ICHABOD, THE GLORY HAS DEPARTED - explores the Age of Apostasy, predicted in 2 Thessalonians 2:3, to attack Objective Faithless Justification, Church Growth Clowns, and their ringmasters. The antidote to these poisons is trusting the efficacious Word in the Means of Grace. John 16:8. Isaiah 55:8ff. Romans 10. Most readers are WELS, LCMS, ELS, or ELCA. This blog also covers the Roman Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodoxy, and the Left-wing, National Council of Churches denominations.
Thursday, October 20, 2011
WELS Essay Files Warning:
Set Filter To Accept UOJ
bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Teaching Against Justification By Faith Has Toxic ...":
"There is so much of this UOJ bile in the WLS online essay files"
True. I have my browser SafeSearch filter set to No UOJ, and the filter clogs up and computer crashes every time I navigate to the WELS Essay files.
Occupy London protests — an eyewitness reports « Churchmouse Campanologist
Occupy London protests — an eyewitness reports « Churchmouse Campanologist:
"Two more things: one, banking is our only remaining ‘industry’ here in the UK. We’ve lost our manufacturing and our services. Two, a Tobin Tax on financial transactions, mooted around the EU, would kill off our one remaining means of self-sufficiency. So, pray tell, what happens when the banks and their highest earning employees are gone?"
'via Blog this'
The Official Norms of the Wisconsin Synod Are Not the WELS Essay Files,
But the Word and the Confessions
AC V has left a new comment on your post "Another Fuller Program Will Cure the Ills Caused b...":
Notice how the WELS Constitution reads for synod and its districts:
ARTICLE II
Confession of Faith
Section 1. The synod/district accepts the canonical books of the Old and New Testaments as the divinely inspired and inerrant word of God, and submits to this Word of God as the only infallible authority in all matters of doctrine, faith, and life ("and practice" is in the district constitution).
Section 2. The synod/district also accepts the confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church contained in the Book of Concord of 1580, not insofar as, but because they are a correct presentation and exposition of the pure doctrine of the word of God.
I dug out my congregation's constitution. Notice the difference:
Section 4.
Hence, no doctrine shall be taught or tolerated in this congregation which is in any way at variance with these symbolical books and the Holy Scriptures.
Section 5.
Likewise, all controversies which may arise in this congregation shall be decided and adjusted according to this norm of doctrine and practice.
Is there significance that in the synod constitution there is no "all controversies shall be decided and adjusted according to this norm of doctrine and practice" I.e. Scripture and the Confessions?
I think so. Ask your local WELS pastor or synod official, "Is the Book of Concord the final word on interpreting a disputed doctrine, esp. when the BoC addresses the doctrine in question?
Vestiges of first WELS president Johannes Muehlhauser who said the Confessions were "paper fences."
***
GJ - Now the Mequon graduates say that the Confessions are "boring and irrelevant." They would not say that if they actually studied the Book of Concord.
Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Justification, Part 2.
Calov and Chemnitz, or Bivens and Valleskey?
Hmmmm.
Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Justification, Part 2: "The way is broad that leads to damnation, and there are many that walk in it. Mt 7:13.
[PAR – Here Chemnitz asks the very specific question: “Are all men justified?” He makes no distinctions, as modern theologians have done. He does not speak of an “objective sense” in which all men are justified, and then a “subjective sense” in which only believers are justified. Nothing of the sort. He simply responds to this simple question with a simple answer, “There are many who walk on the way that leads to damnation.” In other words, “No, not all men are justified. Far from it.”]"
'via Blog this'
Teaching Against Justification By Faith Has Toxic Consequences
AC V has left a new comment on your post "Another Fuller Program Will Cure the Ills Caused b...":
Excellent observations, rlschultz!
Did you catch how Bivens described the pastor's role in the Divine Service rite of Confession/Absolution in his Q&A answer posted here on Ichabod (http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2011/10/false-teachers-mislead-students-at.html)?
"This is why (AC V - i.e. UOJ) we may speak to one another to say 'Your sins are forgiven' or 'In the name of God, I forgive your sins.' This is why a pastor, acting on behalf of all the Christians in the assembly, says the same thing."
That's not how the rite reads even in the WELS CW hymnal: "Therefore, as a called servant of Christ and by his authority, I forgive you..."
***
GJ - UOJ extinguishes the concept of the Means of Grace and obliterates the real Gospel with a fake Gospel of all-forgiveness masking all-law, which is really their message for most people. For the right people, it is all-forgiveness, which means they can do whatever they want. Notice how they waver between excusing whatever they do while condemning everyone else.
Another Fuller Program Will Cure the Ills Caused by Previous Fuller Programs in WELS.
Enthusiasm Breeds Enthusiasm
rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Gottesdienst Online: Memo to Synod: Mind Your Own ...":
Allegedly, the forthcoming emphasis for the WELS Stewardship Sunday is an emphasis upon time and talents of the laity. Recently, I heard a pastor call it "our ministry", as in "everyone is a pastor". There are several aspects of this attitude which bear emphasis. First, there is a downgrading of pastoral ministry, especially as it applies to the Means of Grace. Secondly, this places emphasis upon the laity as being stakeholders. It is akin to a communitarian approach to public ministry. The effect of this is to make members hamsters on a treadmill. This approach manifests itself with a nonstop parade of committee meetings, agendas, workshops, and lame "Bible studies". Great emphasis is placed upon members serving, with continued reminders that the "ball is in their court". The "technician approach" is undertaken, with members getting the impression that all one has to do is flip the right switches and tweak the controls, and the plans will fall into place. Plausible deniability is built in to this with certain Scripture passages that are proof texted to support the effort. What you end up with are members who no longer believe in the Efficacy of the Word and have instead become small m Methodists.
***
GJ - The Lutherans really need a comprehensive study of the Book of Concord, but who will lead them? The faculties despise their own confessions and reject them. The MDivs find the Book of Concord "boring and irrelevant."
If there were a groundswell to study the Confessions, the Conference of Pussycats would finally find their claws and stop it. After all, Mequon has dogmatics notes that label justification by faith passages from the orthodox as "MISLEADING." That is also why Mequon is hotter than Georgia asphalt to buy the NNIV.
---
AC V has left a new comment on your post "Another Fuller Program Will Cure the Ills Caused b...":
Excellent observations, rlschultz!
Did you catch how Bivens described the pastor's role in the Divine Service rite of Confession/Absolution in his Q&A answer posted here on Ichabod (http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2011/10/false-teachers-mislead-students-at.html)?
"This is why (AC V - i.e. UOJ) we may speak to one another to say 'Your sins are forgiven' or 'In the name of God, I forgive your sins.' This is why a pastor, acting on behalf of all the Christians in the assembly, says the same thing."
That's not how the rite reads even in the WELS CW hymnal: "Therefore, as a called servant of Christ and by his authority, I forgive you..."
Anglican Curmudgeon: The Dog in the Manger
Anglican Curmudgeon: The Dog in the Manger:
'via Blog this'
'via Blog this'
The Episcopal hierarchy stole this property and closed it.
The members left the denomination, so the denomination took the property.
VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - Excommunication of Truth: The Lies and Spin of San Diego Episcopal Bishop Mathes.
Bishops and DPs Love To Trash Honest Lutheran Writers
VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - Excommunication of Truth: The Lies and Spin of San Diego Episcopal Bishop Mathes:
'via Blog this'
Excommunication of Truth: The Lies and Spin of San Diego Episcopal Bishop James R. Mathes
News Analysis
By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
October 14, 2011
VOL: It is partly about power - power wielded by liberal and revisionist bishops who have "another gospel" that is not the genuine Good News proclaimed in Holy Writ. As a result, tens of thousands of Episcopalians have left the Episcopal Church and are forming orthodox Anglican communities of faith that do proclaim the Good News that does not include endorsing a variety of pansexual behaviors, is not accepting of sexual sin and demands that all repent and come to a knowledge of Jesus Christ. It IS primarily about "scriptural interpretation" and theology and the wielding of power is a part of it.
Bishop Mathes has lost fully one quarter (nine) of his parishes (Episcopalians) to other Anglican jurisdictions because of the Episcopal Church's apostasies.
On the issue of power.
No Presiding Bishop has wielded more power in the history of The Episcopal Church than Katharine Jefferts Schori. She has deposed more bishops than any other Presiding bishop in American ecclesiastical history.
She has spent more money (upwards of $22 million) on lawyers to litigate for properties that she and her bishops will ultimately be forced to sell than any other Presiding Bishop in history.
Recently, Bishop Paul Marshall of Bethlehem came out blasting her silence over l'affair Bede Parry (a pederast former RC priest Jefferts Schori admitted into TEC) threatening to tell all in an article, maybe even a book, on cover-ups in the Episcopal Church that he knows about. She has intimidated her bishops into silence about the real goings on behind the scenes in TEC, according to the Bethlehem Bishop.
Jefferts Schori is a bully who bullies bishops who don't fall into line with her revisionist gospel.
What is happening to South Carolina Bishop Mark Lawrence is a pure power play to wrest the diocese from him and turn it over to a liberal bishop.
MATHES: To fully understand this situation, it is important to grasp the canonical (i.e. legal) structure of The Episcopal Church. Parishes are creations of the diocese in which they are situated, in some cases deriving their tax-exempt status because they are an irrevocable part of the diocese. As a condition of ordination, clergy vow obedience to their bishop. Congregations begin as mission churches under the direct supervision and financial support of the bishop with property held by the diocese. When such a church becomes a parish, by vote of diocesan legislature, the congregation pledges to be subordinate to the constitution and canons of the Episcopal Church as well as the constitution and canons of the diocese. After becoming a parish, they may incorporate under the religious incorporation statutes of the state in which the congregation is situated. The diocese will usually transfer title to real property to the parish at that time to be held in trust for The Episcopal Church.
VOL: Legally correct. Perhaps. It should be remembered that nearly every parish was built and paid for by its people, not the church. The Dennis Canon has been defanged in the State of South Carolina. By no means is there certainty that the National Church will win in Ft. Worth, Virginia, San Joaquin or Quincy. Even if they do, the victories will be pyrrhic. TEC is losing market share and closing the equivalent of one whole diocese a year. The Diocese of Delaware will put its cathedral on the chopping block next year. The rump Bishop of Pittsburgh is trying to cut deals with a modicum of success, but at the end of the day, he will be left with empty properties he will be forced to sell for pennies on the dollar in the name of the Dennis Canon, Jefferts Schori and The Episcopal Church.
Even when they win the properties in property disputes, the victories are pyrrhic. The congregations are aging fast and disappearing. There is virtually no youth coming forward to take their place in the coming years either in the pews or pulpits.
MATHES: When individuals purported to alienate property, which had, been given to The Episcopal Church, I was bound by my fiduciary role as a bishop to prevent that from happening. Because The Episcopal Church, like so many others, follows state laws of incorporation, I had no alternative but to file suit in civil court to remedy the matter. This is analogous to a landlord finally going to civil court to gain relief from a non-paying renter or an owner using legal means to deal with a squatter. Thus, those leaving The Episcopal Church were catalysts of these lawsuits by breaking their solemn vows and by attempting to seize property they had no right to possess.
VOL: Not true. Some bishops have settled without going to court. Mathes conveniently forgets that the bishops of Central Florida, Dallas, Kansas and New Jersey have settled property disputes without going near a courtroom.
MATHES: What is particularly regrettable about Ms. Hemingway's piece is confusion about the relationship between The Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion, which is easily remedied with a simple visit to the Anglican Communion's official website. There you will find every diocese of The Episcopal Church in their cycle of prayer; you will not find The Anglican Church in North America on that list. This is not to say they do not need our prayers. It is simply an indicator of who is an Anglican and who has merely appropriated the label. You will not find Missouri Synod Lutherans there either. Thus, The Episcopal Church remains a constituent member of the Anglican Communion. Despite Ms. Hemingway's interpretations, our leader (called a primate), the Most Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori, is a participant in the Meeting of Primates of the Anglican Communion; Robert Duncan, the leader of the breakaway Anglican Church in North America, is not. At our last House of Bishops meeting, a gathering of all bishops of The Episcopal Church, we were visited by the primates of Japan and Central Africa. Like an eclectic extended family, we have our differences, but we regularly gather together.
VOL: The ABC or the Anglican Consultative Council might not recognize The ACNA and AMiA, but Archbishop Duncan, (ACNA) Bishop Chuck Murphy (AMiA) and all their fellow bishops are recognized by GAFCON/FCA and have strong collegial ties with nearly all Global South Anglican provinces including Nigeria, Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda, South East Asia and the Southern Cone - together they represent more than 80% of the Anglican Communion
MATHES: Ms. Hemingway suggests that The Episcopal Church is depriving these departing Episcopalians of a relationship to Anglican bishops and foreign dioceses. Oddly, these individuals claim to desire a relationship with a bishop of their own choosing. But bishops are those who by definition maintain order and oversight over the church. To put it in historical terms, this is rather like choosing to succeed from the nation when the current leadership is not to your liking. Thus, when the presiding bishop of The Episcopal Church urges her colleagues not to provide aid and comfort to those who would undermine our church, she has history on her side.
VOL: How much "order and oversight" has there been since Bishop Gene Robinson, an avowed non-celibate homosexual, was ordained to the episcopacy in 2003? It has brought nothing but chaos to the whole church. In nearly every diocese priests of conscience have asked for oversight or been forced to flee.
The argument that "choosing to succeed from the nation when the current leadership is not to your liking" is absurd. We can vote the leadership out or we can leave the nation (read church), which over 100,000 have done. Jefferts Schori could step down as the Archbishop of Canterbury is said to be contemplating -- 10 years before his time.
How much history will the Presiding Bishop have when all the indications are that by 2050 the Episcopal Church will be a shadow of its former self with a small handful of dying dioceses and large churches that have consolidated from dying ones? AMIA and ACNA are not looking for aid and comfort from TEC. They have never asked for it nor do they want it. They are getting on with the business of preaching the Good News, taking up the urgent call of the Great Commission and making disciples of Christ that TEC is not. And yes, they are planting new churches, opening up new dioceses across the country. What about that does Mathes not understand?
MATHES: In the final analysis, no one has been excommunicated; rather some individuals have left our church. On their way out, they have tried to take what does not belong to them and, in an unimaginative attempt to cover their unseemly behavior, they have pointed the finger at their victim, The Episcopal Church. The Wall Street Journal and Ms. Hemingway have either been duped or shown a stunning lack of care in reporting. The only thing in this story that has been excommunicated is the truth.
VOL: What do you call "inhibition" and "deposition" if it's not excommunication by another name? If TEC is a "victim", it is a victim of its own bad theology and equally bad morals. TEC is reaping what it is sowing. It is sowing to the wind and reaping the whirlwind. TEC's own decline and fall is happening because they are doing it to themselves. No one is doing it to them.
---
Re: Excommunication of Truth: The Lies and Spin of San Di...
+Mathes is delusional if he seriously imagines that TEC has the sole claim on Anglicanism in this country.
As I said over at StandFirm, there is no evidence in writing anywhere in the Anglican Communion which gives TEC permission to claim sole legitimacy....the recent "disaffiliation" clauses notwithstanding. They are merely "A CONSTITUENT MEMBER" of the Anglican Communion, and not THE SOLE CONSTITUENT MEMBER.
And with respect to the afore-mentioned clauses, I don't believe there's a court in the land that would tell any congregation who they could religiously affiliate with and not violate the U.S. Constitution by doing so.
TEC is its own worst enemy. The rot is from within and most emphatically NOT from without. It is morally and theologically bankrupt.
And where's the proof that you were harassed, "threatened with death and spit upon," Bishop Mathes?
Show us the proof, Bishop! Show us the police reports.
As I said over at StandFirm, there is no evidence in writing anywhere in the Anglican Communion which gives TEC permission to claim sole legitimacy....the recent "disaffiliation" clauses notwithstanding. They are merely "A CONSTITUENT MEMBER" of the Anglican Communion, and not THE SOLE CONSTITUENT MEMBER.
And with respect to the afore-mentioned clauses, I don't believe there's a court in the land that would tell any congregation who they could religiously affiliate with and not violate the U.S. Constitution by doing so.
TEC is its own worst enemy. The rot is from within and most emphatically NOT from without. It is morally and theologically bankrupt.
And where's the proof that you were harassed, "threatened with death and spit upon," Bishop Mathes?
Show us the proof, Bishop! Show us the police reports.
---
Mathes seems to be reflective of the delusional rot of TEC. It seems he actually believes the apostacy of Queen Katie and the ne Gospel of Holy Lawsuit.
In Pittsburgh, Bishop Duncan offered to give ownership of each parish's property to the parish. If the liberals wished to stray off somewhere, they were welcome to take their places of worship with them. Schori, on the other hand, refuses even to sell parish property to an orthodox Anglican parish. She views Christian Anglicans as "competitors". Maybe they are. Maybe the Anglicans are the Christians against the non-Christian hoards of Katie. If that's the case, there's really no competition - God will win.
It seems it comes down to God vs. goodies. More and more Anglican parishes are simply saying bye-bye. TEC is left with empty buildings, an empty Gospel message and empty souls.
TEC plays the "victim" because that is the classic liberal posture. If TEC is a victim, it is the victim of its own false teaching and apostacy.
---
The Anglican Curmudgeon has an excellent post about this story.
http://accurmudgeon.blogspot.com/
For the King,
Brian
***
GJ - The author of the WSJ article, Molie Hemingway, is a FB friend of mine, a highly respected author of features about denominations, including her LCMS.
Delegates discuss Bible translations | Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS)
DELEGATES DISCUSS BIBLE TRANSLATIONS
Delegates had an opportunity to ask questions on Bible translations at a special open forum at the convention.
Prior to the convention, the Translation Evaluation Committee (TEC) conducted a review of the recently released NIV 2011. WELS President Mark Schroeder appointed the TEC in 2010 because the NIV 1984, the translation currently used in WELS publications, will not be available for use in the near future.
After a preliminary report, the committee expanded the review, asking for reactions from professors and others on the entire translation.
Following that larger review and other additional study, the committee published a supplemental report with its recommendation. All delegates had access to the report online before the convention.
The committee's supplemental report stated that "the new NIV could serve us adequately as a translation for our synodical publications." The TEC came to that conclusion because it believes that
the revision is a faithful and accurate translation, for the most part, and that it is the best of all the versions for public reading in our churches;
no other current translation—one that addresses all the NIV's weaknesses without adding its own new ones to the mix—would be a significant improvement over the NIV; and
the use of the new NIV in its revised form would provide the greatest continuity and cause the fewest disruptions among our schools and congregations who are already using the older NIV.
Delegates discuss Bible translations | Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS):
'via Blog this'
The Lutheran | The Lutheran - Breaking News
The Lutheran | The Lutheran - Breaking News: "• The assembly responded with applause when offered the greeting “The Lord be with you” from Sayyid M. Sayeed, general secretary of the Islamic Society of North America."
'via Blog this'
“I have seen him in corridors of power speaking truth to the power,” said Sayyid M. Sayeed about Presiding Bishop Mark S. Hanson. Also, “No church or organization on earth can fight these mountains of bigotry alone. It is a collective responsibility.”
'via Blog this'
“I have seen him in corridors of power speaking truth to the power,” said Sayyid M. Sayeed about Presiding Bishop Mark S. Hanson. Also, “No church or organization on earth can fight these mountains of bigotry alone. It is a collective responsibility.”
Retired ELCA pastor Ralph Eckard knew Marple for 48 years, including the 27 years he served as an assistant to LCA presidents and later bishops. "Dorothy and I served as colleagues from 1976 until the merger in 1988," Eckard said. "She was a prodigious worker and a great colleague in every sense of the word. She had a breadth of experience, which she could apply to any situation."
Marple's funeral service is set for Saturday, Aug. 13, at Upper Dublin Lutheran Church, Ambler, Pa. She is survived by a sister, Virginia Reynolds; nine nieces; and a longtime friend, Lois Leffler.
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Gottesdienst Online: Memo to Synod: Mind Your Own Business

Gottesdienst Online: Memo to Synod: Mind Your Own Business: "Naiveté can get one into trouble. I should have smelled something fishy when I received a request from the LCMS International Center to have my parish participate in a “Perceptions of Ministry Inventory,” a survey designed “to enhance the formation and professional development of parish pastors”; had I been paying closer attention, I might have wondered why the Board for Pastoral Education and the Council of Presidents wanted to assure me that my “privacy and anonymity will be preserved throughout the process.”"
'via Blog this'
***
GJ - WELS did something like this. A circuit pastor was furious about this and wrote a letter.
Soon he was out of the ministry.
Read the article and ask where millions of dollars go. In fact, you will stop asking.
Anglican Church in North America (ACNA)/LCMS Talks
Anglican Church in North America (ACNA)/LCMS Talks: "Seminary to Host Anglican Church in North America and The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod Third Semiannual Dialogue
FORT WAYNE, IN (CTS)—Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne,
Indiana will be the site for the third installment of dialogue between
the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA) and The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS), October 27–28. The focus for this
meeting will be "Contemporary Issues Facing the Church in North
America.""
'via Blog this'
Church—Missouri Synod Third Semiannual Dialogue
FORT WAYNE, IN (CTS)—Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne,
Indiana will be the site for the third installment of dialogue between
the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA) and The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS), October 27–28. The focus for this
meeting will be "Contemporary Issues Facing the Church in North
America.""
'via Blog this'
The American Spectator : The Greatest Book in the English Language
The American Spectator : The Greatest Book in the English Language:
'via Blog this'
The King James Version (KJV) was born out of political compromise and royal patronage. Church life in 16th-century England was characterized by high and often violent tensions over vernacular translations of the ancient Latin version of the Bible known as the vulgate. Early translators such as William Tyndale and John Rogers were burned at the stake. When the Reformation gathered momentum after Queen Elizabeth came to the throne in 1558, the Puritans popularized the Geneva Bible, which went through 70 editions selling more than half a million copies. But when James succeeded Elizabeth, the new and scholarly king (called "the wisest fool in Christendom") identified footnotes in the Geneva Bible that he deemed to be subversive of royal authority.
At Hampton Court Palace in 1604, King James moved to end this subversion by convening a conference of established church bishops and moderate political Puritans. Keeping the latter on his side was one of James's priorities, although he was theologically opposed to their low church governance, as he showed by his comment, "No bishops, no King." Nevertheless James commissioned six committees drawn from both Puritan and Episcopalian scholars to translate a new English language version of the Bible dedicated to himself as "the principal mover and author" of the translation. So the KJV was conceived as a unifying production, endorsing the idea of a monarchical national church.
Do Not Go Gentle into that Good Night, LCMS:
You Are Worse Than ELCA, Because You Work with ELCA
AND Kick People Out of Church
Narrow-minded Lutheran has left a new comment on your post "More Proof That Lutherans in Large Groups Are Dumb...":
Nice job, Minn. South. Enjoy your $3.2-million while Missouri runs around and bad-mouths ELCA and ECUSA for kicking parishioners out of their churches.
***
GJ - I was thinking today - Concordia Publishing House has $26 million in the bank from their hymnal sales. (Remember someone scoffing about my claim that new hymnals are like minting money? It is.) CPH could have bought the building and leased it back to the campus ministry. Many different agencies could have done that. It would be hard to lose out, since the location alone made it valuable.
But readers, this is why all the Lutheran sects love to close congregations. They make the congregation pay for the mission building and land, even if the mission board did a horrible job of picking the land, the location, and the building. The members pay and pay. When the sect forecloses, the sect keeps all the money. Sometimes they let the congregation vote on which entity gets how much money.
At one point the closing of parishes was keeping many LCA districts in the black. In other words, they could pay outrageous staff salaries because they were spending the equity gained from the congregations trying to pay for their white elephants for 20 years and finally giving up.
The LCA in Michigan built an underground (earth-sheltered) building, which cost a lot of money but used very little energy. The community laughed at it and called it Holy Moley.
Wally Oelhaven's mission committee got some good land, allowed a zoning restriction on it, and erected one of the strangest and ugliest WEFs ever - and the competition was stiff. Shepherd of Peace. They moved and knocked the WEF down. The bulldozer took one jab at it and poof, down it went.
All the Lutheran groups waste millions of dollars, calling it reaching out with the Gospel. The leaders know how much each pastor makes, but no one dares to ask what the SP makes in salary and benefits.
Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Justification
Intrepid Lutherans: Enchiridion - Justification:
'via Blog this'
145 In What, Then, Does Justification of Man the Sinner Before God Consist According to the Statement of the Gospel?
- In this very thing, that God imputes to us the righteousness of the obedience and death of Christ the Mediator and thus justifies us freely out of grace, without our works or merits, alone by faith that apprehends the grace of God the Father and the merit of Christ; that is, He forgives us [our] sins, receives [us] into grace, adopts [us] as [His] sons, and receives [us] to the inheritance of life eternal. Ro 4:24–25, 28; 4:5; 10:4; Gal 3:24; Eph 2:8–9; Titus 3:5–7.
False Teachers Mislead the Students at Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary:
Forest Bivens on Forgiveness without Faith
AC V has left a new comment on your post "WELS Meditations Agrees with ELCA: Everyone Is Alr...":
WELS Q&A
Hello, A Baptist friend of mine is having trouble with pastors forgiving a congregation's sins. Could you please explain to me what gives pastors or others the right to forgive sins. I see James 5:16 and John 20:23. Still kind of confused. Thank you.
The Bible verses you mention are appropriate. It may also be said that all passages that invite and urge us to preach the gospel are also rightly mentioned. To preach the gospel is to proclaim the forgiveness of sins for the sake of Christ and his atoning work. No one will really understand what the Lutheran church teaches about "absolution" (declaring forgiveness of sins) unless he clearly understands the truth of objective or universal justification. That is at the very heart of what we believe and teach. Long ago God has already forgiven every human being his or her sins. Christ's life and death as our substitute is finished. Nothing more needs to be done by the sinner himself. A Christian can go to any person on earth and rightly say to him, "Your sins are forgiven." To put it another way: The forgiveness of sins is not a potential fact that becomes a reality only when sinners do something to qualify for it, or even when the gospel is proclaimed and personally received through faith. It has long been a reality to be proclaimed to sinners without conditions.
When Jesus Christ rose from the dead-2000 years ago, he was raised because of our justification-because we had already been justified (Romans 4:25). 2 Corinthians 5:19-21 and Romans 3:22-23 stress the same truth.
This is why we may speak to one another to say "Your sins are forgiven" or "In the name of God, I forgive your sins." This is why a pastor, acting on behalf of all the Christians in the assembly, says the same thing. This is not arrogance or trying to "play God." It is serving as God's ambassadors and messengers, which is what we are. Perhaps your Baptist friend is thinking, "This should not be done in a large group, since there may be people who are really not repentant or who are hypocrites in that church. You cannot tell them they are forgiven, can you?" We answer in this way: "Yes, we can and must say this, for God has invited and commanded us to do so. Jesus died and took away their sins, reconciling them to him - whether they believe it or not."
Lest we be misunderstood, we also say that if we know someone to be impenitent or a hypocrite, we will first speak to that person about sin, God's wrath, and eternal damnation in hell to expose his sinfulness and allow the Holy Spirit to convict him. That is also why the absolution in our public assemblies is always preceded by a general confession of sins and expression of repentance. But the fact remains-From God's standpoint Christ died for them and took away their guilt. We tell people this whether they are believers or unbelievers. And we hope and pray that this time they will believe us so that they too will know it is true and rejoice with us in the amazing grace of God.
- F. Bivens, Archived in Forgiveness and Repentance Section.
![]() |
F. Bivens, Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary |
OK, so what would the Book of Concord say?:
"Let any one of the adversaries come forth and tell us when remission of sins takes place. O good God, what darkness there is! ... what does the power of the keys effect, if sins have been already remitted? Here, indeed, they also labor much more, and wickedly detract from the power of the keys." - Augsburg Confession, Apology; Article XII. Of Repentance
AC V has left a new comment on your post "False Teachers Mislead the Students at Wisconsin L...":
More Bivens:
"The Lutheran Confessions clearly speak of objective or universal justification and the imputation or forgiveness of all people prior to and aside from justifying faith (e.g., FC, Ep, III, 4,7,9; Apol., IV, 103).
But the Confessions also use terms or phrases that if torn from the context of the rest of the Confessions, could be understood to say that justification is more of a potential reality without faith (e.g., "God wants to justify," Apol. IV, 69, 180, 292; "If we believe," e.g., FC, SD, III, 13; Apol IV, 238, 296; Apol XIII, 8; "When we believe," e.g., Apol. IV, 222, 382; FC, SD, XI, 38).
Lutherans who seem to spend more time quoting the Lutheran Confessions than they do the Scriptures (AC V - What? Please explain! It's a bad thing to quote the Confessions?) have been known to pit subjective justification against objective justification and try to use the Confessions as their ally."
- "Getting The Right Message Out –
And Getting It Out The Right Way
With Special Emphasis on Public Worship and Classroom Instruction" p. 3
Wow. Typical UOJ Stormtrooper.
***
GJ - Bivens bragged about going to Fuller Seminary while gathered with the entire Midland circuit pastors, include the future DP John Seifert. That was in Seifert's driveway. Nevertheless, he told a seminarian, "I don't know where Jackson gets the idea that I went to Fuller."
WELS pastors lied so often that I began writing down their quotations in my Day-Timer, to read back to them.
WELS Stewardship Means: "What's In It for Me?"
![]() |
A commission on "Christian" fund-raising is considered unethical. But Jeff is a Church and Changer, like Kudu Don Patterson. |
rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Tim Glende's Anonymous Blog Hosts This Anonymous P...":
The use of Cornerstone was all the reason I needed as to why I finally left my former WELS congregation. When I read the name Jeff Davis in the council report section of the monthly newsletter, I was sure that none of my efforts would convince the congregational leadership that were going down the wrong path. When I called the congregation president, he acknowledged that Davis would be getting a commission. But, it was only 3% to 5% of the money raised through the capital appeal process. Furthermore, that commission had a cap on it. I was assured that I could find out what the cap is, but that information was never divulged.
When another congregation wanted to take on an expansion, they asked Cornerstone first. The pastor told what one of the lay leaders said, "I feel like we are being extorted". What would be against the law in the secular realm seems to be a normal mode of operation within some circles in the WELS.
rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "WELS Tetzels Are on the Pastoral Call List":
That every member visitation may have been the content of the letter that I recently received. Since I noticed the return address of the Love Shack, I threw it in the trash without reading it. Back in the 90's, the WELS synodical leadership was bellaching about a perceived shortage of pastors. Even back then, there was at least one planned giving counselor, who was an ordained pastor, in each of the twelve districts. The irony struck me as odd. It looks like the WELS leadership is setting up a roadblock. All of the WELS travelers will be shaken down by the highwaymen if they want to pass through.
***
GJ -
Code of Ethics
FRCI adheres to the standards of practice and code of ethics, as outlined by the Giving Institute (formerly the American Association of Fund Raising Counsel--AAFRC).
Standards of Practice
FRCI provides service to non-profit organizations that serve the public’s best interest.
FRCI engages clients that represent the broadest interests of society such as: religious, educational, health care, human service, arts, cultural, humanitarian, environmental, international, and other organizations benefiting humankind.
FRCI offers services which advance the goals of a client and which directly relate to philanthropy, such as studies, campaign management, annual development programs, planned giving, strategic planning, direct mail, telemarketing, management services, executive search, public relations, marketing and communications, software developers, organization development/management, prospect research, and training. FRCI and its principals participate in the philanthropic community.
Professional Code of Ethics
FRCI believes it is in the best interest of our clients that:
- Initial meetings with prospective clients should not be construed as services for which payment is expected.
- No payments of special consideration should be made to an officer, director, trustee, employee, or advisor of a not-for-profit organization as compensation for influencing the selection of fundraising counsel.
- No payments of special consideration should be made to an officer, director, trustee, employee, or advisor of a not-for-profit organization as compensation for influencing the selection of fundraising counsel.
- Fees should be mutually agreed upon in advance of services.
- A flat, fixed fee is charged based on the level and extent of professional services provided. Fees are not based on the amount of charitable income raised or expected to be raised.
- Contracts providing for a contingent fee, a commission, or a fee based on percentage of funds raised are prohibited. Such contracts are harmful to the relationship between the donor and the institution and detrimental to the financial health of the client organization.
- Fundraising expenditures are within the authority and control of the not-for-profit organization.
- FRCI feels it is in the best interest of clients that solicitation of gifts is undertaken by Board members, staff and other volunteers.
- Subsequent to analysis or study, FRCI should engage a client only when the best interest of the client is served.
- FRCI should not profit directly or indirectly from materials provided by others, but billed to the FRCI, without disclosure to the client.
- FRCI does not engage in methods that are misleading to the public or harmful to their clients; do not make exaggerated claims of past achievement; and do not guarantee results of promise to helps clients achieve goals.
- Any potential conflict of interest should be disclosed by the firm to clients and prospective clients.
- FRCI will not acquire or maintain custody of funds and/or gifts directed to client organization.
---
LutherRocks
has left a new comment on your post "WELS
Stewardship Means: "What's In It for Me?"":
It was Cornerstone that was the last straw for us. We could not give the blessings of our money to a church that was willing to take part of our first fruits and give it to an organization to do the work the pastor (and Elders)should have been doing all along; and I brought that to their attention. Patterson had time for writing a book, contributing/presenting writings/papers for this and that, workshops, retreats etc...ad nauseum. I didn't see the difference between what Cornerstone was doing and the money changers in the temple. It is all moving towards the fulfillment of Revelation anyway.
It was Cornerstone that was the last straw for us. We could not give the blessings of our money to a church that was willing to take part of our first fruits and give it to an organization to do the work the pastor (and Elders)should have been doing all along; and I brought that to their attention. Patterson had time for writing a book, contributing/presenting writings/papers for this and that, workshops, retreats etc...ad nauseum. I didn't see the difference between what Cornerstone was doing and the money changers in the temple. It is all moving towards the fulfillment of Revelation anyway.
The church is adopting from secular culture
more and more and will soon look no different than the state...the beast...all
in the name of the 'business of saving souls'. Ultimately we were booted over a
doctrinal issue but it all ties together eventually. Guys who push the warped
view of justification enable this kind of stuff to invade Christ's church. By
teaching universal absolution it begets upside down evangelism and then all bets
are off and anything goes. Call me a Jackson parrot. I don't care. I have seen
it first hand and speak from experience. I have come back from the dark side.
When Doebler told the praise band that Christ the Rock's growth was being
inhibited by the band's performance...well need I say it was a wake up call of
Biblical proportions?
WELS Tetzels Are on the Pastoral Call List
Caulk, Mr Vernon L - Ministry of Christia - Milwaukee WI 10/10/2011 Christian Giving Counselor, AZ-CA and SC Districts
Hillmann, Mr Ron - Ministry of Christia - Milwaukee WI 10/10/2011 Christian Giving Counselor, SEW District
***
GJ - According to the Berg brothers, the WELS Giving Counselors get a commission on their sales. "It is in their contract. I have seen it."
Some good questions to ask the Tetzels are:
SP Schroeder writes that they are gearing up for an every member visitation across WELS. If that happens, it will be a miracle greater than the Crossing of the Red Sea. The pastors do not visit their own sick and shut-in members.
Oh wait. This is for money? When do they start?
The Shrinker-UOJ Stormtroopers Think the Ichabod Readers Are Mindless Fools.
Tim Glende Puts His Foot in It, Again
Glenda's anonymous comment on his anonymous blog:
There's no difference. The issue is this: do words have uniform grammatical meaning or are do they function differently in different contexts? In other words, Jackson's whole thing is that for him the word "justification" must always mean the same thing in every context. It means "to communicate forgiveness and to save." So, when people say "we believe in universal justification"- Jackson goes "aha! you believe in universal salvation." They respond and say "no, you've got us wrong. The word "justification" means in one context the act of forgiving by God (objective justification). And in another context it means the reception and communication of forgiveness through faith (subjective justification)." Jackson responds "no, the word means the same thing in every context. I don't care if you define it differently in the different contexts. I don't care if the people who came up with this distinction were using the word differently in different contexts. I say it means the same thing in every context and that meaning is the communication of forgiveness and salvation. So, whether you want to be or not, you're a universalist. And that's why you believe in the Church-growth movement! Ha, I'm smarter than you!" Then the people who follow him think "wow, how brilliant, he figure (sic) out what was wrong with all the synods. It's UOJ. He's got a Ph.D from Notre Dame. He must be smart. If I agree with him, I can be smart too!" And so his cult persists!
***
GJ - Glenda is the victim of a poor educational system, designed to give passing grades to mediocre students. One of the WELS teachers wrote to me about how she had to give good grades to the children of WELS officials, no matter how poorly they performed. The teachers tell the children that their education is vastly superior to anything in Missouri.
Glenda's excommunicated member has recorded in minute detail the bullying of the pastor. No one dare question him. He has 8 years of
I have simply said that if Glenda's members should be in awe of his MDiv from an unaccredited seminary, he should take off his shoes when addressing a genuine PhD, who also earned a degree at Yale, where his Uncle John Brug merely studied.
There is no difference, Glenda claims, but he had to post again about no difference. That sounds like an argument to me. That is the classic tactic of the false teacher, to claim that his opinion is no different from the traditional view, while insisting on his view alone. He also lied when he claimed he was not plagiarizing Groeschel. Glenda has trouble with the facts, let alone the truth.
Another tactic of the false teacher is to say, "This is your opinion." Glenda does not want to cite Luther, because he knows so little doctrine that he eagerly copies a clownish Mefodist. Now he must grapple with the Intrepids, who have come to similar conclusions on their own, in spite of having the same education as Glenda.
I have often quoted this from a great Lutheran theologian, Henry E. Jacobs - that many times the layman has a better grasp of the Word of God than the pastor. The layman studies the Word without the filter of Uncle Fritz' essay lovingly placed in the Holy of Holies (WELS Essay Files), kept there even if Fritz is now an atheist.
When the battle is joined, many pastors throw off their ennui and study the Word in a fresh light. The issue is not "how much education and where" but applying ourselves to the Word and the Confessions.
I will take Luther, Chemnitz, and Melanchthon as greater authorities and better exegetes than Uncle Fritz. No wonder the Syn Conference sects pretend to have a quia subscription to the Book of Concord while plagiarizing Groeschel, Driscoll, and Stanley Junior. Uncle Fritz was an Enthusiast, so they see everything through the filter of Enthusiasm.
Glenda should admit on his blog that Floyd Luther Stolzenburg led St. Paul, German Village (non-WELS at the time) into Church Growth, that Floyd had no business being a lay leader, let alone a pseuo-pastor and "evangelism consultant." Poor Tim was raised in a congregation and synod where right is wrong, and wrong is right.
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Tim Glende's Anonymous Blog Hosts This Anonymous Person Code-Named Joel.
Joel Says Joe Krohn Cannot Think for Himself
Actually, I put the whole unfortunate situation with Joe and his family at the feet of Greg Jackson. If Greg hadn't gotten Joe all hot an bothered about the UOJ "controversy" (truly the lamest, insignificant religious controversy that there has ever been in the whole history of Christendom), Joe wouldn't have entered into a pointless dispute with his home congregation. How many other lives will this man ruin?
***
GJ - The first logical fallacy is calling Joe Krohn a mindless follower of Ichabod, but that ignores the fact that he was sympathetic with Church and Change. The anonymous comment is also a put-down of Joe Krohn, a common tactic in WELS and other Pietistic sects.
Second, the author makes justification a non-argument, although he repeatedly posts about it.Exactly why has WELS been pounding UOJ since Richard Jungkuntz (died in ELCA) beat the drums for this precious doctrine. The entire UOJ Stormtrooper sorority imagines that the absolution of the world is the message of the Gospel. They never tire of assassinating anyone who disagrees with their fallacies, but they are unable to engage the issues.
The brave guru, Joel by name, a leader of the Pharisees, claims that Joe and Lisa Krohn were excommunicated for NOTHING!!! I refuse to copy his earlier illiterate comment. With respect, here is his corrected version.
If the debate was between limited atonement (Calvinism) and universal atonement (Lutheran), it would be a big deal. The UOJ "debate" is between universal atonement (anti-UOJ) and universal justification (UOJ). There is not a warm bucket of spit's difference between those two sides since neither side says anyone gets into heaven unless they are brought to faith. Yes, this is a pointless debate and now Joe Krohn has had an upheaval in his family and church life over NOTHING!!!!!
---
LutherRocks has left a new comment on your post "Tim Glende's Anonymous Blog Hosts This Anonymous P...":
Tell it to Pastor Rydecki and the other 90+ Intrepid Lutherans...
More Proof That Lutherans in Large Groups Are Dumber Than Babtists and Big Love Mormons.
The Synodical Sale of a Successful Campus Ministry Chapel
![]() |
"Sold!" |
The students were planning a bake sale to help raise finds to aid ULC's survival. I talked to some people who were simply perplexed as to why the MNS would want to destroy their chapel and evict them from such a beautiful facility so well-designed for Lutheran worship and so readily accessible for students. In fact, I took a photo of the ULC sign which captured in the same shot the 'Welcome to the University of Minnesota" sign. One block down the street from ULC (a block nearer to the heart of campus) was a fairly new Mormon temple, and next to that was the Baptist student church. I was simply stunned by the fact the Mormons and Baptists see the value of campus ministry in Minneapolis, with the Mormons making an investment in a student church while the LCMS abandons the one they have.
Synodical Smokescreens Always Work the Same Way
![]() |
This is another touching vignette from The Sausage Factory, Mequon. |
The denominational spin-doctors need to learn some new tactics. Their old methods worked well when they controlled the magazines and the grapevines.
But now, no one reads their insipid magazines, and anyone can search the web. Court cases are on the Net.
Aww. Synodical Whac-a-Mole was so much fun. Maybe they will bring it back, like Missile Command, so the drones can play it again.
SP Schroeder needs to study psychology or read The Kidnapper's Law and Gospel. When he bans people from reading Ichabod, the forbidden fruit is that much more tempting. And word gets out - "I am not to read or even touch it - lest I die."
Any college teacher knows that the best way to keep students from studying something is to make it required reading.
---
rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Synodical Smokescreens Always Work the Same Way":
This is a stellar example of how the synodical leadership is out of touch with many members. Prohibition rarely achieves its desired effect. We live in a culture where many have become less trusting and respectful of authority. Furthermore, we are admonished to be like the Bereans. That is why personal study of the Scriptures and the Confessions by the laity drives the UOJ fanatics even more stark raving mad. Many of them would rather have you eat the cotton candy Kelmed from the Enthusiasts. The effects of false doctrine are like a festering boil that needs to be lanced. Synodical leaders do the members a great disservice when they ask them to follow them blindly.
Paul McCain's Expert on UOJ Gets His Answer
Phase One of Jack Kilcrease -
Dr. Jack Kilcrease has left a new comment on your post "Kansas City Bishop Is First To Be Charged Criminal...":
"ELCA paid $40 million for covering up the abusive past of a man they were too happy to ordain."
As a conservative Lutheran, I of course do not believe that we should cast stones at any one. In that you make a good point.
But, seriously, I mean, where do you get this stuff? Do you have any actual evidence of this? I personally don't care much for the ELCA, but this claim about the 40 million dollars doesn't sound very credible to me. I will totally believe it if you can come up with evidence.
Your response: Blah, blah, blah. You miss spelled (sic) a word. Blah, blah, you're secretly a Catholic. Blah, blah, UOJ is universalism. Blah.
No need for a response then.
Here is a lengthy response to Jack Kilcrease.
It included the entire article from Saltzmann, a well known ELCA writer and editor.
Phase Two of Jack Kilcrease -
Jack Kilcrease had to keep it up. Why should he concede anything?
Dr. Jack Kilcrease said... Where's the 40 million? I see that they sued for 300 million, but I don't see anything about paying out 40 million. Again, people sue for all sorts of absurd amounts, but paying out is another issue. That was what my question was about.
BTW, I enjoyed my titles. I sent it to my parents and my wife, and they got a big kick out it. It reminds me of that movie "A Knight's Tale" where the Geoffrey Chaucer character has all these amusing titles he gives to Heath Ledger's character when he announces him "The protector of Grecian virginity!" "trained by the ELCA and working for the Anti-Christ, it's Jack Kilcrease!!!"
Jack's approach--which always includes his title "Dr"--is simply to mock the facts, perhaps to cast doubts on everything published on this blog. He has tender toes about UOJ, his history with ELCA, and his velcro-like affinity for another lazy mocker, Paul McCain.
Unfortunately for Kilcrease and McCain, their puerile responses only emphasize the truth. I do not make statements of fact unless they are supported with evidence, a habit they have not yet acquired. I said $40 million because I knew the story well and linked it at one time. I do not have the time to do Jack's homework for him, especially since he claims two doctorates in his marriage.
So far, all the UOJ advocates encountered on this blog are allergic to the facts. So I will post more of the hideous details that Jack scoffed at twice. I never said Kilcrease was secretly a Catholic. His own profile at a Catholic school says he teaches for them. He is a Catholic employee, which is quite an accomplishment for someone whose father graduated from the Sausage Factory in Mequon.
Bishop says he regrets minister's actions
Posted: Saturday, April 24, 2004
WICHITA FALLS - Lutheran Bishop Kevin S. Kanouse apologized Friday to victims of a former minister convicted of molesting boys, a day after his synod was hit with a nearly $37 million verdict in a sexual abuse lawsuit.
Gerald Patrick Thomas Jr. is serving 397 years in prison; the abuse was at the center of Thursday's multimillion-dollar verdict.
"We do express our regrets. We pledge to make sure people like Gerry Thomas never serve a church again," said Kanouse, who heads the Dallas-based Northern Texas-Northern Louisiana Synod.
Jurors sided with nine alleged sex abuse victims who sued the synod, part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, claiming a former bishop and his assistant ignored warnings about Thomas.
Earlier settlements involved the award of another $32 million. Church officials say the combined payout will be less than $69 million due to a complicated system of credits.
Kanouse insisted church officials did not know Thomas preyed on children.
"No one in the church knew he was a predator of children until he was arrested. Were there clues? Absolutely," he said.
The bishop maintained the synod already has a system in place for preventing ministers like Thomas from entering church service.
The verdict in the court case came a day before the synod began an annual three-day assembly in Wichita Falls.
Kanouse denied that going to court instead of settling was an act of defiance toward the victims.
"The bottom line is our insurance company thought it was worth taking it to trial," he said. "It was an act of trying to tell our story and see what the jury had to say. Well, the jury said we were liable and awarded against us."
Former Marshall minister faces new charge
Published: Monday, June 03, 2002
LONGVIEW (AP) — A former Lutheran minister accused of sex crimes involving boys has been arrested on a new charge.
Gerald Patrick Thomas Jr., the 40-year-old former minister of Marshall's Good Shepherd Lutheran Church, was held Friday night by Marshall police on a Harrison County District Court warrant for aggravated sexual assault, according to jail records.
Thomas had been free on bond for three separate state charges of sex crimes. He was awaiting sentencing on a federal charge of possession of child pornography, said Marshall lawyer Don Stokes.
The former pastor had admitted in federal court in Tyler that he allowed two teen-age boys to photograph themselves engaging in sex acts at his home.
A civil lawsuit filed earlier this year claimed that Thomas molested eight boys over several years and that his actions should have been halted by church leaders. The lawsuit also named the Chicago-based Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and several other church-related organizations as defendants.
Thomas resigned from the denomination's clergy roster about a year ago. He now lives with his sister in Ocala, Fla.
Judge seals deal in Lutheran sex abuse scandal
Published: Tuesday, April 13, 2004
MARSHALL (AP) — A judge approved and sealed a settlement Monday involving the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and 14 alleged sex abuse victims who claim church officials ignored warnings about an errant minister who was later convicted of molesting boys.
Several church agencies also were included in the deal, which Harrison County District Judge Bonnie Leggat sealed pending the outcome of a civil trial against the remaining defendant — the denomination's Northern Texas-Northern Louisiana Synod. Testimony is scheduled to start today.
The case of former Lutheran pastor Gerald Patrick Thomas Jr., who was sentenced last year to 397 years in state prison for sexually assaulting boys in this East Texas town, has drawn parallels from victims' advocates to some of the worst cases in the Roman Catholic abuse crisis.
Details of the pact will become public after the trial is over, he said.
Jennifer Ainsworth, attorney for the 5 million-member ELCA, said the denomination was pleased.
"We believe it's in the best interests of the ELCA and the kids," Ainsworth said. "We believe ELCA took responsibility for any involvement in this and the kids will be taken care of."
The victims and their families accused Lutheran officials of ignoring questionable behavior by Thomas. Private, internal memos detailed allegations against Thomas before his assignment to Good Shepherd Lutheran Church in Marshall in 1997.
Church officials, meanwhile, have repeatedly denied negligence.
Under the settlement, all money paid out will be put into trust funds for the victims; it won't be controlled by parents or guardians, attorneys said.
A jury of eight men and four women was selected last week before the settlement was confirmed.
Parents and guardians of most victims appeared before the judge to confirm they were satisfied with the settlement terms. In questioning of the victims' relatives Monday, the plaintiffs' lead attorney, Edward Hohn, characterized the settling defendants as "peripheral" and called the synod the "target" defendant in the case.
While allegedly aware of Thomas' "boundary issues" in seminary, the local synod did not share details of Thomas' background with the Marshall congregation later that year, court documents say. Court papers also claim that the church official in charge of pastor assignments at the time had himself been arrested twice for indecent exposure.
Thomas, 41, was charged in 2001 after a teenager found nude images of friends on the pastor's computer and tried to blackmail him.
Convicted on federal child pornography charges, Thomas is serving five years at the U.S. Penitentiary in Beaumont. His state sentence will start after that.
***
Originally, I said -
Steven
Goodrich has left a new comment on your post "Always
Glad To Answer Jack Kilcrease, Son of WELS ...":
After doing some more research, here's the breakdown of who paid what.
Prior to the civil trial in April, several defendants settled with the plaintiffs: Good Shepherd ($750,000); the ELCA church wide organization ($8 million); the Michigan candidacy committee that approved Thomas for ordination ($1.2 million); and Trinity Seminary ($22 million).
Nine of the 14 plaintiffs continued their suit against the Northern Texas-Northern Louisiana Synod; its former bishop, Mark Herbener; and his assistant, Earl Eliason. On April 22, the jury awarded $36.8 million to the plaintiffs, assigning liability for the abuse at 35 percent for Eliason, 23 percent for Thomas, 20 percent for Herbener, 20 percent for Trinity, and 2 percent for the candidacy committee. The ELCA wasn't assigned a percentage of liability. The percentage allocation confused defendants and their lawyers since Trinity had already settled and was no longer involved in the case.
Here is a link to the story in the Lutheran, but you need a subscription to read the entire thing.
http://www.thelutheran.org/article/article.cfm?article_id=2390
After doing some more research, here's the breakdown of who paid what.
Prior to the civil trial in April, several defendants settled with the plaintiffs: Good Shepherd ($750,000); the ELCA church wide organization ($8 million); the Michigan candidacy committee that approved Thomas for ordination ($1.2 million); and Trinity Seminary ($22 million).
Nine of the 14 plaintiffs continued their suit against the Northern Texas-Northern Louisiana Synod; its former bishop, Mark Herbener; and his assistant, Earl Eliason. On April 22, the jury awarded $36.8 million to the plaintiffs, assigning liability for the abuse at 35 percent for Eliason, 23 percent for Thomas, 20 percent for Herbener, 20 percent for Trinity, and 2 percent for the candidacy committee. The ELCA wasn't assigned a percentage of liability. The percentage allocation confused defendants and their lawyers since Trinity had already settled and was no longer involved in the case.
Here is a link to the story in the Lutheran, but you need a subscription to read the entire thing.
http://www.thelutheran.org/article/article.cfm?article_id=2390
Here's you a link, Jack.
http://amarillo.com/stories/042404/tex_regretact.shtml