Sunday, October 14, 2012

Bloomingdale church robbed of $100K worth of lights, audio equipment - chicagotribune.com

This is another way to rob people,
swindle them out of the Means of Grace.
Turn Moses into the Savior.


Bloomingdale church robbed of $100K worth of lights, audio equipment - chicagotribune.com:



After celebrating Mission Church’s one-year anniversary last weekend, Lead Pastor Jon Peacock said his non-denominational community near Bloomingdale had never felt stronger.
Yet it wasn’t until the 400-person congregation sat through services today without its normal sound, sights or lights that Peacock said they had reached “their finest hour.”
A trailer containing more than $100,000 worth of sound, screen and lighting equipment the church uses every Sunday was recently stolen from its regular spot in Carol Stream.
Peacock said church staff went out to the RV parking lot at the intersection of Gary and North Avenues in Carol Stream about 5:15 a.m. Sunday and reported it missing to police.
The staff believes it was taken overnight, but police are investigating, he said.
The church hosts its Sunday services in the gymnasium of Bloomingdale’s Stratford Middle School, Peacock said. The church-owned equipment was normally set up on Sunday mornings and packed away in the trailer on Sunday afternoons.
On Sunday, Peacock said the community was “incredibly supportive” and instead of focusing on anger, chose to pray.
“We decided to pray for these people – this is a reminder of why we’re in this community,” Peacock said. “This just solidifies we’re in the right place. This is the reason we started this church.”
Peacock said he and his staff are working with Carol Stream Police to locate the trailer.
While Mission Church’s staff is hoping for the prompt return of their equipment, they’re not putting their faith on hold.

“We’re not a church that’s held together by a building. We’ll meet in an open field if we have to,” Peacock said, jokingly.


'via Blog this'

Jack Kilcrease as Humpty Dumpty

Kilcrease requested his own Photoshop some time ago.
His wish has been granted.


arkos has left a new comment on your post "Do Not Play Games with Words - Or With the Word of...":

I feel like Alice, after reading Jack's meaningless response. I'd like to see a Jack Kilcrease as Humpty Dumpty photoshop:

`When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, `it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less.'

`The question is,' said Alice, `whether you can make words mean so many different things.'

`The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, `which is to be master - - that's all.'

Alice was too much puzzled to say anything.

---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Jack Kilcrease as Humpty Dumpty":

Another ROFLOLing post.

Is there no end to their madness?

My tummy is aching due to this. I can not stop LOLing.

LPC

---

bruce-church (http://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Jack Kilcrease as Humpty Dumpty":

I remember like it was yesterday that Dr. Kilcrease asked repeatedly for a photoshop of himself. That was a couple years ago. I'm glad his wish has been finally half-granted, because as I recall he wanted one of himself as a Storm Trooper or Darth Vader. So he probably is not pleased. :)

---

arkos has left a new comment on your post "Jack Kilcrease as Humpty Dumpty":

Thank you. That made my day.

---


Links about Justification by Faith 
and Justification without Faith (UOJ)


Luther's Galatians endorsed by reader

Luther's Galatians on Gnesio Lutherans

Roman Catholic adjunct Jack Kilcrease as Humpty Dumpty

Calov, quoted by Robert Preus, repudiated the UOJ position of WELS

Kilcrease, the McCain tutor, equivocates.

Buchholz is anti-Luther

Pastor Bickel on Tossing Rydecki Under the Bus

Church and Changer Jeff Gunn and His Mequon Class of Shrinkers

Paul McCain and Jon Buchholz - Bedfellows of Apostasy

Abraham Is the Common Theme in Justification - Justification by Faith

Pastor Rydecki's Account of His Suspension - October 9th

Intrepid Account October 6th- Pastor Rydecki Suspended

LutherQuest (sic) Opposes Justification by Faith

Warming Up the Tar and Feathers on LutherQuest (sic)

Pastor Bickel Answers Jon Buchholz

Kokomo Statements - WELS UOJ - JP Meyer

Jack Kilcrease Showing Signs of Stress

Dr. Lito Cruz and Brett Meyer Dispatch the UOJ Stormtroopers on Extra Nos

Mea Culpa. Mea Maxima Culpa



The chapel Internet service was out, so I tried moving the camera into the bedroom. However, the sound did not come across from there.

The good news is that I found the culprit - not a bug, but a plug that got pulled out.

"Always check the physical layer." Sure, try that in a panic.

The chapel service itself will be broadcast and recorded again tonight at 7 PM tonight.

Nineteenth Sunday after Trinity. Matthew 9:1-8.
Palsied Man Healed




The Nineteenth Sunday after Trinity


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn # 12                    This Day                 4:80
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed             p. 22
The Sermon Hymn # 268               Zion Mourns            4:98

The Theme Is Faith

The Communion Hymn #305:4-7                                4:23     
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #277               I Heard the Voice              4:57

Nineteenth Sunday After Trinity

O mighty and everlasting God, who by Thy Son Jesus Christ didst mercifully help the palsied man both in body and soul: We beseech Thee, for the sake of Thy great mercy: Be gracious also unto us; forgive us all our sins, and so govern us by Thy Holy Spirit, that we may not ourselves be the cause of sickness and other afflictions; keep us in Thy fear, and strengthen us by Thy grace that we may escape temporal and eternal wrath and punishment, through Thy Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

KJV Ephesians 4:22 That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; 23 And be renewed in the spirit of your mind; 24 And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness. 25 Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another. 26 Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath: 27 Neither give place to the devil. 28 Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth.

KJV Matthew 9:1 And he entered into a ship, and passed over, and came into his own city. 2 And, behold, they brought to him a man sick of the palsy, lying on a bed: and Jesus seeing their faith said unto the sick of the palsy; Son, be of good cheer; thy sins be forgiven thee. 3 And, behold, certain of the scribes said within themselves, This man blasphemeth. 4 And Jesus knowing their thoughts said, Wherefore think ye evil in your hearts? 5 For whether is easier, to say, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and walk? 6 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house. 7 And he arose, and departed to his house. 8 But when the multitudes saw it, they marvelled, and glorified God, which had given such power unto men.


The Theme Is Faith


Luther:
  1. The theme of this Gospel is the great and important article of faith, called “the forgiveness of sins”, which, when rightly understood, makes an honest Christian, and gives eternal life. Therefore it is necessary in the Christian Church to teach this article diligently and unceasingly, so that we may learn to understand it clearly and distinctly. For this is the one great and difficult art of a Christian, where he will have enough to learn as long as he lives, so that he need not look for anything new, higher or better.

This Gospel sermon by Luther is so important for people to read carefully, because he equates faith with forgiveness, as he does in other sermons and in all his work.

We can emphasize forgiveness or faith, but we cannot separate them, as if there were forgiveness without faith. Strangely – people do emphasize faith by itself, saving faith without a real object. That is common today. Just to have faith in something – an ultimate commitment or regard. Nothing vague is ever going to offend people. Faith in Jesus as the Son of God, the Savior of the world – that will offend many.

KJV Matthew 9:1 And he entered into a ship, and passed over, and came into his own city. 2 And, behold, they brought to him a man sick of the palsy, lying on a bed: and Jesus seeing their faith said unto the sick of the palsy;

Lenski:
Matthew is acquainted with all the details recorded by Mark and by Luke but concentrates on the vital points of the story. The exclamation “lo” hints at the fact that this was not an ordinary case of bringing a sick man to Jesus. He was lowered through the roof by four of his friends because the throng in and around the home of Jesus was too dense to admit penetration. On the disease of paralysis compare 8:6. The faith that Jesus saw manifested itself plainly enough. It was more than the ordinary faith which sought help of Jesus; it was a faith strong, persistent, inventive enough to discover the most unusual way of placing the sick man before Jesus. Why “their faith” should exclude the faith of the paralytic, as some assert, is hard to see. Surely, his friends did not bring him against his will, and surely, he must have consented to be lowered through the roof. It is true that Jesus healed some who had no faith at the moment and waited for faith to follow the healing; but no man’s sins are forgiven without faith being present in his heart. Instead of ruling out the faith of the paralytic, we must credit him with stronger faith than that of his friends. They may have had faith only in the power of Jesus to heal miraculously. This paralytic felt that he suffered from a greater ailment than paralysis, and thus he came to Jesus with his burden.
Not a word is uttered by either the paralytic or his friends. More eloquent than words is the prostrate form lowered through the ceiling to the feet of Jesus, interrupting his teaching in the packed house. As a true καρδιογνώστης Jesus sees all that is involved in this sufferer’s case and also all that it will mean for the present assembly and for all future time. First the soul, then the body. With the greatest tenderness Jesus absolves this sufferer’s soul. Men saw only his bodily affliction, Jesus saw the guilt and the contrition in the man’s heart. “Cheer up,” the present imperative θάρσει, takes away the gloom and the discouragement from the man’s heart and puts courage and happiness in its place. The address τέκνον, “child,” is far more tender and gentle than “son”; it is like a mother’s loving embrace. Jesus actually enters into this man’s heart and condition with the master-touch of his love.
Lenski, R. C. H.: The Interpretation of St. Matthew's Gospel. Minneapolis, MN. : Augsburg Publishing House, 1961, S. 355.

--

The miracle begins with faith and love. The friends of the sick man had faith in Jesus, faith in His divine power to heal. In love, they brought the poor man to Jesus. But faith made them bold. Instead of being intimidated by the crowds, they took their friend up on the roof, opened it up, and let him down below to be healed.

Needless to say, the sick man also had faith in Jesus. This is shown in his willingness to go along. How many people in need of care have said, “You won’t get me into the hospital.” Or – “You won’t get me to have an operation.” That is common. And taking him on the roof to lower him down? That could only happen with a willing person.

We have a warm, encouraging picture of a community of faith. The men with the muscles and faith brought their friend to Jesus. The sick man believed and received a double-miracle: forgiveness and healing.

As Lenski observed, some have said the friends believed but the sick man did not. That is quite absurd. Jesus, as God, knew the thoughts and intents of people without asking. He knew what the opponents were thinking without asking. Since Jesus always commended faith in Him, His absolution was a way of saying, “Because you believe, you are forgiven and healed.”

Forgiveness came first. “Be of good cheer.” What makes us heavy-hearted, worried, and sluggish? Lack of trust in the goodness of God does that to us. The Holy Spirit condemns our lack of faith in Jesus, when we ask, “Why are all the crooks and idiots doing so well and I can barely scrape by? Why not some rewards on this side of the line?”

When the greatest miracle of all is given to us – forgiveness of sin – we are cheerful and eager to go about our work. We no longer hear Satan accusing us or opponents mocking us. We realize that the Hero is on our side to defend us and help us in all trials.

As Luther observed, we can learn from our pet dogs. They always expect the best. They can ask 10 times in a row and be turned down. They ask 10 more times. And they grin and wag their tales. Treasure, our oldest, is a Sheltie-Border Collie mix. She comes out to the kitchen and breaks into a big smile, one so big that she makes a noise with her mouth as she opens it up. And she stares up with utter trust and love. She sends telepathic signals to the others if there is a good haul of chicken, or cheese, or stinky meat. (Stinky meat sends them in bouncing paroxysm of joy. Liverwurst.)

Chris tried to claim that she follows the same rule, “Always Be Closing. Always ask.” I said, “No, they always assume a yes.” She said, “I do too.” Maybe, but human modify that and adjust for difficulties. Dogs never do. Their trust is infinite and based upon our inherent goodness whether we have that or not.

God is inherently good, but our trust wavers, and we stop asking. James said, “You do not have because you do not ask.” That has been perverted by the prosperity salesmen, but it means something far more significant than that. Monica prayed for the conversion of her son Augustine. She never stopped asking, assuming God would take care of it. In his maturity, as a famous pagan orator, Augustine was converted by the Word of God. He had inklings of faith, but resisted completely up to that point when he heard children singing a song, “Take and read.” He picked up the New Testament and read.

After reading the following passage, ‘All shadows of doubt were dispelled’:
‘Not in riots or in drunken parties, not in eroticism and indecencies, not in strife and rivalry, but put on the Lord Jesus Christ and make no provision for the flesh in its lusts.’ (Rom. 13:13-14)
When my FB friends ask me to pray for someone they know, I post a prayer on their thread. Some people respond, “I am sending positive thoughts your way.” That is cheaper and faster than a telegram, but it is better to trust in God and ask Him. Recently a beloved only son was healed from a bad head injury. The father asked for prayers. I prayed for him on the thread. The boy recovered and his father thanked God for the healing.
Trust in God encourages trust in God, because it is invariably linked with the Word, which plants faith in our hearts and sustains that faith. In fact, faith is alive in us (or dying) and grows when it is nurtured by the Word. Our souls are fed by the Word or starved by a lack of the Word. John 15:1-10 is clear on that.
Faith and forgiveness are together because that is God’s plan. They are not separated. Faith, forgiveness, the Word, the Gospel, grace, prayer. They are not individual units to be torn apart from each other, but integrated parts of God’s plan.



3 And, behold, certain of the scribes said within themselves, This man blasphemeth.

This illustrates what happens the moment the Word takes hold. The opposition, led by Satan, is immediately angered and strikes out to destroy the Gospel. The scribes were correct in thinking that this forgiveness comes only from God, but they were not correct in saying it was blasphemy.


12. For this reason the greatest skill and intelligence is needed to grasp and understand this righteousness, and in our hearts and before God rightly to distinguish it from the above mentioned outward righteousness. For this is, as has been said, the skill and the wisdom of the Christian, but it is so high and great that even all the beloved Apostles could not speak enough of it; and yet it meets the painful misfortune that no art is mastered as soon as this.

There is no greater theme for a preacher than the grace of God and the forgiveness of sin, yet we are such wicked people, that, when we have once heard or read it, we think we know it, are immediately masters and doctors, keep looking for something greater, as though we had done everything, and thus we made new factions and division.

13. I have now been teaching and studying this subject with all diligence for many years (more than any one of those who imagine they know it all), in preaching, writing and reading, yet I cannot boast of having mastered it and am glad that I still remain a pupil with those who are just beginning to learn. For this reason I must admonish and warn all such as want to be Christians, both teachers and pupils, that they guard themselves against such shameful delusion and surfeit, and understand that this subject is most difficult and the greatest art that can be found upon earth; so that even Paul had to confess and say ( 2 Corinthians 9:15) that it is an unspeakable gift, that is, one which cannot be described among men with words so that they may regard it as highly and dearly as it really is in itself.

14. The reason for this is, that man’s understanding cannot get beyond this external piety of works, and cannot comprehend the righteousness of faith; but, the greater and more skillful this understanding is, the more it confines itself to works and rests upon them.

--

4 And Jesus knowing their thoughts said, Wherefore think ye evil in your hearts? 5 For whether is easier, to say, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and walk? 6 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house. 7 And he arose, and departed to his house. 8 But when the multitudes saw it, they marvelled, and glorified God, which had given such power unto men.

The alternatives come from God rather than man. Wherever someone invents an inner righteousness, worked by man, the major miracle is forgotten.

I heard a talk on self-esteem (against my will) at a business meeting. That was portrayed as the cure, if only everyone could be built up by these secular methods. And yet the speaker needed more help than the rest of the speakers put together.

This is really a great teaching lesson, to show us that giving this man health was the same as giving him absolution. Both began with the Word of God and both were received in faith.


Beware the Magisterial Use of Reason, Which Grasps the Wrong End of the Torch



rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "Kilcrease Uses Classic Romanism To Promote UOJ":

Any arguments that are not Scripture-based are bound to engage in the magisterial use of reason. Amateur philosophers and rationalists like to be masters of the conversation stopping cliche. They like to have their "gotcha moment" where you are caught off guard.

***

GJ - Luther--remember him from last year's Reformation service?--was well trained in the law and Medieval philosophy. He could use philosophical arguments, and he did so when countering Medieval philosophy. However, he always relied on the Word of God as judge of all books and all human reason.

When the leaders of this generation grabbed the torch from the previous one, they tried to prove true Lutheranism was passed to them. But they grabbed the wrong end. Biblical, Means of Grace doctrine was present in the Synodical Conference, but the radicals chose to avoid that for UOJ. They took the worst from their precious Brief Statement of 1932, because it served their purposes. Lutheran doctrine got in the way of unionism, social activism, and Enthusiasm - all isms, in fact.

Holy Spirit or Catholic Philosophy?
I have been astounded by the number of times one post has been used in the last few months. It is already the second most popular in the last two years, with 6715 page-views..

9593
6715

"The Holy Spirit teaches man better than all the books; He teaches him to understand the Scriptures better than he can understand them from the teaching of any other; and of his own accord he does everything God wills he should, so the Law dare make no demands upon him."

Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 280. Pentecost Sunday John 14:23-31.   

Therefore, Luther was opposed to letting Aristotle control the categories of discussion about the Christian faith.

One can substitute the "Word of God" for the "Holy Spirit" in the above quotation, because the Spirit and the Word always work together. The Word is clear, easy to understand, and powerful in its effect, always accomplishing God's purpose and always prospering in that effect.

The SynCons are rattled and angry because many people are using the Word of God to defeat their obnoxious teaching and junkyard behavior. The UOJ Enthusiasts want to draw the debate back into their invented categories, dazzling everyone with their ability to prance around their own contradictions. They imagine sarcasm is wit, that verbal abuse is exegesis. 

Magisterial versus Ministerial Use of Reason
No one is inherently superior in any discussion, because the Word of God is the ruling norm.

As Dr. Lito Cruz observed, from his experience in philosophy, logic, and Roman Catholicism, anyone can use philosophy to claim anything. Randall Schultz pointed out, above, that the philosophical gambit is a clear sign that the writer has abandoned the Word of God as the norm.

The ministerial use of reason places man's ability to understand and argue in the service of the Word, rather than judging the Word. Reason is not the master (magister) but the servant (minister) of the Scriptures.

UOJ Enthusiasts say, "We teach justification by faith better, because the Gospel rests upon justification without faith. You must use our newly invented categories to be one with us."


Saturday, October 13, 2012

Calov Repudiates the UOJ Position, As Robert Preus Demonstrated in Justification and Rome

Given this statement quoted by Robert Preus,
should we assume that Calov repudiated his own clear statement
about justification by faith?

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Cannot Spell, Cannot Write, Cannot Grasp Justifica...":

That quote on Bellarmine and Calov is spurious. Marquart and Kilcrease are painting their own spin on the debate between Calov and Bellarmine.

What Calov was speaking about is the real-ness of the justification because... because... because of the Gospel because... because it is a Promise.

Even Marquart quotes Calov in his paper but Marquart puts his own spin on it...

[Justification] is the object of faith in that it is offered by God in the Gospel; it is the effect [of faith], to put it thus, in so far as grace having been apprehended by faith, the forgiveness of sins happens to us by that very act.

This is what Calov says, so says Marquart. This has to be checked for accurate quotation. Marquart said he took this from Calov's Commentary on the Apology of Augsburg.

At any rate a careful re-reading of Calov would reveal that since it is an offer, the justification of the person only happens upon faith. It does not thereby mean that the justification is already accomplished for the sinner before faith and it has already been conferred to him like what the UOJers think. Otherwise why would Calov call it an offer?

I hope people catch my sense.

LPC

***

GJ - Jack Kilcrease appeals to Paul McCain because the CPH blogger is no more advanced in English than his instructor. Both write, spell, and argue at the high school level - not the Moline High of the 1960s, but current public high schools. I know that from teaching writing to over 1,000 incoming university students.

Moreover, both UOJ Enthusiasts argue at a junior high level.

I will stick with the Intrepids' two-source argument. We have the Scriptures and the Confessions. One is the revelation of the Holy Spirit, clear enough for any person. The other is the witness to that truth from the finest Biblical teachers of Christendom:

  • Luther, 
  • Melanchthon, 
  • Chemnitz, 
  • Chytraeus, and 
  • Selnecker.


The only UOJ taught by a Lutheran before the Age of Pietism was from Samuel Huber, who was repudiated and fired by P. Leyser and the Wittenberg theologians.


Kilcrease Uses Classic Romanism To Promote UOJ

How is this different from quoting Edward Preuss favorably
or featuring the Miraculous Lactation of Mary?
McCain does both, while promoting the Apocrypha even more than his gun collection.


LPC has left a new comment on your post "Comments from Readers about the Delusions of Jack ...":

A. Berean,

This is classic Romanism. This is how Romanists have justified the doctrine of the immaculate conception of the Virgin Mary.

They said it is not explicitly there but the Biblical authors intended it to be there. Hehehe. Treat the Bible as a work of art, where a human being does not fully know the impact of his work.

However, the Scripture is not the work of man but the work of God, if God wanted to teach it, he would have stated it.

More argument from silence.

LPC

***

Fill 'er up.
The inset is from Paul McCain's "Lutheran" blog.
The painting is The Miraculous Lactation of Mary.
St. Bernard is the recipient.


GJ - As I wrote before, McCain and Kilcrease and Scaer are the not so closeted Romanists and UOJ Enthusiasts of the LCMS.

Dr. Lito Cruz pointed out a well known tendency among the Roman Catholics. Their training is in philosophy rather than the Scriptures. If they take courses in the Scriptures, they follow the rationalists of the Protestant Left.

Philosophy can be used to engage in clever word tricks. UOJ Lutherans like to say, "If I am to believe in forgiveness, it has to be given to me first before I can believe in it. Therefore the entire world has been forgiven."

That argument came from Edward Preuss, who joined the Roman Catholic Church and argued for Roman dogma. He said, "Give me the documents and I can prove anything." (Fuerbringer) Indeed, but proving something in philosophy is not the same as teaching the Holy Spirit's wisdom in the Word.

Preuss also used this title for his odious booklet - The Justification of Sinners. There is nothing wrong with that by itself, but he meant - The Declaration of Forgiveness for Every Pagan and Atheist in the World.

Cascione is another UOJ Enthusiast
and counselor to Herman Otten.


Comments from Readers about the Delusions of Jack Kilcrease -
Paul McCain's Theological Expert



LPC has left a new comment on your post "Cannot Spell, Cannot Write, Cannot Grasp Justifica...":

Dr. Greg.

I read this from Jack Kilcrease --- Part of Rydecki's problem is that he does not understand that the word "justification" is being used differently when applied to OJ and SJ.

Is Kilcrease being serious? Aren't theologians also good at philosophy? I could not believe this guy ever said this.

I could not stop LOLing. I am now ROFLOLing.

Jack does not know what an equivocation is. Ohhhh, now I get it ha.... IT IS NOW RYDECKI's fault because Rydecki does not want to follow the equivocation on justification followed byf UOJers eyh?

A while back some moons ago, I alluded to Jack that I am concern about what his students are learning from him.

I won't recommend people go to his university to study.

LPC




LPC has left a new comment on your post "Do Not Play Games with Words - Or With the Word of...":

Yeah, Jack Kilcrease just admitted in his post that he and fellow UOJers practice equivocation.

We all know that but to be bold enough to "justify" themselves in their equivocation is not something I have seen so far.

People, equivocation is not a good thing.

I refer people to the book by Irving Copi, a classic in Logic 101, p.76-77.

Really UOJers should stop posting and stop arguing at this point, they should not go out of their homes until they have read this book on logic.




Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Do Not Play Games with Words - Or With the Word of...":

LPC -

I admire your courage to visit the Kilcrease site. I have not been there and never intend to do so.

But, be that as it may; I can't help but think that after this published Ichabod comment posting (of yours) about Kilcrease's self-admitted "equivocation," - he will now kilcrease that posted comment of his.

Nathan M. Bickel
www.thechristianmessage.org
www.moralmatters.org




A. Berean has left a new comment on your post "Cannot Spell, Cannot Write, Cannot Grasp Justifica...":

What about this statement: "Rydecki seems to be operating with the rather odd perspective that the language set down by the Formula of Concord is authoritative for all time. "
Why wouldn't it be? "we have no intention of yielding aught of the eternal, immutable truth of God for the sake of temporal peace, tranquillity, and unity (which, moreover, is not in our power to do)." - FC, Election.

So then..the language set down by the scriptures might be authoritative, but the doctrine drawn from them can and has changed???

Synod Bullies - The Problem and Solution - From Pastor Nathan Bickel



Out of petty spite, WELS got rid of their own mother church.


Ichabod –

Regarding the WELS bureaucracy intimidation and bullying:

The WELS meddling synodical bureaucracy will make war upon its own synod's clergy by acts of intimidation. These buggers know the nature of denominational clergy dependence. [After all, WELS clergy have their pension benefits vested in the WELS system] Hence, these meddlers will foist their non Scriptural dead weight upon clergy to attempt to drown out WELS pastors who correctly teach Scripture's justification by faith alone.

I propose a simple solution to this synodical bureaucratic bullying:

1) Parish pastors need to make it clear to those meddling into the local congregation, that there is no forum for them, unless it is granted to them [by vote] by the congregational assembly.

2) If such audience is given to any WELS bureaucrats whether it be circuit counselors; district presidents or the synodical president; strict guidelines will have to be observed. Should any synodical non parish pastor official be granted a forum either with the local parish pastor and / or with the pastor and his congregation, the following prime guidelines will have to be observed:

   a) No pastor or his congregation shall be bullied into answering synodical litmus questions; especially those questions which demand, a "Yes" or "No."

   b) An acceptable answer given by a pastor to synodical bureaucracy will be an answer in response to a trick and confining question, as Jesus Himself posed to the religious hypocrites of His day. Here, following, is an example:

Matthew 21:23-27:

"And when he was come into the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came unto him as he was teaching, and said, By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority?

And Jesus answered and said unto them, I also will ask you one thing, which if ye tell me, I in like wise will tell you by what authority I do these things.

The baptism of John, whence was it? from heaven, or of men? And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him?

But if we shall say, Of men; we fear the people; for all hold John as a prophet.
 
And they answered Jesus, and said, We cannot tell. And he said unto them, Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things." -  Matthew 21:23-27

Furthermore if such a forum is granted to any synodical official - especially on the issue of universal objective justification; that synodical official will be first expected to explain Scripture's teaching of justification by faith as set forth in the New Testament books of Romans, Galatians and Hebrews 11. They will be required to cough up their understanding of what Scripture intends in Romans chapter 4.

The general Number 1 rule of thumb for a Christian congregation and its pastor:  Treat synodical bureaucracy as you would a Jehovah Witness who wraps on your home's door. Do not by any means give them a foot in the door. Treat them as you would; wolves to the flock.

Finally, I offer the aforementioned advice in light of my own experience. I (regretfully and mistakenly) allowed a forum to the then Michigan District Vice President Erwin Kostizen to be District President, John Hein’s forerunner, into my parish’s church council meeting. He was the proverbial “Jehovah Witness” who gained a destructive cancerous foothold.

Even before the District had completed their congregational upheaval and scattering the sheep (as it did not stand by one of its own parish pastors) DP Erwin Kostizen was hot to trot out his District papers urging me to sign, thus forever legally shutting me up to share this LCMS district debacle. I stood by my desire to allow the congregation to set forth the terms of my severance package, as I resigned under the hounding stress for the sake of my family.

I encourage any WELS or any other Lutheran pastors:  Don’t by any means, sign synodical legal papers. Don’t put yourself into a future gag position. Rather, walk away and keep your integrity. And, resist the devilish charge that you as parish pastor are the one who is scattering the sheep. If you have been faithful in the charge of your under-Shepherd duties, it is church hierarchy which does the nasty in scattering the sheep.  [Jeremiah 23:1-2]

The whole situation was a bitter pill for me to swallow; and, it had its subsequent fall-out. My continued regret is that I was too nice and tolerant. I remember telling my congregation the last voter’s assembly:  [Paraphrase]: “If you allow yourselves to be led about by District and Synod, you won’t be a congregation in 50 years!” [I said this in 1996] While I was pastor of this small rural congregation; the Sunday attendance averaged about between 90 and 120. Now, the attendance is down to about 40-45 and the average age is about 60 years old. The Michigan District has not granted this congregation a pastor of its own in years. They are forced to share a pastor with St. John’s, 5 miles down the road. The church parsonage is rented out.

I mention the above, as church hierarchy most often plays the holier-than-thou. It comes in as the savior of a congregation, gains a foothold and then meddles in cloaked sheep fashion when it is actually playing the devil’s wolf.

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org

www.moralmatters.org

Jack Must Kilcrease, Paul Must Increase




http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2012/10/cannot-spell-cannot-write-cannot-grasp.html

Few have the honor of seeing their last names turned into verbs in the Icha-slang Lexicon. Jack Kilcrease is one of them.

To kilcrease means to erase a comment, a post, or an entire blog. Another UOJ Enthusiast, Tim Glende, is known for kilcreasing the same blog twice, his other blog once. Blog me once, shame on you; blog me thrice,  what is your problem?

I hated to spoil Jack's immaculate post about UOJ, but he has no conception about Lutheran theology. How could he? Like his bosom buddies Paul McCain and David Scaer, he had an exceptionally parochial education. McCain went to a Roman Catholic high school and loved it, matriculating later at Missouri's blue collar seminary, Ft. Wayne. Either way, he was with Holy Mother Church.

David Scaer never left the confines of the LCMS, earning an in-house seminary degree, what they used to call an STD, except Martin Stephan ruined it for everyone. Scaer likes to posture as a priest one minute, an ELCA friend the next, an honored guest at an ELS gathering later.

Jack was born to the purple, as far as WELS is concerned. His father was a WELS pastor, a graduate of Mequon. Did the father long to join ELCA, which was largely created by the WELS Watertown apostate, Richard Jungkuntz? We can only guess - but we do know that Jack earned two degrees at ELCA schools - Luther College and Luther Seminary. He became a Jesuit in training at Marquette, finishing a PhD. He moonlights at an all-ELCA online seminary (not accredited) while serving as an adjunct at a Dominican girls college.

Kilcrease, McCain, and Scaer are UOJ Stormtroopers. Instead of teaching the Word of God, they utter philosophical nonsense.

Cannot Spell, Cannot Write, Cannot Grasp Justification by Faith:
Jack Kilcrease Calls Himself a Theologian of the Church




From Intellectualoid Jack Kilcrease, 
Theologian in Residence, 
Our Lady of the Spanish Inquisition Girls Academy

SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2012


The Rydecki Situation


As many of you probably know, Rev. Paul Rydecki was suspended by the WELS for his rejection of objective justification this last week.  Generally I haven't commented on this because I thought that other people would do that for me.  The fact of the matter is that that hasn't happened and so I feel a need as a theologian within the Church to do this.

Why?  Specifically because I consider Rydecki to be dangerous theologically.  He's dangerous because unlike someone like Gregory Jackson, Rydecki has a lot of ecclesiastical support.  People who (sic) I know disagree with him theologically wouldn't say a word against him on Facebook or on other blogs.  Unlike Jackson, who is generally viewed as a dishonest, self-serving, and quasi-comical figure, Rydecki is a serious and honest person, who has earned a lot of capital by opposing Church-growth and contemporary worship in WELS.  Who could argue with that?  Also, unlike Jackson, Rydecki states his theological position in a calm and intelligent manner, rather than by lying about the position of his opponents or by making up falsehood (sicabout them personally.  For this reason, he gives a greater credibility to the rejection (sic) OJ than a person who's (sic) idea of an argument is to cut-and-paste a million short and uncontextualized quotations from the Book of Concord onto a banner with the head of some synodical official or theologian photo-shopped onto the body of a baby, animal, clown, or character from Star Wars. [GJ - Poor Jack asked for a Photoshop of him and never got one. His catechumen, Pope Paul the Plagiarist, said he welcomed more Photoshops. Can't please the UOJ Hive.]

In order to respond to what Rydecki is specifically teaching, here is his own response to his suspension: http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2012/10/suspended-from-wels-why.html

In response to his response, I have couple (sicobservations:

1. Rydecki seems to be operating with the rather odd perspective that the language set down by the Formula of Concord is authoritative for all time.  He also says something similar in the intro he wrote the the Samuel Huber book.  The first question is: why?  Obviously the Lutheran Confessions themselves show terminological evolution (justification in the Apology can mean either justification proper or sanctification, sacrament is defined differently in different documents- so the question of how many sacraments is answer (sicdifferent (sic) in different contexts- 4, the Apology; 3 the Catechisms; 2 the FC!).  The Bible is the same way.  Paul thinks of faith primary (sicas something directed to the past (what Jesus did on the cross for us)- Hebrews has that aspect, but then also includes eschatological expectation in this as well- what Paul would probably call this (sic) "hope."  Melanchthon and Calvin easily reconciled Paul with James by pointing out that what Paul means by "justification" is appearing righteous before God, whereas James is talking about appearing righteous (i.e. showing evidence of our faith) before other people!  The early Reformers understood what a lot of people (especially in the WELS, it would seem!) don't seem to get: Doctrines are concepts.  Concepts can be expressed in a lot of different ways.  Just because a word isn't present, doesn't mean that a concept isn't present.  Remember that Luther never uses the word "justification" in the Small Catechism.  Nevertheless, he teaches the doctrine on every page.

2. Nevertheless, why should we use different words in different situations?  Why doesn't the Church just decide on certain terms and keep with them forever?  The fact of the matter is that theological terminology develops over time in order to deal with issues at hand. Someone who didn't say homoousia in the 2nd century wasn't a heretic, but after 324 AD they (sicwere. The same goes for objective justification. The terminology of OJ and SJ is intended to deal with problems that developed in the mid-17th century and afterwards. Pleads to maintain a certain primitive terminology are problematic, in that language only functions appropriately in a particular context. Once new controversies arise, the Church must generate new language to deal with the problem either 1. To clarify certain points (think "nature" vs. "person" by the Cappadocians after 324). 2. Heretics take over certain language- for example, the Reformed use "this is my body"- hence in order to keep the true meaning, we must say "this is the true body of Christ" etc.  For this reason, what Rydecki fails to see is that innovation of theological terminology is necessary to maintain conceptual orthodoxy.  Old terms in new contexts will not function and therefore promote heresy.  If the Cappadocians had, for example, continued to insist that the anathema at the end of the original Nicene Creed had set down terminology for all time ("Let anyone who says that the Son is of a different hypostasis or ousia than the Father be anathema!") then in the new theological context of post-Nicene Christianity, they might have rightly been accused of Modalism.  Neither would they have been able to make the clear conceptual distinction between "person" and "nature" which ultimately made Nicene orthodoxy conceptually coherent in the minds of many people.  

This is Robert Preus' citation of Calov from Justification and Rome,
which papist Jack Kilcrease has not read.

3. What then was the situation that promoted the Church to use the terms OJ and SJ?  The terms seem to develop somewhat later.  Nevertheless, the sainted Kurt Marquart pointed out that the clear conceptual delineation of the terms came for the first time from Abraham Calov in response to the Catholic apologist Robert Bellarmine.  Bellarmine pointed out that justification by faith was contradictory because the person was supposed to believe that they were justified when they (sic) in fact weren't actually justified until they had faith. Abraham Calov responded to this in his commentary on the Augsburg Confession by pointing out that the word of God's grace is objectively true and pre-exists our faith. Actually, since it causes it, logically it must be objectively prior to our subjective appropriation of it (sic  four it's). Moreover, if one did not accept that it was objectively true in this way, faith wouldn't be a receptive organ , but a condition that somehow makes justification real. Hence, as Bellarmine pointed out, we wouldn't preach "your sins are forgiven for the sake of Jesus" but rather "if" you believe, then they will be. The gospel becomes a law!  

4. Part of Rydecki's problem is that he does not understand that the word "justification" is being used differently when applied to OJ and SJ.  When applied to OJ, the word merely means for God to pronounce a particular verdict on the human race.  It does not mean for them to receive it.  In the context of SJ, "justification" means to have receive that verdict.  That is, to appropriate it.  Because a check is written (OJ) does not mean that it is necessarily cashed (SJ).  Because I have beer in my basement, doesn't make me drunk.  His argument that having two justification (sicdoesn't make any sense because if the world was (sicalready justified at the cross and empty tomb why does it need to be justified again by faith (an old Jackson favorite as well!) is incoherent because it assumes that the word is being used the same way in both contexts (sic - run on and incoherent).  When one realizes that this argument rest (sic) on a very flat understanding of language (words mean the same things in every context) then the argument completely falls apart.
Rydecki is too ridged.

5. Lastly: Part of Rydecki's problem is that he tends to think about these issues in overly ridged (sic - hilariousand abstract terms.  In other words, he thinks of OJ as an abstract and general relationship that God somehow has with all human beings, rather than a description of what God does under his various masks within creation and through the means of grace.  For this reason, he finds it odd and incoherent to say that God in general and in some abstract sense is reconciled with the world when there's still wrath.   Much of this I suspect could be remedied by a good reading of 20th century Luther scholarship, which I don't believe many of the anti-OJ advocate have done (Jackson once admitted that he hadn't even read standard works like Paul Althaus' The Theology of Martin Luther- quite shocking!).  God doesn't interact with the world uniformly, but takes on different masks (larva Dei). In his mask of law and political order, he isn't a forgiving presence. When he wears the mask of the police officer and throws me against the hood of the car and hand cuffs me, that's not absolution. The point though is that when I come to the means of grace, God is a presence and a word that is already real and actual as forgiveness. God as he is present in the word of absolution that he gave the Church has already forgiven me objectively.  When I leave the sphere of the law and enter into the sphere of the gospel (i.e. the means of grace) then I merely enter into that sphere where God is already real as grace.  My faith doesn't actualize God as forgiving.  If it did, then it would be a requirement and not a gift.  Nevertheless, if I don't look for him in the means of grace, then I won't find his already forgiving presence.  Rather, I will find him as wrath, law, and hiddenness outside of them.  When it comes to grace and wrath, God in general, above the spheres of his dual activities (law and grace), cannot really be known.  Hence God is "hidden" above his masks, as Luther repeatedly states. 


---


http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2012/10/jack-kilcrease-as-humpty-dumpty.html

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2012/10/humpty-dumpty-threatens-in-private.html