Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Infamous Huberists:
From the New Gallery at The Smoking Gun

Pope John the Malefactor
Easter absolution sermon:
plagiarized from Huber.


AC V has left a new comment on your post "Since We Have So Few Lutherans Left, Let Us Celebr...":

More on Huber and UOJ terminology:

"Learned men are at this day agreed that Huber swerved from the Lutheran doctrines, in words rather than meaning; for what the Lutherans maintain respecting the love of God as embracing the whole human race, and excluding no one absolutely from eternal salvation, this he would explain in a new manner and in new phraseology. But this age having learned from numerous examples, that new phraseology and new modes of explaining doctrines produced as lasting and as pernicious disturbance as new errors, urged Huber to adopt the old and universal method of teaching, in preference to his own. And when he declared that he could not do so, and his patrons here and there threatened to produce disturbance, he was compelled to relinquish his office, and go into exile." - Murdock's Mosheim, Cen. xvi. sec. iii. Part ii. chap. L

The modern history of Universalism, from the era of the Reformation to the present time (Volume v.1) (page 21 of 36)

http://www.ebooksread.com/authors-eng/thomas-whittemore/the-modern-history-of-universalism-from-the-era-of-the-reformation-to-the-prese-tih/page-21-the-modern-history-of-universalism-from-the-era-of-the-reformation-to-the-prese-tih.shtml

Jack Kilcrease, Roman Catholic college instructor.

Jack Cascione, President of the Jack Cascione Synod.

Tim Glende, Tyrant.

Jay Webber, Huber Professor of Universal Forgiveness,
Little Sect on the Prairie.

Stevie Kurtzahn, tireless opponent
of Shrove Tuesday pancakes.


Gurgle and Ski, who help me
spell-check this blog.

Richard Jungkuntz, godfather of radicalism, Seminex,
the first Lutheran seminary to train homosexual and lesbian candidates.
Paul McCain, salesman for the
Calvinist ESV.


Walther Conference Cancelled at Our Lady of Sorrows, St. Louis.
Isn't the Cancellation Automatic Now?



bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Quote of the Day: Luther and Paul":

The Walther Conference at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, has been cancelled, the second time this has occurred. It was cancelled after Herman Otten sent an outline of his speech to the synod hierarchy detailing what he thought Walther would have done if he were in leadership today. It was too much for them to bear, apparently.

Several years ago, SP Kieschnick had the Walther conference cancelled at St. Louis seminary specifically because many of the participants and attendees had sued the LCMS and Kieschnick over his election fraud. This occurred despite the out-of-court settlement that Kieschnick signed saying he would not retaliate against the whistle blowers. Then subsequently he violated the agreement again when he approved 114 or so delegate exceptions mostly from the liberal east coast portion of the LCMS, thereby securing his re-election, just as he had done three years before, the very action that brought on the lawsuit. After Kieschnick got away with that scot-free both times, the lawyer Doggert, or whatever his name was, resigned from the Lutheran Foundation, since Kieschnick showed he could act with impunity despite any legal process mounted against him:

Walther 2011 Conference Canceled:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/reclaimnews/message/255

http://christiannewsmo.blogspot.com/2011/10/walther-200-years-after-his-birth-what.html

***

GJ - Sure, Paul McCain was going to let Cascione and Otten occupy Our Lady of Sorrows Seminary in Clayton and get the Bronzies all pumped up. That will happen right after  McCain outgrows his gun fetish.

I remember Bishop Sauer dealing with a group of German ethnic pastors. The "interest group" - as it was called - was entitled to meet and have their officers. They arranged a meeting when Ken Sauer was the LCA bishop in Ohio. He said he could not find the meeting place. That is even better than "I forgot" or Doug Englebrecht ducking a meeting and leaving a letter. How can someone say, "But you did know how to get there."

The Germans were pretty upset and mailed out a letter about it. Perhaps five people read it.

One reader was correct. Almost no one cares about Walther. The vast majority will never read anything about him, so the mythological lies will continue. His methods of grabbing power and bullying others will continue to be emulated by his descendants.

Three people kidnapped, mob rule, massive theft, land fraud -
let's build a shrine to our hero.

The Walther shrine, complete with BVM Walther statue.
Buy mini-statues from Christian News.

Quote of the Day:
Luther and Paul



AC V has left a new comment on your post "Two Birthdays To Note: Martin Luther and Martin Ch...":

Quote of the day:

Martin Luther held that it was "not at all in conformity with the New Testament to write books about Christian doctrine." He noted that before the Apostles wrote books, they "previously preached to and converted the people with the physical voice, which was also their real apostolic and New Testament work."[4] To Luther, it was necessary to write books to counter all the false teachers and errors of the present day, but writing books on Christian teaching came at a price. "But since it became necessary to write books, there is already a great loss, and there is uncertainty as to what is meant."[5] Martin Luther taught preaching and lectured upon the books of the Bible in an exegetical manner. To Luther, St. Paul was the greatest of all systematic theologians, and his Epistle to the Romans was the greatest dogmatics textbook of all time.[1]

from Wikipedia: "Lutheran scholasticism"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lutheran_scholasticism 

Grace In Action CrossTrain Coaching.
Don Patterson and Jeff Gunn Using WELS To Make Profits, Not Prophets

Grace In Action CrossTrain Coaching:

'via Blog this'


CrossTrain Ministries Coaching Network Conference
October 5th - 8th
Daytona Beach, FL
(Fly into Orlando International MCO)

Effective Strategies for Developing Leaders in Your Ministry
(Pastor Don Patterson)

  • Positive communications explaining what you do and why you do it
  • Enlist their services to enjoy opportunities to handle the Word
  • Give them opportunities to see the Word work.
  • Develop strong relationships that allow you to know individual's strengths and weaknesses and apply God's Word to both
  • Integrate the Word as part of every interaction with them.
  • Value the relationship with your leaders by being grace filled and forgiving
  • Live your expectations of others by being a servant
  • Live in the shadow of the cross instead of our success and failures



    Small Group Leadership
    (Pastor Jeff Gunn)

    The means of grace are the key to people growing in their faith. One way to deliver the means of grace to the people of our congregation is via a groups system. "Growth groups" are gatherings of 12-15 people in homes of the congregation for the purpose of sharing the word of God with one another, praying and worshipping with one another, enjoying fellowship, serving in the congregation and community, and reaching out with the gospel.

    PS - Don't forget the rice, Jeff.
    ---


    LutherRocks has left a new comment on your post "Grace In Action CrossTrain Coaching. Don Patterson...":

    The cost of ministry is rising...1200$ per year last May...up 100$ in October. Better sign up while you can! 

Two Birthdays To Note:
Martin Luther and Martin Chemnitz



raklatt (http://raklatt.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Walther's 200th Birthday - October 25, 2011: Mytho...":

We Lutherans look forward to celebrating two birthdays a few days into November. The 9th and the 10th.

Martin Chemnitz and Martin Luther.




Since We Have So Few Lutherans Left,
Let Us Celebrate Huberism



LPC has left a new comment on your post "Digging Up an Obscure Theologian: AC V Has a Busy ...":

It is interesting that Huber used to be Reformed. He was in utter wacko mind when he thought that justification was the same as the atonement. This indeed is the paradigm of Calvinism.

Based on that quote that Dr. Greg provided, clearly Huber was a UOJer.

He was also greatly mistaken to believe that a person who claims only believers are saved is a Calvinist. He missed JBFA. Since he missed JBFA he could not then detect universalism in himself. One is a corollary to the other.

LPC

---

AC V has left a new comment on your post "Delicious Quotation from Hardt: UOJ and Huberism":

Huberanism:

http://www.studiumexcitare.com/content/6 

---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Huber and Walther":

Bruce,

Plagiarize is the word. Thanks for that.

The way he did it was clever, he denounced Huber but at the same time adopted Huber's paradigm. Neat.

The side effect of this? Well he sounded original or insightful and even orthodox.

If a person can be dishonest in his relationship with people (kidnapping etc), does this not trickle down to being dishonest in theology?

Look at Issues Etc., they have now featured Walther's life twice and probably more to come. What is more is that they do it with much adoration.


LPC

---
LPC has left a new comment on your post "Calov, Gerhard, and Quenstedt: Are These Men Addre...":

Agree that UOJ is Huberism as well as Waltherianism.

LPC

---

GreyGoose:


The Huber posts are very interesting.  To understand that the controversy was heated in Chemnitz' time could indicate that the Zwingli/Calvin influence remained in sway with a certain ambivalence and continued at one level or another until the Knapp/Woods definitions tended to solidified things. 
All of the UOJ arguments are of the "well, but..." trait.  Even the Walther quotes are as two-sided as Huber's.
A fascinating look at the historical progressions. 

---

AC V has left a new comment on your post "Who Is Polycarp Leyser? The Founder of a Dynasty o...":

References to the Huber controversy:

He was opposed by Polycarp Lyser and  Hunnius (1593), whom he in his turn charged with Calvinism. For the particulars of the controversy, and the explanations of Huber, see Schröckh, iv. p. 601, and Andr. Schmidii Dissert, de Sam. Hnberi Vita, Fatis et Doctrina, Heimst., 1708, 4. Jul. Niggers, Beiträge zur Lcbensgesch Sam. Hubens, in Illgen's Zeitschrift, 1844. Trechsel, in the Berner Taschenbuch, 1844. Schweizer, Centraidogmen, i. 501 sq.

http://books.google.com/books?pg=PA279&lpg=PA277&dq=Dr.%20Samuel%20Huber%20Lutheran%20theologian%20universalism&sig=r64RhJR00M-X2owTQbWbAQKHayk&ei=yh2oTqOAO4OLsQKIk4jADw&ct=result&id=24QXAAAAYAAJ&ots=2AYNdMwoLj&output=text  


GJ - Someone wondered what happened to Huberism after he was repudiated. The Calvinists began to gain among the Lutherans again. Not long after, Spener took advantage of the Arndt book to publish his new program of unionism, doctrinal indifference, and cell groups - Pious Wishes - the beginning of Pietism.

A recent book by NPH noted that Calvinism is no longer crypto among the Lutherans.

---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Since We Have So Few Lutherans Left, Let Us Celebr...":

One can see why Walther liked the BoC so much. All his errors came to the scene after the BoC was written, and thus they were not proscribed by the BoC. Meanwhile, Walther could charge that his opponents' beliefs violated the BoC.

Walther's 200th Birthday - October 25, 2011:
Mythological Origins of the LCMS.
WELS, ELS, LCMS Filled with Huberism and Enthusiasm


The LCMS continues to promote a mythological view of C. F. W. Walther. Contrary information has been stored at the Concordia Historical Institute, where Paul McCain once sought refuge, but no one wants to admit the truth.

When Walther was born in 1811, Germany was divided between Pietists and rationalists. Orthodox Lutherans were scarcer than hen's teeth. Walther's education was rationalistic but he fell in with a group of extreme Pietists. He was starving himself to death when he found comfort in the less strict cell group circles of Martin Stephan. His new leader was trained in Halle Pietism and took great pride in the success of his cell group congregation in Dresden. Walther gave Stephan credit for saving his life.

When hagiographers write about Walther's health, readers should remember that their hero was emotionally disturbed and starving himself to death with acts of contrition. Doubtless he read plenty of Luther when sick, but that did not make Walther a Lutheran.

Stephan, like many cell group leaders, had profound hold on many of his followers. Although it is true that he had religious opponents, Stephan also made enemies with his early dalliances with various women. Like many cell group or Church Growth leaders, Stephan imagined he had a right to have sex with the women and girls in his congregation.

Unfortunately for his long-suffering wife, Stephan contracted syphilis from his adulteries. This fact is also known among insiders although it might have escaped the notice of his closest followers at the time. Syphillis begins with a sore but may seem to go away without treatment. Various symptoms may appear from time to time, but the ignorant sufferer may think, "I was only imagining that I had the French disease. I have to stop worrying so much." During this stage Stephan passed the disease to his wife. The son was healthy, but three of their daughters were deaf and sickly, symptoms of the congenital syphilis. Stephan and his wife were also plagued with various symptoms.

Stephan had rashes, a sign of syphilis, and his #1 mistress, Louise, lived with him at the spa when he was being treated. Stephan's wife visited the spa to help, but she was sent home. Stephan also installed a young woman in his attic, never explaining why. His wife kicked the girl out and locked the attic. Stephan had the lock broken and brought the girl back. He insisted he was "master of the house." Bullying adulterers and their passive wives are a common feature of the Church Growth Movement today.

Stephan's behavior led to police investigations and various accusations of improprieties with women. He was famous for late-night walks with women. Stephan was under house arrest just before he was allowed to leave for America. His wife gave clear testimony about the extent of his adultery, so the mythologists of today can hardly claim ignorance.

Therefore, the claim that the Stephanites "suddenly" found out about his adultery proves how anxious Walther and his descendants were to hide their prior knowledge of the randy bishop's immorality. Multiple appearances of syphilis among the women in America may have spread panic among the pastors, who knew they would soon be ridiculed again in the newspapers - this time for following a syphilitic impostor.

The Walther gang faced the possibility that they would be arrested with Bishop Stephan, or strung up for bringing a diseased phony to America as their bishop. Those fears explain the frantic and secretive stealing of the bishop's land (given to him by the society) and the mob action. Walther and his mob descended like a pack of wolves on the fold. Walther already prepped his future in-laws and others in Perryville about the bishop, but avoided Stephan.

The Truth about Walther's Mob Action 
Walther had no qualms about breaking the law. He and his brother kidnapped their niece and nephew from their father's parsonage, bringing them to America, where the children died. The police issued arrest warrants for Walther, which is why he left Europe on a different ship. His ship sank in a storm, leading the hagiographers to rejoice that God spared the life of their hero, whose personality and doctrine left an indelible (bad) impression on the LCMS.

Walther led the mob of 300 from St. Louis to Perryville on May 29th. He left the bishop's supporters at home. According to Stephan himself:
  • Pastors Loeber and Keyl told Stephan he was no longer bishop. Stephan was denied food from that time on.
  • Vehse and Marbach, attorneys who helped Walther kidnap the children, helped lead the mob.
  • Vehse forced Stephan to undress, so they could look for more money to steal from him.
  • Two men guarded Stephan - forcible detention. The mob surrounded the house, lit fires, and hit the house with whips. In effect, they threatened the life of Stephan and forced him to surrender all his personal possessions, money, and books, leaving him bankrupt. All this happened without a trial or even a hearing.
  • The mob stole 4000 gold coins.
  • They also took 1500 books, a valuable library even today, but far more precious in the days of the letter-press.
  • They stole his clothing and bedding.
  • Contrary to the lies being spread today in Perry County by Walther's idolaters, Stephan was not given a choice over the courts, a return to Europe, or exile in Illinois. He was taken at gunpoint on a steamer the next day, with nothing left. This was the third kidnapping arranged by Walther, yet the Purple Palace historians hail him as the American Luther.
  • The felons dumped Stephan in a ramshackle hut with a spade and an axe to "earn his living."
  • Not content with what they had already done, the Society spread stories about Stephan, such as his conversion to Roman Catholicism. They accused him of being an embezzler, although he had no access to the funds.
  • Louis Guenther, his #1 mistress, came over to help Stephan and live with him. She had previously lived with him at the spa. Stephan was quite ill at this point, doubtless a response to his stress and exposure, being forced to camp on the ground the night he was driven out of his house.
  • Walther fraudulently tricked Stephan's son into giving up the title to the 80 acres that the bishop bought with his own money. The son had no right to change ownership and later felt used and abused by Walther. Nevertheless, the Stephan family has had a long and impressive history in the LCMS. One was a speaker for the Lutheran Hour.
  • Stephan eventually took his case to court and won back a token amount from the Society. The mob kept two valuable chalices they stole from him, which are still a point of contention. One was used for Holy Communion at Walther's church in St. Louis. Ain't that sweet?


I have no use for adulterous pastors. Their marital infidelity is but a clue of their unfaithfulness to the Word of God. Stephan was a disease-ridden false teacher, but Walther's gang were his enablers. They participated in his Pietism, his blend of Lutheran and Calvinistic doctrine. They ignored Stephan's numerous and obvious examples of immorality. They were like many city folks who came to America and found the wilderness to be far less than they imagined.

The Saxon Immigration Society reminds me of the Columbus WELS pastors, who knowingly followed a man kicked out of the LCMS ministerium and sued by the husband of one mistress. All their subsequent troubles can be traced to their willingness to spread false doctrine while overlooking the obvious. Unwilling to let WELS enjoy all the toxins and pathogens, the Little Sect on the Prairie adopted the same adulterer and worked with him through Thoughts of Faith (sic). Impressario Jay Webber, a true Waltherian, said he was helpless to do anything about it.

Walther's methods have created the template for Synodical Conference behavior. He had to be top dog. Any deception was fine, as long as it advanced his personal cause. Anyone who differed with Walther was driven away. All the Lutheran groups were supposed to bow to Walther. If they wavered, he denounced them as false teachers.

In Pursuit of Religious Freedom is essential reading to get behind the lies told by Paul McCain, Steadfast Lutherans (sic), SP Harrison, Christian News, and the rest.

The Stephan website is also worth studying.

Yes, we know Stephan was really a cad, but nothing justifies the behavior of the Walther mob.

The Stephan website is managed by a lesbian descendant of Stephan, but that does not change the facts. McCain's knee-jerk personal attacks are right from the Walther playbook.



---

rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Walther's 200th Birthday - October 25, 2011: Mytho...":

Two hundred years later in this country, Orthodox Lutherans are still scarcer than hen's teeth.

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Do Not Try To Remain a Lutheran at WELS'
Martin Luther College.
Larry Olson as a Professor of Doctrine


MLC Student:
I am with you on the NNIV. The NIV was barely usable, and even then we had to do some teaching around some of it. Your statement about having commissions and meetings until we are forced to agree is exactly right on. I am tired of being hit over the head with forced changes. I'd also add in "or until you get sick of it, or until you make enough of an issue that we can kick you out for causing strife." 


The only reason why I can see some in the WELS supporting it is to get rid of the Confessions. With the NNIV, defending most of the doctrines of the Lutheran Church will be impossible. Keep hitting on this, and hit hard.

As for Larry Olson teaching doctrine... I can't imagine a worse class to be in. At least in Lyle Lange's classes we got SOME decent stuff and had to have a copy of the Confessions, but looking at the book list, Larry doesn't even know what the Confessions are.

***

GJ - They hired Larry Olson because of his DMin at Fuller Seminary, not in spite of it.

Likewise, Paul Calvin Kelm's class at Wisconsin Lutheran College was nothing but Arminian doctrine and Church Growth.

---

1580 has left a new comment on your post "Do Not Try To Remain a Lutheran at WELS' Martin L...":

I heard from a friend that took Lyle's Doctrine I class that the BoC isn't required...but his For God so Loved the World book is.

The Wittenberg Theologians or Walther and Valleskey?
I Will Get Back To You on This.





Please explain to me how this make-a-decision-for UOJ
is an antidote to synergism and semi-pelagianism.

Delicious Quotation from Hardt:
UOJ and Huberism

UOJ and CG Enthusiasm go together,
like UOJ and the NNIV.


AC V has left a new comment on your post "Beyond Belief: Using Huber To Promote Huberism":

This quote from Hardt's paper is delicious:

Huber does not conceal his disagreement with the Wittenberg theologians. Huber himself does not uphold his own difference between general and special justification: “Answer: they are not two.”41 How far he had gone in his thoughts concerning the uniqueness of general justification is possible to show through his words about the wrath of God as removed by Christ: “Truly that GENERAL REMISSION OF SINS, which has become ours through the blood of Christ, includes many, who are ungrateful toward God, and who dare to destroy and annihilate their heritage through impure lives. Therefore, although it is true that they have RECEIVED the remission of sins, nevertheless they are AGAIN condemned because of their negligence and are forced to pay for all their debts.”42 Huber must reintroduce the Law through a new act of God, being the consequence of the rejection of the Gospel. His adversaries easily refuted this theological construction by pointing to John 3:36: “The wrath of God abideth on him,” showing that those words imply that “the wrath of God had never, not even for a moment, been removed. Although the treasury of the expiation of sins has been obtained for them and has been offered in the Gospel, it has never been conferred upon them because of their unbelief, neither has it ever been received by them, as they lack faith, the only means to receive the forgiveness of sins.”

http://luk.se/Justification-Easter.htm

The orthodox Lutheran position vs. UOJ/Huberism as restated by orthodox Lutheran teachers at Wittenberg University some 20 years after the Book of Concord:

"Although the treasury of the expiation of sins has been obtained for them and has been offered in the Gospel, it has never been conferred upon them because of their unbelief, neither has it ever been received by them, as they lack faith, the only means to receive the forgiveness of sins.”

Who Is Polycarp Leyser?
The Founder of a Dynasty of Orthodox Theologians,
Chemnitz Biographer, Huber's Opponent

Polycarp Leyser, 1552-1610

Wikipedia:


Supported by his father, his uncle Andreae and later his stepfather Osiander, and also with input from his teacher Martin Chemnitz, Leyser came to have an ingrained support for Lutheran orthodoxy - indeed, at a difficult time for Lutheranism, he was one of those who founded that orthodoxy. In the creative force of his Loci theologici (1591/92), Harmonia evangelica (1593),Postilla (1593) and De controversiis iudicium (1594), his theological position was forged by the dispute sparked by Crypto-Calvinism in Saxony, by the 'Exorzismusstreit', by the difficulties over Lutheran Christology and by Huber's debate.

Education

Polykarp's father Kaspar Leyser (20 July 1526 - end of 1554, Nürtingen) was a pastor in Winnenden then in Nürtingen, giving Polykarp an insight into theology at an early age. Kaspar agreed with Jacob Andreae that government of the laypeople should remain entirely in the pastors' hands, amounting to the establishment of a denomination-wide consistory. He also corresponded with John Calvin, who reserved judgement on the project. They incurred the disapproval of Christoph, Duke of Württemberg. At the instigation of Johannes Brenz this suggestion failed, since Brenz feared it would lead to the church in Württemberg losing control to a centralised consistory.

Polykarp's mother Margarethe was a daughter of Johannes Entringer (a merchant from Tübingen), making her a sister of Jakob Andreaes. On Kaspar's death in 1554, she remarried to Lucas Osiander the Elder. In 1556 the family moved to Blaubeuren, where Polykarp attended the Klosterschule and grew up alongside three of Lucas's sons. In 1562 he continued his education in the Pädagogium in Stuttgart. On his mother's death in 1566 his stepfather sent him to the University of Tübingen, where he studied Protestant theology on a ducal stipend. In Tübingen he met Ägidius Hunnius the Elder, soon becoming close friends with him. In 1570 he became a Master of Arts and soon became a 'Stiftsrepetent'. His main theological influences at this time were Jacob Heerbrand, Andreae and Erhard Schnepf. Leyser distinguished himself with outstanding exam results and so in 1572 Andreae let him take over leadership of disputations on the doctrine of justification by faith. In 1573 he was ordained and was granted a parish in Göllersdorf in lower Austria, where he joined the imperial councillor and erbtruchsess Michael Ludwig von Puchheim (1512–1580), who introduced him to court life under Maximilian II. He soon made his mark in Graz and wanted to look for a job there, but Osiander and Puchheim discouraged him. Instead he returned to Tübingen, where he rose to become a doctor of theology on 16 July 1576 alongside his friend Hunnius. Initially he had limited job prospects, but this was soon to change.

[edit]Wittenberg Wittenberg University had seen drastic changes in personnel since 1574 due to the overthrow of the Philippists, along with student discontent against the lecturers. After the death of Kaspar Eberhard, head of the theology department, in October 1575, the students asked David Chytraeus to take over the Generalsuperintendentur in Wittenberg - he refused the offer. Next, in November 1575, they chose Leyser, who accepted. With the post came that of parish priest of the Stadtkirche Wittenberg.

At first Leyser was merely on a two-year loan from Louis III, Duke of Württemberg to Augustus, Elector of Saxony. On 20 January 1577 he preached a trial sermon in Dresden. On 3 February he was formally inducted into his role at Wittenberg. Leyser then made quick trip from Dresden to Austria to "pick up his bags". On 12 May he was back in Wittenberg and took up his official duties, aged only 25. Such a young man holding the highest church office in Wittenberg, before even being noticed in theological circles in Saxony, attracted much attention and some imputed his appointment to nepotism - until 8 June he was not even a professor of the theology department and until 20 November 1577 not a member of the consistory.

However, Leyser's calming of the situation after the expulsion of the Crypto-Calvinists and the reorganisation of the university was so successful that his critics were soon silenced. He was best served by his rhetorical skills and by an undemanding and reliable character, increasing his popularity among his students, including Philipp Nicolai and Johann Arndt. Leyser's skills were also seen in the drafting of the Formula of Concord and the publication of the Book of Concord in 1580. He developed close links with Martin Chemnitz and Nikolaus Selnecker. Leyser and Selnecker were asked to sign up to a Commission in Saxony on the Formula, that Leyser himself had signed on 25 June 1577 as first minister. He immediately took part in the important theological meetings in Saxony, acting as their recording secretary. The inhabitants of Wittenberg always saw him as an outsider, however, and acted as a thorn in his side. To neutralise this he married a local girl in March 1580, namely Elisabeth, daughter of the painter Lucas Cranach the Younger. The marriage took place in the Wittenberger Rathaus and was overshadowed by student rioting and heavy drinking, which the town authorities had to deal with later.

In 1581 Leyser was again a 'visitator' to the Saxon Kurkreis, where he was mainly concerned with primary education and the Fürstenschules in Meissen, Schulpforta and Grimma. His publications at this time were limited to funeral sermons and disputations, above all attacking opponents of the Formula of Concord. Tilemann Hesshus was his bitterest opponent at this time in the enforcement of 'Ubiquitätslehre'. The disputes were fought at symposia, including one at 1583 in Quedlinburg, where Leyser witnessed the last speech by his mentor Chemnitz. On 9 September 1584 the superintendent of Brunswick resigned and its inhabitants wanted Leyser to take over the post, but he refused it on Selnecker's advice due to his obligations to Augustus of Saxony.

Leyser gave Augustus's funeral oration after the latter's death in August 1586. His successor, Christian I, tended towards Calvinism and so this began to prevail. Christian freed pastors and teaching staff from their obligation to sign the Formula of Concord at their ordination. Considered to be the main representative of the Lutheran concord under Augustus, Leyser was increasingly exposed to the hostility of Nikolaus Krells and Johann Major, whose influence in the university and Konsistorialangelegenheiten was rising. Leyser was so incensed by this hostility that he warned his students off studying for a master's degree under Major. When the Calvinist Matthias Wesenbeck was buried in the Schlosskirche at the feet of Martin Luther, Leyser preached the funeral sermon, in which he claimed that Wesenbeck had renounced Calvinism on his deathbed and died a good Lutheran. This provoked such an uproar that Leyser had to move to Brunswick.

Beyond Belief:
Using Huber To Promote Huberism







AC V has left a new comment on your post "Digging Up an Obscure Theologian: AC V Has a Busy ...":

K. Marquart is aware of Hardt's paper and the Huber position:

The trouble with these repulsive “Kokomo” statements is that they ignore the pivotal significance of the means of grace and thereby abandon the proper distinction of Law and Gospel. That, too, in essence is what was wrong with Samuel Huber’s proposal, early in the 17th century, of a notion of “universal justification,” which was duly rejected by representative Lutherans at the time. The story is told in detail by Dr. Tom Hardt of Sweden, in the 1985 Festschrift for Robert Preus, A Lively Legacy.7 Hardt is a meticulous scholar who demonstrates in detail the difference between the wrong sort of “objective justification,” as taught by Huber, and the right sort, as found in C.F.W. Walther’s Easter preaching and theology.

"Objective Justification":

http://www.angelfire.com/ny4/djw/lutherantheology.marquartjustification.html  (That is Jay Webber's one-sided website promoting UOJ and Jay's own geneology.)


Huber and Walther

Jay Webber quotes the Pietist Rambach with approval,
Jay is also a Tom Hardt UOJ fan.


bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Calov, Gerhard, and Quenstedt: Are These Men Addre...":

Samuel Huber (1547‐1624) has been the UOJer's alibi man ever since 1870. The reason the terms OJ and UOJ are allegedly not found in the Orthodox theologians is Huber made the terms radioactive even though Luther and the Orthodox theologians all supposedly believed in UOJ. What a bunch of bunk!

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2011/01/wels-bourman-uoj.html

Schmidt states that old dogmaticians didn’t often speak of universal, objective justification because of Huber who taught “that God had not only justified all men already, but had also elected them to eternal life” (21).

---

Another UOJ Stormtrooper will show up to speak at the Ft. Wayne Conference -


Lutheran Confessions Symposium:
Justification in a Contemporary Context

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

1:30 p.m.“The Doctrine of Justification after Google”Dr. Lawrence R. Rast, Jr.Sihler Auditorium
2:45 p.m.“Evangelicals and Lutherans on Justification: Similarities and Differences”Dr. Scott R. MurraySihler Auditorium
3:45 p.m.“From Schleiermacher to Ritschl: An Overview of the Doctrine of Justification in the 19th Century”Dr. Naomichi MasakiSihler Auditorium
5:00 p.m.Choral Vespers Kramer Chapel
6:15 p.m.Dinner Katherine Luther Dining Hall

Thursday, January 19, 2012

8:30 a.m.“The New Perspective on Paul: Justification and Its Interpretation of Luther”Dr. Erik M. HeenSihler Auditorium
10:00 a.m.Chapel Kramer Chapel
10:30 a.m.Coffee Break Student Commons
11:15 a.m.“Justification: Jesus vs. Paul”Dr. David P. ScaerSihler Auditorium
12:15 p.m.Lunch Katherine Luther Dining Hall
1:45 p.m.“A Catholic Perspective on the Joint Declaration of the Doctrine of Justification”Dr. Christopher J. MalloySihler Auditorium
2:45 p.m.“Justification in the Finnish Luther School”Dr. Gordon L. IsaacSihler Auditorium
3:45 p.m.Panel Discussion: Similarities and Dissimilarities on Justification: Comparing Reformation Era and Contemporary Views Sihler Auditorium
4:45 p.m.Vespers and Organ RecitalMr. Timothy Spelbring, OrganistKramer Chapel
5:30 p.m.Reception Student Commons
6:30 p.m.Banquet Katherine Luther Dining Hall

Friday, January 20, 2012

9:00 a.m.“The Eucharistic Prayer and Justification”Prof. Roland ZieglerSihler Auditorium
10:00 a.m.“Atonement and Justification in the Theology of Gerhard Forde: A Contemporary Context”Dr. Jack D. KilcreaseSihler Au