Tuesday, November 6, 2012

WELS NNIV Diaprax:
Bible translation study released | Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS)

WELS Forward in Christ.


Bible translation study released | Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS):


The Translation Evaluation Committee (TEC) has released the unedited, unevaluated results of a side-by-side review of three possible Bible translations WELS could use for its publications. More than 100 pastors participated in this review of the New International Version 2011 (NIV 2011), the English Standard Version (ESV), and the Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB) from April to October.
“We will be coming with our read on it, but what we first wanted to do was get it out there—raw and uncooked—so that everyone would have a chance to let the evaluation speak for itself,” says Rev. Paul Wendland, TEC chairman.
The TEC, which had already compared differing passages between the NIV 1984 and the NIV 2011 and presented its preliminary findings at the 2011 convention, organized this study in an effort to examine the strengths and weaknesses of each translation as well as to involve more people in the process.
For the study, the Bible was divided into 34 different sections, and three different pastors reviewed each section from each translation. These reviewers came from three distinct groups: synod leaders, pastors from each district who attended a 2012 translation workshop, and pastors who have been in the ministry for less than 12 years. Reviewers read and evaluated their section and rated the quality of the English style as well as the translational acceptability of each translation. They also were asked to list their section’s five greatest strengths and weaknesses by citing specific passages for each translation.
“Everyone knew that we were asking a lot and yet look at what they did . . . there’s enough for 20 term papers,” says Wendland. “They all gave themselves to it—whatever their perspective—to the fullest degree. And they all did a lot of really hard work in trying to help the synod come to a decision.”
Participants appreciated the opportunity to be involved. “I have grown personally, professionally, and certainly spiritually by this exercise,” writes one of the younger pastors. “And so, for this opportunity to compare the translations and get into the Greek outside of sermon preparation, I sincerely thank you.”
The next step for the TEC is to evaluate the review and prepare its final report for the 2013 synod convention, which will be discussing which translation WELS should use in its publications. “I think this data will be extremely helpful as we think through the various options that are open for us,” says Wendland. “And as we go forward, no matter what version we use, these studies will be extremely helpful in equipping pastors and laypeople about problem passages.”
Wendland says that it’s not surprising that this new translation is causing some debate in Christian churches in general. “Not all people are going to agree,” he says. “I think in our midst what it probably indicates more than anything else is the love that God’s people have for the Word and their desire to have a text of the Bible that clearly communicates God’s sacred truth.”
He also says the committee is open to any reaction about this study. “I would simply encourage everyone to study the results, to listen—especially to brothers and sisters who may not see things exactly the same way you do—and to give them your love and respect if not your acquiescence. Finally trust that the Word of God is going to be retained among us because of his promise that the grass withers and that the flowers may fall, but the Word of God is going to remain forever [Isaiah 40:8], not because of our doing and striving.”
Read the results of the study at www.wels.net/translation.


'via Blog this'

***



GJ - All propaganda to advance a bad cause sounds alike. This article reminds me of the publication from the ALC and LCA in their magazines, to prepare the ALC for getting rid of Biblical inerrancy.

The ALC had an interesting position on this. The old ALC merger of 1930 (Buffalo, Iowa, Ohio) watered down inerrancy to satisfy Reu and the Iowa fence-straddlers. Lenski objected, so they silenced him, even though he had been their New Testament professor and a district president.

Reu later became more conservative, a transition never forgiven by the Iowa liberals or anyone else in the ALC-LCA constellation.

For the 1960 merger of the old ALC and Norwegian Synod, inerrancy was affirmed in the constitution but expelled in an appendix, to please both sides. Error loves ambiguities. The raging liberals could be told, "We got rid of that." The inerrancy people could be soothed with, "We affirmed inerrancy."

All the Lutheran groups were waging war against the historical position of the Christian Church, Biblical inerrancy, from 1930 on.

Therefore, when The ALC and the LCA were preparing to merge with the Seminex UOJ gay faction, they began publishing more anti-inerrancy material to exorcise that demon from their doctrinal position.



The Lutheran magazine (LCA) and The Lutheran Standard (ALC) ran the same article. The ALC version showed a motorcycle doing a wheelie. The title was something like, "The Word of God: Pure Power." The LCA title was considerably weaker, but the content was the same in both.

The gushing and emoting in the WELS article would make a romance novel writer blush. It is so icky-mushy-fake that Lutherans might pause and remember the look of rage on Wendland's face as person after person--even a DP--rose to attack his precious New NIV.


---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "WELS NNIV Diaprax: Bible translation study release...":

92% of reviewers rated the NIV2011 the best of the three translations. [GJ - Limited choice.]

Comments by those who reviewed the translations:

1)”One cannot properly evaluate the translation of any given book (in my case, Genesis) when that book must be viewed in isolation from the rest of Scripture. Being directed to do so severely limits and skews any evaluation given…. Weren’t we correctly taught that one of the “bedrock” principles of Bible interpretation is that “Scripture must interpret Scripture”? How, then, can we properly study (or evaluate) Bible passages or books of the Bible in isolation?”

2)”While reviewing Genesis was my “sole responsibility” (and while I am grateful for the opportunity to participate in this effort) the TEC is unnecessarily (and I believe unwisely) depriving itself of the insights and concerns I and others feel compelled to express regarding various “deal breakers” in other books.”

3) “Limiting the reviewer to only the five “best” and five “weakest” passages per translation can and most likely will skew the review. Someone could incorrectly conclude that the reviewer has a “balanced” (good vs bad) view that, in fact, does not exist regarding a particular translation…. A thorough-going, honest review should be able to take the total weight of strengths and weaknesses into account, and the reviewer should be allowed to express the full results of his work. Yet we are directed not to do so. Again, I ask, “Why?””

4) “A significant “deal breaker” criterion for me is the “Decision page” that is found in every HCSB I have…. Unfortunately, NO REVIEWER of any of the Bible’s 66 books is allowed to comment on that significant deficiency in light of the restrictive evaluation criteria we have been given.”
http://www.wels.net/sites/wels/files/Reviewers%20Comments%20Translation%20Criteria.pdf

All 2012 Translation Evaluation reports: 
http://www.wels.net/about-wels/synod-reports/bible-translation/report-102/2012-translation-evaluation-report-102

The Adiaphora Argument Used Is Invalid - Another Twisting of the Book of Concord

This seems to be good reason NOT to copy Groeschel
and the Catholic Encyclopedia,
but it also explains why Glende and No Call Paul McCain are FB friends.


Book of Concord, Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration, X, Adiaphora

5] Namely, when under the title and pretext of external adiaphora such things are proposed as are in principle contrary to God's Word (although painted another color), these are not to be regarded as adiaphora, in which one is free to act as he will, but must be avoided as things prohibited by God. In like manner, too, such ceremonies should not be reckoned among the genuine free adiaphora, or matters of indifference, as make a show or feign the appearance, as though our religion and that of the Papists were not far apart, thus to avoid persecution, or as though the latter were not at least highly offensive to us; or when such ceremonies are designed for the purpose, and required and received in this sense, as though by and through them both contrary religions were reconciled and became one body; or when a reentering into the Papacy and a departure from the pure doctrine of the Gospel and true religion should occur or gradually follow therefrom [when there is danger lest we seem to have reentered the Papacy, and to have departed, or to be on the point of departing gradually, from the pure doctrine of the Gospel].


10] We believe, teach, and confess also that at the time of confession [when a confession of the heavenly truth is required], when the enemies of God's Word desire to suppress the pure doctrine of the holy Gospel, the entire congregation of God, yea, every Christian, but especially the ministers of the Word, as the leaders of the congregation of God [as those whom God has appointed to rule His Church], are bound by God's Word to confess freely and openly the [godly] doctrine, and what belongs to the whole of [pure] religion, not only in words, but also in works and with deeds; and that then, in this case, even in such [things truly and of themselves] adiaphora, they must not yield to the adversaries, or permit these [adiaphora] to be forced upon them by their enemies, whether by violence or cunning, to the detriment of the true worship of God and the introduction and sanction of idolatry. 11] For it is written, Gal. 5:1: Stand fast, therefore, in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not again entangled in the yoke of bondage. Also Gal. 2:4f : And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage; to whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour, that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you.

***

GJ - The article on Adiaphora (matters of indifference) is used to advance false doctrine in the SynCon sects. Kudu Don Patterson's wealthy layman said, "Almost everything in worship is adiaphora."

Missouri has plenty of Fuller Seminary emergents, but also a boatload of papal-wannabees. 

In all these cases, the article on adiaphora is a staggering blow against their craft and assaults, their deceit and trickery. This is a time of confession, because the Church of Rome is using all its power, wealth, and pageantry to weasel Protestants into the fold. Note the constant promotion of Roman terms among the Lutherans today, the persistent references to the great and wise papalists (like the pope), the obsession with Roman customs, liturgical colors, and lectionary readings (three-year, another gift from Rome).

Missouri, WELS, the Little Sect, and the toxic CLC (sic) have all done things to express unity with Rome.WELS-ELS had a bishop march in procession at a religious service at Bethany (aka The Little Schoolhouse on the Prairie) and an archbishop pedophile teach at Wisconsin Lutheran College. Weakland's priests also taught in that series of lectures. How many were in his harem, no one will ever tell. They have all joined with ELCA (!) to use the Roman three-year lectionary and the gay Roman  liturgical colors. 

Need I mention the aping of everything from Fuller Seminary? Fuller doctrine and methods are the best way to get promoted in WELS, Missouri, the ELS, and the toxic CLC (sic). Those yearning to be president of The Sausage Factory better sign up for some Fuller courses, because that is the ticket. Ask Valleskey and Wendland.

Where has ELS Jay Webber, the Torquemada of Ternopil, been during this onslaught of Romanism and Fullerism? He battles constantly against justification by faith, but seems indifferent to the last days of an insane, old world. Has the ELS Bored of Doctrine even noticed the dominance of Fuller thinking in ELS/WELS? the Weakland and Martin Marty lectures? Mark and Avoid Jeske? 

The innocent should consider how these noble Pharisees wrinkle their noses in disgust, if anything amiss is mentioned to them. WELS - You studied at Ft. Wayne? How tragic. 

  • ELS - You were WELS? I hope you recover.
  • Missouri St. Louis - You only went to Ft. Wayne?
  • Missouri Ft. Wayne - You are a St. Louis snob?
  • CLC (sic) - You were not there when we began. Apostate!



This church building is held together by strands of giant steel dental floss,
but Missouri spends its money on imperial salaries for seminary profs and CPH plagiarists.
---
From Brett Meyer:


In line with your post on Adiaphora I’m sending you part of the exchange with Holy Trinity that highlights their leaving adiaphora behind in favor of a new tactic.  (W)ELS has moved far beyond issues of adiaphora and on to Rome’s version of Principles and Application of Principles.  May be too long for posting but your call.

From: brett.meyer@comcast.net [mailto:brett.meyer@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 3:22 PM
To: Pastor Schewe
Cc: brett.meyer@comcast.net
Subject: July 9th service
Importance: High

Pastor, during the third reading today you had a responsive reading of Matthew 6:19-21,25- 34. Can you please explain why you had the women reading two parts of the Scripture? Doesn't biblical doctrine teach that women should be silent in the church, 1 Corinthians 14:34,35. This is clearly prohibited by our Orthodox Lutheran doctrine and should not have been done.

1 Corinthians 14:34-35, “Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.”


From: Pastor Schewe
To: brett.meyer@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:46 PM
Subject: RE: July 9th service

Hi back Brett,
I thought I’d get back to you on your question. Our company from Wisconsin kept us pretty busy the last couple days! Thanks for the question. I’m a bit surprised that you asked this one because antiphonal formats have been used for quite a while in our circles, and have been deemed an acceptable practice that does not violate the man/woman roles God has established. I know that Holy Trinity has used antiphonal formats in the past before I arrived. Also, we sang an antiphonal hymn on Easter Sunday.

As far as the verses from 1 Cor. 14, where it states that women should “remain silent in the churches,” I’m going to assume that you already know that this does not prohibit women from uttering noises in church. Otherwise, women couldn’t pray, confess their faith, sing about the Law and the Gospel, or do any other activities that involved their voice. So then, what does it mean that they are to “remain silent?”

The previous verses give the context for this. Paul writes that there has been disorderly prophesying in the church at Corinth. People intending to teach the group were speaking all at once, causing confusion. Paul therefore gives this command in 1 Cor. 14, which is similar to 1 Timothy 2: “I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.” Therefore, it would be a violation for a woman to do things such as hold pastoral office over a congregation, to lead Adult Bible Study over men, or to exercise voting rights. It would not be a valid application of this teaching principle to apply it to every use of women’s voices in worship or to antiphonal formats of worship. If we were going to do that, we would have to eliminate women soloists, female choirs, prominent women’s melodies in mixed choirs, women and men singing the psalms antiphonally, etc. (Our teaching training college, Martin Luther College in New Ulm, MN, has a very fine “Treble Choir” that sings God’s law and gospel to God’s people) In fact, the music pieces and hymns would be even more suspect than reading Scripture, since they contain interpretation of Scripture. We’d even have to condemn women singing in the presence of men, because the men might hear them. These activities, however, are viewed in our circles as acceptable practices that do not usurp teaching authority and thereby violate the Scriptural principle.

Hope you’re having a good week! May God keep our families under his protecting hand,
Pastor S.

From: brett.meyer@comcast.net [mailto:brett.meyer@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 10:20 PM
To: Pastor Schewe
Subject: Re: July 9th service

Pastor, thank you for your response. You are correct, the same thing has happened at HTLC before. Only once while we were visiting. Pastor Buchholz was asking doctrinal questions of men and women during the sermon and in turn they would stand and give an answer to the entire congregation. My family and I immediately left the service just as we did this past Sunday.

The fact that Synod has accepted this practice and states that it doesn't violate scripture means nothing to me if they can't back it up with scripture. And they haven't provided any scriptural support for it other than to erode existing passages (refer to the WELS question and answer below from the Synod website). I also think this is indicative of the condition of our ELS and WELS Synods.

When women recite the creeds, sing hymns, pray the Lord's prayer they are doing so with the entire congregation and are speaking to and being served by God individually. They are not instructing the entire congregation during those activities. When scripture passages are being read to the congregation then that is an act of teaching the congregation God's words, God's doctrines. They are speaking with God's authority, Holy Scripture, to the church. This is clearly prohibited in 1 Cor. 14:34,35 and 1 Tim. 2:11,12.

It is quite possible that this issue, and others, derive from our first contention which is what is happening during the service. You've contended that primarily we are serving God during the Worship Service and I contend that primarily if not solely God is serving us during the Divine Service. Now if we are primarily serving God, then how we worship and what we worship with becomes adiaphora and subject to personal opinion and tastes. The hymns we sing no longer contain scripture but focus on praise words and songs which magnify how we feel and what we do. This trend toward focusing on us can be seen the change of names from the Divine Service to the Worship service as Divine refers to God and Worship refers to us and what we do. But if God is serving us then we no longer have such wide choices and the liturgy is no longer adiaphora because God has chosen to serve us through only two means, Word and Sacrament. Thus the entire service revolves around God's Word and his Sacraments serving us. Convicting us of our sins and creating contrition in our hearts through the Law, strengthening our faith in Christ's perfect work and granting us the forgiveness of sins through the Lord's Supper and declaring us righteous before God the Father by grace through faith in the Gospel.

Also, doctrine needs to be decided solely on scripture and not on practices or traditions that would have to change because of the decision. For the Catholic Church dictates doctrine based on tradition and they remain damned to this day. There is nothing good in the Church Growth movement. Practice affects doctrine.
In Christ,
Brett

Q: I was reading on a past WELS q&a that it may be possible for women to be lectors during a worship service (especially if the tone and inflection of her voice is proper). I have several questions regarding this viewpoint. 1. This has not been the viewpoint of some WELS theologians as is clear from articles written in WLQ from the 60's and 70's. Has the WELS changed its interpretation of the 1 Corinthians passages dealing with women remaining silent? 2. Does the WELS now teach that it may be acceptable in some instances for a woman to read a Pastor's pre-prepared sermon in front of the congregation since she technically would not be teaching of having authority? 3. Are we witnessing the slippery slope or frog boiling phenomena in the WELS with regard to its stance on women's roles? I ask these questions only because I care deeply for the WELS and the solid doctrinal stance it has held by the grace of God!

A: An article in the 1981 Wisconsin Lutheran Quarterly (an exegesis of 1 Co 14:33b ff.) points out that the matter of women being silent in the church is not the principle but an application of the principle to the unique type of worship service that existed in Corinth. The principle is that a woman is not to assume authority over a man. This principle is not being denied by saying that a woman could serve as a lector. The reading of a Scripture passage with men present is not in and of itself assuming authority over the men. However, reading from the front of the church with a posture and tone of voice that would signal a woman's attitude of lording it over others would be a violation of this principle.

So though it may be technically possible for a woman to read the Scriptures in a worship service without violating her God-given role, there are a number of other factors that need to be carefully considered before this is done. The question that brought this matter up asked whether in and of itself reading the Scripture lessons in church would be a sin for a woman. But since it is not usually an "in and of itself" matter, it would be a practice that involves a number of other important issues that need to be addressed before it is done.

Monday, November 5, 2012

Remember the GM Volt!



rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Southern Baptist Loyalties and WELS Follies":

After working most of my adult life for General Motors, the similarities between it and the Olde Synodical Conference are scary. I often wondered how long GM could carry so much dead weight from the middle to the top of its management. I lived long enough to get an answer. I was also puzzled as to why anyone would want to move from the shop floor into supervision. At the bottom of management, independent thinking was always squelched. The Olde Synodical Conference was once the largest Lutheran body in this country. GM was once the largest auto maker. Both have collapsed from their own weight.

***

GJ - We have a cousin who retired very young from GM in Canada. It was said that the LCA was formed in the 1960s with GM as its model. Every few years a lot more committees, commissions, and staffers were eliminated. That goes on with the ELCA, which merged having a women's commission and national women's group, both committed to the same feminist ideals.

The structure was great for achieving radical goals, leveraged by quotas.


Abraham, the Patriarch, the Father of Faith - Creates the Ultimate Problem for UOJ



arkos has left a new comment on your post "A.D. Asks - Can We Only Believe in What Is Already...":

"I cannot believe in something unless it has already happened."

So they must believe in the preexistence of souls?

4 Then the word of the Lord came to him: “This man will not be your heir, but a son coming from your own body will be your heir.” 5 He took him outside and said, “Look up at the heavens and count the stars—if indeed you can count them.” Then he said to him, “So shall your offspring be.”

6 Abram believed the Lord, and he credited it to him as righteousness.

Isaac and the multitude of Abraham's descendents must have already been in existence, otherwise there is no way Abraham could have believed the promise.

***

GJ - But also, Christ have already died for the sins of the world, or the Promise would not have been valid.

However, the UOJ numbskulls are not bothered by the content of the actual text. They voted for UOJ in 1932 in the Brief Statement, where Romans 4:25 was cited as proof of the imaginary Easter absolution (taught by Pietists Rambach, not by the orthodox Chemnitz). All of Romans 4 is dedicated to the theme of justification by faith, climaxing with the great summary statement of Romans 5:1-2, which allows no room for UOJ.


Only one pastor has been suspended during the reign of Pope Mark Schroeder. And the reason for the suspension? - teaching justification by faith.

  • Worshiping with Babtist gay activist Andy Stanley? No problem.
  • Copying the sermons of Methodist Craig Groeschel? No problem.
  • Storing man/boy rape files at the WELS headquarters? No problem.
  • A woman administering the Means of Grace? No problem.
  • Working with ELCA, who pays for abortion? No problem.
  • Promoting Thrivent, the all-religion insurance racket? No problem.
  • Opposing Luther's doctrine of justification? No problem.
  • Rejecting the Confessions? No problem.


Southern Baptist Loyalties and WELS Follies

St. John in Milwaukee was kicked out, because of a DP's spite.

A Southern Baptist missionary was defending his denomination when I broached the subject of apostasy. I knew about their battle for the Bible, years ago, but I was not in position to talk about their
leadership.

Most of us know they had a convention resolution to reject the New NIV, which included NOT displaying it in their bookstores. Often new paraphrase is sold as a curiosity before everyone finds it tiresome and silly. That was the first time I heard of an effort getting the leprosy label from the start.

It's over.

No wonder WELS loves it. Three out of three hand-picked study groups gave their slobbering approval. SP Mark Schroeder is helpless to do anything about it. Spinmeisters grieve over his heavy burden of office.

That may be the crucial difference - and the reason why the hierarchies will fail completely in the next generation.

The Boomers were channeled into ultra-organized structures. In Moline we had clubs with four officers, church groups with four officers, state and national groups with four officers. The yearbook shows our 1966 class activities at a very large high school - 3,000 Boomers. A glance showed who the most active were, who got scholarships for that, and who would turn hippy soon after.

No one could question the purchase or the money spent there.
Now it is a prison. I don't write satire - I just record it.
Hierarchy literally means "the rule of the priests." Any organization with a top-heavy structure will generate leaders who must constantly prove their power and infallibility. WELS, Missouri, ELCA, and the Little Sect on the Prairie are all the same. Long ago, I got an email from the CLC (sic) that said I was "showing contempt for synodical resolutions." Showing contempt? - I was doing my best to hide it.

Herman Otten had to apologize on the front page of his independent tabloid, because WELS was offended about my honest discussion of their homosexual problems. Soon after, Joel Hochmuth was arrested and The Love Shack was investigated by the FBI for those problems. Grotesque evil has a way of revealing itself, even when the hierarchy is hell-bent on covering it up.

I have been watching a very large business for three years, attending all but one of their monthly meetings. One thing they emphasize is managers listening to workers and to shoppers. The bigshots visit stores all over the world. They also feel compelled to listen to customers and to their subordinates.

That listening has been key to their turn-around. They are definitely a hierarchy too, but a hierarchy that is held accountable for return on investment. Church hierarchies do not listen to anyone - they command. They demand apologies and retractions. They only want agreement or hat-in-hand trembling subordination of the brain cells.

A church hierarchy looks for subordinates who gladly obey whatever the boss commands. WELS tries out people by putting them on various boards and executive committees. If the initiates agree to having their spines removed, they continue to serve and eventually become senior bosses. Any display of independent thinking is met with, "You are not a team player" and "Who told you?" It is far more pleasant to whack moles than to be mole whacked.



---

rlschultz said...

After working most of my adult life for General Motors, the similarities between it and the Olde Synodical Conference are scary. I often wondered how long GM could carry so much dead weight from the middle to the top of its management. I lived long enough to get an answer. I was also puzzled as to why anyone would want to move from the shop floor into supervision. At the bottom of management, independent thinking was always squelched. The Olde Syndocial Conference was once the largest Lutheran body in this country. GM was once the largest auto maker. Both have collapsed from their own weight.

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Southern Baptist Loyalties and WELS Follies":

Ichabod -

You perfectly described synodical church hierarchy. You stated:

>>>>>> ...... Church hierarchies do not listen to anyone - they command. They demand apologies and retractions. They only want agreement or hat-in-hand trembling subordination of the brain cells.

A church hierarchy looks for subordinates who gladly obey whatever the boss commands. WELS tries out people by putting them on various boards and executive committees. If the initiates agree to having their spines removed, they continue to serve and eventually become senior bosses. Any display of independent thinking is met with, "You are not a team player" and "Who told you?" It is far more pleasant to whack moles than to be mole whacked....... <<<<<<<<<< [Your words]

Such is the sorry case of those who think they are at "the top." They have since abandoned the principle of Christ that whoever would be first, must be servant of all. Dictatorial cruelty toward parish pastors and their perspective congregations is nothing more than wanton carnal behavior. As sanctimonious as it is always made to be; it is nothing more than busybody bully behavior; thus, under the Lord's curses.

Various denominational and synodical head cheese church people are a stench in the Lord's nostrils. They think they are doing God a service; when, in reality they hinder the Holy Spirit's purposes. They will be judge with severity; so much so, that if some of them should attain to glory; they will squeak in by the skin of their teeth. Shame on these of whom the Scripture speaks:

Psalm 14:4 - "Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge? who eat up my people as they eat bread, and call not upon the LORD."

Jeremiah 23:1 - "Woe be unto the pastors that destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture! saith the LORD."

Jeremiah 23:2 - Therefore thus saith the LORD God of Israel against the pastors that feed my people; Ye have scattered my flock, and driven them away, and have not visited them: behold, I will visit upon you the evil of your doings, saith the LORD."

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org

www.moralmatters.org

WELS Mission Board News - The Kind That Never Reaches the Propaganda Outlets



bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Report to WELS - Two Headquarters. Two Felony Arre...":

Sources tell me that an announcement was made in the WELS Synodical Council meeting on Saturday, Nov 3rd, that the synod received a letter of intent from someone to buy the N. Mayfair Rd. synodical office complex for $1.8 million. They were very excited, but noted that it wasn't a contract yet.


***

A real estate firm could not wait to sell their white elephant
to WELS.


GJ - Excited means they can move into their Pewaukee high-rise, since the financial whiz-kids of the Schroeder administration managed to become owners of two synodical headquarters buildings at once - in a down commercial real estate market.

WELS is a buyer of last resort.
If no one wants a commercial property, WELS will buy it at a premium price.


In other WELS news -

The Church Extension Fund gives out its own grants, designation by the Home Missions and District boards (which are totally controlled by Jeske's Church and Changers).

Moncks Corner in North Carolina got a $1 million grant because Boeing is moving a plant there.

Trapp's Madison student chapel spends $4,000 a year, giving away free coffee to attract students to the study lounge on the main floor. The chapel is above the lounge, so students are not scared away by religious trappings. Trapp has always been a Willow Creek loyalist and once had his congregation a member of the Willow Creek Association (as Parlow did).

In fact, the mission board sent pastors to Willow Creek and paid their way, so being a WC member was more of an asset in getting free loot from WELS for building and remodeling.



The CORE got its grant money from WELS because Church and Change controls the synod leaders. Golly - they ARE the synod leadership. The CORE will probably back very little of all the money received from WELS. My source did not say so, but I suspect the CORE donor laundered a gift through the Church Extension Fund to make it look more legitimate. If infallible WELS makes a decision, that decision cannot be questioned.

As one pea-brained WELS pastor told a family, "You have questioned the proposed hymnal. You have broken fellowship with WELS. You are no longer a member." That family was happy to leave and the pastor is still in WELS. He fits right in!

Free coffee, a crooning sax, WELS propaganda, CCM, Elton Stroy's expertise -
How could the Latte Church flop?
"When all else fails, try religion."


Sunday, November 4, 2012

The Christian voting bloc will decide the US 2012 presidential election « moralmatters.org



The Christian voting bloc will decide the US 2012 presidential election « moralmatters.org:


The Christian voting bloc will decide the US 2012 presidential election


A disciple of Christ cannot in good conscience, vote for Obama. It would be like placing a fox in a hen house. Obama’s Muslim / Islamic bent is destructive to Christianity and to our American freedoms.
Professed Christians will be the determining factor in this presidential election 
The largest voting block this presidential election (as with all elections) is the Christian vote. It is said that in the recent 2008 election, the evangelical Christian voting bloc comprised 30% Ohio’s total voting base; 31% in Iowa; and 28% in Wisconsin. That’s not even counting the huge Catholic Christian voting block in these perspective “battleground states” and across the nation.  Hence, it could be easily said and concluded, that at least 50% of all possible voters, make up the Christian voting bloc.
It is reported that Obama won Ohio by only 260,000 votes last 2008 election while approximately 350,000 evangelical voters did not vote. And, we know that close to 55% (nationwide) of all Catholic voters voted for Obama, thus helping him achieve an election victory. [I wonder how many of those Catholic Obama voters regretted their decision, since Obama's healthcare bill was implemented and now discriminates against these people of faith].
Professed Christians have no excuse to stay home election day; they also denigrate their religion if they vote for Barack Obama
There is no viable or rational excuse for Christians to stay home election day. Choosing not to vote is purely irresponsible and unpatriotic; especially when one candidate has proven by his agenda and policies that his worldview is anti-Christian and anti-Biblical. He has lied about his religious persuasion so as to snake charm the Christian voting bloc. Last election he was successful in snookering undiscerning Christians. This time around, Obama has an awful political record. Christians who vote for this serial liar are simply shooting, not only themselves in the feet, but voting against traditional and patriotic America. Voting for Obama is voting to continue Obama’s socialist agenda which is anti-American; anti-Capitalism; anti-Free Enterprise and anti-traditional good morals. All one has to do is look at his political record and judge on the basis of his actions and record, discarding all the cheap and worthless Obama promises.
Granted Obama’s challenger is a Mormon. And, many Christians do not consider Mormonism to be within the pale of Christianity [this author is one of them]. But, American presidential elections aren’t the same as Christians being asked to vote for a parish pastor candidate.American elections are a secular and patriotic exercise.  The Triune God has blessed this nation as none other. Through the founding and framing fathers the good Lord gave this country a Constitutional Republic with Constitutional and Bill of Rights guarantees, to protect the free exercise of religion and speech. Christians refusing to vote, allow (by their “sin of omission”) the godless to promulgate the destruction of traditional, patriotic and free America.

Mitt Romney best represents traditional and patriotic America. His opponent has sadly and pathetically proven otherwise.
Mitt Romney best understands what America is all about. He understands America’s free enterprise. His father was an auto executive and Michigan’s former governor. Mitt Romney best understands that America works greatest, when its free enterprise can be unleashed and unhindered.  Barack Obama, on the other hand, has proven that his restrictive socialist policies are killing America’s economic and social potential. A nation so economically out of whack, cannot endure; but, only finally, topple. Also, Obama in essence, is of Muslim extract. His devotion to Islam is at direct odds with Western civilization and Christianity. Voting for Obama is like deliberately placing a fox in a hen house.
In short, America’s Christian voting bloc needs to vote for the candidate who best expresses its professed Biblical values. Mitt Romney, although not perfect; best mirrors not only good morals and Biblical principles; but traditional American free enterprise, which is, part and parcel, the foundational economic building block for this God blest, free society.
Related:
Please note the following two informational links, of which contain many other informational links:
Excerpt:
>>>>>>> …… The founders chose the lesser of two evils – because it led to the greater good. For them, the greater evil, worse than allowing slavery – which they realized would come to an end before too many decades – would have been to allow the disintegration of the United States of America to continue, to permit history’s greatest birth of liberty to be smothered in the cradle.
Therefore, to all those who today proclaim so high-mindedly that they cannot dishonor God by choosing “the lesser of two evils,” I would say this:
Our wise forefathers, seeing our nation disintegrate before their eyes, did what they did in Philadelphia because it was the only way forward – otherwise they would lose their country. Today, our nation is likewise disintegrating. Whether you like Mitt Romney or not is irrelevant, just as the founders’ attitude toward slavery didn’t deter them from doing what they had to do to save the nation. Electing Romney is simply the only possible way to stop Obama from continuing on as president. Everything else is folly.
So if, rather than casting your ballot for Romney/Ryan, you vote for a third-party presidential candidate like the Libertarian Party’s Gary Johnson or the Constitution Party’s Virgil Goode, or write in some name like “Jesus” or “God” or “Ron Paul” (I cite these examples since some people are claiming this is how they will cast their vote for president), or if you refuse to vote, you are knowingly contributing to the continued reign of Barack Obama, the most catastrophic president in history, whose actions of late have bordered on treason and who has almost destroyed America in four years and will complete the job in four more.
As I said at the outset, this is a very close election. Every vote counts. Your vote counts. A few ballots in a few key states next week may well determine the destiny of America for all time.
God forbid that good people, believing they are honoring God, upholding higher principle and refraining from supporting evil, would be deceived through their own anger and pride into doing the opposite and betraying all that they love……. <<<<<<<<< - wnd.com/2012/10/
_______________________________________
Posted by:  Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel
Please note for future voting consideration reference:


'via Blog this'

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "The Christian voting bloc will decide the US 2012 ...":

The problem with voting for the lesser of two evils is that you are personally responsible for the evil that the lesser commits should the person win.

It also feeds into the continued spiral of the United States into abject socialism. Little comfort for our children and grandchildren who will suffer under the brutal tirrany of "less" evil men.

Far better to vote for an individual who has promoted individual liberty as established by the United States Constitution.

The current race is simply to decide who gets to let the American people know that they've been living in the New World Order for years - as envisioned and enacted by the Bush, Clinton and Obama presidencies.

Most people simply refuse to study and take an honest look at what has been prepared. Many similarities to the Lutheran Synods where the supposed orthodox conservatives are just as complicit as the Homosexual and abusive emergent sects in the rise of the New World Religion: the religion of the Antichrist.

***

GJ - The problem with staying at home or voting for a third party candidate is Obama. Many people stayed home or voted for a third party. I voted for McCain in 2008 with a clothespin on my nose. He was loathed as a Senator in Arizona and had no support in his own state.

The Evangelicals who stayed at home elected Obama by default.

However, the big issue is not one election but the willingness of citizens to learn more and do more, not accepting the rule of the country club Republicans. I hope that happens but I doubt it will.

---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "The Christian voting bloc will decide the US 2012 ...":

I thought about this hypothetical question, who would I vote for if I were a US citizen?

I probably go for Romney and yes I know he is a Mormon, but Obama's liberal Christlam pseudo religion is no better.

I found this piece weird...
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/11/03/cnn-religion-blogger-attacks-christian-conservatives-for-supporting-romney/



Both of them are not Christian in the pure sense of the word, doctrinally and in practice.

***

GJ - There are no religious requirements for federal office holders.

Obama is a Muslim - by dress, by practice, by confession, and by parentage (putative father and adoptive father - both Muslims).

I wonder how many readers know about the Mormon legend that one of their own will ride to the rescue of America.

I have been profoundly disappointed in synod presidents and US presidents. My opinion is that less insanity will be good for America, but nothing will help if the citizens remain passive and submissive.

---


Brett Meyer said...
The problem with voting for the lesser of two evils is that you are personally responsible for the evil that the lesser commits should the person win. 

It also feeds into the continued spiral of the United States into abject socialism. Little comfort for our children and grandchildren who will suffer under the brutal tyranny of "less" evil men.

Far better to vote for an individual who has promoted individual liberty as established by the United States Constitution. 

The current race is simply to decide who gets to let the American people know that they've been living in the New World Order for years - as envisioned and enacted by the Bush, Clinton and Obama presidencies.

Most people simply refuse to study and take an honest look at what has been prepared. Many similarities to the Lutheran Synods where the supposed orthodox conservatives are just as complicit as the Homosexual and abusive emergent sects in the rise of the New World Religion: the religion of the Antichrist.



---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "The Christian voting bloc will decide the US 2012 ...":

Brett -

I find your response to be needlessly and unrealistically fanciful and philosophical. You propose the following in your response:

>>>>> ......If the top two candidates were Joseph Stalin and Mao Tse Tung you would ...... <<<<<<<

I don't deal with "ifs." My commentary was about the practical.

Furthermore, I don't understand how you can conclude your response with bringing up "justification by faith alone," and thus then disqualifying my commentary assertions. If you would have read what I said - I qualified myself by saying" "professed" Christians...........

Spare me the intricacies of philosophical theology. I only deal with practical theology.

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org
www.moralmatters.org

All Saints Sunday - 2012. The Beatitudes




All Saints Sunday, 2012


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn # 656        Behold a Host                        2:39
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual          
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed                p. 22
The Sermon Hymn # 463     For All the Saints                   4:31 

The Blessings of the Gospel

The Communion Hymn #  371         Jesus Thy Blood        4:6
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 657        Beautiful Savior         4:24  

KJV Revelation 7:2 And I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the seal of the living God: and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea, 3 Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads. 4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel. 5 Of the tribe of Juda were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of the tribe of Aser were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nepthalim were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses were sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of the tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of the tribe of Zabulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand. 9 After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands; 10 And cried with a loud voice, saying, Salvation to our God which sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb. 11 And all the angels stood round about the throne, and about the elders and the four beasts, and fell before the throne on their faces, and worshipped God, 12 Saying, Amen: Blessing, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving, and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever. Amen. 13 And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they? 14 And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. 15 Therefore are they before the throne of God, and serve him day and night in his temple: and he that sitteth on the throne shall dwell among them. 16 They shall hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall the sun light on them, nor any heat. 17 For the Lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall feed them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes.

KJV Matthew 5:1 And seeing the multitudes, he went up into a mountain: and when he was set, his disciples came unto him: 2 And he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying, 3 Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. 4 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted. 5 Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. 6 Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled. 7 Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy. 8 Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God. 9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God. 10 Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. 11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. 12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

ALL SAINTS' DAY

O almighty and everlasting God, who through Thine only-begotten and beloved Son, Jesus Christ, wilt sanctify all Thine elected and beloved: Give us grace to follow their faith, hope, and charity, that we together with them may obtain eternal life: through Thy Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.



The Blessings of the Gospel



Lenski:
Neither time nor place are specified. While we may be interested in both, Matthew’s Jewish readers should have their whole attention centered on the substance of the sermon. So the preliminaries are brief: only a transitional δέ, the multitudes, the disciples, and what we may gather from the sermon. From Luke 6:12, etc., we learn that Jesus had chosen the Twelve as apostles, that other disciples were present in addition to a great concourse of people. The sermon itself presupposes a degree of advancement on the part of the disciples. Only in v. 20 does it refer to entering the kingdom, a word that was evidently intended for those who had not yet entered. In v. 12 it refers to the Twelve, associating them with the prophets of old; and in v. 19 it distinguishes between the teachers who shall be least and those that shall be great in the kingdom. According to Luke, Jesus went up into the mountain the night before and retired for prayer. It was in the morning, just after the Twelve had been chosen, that Jesus chose a spot where all could see and hear him, a large level place between the heights or along the mountainside, and there began his teaching...
“The mountain,” with its Greek article, is best taken to refer to the one right at hand, R. 756. The expression is similar to our “into the woods,” “into the field,” when we have no special woods or field in mind. Yet some stress the article: “the New Testament Sinai,” “the mount of sacred history,” but this stress refers to what the sermon now to be preached made of this mountain. The locality seems to have been near Capernaum; late tradition takes it to be the Horns of Hattin.
“The multitudes,” with its Greek article, points back to 4:25, and thus strengthens the inference that the sermon was spoken at the height of Jesus’ ministry in Galilee. It was customary for teachers, and for preachers to sit cross-legged while speaking, the hearers assuming the same position. The writer saw a speaker sitting thus on a raised platform in a mosque in Damascus in 1925, another in the mosque of the dervishes in Constantinople, the hearers in each case sitting on the floor. The word disciples means more than pupils or learners, namely those who have learned, who have imbibed their master’s spirit. They may still learn, but what they have already learned is what makes them “disciples.”
            Lenski, R. C. H.: The Interpretation of St. Matthew's Gospel. Minneapolis, MN. : Augsburg Publishing House, 1961, S. 181

KJV Matthew 5:6 Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.

The Beatitudes are Gospel blessings that pour out God’s love on us and also teach us the meaning of the Gospel. We could say that these special verses are a sermon on the Gospel itself.

KJV Matthew 5:3 Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

Many verses in the Bible make us stop and wonder, because they go against our normal thinking. That is how we distinguish between reason and faith. Our human reason begins to rebel, so we have to subordinate our first thoughts to what the Word of God reveals. The Old Adam naturally rebels against God’s revelation.

When people argue from reason, they are also arguing against faith in the Word.

In this case we can look at the opposite, the opposite of poor in spirit. Those would be the haughty, proud, and self-centered. What do they say about the Gospel? They do not need the Gospel. They have no need for repentance. They do not like something that takes the focus off themselves. How can they be forgiven when they have no use for forgiveness? I get to read a lot of liberal theology, and pride is at the center of it.
Pride – I am too smart to believe this.
Pride – I have my own personal version of this doctrine.
Pride – Only a few of us have this special knowledge – we are super-smart.
Pride – I obey the law, even if it is my law. That law makes me good.

Poor in spirit is the opposite. Before the glory and majesty of God, the poor in spirit are humble, repentant, and longing for forgiveness of sin. Luther said many times that the powerful and worldly-wise were not suited for the Gospel, which was aimed at the poor, needy, broken sinners.

If you want to meet humble sinners, do some jail visitation. They know they deserve to be locked up because they did 10 times more than the charges against them. They are broken and contrite because the steel bars remind them of where they have put themselves.

Who wants an antibiotic? A runner on his 10th mile? Or a patient lying in bed, burning up with a fever, with a throat so sore that swallowing hurts and the ears pop in an unpleasant way? Often that medicine produces instant relief as the healing begins.

The Gospel is medicine for the sick, for the poor in spirit.



KJV Matthew 5:4 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.

This Sunday often marks a day where the departed are remembered. Bethany began with the spirit and work of three people who have passed on to eternal life, Brenda, Cliff, and Cleo.

In another city, Walt Boeckler was eager to form an independent Lutheran congregation.

In another city and state, my mother helped in getting a home and a place where the congregation could worship locally and across the Internet, first by phone, then by video.

Someone in another state altogether died a believer, helping out in publications and in other ways, loving Jesus Priceless Treasure. “That was your best book.”

And there are many more we have lost collectively. I saw the photo of my friend from junior high, high school, and college. He was deeply loved as a public school teacher and Sunday School teacher. Leo had a weak heart but a big heart. He could never be an athlete so he trained athletes and they named a tournament after him.

Bruce was our best friend at Yale, earning his second doctorate. He discussed theology all the time with me and made many good points on the side of conservative Christianity – all the more impressive coming from a Yale scientist and future Harvard Medical instructor.

Collectively we have lost many who were dear to us. That we miss them so much is a measure of how much we treasured them. Christians are blessed because of the comfort afforded by the Gospel. This is but one stage before eternal life.

KJV Matthew 5:5 Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.

Commentary - KJV Psalm 37:11 But the meek shall inherit the earth; and shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace.

This is not a promise to inherit the new earth, at the end of time, but to inherit this earth. “Meek” is the quality of Christ – not being angry and bitter over reverses in fortune and harm done by others.

The abundance of peace comes from accepting in faith the last verse in the beatitudes – the worst promise of all. Why is that?

The proud, arrogant, and spiteful are always in turmoil. I like Luther’s expression – they are so angry they would tear up trees by their roots if they could. They get away with a lot because bullies make people shrink back and cower in fear. But this same proud spirit turns them upside down in time and their fall from glory is very difficult to bear. One District President was the choice for the top job, but he was asked by his peers to step down as DP, then defeated in his quest for the big job. I remember when the same bully told my pastor-friend, “You can voluntarily quit your call and get 3 months pay or I will fire you on the spot with no pay.” Isn’t that sweet?
The meek do what they can, knowing they are mortal sinners, but accept what comes their way from the cross.

KJV Matthew 11:29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.

KJV Matthew 5:6 Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.

Hunger and thirst remind us of our most basic needs. If we have plenty of food, we also need something to hydrate us. If we have water alone, which is good, we also need the calories from food. Those are two great bodily needs.

But I also see a parallel to the two sacraments. Holy Baptism is related to water, to washing, to the spring that refreshed the Israelites, and the water from the well in John 4. Jesus gives “living water.”

KJV John 4:14 But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.

Righteousness is forgiveness of sin.

Lenski:
No man, however wise and powerful, has ever discovered a way to turn a guilty, sinful soul into a righteous one. Men justify and declare themselves righteous, but this amounts to no more than the criminal’s denial of his crime and never stands before the court which has the full evidence of his guilt. But what is beyond all human ability is brought about by Christ who by his holy life and sacrificial death met the demands of God’s norm of right, met them in our stead and now transfers his perfect righteousness to us through faith and thus wins our pardon and acquittal before the divine judgment bar. “Righteousness” cannot here mean the power of right in human affairs in the world of men generally; for the passive “shall be filled” denotes a gift of God to certain persons, rendering them “righteous” in his sight. It cannot denote a virtue, the so-called acquired righteousness, when men live righteously and do what is right. The passive verb shuts out also this.
Lenski, R. C. H.: The Interpretation of St. Matthew's Gospel. Minneapolis, MN. : Augsburg Publishing House, 1961, S. 189.

Forensic means – in the courtroom – but it is misapplied by UOJ fanatics. They claim the entire world has been judged innocent. What the term has always mean in Christian theology is this – through faith in Jesus we are declared innocent of all sin:
  1. Great and terrible sins.
  2. Many sins, all sins, not just a few.
  3. Sins we cannot conquer, not just those we conquer, which is impossible anyway.

To be filled means to receive a constant supply of forgiveness, which we receive in faith.

KJV Matthew 5:7 Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.

This area is very much Gospel-influenced. I see that all the time. I was in a crowded gas station when two of us bumped into each other. I apologized, and the other man apologized. Then he added, “No, it was really my fault.” I had a situation in a Phoenix restaurant where one man wanted to fight me because we barely touched while standing in line. He was offended and wanted his honor restored. Someone like that is going to have a short life.

Faith is pre-supposed, as Luther says. One cannot be merciful without faith. That is why so many synodical officials are merciless and vindictive – they lack faith. The fruit cannot grow without the tree (faith). Or – the corrupt tree produces evil fruit.

The forgiven are also forgiving. If you want a peaceful life, spend a lot of time asking for forgiveness (repentance) and being forgiving. There are plenty of annoying things that should be examined with care and seen for how minor they really are. One useful tool is to say, “Am I annoying in the same way or do I have similar annoying traits or habits?” If the answer is yes, then there is no reason to bear a grudge over such things. Some things are just plain funny when seen this way.

I read biographies and I cannot fathom why people rehearse their grudges against their parents. The more they do that, the more childish they look. I was laughing today about a family reunion where we got there so early the hosts were still in bathrobes. My father did not want to be late. At the time all of us kids were out of sorts for waking up early, getting there with nothing to do for hours, and for the awkwardness of hosts in bathrobes. Today it made me laugh because our son said, “Everyone has OCD in this family.”

Some want to go around forgiving murderers and false teachers (murderers of souls) as if that is Jesus-like. One of my witty friends says, “They are more evangelical than Jesus.” That is actually the wrong use of the keys, because the unrepentant should receive the binding key until they repent. The unrepentant cannot comprehend forgiveness or receive it. They are like mice that get into the communion host, devouring what they do not understand.

KJV Matthew 5:8 Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.

KJV Psalm 24:4 He that hath clean hands, and a pure heart; who hath not lifted up his soul unto vanity, nor sworn deceitfully.

KJV 1 Timothy 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God our Saviour, and Lord Jesus Christ, which is our hope; 2 Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord. 3 As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine, 4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do. 5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned: 6 From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling; 7 Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.

Pure in heart means not being a scheming, dishonest, covetous manipulator. Like many other faults, these short-comings will often be rewarded in our secular society and fallen congregations, but they are not God-pleasing.

To see God means to experience Him as He is – all loving and powerful, gracious and kindly. The wonderful Durer painting I have featured for All Saints is a representation of this beatific vision, for seeing God also meaning communicating His nature to others.

That makes many hymns difficult to sing, because they offer such a glorious picture, faithful to the Word, that emotions easily well up in us. However, unbelievers do not experience this and long for soda pop concerts with loud rock music.

As I have often mentioned, Luther observed that unbelievers do not see the fruit of Christian faith, but mock it. They only see trouble, poverty, oppression, difficulties. They laugh and say, “Why are you Christians always so sick?” Their unbelieving clergy chuckle and say, “You should do things my way, instead of being a sucker.” One LCA leader said his motto was, “Use others before they use you.”

I know a pastor’s family where they seem to have nothing in material benefits, but they make do and create such a paradise of love in their home that I have warned them their children will be utterly spoiled. I say that in a joking way because they turn a lack of money into ways of doing without. And all those stories are inspiring and charming.

KJV Matthew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.

Lenski:
At peace with God and thus themselves filled with sweet peace, they live in peace, if possible, with all men and work to keep and to make peace wherever peace is threatened or lost. Theirs is the work of true Christians who follow in the footsteps of the Prince of Peace. Nor is this “peace at any price,” which ignores confessional principles and is unwilling to contend for the faith once delivered to the saints (Jude 3). These are not unionistic peacemakers who combine contrary doctrines by agreeing to disagree. Truth of God comes first, peace with men second. Friends are dear, the Word of our greatest Friend dearest. No “blessed” was spoken by Jesus upon the disrupters of the church who insist on their false views, nor upon those who regard the peace and the fellowship of their brother-confessors as being of slight value, so that they may run after other fellowships. The true peace of the church is a blessed possession; we cannot guard it too closely. Contentious, stubborn, obstreperous church members—this beatitude ought to make them impossible. Also in the world, wherever strife arises, the followers of Christ work for peace in the spirit of their Master.
The passive “shall be called” implies “by God,” for he alone can bestow the title “God’s sons” in truth and in reality. Here, too, the future tense means that God shall call them his sons now when they prove their relation to him by their peacemaking.
Lenski, R. C. H.: The Interpretation of St. Matthew's Gospel. Minneapolis, MN. : Augsburg Publishing House, 1961, S. 193.

Those who desire sound doctrine are called trouble-makers. Those who want to merge all confessions are called peaceful, kind, loving, and accepting. Luther was contentious because he said “This is My Body” and wrote it on the table in chalk.

But peace comes from confessing the same truths of the Bible, not conspiring to support falsehood. God is the one who decides who the peacemakers are. He alone names them.

KJV Matthew 5:11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. 12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

This is the difficult beatitude. How can this be a blessing? Yet Luther often mentioned the “blessed holy cross.” We only bear that when we teach the truth.
When something is attacked, suppressed, and silenced by the great and wise within the visible church – that is the cross to bear.

Luther’s Gospel was taught in the midst of the one and only church of its time, which is much the way people see their own denominations today.

Paul too was the convert (boo hiss) in the midst of the legal religion, teaching the despised and hated religion that was in the midst of Judaism and hated. Opponents looked for ways to get rid of him, from stoning and riots to execution.

The cross means that God has blessed the work.