Thursday, October 18, 2012

Martin Luther Never Endorsed John 1:29 as Red Meat for UOJ



I was studying the Kregel edition of Luther's Galatians Commentary, waiting in the doctor's office. This was more involved, with a new specialist, so I had plenty of time.

As I wrote many times before, Galatians is large and dense because it is a commentary on the entire Bible, not just the verses in Galatians. The book is a summary of Luther's Gospel teaching, aimed at preventing errors in the future.

The Book of Concord and Luther agreed in seeing Galatians as a definitive statement about Christian doctrine and the Chief Article, which is justification by faith, not justification without faith.

Those who parade around as experts on justification, quoting John 1:29 to prove their point, should read the Galatians Commentary on John 1:29, starting page 165 in the Kregel paperback edition. It can be found in the section on Galatians 3:13.

I am simply going to mention this now, and go into detail later. John 1:29, according to Luther, does not mean "bear the sins of the world" in the sense of absolving all unbelievers, as the UOJ Hive claims.
The UOJ dogma is another case of turning the meaning of a passage upside-down. The UOJ spin can certainly qualify as a fallacy of emphasis, by inventing a world absolution when the revelation is about atonement.

I know everyone has a Kregel, so they can go over those pages carefully before I write more.


Profile of Jack Kilcrease, "Theologian of the Church" - His Words.
Favorite Movies Kilcreased - The Ichabod Effect


http://www.blogger.com/profile/11362736419613180038




The Passion of the Christ,

Indiana Jones series,

Fight Club,

Apocalyse Now,

Ghost Busters,

Magnolia,

Boogie Nights, [absent below]

Punk Drunk Love,

Rushmore,

Royal Tannenbaums,

Kill Bill (Vols. I & II), [absent below]

Pulp Fiction,

Team America: World Police, [absent below]

Office Space,

Old School,

Zoolander,

Flirting with Disaster,

Dune,

Being John Malkovich,

Adaptation,

Blade Runner.

----

List at 6 PM today:

The Passion of the Christ, 

---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Profile of Jack Kilcrease, "Theologian of the Chur...":

Theologian of the Church?

Is this an American practice of taking one's self seriously or is it just Jack Kilcrease? I think it is more of the latter.

Jack has a habit of inventing titles and applying it to himself. There was one time he described himself as UOJ par excellence, if I recall reading from his old posts.

LPC 

***

GJ - Do not blame America for Kilcrease, Dr. Cruz. The UOJ fraternity is known for self-puffery, so I blame Walther and Pietism. For instance, his UOJ pal, Paul Without A Call McCain, posted a completely copied post about Ignatius Antiochus. The first part was directly from the LCMS server, the second from the Roman Catholic site for the Catholic Encyclopedia. He let through a comment that talked about "your post." How it it "your post" when it is all copied?

I have an interesting comparison chart developing. Maybe I can finish it today.

---

Pastor Joel Lillo, WELS has left a new comment on your post "Profile of Jack Kilcrease, "Theologian of the Chur...":

LPC,

What Greg did here was to reproduce for all the world to see (or at least for the dozen or so people who read this blog) Jack's list of movies he likes from his blogger profile.

Which brings up my original question to Greg: "And your point is...?"

***

GJ - Pastor Joel Lillo (Appleton area, WELS) seems unaware that the blogger profile is published for everyone to see. It is Jack Kilcrease's description of himself and his passions. Several readers have already wondered why a "theologian of the Church" considers Boogie Nights as a favorite film, since it glamorizes a porn star who died of AIDS.

Or - Jack did consider the film a favorite. The before and after list is interesting on its own.

Lillo and Kilcrease seem to read Ichabod every day, as many do. Page-views have changed from 2,000 per day to around 3,000 per day in the last week.

Normally, it takes a felony arrest in WELS to move the numbers up that much at once.

---

narrow-minded has left a new comment on your post "Profile of Jack Kilcrease, "Theologian of the Chur...":

What's the big deal, you legalists? Don't you know the porn star who died of AIDS, most likely in a state of unrepentance, was forgiven two-thousand years ago?

***

GJ - Readers can see why I copy and paste blog material. The authors quickly erase what they previously boastfully published, blaming me for increasing their page-views by linking their blogs and copying their deathless prose.

Happy Birthday, Dr. John Warwick Montgomery.
American Lutheranism Went To Pot When You Moved To Europe

Dr. Montgomery is licensed to practice law
in England, Wales, France,
California, DC, and the US Supreme Court.
John Warwick Montgomery earned doctorates in theology at the University of Chicago and at Strausberg. He has earned 10 degrees in all. His academic progress seemed to accelerate as he moved along. He graduated from Hamma Divinity, LCA, and taught at Waterloo Lutheran University, where I went to seminary. I believe he was the professor at WLU who nailed a famous speaker to the floor by a series of questions that led the poor Leftist to admit the opposite of what he had just tried to teach. I was awed by that and later concluded it could only have been Montgomery.

He worked with Walter Martin, a noted defender of the Christian faith. At some point he read the works of Lutheran orthodoxy and left the LCA. I know he investigated joining the Little Sect on the Prairie, but they are notoriously allergic to earned degrees and academic merit.

Montgomery has published more books than an entire faculty and practiced law in defense of the rights of Christians. My wife and I had lunch with him at the Chicago Inerrancy Conference, where we were leaving the LCA. It seems like yesterday.

(One LCMS pastor at that conference, who knew Al Barry as a district president, said, "Barry will do nothing about doctrine as the Synod President, because he has done nothing here, even when the facts were put before him.")

Montgomery meddled with my life much earlier than the Chicago Inerrancy Conference, which was probably about 1987. I was in Sturgis, Michigan, inheriting an entire library of books from a Missouri pastor who suddenly left the ministry. The books were being tossed away, so a member brought them to me - cartons and cartons of them. I gave many away to various people, including my dissertation advisor at Notre Dame, John Howard Yoder.

One book was a two-volume work, edited by Montgomery,  about the decline of the Lutheran Church. One of the contributors was an LCA missionary by the name of Faust. We knew his son at Augustana, and Pastor Faust was related to my father's best friend, aka Snortin' Norton, whose son was also an Augustana classmate. There are no degrees of separation in the Lutheran Church.

The Faust essay really struck home, because that was a man I knew, someone who preached at Salem in Moline, the congregation where I was confirmed. I read the book, which confirmed my suspicions about the departure of the LCA from the Biblical foundations of the Christian faith.

That thrown-away book began my movement out of the LCA, where only one side was ever presented.

But there is another connection besides. I included Montgomery on my mailing list for Martin Chemnitz Press, long ago. He was kind enough to order all my books. I said free shipping with large orders, and he availed himself of that discount. I recall the note on his order.

American Lutherans did not take advantage of Montgomery's vast learning. He said on his Facebook page:

At the same time, in the States, I find that a fair number of churchy Protestants, including evangelicals, think that salvation is a matter of leading the right kind of life, being sanctified, manifesting spiritual gifts--rather than relying on the sufficient sacrifice of Our Lord on the Cross . . . (To clarify, we live in the French Alsace, where Lutheranism is predominant.)
I went back to check on that page and saw that Moline classmate Michael Bauman, Hillsdale College, also wished John a happy birthday. Bauman is also involved in apologetics.

Montgomery is a prime example of a man who has dedicated his life to arguing the truth, no matter what.



---

narrow-minded has left a new comment on your post "Happy Birthday, Dr. John Warwick Montgomery. Ameri...":

The pastor in Barry's district was certainly correct. Although he talked "confessional" and was correct on the social issues, Barry allowed CG and the Charismatic movements in the LCMS.

Steadfast UOJers, Walther Quest, and the rest of self-proclaimed "confessionals" are now happy because they once again have their guy on the SP Throne. This just goes to show that political power is more important than being truly Lutheran. I predicted two years ago that Mustachio Matt would be a repeat of Barry.

Instead of schmoozing with and aping the Methobapticostals under Kieschnick, the LCMS will now favor schmoozing with Rome/Constantinople. Be it "follow the bouncing ball on the screen" praise bands, or bells and smells, it doesn't matter as long as we're ABL (Anything but Lutheran).

Are Babtists ashamed of being Baptist? Are Methodists ashamed of being Methodist? The ECUSA, despite their imminent demise, is proud to be ECUSA. Rome and Constantinople don't apologize much. Why does the "Lutheran" SynCon seemed to be ashamed of being Lutheran?

Given the history and the establishment of the SynCon, I guess I shouldn't be shocked. Pietism is truly our default religion.

***

GJ - Given the enrollment of SynCon leaders, the promotion of those graduates from heretical seminaries, and the adoption of their idiotic ideas, it is difficult to imagine how the LCMS, WELS, or ELS could criticize anyone about anything.

When the LutherQuest (sic) bunch was jumping on me for synodical memberships, I pointed out that their hero, Al Barry, started in a church basement seminary in the Twin Cities, went to Bethany Seminary in Mankato, vicared in WELS, and became LCMS. However, those facts never emerge in his Concordia Historical Institute bio.

Liars  do not give up their lying habits.

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

The Last Radicals - NR / Digital Articles - National Review Online

Photo credit: Liz Copeland.


The Last Radicals - NR / Digital Articles - National Review Online:

There is exactly one authentically radical social movement of any real significance in the United States, and it is not Occupy, the Tea Party, or the Ron Paul faction. It is homeschoolers, who, by the simple act of instructing their children at home, pose an intellectual, moral, and political challenge to the government-monopoly schools, which are one of our most fundamental institutions and one of our most dysfunctional. Like all radical movements, homeschoolers drive the establishment bats.

'via Blog this'

***

GJ - I usually ignore National Review, for many reasons. However, this author makes a good point.

We home-schooled about 30 years ago and loved it. People wondered about how that could possibly work out. I suggested that most wealthy people had their children tutored at home, that Alexander the Great was educated that way. Alex did well, and so did our son.

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "The Last Radicals - NR / Digital Articles - Nation...":

Ichabod -

Wonderful feline pic! Looks just like our domestic shorthair!

***

GJ - Liz is a childhood friend of the family. My mother and her mother taught in the same gradeschool, Garfield. I grew up among teachers and teachers' kids, went to PTA meetings for the desserts, studied in the school library during teachers' meetings. The Jackson kids went to school early, walking to Garfield with mom. It was more like a forced march in the military.

Liz is a very talented nature photographer, and she is a retired teacher.

---

rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "The Last Radicals - NR / Digital Articles - Nation...":

Thank you for posting this. We were placed into a position where my wife is now home schooling our autistic son. There is a very active home schooling association near us, which draws from a large geographical area. Our son's former senior behavioral therapist, now a public school teacher, could not grasp the home schooling concept. She kept inferring that their is no regulation in place to deal with "deadbeat parents" who homeschool their children. I countered that with the suggestion that there are many deadbeat parents who send their children to public schools, which are highly regulated. It seems that homeschooling is done by parents who are willing to take on tremendous sacrifice because they love the children that the Lord has blessed them with.

***

GJ - I was homeschooled in a sense. My mother made sure I grew up with a library of books for all ages, subscribing to several different book clubs for youth. My father was very interested in politics and read in that area all the time. I attended many extra educational events, sometimes voluntarily.

My argument for homeschooling is - the teachers love their children, which is often not the case in the public system. There are head-cases in parochial schools too. Our son's teachers in two parochial schools were 50% - half of them terrific, half of them awful. I interviewed potential teachers for an area Christian school - dumber than rocks. I asked, "Who is C. S. Lewis?" Anger erupted - "Why do I need to know that?"

I am not surprised at the therapist's reaction, above. Homeschooling is a major threat to our socialist educational system, which is no better under the banner of charter schools. "Where the money is, there will the apostates be gathered." - The Gospel of Mark Jeske, 3:14.

Homeschooling means tailoring the education to the individual student and spending far more hours in education. We ran our effort seven days a week, all year, by request. Some results: fluency in Latin and Greek, a beginning in Hebrew. At least 100 significant books were read, such as the Iliad and the Odyssey. It also creates priceless moments.

I would dismantle 90% of the educational system and give the tax money back to the parents. The recipients could then spend the money exactly as they wished. No govmint charter schools. No requirement for a phony, bad education.



More Catholic Than the Pope - LCMS



bruce-church (http://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "CPH Apocrypha - Best Pub Since the Book of Concord...":

The LCMS is going to have their youth gathering at a Catholic university (SLU), and President Harrison invites the youth from this very Catholic-looking office with about 50 crucifixes behind him.

I'd say having anymore than one crucifix per square meter of wall space is getting RCC, and Harrison has about 10 per meter. That's also why McCain loves working at CPH since there's about 400 crucifixes on display (for sale) at any one time. Also, Catholic St. Louis has the cemeteries with many stone crucifixes, even in the cemeteries for all the Bronze Age Lutherans (as Paul stated in his Walther mausoleum video):

CAMPUS MINISTRY Unwrapped Gathering on Jan 2, 2013:

http://www.lcms.org/page.aspx?pid=1380

LCMS President invites college students to attend "Unwrapped":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tsOHdD90jk 


Father Neuhaus became very important to LCMS seminary faculty and students,
once he formally became the Roman Catholic he always was.

Pope Paul Without a Call Installs CPH proof-readers at the Purple Palace.
Is that installation valid?

Few realize that McCain controls the aiming device in this photo.
---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "More Catholic Than the Pope - LCMS":

Ichabod and bruce-church:

Thank you for posting all this. The mystery [for me] has been finally unravelled; that is, for SP Harrison.

I've finally figured it out; the reason for SP Harrison's shovel ready mustache! The clue is his obvious fetish for crucifixes. His snow plow mustache readily hides his chapped lips.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tsOHdD90jk

As for CPH'S McNasty, I still do not have an explanation for his Mother Mary lactation fascination fetish. Maybe one of these days a McCaininite defector will reveal that to us.

***

GJ - I don't think defectors are allowed to live, Nathan.

Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed: More Bilge from WELS Church Growth Stars.
Sound Familiar? Cal-Arizona WELS DP Five Years Ago



Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed: More Bilge from WELS Church Growth Stars:


THURSDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2007


More Bilge from WELS Church Growth Stars



The following is a verbatim quotation from Motley Magpie. Wisconsin Synod gave the Left Foot of Fellowship to the the Berg brothers, sons of Fuller veteran Norm Berg:

In businessman-like fashion, businessman Eberle predictably gets to the bottom line - the bottom line, “our outflow is greater than our inflow” (p. 8). While giving the Spirit his due he argues, “but numerous verses in Scripture can be quoted showing that the Lord expects results” (p. 10) that is, net growth. Given that he states, “I submit that any WELS congregation can grow as fast, or faster, than the fastest growing congregation in its community” (p. 9). He then adds the sweeping appraisal of an unidentified (and evidently well informed) WELS pastor,

Most [WELS pastors] are loathe (sic) to even consider that mega-churches in our area grow because they are well-led, high-performance, high-expectation, high-quality organizations. The fact that these [mega-churches] are theologically more conservative than us and more demanding of their members is conveniently ignored (p. 9)

- to which Mr. Eberle adds, “Since this is the case, it begs the question - Why aren’t there any WELS mega-churches?”

To state it syllogistically: conservative churches grow; the WELS is conservative; therefore, WELS churches should grow, and their “conservatism” should not be used as an excuse for “failure” (p. 11). Mr. Eberle is not the first to make this argument in the Wisconsin Synod. It was made in an 1985 essay with the admittedly improbable title “How to Make Sound Doctrine Sound Good to Mission Prospects” by the Rev. Paul Kelm and in a 1987 essay, “The Call into the Discipling (sic) Ministry” by the Rev. Joel Gerlach who cites, then WELS executive secretary of evangelism,

Kelm, who noted that it requires 103 WELS communicants to enlist one new adult confirmand per year… [for] the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod… 73 communicants for each new confirmand, [and] the figure for the Assemblies of God (currently the fastest growing Protestant denomination in the USA) is 20 for each new member2 (see the footnote examination of this “statistic”).

Rev. Gerlach concludes,

Thereby hangs the tale. Apparently WELS Lutherans (sic) are not as determined as members of other denominations to become involved personally in sharing their faith with others.

For himself Kelm dismisses the heterodoxy-is-why-the-heterodox-grow factor this way,

True, [fast-growing conservative, biblical churches] may not be fully orthodox; but I fail to see where baptism by immersion and assorted other Protestant departures are any drawing card. In fact, growing churches are typically those whose doctrines and expectations of members are strict” (p. 2).

As if reading from the same script, Mr. Eberle dismisses the “rationalization” that only the apostate grow,

Churches identified as fundamentalist or orthodox have grown, often at an amazing pace. For these churches, orthodoxy seems to be an asset that assists growth, rather than hinders it. Surely you and I don’t believe that the pure Gospel, as taught within the WELS, is an impediment to growth (p. 9)?

So - this naïve definition of “orthodox” aside - a commonality of conservatism (strictness!), a few “assorted Protestant departures” aside, shows that conservative WELS ought to grow, “citius, altius, fortius” - contingent, I suspect, on whether it ingests new church growth hormones, the methods of growing churches.


***

GJ - I know a WELS pastor who dared take issue with Eberle. Soon District Pope Jahnke fired him this way. "I can fire you on the spot or you can voluntarily resign and get three months pay."

Let us consider the solemn declarations of Mr. Eberle, an expert on all churches due to his experience in mass mailings. Kelm is now at the mega-church of Eberle's dreams. Is it Lutheran? No. Is it conservative? No. The congregation appears to be a clone of Robert Schuller's generic, liberal pan-Protestant congregation in California.

Studies have shown...I love to use that phrase. Studies have shown that mega-churches simply take people from other congregations, the way mega-stores take people from Mom and Pop stores. The Church Growth Movement has done nothing to increase the total number of Christians in America. The four-letter synods (ELCA, LCMS, WELS) have slavishly followed Church Growth for decades and they have failed. Once healthy denominations are strangled by high costs, membership decline, low clergy morale, and lawsuits from adulterous Church Growth pastors.


'via Blog this'


WELS DP Jon Buchholz Justifies Himself Today in Phoenix.
Where Is the Paper?



narrow-minded has left a new comment on your post "Reactions to DP Jon Buchholz Suspending Pastor Ryd...":

A post from Pr. Scheer from the above cited link: "In regards to the situation for Pr. Rydecki, he will not be writing more for Steadfast Lutherans. It was a mutual decision. Some of the information about his situation is still coming out. Because of these facts, his situation should best be discussed elsewhere."

I wondered how long Pr. Rydecki would last for failing to properly venerate Walther.

By the way, since Walther was assumed, was he also immaculately conceived?

Rewards the Calvinists,
punishes the Lutherans.
"Go back and read Bente's section on the Crypto-Calvinists.
I did, Buchie, and you are there.
---

David Becker has left a new comment on your post "WELS DP Jon Buchholz Justifies Himself Today in Ph...":

I sent the following item to Christian News today. Pastor Rydecki confirmed its accuracy via e-mail:

Paul Rydecki's Church Leaves WELS, He Remains Pastor

The October 15 Christian News reported that Rev. Paul Rydecki was suspended as a Pastor in the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod. He remains pastor of Emmanuel Lutheran Church in Las Cruces, New Mexico. That church now lists itself as “an independent confessional Lutheran congregation.” His church voted to disaffiliate from WELS on October 17, and that allowed Rydecki to remain as pastor there.

The following is a statement from Paul Rydecki commenting on his suspension as a pastor in the WELS.

(I then gave CN Pastor Rydecki's statement at this link: http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2012/10/suspended-from-wels-why.html)

---


Links about Justification by Faith 
and Justification without Faith (UOJ)



Luther's Galatians endorsed by reader

Luther's Galatians on Gnesio Lutherans

Roman Catholic adjunct Jack Kilcrease as Humpty Dumpty

Calov, quoted by Robert Preus, repudiated the UOJ position of WELS

Kilcrease, the McCain tutor, equivocates.

Buchholz is anti-Luther

Pastor Bickel on Tossing Rydecki Under the Bus

Church and Changer Jeff Gunn and His Mequon Class of Shrinkers

Paul McCain and Jon Buchholz - Bedfellows of Apostasy

Abraham Is the Common Theme in Justification - Justification by Faith

Pastor Rydecki's Account of His Suspension - October 9th

Intrepid Account October 6th- Pastor Rydecki Suspended

LutherQuest (sic) Opposes Justification by Faith

Warming Up the Tar and Feathers on LutherQuest (sic)

Pastor Bickel Answers Jon Buchholz

Kokomo Statements - WELS UOJ - JP Meyer

Jack Kilcrease Showing Signs of Stress

Dr. Lito Cruz and Brett Meyer Dispatch the UOJ Stormtroopers on Extra Nos

Hunnius repudiated an early form of UOJ,
backed by P. Leyser, an editor of the Book of Concord,
a biographer of Chemnitz, and an early expert on justification.



CPH Apocrypha - Best Pub Since the Book of Concord with More Recall Notices Than a Ford Pinto?




narrow-minded has left a new comment on your post "Paul McCain Promotes Apocrypha and Roman Catholic ...":

Since "No Call Paul" can't discern the Canonical Scriptures, and since his BOC was rejected (even by the mostly-UOJ profs), the CPH Apocrypha should be a hoot. Drink some more breast milk and kiss the Pope's ring, Paul.

While Luther cited the Apocrypha as good reading, he certainly did not consider it Canonical. Perhaps the LCMS/(W)ELS should properly discern the Canonical Scriptures, the BOC, and address their errors in doctrine and practice before taking on the Apocrypha.

I recall a parish in my district that frequently hosted vicars. Most of them went to Eastern Orthodoxy. The pastor was teased about what he did to cause the defections by other pastors, but I largely blame the Rome/EO education from The Fort.

***

GJ - One graduate of The Surrendered Fort said Eastern Orthodoxy was "just a matter of polity."

McCain posted an altered version of The Miraculous Lactation of Mary on his blog,
so Team Ichabod restored it and added Father McCain and the motto.

The scandal of crypto-Calvinism was having Calvin's books promoted in Wittenberg and Luther's shoved to the back. The Elector promoted Calvinists and punished Lutherans - just like SP Mark Schroeder and the Twelve Apostles (DPs) who hear revelations from the Holy Spirit echoing in their empty heads.

Northwestern Publishing House has admitted in print that crypto-Calvinism is no longer crypto.

The same can be said about those sinuflecting to Rome and Constantinople.

Johann Gerhard on Romans 5:18


http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2012/10/johann-gerhard-on-romans-518.html#comment-form


Johann Gerhard on Romans 5:18


Yesterday I posted a translation of Johann Gerhard on Romans 3 and on Romans 4.  Here's a translation of his interpretation of Romans 5:18.


(Translation copyright 2012 by Paul A. Rydecki.  All emphasis is in the original.)


Adnotationes ad priora capita Epistolae D. Pauli ad Romanos (1645)
Romans 5:18 (page 177)
Ἄρα οὖν ὡς διʼ ἑνὸς παραπτώματος εἰς πάντας ἀνθρώπους εἰς κατάκριμα, οὕτω καὶ διʼ ἑνὸς δικαιώματος εἰς πάντας ἀνθρώπους εἰς δικαίωσιν ζωῆς·

This verse is a summary of everything that came before.  That I may briefly summarize, he says, what I have said thus far concerning the comparison between Adam and Christ, the matter boils down to this: Just as the guilt that was contracted from one transgression of Adam sentences all men to death, so the righteousness of Christ that is imputed to believers by faith justifies them, so that they are restored again to participate in the eternal life that had been lost in Adam and through Adam.

ὡς διʼ ἑνὸς παραπτώματος εἰς πάντας ἀνθρώπους εἰς κατάκριμα. Just as through one offense (scil. guilt came) upon all men for condemnation. The Syrian version translated it: Just as through sin condemnation was to all the children of men.  The Apostle contrasts the transgression (τ παράπτωμα) of Adam and the righteousness (τδικαίωμα) of Christ.  Likewise, [he contrasts] the condemnation (κατάκριμα) that spread to all from Adam’s transgression and the justification of life (δικαίωσιν ζωῆςthat deduces its origin from the righteousness of Christ (ex Christi δικαιώματι)  and flows down to all.

οὕτω καὶ διʼ ἑνὸς δικαιώματος εἰς πάντας ἀνθρώπους εἰς δικαίωσιν ζωῆς. So through one Man’s righteousness (scil. the benefit overflowed) to all men for justification of life, that is, salvific justification.  For it is called “justification of life” because the end and consequence of it is life and eternal salvation.

[You ask,] But how did the righteousness of Christ overflow to all men for justification, since not all men are justified?  We reply: The Apostle is not speaking about the application of the benefit, but of the acquisition of the benefit.  If we wish to descend to the application, that universality must be restricted to those who are grafted into Christ by faith. For as the unrighteousness of Adam is communicated to all those who are descended from him by carnal generation, so the righteousness of Christ is communicated to all those who are grafted into Him through faith and spiritual regeneration.

---

Mr. Douglas Lindee said...
Thank you, Rev. Rydecki, for translating these. I hope you have more in the hopper! It is a pleasure to read from the towering figures of the past, who have very evidently mastered the art of language and the history of the Church, and can thus express the meaning of Scripture so succinctly. I think of the thousands of gallons of ink that have been recently spilled trying to explain this verse in terms of justification's universal application, and shake my head. In fact, so much must be written because of the long route necessary to explain it in a way that it clearly doesn't speak. All of that ink. Wasted. Instead, Gerhard writes very simply, dismissing the connection of this verse to itapplication and explains regarding it:

"The Apostle is not speaking about the application of the benefit, but of the acquisition of the benefit. If we wish to descend to the application, that universality must be restricted to those who are grafted into Christ by faith. For as the unrighteousness of Adam is communicated to all those who are descended from him by carnal generation, so the righteousness of Christ is communicated to all those who are grafted into Him through faith and spiritual regeneration."

Frankly, this is what I have always thought regarding the meaning of this verse -- it's only talking about theacquisition of justification (though I admit to having studied it only in the NASB and KJV, along with the help of various concordances and lexicons). Sure, it's going to say all men with regard to the acquisition of justification -- are some men going to acquire it in some other fashion?

But it's application is much different: All men are sinful insofar as they are connected to Adam ("the First Adam") in their nature; likewise, all men are righteous before God only insofar as they are connected to Christ ("the Second Adam") in their nature. I am only connected to Christ in this way through Faith and Regeneration. I think I tried to express this in my now infamous post, Fraternal Dialogue on the Topic of "Objective Justification", but did a comparatively poor job of it, next to Gerhard. In fact, there is no comparison. This was very helpful. Thanks again!

My Opinion,

Mr. Douglas Lindee

Paul McCain Promotes Apocrypha and Roman Catholic Website for Reformation.
Rejoices Over Justification by Faith Expulsion

I knew two Opus Dei managers and visited their mansion in St. Louis.
My supervisor went to Rome when the founder was recognized by the pope.
They are extremely weird and very much prized by the Church of Rome.


I could tell that Paul McCain's post on Ignatius Antiochus was copied, but from where? He actually admitted it on the full post:

http://cyberbrethren.com/2012/10/17/commemoration-ignatius-of-antioch/#more-3846

The following material is from the Catholic Encyclopedia, available online at New Advent.org.

McCain has been blogging for some time, but he manages not to embed links when they are so easy to do. The earlier link to LCMS material does not work - maybe not his fault. Servers have tantrums. McCain followed his typical pattern of cobbing the introduction from the LCMS server and the bulk from the Roman Catholic Church.

McCain has missed, once again, a chance to show the wording of the link and embed it at the same time. I wonder why he no longer promotes his "posts" on LutherQuest (sic). They still love, love, love his UOJ.

I will embed that as a demonstration.

The following material is from the Catholic Encyclopedia, available online at New Advent.org

That was easy, Paul. 

The reader can browse the original location and see what McCain is promoting--during this time when we recognize the Reformation and reiterate that the papacy is the very Antichrist.

Once again, readers can see the characteristics of Concordia Publishing House executives:
  1. McCain did not reveal his source clearly until now, after being forced by repeated postings here.
  2. Even then, McCain did not embed the link, which most bloggers do.
  3. The Missouri Synod is dedicated to promoting the Apocrypha and the papacy during Reformation celebrations.
Lecturer at a Roman Catholic school,
Jack Kilcrease defend Paul McCain's academic dishonesty and laziness.

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Jon Buchholz Lording It Over Others - The Iron Fist in the Iron Glove



Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "One Sane Voice on LutherQuest (sic)":

I like the Daniel Gorman (Heinrich) comment. He says in the last sentence:

>>>>>>......."The gospel does not permit DP to be lords over churches and to secretly remove their pastors from Christian fellowship." <<<<<<<

I ask:

"Since when did WELS or other church hierarchy ever allow the Gospel to interfere with their capricious, untoward and unloving actions?"

What happened to Pastor Rydecki is in keeping with 2 Timothy 3:1-5. Those who attempt [and do] please the Lord will be the ones hit upon by those who have no compunctions.

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org
www.moralmatters.org 

***

GJ - Several pastors told the previous Arizona-California DP to step down, and he did. Buchholz is even more heavy-handed than Jahnke was. The odd thing is - neither DP was heavy-handed about the Church and Changers.

Church and Change stars have never been disciplined.
They get the right hand of fellowship rather than the back-hand of the DP.

"Jesus is my rice" - a meditation by Jeff Gunn.

VirtueOnline - News - How Is WELS Different from the Episcopalians Who Shelter a Corrupt Bishop?

Bishop Bennison


PHILADELPHIA, PA: Bishop Charles Bennison Announces Retirement. Was he forced out?

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org 
October 10, 2012

The disgraced Bishop of Pennsylvania Charles E. Bennison told the diocese this week that he would retire from office at the end of the year. Bennison, 68, could have continued to serve until November 2015, when he turns 72, the church's mandatory retirement age for all clergy.

However, Bennison said in a letter to the diocese that the Rev. Ledlie I. Laughlin, president of the diocesan Standing Committee, told him that the committee wanted to elect a provisional bishop rather than either have Bennison call for the election of a coadjutor or have the diocese elect a diocesan who would be consecrated on the day of his retirement.


Church officials remain tightlipped, but sources have told VOL that he was told to resign or face disciplinary charges, a trial, and then be tossed out, based on a new canon passed at the church's recent General Convention. The 77th General Convention of The Episcopal Church passed an historic resolution in Indianapolis, B021, recognizing that when the relationship between bishops and dioceses is severely strained, sometimes to the breaking point, there is a way out that includes getting rid of the diocesan bishop. Behind the scenes public pressure was put on him to make a public statement.

The Standing Committee of the Diocese of Pennsylvania apparently used the new canon to finally get rid of Bennison without using any of the Title IV disciplinary canons.

"I believe that the interests of the diocese are best served if the process envisioned by the Standing Committee begins sooner rather than later and therefore I have informed the committee that I will retire on December 31, 2012." The Pennsylvania Standing Committee has been at odds with Bennison since the mid-2000s over concerns about how he has managed the diocese's assets and other issues.

Laughlin, who is the rector at St. Peter's Church in Philadelphia, wrote in a second letter to the diocese that the Standing Committee had decided in consultation with Bishop Clayton Matthews, head of the Episcopal Church's Office of Pastoral Development, that "the best interests of our diocese will be served by the prompt election of a provisional bishop." A provisional bishop exercises the full authority of a diocesan bishop, but is elected to serve for a set period of time, generally as an interim between bishops, Laughlin explained in his letter." Laughlin predicts that a special electing convention would be held in early 2013.

Bennison will go down as possibly the worst bishop since Arius. He once said that Jesus was a sinner who forgave himself. He was found guilty of covering up his brother's (a priest) abuse of a minor, but got off on a statute of limitations. He lied and deceived a small group of Anglo-Catholic priests over a flying bishop arrangement they had with a previous Episcopal bishop. He made life miserable for Evangelical priests in the diocese and got embroiled in multiple lawsuits with David Moyer, former priest at the Church of the Good Shepherd in Rosemont, PA. He managed to retain properties in disputes with those who chose to leave over the Episcopal Church's acceptance of pansexuality, but then admitted it cost $55,000 a year to maintain empty buildings - a cost of nearly half a million dollars a year to the diocese.

He upset the former Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold over l'affair Moyer who told Bennison to resolve the issues between them and asked him to meet him on a plain beyond good and evil, citing Rumi the Sufi.

Bennison spent millions on a cathedral that draws less than 30 aging Episcopalians weekly. A building development project may keep the cathedral from closing down. He also spent thousands on a book he hoped would vindicate his time in office.

During Bennison's tenure, the Standing Committee called for his resignation more than once, including on the day he returned to work in August 2010 after the church's Court of Review for the Trial of a Bishop overturned a lower church court's finding that he should be removed from ordained ministry because he had engaged in conduct unbecoming a member of the clergy. The review court agreed with one of the lower court's two findings of misconduct, but it said that Bennison could not be deposed because the charge was barred by the church's statute of limitations.

The review court said that Bennison failed to respond properly in the mid-1970s when he was rector of St. Mark's Episcopal Church in Upland, California, and learned that his brother, John, who worked initially as a lay youth minister in the parish, had been having a sexual relationship with a member of the youth group that began when she was 14. John Bennison later was ordained a priest but deposed in 1977 for an unrelated offense. He was restored to the priesthood in 1980, but he was forced to renounce his orders again in 2006 when accusations of his abuse became public.

Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori inhibited Charles Bennison in October 2007 from exercising his ordained ministry when the church's Title IV Review Committee formally accused him of the inaction. The inhibition expired with the review court's decision.

In September 2010, the diocesan Standing Committee asked the House of Bishops for its "support and assistance" in securing Bennison's retirement or resignation. The bishops later that month called for Bennison's "immediate and unconditional resignation." The next day, Bennison refused to resign and has remained the diocesan bishop. At one point, the Bishop of Bethlehem Paul Marshall urged Bennison to step down. He refused.

The Pennsylvania diocese will meet on Nov. 10 for its 229th annual convention. Laughlin said in his letter that the standing committee was making plans to honor Bennison's tenure at the convention.

Question: what is there to honor?

'via Blog this'