Friday, January 11, 2013

A Mere Mention? - Or a Pattern of Constant Promotion?

Gregory the Theologian


Unknown has left a new comment on your post "Find This Sentence - More Propaganda from Concordi...":

A sincere question from a Papist:

How is mentioning Gregory and Basil "promoting Roman Catholicism"? I thought Lutherans accepted the first seven ecumenical councils, and had no problems with the early Church Fathers...


---

The best evidence of their value and power lies in the fact that for fourteen centuries they have been a mine whence the greatest theologians of Christendom have drawn treasures of wisdom to illustrate and support their own teaching on the deepest mysteries of the Catholic Faith.

***

GJ - The final sentence is obviously designed to conclude that this saint or these saints prove the infallible dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church. 

The purpose of both websites is to recruit more Roman Catholics. They do a splendid job with this, and Lutherans hardly lift a finger to do the same. Instead, the "conservative" Lutherans either promote Fuller Seminary, Eastern Orthodoxy, or Roman Catholicism.

When Roman Catholics do this for Luther, I may...reciprocate. But don't count on it.

McCain, Weedon, and Otten have a pattern of promoting every doctrine except Luther's. 

To celebrate the Reformation, Otten promoted The Facts about Luther, a vile and deceitful book against Luther, based on the ravings of a Reformation-era Struwwelpeter

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "A Mere Mention? - Or a Pattern of Constant Promoti...":

While the (W)ELS excommunicates it's clergy and members for enduring in the one true faith by teaching and defending One Justification solely by Faith Alone - there is one faint glimmer of hope...

The Core
Eating wings for Jesus!

http://youtu.be/Lnmm3oTuAwI




Luther's Sermon - The First Sunday after Epiphany


Norma Boeckler



FIRST SUNDAY AFTER EPIPHANY.

This sermon appeared in the editions of Luther’s works in 1528 and 1540, and in the complete Wittenberg Edition of 1563 , volume 4, fol. 487 ff.; also in the Eisleben supplementary volumes, volume 1, fol. 140 ff. It also appeared four times in pamphlet form during the year 1523. The first time under the title: “A Sermon on the Gospel of Luke, 2 chapter. On the Sunday after the day of the Three Holy Kings; in which is set forth how they fare who are true Christians; also how we are to seek Christ only in the Temple, that is, in the divine Scriptures. Doctor Martin Luther.

Preached in Wittenberg, 1523.”

German text: Erlangen edition, volume 2, page 1; Walch edition, volume 2, Colossians. 589; St. Louis Walch, volume 2, Col. 429.

TEXT:

Luke 2:41-52.And his parents went every year to Jerusalem at the feast of the passover. And when he was twelve years old, they went up alter the custom of the feast; and when they had fulfilled the days, as they were returning, the boy Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem, and his parents knew it not; but supposing him to be in the company, they went a day’s journey; and they sought for him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance: and when they found him not, they returned to Jerusalem, seeking for him. And it came to pass, after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the teachers, both hearing them, and asking them questions: and all that heard him were amazed at his understanding and his answers. And when they saw him, they were astonished; and his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, thy father and I sought thee sorrowing. And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? knew ye not that I must be in my Father’s house? And they understood not the saying which he spake unto them. And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth; and he was subject unto them: and his mother kept all these sayings in her heart.

And Jesus advanced in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and men.

CONTENTS:

AN EXAMPLE OF THE CROSS. AND OF CONSOLATION UNDER THE CROSS.
* The Gist of this Gospel.

I. THE EXAMPLE OF THE CROSS.

1. The nature of this example 2-4.

* God can make that sorrow to us which was our joy, and that a joy which was our sorrow

2. The application and right use of this example 6-7.

3. More like examples are found in the Scriptures 8f., Reasons why God permits his saints to be so severely tried and allows such trials to be published, a. The first reason 9. b. The second reason 10-11.

II. THE EXAMPLE OF THE CONSOLATION UNDER THE CROSS.

1. How this example teaches where we are to seek and find comfort 12-14.

2. How the mouth of the papists is closed by this example 14f.

* Of the Word of God and the holy fathers; of the doctrines of men. a. Outside of God’s Word no comfort is found 14-15. b. Whether we are to seek for comfort in the writings of the holy fathers 15. c. How the rapists rob God’s Word of its glory by three kinds of false teachings 16-20. d. What we are to answer the papists when they wish to insist the observance of human doctrines and decrees are necessary for salvation. 1 . The first answer 21.

2. The second answer.22.

3. The third answer 23-26.

4. The fourth answer 27-28.

3. Review 29.

* What we are to answer when the papists appeal to the Church and their councils

* Of the growth and development of the child Jesus 31.

I. AN EXAMPLE OF THE CROSS.

OR SANCTIFIED SUFFERING.

1. This is a Gospel that presents to us an example of the holy cross, showing us through what experiences those have to pass who are Christians, and how they ought to bear their sorrow. For he who desires to be a Christian must expect to help bear the cross. For God will place him between the spurs and thoroughly test him that he may be humble and no one will come to Christ without suffering. Of this we have here an example, which we ought to imitate and shall now consider.

2. Although the holy mother Mary, who was highly blessed and upon whom many favors were bestowed, had undoubtedly the greatest delight in her child, yet the Lord so ruled that her joy was not without sorrow and like all others she did not attain complete blessedness until she entered heaven. For this reason she had to suffer so much sorrow, pain and anguish on earth. It was her first great sorrow that she had to give birth to her child in Bethlehem, in a strange town, where she found no room with her babe except in a stable. Then her second sad experience was that soon after the six weeks of her purification she was compelled to flee with her child into Egypt, a strange country, which was indeed a poor consolation. She undoubtedly experienced many more like trials, which have not been recorded.

3. One of them is related here, when her son caused her so much anxiety, by tarrying behind in the temple and letting her seek him so long, and she could not find him. This alarmed and grieved her so that she almost despaired, as her words indicate: “Behold, thy father and I, sought thee sorrowing.” For we may well imagine that thoughts like these may have passed through her mind: “Behold this child is only mine, this I know very well, and I know that God has entrusted him to me and commanded me to take care of him; why is it then that he is taken from me? It is my fault, for I have not sufficiently taken care of him and guarded him. Perhaps God does not deem me worthy to watch over this child and will take him from me again.” She was undoubtedly greatly frightened and her heart trembled and was filled with grief.

4. Here you see what she experienced. Although she is the mother of a child in whom she might have gloried before all mothers, and although her joy was immeasurably greater than any she had ever felt, yet you perceive how God deprives her of all happiness, in that she can no longer call herself the mother of Jesus. In her great dismay she probably wished, she had never known her child and was tempted to greater sins than any mother had ever committed.

5. In the same manner the Lord our God can take from us our joy and comfort, if he so desires, and cause us the greatest sorrow with the very things that are our greatest joy, and, on the other hand, give us the greatest delight in the things that terrify us most. For it was the greatest joy of Mary that she was the mother of this child, but now he has become the cause of her greatest sorrow. Thus we are afraid of nothing more than of sin and death, yet God can comfort us so that we may boast, as St. Paul says in Romans 7, that sin served to the end that we became justified and that we longed for death and desire to die.

6. The great sorrow of the mother of Christ, who was deprived of her child, came upon her in order that even her trust in God might be taken from her. For she had reason to fear that God was angry with her and would no longer have her to be the mother of his Son. Nobody will understand what she suffered who has not passed through similar experiences. Therefore we should apply this example to ourselves, for it was not recorded for her sake, but for our benefit. She is now at the end of her sorrows; therefore we should profit by her example and be prepared to bear our sorrow if a similar affliction befall us.

7. When God vouchsafes to us a strong faith and a firm trust in him, so that we are assured he is our gracious God and we can depend upon him, then we are in paradise. But when God permits our hearts to be discouraged and we believe that he takes from us Christ our Lord; when our conscience feels that we have lost him and amidst trembling and despair our confidence is gone, then we are truly in misery and distress. For even if we are not conscious of any special sin, yet in such a condition we tremble and doubt whether God still cares for us; just as Mary here doubts and knows not whether God still deems her worthy to be the mother of his Son. Our heart thinks in the time of trial thus: God has indeed given me a strong faith, but perhaps he will take it from me and will no longer want me as his child. Only strong minds can endure such temptations and there are not many people whom God tests to this degree. Yet we must be prepared, so that we may not despair if such trials should come upon us.

8. We find many examples of this in the Scriptures, as for instance in Joshua 7:6-7. God had given to Joshua great and strong promises, telling him that he would exterminate the heathen and charging him to attack his enemies courageously and vigorously, which he also did. But what happened? When his faith was strong he,sent three thousand men against a city to take it. They were proud, seeing that it was a small city with only a few people to defend it. When the men of Israel approached, the enemy sallied forth from the city and defeated the people. Then Joshua fell to the earth upon his face before the ark of Jehovah until the evening, lifting up his voice and lamenting before God, saying: “Alas, O Lord Jehovah, wherefore hast thou at all brought this people over the Jordan, to deliver us into the hand of the Amorites, to cause us to perish?” His faith had become weak and he was utterly discouraged, so that God himself had to raise him up again. Thus God deals with his great saints, whom he sometimes deprives of Christ, that is, of their faith and confidence.

9. But God does all this out of his superabundant grace and goodness in order that we might perceive on every hand how kindly and lovingly the Father deals with us and tries us, so that our faith may be developed and become continually stronger and stronger. And he does this especially so as to guard his children against a twofold danger which might otherwise threaten them. In the first place, being strong in their own mind and arrogant, they might ultimately depend upon themselves and believe they are able to accomplish everything in their own strength. For this reason God sometimes permits their faith to grow weak and to be prostrated, so that they might see who they are and be forced to confess: Even if I would believe, I cannot. Thus the omnipotent God humbles his saints and keeps them in their true knowledge. For nature and reason will always boast of the gifts of God and depend upon them. Therefore God must lead us to a recognition of the fact that it is he who puts faith in our heart and that we cannot produce it ourselves. Thus the fear of God and trust in him must not be separated from one another, for we need them both, in order that we may not become presumptuous and overconfident, depending upon ourselves. This is one of the reasons why God leads his saints through such great trials.

10. Another reason is, that he wants to give us an example. For if in the Scriptures we had no examples of saints who passed through the same experiences, we should be unable to bear our trials and would imagine that we alone are thus afflicted, that God never dealt with any one in this manner; therefore my suffering must be a sign of God’s displeasure with me. But when we see that the Virgin Mary and other saints have also suffered, we are thereby comforted and need not despair, for their example shows that we should calmly and patiently wait until God comes and strengthens us.

11. We find many examples of similar trials in the Scriptures, and here we might refer to the words of David in Psalm 31:22: “As for me, I said in my haste, I am cut off from before thine eyes,” just as we sometimes think that God does not want us. Such trials are unendurable and severe beyond measure, wherefore the saints passing through them lament greatly, for if God would not deliver them they would be in hell. Compared with these trials other temptations and sorrows are trivial, as for instance when our possessions and honors are taken from us, or when the innocent babes were murdered and Jesus was forced to flee into Egypt. The prophet speaks of this in Psalm 94:17: “Unless Jehovah had been my help, my soul had soon dwelt in silence.” So great is the terror and anguish of such visitations. But God permitted them that we might lay hold of these examples, be comforted and saved from despair. At the end of our lives we must also pass through like trials. Therefore we must be armed and prepared for them.




II. AN EXAMPLE OF COMFORT UNDER THE CROSS.

12. Such is the narrative and example of the great sorrow as it is portrayed in this Gospel, but we are also shown where comfort may be found. The parents of Jesus lost him, going a day’s journey and seeking for him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance, but found him not. They return to Jerusalem and after a search of three days he is found by them in the temple. Here God has pointed out how we can find consolation and strength in all our sorrows, and especially in these great trials, and how we can find Christ the Lord, namely by seeking him in the temple. Jesus said to his parents: “Knew ye not that I must be in my Father’s house?”

13. The words of Luke “and they understood not the saying which he spake unto them” are especially to be noted here. With these words he silenced the idle talk of those who exalted and praised the Virgin Mary too highly, asserting that she knew everything and could not err. For you see here how the Lord permits her to seek her child for a long time in vain, till she finds him in the temple after three days. In addition to this, Jesus seems to reprimand her when he says: “How is it that ye sought me? knew ye not that I must be in my Father’s house?” She understood not the saying which he spake to her. Consequently all the idle talk to which we have referred is nothing but falsehood, and the Virgin Mary does not need this fabricated and mendacious praise. God concealed much from her and led her through many trials, so that she might remain humble and not think herself better than others.

14. But the consolation of which I have spoken is that Christ is only found in the temple, that is to say in the house of God. But what is the house of God? Is it not the whole creation? It is indeed true that God is everywhere, but he is especially present in the Holy Scriptures, in his Word, more than anywhere else. We learn therefore here that nobody can presume to derive any comfort from anything but the Word of God; you will find the Son only in the temple. Now look at the mother of Jesus who does not yet understand this and does not know that she must seek for him in the temple. When she sought for him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance, and not at the right place, she did not find him.

15. Therefore I have often said and say again, that in the Christian church nothing should be preached but the pure Word of God. With this the Gospel agrees when it says that they did not find the Lord among their kinsfolk and acquaintance. It is therefore wrong to say that we must believe what the councils have decreed, or what Jerome, Augustine and other holy fathers have written. We must point out the place where Christ may be found, which he himself points out when he says that he must be in his Father’s house, which means that he can only be found in the Word of God. We should therefore not believe that our conscience may trust in the teachings of the holy fathers or derive comfort from them. Now if they say to you: Should we not believe the holy fathers? you may reply: Christ is not found among the kinsfolk and acquaintance. It would indeed be well if Christians generally were to heed this example from the Gospel and use it as a maxim against every doctrine that does not agree with the Word of God.

16. But in order to emphasize this more and to make it clearer, let us see what other doctrines have been proclaimed that do not agree with the Word of God. Up to this time we have had three different systems of doctrine. The first and coarsest is that of St. Thomas (if indeed he be a saint). This was taken from the system of pagan science and art which was written by that great light of nature, Aristotle. Now they say that his philosophy is like a bright, shining plate, and the Word of Christ is like the sun. And as the sun shines upon the plate, causing it to gleam and glitter all the brighter, so the divine light shines upon the light of nature and illumines it. With this beautiful simile they have introduced pagan doctrines into the Christian church, which have been taught and cultivated by the great universities and in which teachers and preachers have been instructed. The devil has taught them to speak in this way. Thus the Word of God is trodden under foot, for when it is given full play, it subverts all these satanic doctrines.

17. In the second place, they have taught and prescribed human laws, called the institutions and precepts of the holy Christian church. Thereby these fools have thought to lead men to heaven and to be able to comfort and pacify our conscience. These human laws prevail to such a degree that like a great deluge they cover the whole world and have submerged everything else, so that it is almost impossible that any one may be saved from going down to hell. For they clamor unceasingly as though they were insane: This has been decreed by the holy councils and that has been commanded by the church; we have observed this a long time, shall we not believe it now?

18. Therefore we should reply to this from the Gospel, as I said: Even if Mary, the Holy Virgin, had done this, it would not be surprising if she had erred. She was the mother of God, and yet she did not know where to find Christ; she sought him among her kinsfolk and acquaintance and failed to find him. Now if she did not succeed in finding Christ among her kinsfolk, but had finally to come to the temple, how shall we expect to find him outside of the Word of God in human doctrines, in the decrees of the councils or the teachings of the scholastics? Bishops and councils have undoubtedly not possessed the gift of the Holy Spirit in as large a measure as Mary. If she erred, why should not they also be mistaken who fancy to find Christ elsewhere but in his Father’s house, that is in the Word of God?

19. If therefore you find one who adheres to these two different systems of doctrine, believing them to be right and trusting in them, ask him whether he is quite confident that they will comfort his soul in the hour of death or under the judgment and the wrath of God, whether he will be able to say then with a conscience undaunted: This has been declared and decreed by the pope and the bishops in their councils, I depend upon that and am quite certain I shall not fail? He will soon be obliged to say: How can I be so certain of this? Thus, when it comes to the point and you are in the presence of death, your conscience will say: It is indeed true, the councils have decreed this, but what if they were mistaken, and who knows whether they were right? Then when you are in such doubts, you cannot hold out, and Satan will assail you and hurl you to the ground, so that you lie there helpless.

20. In the third place, besides these two theories they have also pointed us to the Holy Scriptures and said, that above every other doctrine the laws and decrees of the pope in matters of faith must be observed. But here they except the teachings of some of the holy fathers, who have interpreted the Scriptures, and whom they have exalted so highly that they place them on the same level with the pope of Rome, or a little above him, asserting even that they could not err, and clamoring: How could it be possible for the holy fathers not to understand the Scriptures? But let these fools say what they wish, always remind them of the words of Christ: “Knew ye not that I must be in my Father’s house?” We must above all things have the Word of God and cling to it, for Christ will be there and in no where else. Therefore it is in vain that you seek him elsewhere. For how can you convince me that Christ must be found in the writings of the holy fathers?



21. This Gospel is therefore a severe thrust at every doctrine and every comfort of any kind that is not derived from the Word of God. You may therefore say: It matters not how highly you exalt reason and the light of nature, I reserve the right of not putting my trust in it. The councils have issued decrees and the pope or the holy fathers have taught what they wish, but that does not concern me; I will not depend upon them. We will soon agree if they decide and propose what they please, but grant me the liberty to say: If it pleases me, I shall observe it, but not as something that is especially meritorious. They will however not grant us this right; for they are not satisfied to let us use our own discretion in these things, but demand in addition that we base our trust and comfort on them, teaching that if we trust in them, it is as much as if we place our confidence in Christ and the Holy Spirit. We can not tolerate their delusions according to which they think that they are doing a good work who keep their laws, and again, that it is a sin not to keep them. For they declare that the precepts and doctrines of the pope and the church come from the Holy Spirit and are the Word of God, for which reason we ought to believe and observe them. But this is an obvious and shameless lie; for how can they prove it?

22. But, they say, the Christian church is always led by the Holy Spirit, who will not permit the church to err or go wrong. To this we answer with what we said before: However good the church may be, it has never possessed the Spirit in as large a measure as Mary, who although she was led by the Spirit, erred nevertheless, so that we might learn from her experience. If she herself is uncertain, how can you make me certain?

Whither should we then go? We must also come into the temple, that is to say we must cling to the Word of God, which is secure and will not fail us and where we will certainly find Christ. I must therefore always be with the Word, if I cleave to it. If the Word of God goes conquering through death and remains alive, I must also pass through death to life, and nothing can hinder or destroy me, neither sin nor death, nor the devil. The comfort and boldness I derive from the Word of God cannot be engendered by any other doctrine, for none can be compared with it.

23. Therefore it is necessary that we understand this clearly and not place our confidence in human doctrines and the teachings of the holy fathers.

God has demonstrated this by many other examples in order to teach us not in the least to depend upon men, as the saints also may sometimes make mistakes. We read for instance in Acts 15:5f that not more than eighteen years after the ascension of Christ the apostles and the majority of the Christians held a conference. The question was raised whether the Gentiles should be compelled to submit to circumcision. There stood up the leaders of the sect of the Pharisees who believed and said: It is necessary to circumcise them, and to charge them to keep the law of Moses. There was a great commotion and all seemed to hold the same opinion. Only Peter, Paul, Barnabas and James were opposed to this view, and Peter especially rose up and said unto them: God has given the Holy Spirit unto the Gentiles who have heard the Gospel from me, even as he did unto us; and he made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith. Now if they received the Holy Spirit and were not circumcised, why would you force them and put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? But we believe that we shall be saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, in like manner as they.

24. You notice that many Christians were at this council who were true believers, at a time when the church was in its youthful vigor and almost perfect, and yet God permits them all to err with the exception of three or four men. If these few men had not protested, erroneous doctrines would have been taught and a law not in accordance with the Gospel of Christ been established. Yet we are such blind fools as to say continually: The councils and the church have commanded this or that, and as they cannot be in error, their decrees must be observed.

25. Later on we read that even the most prominent leaders, both Peter and Barnabas, fell into error and all the other Jews with them. Then Paul alone rose up and rebuked Peter publicly, as he himself writes in Galatians 2:11. Now if these holy councils and holy men erred, why should we put our trust in our own councils? For they cannot for an instant be compared with the councils held by the apostles.

26. Why does God permit these things to occur? He does it that we may not depend upon or derive comfort from the words and doctrines of men, however holy they may be, but place our confidence only in the Word of God. If then even an apostle came or an angel from heaven, as St. Paul says in Galatians 1:8-9, who would preach another Gospel, we should openly declare it is not the Word of God and refuse to listen to it. Do not forget that the child can be found in no other place but the temple, or the house of God. Mary indeed sought him among the kinsfolk, who are the great, learned and pious people, but she did not find him among them.



27. There are many similar examples and types elsewhere in the Gospel which point out the same truth, namely, that nothing should be taught but the Word of God and no other doctrine should be accepted, because Christ can be found only in the Scriptures. Thus we read in the Gospel for Christmas, Luke 2:12, where the angel, who announced the birth of Christ, said to the shepherds: “And this is the sign unto you: Ye shall find a babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, and lying in a manger.” Why does he not direct them to Mary and Joseph, but only points them to the swaddling clothes and the manger? The reason is that God will not point us to any saint, not even to the holy mother herself, for they may all err. Therefore a special place must be pointed out where Christ is, namely the manger, where he surely may be found, even if Joseph and Mary were not present.

This signifies that Christ is completely wrapped in the Scriptures, just as the body is wrapped in the clothes. The manger is the preaching of the Gospel, where he is lying and where he is apprehended, and from which we take our food. Now it would indeed appear that the child should lie where Joseph and Mary are, these great and holy people. Yet the angel points only to the manger, which he will not have overlooked or dishonored. It is an insignificant and simple expression, but Christ is found in it.

28. The same truth is also pointed out in other narratives, as for instance in that of holy Simeon, who had received a promise from God that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord Christ. He came in the Spirit into the temple, found the child and received him into his arms. But here it is only emphasized that he finds Christ in the temple. From all this we learn that God would warn us against human doctrines, however excellent they may be, advising us not to depend upon them, but cleave to the only true guide, the Word of God. Lay aside everything else. Their declarations and decrees may indeed be good and right, but our heart cannot trust in them.

29. This then is the comfort we derive from this Gospel in our great trials, of which we have spoken above. We know that consolation may be found only in the Scriptures, the Word of God. For this reason God caused this to be recorded, so that we might learn these lessons, as St. Paul writes to the Romans: “For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that through patience and through comfort of the Scriptures we might have hope.” Romans 15:4. Here he says that the Scriptures are comforting, that they impart patience and comfort.

Consequently there can be nothing else that comforts the soul, not even in the most trifling temptations. For everything else with which man comforts himself, however great it may be, is altogether uncertain, and the heart inquires constantly: Who knows whether it is right? if I only were sure about it! etc. But when the heart clings to the Word of God, it may say without any wavering: This is the Word of God, which can not lie nor err, of this I am certain. And this is our greatest struggle that we keep and hold firmly to the Word; for if that is taken from the heart, man is lost.

30. Let us then be prepared for their representations and expostulations to the effect that the Christian church can not err, so that we may know how to meet them, and say: Here is not the word of man, but the Word of God.

We read in this Gospel that his mother, Mary, was filled with the Holy Spirit, and yet she erred. Likewise we read in the Acts that there was a Christian council of such who believed and who had the Spirit, and yet they stumbled and would have established an unchristian law, if others had not protested. We should therefore not believe any council or, saint, if they come without the Word of God. This is then the sum total of this Gospel, and if anything else is to be said on it, we will let those explain it who have leisure; but he who studies it faithfully, will easily understand it.

31. Some have broken their heads over the meaning of the words of Luke where he says that Christ advanced in wisdom and grace, for they assume that as true God he possessed all wisdom and grace from the time of his conception. But here they have shamefully altered the text with their commentaries. Therefore refrain from such idle talk and let the words stand just as they are without any commentary. We must understand them simply as saying that he grew continually and waxed strong in the Spirit, just as any other man, as we have explained it more fully in the Gospel for the Sunday after Christmas.

This Blog Describes the Experiences of Others


The local paper featured an article about an atheist who just published a book. I glanced through it to see what he did for a living. He teaches world religion at the local community college. 

When we lived in Glendale, Arizona, that was a requirement for teaching in the religion department. If they found out someone was a believer, he could not even be a part-time teacher there. Thus one requirement filtered out all Christians from the department, so every believing student had to live with the consequences of that requirement. To be an atheist was not written up, just understood. When I mentioned that at another school, a GCC student agreed, "We all knew that we had to fake atheism to get a decent grade in world religion."

One of my friends told me, "You are perhaps the only Christian teaching world religion - the only one in America." That is what one assumption can do to an academic topic - no believers need apply. The same type of assumption works in synodical machinery, where mediocrities protect their job security by constant vigilance and diligent wet work.


Be sure to study Walther's Pastoral Theology,
to learn more.

I hear from a lot of people. Necessarily, I do not reproduce their communications but use them as background. I use my own experiences to show people that abusive behavior is common in the Synodical Conference. The worst experiences of others are not shared, because they point to the source or bring up painful memories. 

Even so, I have seen people react as if the invisible foot of the synod were on their necks. And of course, it is.

The Synodical Conference throws away faithful church workers as if they were the weekly trash.  Here is one link:

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2008/09/rev-bruce-becker-church-and-change-wels.html

Another link - this has the list I promised before (proofread!):

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2009/03/mouse-in-doubt.html

I will provide another one later today:

I remember when Bruce Becker was doing wet work for WELS, a euphonious job description. The name Bruce Becker meant little, but I know he tried to force the late Howard Festerling into denying the efficacy of the Word. Later, when Becker was losing his job at the Love Shack, Mark and Avoid Jeske hired him. Later Becker seemed had a job offer at Wisconsin Lutheran College, a Church Growth union shop.




Becker was on the board of Church and Change when he was head of Perish Services for WELS. Even DP Jon-Boy Buchholz, a synodical lapdog, had to admit that Perish Services did a lot of damage everywhere.

Anyone in the Ohio Conference who questioned David Valleskey's ideology was pushed out of WELS, including three pastors in Toledo. 

A significant part of this work is managing information, even with the advent of the wide open Internet and an "independent" tabloid newspaper. As Papa Joe Kennedy told his errant son Jack, "It doesn't matter what you are, only what they think you are." Thus the promiscuous father of a promiscuous son advised the future president that media management was everything.

Several people involved with Steadfast Lutherans were aware of the LCMS support of Darwin Schauer in getting a lay-pastor job, even though he was a convicted child sex offender (not unlike Joel Hochmuth, who had also been caught before). The LCMS ordered the blog to remove all discussion of the case, so they erased it. That is why I preserved the essentials early on Ichabod. People can use the Wayback tool, to find erased posts, but very few people do.




Myth-Making
Massaging the facts until they become lies is the heart of every bureaucracy. 

CFW Walther is an excellent example of this treatment, since Ferdy created the bureaucracy that still protects his image. Here are some basic facts about Walther, which have been covered up, denied, or massaged:


  • Walther's voluntary associations were exclusively with Pietists, first in college, then as a pastor. His circle was a tightly-knit group of Pietists, who moved from the first dictatorial guru to another one, Martin Stephan (known for his cell group Pietism).
  • One man married the fiance of the first guru, after that leader died. Ludwig Fuerbringer's father married the widow of CFW's brother. Ludwig became the Concordia St. Louis president. They were closely knit from cell groups - and inter-married as well. Walther wanted no early history of the LCMS written.
  • Walther served as the enforcer for Martin Stephan, making sure that everyone obeyed Stephan or face excommunication.
  • Stephan organized the exodus to America, which was headline news in Europe. His desire to leave grew with his adultery and financial scandals.
  • Stephan's adultery was no secret to the clergy or the lay leaders, who all knew about the evening walks, the young groupies, and police investigations, the courtroom drama, and the syphilis.
  • Stephan shared his syphilis with his long-suffering wife and his many children. His trips to the spa with his mistress were for treatment of syphilis. His bizarre behavior later in America was caused by late stage syphilis, which attacks the brain.
  • Walther pledged obedience to bishop-for-life Stephan but organized the mob to expel Stephan a few months later.
  • The so-called discovery of Stephan's adultery through a woman's confession was a lie, since it was always known by the clergy. The young woman was Stephan's lover before the trip, during the voyage, after the voyage, and after the expulsion. They lived together in the Illinois cabin - like Karl Barth and Charlotte Kirschbaum - the very first Love Shack.
  • Walther followed none of the Biblical rules for disciplining adultery, when it was "discovered." The sudden crisis was an outbreak of syphilis among the young women of the group, which provided an opportunity for the clergy to overthrow the bishop before they all wore rope neckties.
  • The Walther mob threatened the life of their bishop, robbed him of all his gold, books, land, personal possessions, and forced him at gunpoint to cross the Mississippi River. They dumped him at a shack with a couple of tools and a few dollars.
  • Walther thought Stephan was a bit of a Pietist. That is like saying Walther was a bit of a liar.
  • Walther blamed Stephan's adultery on Mrs. Stephan, who bore and tended his tainted children, many of them dying in an institution. She died young too, abandoned in Dresden by Stephan, Walther, and those loving founders of the LCMS.
  • About 99% of this is known from Zion on the Mississippi, additional accounts from that time, and court records.
  • A few more details have come from the recent book and website created by the Stephan family. Naturally, the myth-makers have gone to town on that source!



Thursday, January 10, 2013

VirtueOnline - News

VirtueOnline - News:

Washington National Cathedral to Celebrate Same-Sex Weddings

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org 
January 8, 2013

The Washington National Cathedral, the nation's iconic center for funerals and presidential gatherings, will now allow same-sex weddings to be celebrated in the cathedral.

Dean Gary Hall said the cathedral has a long history of advancing equality for people of all faiths and perspectives. "The Cathedral is called to serve as a gathering place for the nation in times of significance, but it is also rooted in its role as the most visible faith community within the Episcopal Church."

The Episcopal Church has, for more than 30 years, raged backwards and forwards over the issue of pansexuality. Last summer at its General Convention, it approved rites for same sex blessings.

In a news release, Hall said it is now only fitting that the National Cathedral follow suit. "We enthusiastically affirm each person as a beloved child of God-and doing so means including the full participation of gays and lesbians in the life of this spiritual home for the nation."

Hall said his decision was consistent with the canons of the Episcopal Church. "The Cathedral will begin celebrating same-sex marriage ceremonies using a rite adapted from an existing blessing ceremony approved in August 2012 by the Church at its General Convention. That approval allowed for the bishops who oversee each diocese within the Church to decide whether or not to allow the rite's use or to allow celebration of same-sex marriage."

Celebrating same-sex weddings is important beyond the Episcopal Church, Hall said. Church debate is largely settled on the matter, allowing for local decisions, he added. The move is also a chance to influence the nation, Hall told the Associated Press.

In light of the legality of civil marriage for same-sex couples in the District of Columbia and Maryland, Washington Bishop Mariann Budde announced last month that the diocese would allow this expansion of the sacrament, which she said led to her decision for the Cathedral's adaptation of the same-sex rite.

Bishop Budde


Budde said she was inspired by the witness she had seen of gay and lesbian communities where she has served for over 35 years of ordained ministry. "I am pleased that this step follows the results made clear in this past November's election, when three states voted to allow same-sex marriage.

"Matters of human sexual identity and questions about the Church's role in blessing lifelong, committed relationships between its members are serious issues around which feelings run high and people of good will can often disagree. It is my hope and prayer that, if all of us open ourselves to the fullness and diversity of our nation's many voices, we will learn to walk together in a new way as we listen for God's call to us to be faithful to each other and to God."

Same-sex marriage is now legal in nine states and the District of Columbia. Legislators in Illinois and Rhode Island are set to take up bills to possibly join them. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear cases on gay marriage in March.

The first same-sex wedding performed last month at West Point's Cadet Chapel drew some protests from conservatives. The National Cathedral is even more visible.

In a move that will surely raise eyebrows among conservative Episcopalians, All Saints Chapel at Sewanee, the University of the South, a five-story Gothic church at the center of the college campus, will formally allow the blessing of same-sex couples, embracing the decision of General Convention last summer which approved controversial Rites for homosexuals and lesbians.

The controversy has placed Sewanee in a tricky position, said John McCardell Jr., Sewanee's vice chancellor and president. "An absolute yes or an absolute no was just not possible," McCardell noted. The college feared its chapel could become a sort of Las Vegas for blessings of gay unions -- an end-run for couples whose bishops won't permit the rite in their own diocese.

The compromise: Gay and lesbian couples who meet the other eligibility requirements for a Sewanee wedding will be able to have their union blessed in the college chapel, as long as their bishops are supportive.

McCardell described the decision, reached by the college chaplain, dean of the School of Theology, and the two bishops on the Board of Regents, which oversees university governance, as "the only sensible thing."

In 2003, The Russian Orthodox Church destroyed a chapel after local churchmen declared it defiled because it hosted a "marriage" ceremony for two men. The Rev. Vladimir Enert was defrocked for conducting the service for Denis Gogolyev and Mikhail Morozev at the Chapel of the Vladimir Icon of the Mother of God in the city of Nizhny Novgorod, 280 miles east of Moscow, the London Telegraph reported. A spokesman for the Orthodox Church indicated the chapel had to be demolished because it was desecrated.

However, independent reports show gay marriages are fragile at best. The vast majority of homosexuals, (even those who see themselves as "loving"), are NOT interested in marriage. Those few who ARE interested in committed relationships have the opportunity to engage in such relationships. This kind of commitment does not necessitate marriage. Furthermore there is no biblical support for such "marriages." Any sexual act outside of marriage between a man and a woman is biblically proscribed and will ultimately bring the judgment of God. The Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches have roundly rejected such marital options.

The deeper truth is homosexual activists aren't concerned with rights; they are concerned with complete societal endorsement of their behavior. Homosexuals want the society to stop telling them that what they are doing is "wrong" so they can feel better about what they are doing.

END

'via Blog this'

***

GJ - We attended an organ concert there. The building is spectacular, but when people sang, it was barely a whisper.

Obituary For: Rev. Howard H. Festerling | Gephart Funeral Home

Rev. Howard H. Festerling
Howard Festerling was a fine pastor, a wonderful person to know, full of humor and good stories.
Most importantly, he was faithful to the Word of God
when leaders were faithless and hostile to it.

Obituary For: Rev. Howard H. Festerling | Gephart Funeral Home:

Rev. Howard H. Festerling, 70, of Midland, MI was welcomed to his eternal home on January 8, 2013. We rejoice that he is now with his Savior in Heaven. The son of Lester and Esther Festerling, Howard was born in Bay County on July 7, 1942. He attended St. John’s Ev. Lutheran School and Handy HS (’60), followed by Northwestern Lutheran College (’65). On December 26, 1965, he married the love of his life, Judith Haverkate, in Lake Mills, WI. In 1967 Howard and Judi took the first of many adventures in their 47-year marriage.

Howard became a teacher and headmaster at a Lutheran Chinese middle school in Hong Kong, where they were blessed to have three daughters. In 1975, the family returned to the U.S. so Howard could attend Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary. As a minister, Pastor Festerling served the Lord at missions in Jakarta, Indonesia, Toledo, OH, Vancouver, BC, and Cadillac and Fenton, MI. Howard also had a passion for architecture and design, which he put to use managing the construction of two churches, building two homes by hand (with the tireless help of Judi), and designing kitchens for Design Classics in Toledo, OH as well as Home Depot in Midland. He will be remembered for his conviction in God’s word, his ability to speak to anyone, his love of words and language, and his quick wit.

Howard is survived by his wife, Judi K. Festerling, daughters, Lori (Matthew) Gries of Atlanta, GA; Jennifer (Jamison) Diehl of Toledo, OH; and Kimberly (Craig) Schuette of Midland and six grandchildren: Benjamin, Sarah & Luke Gries, John Henry Diehl, and Kaylee & Wyatt Schuette. Also surviving are siblings Robert (Paula), Linda (Jim Philip), Lois (Tom Tackebury), Roger (Mimi) and John (Julie). He is predeceased by a daughter, Hope (1987). The funeral service will be held at 11 am on Saturday, Jan. 12 at St. John’s Ev. Lutheran Church in Bay City. Officiating will be Rev. John Seifert and Rev. Carl Otto.

The family will receive friends at the Gephart Funeral Home on Thursday, Jan. 10 from 6-8 pm, and on Friday, Jan. 11 from 2-4 and 6-9 pm, and from 10 am until the time of service at 11 am. A luncheon will be served in the church hall following internment at Oakridge Cemetery. In lieu of flowers, the family asks that donations be made to the Pardee Cancer Treatment Fund of Midland.


'via Blog this'

Lutheran Pastors Want To Be Priests Now - And Called Father - No Change from Luther on the Priesthood


Luther's Epiphany Sermon

186. In the twelfth place, they are unchaste. How could it be otherwise when they are leading such a haughty, free, secure, indolent, gay and wanton life? How is it possible that they should remain chaste, addicted to all the aforesaid vices, when those scarcely succeed who live an irreproachable, virtuous life? Now, this vice is publicly known to exist among them, they indulge in it immeasurably and yet go unpunished. But no one is responsible for this unchastity but the pope, because he has forbidden the clergy to marry. If they were allowed to marry, many would abstain from the vices, but many of them would be obliged to choose a different calling. The evil spirit knew this well, and in order that such vice may be strengthened, he prompted the pope to forbid marriage. Thus has originated this peculiar institution, which is pleasing unto themselves. And lastly, he has beguiled them with this pretense, that they do not acknowledge, never regret, nor repent of, the eleven vices previously described, but regard them as right and virtuous, and enter heaven with them. But this twelfth vice is so coarse that they can not deny it. Here they do penance and confess it and thereby become as white again as snow, just as a sow that lies in the mud with its entire body. but keeps only one ear and a few bristles on its back clean.

187. In the thirteenth place, they are fierce; that is, they are entirely untried, untrained, inexperienced people, who cannot understand any shame; when you touch them they loose their temper, and this must all follow from their unrestrained life in which they have been reared. As a child that has been left to do as it pleased becomes coarse and knotty, so they also are inflexible, ungentle, intolerable people. They are accustomed to be honored, to receive plenty, to have their will and to go unpunished; if anything else, therefore, comes in their way, they will not tolerate it. But if they were under discipline as others, they would oftentimes have to give way and abstain from that which they now freely do and would no doubt become more mellow and mild, so that one could get along better with them. This vice is also a very open one, especially in the monasteries, where they call themselves pas-donates; that is, such that easily become angry.

188. In the fourteenth place, they are no lovers of good; that is, they do not regard the good, they are entirely unconcerned about performing good works and proceed as though they were not in need of good works and as if they knew another and better way to heaven. For they maintain that they are so superabundantly rich in good works, through holding mass and praying their horas that they can even sell them to others. They simply know of no other good works than their own self-imposed and self-chosen works, concerning which God has commanded nothing. Those who are the most pious make their testament when they die, institute masses and vigils, increase the fees of the officiating clergy and improve the possessions and the worship of the holy church. These are their good works; besides this their whole life is of no good and no benefit to anyone. Or would you call that a good work when they extort money from the poor people, as the Jews did, practice usury in all the lands and levy taxes on every house and head? Do not believe that they would ever give without returns, or loan without interest; on the contrary, they must gather for their wills and soulmasses.

Therefore it has become proverbial that a priest’s testament is a sausage, remains a sausage, and will be a sausage. Therefore the will passes through and through the testators from one to the other; that the property is not worthy to be of any benefit to the poor people. Thus also other good works, such as visiting the sick, clothing the naked, comforting the downcast and the like; being of service and benefit to neighbors, is with them neither a matter of concern nor an act of worship. They abide by their masses and church — howling and make of the mass a good work and offering. This costs them neither trouble nor money, but brings money and secures indolent and good days.

Clergy As Devils - From Luther's Epiphany Sermon


Luther's Epiphany Sermon


184. Thirdly, when, however, they wish to reprove or accuse another, they deal as unmercifully with him as though they themselves were in need of no grace, and as though they themselves had never committed any sin. They do not tell his superior but revile him publicly before those who knew nothing of it before. Here the love of justice is bought for a high price, for thereby the neighbor is robbed of his honor and disgraced. Here it concerns them not when he is driven into despair, hazards his body and soul, becomes a desperate man. They have reproved the sin as pious, honorable people, but as to betterment, let another see to that. They cast him from them as one who would always remain a good-for-nothing. Oh, what a senseless mass of holy, honorable people they are; they have no scruples of conscience, they go and pray as though they had done their part well!

Behold! to this vice they add the ones spoken of previously; they are boastful lovers of self and also without natural affection, obstinate, who concern themselves about no one, are of service to no one and seek only their own honor to the shame and detriment of others. For this reason St.

Paul her calls them diabolus, slanderers, defilers, who know no other way of dealing with their neighbor’s sins than thereby to disgrace him, to rob him publicly of his good name that they only may be looked upon as pious, well bred and honored men: For if they were merciful and kind-hearted, they would seek to better and not to defame or cast away any one but destroy his sin.

185. St. Paul has indeed described them perfectly; for experience teaches how insanely the clergy and men of this kind are bent upon listening to other people’s sins and shame, ridiculing, speaking about and spreading them, that they indeed are worthy of the name diaboli or devils. St. Paul always uses this little word diabolus in this sense; although some people use it for the devil, whose nature also is to expose, spread and magnify people’s sins. But when St. Paul speaks of the devil he usually says Satan.

Thus he says, 1 Timothy 3:6: “A bishop must not be a novice, lest being puffed up he fall into the condemnation of the diabolus,” that is, the slanderer, that he may not have occasion to judge evil of him etc.

Luther Is Up To Date about Abusive Clergy


Epiphany Sermon

182. Compare with this what these lovers of discipline and honor now do.

In the first place, because they secretly think so much of themselves and are so well pleased with themselves, they think that no one acts and thinks as well as they do, they are the most suspicious people on earth, full of unnecessary care and anxiety that no one does right, and they put the worst construction upon everything; and even when a deed is good, they nevertheless think the intention is evil. Then they search for and meditate closely upon the intention that a person may possibly have and are not satisfied until they have heard something bad about their neighbor. Oh! what respectable and honorable people are addicted to this vice; and it really seems at times as though it were only cautiousness with them and fear of being deceived. But cautiousness considers casual danger and protects itself from being degraded, speaks openly: I believe that you have no bad intentions, but we are all human, you may change and err as well as I, etc. But suspicion considers the present deed only, thinking nothing good of it, and not of the casual danger; it thinks that that is already wrong which caution regards as good and for which it provides means to save it from becoming bad.

183. Secondly, when suspicion sees the neighbor’s evil deed secretly or hears of it, it is delighted, for it can now show how pious it is and how bad other people are, how it loves righteousness, propriety and honor. The poor publican must submit to the Pharisee; Noah must suffer to have his son Ham see his nakedness. Yea, we are accustomed to say, what an honorable, pious man this is; every one must now hear of this neighbor’s evil deed. Some take great pleasure in hearing and talking about the sins of others and say: Indeed it is true. This vice has assumed greater proportions than any one believes, especially among those who seem to be honorable and well bred people. Here there is no one who would conceal, who would reprove, who would amend, who would intercede; but everyone slanders and defames and yet they are holy and spiritual people.

Find This Sentence - More Propaganda from Concordia Publishing House

http://cyberbrethren.com/2013/01/10/commemoration-of-the-cappadocian-fathers/#more-4863


The quote:
The best evidence of their value and power lies in the fact that for fourteen centuries they have been a mine whence the greatest theologians of Christendom have drawn treasures of wisdom to illustrate and support their own teaching on the deepest mysteries of the Catholic Faith.

Evidence -

Most of the quotation is found here -

and the old standby - The Catholic Encyclopedia - which is actually cited at the beginning!


Another article is from Aquinas and More. Catholic Goods.



Obviously, the Concordia Publishing House editor could no longer get away with "source" and "HT" at the bottom. This only shows that, apart from extreme laziness, his main goal is to promote Roman Catholicism.

Perhaps we are considered stupid enough to be thrown off by posts about Luther and Sasse on the same day. That only makes it worse, to blend those two stalwarts with papal propaganda.

No Call Paul used to promote his blog almost daily on LutherQuest, including his plagiarized posts from The Catholic Encyclopedia. That changed after the dishonesty and papalism were exposed.

Otten and McCain are not talking to each, just like the old days, when Barry was running for SP (insert ironic wink icon). But they operate the same way, which I expect from UOJ fanatics. They pose as Lutherans but promote Roman Catholicism when it suits them. When caught at it, they double-time back to some Lutheran icons, the equivalent of promising the arresting officer to give up the bottle for good.

A sincere Lutheran is not going to promote Roman Catholicism at any time.

Yet Ken Howes is outraged that I wrote the truth about CFW Walther:

What Happened to Jackson? Trashing Walther and the LCMS
“He really trashes Walther and the LCMS” writes Kenneth Howes in response to a review by Gregory Jackson (S.T.M. Yale, Ph.D. Notre Dame) to his translation of C.F.W. Walther’s (B.A.) “The Formula of Concord, Core and Highlights –The Doctrine of Election in Questions and Answers” published by Lutheran News....Christian News, 1-14-13


I answered - "I read the histories. It's all there in Zion on the Mississippi and the Stephan book. Most of it is in Zion. Telling truth is not trashing. Telling lies about the Great Kidnapper is a sin."
Not that Otten promoted lies about Luther, selling the Roman Catholic hate-fest called The Facts about Luther - for Reformation!



UOJ and the Problem of Ignorance.
Note Luther's Description of the Scriptures,
The Parallel to the Incarnation



LPC has left a new comment on your post "Trust But Verify":

I assume complete ignorance on his part

This is always a safe assumption when dealing with the Rev. McCain.

I can never emphasize enough the ignorance of the said pastor, if you know what I mean. We are never wrong when we assume him to be ignorant, Dr. Greg, even though he has an MDiv.

LPC


***

GJ - Paul McCain and his court jester, Jack Kilcrease, share one attribute besides their addiction to UOJ. They are hopelessly inadequate in the English language.

McCain tries to cover this by copying the work of others, making it appear to be his own. How this qualifies him as an editor at CPH is beyond my comprehension.

Kilcrease adopts an air of superiority, but that only makes his squawking more amusing. He tries to adopt the air of a mother who pitieth her silly children, but that does not work well with people who can read and discern the Word. All the philosophy in the world will not stand up to one Word from the Scriptures.

The post below became the most popular in two years and gains about 2,000 page-views per month.


15,113 page-reads.