Friday, March 18, 2011

Commit Whatever Grieves Thee







"Commit Whatever Grieves Thee" by Paul Gerhardt, 1607-1676
1. Commit whatever grieves thee
Into the gracious hands
Of Him who never leaves thee,
Who heaven and earth commands.
Who points the clouds their courses,
Whom winds and waves obey,
He will direct thy footsteps
And find for thee a way.

2. On Him place thy reliance
If thou wouldst be secure;
His work thou must consider
If thine is to endure.
By anxious sighs and grieving
And self-tormenting care
God is not moved to giving;
All must be gained by prayer.

3. Thy truth and grace, O Father,
Most surely see and know
Both what is good and evil
For mortal man below.
According to Thy counsel
Thou wilt Thy work pursue;
And what Thy wisdom chooseth
Thy might will always do.

4. Thy hand is never shortened,
All things must serve Thy might;
Thine every act is blessing,
Thy path is purest light.
Thy work no man can hinder,
Thy purpose none can stay,
Since Thou to bless Thy children
Wilt always find a way.

5. Though all the powers of evil
The will of God oppose,
His purpose will not falter,
His pleasure onward goes.
Whate'er God's will resolveth,
Whatever He intends.
Will always be accomplished
True to His aims and ends.

6. Then hope, my feeble spirit,
And be thou undismayed;
God helps in every trial
And makes thee unafraid.
Await His time with patience,
Then shall thine eyes behold
The sun of joy and gladness
His brightest beams unfold.

7. Arise, my soul, and banish
Thy anguish and thy care.
Away with thoughts that sadden
And heart and mind ensnare!
Thou art not lord and master
Of thine own destiny;
Enthroned in highest heaven,
God rules in equity.

8. Leave all to His direction;
In wisdom He doth reign,
And in a way most wondrous
His course He will maintain.
Soon He, His promise keeping,
With wonder-working skill,
Shall put away the sorrows
That now thy spirit fill.

9. A while His consolation
He may to thee deny,
And seem as though in trial
He far from thee would fly;
A while distress and anguish
May compass thee around,
Nor to thy supplication
An answering voice be found.

10. But if thou perseverest,
Thou shalt deliverance find.
Behold, all unexpected
He will thy soul unbind
And from the heavy burden
Thy heart will soon set free;
And thou wilt see the blessing
He had in mind for thee.

11. O faithful child of heaven,
How blessed shalt thou be!
With songs of glad thanksgiving
A crown awaiteth thee.
Into thy hand thy Maker
Will give the victor's palm.
And thou to thy Deliverer
Shalt sing a joyous psalm.

12. Give, Lord, this consummation
To all our heart's distress;
Our hands, our feet, e'er strengthen,
In death our spirits bless.
Thy truth and Thy protection
Grant evermore, we pray,
And in celestial glory
Shall end our destined way.

Hymn #520
The Lutheran Hymnal
Text: Ps. 37: 5
Author: Paul Gerhardt, 1656
Translated by: composite
Titled: Befiehl du deine Wege
Composer: Hans L. Hassler, 1601
Tune: Herzlich tut mich


Holding the Line Means a Slow Retreat
For the Olde Syn Conference

Thrivent supported the pan-religious stained glass window.



Pastor Sharp has left a new comment on your post "Prove Your Accusations!You Are a Bad Person, So I ...":

My personal beef with Thrivent has to do with their willingness to support Lutherans Concerned (used to be Lutherans Concerned for Gay People), but not Lutherans for Life, because that is an organization with a "political agenda," at least I have been told.

I really do want rock-solid documentation about this, because I would be glad to lead the charge against an organization that a) isn't really that good at what they do and b) doesn't really jive with LCMS values.

Everything we do with the ELCA ends up getting taken over by the ELCA. I know that. A lot of us do. The best you can do is hold the line. I don't think that puts us in fellowship with them and I think that kind of hyperbolic accusation isn't helpful.

---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Prove Your Accusations!You Are a Bad Person, So I ...":

While the link is broken for this page mentioned in the Icha-post:

http://www.cogforlife.org/ppsupporters.htm

The Way Back Machine kept snapshots from 2007 and later. The page in question is a cut and paste of a Planned Parenthood page that lists companies, including Lutheran Brotherhood and Thrivent Financial for Lutherans, that matched employee contributions to Planned Parenthood:

http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20070622165912/http://www.cogforlife.org/ppsupporters.htm

***

GJ - Timid Lutherans think I am wrong for employing polemics. They are quick to find fault with me, but what have their compromises yielded?

The ironic thing is that Hans Fiene and James Sharp jumped on me right away, and Hans un-friended me very quickly. Why not apply the same intolerance to abortion and the Lavender Mafia?

The "conservative" Lutherans are no longer horrified over abortion, but they are terrified about losing a few Thrivent bucks.

Bruce Church likes the details I add to graphics, like Thrivent Chaplain Mark Jeske grinning in the background,
the Jimmy Carter insert,and SUCKERS printed on the check.
Subtlety - I have it.


---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Holding the Line Means a Slow Retreat For the Olde...":

YAWN!

http://www.catholic-forum.com/forums/showthread.php?2058-Businesses-that-support-abortion&s=4a7262c630a26330e9d81c83be57dc79&p=19728#post19728

http://www.exposingtheelca.com/uploads/2/4/2/8/2428588/the_elca_abortion_policy1.pdf

WordAlone - Sexuality task force member reflects on being a cwa member

WordAlone - Sexuality task force member reflects on being a cwa member

As a local bishop, Mark Hanson made sure Anita Hill was ordained.
This action was the beginning of his rise to ELCA bishop and everything that followed.
David Preus and James Crumley now regret the merger, but they enabled the activists.



Sexuality task force member...

...reflects on being a CWA member

Bishop Martin Wells asked those who attended the 2003 Churchwide Assembly in Milwaukee, Wis., to summarize our experiences at churchwide for the benefit of our folks here in the Eastern Washington - Idaho Synod. Here is what I sent to him.– Lou Hesse, Moses Lake, Wash. [A layman serving on the Sexuality Task Force of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA)]

September 12, 2003

First of all, I would like to thank the voting members of the Eastern Washington - Idaho synod for electing me to go as a voting member to the 2003 Churchwide Assembly (CWA) in Milwaukee, Wis. It was an interesting experience and gave me several new insights that should prove helpful on my work for the church on the Sexuality Task Force.
A highlight of the assembly for me was developing closer relationships with other folk. I personally had a number of conversations with people from all over the country about the sexuality issues and other matters of churchwide significance. It was also wonderful to get to know the other members of our "delegation" (although we are not delegates, but voting members, we were always reminded).
Ultimately I think that our personal relationships with our Lord and our neighbors are more meaningful to our faith, and are really what our lives in Christ are all about.
There were many spirits at work in Milwaukee. I arrived late at the assembly due to prior commitments and ended up missing opening worship, but arriving early for lunch. Some of us ended up at a table with an Hispanic fellow who got to telling us about the difficulty of getting a pastor to serve their community. The gist of the conversation was that because of issues of power, wealth, etc., his folks had only had communion eight times in 15 years, because they couldn't get a pastor to preside. Some of us were appalled to the point of telling him to gather the community and have the community choose one of their own to preside at the table. This was probably the most Spirit-filled moment for me at Churchwide, and though it was consistent with our synodical position and Luther's writings on lay presidency, what we told him to do was a clear violation of ELCA policy. The Hispanic fellow thanked us and said the Spirit had guided us to his table.
As to assembly action itself, I think a different spirit prevailed. On questions involving the decentralization of power and authority, I consistently voted for empowering the congregational or synodical expressions of the church. This Churchwide Assembly, however, chose not to share power with anyone.
The ELCA leadership seems to have a different perspective on leadership and power than I do. Power is to be tightly held by "leaders" because, as was stated in the debate several times, congregations or synods "would not vote the same" on these issues. I was surprised by the open, prideful, arrogance at Churchwide, where the opinion that the spirit works most significantly through them is dominant. This kind of thinking I would expect from the Papacy, but I was shocked at finding it so prevalent at Churchwide. In my view, when power is more important than servanthood, we are dealing with the spirit of anti-Christ.
A vote was taken on whether or not to delay the 2005 recommendations from the Sexuality Task Force regarding homosexual practice until after the 2007 vote on a social statement on sexuality in general. While this has much to commend it from the idea of establishing general principles before moving to specific questions, I voted against changing the timeline.
During the presentation on the ELCA budget, a pair of graphs was displayed which showed trends in national membership and benevolence.
Though unstated, it was clear that every time the church has not given a firm "no" to matters concerning homosexual practice, we suffer an increasing rate of membership and benevolence loss. Likewise, when we reaffirmed a more traditional stance regarding homosexual practice in 1994, membership loss slowed and benevolence actually increased. The longer this question is left unresolved, the more damage is done to the church.
As Bishop Hanson pointed out in his final address, the next two years may be the most difficult years the ELCA will experience since its formation. If the issues under consideration mean anything to you, please make your voice heard as clearly as possible at all levels and expressions of the church.
On a number of other issues, the Churchwide Assembly continued to behave as one voting member from Pennsylvania put it, "as the left wing of the Democratic Party gathered in prayer." Implicit in the positions taken in the area of government policy advocacy is the idea that no true Christian could possibly be a political conservative. For all of the talk of "inclusion," the ELCA has a lot of exclusionary policy.
As an example, our new social statement on Health Care calls for all of us to advocate for universal health care.
I'm not a fan of top-down management programs, whether they be Soviet five-year plans for agriculture, the new ELCA evangelism strategy, or strategic plan. I opposed these types of measures that mandate certain policies and actions from local congregations without significant input or empowering of the local expressions. Local decision-makers are nearly always better versed in local options to deal with issues than some far-away person in Chicago or Washington, D.C., might be.
There was a lot of talk of "community," "unity," "inclusion," "advocacy," but I didn't hear much about repentance, one's personal relationship with Jesus Christ, or a need to proclaim the Good News of the death and resurrection of our Lord for the forgiveness of our sins.
Indeed, it was only by a late amendment that "Bible study" was included as an element of the Churchwide Evangelism Strategy. There was plenty of choreographed pomp and pageantry, and people seemed sincerely pious, but ultimately I was disappointed and disturbed by my first time experience at a Churchwide Assembly.

Prove Your Accusations!
You Are a Bad Person,
So I Will Not Respond to the Evidence

More satire! The animation guy un-friended me for showing how Missouri is in fellowship with ELCA and helping to advocate abortion.


I am having an experience which repeats many others. On Facebook a Missouri Synod pastor posted some satire about the difference between Missouri and ELCA. I was working on that with Patsy Leppien when he was still on a trike.

I said it was funny but why stay in fellowship with ELCA? That set off some initial denials from the animation pastor and another Missouri pastor, plus some mocking and accusing statements. I pointed out what Missouri supported by virtue of working with Thrivent, ELCA, and LWR.

Next came the accusations. I was not allowed to say that about abortion and working with ELCA unless I could prove what they should have known as pastors.

Readers know about WELS and Missouri working with ELCA from many different previous posts. I am going to copy and paste so all the content is here for people to read.

WELS Lutherans for Life and Dating Service offered this:

Lutheran Brotherhood Drops Contest That Awarded Pro-Abortion Letter

[Source: LifeNews.com, June 20, 2001]

[Pro-Life Infonet Note: In the April 23, 2001 edition of the Pro-Life Infonet (#2411 ), we reported on an essay contest sponsored by the Lutheran Brotherhood. One of the winners of this contest was a Washington state teen who authored a letter to pro-abortion U.S. Rep. Jennifer Dunn. In his letter, the boy lobbied Dunn to permanently legalize abortion so that parents would have the right to abort unborn children that, through genetic screening, are found to have severe illnesses or disabilities. Hundreds of Pro-Life Infonet readers flooded the Lutheran Brotherhood with calls and emails to express their outrage.

We're pleased to include the following letter from Brad Mattes to the Pro-Life Infonet after tremendous follow-up with Lutheran Brotherhood on his part. Mr. Mattes reports that the Lutheran Brotherhood will no longer participate in the contest in which this student won. Please contact the Lutheran Brotherhood and thank them for taking this action: Lutheran Brotherhood, 625 Fourth Ave. South, Minneapolis, MN 55415, 1-800-990-6290, or email www.cic@luthbro.com or see their web site at http://www.luthbro.com.]


From Brad Mattes:

Sometimes justice and good win out. That has been the case with Lutheran Brotherhood. Perhaps you remember that LB awarded a student a statewide honor for his essay promoting abortion for handicapped babies. The student and his mother were flown to Washington, DC to learn how to lobby on behalf of his pro-abortion political agenda.

Public outcry was substantial and swift, especially on the part of fellow Lutherans. LB was inundated with calls and e-mails condemning this action. As a long-time client of LB, I spent the next several weeks in phone conversations with David Rustad, Manager of Public Relations for LB During those conversations we discussed how their motto, "Linking Faith Values and Money", was not compatible with their latest action. I explained that there would be an aggressive boycott of LB because thousands of us felt betrayed, and, more importantly, their action was contrary to God's will. Several corporations have made the grave mistake of underestimating their customers' dedication to the plight of unborn babies.

I am very happy to report that LB has terminated the controversial program, RespecTeen, as of June 15. LB's reaction was exactly what was asked of them by their pro-life customers. David's letter [to me] reflected a proper attitude on behalf of the company - repentance for their sin. We can, in good conscience, do business with LB, knowing that they now understand the importance of the issue of abortion, as well as other potential controversial issues.

Thanks to all of you who contacted LB. There is no doubt in my mind, after talking with LB representatives, that this truly made the difference! THANK YOU!

Please share this e-mail with those who are aware of LB's mistake, letting them know that LB has made good.

Sincerely for innocent life,
Bradley Mattes, Executive Director
Life Issues Institute

[LifeNews.com— June 21, 2001]

Reprinted with permission by LifeNews.com.

Michele Malkin, a dependable conservative, wrote this:

President Bush posed for pictures this week with a group of politically active teenagers. They were winners of a nationwide letter-writing contest called "RespecTeen Speak for Yourself." The youths received free trips to Washington, D.C., and a chance to meet with members of Congress to push their pet causes. If President Bush had actually read some of the letters from the teen lobbyists-in-training, he would not have had much reason to smile. The award-winning essays supported gun control, opposed educational vouchers for poor children and decried drilling in the Arctic refuge. One of the most disturbing letters came from an eighth-grader in Washington state who pleaded with his congresswoman to make abortion "a guaranteed right." Fourteen-year-old James Humphrey's letter to Rep. Jennifer Dunn, R-WA, was chosen for its "quality and clarity of thought, argument, supporting data, expression, sincerity and originality." He may have been sincere, but his arguments are far from original. I requested a copy of Humphrey's letter from Lutheran Brotherhood, the contest's sponsor. Here's what he wrote: "Abortion needs to be a guaranteed right. New research being conducted in the field of genetics will soon make it possible for a parent to know whether their (sic) child will be born with a serious disease or disability. In the past, this was possible for only a few diseases, but groundbreaking discoveries in the last six months are opening doorways for 'early warning' for devastating diseases." Humphrey goes on to describe the plight of a friend whose young sister died of Rhett's Syndrome. "She couldn't walk, or talk. She had constant seizures, frequent pneumonia, and hardly slept at night ... Her family loved her, but life was exhausting and heartbreaking." Humphrey's friend, he says, "should have the right to decide whether she wants to give birth to a daughter with the disease. I also expect to have the right to make this choice with my future wife. I have an autistic brother ... No one should tell me I have to have a child with this disorder." The letter concludes: "I call for action on your part to help permanently legalize abortion so tragedies like these can be averted and more people do not need to live like this." The pro-abortion movement and the self-centered language of "choice" have so dominated the public conscience that it seems mean-spirited to question the boy's dangerously misguided compassion. We have become obsessed with quality of life at the expense of the sanctity of life. But championing abortion as a government-sponsored method to "avert tragedies" -- that is, to kill undesirable babies -- is not the sign of a merciful society. It is the sign of a cruelly utilitarian one that views "less-than-perfect" human beings as burdensome and disposable.

***

GJ - The responses, within a short period of time, have been, "Life insurance fellowship. Oh noes." And there is the familiar - that was a long time ago, and it was LB, not Thrivent.

Amnesia is a great argument. On TV, they are investigating unsolved murders from 20 to 40 years ago, as cold cases. In the "conservative" Lutheran synods, a church worker murdering his wife is "old news."

LB merged into Thrivent years ago, so that does not count. The boy got his award years ago, so that is irrelevant.

What matters is maintaining a superior attitude toward ELCA while partnering with ELCA in every possible way, staying silent because they are very touchy about criticism.

When Patsy Leppien's book, What's Going On Among Lutherans?, came out, a local Christian book store featured it.

The ELCA pastors saw that and said to the store owner, "If you handle that book, we will stop buying here." The store owner bowed to the boycott.

The "conservative" Lutherans would never do that, because they prefer sanctimony to sanctification.

Churchmouse Campanologist turns 2 today, thanks to you! « Churchmouse Campanologist

Churchmouse Campanologist turns 2 today, thanks to you! « Churchmouse Campanologist



Today, March 17, 2011, Churchmouse Campanologistcelebrated its second anniversary.
May I take this opportunity to thank my loyal readers, subscribers, those who have kindly referenced my posts on their own sites and others who have generously included me on their blogrolls!  I very much appreciate your interest and support!  Also notable were the 34 views from the Holy See (the Vatican) during the past year (check my ClustrMap on the home page before May 2011, at which time I get a new one).


Outside of the Home and About page views, here is a Top 10 listing of posts you have read during the past year, starting from the most popular: Read more at the link.
*** GJ -
Happy Birthday, Church Mouse! No other blog on my list is more productive than CM.
I wrote to CM to note that his Mother Theresa post is consistently listed as one of the top posts on Ichabod, beating out ones from many months before.
His posts are worth reading.

New Bible draws critics of gender-neutral language - Yahoo! News




New Bible draws critics of gender-neutral language - Yahoo! News


AP – Copies of the New International Version Bible is displayed in a book store on Thursday, March 17, 2011, …
– Thu Mar 17, 11:20 pm ET
NASHVILLE, Tenn. – In the old translation of the world's most popular Bible, John the Evangelist declares: "If anyone says, 'I love God,' yet hates his brother, he is a liar." Make that "brother or sister" in a new translation that includes more gender-neutral language and is drawing criticism from some conservatives who argue the changes can alter the theological message.

The 2011 translation of the New International Version Bible, or NIV, does not change pronouns referring to God, who remains "He" and "the Father." But it does aim to avoid using "he" or "him" as the default reference to an unspecified person.

The NIV Bible is used by many of the largest Protestant faiths. The translation comes from an independent group of biblical scholars that has been meeting yearly since 1965 to discuss advances in biblical scholarship and changes in English usage.

Before the new translation even hit stores, it drew opposition from the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, an organization that believes women should submit to their husbands in the home and only men can hold some leadership roles in the church.

***

GJ - The current FICL, I am told, says WELS is going for the new NIV.

WELS has been hag-ridden ever since they lost Dorothy Sonntag, Richard Stadler, and Iver Johnson.

To make up for this incalculable loss, they created a feminist hymnal with feminist Creeds, plus various lobbying groups to make WELS safe for women's ordination. The Brug monstrosity has once again verified that women's ordination is A-OK. He already published that many years ago, but it is direct from God when such opinions appear in a hard-bound book from NPH.

Schmauk Has the Best Observation about the Anti-Confessional Attitude Prevailing Today

Schmauk: The modern radical spirit which would sweep away the Formula of Concord as a Confession of the Church, will not, in the end, be curbed, until it has swept away the Augsburg Confession, and the ancient Confessions of the Church--yea, not until it has crossed the borders of Scripture itself, and swept out of the Word whatsoever is not in accord with its own critical mode of thinking. The far-sighted rationalist theologian and Dresden court preacher, Ammon, grasped the logic of a mere spirit of progress, when he said: "Experience teaches us that those who reject a Creed, will speedily reject the Scriptures themselves."
Theodore E. Schmauk and C. Theodore Benze, The Confessional Principle and the Confessions, as Embodying the Evangelical Confession of the Christian Church, Philadelphia: General Council Publication Board, 1911, p. 685.


Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Very Important - Matters of Indifference - Adiapho...":

so-called matters of indifference may NOT be used during a doctrinal crisis

No Confessional doctrine, no crisis. Know Confessional doctrine, know the crisis.

After many years in the (W)ELS my in-laws now tell me that the Lutheran Confessions were written by sinful men who could have easily made mistakes in the Book of Concord. My reference then to the BOC is questionable at best. They say, look at these pastors who you disagree with, they have over 8 years of college and seminary training, who are you to question or disagree with them. There are twelve different opinions of what the Bible says, how can you say you know and confess the right one?

According to the current (W)ELS belief system God is no longer the authority, the BOC is just another book, Scripture is muddy and gray, the clergy are the authority and their judgment is what sets the norm for doctrine and practice.

It's a pathetic and painful sight.

The Lord's will be done.

***

GJ - If the pastors who went through seven years of training (plus a vicarage year) are so highly educated, then what does that say about someone who has studied that much and more, earning three additional academic degrees? The Olde Syn Conference discounts such an argument because my education is not repeat-after-me training. Worse - I never attended Fuller Seminary, although I visited a CG seminar and went observed Willow Creek and Saddleback, on purpose. I have identified their Lutheran leaders' statements, which are in complete harmony with the Enthusiasts.

The most pernicious argument is this one:

There are twelve different opinions of what the Bible says, how can you say you know and confess the right one?

Mormons use that logic, and so do the Roman Catholics. Both claim that there must be a defining authority. Mormons pretend it is the Book of Mormon, but it is really their weird priesthood (very WELS-like). The Roman Catholic Church finds clarity in the pope's infallible pronouncements (not unlike the ELS).

The bolded statement in red is contrary to the Word of God itself. The Scriptures are the Book of the Holy Spirit, the only revealed will of God. Does God speak with such confusion and lack of clarity that no one can determine what He is saying in His Word? The WELS low-archy would like people to think so. Jay Webber has said as much, claiming that UOJ has to be carefully presented so that the unwashed can grasp it. This repeat-after-me training, which works so well with seals, will always lead people astray.

The Word of God is so clear that anyone can understand and believe in the Christian faith from studying the Scriptures in translation, although bad ones like the NIV, ESV, and RSV distort the clear doctrines on purpose (just as the original RSV from the National Council of Churches changed the Virgin Birth of Isaiah 7:14).

To claim that the barely educated WELS clergy know doctrine better than the laity is a slander against all laity. The laity are not blinded by years of hazing, but want to study and learn for themselves why apostasy is on the throne, truth on the scaffold. The clergy worry about future calls and being undermined in their current ones.

The statement merely shows that the Syn Conference clergy have trained conforming members to be opposed to the Lutheran Confessions. Pietism hates the Book of Concord but loves Fuller, NorthPoint, and Willow Creek.

---

"Shall we permit this to be done! in the name of Christian unity! and by a latitudinarianism that is our own heritage, which rises ever anew from the embers of the past to find such veiled support and strength in the citadel of Zion that Confessionalism is told to whisper low in Jerusalem lest she be heard on the streets of Gath."
Theodore E. Schmauk and C. Theodore Benze, The Confessional Principle and the Confessions, as Embodying the Evangelical Confession of the Christian Church, Philadelphia: 1911, p. 941.

"Is the Lord's Supper the place to display my toleration, my Christian sympathy, or my fellowship with another Christian, when that is the very point in which most of all we differ; and in which the difference means for me everything--means for me, the reception of the Savior's atonement? Is this the point to be selected for the display of Christian union, when in fact it is the very point in which Christian union does not exist?"
Theodore E. Schmauk and C. Theodore Benze, The Confessional Principle and the Confessions, as Embodying the Evangelical Confession of the Christian Church, Philadelphia: 1911, p. 905f.

"The modern radical spirit which would sweep away the Formula of Concord as a Confession of the Church, will not, in the end, be curbed, until it has swept away the Augsburg Confession, and the ancient Confessions of the Church--yea, not until it has crossed the borders of Scripture itself, and swept out of the Word whatsoever is not in accord with its own critical mode of thinking. The far-sighted rationalist theologian and Dresden court preacher, Ammon, grasped the logic of a mere spirit of progress, when he said: 'Experience teaches us that those who reject a Creed, will speedily reject the Scriptures themselves.'"
Theodore E. Schmauk and C. Theodore Benze, The Confessional Principle and the Confessions, as Embodying the Evangelical Confession of the Christian Church, Philadelphia: General Council Publication Board, 1911, p. 685. Trinity

"The real question is not what do you subscribe, but what do you believe and publicly teach, and what are you transmitting to those who come after? If it is the complete Lutheran faith and practice, the name and number of the standards is less important. If it is not, the burden of proof rests upon you to show that your more incomplete standard does not indicate an incomplete Lutheran faith."
Theodore E. Schmauk and C. Theodore Benze, The Confessional Principle and the Confessions, as Embodying the Evangelical Confession of the Christian Church, Philadelphia: 1911, p. 890.

[Selnecker, who wrote "Ach bleib bei uns" (TLH #292) was bitterly attacked and severely persecuted by the Reformed, deposed when Augustus died, reduced to poverty, and not allowed to remain in Leipzig as a private citizen.]
Theodore E. Schmauk and C. Theodore Benze, The Confessional Principle and the Confessions, as Embodying the Evangelical Confession of the Christian Church, Philadelphia: General Council Publication Board, 1911, p. 310ff.

Very Important - Matters of Indifference - Adiaphora

I wonder how many WELS pastors could talk five minutes about Melanchthon.


The Intrepids are showing some leadership by bringing up adiaphora.

More basic to getting justification right is returning to the Lutheran Confessions. I am not sure justification by faith can be discussed intelligently - as long as conference papers by nitwits and faculty books by politicians are the norma normans (ruling norm) of doctrine. Missouri has the same problem, of course. So does the Little Sect. Missouri decided that 1932 was the high point in Lutheran theology and made that particular Brief Statement (among others) their ultimate statement. For some reason, the ELS also agrees with that peculiar and anti-Confessional attitude.

WELS continues to use the adiaphora term to excuse doing whatever they wanted, especially when it came to imitating the worship of Enthusiasts. The Doctrinal Pussycats are quick to latch onto this, showing how unqualified they are to lead.

For example, DP Buchholz continues to "work on" the Church and Change parish, CrossWalk, after three years of muttering threats. The only result has been Gunn and two members elevated to the board of Willowcreek's Liberal College in Milwaukee. And CrossWalk is not even a WELS congregation (unless they slipped it in, without emailing me first).

Buchholz claims there is no Universalism in WELS, but he gave convention paper where he taught Universalism. And that was supposed to be a critique of Kokomo Universalism.

Therefore, the qualifications for a WELS DP not only include "knowing not" but also "knowing not that he knows not." The phrasing is kelmed from Plato, who foresaw people looking at shadows of figures inside the cave as reality and resisting looking outside into the sun. The cave analogy should be called the WELS analogy.

The Key Point of Adiaphora
Those who use adiaphora to justify their spikey hair, jeans, and bad pop music are only proving they have never read the Confessions with discernment.

Since this adiaphora evasion was used during the Interim period, when the Romanists were dominant, the Formula of Concord clearly shows that these so-called matters of indifference may NOT be used during a doctrinal crisis when those rituals are associated with false teachers.

When Olde Syn Conference pastors imitate Willow Creek, Mars Hill, Granger, and NorthPoint, they are violating the Formula of Concord. They clearly identify with those Enthusiasts in worship style and in doctrine. To prove my point, Glende and Ski and Parlow and many others have given the sermons of the Enthusiasts, often verbatim. Doctrinal retreaters like Englebrecht support it.

This one passage shows that the Olde Syn Conference leaders have been and remain in violation of the Formula of Concord, no matter what they claim about their quia subscription to the Book of Concord.

Article X, Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration

10] We believe, teach, and confess also that at the time of confession [when a confession of the heavenly truth is required], when the enemies of God's Word desire to suppress the pure doctrine of the holy Gospel, the entire congregation of God, yea, every Christian, but especially the ministers of the Word, as the leaders of the congregation of God [as those whom God has appointed to rule His Church], are bound by God's Word to confess freely and openly the [godly] doctrine, and what belongs to the whole of [pure] religion, not only in words, but also in works and with deeds; and that then, in this case, even in such [things truly and of themselves] adiaphora, they must not yield to the adversaries, or permit these [adiaphora] to be forced upon them by their enemies, whether by violence or cunning, to the detriment of the true worship of God and the introduction and sanction of idolatry. 11] For it is written, Gal. 5:1: Stand fast, therefore, in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not again entangled in the yoke of bondage. Also Gal. 2:4f : And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage; to whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour, that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

WELS/LCMS Pastor Mark Jeske's DP Al BenkeMoment:
No Discipline at All


Milwaukee Journal Sentinel


Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (WI)



April 20, 2004

Ghosts of scandals past linger as new leaders take charge
FBI investigation leaves many wondering about council as Barrett inaugural dawns

Author: GREG J. BOROWSKI; gborowski@journalsentinel.com, Journal Sentinel

Edition: Final
Section: A News
Page: 1


Article Text:

On a day focused on Milwaukee's future, Mayor-elect Tom Barrett and the 15 aldermen to be sworn in today will be dealing with the ghost of past City Hall scandals.


Barrett and Ald. Willie Hines, expected to be elected council president today, said Monday they hope the latest FBI investigation -- into an alleged bribe taken by an unnamed alderman -- will be resolved quickly, so doubt does not taint the new council.


"When I saw the headline, I thought, 'We don't need another one,' " Barrett said. "It's something nobody in city government wants to see happen."


Barrett, who ran on a clean-up-City Hall theme, said the investigation gives new urgency to passing tougher ethics rules.


During the past term, three aldermen were sent to federal prison -- two on charges of misusing campaign funds and one for misusing federal block grant money. The term was also marked by sexual harassment allegations against then-Mayor John O. Norquist, who left office in January for a new job.


The latest investigation became known last week when a Milwaukee bar owner was charged with bribing an alderman.


Hines is confident the alderman in question is not a part of the new council, and said whoever is being targeted should consider identifying themselves now to remove doubt from the others. He also said the timing of the matter threatens to tarnish the day.


"But it won't succeed," Hines said. "We'll have a great day, a great inaugural, and we will build on the energy that is created."


The formal program begins today at 1:30 p.m., on a stage outside City Hall, 200 E. Wells St. The Milwaukee Children's Choir will begin performing around 1 p.m.


Acting Mayor Marvin Pratt, whom Barrett defeated in the April 6 election, is expected to attend the ceremony. He and Barrett are to walk out of City Hall together at the start of the program.


The two met last week for the first time since the election, which showed a sharp racial split among city voters -- with most blacks backing Pratt and most whites supporting Barrett. Pratt has blamed media coverage of his campaign finance problems and other stumbles for his defeat.


Dignitaries expected to attend include U.S. Sen. Herb Kohl, U.S. Rep. Gerald Kleczka and Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker. Gov. Jim Doyle is unable to attend, though he is sending several cabinet members.


Barrett transition spokesman Joel Brennan said local elected officials, such as state lawmakers and county supervisors, were among the many who were sent invitations. The event is open to the public.


Barrett will be sworn in by Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Louis Butler. The invocation will be delivered by Father Charles Schramm, pastor at St. Sebastian Catholic Church, Barrett's parish.

The benediction will be by Pastor Mark Jeske of St. Marcus Evangelical Lutheran Church. The national anthem, as well as "Lift Every Voice and Sing," will be sung by Sheri Pannell.


During a meeting Monday with several city department heads, Barrett was told that maintaining city operations at current levels would cost about $36 million more next year.


That means significant cuts will have to be found to keep the 2005 budget in line with Barrett's pledge to limit property taxes. He advocates following state Republicans' version of a "freeze," which allows some levy growth to reflect new development.


"I'm sure there are some who don't like the levy freeze position," Barrett said of department heads. "But the position remains."


Barrett said many department heads have indicated that they wish to remain in their posts, but he noted "some changes will be made."


Charges a surprise


Barrett said he was surprised to learn of the federal investigation into a Milwaukee alderman as part of an alleged bribery scheme. Last week, Anderson D. McWillie, owner of AD's Clubhouse, was charged with bribing an alderman in exchange for protection of his liquor license.


The alderman, however, was not named. Nor were two other bars that an unnamed middleman told authorities were part of the scheme.


That led some aldermen last week to call for U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic to say whether the alderman is a returning or departing council member. Biskupic declined.


While he said he hopes the matter is resolved quickly, Barrett noted that the timetable was up to Biskupic: "I'm not going to criticize the U.S. attorney. He's got a job to do. I assume he will do it appropriately."


Hines and others, though, said it is frustrating to have renewed doubt cast on City Hall -- especially if the alderman has already been turned out by voters or is otherwise leaving office.


"I'm very confident the new investigation will have no bearing on the '04 council members," Hines said.


A preliminary hearing in McWillie's case has been set for Thursday.


"The next move is up to the U.S. attorney's office," said Waring R. Fincke, a West Bend lawyer who has been appointed by the Federal Defender Service to represent McWillie.


Fincke refused to discuss the case further and would not say if his client is in negotiations with the U.S. attorney.


In 2000, the council voted 16-0 to suspend McWillie's bar's license for 30 days. In 2002, Ald. Marlene Johnson-Odom, who represented the neighborhood, had it scheduled for a hearing before the Utilities and Licenses Committee. The license was renewed despite objections from some neighbors.


"There should be closure, so those (aldermen) coming in don't have a cloud hanging over their heads on this," said Johnson-Odom, who was defeated in the April 6 election. "I think they should stop playing around with this."

WELS Church Lady Responds


WELS church lady has left a new comment on your post "Jeske Advocated State Slavery":

Seen it! Watched it several times. What made Pastor GJ  FINALLY decide to post this video??? You know what the WELS leadership commented about the video back in 2008? NOTHING! Alex Jones and some of the alternative news people covered this story. There's more that Pastor Jackson is leaving out.(like WAY more). I have been continuously working on some behind the scenes business concerning this specific topic. I will report on the findings at a later date.

In Christ,
from WELS Church Lady

***

GJ - I believe the Jeske video was posted before, but no one (including me) can remember all the 5,000+ posts on Ichabod.

I am creating graphics for those who often post their anonymous comments.

Good News - WELSians - Rob Bell Endorses UOJ

Rob Bell: fussy hair, check; streaked hair, check; twisted smile, check.


From Warren Buffet:

I found this rich quote from Kevin DeYoung's review of Rob Bell's latest train wreck.

http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/kevindeyoung/2011/03/14/rob-bell-love-wins-review/


According to Bell, salvation is realizing you’re already saved. We are all forgiven. We are all loved, equally and fully by God who has made peace with everyone. That work is done. Now we are invited to believe that story and live in it (172–73).


Sounds like UOJ to me!

Twisted smile, check; pre-forgiveness, check; loves every religion but his own, check.
Rob Bell clone? You betcha.

A Better Version of A Mighty Fortress

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

At Least DP Benke Was Disciplined for a Time!



Narrow-minded Lutheran has left a new comment on your post "Prayed with a Priest and a Rabbi? But What Is the Punchline?...":

How many WELS people shook their heads in shame at Benke's unionistic and syncretistic Yankee Stadium performance? This is not to say that WELS is worse than Missouri, but they're no better; yet, many WELS people puff out their chests with pride while putting down the heterodox LCMS. They are just two peas in the ecumenistic Thrivent pod.

Also, I saw no mention of Word and Sacrament in the above "wish list." May I use the new vocab word, Methobapticostal, since the historical Lutheran liturgy is, "stiff, overly formal, unemotional, smotheringly doctrinal?" And there's that head vs. heart deal again. This is too sad to laugh at.

***

GJ - Icha-slang is adding to our rich heritage of English, so feel free to use Methobapticostal, which someone else offered on this blog.

I am always happy to kelm a good idea or word. But I do not hide its origin.

Jeske Advocated State Slavery


grumpy has left a new comment on your post "Prayed with a Priest and a Rabbi?But What Is the P...":

You should willingly become a slave to the political state...I remember that inspiring video...no, the political state won't abuse you once you submit those hard won political freedoms...they will give them back once the situation becomes "normal" again.

Can you imagine if God allowed the same tribulations hitting Japan to hit the United States? How would our spiritual (WELS?) leaders react in such a crisis?

Points to ponder...

Grumpy "getting negative" Lutheran

---

This is what Grumpy was referencing, I think:

Mid-Week Lenten Service - Because We Are Not an Emergent Church



Mid-Week Lenten Vespers


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 7 PM Central Time

The Hymn #292 Lord Jesus Christ 1:2
The Order of Vespers p. 41
The Psalmody Psalm 2 p. 123
The Lection The Passion History

The Sermon Hymn #295 The Law of God 1:93

The Sermon – The Simple Gospel

The Prayers
The Lord’s Prayer
The Collect for Grace p. 45

The Hymn #511 Jesus Shall Reign 1:80


KJV John 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven. 14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: 15 That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.

A Lutheran pastor sent me his summary of Thy Strong Word, and I am going over his remarks. He wanted to know if he was getting it right.

That is the great result of studying God’s Word together. This used to go on all the time, because Lenski was the New Testament expert for The American Lutheran Church, the LCMS, WELS, and ELS. I am not sure that many in the LCA read Lenski, but the rest did and they were a large segment of all Lutherans in America.

At the same time, many are involved in the defining the Gospel correctly – justification by faith alone, apart from the works of the Law.

There are some basic attributes of the Gospel, which we should always keeps in mind when listening to others.

One – The Word is always clear and plain, never obscure. If someone wants to pretend that this matter is so difficult that only pastors can understand it, he is a total fraud and obviously not even vaguely aware of Biblical, Lutheran doctrine. His argument is really Roman Catholic – claiming only the priesthood can interpret the Bible – and then only in the traditions of man.
Two – The Gospel is always comforting, offering blessing and forgiveness. The Gospel message creates and sustains faith, and faith receives the Gospel of forgiveness.

Three – The Holy Spirit has bound Himself to the Word, so nothing is accomplished by God apart from the Word. Only the Word builds up the Kingdom of God. Programs and fads come and go. God works only through His Word.

Four – Everyone wants to speak of God’s grace. Everyone is all for it. The Catholic Church teaches salvation by grace, but one must ask what this means. A closer examination shows that their grace is no grace at all, but a system of works whereby man tries to please God and satisfy His wrath, but never does. No one is ever really forgiven, so that is no grace at all. God’s grace comes to people only through the Holy Spirit in the Means of Grace. Any other claim is pure Enthusiasm.

John 3:16 and the entire section distinguish between those who believe in Christ and those who do not.

Believing is forgiveness, and forgiveness is salvation. John 16’s sermon by Christ shows us in addition that the primary mission of the Holy Spirit (in the Word) is to convict people of the sin of not believing in Him.

This should be understand as utterly trusting in Christ for salvation, because belief as a word has been watered down so much. If a Buddhist believes in Jesus, then the word needs to be changed or modified for clarity. The problem is not with the language but what we have done to the Queen’s English.

Just hearing a reference to John 3:16 is comforting to many people because they remember the words instantly and they know what they mean.

“Whosoever believes in Me shall not perish but have everlasting life.”

Two of our readers have lost someone in the last few weeks. One was sudden. One was drawn out.

The Gospel is the ultimate comfort for loss of life, and this Gospel is taught in every possible way in the hymns, liturgy, and Creeds.

The Gospel is Jesus dying for the sins of the world, rising from the dead, and giving this Gospel to the apostles to teach.

Satan’s message is works. God’s message is grace and forgiveness. Satan offers everything now but enslavement forever. God promises a cross and eternal blessings, even blessings in the cross.

The more we hear the Gospel, the more the New Creation is built up by the Word. When that happens, the New Man generates the fruit of the Spirit, not because we are inherently good, but because the Gospel always has that effect.


Quotations

"How is a person justified before God? This occurs solely by faith in the Son of God, Jesus Christ; that is, freely, not because of any works or merits of one's own but only because of the one Mediator, Jesus Christ, who became the sacrificial victim and propitiation on our behalf. By this sacrifice, man obtained forgiveness of sins and became righteous; that is, God-pleasing and acceptable. His righteousness was imputed to man for Christ's sake, and man becomes an heir of eternal life when he believes with certainty that God gives him these blessings for the sake of His Son."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith (1568), trans., Richard Dinda, Decatur: Repristination Press, 1994. p. 105. Chapt 5.
"Christian righteousness is the forgiveness of sin, the imputation of the righteousness of Christ and acceptance to eternal life. It is free, not the result of any virtues or works but is given solely because of Christ, the Mediator, and apprehended by faith alone."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith (1568), trans., Richard Dinda, Decatur: Repristination Press, 1994. p. 106.
"Scripture therefore uses these words, 'We are justified by faith,' to teach both: 1) What the reason (or merit) for justification is, or what the blessings of Christ are; to wit, that through and for the sake of Christ alone we are granted forgiveness of sins, righteousness and eternal life; and 2. How these should be applied or transferred to us; namely, by embracing the promise and relying on Christ by faith alone."
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith (1568), trans., Richard Dinda, Decatur: Repristination Press, 1994. p. 107. Chapter 5.
"It must be admitted that when our Lutheran Confessions speak of justification they speak almost exclusively of that facet of justification we usually call 'subjective' justification, which has also been called 'special' or 'personal' justification. But the Confessions also show us that the basis for this justification is the justification that precedes faith."
Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 13.
"Here again there is great need to call upon God and pray, 'Dear Father, forgive us our debts.' Not that He does not forgive sin even without and before our prayer; and He gave us the Gospel, in which there is nothing but forgiveness, before we prayed or even thought of it. But the point here is for us to recognize and accept this forgiveness." (LC III:88) Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 13.
"The law would seem to be harmful since it has made all men sinners, but when the Lord Jesus came He forgave all men the sin that none could escape." (Apol. IV, 103) Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 13. "If somebody doubts that his sins are forgiven, he insults Christ because he thinks that his sin is greater and stronger than the death and promise of Christ. (Apol IV, 149) Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 13. "What else is the refusal to believe absolution but the accusation that God is a liar? If the heart doubts, it maintains that God's promsises are uncertain and inane. (Apol. XIII, 62) Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 13. "It is God's command and the Gospel itself that they should be sure that their sins are forgiven freely for Christ's sake, not doubting that they are forgiven them personally. If anyone doubts, he makes the divine promise a lie. (Apol. XIII, 88) Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 13.
"Here the panel feels itself compelled to distinguish between form and content. While the form of the Four Statements is inadequate, the doctrine of objective justification it grapples with is Scriptural. The Four Statements have served to show that there is a doctrinal difference between Faith Congregation and the appellants." Report of the WELS Review Committee, Hartman, Pohlman Appeal, June 30, 1980. Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 133.
"If anybody, therefore, is not sure that he is forgiven, he denies that God has sworn to the truth; a more horrible blasphemy than this cannot be imagined." (Apol. XIII, 94) Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 14. "In answer to a question, Walther made it clear that we are not to absolve those we know will refuse to believe the good news absolution proclaims, but only because this would be a misuse of the Gospel, 'and not for some other reason, as if the Word would not be bringing forgiveness if it is spoken over an impenitent.'" Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 14.
"The fact of the redemption and reconciliation of the entire human race through Christ, and with it the forgiveness of all sins for all men on God's part--which, indeed, is precisely what the Gospel proclaims, presents and gives--can by no means become a lie through the unbelief of men...even when the unbelievers don't receive it, but reject it for themselves and for this reason--indeed, for this reason alone--are lost." Walther's colleague, Theodore Brohm, 1808-1881 Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 16.
"The teaching of the Wisconsin Synod is this, that in and with the universal reconciliation, which has occurred in Christ for the whole world--even Judas; the world--even Judas--has been justified and has received the forgiveness of sin. Therefore, according to Luther's clear words ("for where there is forgiveness of sins, there is also life and salvation"), (even Judas) has become a child of God and an heir of heaven." Quotation from Gottfried Fritschel, "Zur Lehre von der Rechtfertigung," Theologische Monatshefte, vol 4, 1871, (1-24), p. 7. Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 2. Does Curia mean Wisconsin or the Norwegian Synod?
"The chief differences between the contestants [Norwegians and Augustana] seems to have been in the essence rather than in the effect of Absolution. Both agreed that the Gospel offered the forgiveness of sins, but the one side held that it was given only tho those who in faith received it, while the other side said that it was given also to unbelievers, though they did not accept it. Both agreed that unbelievers received no benefit from such an absolution." J. Magnus Rohne, Norwegian Lutheranism up to 1872, New York, Macmillan, p. 231. Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 20.
"So, then, we are reconciled; however, not only we, but also Hindus, and Hottentots and Kafirs, yes, the world. 'Reconciled', says our translation; the Greek original says: 'placed in the right relation to God'. Because before the Fall we, together with the whole creation, were in the right relation to God, therefore Scripture teaches that Christ, through His death, restored all things to the former right relation to God." F. R. Eduard Preuss, 1834-1904, Die Rechtfertigung der Suender vor Gott. Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 24.
"Nowhere in the bible is any man constituted or declared righteous without faith, before faith; all asservations and argumentations to the contrary nothwithstanding." Lenski, Romans, p. 382? Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 86.
"When a man does not repent, he cannot rightly excuse himself with this that he was incapable of doing so. For it is God's gracious will to remove this hindrance, as well as everything which hinders a man's conversion. The cause is only that the man himself would not. Matthew 21:32; 22:4; Psalm 95:8; Isaiah 55:6-7; Acts 7:51; Isaiah 65:2." [Section II, Thesis 18] U. V. Koren, 1884, "An Accounting," Grace for Grace: Brief History of the Norwegian Synod, ed., Sigurd C. Ylvisaker, Mankato: Lutheran Synod Book Company, 1943, p. Isaiah 55:6-7, 65:2; Matthew 21:32; 22:4; Psalm 95:8; Acts 7:51.
"For neither you nor I could ever know anything of Christ, or believe on Him, and obtain Him for our Lord, unless it were offered to us and granted to our hearts by the Holy Ghost through the preaching of the Gospel. The work is done and accomplished; for Christ has acquired and gained the treasure for us by His suffering, death, resurrection, etc. But if the work remained concealed so that no one knew of it, then it would be in vain and lost. That this treasure, therefore, might not lie buried, but be appropriated and enjoyed, God has caused the Word to go forth and be proclaimed, in which He gives the Holy Ghost to bring this treasure home and appropriate it to us. Therefore sanctifying is nothing else than bringing us to Christ to receive this good, to which could not attain ourselves."
The Large Catechism, The Creed, Article III, #38, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 689.
"But outside of this Christian Church, where the Gospel is not, there is no forgiveness, as also there can be no holiness [sanctification]. Therefore all who seek and wish to merit holiness [sanctification], not through the Gospel and forgiveness of sin, but by their works, have expelled and severed themselves [from this Church]."
The Large Catechism, The Creed, Article III, #56, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 693.
"The second argument is that 'God desires all men to be saved' (1 Timothy 2:4), and He gave His Son for us men and created man for eternal life. Likewise: All things exist for man, and he himself exists for God that he may enjoy Him, etc. These points and others like them can be refuted as easily as the first one. For these verses must always be understood as pertaining to the elect only, as the apostle says in 2 Timothy 2:10 'everything for the sake of the elect.' For in an absolute sense Christ did not die for all, because He says: 'This is My blood which is poured out for you' and 'for many'--He does not say: for all--'for the forgiveness of sins.' (Mark 14:24; Matthew 26:28) Martin Luther, Luther's Works, 25 p. 375. 2 Timothy 2:10; 1 Timothy 2:4; Mark 14:24; Matthew 26:28
"In like manner Moses must precede and teach people to feel their sins in order that grace may be sweet and welcome to them. Therefore all is in vain, however friendly and lovely Christ may be pictured, if man is not first humbled by a knowledge of himself and he possesses no longing for Christ, as Mary's Song says, 'The hungry he hath filled with good things; and the rich he hath sent empty away,' Luke 1:53."
Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 149. Matthew 15:21-28; Luke 1:53
"The apostle says 'our,' 'our sins;' not his own sin, not the sins of unbelievers. Purification is not for, and cannot profit, him who does not believe. Nor did Christ effect the cleansing by our free-will, our reason or power, our works, our contrition or repentance, these all being worthless in the sight of God; he effects it by himself. And how? By taking our sins upon himself on the holy cross, as Isaiah 53:6 tells us." Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VI, p. 180. Hebrews 1:1-12; Hebrews 1:3;
"Christ is speaking here not of the word of the law, but of the Gospel, which is a discourse about Christ, who died for our sins, etc. For God did not wish to impart Christ to the world in any other way; he had to embody him in the Word and thus distributed him, and present him to everybody; otherwise Christ would have existed for himself alone and remained unknown to us; he would have thus died for himself. But since the Word places before us Christ, it thus places us before Him who has triumphed over death, sin, and Satan. Therefore, he who grasps and retains Christ, has thus also eternal deliverance from death. Consequently it is a Word of life, and it is true, that whoever keeps the Word shall never see death." Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 177. John 8:46-59.
"To this incline your ears, and be persuaded that God speaks through men and forgives you your sins; this, of course, requires faith." Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed. John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983 II, p. 200. "If I do not believe it, I will not receive its benefits; but that neither renders it false nor proves that anything is lacking in Christ." Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 258. Mark 16:1-8.
"It is a faithful saying that Christ has accomplished everything, has removed sin and overcome every enemy, so that through Him we are lords over all things. But the treasure lies yet in one pile; it is not yet distributed nor invested. Consequently, if we are to possess it, the Holy Spirit must come and teach our hearts to believe and say: I, too, am one of those who are to have this treasure. When we feel that God has thus helped us and given the treasure to us, everything goes well, and it cannot be otherwise than that man's heart rejoices in God and lifts itself up, saying: Dear Father, if it is Thy will to show toward me such great love and faithfulness, which I cannot fully fathom, then will I also love Thee with all my heart and be joyful, and cheerfully do what pleases Thee. Thus, the heart does not now look at God with evil eyes, does not imagine He will cast us into hell, as it did before the HS came...." Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 279. John 14:23-31.
"All who are born into the world of man and woman are sinful under God's anger and curse, condemned to death. For all are conceived and born in sin as Scripture testifies (Psalm 51:5): 'Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.'" Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, The House Postils, 3 vols., ed., Eugene Klug, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1996, II, p. 26. Luke 24:13-35; Psalm 51:5
"The 'rod of His mouth' signifies the spoken Word or the Gospel, which proceeds from the mouth of all whose teaching is pure. It is not inefficacious; it bears fruit; it justifies the godly and destroys the ungodly." [Footnote F. Pieper, Dogmatics, Word of God has twofold effect. It illumines and blinds. I, p. 125.] Martin Luther, What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed. Ewald M. Plass St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, III, p. 1469. Isaiah 11:4
"Christ did indeed suffer for the whole world; but how many are there who believe and cherish this fact? Therefore, although the work of redemption itself has been accomplished, it still cannot help and benefit a man unless he believes it and experiences its saving power in his heart." Martin Luther, What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 705f.
"Objectively speaking, without any reference to an individual sinner's attitude toward Christ's sacrifice, purely on the basis of God's verdict, every sinner, whether he knows about it or not, whether he believes it or not, has received the status of a saint. What will be his reaction when he is informed about this turn of events? Will he accept, or will he decline?" J. P. Meyer, Ministers of Christ, A Commentary on the Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, Milwaukee: Northwestern Publishing House, 1963, p. 103f. 2 Corinthians 5:18-21
"Before Christ's intervention took place God regarded him as a guilt-laden, condemned culprit. After Christ's intervention and through Christ's intervention He regards him as a guilt-free saint." J. P. Meyer, Ministers of Christ, A Commentary on the Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, Milwaukee: Northwestern Publishing House, 1963, p. 107. 2 Corinthians 5:18-21
"This applies to the whole world, to every individual sinner, whether he was living in the days of Christ, or had died centuries before His coming, or had not yet been born, perhaps has not been born to this day. It applies to the world as such, regardless of whether a particular sinner ever comes to faith or not." J. P. Meyer, Ministers of Christ, A Commentary on the Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, Milwaukee: Northwestern Publishing House, 1963, p. 109. 2 Corinthians 5:18-21
"The administration of the katallage is carried out by means of the Word. The Word is made the vehicle for conveying and applying the katallage to the world. There is no other way of administering it...It is the Word which God established through which the katallage is brought to us and through which we bring it to the world." J. P. Meyer, Ministers of Christ, A Commentary on the Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, Milwaukee: Northwestern Publishing House, 1963, p. 110f. 2 Corinthians 5:18-21
[Translation of Gottfried Fritschel article on Justification] ed., Thedore Tappert, Lutheran Confessional Theology in America, 1840-1880, New York: Oxford University Press, 1972,
"This faith, encouraging and consoling in these fears, receives remission of sins, justifies and quickens. For this consolation is a new and spiritual life [a new birth and a new life]. These things are plain and clear, and can be understood by the pious, and have testimonies of the Church [as is to be seen in the conversion of Paul and Augustine]. The adversaries nowhere can say how the Holy Ghost is given. They imagine that the Sacraments confer the Holy Ghost ex opere operato, without a good emotion in the recipient, as though, indeed, the gift of the Holy Ghost were an idle matter."
Article IV., Justification, Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 139.
"Now, that faith signifies, not only a knowledge of the history, but such faith as assents to the promise, Paul plainly testifies when says, Romans 4:16: 'Therefore it is of faith, to the end the promise might be sure.' For he judges that the promise cannot be received unless by faith. Wherefore he puts them together as things that belong to one another, and connects promise and faith."
Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Article IV, Justification, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 135. Romans 4:16.
"But Christ was given for this purpose, namely, that for His sake there might be bestowed on us the remission of sins, and the Holy Ghost to bring forth in us new and eternal life, and eternal righteousness [to manifest Christ in our hearts, as it is written John 16:15: He shall take of the things of Mine, and show them unto you. Likewise, He works also other gifts, love, thanksgiving, charity, patience, etc.]. Wherefore the Law cannot be truly kept unless the Holy Ghost is received through faith...Then we learn to know how flesh, in security and indifference, does not fear God, and is not fully certain that we are regarded by God, but imagines that men are born and die by chance. Then we experience that we do not believe that God forgives and hears us. But when, on hearing the Gospel and the remission of sins, we are consoled by faith, we receive the Holy Ghost, so that now we are able to think aright."
Augsburg Confession, Article III, #11, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 159.
"But as the Confutation condemns us for having assigned these two parts to repentance, we must show that [not we, but] Scripture expresses these as the chief parts in repentance and conversion. For Christ says, Matthew 11:28: Come unto Me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Here there are two members. The labor and the burden signify the contrition, anxiety, and terrors of sin and of death. To come to Christ is to believe that sins are remitted for Christ's sake; when we believe, our hearts are quickened by the Holy Ghost through the Word of Christ. Here, therefore, there are these two chief parts, contrition and faith." Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Article XII (V), #44, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 263. Matthew 11:28.
"Against both these parties the pure teachers of the Augsburg Confession have taught and contended that by the fall of our first parents man was so corrupted that in divine things pertaining to our conversion and the salvation of our souls he is by nature blind, that, when the Word of God is preached, he neither does nor can understand it, but regards it as foolishness; also, that he does not of himself draw nigh to God, but is and remains an enemy of God, until he is converted, becomes a believer [is endowed with faith], is regenerated and renewed, by the power of the Holy Ghost through the Word when preached and heard, out of pure grace, without any cooperation of his own." Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, II. 5. Free Will Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 881.
"The third controversy which has arisen among some theologians of the Augsburg Confession is concerning the righteousness of Christ or of faith, which God imputes by grace, through faith, to poor sinners for righteousness." Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III. 1 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 917. "...it has been unanimously taught by the other teachers of the Augsburg Confession that Christ is our righteousness not according to His divine nature alone, nor according to His human nature alone, but according to both natures; for He has redeemed, justified, and saved us from our sins as God and man, through His complete obedience; that therefore the righteousness of faith is the forgiveness of sins, reconciliation with God, and our adoption as God's children only on account of the obedience of Christ, which through faith alone, out of pure grace, is imputed for righteousness to all true believers, and on account of it they are absolved from all their unrighteousness." Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III. 4 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 917.
"If this only article remains pure on the battlefield, the Christian Church also remains pure, and in goodly harmony and without any sects; but if it does not remain pure, it is not possible that any error or fanatical spirit can be resisted." Dr. Luther Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III. 4 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 917. "These treasures are offered us by the Holy Ghost in the promise of the holy Gospel; and faith alone is the only means by which we lay hold upon, accept, and apply, and appropriate them to ourselves. This faith is a gift of God, by which we truly learn to know Christ, our Redeemer, in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him, that for the sake of His obedience alone we have the forgiveness of sins by grace, are regarded as godly and righteous by God the Father, and are eternally saved." Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III 10 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 919.
"Therefore it is considered and understood to be the same thing when Paul says that we are justified by faith, Romans 3:28, or that faith is counted to us for righteousness, Romans 4:5, and when he says that we are made righteous by the obedience of One, Romans 5:19, or that by the righteousness of One justification of faith comes to all men, Romans 5:18. For faith justifies, not for this cause and reason that it is so good a work and so fair a virtue, but because it lays hold of and accepts the merit of Christ in the promise of the holy Gospel; for this must be applied and appropriated to us by faith, if we are to be justified thereby." Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III 12 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 919. Romans 4:5; Romans 3:28; Romans 5:19
"Accordingly, the word justify here means to declare righteous and free from sins, and to absolve one from eternal punishment for the sake of Christ's righteousness, which is imputed by God to faith, Philippians 3:9. For this use and understanding of this word is common in the Holy Scriptures of the Old and the New Testament. Proverbs 17:15: He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the Lord. Isaiah 5:23: Woe unto them which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him! Romans 8:33: Who shall lay anything to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth, that is, absolves from sins and acquits." Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III 17 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 921 Philippians 3:9; Proverbs 17:15; Isaiah 5:23; Romans 8:33
"This righteousness is offered us by the Holy Ghost through the Gospel and in the Sacraments, and is applied, appropriated, and received through faith, whence believers have reconciliation with God, forgiveness of sins, the grace of God, sonship, and heirship of eternal life." Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III 16 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 921. "For when man is justified through faith [which the Holy Ghost alone works], this is truly a regeneration, because from a child of wrath he becomes a child of God, and thus is transferred from death to life, as it is written; When we were dead in sins, He hath quickened us together with Christ, Ephesians 2:5. Likewise: The just shall live by faith, Romans 1:17; Habakkuk 2:4." Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III 20 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 921.
"Moreover, neither contrition nor love or any other virtue, but faith alone is the sole means and instrument by which and through which we can receive and accept the grace of God, the merit of Christ, and the forgiveness of sins, which are offered to us in the promise of the Gospel." Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III 31 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 925. "Here belongs also what St. Paul writes Romans 4:3, that Abraham was justified before God by faith alone, for the sake of the Mediator, without the cooperation of his works, not only when he was first converted from idolatry and had no good works, but also afterwards, when he had been renewed by the Holy Ghost, and adorned with many excellent good works, Genesis 15:6; Hebrews 11:8. And Paul puts the following questions, Romans 4:1ff.: On what did Abraham's righteousness before God for everlasting life, by which he had a gracious God, and was pleasing and acceptable to Him, rest at that time? Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III 33 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 927. Romans 4:3; Romans 4:1ff; Genesis 15:6; Hebrews 11:8
"For good works do not precede faith, neither does sanctification precede justification. But first faith is kindled in us in conversion by the Holy Ghost from the hearing of the Gospel.This lays hold of God's grace in Christ, by which the person is justified. Then, when the person is justified, he is also renewed and sanctified by the Holy Ghost, from which renewal and sanctification the fruits of good works then follow." Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III 41 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 929,
"If remission of sins without repentance is preached, the people imagine that they have already forgiveness of sins, and thereby they are made secure and unconcerned. This is a greater error and sin than all error of former times, and it is verily to be feared that we are in that danger which Christ points out when He says, Matthew 12:45: 'The last state of that man shall be worse than the first.'" C. F. W. Walther, The Proper Distinction Between Law and Gospel, trans., W. H. T. Dau, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1928, p. 123. Matthew 12:45.
"Christ's Glorious Resurrection from the Dead the Actual Absolution of the Entire Sinful World Here I would point out two things: 1. That This Is Certain And True, and 2. That Therefore Every Man Who Wants To Be Saved Must By Faith Accept This General Absolution As Applying Also To Him," C. F. W. Walther, The Word of His Grace, Sermon Selections, "Christ's Resurrection--The World's Absolution" Lake Mills: Graphic Publishing Company, 1978 J-5 p. 230. Mark 16:1-8 "For God has already forgiven you your sins 1800 years ago when He in Christ absolved all men by raising Him after He first had gone into bitter death for them. Only one thing remains on your part so that you also possess the gift. This one thing is--faith. And this brings me to the second part of today's Easter message, in which I now would show you that every man who wants to be saved must accept by faith the general absolution, pronounced 1800 years ago, as an absolution spoken individually to him." C. F. W. Walther, The Word of His Grace, Sermon Selections, "Christ's Resurrection--The World's Absolution" Lake Mills: Graphic Publishing Company, 1978 J-5 p. 233. Mark 16:1-8
"Objectively speaking, without any reference to an individual sinner's attitude toward Christ's sacrifice, purely on the basis of God's verdict, every sinner, whether he knows it or not, whether he believes it or not, has received the status of saint." (J. P. Meyer, Ministers of Christ, p. 103) WELS, Kokomo Four Statements, 1979. 001
"After Christ's intervention and through Christ's intervention God regards all sinners as guilt-free saints." (J. P. Meyer, Ministers of Christ, p. 107) WELS, Kokomo Four Statements, 1979. 002
"When God reconciled the world to Himself through Christ, He individually pronounced forgiveness to each individual sinner whether that sinner ever comes to faith or not." (J. P. Meyer, Ministers of Christ, p. 109) WELS, Kokomo Four Statements, 1979. 003 "At the time of the resurrection of Christ, God looked down in hell and declared; Judas, the people destroyed in the flood, and all the ungodly, innocent, not guilty, and forgiven of all sin and gave unto them the status of saints." (Pastor Charles Papenfuss) WELS, Kokomo Four Statements, 1979. 004