AC V has left a new comment on your post "Digging Up an Obscure Theologian: AC V Has a Busy ...":
K. Marquart is aware of Hardt's paper and the Huber position:
The trouble with these repulsive “Kokomo” statements is that they ignore the pivotal significance of the means of grace and thereby abandon the proper distinction of Law and Gospel. That, too, in essence is what was wrong with Samuel Huber’s proposal, early in the 17th century, of a notion of “universal justification,” which was duly rejected by representative Lutherans at the time. The story is told in detail by Dr. Tom Hardt of Sweden, in the 1985 Festschrift for Robert Preus, A Lively Legacy.7 Hardt is a meticulous scholar who demonstrates in detail the difference between the wrong sort of “objective justification,” as taught by Huber, and the right sort, as found in C.F.W. Walther’s Easter preaching and theology.
"Objective Justification":
http://www.angelfire.com/ny4/djw/lutherantheology.marquartjustification.html (That is Jay Webber's one-sided website promoting UOJ and Jay's own geneology.)
