looks to be incredibly accurate.
On Thursday morning, just hours after legendary head coach Joe Paterno and university president Graham Spanier were fired by the school's board of trustees, Madden was asked on The Dennis and Callahan Show what he believes the next piece of news will be.
What he said was twice as shocking as anything that's been released thus far.
"I can give you a rumor and I can give you something I think might happen," Madden told John Dennis andGerry Callahan. "I hear there's a rumor that there will be a more shocking development from the Second Mile Foundation -- and hold on to your stomachs, boys, this is gross, I will use the only language I can -- that Jerry Sandusky and Second Mile were pimping out young boys to rich donors. That was being investigated by two prominent columnists even as I speak."
After the news spread, Madden later explained via Twitter why he went public with the rumors.





'via Blog this'

Please Consult Your Synodical Lawyers, Tim Glende:
Too Bad You Excommunicated Your Own Attorney



Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "The Rotten Apples of Appleton Continue Their Crimi...":

http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=82112&blog_ID=1201781237163508206&blog_URL=http://ichabodthegloryisdeparted.blogspot.com/

Impersonation

Abuse

Blogger Help Forum Posting Guidelines

Impersonation

Please read below for more details, and choose Continue to report this claim, or Cancel to go back to the Help Center homepage.

If a Blogger user is impersonating you by using your real name in their profile, please let us know and we will take action as necessary. Please note that this does not include cases of parody or satire of individuals. Unfortunately, Blogger is not in a position to determine ownership of nicknames, handles, or screen names.


---

Sticks and Stones...

It's interesting to us how Dr. Gregory L. Jackson, PhD, claims that Real Ichabod is guilty of "criminal impersonation" and that the supposed fake post by Brett Meyer is now a "legal matter." Who's calling the kettle black? There are innumerable people who could take Dr. Jackson to court and sue him for slander and libel if they so chose; and they would probably win any court case hands down. There are enough people Dr. Jackson has slandered and libeled that they could probably file a class-action suit against this fake pastor. Dr. Jackson's site is filled with lies and untruthful innuendo. Jackson calls it satire. What it is is sin, a breaking of the Eighth Commandment. Wake up, followers of Dr. Jackson!

***

GJ - Tim Glende, you woke up your whole district. Pastors and laity  investigated you on their own. They found you guilty of plagiarism, lying about plagiarism, etc. The only reason you are still working is that your District President is in the pocket of the Church and Changers.

Brett Meyer does not write this blog,. Blowing smoke with unwarranted accusations against me will not absolve you of your crimes.

You keep having tantrums whenever someone threatens your false doctrine lupine behavior. Were you potty-trained at gunpoint? What is your excuse? I hope you get help before you draw more into your crimes.

The Rotten Apples of Appleton Continue Their Criminal Impersonation.
Tim Glende Refuses Brett Meyer's Request To Remove Fake Post

Tim Glende's shirt reminds everyone of his reputation in school,
which continues in the parish.
That is not his wife in this Facebook photo, which he featured.






 Brett Meyer said...
I am requesting your consideration. Please remove the comment that someone left in my name. I assure you that I didn't write the comment. I stand by everything that I've written and posted on the internet and have linked to most of it at one time or another so anyone interested can see the context in which it was written and consider my opinions and confession. Since you disagree with my opinions and confession written elsewhere there's no need to maintain a false impersonation of my statements. Just let my confession speak for itself.

Thank you,
Brett Meyer
November 9, 2011 8:22 PM
Blogger Real Ichabod said...
We won't be removing your comment, Brett, or whoever you are. How do we know you're the real Brett Meyer? Maybe the fake Brett wants us to remove the comment. No, it will stay, since the original comment is consistent with what you have written previously.

---


The reasoning behind the rejection of my request is revealing. Anyone can see that the slanderous comment was signed anonymousely. My request for its removal was signed with my Blogger profile name which has one of my email addresses attached. My comment here and throughout this Ichabod site uses the Blogger profile. The inability to see that or the unwillingness to allow my request is simply juvenile.

If only I had used "do-words" they would have graciously complied. I couldn't stop laughing after I heard that one!

***

GJ - The double-talk from Tim Glende is revealing. He answers Brett Meyer's signed request (with his profile and email) and says, "How do we know you're the real Brett Meyer?"

Tim Glende's criminal impersonation of Brett Meyer is now a legal matter. He may think his blog is anonymous, but Blogger knows better. Google Blogger is on the hook for criminal impersonation, so they are not going to tolerate the Appleton Gang's tricks.

The <s>Northern</s> Anything Goes District is known for treating its own members this way.


Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed: WELS GA Personality.
This Explains the Cover-Up the Felonies Attitude



Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed: WELS GA Personality:


I went through the whole system. Prep was definitely the worst. The "running" by seniors lasted the whole year and some (not all, not by a long shot) was very cruel and humiliating). There are some pastors and teachers who are two and three years than I am to whom I still can't talk because those memories won't go away. I vowed that I would not run freshmen the way I was run (ran?). The seniors said, "We all said that when we were Freshmen. Look at us now." For the most part, though, I kept that promise. The only exception was when I allowed myself to get into a group mentality when I was with a few of my classmates who did like running freshmen. NWC, on the other hand, had the tradition of initiating the freshmen during Homecoming week. Most who were involved with that did it all very tongue and cheek and it didn't carry over throughout the rest of the year. GA at Sem was rumored to be the worst of the bunch. I found that it was actually more of a spoof of initiation than an actual initiation ritual proper. It was sort of, "I got fooled by this when I was a Junior. Now it's your turn." So, there it is. The whole experience wasn't as innocent as some claim (high school was bad), nor as bad as others claim (college and Seminary was almost comical).
P.S. I take it you still haven't figured out the literary reference in my pen name.



'via Blog this'

---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed: WELS GA Personali...":

Sexta is the ordinal form of Six in Latin:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sexta

When the college and seminary course was six years long (vicarage year was added during the Depression) and another year was added at some point, the classes were named in countdown mode: six, five, four, three, etc. Only in Prep did the classes retain those names, and at Martin Luther Prep in Watertown, they still do. Last time I was there was 2008 or so.

So the Sextas (freshmen) are just out of grade school and away from home, and besides doing their Latin and other homework, they have to clean a room and make the beds of juniors (quartas) and seniors (tertias), endure their harassment and threats, and receive pink bellies and grundies and be at the bottom of monkey piles. The sextas must also act as waitresses in the cafeteria for entire tables getting them juices and water and such for the entire school year, and some of them got hit for being a waitress for entire table of tertias or quartas three or four times a week, or more, as their food got cold. The quintas (sophomores) had no "powers."

I don't know if the "running" or "hazing" and physical abuse still goes on, but I have heard that still in 2005 or so seniors and juniors would put freshmen and sophomores in headlocks and otherwise illegally restrain freshmen, putting them in mental and physical duress.

***

GJ - Prep is where the brain-washing and sadism begins. The behavior is often sub-human and encouraged by the graduates of that same system of hazing. Anyone who tells parents is tortured even more, so naturally everyone denies anything has happened.

Mutual blackmail threats also help.

A WELS teacher can murder his wife, lie about it, and get a busload of students plus the college president to back him up at his murder trial (guilty!). But question the infallibility of WELS and the ice curtain comes down faster than rotorless helicopter.

---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed: WELS GA Personali...":

This is an important point, I think. The pastors I've met who are the most die-hard WELS members, not countenancing much criticism of the WELS, if any, are the very people who didn't go through Northwestern Prep, and thus missed an entire unpleasant year in Sexta, and they also profess to not remembering the Bone Cruncher at the Mequon seminary, or much about GA. However, one pastor who fits the above criterion does, however, remember that Northwestern College initiation was quite unpleasant, especially for being forced to lick a toilet plunger. I don't know if it is Stockholm Syndrome, or what.

The reason I bring this up is I reread an old post you linked to today or yesterday, and find that one of your ardent critics, Michael Schottey, professes to not remembering GA. Maybe if Schottey did remember GA, he wouldn't be such an ardent critic of Ichabod. Also, he'd be like many of us and would be leery of ever recommending someone attend a WELS prep school, and if they were going to go anyway, making sure to warn the person what might be in store for him or her.

-----------
http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2009/10/wels-ga-personality.html

Michael Schottey has left a new comment on your post "WELS GA Personality":

After eight years in the prep/MLC system I don't remember GA. Perhaps I was brainwashed and can't remember it.

And perhaps all of my family and friends who have gone through the Seminary are just really good at lying to me.
 
***

GJ - Anyone who criticizes GA is run into the ground. Schottey did not go to seminary, so he had no GA to remember.

During hazing (not GA hazing) one student was knocked unconscious. He remembered.