Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Why Are ELS Pastors So Timid?



Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul, ash nazg thrakatulûk, agh burzum-ishi krimpatul. One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
Tolkien, Lord of the Rings.


One ELS member answered why ELS pastors are so timid and afraid to speak out about anything. "They all want to be on a board."

They all know about retaliation.

Fear can work two ways. Currently almost all pastors are afraid of the officials they elected to high office. The officials should be afraid of the pastors, but they are not. The apostate officials know they can use the British method of divide and conquer to make their lackeys kiss the episcopal ring (and pretend to enjoy it).

No, I will not explore the Latin word for ring and Freudian implications thereof.

The ELS pastors get their jollies by criticizing WELS in private, doing nothing in public. The LCA masterfully took care of dissent by having public forums about their disastrous policies. People could spout off about having a gay activist speaking at the next youth rally. Inevitably, someone did. All the shouting took place unofficially. When the votes came, no one had anything to say.

***

Norman Teigen has left a new comment on your post "Why Are ELS Pastors So Timid?":

Well, I am an ELS layman, and it does seem that ELS pastors have been reluctant to speak on many occasions. I know that when my late father's book, The Lord's Supper in the Theology of Martin Chemnitz was published, the official line of the Synod was not to disturb WELS who felt that it was troublesome.

The ELS had just come in to the Schwan money and the feeling was that it was best not to rock the boat. Rocking the boat was synonymous with differing from WELS.

My father's book was savaged by the ELS because it was felt that the money was more important than the theology.

Fortunately, it was able to survive and now it is available from LOGIA at no cost.

As one pastor told me once, most of the synods get in trouble when the young guys go off to seminary and learn modern theology. In the ELS, he said, the problem is with the older guys.

The older guys thought that all of their preaching was in vain and it sure would be nice if some cash could come in to confirm the validity of their work. The cash did come from Schwan Foundation. It was on the same conceptual level as a miracle in the desert. From that time forward this pastor refers to the synod as the $ynod.

***

rlschultz has left a new comment on your post "President Schroeder (WELS)":

The apostates within the WELS stand condemned by their testimony and their own actions. As you have stated, Dr. Jackson, this is what really defines them. SP Schroeder seems sincere enough in his short time as president. Some of the laity within the WELS are also sincere. But, many appear to be naive to the real root of the problem, which is not trusting in the efficacy of the word. Far too many lay members trust the synodical leadership to always do right by them. Therefore, all synodical offerings have automatic legitimacy. The next one in my area will be a "Personal Witnessing Workshop". Like the Church and Change Conference, well intentioned members participate because they think that they are learning how to do evangelism. Implicit in all of this is the underlying theme of using the right technique or methods, whether that is in "personal witnessing", worship, evangelism in order to reach the unbeliever. Also, some of these conferences and workshops have their share of "WELS celebrities" who lead them. Perhaps a more fitting term might be "living saints", such as St. Jeske, St. Sorum, St. Kelm, et al. It is more than just a tolerance by members. It is celebrity worship. Until serious doctrinal discussions are brought forward, the falling away within the WELS will only get worse. The aping of the mega-churches continues within the WELS when church growth methods are always given a positive image in the WELS connection videos. New and innovative forms of ministry seem to be the focus. Once again, the emphasis is upon technique. My guess is that the workshops and conferences employ a loose and shabby use of scripture, like the style of the Purpose Driven Life.


It is possible to speculate, as some have in the ELS, that honest discussion by a pastor means that he will be called only to places like East Overshoe Lutheran Church.

In a worldly sense, I suppose, one could say that some parishes in the ELS pay a living wage, while others can't afford to pay an honest salary for a pastor.

The ELS is made up of many small parishes. I would presume that the four or five largest ELS parishes might pay the equivalent of a comparable WELS/LC-MS/ELCA salary. The other small parishes will find it difficult to make ends meet.

The idea of living in poverty while preaching is probably practiced more in the ELS than it is in the Benedictine order. That such a state of poverty could be used as a public weapon to enforce conformity is not something that one would hope to be true.

An examination of any recent ELS Synod report clearly reveals that the funding of the President's salary is firmly established by a generous grant. The ELS may flounder, spiritually or financially, but the President's office will stay afloat.

I don't mean to disparage the current president of the ELS because his family and mine are long-standing friends. I do question the wisdom of the ELS presidency as it is so funded.

President Schroeder (WELS)




I believe that’s true about the blessings that God gives us through this extended spiritual family that we call the Wisconsin Synod. We may not consciously think of how God blesses us in our synod. We may tend to focus on what’s wrong instead of rejoicing in what’s right. We sometimes allow those outside of our synod to define us and characterize us. We may become apologetic, defensive, maybe even sometimes a little embarrassed when it comes to our synod and what it represents. And failing to appreciate what God graciously does for us, we miss opportunities to fully benefit from those blessings and to invite others to be part of this synod in which those blessings come to us.

Over the next year, it seems good for us to remember and to emphasize some of those blessings; to remind ourselves of what this synod stands for, what it does, and why we are a part of it. You’ve already seen a few hints of those reminders in the “Together” newsletter and in WELS Connection. In the January issue of Forward in Christ (p. 32), you’ll see the first in a series of columns summarizing those blessings, focusing on our identity: Who are we? Where does WELS stand? What is our synod for, as opposed to what we are against?

You will also see efforts to sharpen and define our synod’s identity as we work to improve the look and content of all WELS communications. Already we’ve begun to plan for the redesign our synod’s Web site, aiming to make it more usable for our members and more effective in communicating who we are to the outside world.


***

GJ - One reader asked, "Does he read Ichabod?"

I let WELS define WELS, and that definition is still pathetic at this time.


  1. The so-called conservatives remain too weak to knock the skin off a pudding.

  2. Wisconsin's effect upon the Little Sect on the Prairie has been to light the kindling around the martyr's feet during the disgraceful Moldstad purge.

  3. Church and Change has morphed from

    Banned-in-2005

    to
    Official-Recognition-and-Registration
    on the current WELS website. A parallel contradiction would be to have Herman Otten and Jack Cascione concelebrate the Eucharist with ELCA Bishop Mark Hanson at their next multi-cultural meeting.

All these toxic effects were cresting during the change from Gurgel to Schroeder. One person does not decide the image, fate, and message of synod, even a tiny and tinny one like WELS.

Two things have to be overcome for WELS to crawl out of its Fuller-Willow Creek hole:

1. Wisconsin has to be honest about issues, which is tough for pastors hazed by GA and raised in a climate of pathological dishonesty. For example, people were telling me Church and Change was a goner when I found the link on the official WELS website. They believed the lie until I gave them the actual link.
2. The conservatives (if any are left) have to rattle the cages as noisily as their apostate counterparts. The Left is good at shrieking when their icons are threatened. Conservatives are good at shirking their duties.

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant
Is a Remarkable Book



The Tree of Life, by Norma Boeckler


Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant is a remarkable book. At a time when doctrinal indifference is taught and practiced to varying degrees by all Lutheran Synods this book comes as a blessing from the Lord. For certainly we do not keep or teach His Word purely in and of ourselves but it is a gift from God given by grace through the Holy Spirit.

Pastor Gregory Jackson has appropriately addressed the similarities and differences between these doctrines of faith. They are presented clearly and without emotional emphasis by the author. Pastor Jackson remains consistent with his other writings by measuring every teaching by Scripture, the Lutheran Confessions and includes the scripturally faithful statements of our Church Fathers. This is the foundation which many in the churches and synods today are tearing down in favor of human reason, worldly success, personal relationships and temporary security.

I found his insights to be accurate and detailed concerning the doctrines covered and he thoroughly presents the origins and reasoning behind the false teachings being taught by Lutheran churches, Protestant denominations and the Roman Catholic Church. I believe he gave appropriate emphasis of the Reformed doctrines which are so prevalent in Lutheran churches and Catholic heresies as these speak to where we are today and where the world is heading.

In our day, when the ELS is removing churches from membership because they exercise the office of the keys in response to public sin, the WELS enthusiastically rejects the work of the Holy Ghost through promotion of Church Growth practices and the LCMS lunges headlong toward fellowship with the ELCA and Rome, it is especially important to understand the differences between true Biblical doctrines and the false doctrines of men. For as we daily draw nearer to the glorious return of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ we will continue to be tempted, by our own sinful flesh, Satan and the doctrines of false teachers, to abandon our only Rock and sure Foundation for the false security and comfort of widely accepted false doctrines. As apostate pastors, corrupt synod officials, blind church leaders and an unbelieving world continue their journey toward Rome and the Antichrist it will remain the responsibility of the orthodox Lutheran layman to discern the truth using Scripture and our Lutheran Confessions in order to remain faithful to Christ and by God’s grace endure to the end.

I highly recommend this book to everyone who has an interest in pure doctrine and even more so to those who don’t. But I would be remiss if I didn’t also recommend Pastor Jackson’s other exceptional books Jesus Priceless Treasure, Thy Strong Word and Liberalism: It’s Cause and Cure.

Brett Meyer

Sermon - Third Sunday in Advent



The Last Supper, by Norma Boeckler


KJV 1 Corinthians 4:1 Let a man so account of us, as of the ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God. 2 Moreover it is required in stewards, that a man be found faithful. 3 But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged of you, or of man's judgment: yea, I judge not mine own self. 4 For I know nothing by myself; yet am I not hereby justified: but he that judgeth me is the Lord. 5 Therefore judge nothing before the time, until the Lord come, who both will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts: and then shall every man have praise of God.

Stewards of the Mysteries of God

This advent epistle teaches us about the pastoral office in light of the coming of Christ. The season of Advent focuses on the birth of our Savior, but also our need to be always be ready for His return.

Someone may think, “Now he is only going to talk about pastors.” But let’s look at what the Holy Spirit is saying to us through Paul. He uses two parallel phrases, which help us, since one is equal to the other. The two phrases are “ministers of Christ” and “stewards of the mysteries of God.” We seldom use the term minister in the sense of the Scriptures. It did not mean “an ordained clergyperson” then, but a household servant. A minister of Christ is someone who serves Jesus the Lord and Savior. If someone comes to our home and Qwest is repairing a phone, no one thinks to say to the repairman, “Are you the head of the household?” The repairman does only what he is told to do. He may do a good job or a bad job, but he is not the owner of the house. He has a work order and fulfills what that order tells him to do.

God teaches us through Paul that the apostle himself had exactly the same role. He was a servant of Christ, not a tyrant over the believers. The phrase he used is the same we would use for accounting or an audit. “What am I?” says Paul. “Consider me a household servant of Jesus the Messiah.”

This is important, because the apostle’s role is defined as serving Christ. Paul had a responsibility toward all the congregations he served. Not everyone is called to serve in the role of preaching, as Luther wrote:

"All Christians serve God but all are not in office."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholaus Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VI, p. 65. 1 Corinthians 4:1-5.

The current trend among Lutheran synods would have us believe otherwise. I have a photo from the Wisconsin Synod showing the men and women from Martin Luther College (nee Dr. Martin Luther College). They are all listed as “future ministers.” In fact, the theme most often heard among the conservative Lutherans is that “everyone is a minister.” That is why I designed a web page, “Every dog a minister.” It makes as much sense.

In the broadest sense, every Christian has AN office. If a man is married and has children, his calling is to serve his wife and children according to the Scriptures. His office is not the same as that of a wife and a mother. Then too, the children also have an office or place in life, one appointed by God. The duties are clearly taught in the Small Catechism.

Luther often called pastoral work: “the preaching office” or Predigtamt. The person called by the Holy Spirit through the congregation has the responsibility to preach the Word of God faithfully. Someone may substitute for him, but he still has the responsibility. The pastor may sign a check (generally not a good idea) or help with the books (also to be avoided) but he is not the treasurer. That is not his office.

This does not keep the members from learning about Christian doctrine, debating Christian doctrine (with the proper attitude toward the norms of the Word and the Confessions), or sharing in the teaching that takes place. But they do not have the office, that is, the responsibility. The responsibility of the preaching office means absolute subordination of pastor to Christ. The phrase we use from The Lutheran Liturgy is: “called and ordained servant of the Word.” It can be seen as a restricting burden or as a joy. Lutheran ministers know that every result of the Word is God’s will, whether apparently good or bad. (We cannot and should not judge.) If he sees preaching as preaching his own personal opinions, or whatever research has shown to be effective, then he is not a servant of the Word and will be damned for his error and for the souls he has destroyed.

"Thus this text also strongly opposes all human doctrine; for since the Word of God is the light in a dark and gloomy place, the conclusion follows that all besides it is darkness. For if there were another light besides the Word, Peter would not have spoken as he did. Therefore look not to how gifted with reason they are who teach any other doctrine--however grandly they set it forth. If you cannot trace God's Word in it, then doubt not that it is mere darkness. And let it not disturb you at all that they say they have the Holy Spirit. How can they have God's Spirit if they do not have His Word? Wherefore they do nothing else but call darkness light and make the light darkness, as the prophet Isaiah says, in Isaiah 5:20."
Martin Luther, Commentary on Peter and Jude, ed. John N. Lenker, Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications, 1990, p. 248. 2 Peter 1:19.

If the same man told a cleaning crew to clean his house and they painted it purple and pink instead, he would be furious. Yet God tells him to teach the truth and a mere man substitutes his own ideas.

"Paul does not speak of opposing or antagonistic doctrines, but of those placed beside the true doctrine; they are additions, making divisions. Paul calls it a rival doctrine, an addition, an occasion of stumbling, an offense and a byway, when on establishes the conscience upon his own goodness or deeds. Now the Gospel is sensitive, complete and pre-eminent: it must be intolerant of additions and rival teachings."
Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 376. Romans 16:16-17.

The parallel phrase used by Paul is “stewards of the mysteries of God.” Once again, steward is a fine secular word never found in today’s English in the same way. A steward was a household manager.

KJV Luke 16:3 Then the steward said within himself, What shall I do? for my lord taketh away from me the stewardship: I cannot dig; to beg I am ashamed.

In that parable we can see that the household manager is supposed to do his job to benefit his lord, or he will be fired. He is being fired, in fact, so he makes friends with the men who owe his master money, so they will hire him. His master sees how clever he is and commends him. It is a strange parable, but we can see in the portrayal of the Lord/steward relationship that the steward is absolutely accountable to the master.

So the term “steward” is fairly obvious. But what are the “mysteries of God.” Some people have tried to create false parallels. This has nothing to do with the mystery religions of paganism. Also, the term mystery is not the same as sacrament. That is, the term is not limited to “sacrament.”

Mysteries apply to everything revealed by the Holy Spirit. The Trinity is a mystery revealed by God, not something we deduce by math or science or prove with logic. That is why we rely on the Word to convert people rather than reason and logic. A person without faith cannot see or understand the mysteries of God. That is why it is so important that the underling of Christ, the pastor, be a faithful household manager of these mysteries.

Can a pastor say to God, “While you were gone, I decided that evolution was better than Creation, a flow of ice better than the Flood. The 10 Commandments are a burden. I declared them obsolete. I am all Gospel. We are all Gospel. I will give Holy Communion, the sacrament you established through the death of Your Son, to anyone who strolls into my church, whether they believe it or not. God, I have a vision for my congregation. One day it will have 8,000 communicants. 8 THOUSAND. And our parking valet ministry will be known throughout the world.”

You are saying to yourselves, “He is making that up to prove a point.” No, I am stating the open and public confession of a WELS pastor who had the support of the district president, vice president, and the friendship of synodical leaders, even the mission board chairman. No effort was spared to protect his position and keep him in the pulpit. Finally, the members had to say, “You must retract your errors.” He said, “I will resign first.” The congregation responded, “Resignation accepted.” He was not a faithful steward. Nor were the synod officials. The members finally accepted their office, which is to discern the spirits, to judge between sound doctrine and evil doctrine.

Oh well, they got away with it for a long time. And everyone has forgotten. Except One.

"On that day every false teacher will wish that he had never been born and will curse the day when he was inducted into the sacred office of the ministry. On that day we shall see that false teaching is not the trifling and harmless matter that people in our day think it is."
C. F. W. Walther, The Proper Distinction between Law and Gospel, trans., W. H. T. Dau, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1928, p. 88.

So much is said by Paul about this very subject. He could not be judged by any man. He was not above it all. Ultimately what a minister has done can only be judged by God. Man looks at huge buildings, huge parking lots, and huge budgets, and says, “They are doing well.” God looks at the heart. We cannot do that. We can see certain outward characteristics. For instance, the most successful pastor, in the worldly sense, in Columbus, Ohio, was in the paper. A painter wanted the good reverend to pay for the painting of his mansion. The Pentecostal minister and his father held down the painter and beat him up, according to the news account. That suggests a lack of humility and honesty. But perhaps he will repent before he dies.

On the other hand, someone may be completely orthodox for many years and yet fall away from the faith before dying. Many temptations come along. Probably the obvious sins come after a loss of faith, but the obvious sins end the call. That is why we should not be hasty to judge. Liberals grow into the historic faith and we know many people trained properly fall away completely. I know a pastor who hated all the radical liberal tendencies of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. He joined the LCMS. Then later he joined the United Church of Christ, a group that makes the ELCA look staid and hidebound.

At the end, everyone will have his due praise from God. That is another unfair aspect of the Christian faith. The person who believes in Christ alone for his salvation does not have his sins held against him. They are wiped from the account books by the atoning death of Christ. The believers places all his trust in the great exchange made by Christ, who became sin (while without sin Himself) to give us His righteousness. The believer receives this blessing each and every day. His sins are forgiven and forgotten. God moves all believers to do good works to glorify His name. The motivation to follow God’s will and to do God’s will comes from God alone, yet God will praise believers for being His servants and doing His will, even though tainted by sin. The sin is set aside and the good works are rewarded. That is not fair. God is not fair. He is gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love.

The last verse is a great comfort for those believers who sacrifice a great deal, or endure great hardships, or patiently take on thankless jobs (such as being a mother). Nothing that belongs to God is highly regarded by the world. And yet God will praise these things in the end. He knows and he will reward people. And God will show how little He values what the world esteems. Many Christian paupers will suddenly find the treasure laid up in heaven, where moth and rust do not corrupt.

"When the time comes that the worldly shall gnash their teeth, they shall witness all the elect and angels saying to God: 'This man has been a faithful minister and teacher. He has proclaimed the saving Word of God to a world of castaways. On yonder earth he was despised, persecuted, and maligned, but he shines now as a star with imperishable luster.'"
C. F. W. Walther, The Proper Distinction between Law and Gospel, trans., W. H. T. Dau, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1928, p. 402. Daniel 12:3.

This does not apply to pastors alone, but to all believers who have endured hardships because of the Word and have faithfully served in whatever office God has given them.

Friday, December 14, 2007

ELCA News Release - Dead Serious Stuff



Do Something About Your Own Methane, ELCA!


ELCA NEWS SERVICE

December 13, 2007

ELCA Advocacy Offices Purchase Carbon Offset Credits
07-205-AL


WASHINGTON (ELCA) -- The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) Washington Office, ELCA Corporate Social Responsibility, Pittsburgh, and Lutheran Office for World Community, New York, have purchased carbon offset credits to mitigate their carbon emissions accumulated through air travel.

"Our offices have been working to reduce our carbon footprints by turning off lights and power strips when we're not in our offices, for example. But short of turning off all electricity and ceasing to travel, it's very difficult to eliminate your carbon emissions entirely," said Mary Minette, ELCA director for environmental education and advocacy.

"Since the advocacy staff travels extensively, we've purchased offset credits to balance those carbon emissions. The credits will go toward renewable energy projects, thus reducing the overall amount of power generated by burning fossil fuels," said Minette.

The specific projects funded by the carbon offsets purchased by the advocacy offices will support the use of anaerobic digesters, machines that dramatically reduce the amount of methane that escapes into the atmosphere while simultaneously generating renewable energy for the dairy farms that run them. Methane, like carbon dioxide, is a major contributor to global warming.

To determine the amount of the offices' carbon emissions that needed to be offset, Minette surveyed the staff about their air travel. She used that information with a carbon emissions calculator on the Internet and then purchased the appropriate
amount of credits needed to compensate for the travel.

Minette hopes this move by the advocacy office will start a trend in the ELCA. "Imagine the amount of carbon emissions we'd save if the entire churchwide organization, every synod office, and every congregation were to reduce their energy use and budget for the purchase of offset credits for the remaining energy consumption," she said.

"Our social statement, 'Caring for Creation: Vision, Hope and Justice,' commits us as individuals, as a worship community, and as a public church, to address the threat of global warming. I encourage all Lutherans to calculate their carbon footprints, reduce their energy consumption, and purchase carbon offset credits where appropriate," Minette said.

***

GJ - Greenland was once fertile farmland, long before people worried about cow methane and global warming. According to the book 1421, Greenland was circumnavigated during that time, before the area froze over again. Warming and cooling cycles are not caused by ovine, bovine, and human methane.

J.K. - I read about the ELCA buying "carbon credits". What's that anyway? From whom does one buy carbon credit? I never heard of this, but I do have planet for sale that is currently unoccupied by any Mormon patriarch.

GJ - Roman Catholics would call it reparation - paying for one's sins with money. Money is given to various green projects to atone for one's sins. This is crucial for ELCA's ultra-sensitive (to fads) departments. They love traveling all over the world on the offerings of the laity. However, they are burdened with guilt for spewing all that exhaust into the atmosphere. So they use even more offering money to satisfy the rage of AlGore, deity of the Greens. Meanwhile, AlGore is making money from the loot being offered to these projects.

NIV Isaiah 33:1 Woe to you, O destroyer, you who have not been destroyed! Woe to you, O traitor, you who have not been betrayed! When you stop destroying, you will be destroyed; when you stop betraying, you will be betrayed.

The Wauwatosa Gospel at Work




Police Called To Wauwatosa Denny's Over 100 Times
TODAY’S TMJ4 ^ | 12/13/07 | Mick Trevey


WAUWATOSA - There are problems at a Denny’s restaurant in Wauwatosa.

TODAY’S TMJ4 has video showing people punching each other in the dining room. We're talking about the Denny’s location on North Avenue right by Highway 45. Police are called their constantly, nearly every other night according to police reports.

That's too much for some Wauwatosa leaders. One melee broke out at 2:00 a.m. Saturday as people were trying to eat at Denny’s. Punches flew. People rushed from their tables to see what was going on. Chris Gilbert was there.

“A little wrestling and then it got broken up and I was in between and kind of separating both sides,” Gilbert said.

Dartell Delarosa was in the fight. He has broken blood vessels in his eye.

TODAY’S TMJ4’s Mick Trevey: “Do you think there should be people fighting in a Denny’s restaurant?”

“No. Ithink there should be better security. There was a guard there but he didn't really do much,” Dartel Delarosa said.

People inside say they don't like eating with violent fighting nearby.

“When you go to a restaurant, you expect to go eat, calm, peace, but things happen,” Gilbert said.

This Denny’s drains Wauwatosa police resources. Officers were called to the diner 100 times in 2006 and about 150 times so far this year.

Most of those calls come in the very early hours of the morning.

Aldermen think something needs to change.

“My own particular preference is that they close their, reduce their, business hours and are closed between midnight and 5:00 a.m.,” Wauwatosa Alderman Don Birschel said.

Late Thursday afternoon, Denny’s announced changes because of the serious problems. They say the location will close from midnight until 5:00 a.m. on weekends. They're deciding whether to make that change permanent.

***

rlschultz
has left a new comment on your post "The Wauwatosa Gospel at Work":

This Denny's is but a few blocks away from the Love Shack at 2929. Why can't we all just get along?

A. Nony Mouse has left a new comment on your post "The Wauwatosa Gospel at Work":

Keep up the wonderful articles, Greg! People will see how nuts you really are.

***

The premier Wauwatosa website of the Wisconsin Synod remains silent about these shocking incidents.

Thursday, December 13, 2007

The Pre-LCMS Jungkuntz



Richard Jungkuntz, Northwestern College, WELS; Concordia Seminary, Springfield, LCMS;
LCMS Doctrinal Commission;
Pacific Lutheran University (ALC)


Mark Braun, Those Were Trying Years

Jungkuntz and Ralph Gehrke resigned their professorships at Northwestern College shortly after the 1961 convention. E. E. Kowalke, Centennial Story: Northwestern College 1865?1965 (Watertown, WI: Northwestern College, 1965), 270, reported that one of the two (not identifying which one) said simply, "I share the Missouri position." Jungkuntz accepted a call to Concordia Seminary, Springfield, Gehrke to Concordia College, River Forest, following the 1961 convention. Northwestern's Board of Control refused to grant them a peaceful release of their calls, citing their "public rejection of the Synod's position regarding the principles of church fellowship."

From Lawrence White:

The issue of woman suffrage cannot be viewed in isolation from other questions about the role of women in the church, ultimately including that of ordination to the pastoral office. In historical perspective, it is undeniably clear that for the liberal elites which controlled the Synod throughout the 1960's, the approval of woman suffrage in the church was only one step, albeit an important step, in the achievement of complete gender equality in the church. Dr. Richard Jungkuntz, the Executive Secretary of the CTCR in the late "60's" and one of the chief architects of approval for woman suffrage, most certainly held this view. Jungkuntz would later recall a discussion within the Commission with Dr. Martin Scharlemann, one of the St. Louis Seminary's leading New Testament Greek scholars, in this way:

"Just as the discussion was drawing to a close, Dr., Scharlemann observed, 'But if those positions that Jungkuntz has taken, and his arguments in support of them, if they are valid, that means women's ordination should be permitted.' And I said, "Well, you're the one who said it,' and I did not pursue it further because that would have led us down this other path and utterly derailed the suffrage question. My feeling (and that was a political choice) was that if we can get suffrage in, at least there's a foot in the door or a camel's nose under the tent."(47)

Had liberal dominance not been interrupted by the 1969 conservative coup, that process would almost certainly have culminated in approval of women's ordination at some point in the 1970's. Woman suffrage was deliberately intended to be " camel's nose under the tent" for the ordination of women, to use Dr. Jungkuntz's apt image. The only thing the liberals failed to anticipate was that by the time the camel's nose had slipped in, the tent would be under new management. The theological linkage between suffrage and ordination is reflected in the subsequent declaration of Seminex Faculty in favor of women's ordination. Throughout this period of transition the faculty of Concordia Seminary in St. Louis played a prominent role in shaping the Synod's theology. In 1974, following the removal of Seminary President John Tietjen, the majority of the faculty departed into self-styled "exile" to form "Christ Seminary - Seminex." A few years later, in 1979, these same professors issued a document on the role of women in the church entitled "For the Ordination of Women." Their appeal for women pastors included this very specific comment about the relationship between suffrage and ordination:

"If they (that is, 1 Corinthians 14:33b-36 and 1 Timothy 2:8-15) do apply to the ordination of women they should apply equally to the question of woman suffrage in the church, to the role of women as congregational officers and to any situation in which women would teach or exercise authority over men. There is nothing inherent in the pastoral office which would make it logical to restrict the application of these passages to it."(48)

Church historian Dr. James Weis, a professor at Concordia Theological Seminary in Springfield, had also suggested an unavoidable linkage between suffrage and ordination. In a 1970 article in the seminary's theological journal The Springfielder, Weis reviewed the development of the Synod's position on women in the church. He noted that the same convention which had approved woman suffrage had also called for "a study of the ministry of women in church and society; including any areas where prejudices because of sex may be in evidence." The seminary professor went on to note: "If this proposal is acted on, future conventions of the Synod will likely be faced with the task of considering the question of the ordination of women into the parish ministry." Dr. Weis concluded:

"It is without question that the position of the Synod and its leaders on the place of women in the church has changed a number of times during the first two-thirds of the twentieth century...The old restrictions on woman suffrage in the congregations and in the synod have now been lifted. It remains to be seen what decisions the Synod will arrive at in the future in the matter of the ordination of women into the parish ministry."(49)

47. Richard J. Jungkuntz, Ibid., p. 189.

48. The Faculty of Christ Seminary-Seminex, "For the Ordination of Women," St. Louis: n.p. 1979, p.5.

49. James Weis, "The Status of Women in the Missouri Synod in the Twentieth Century," The Springfielder, Volume XXXIII, No. 4 (March, 1970), pp. 40-41.



***

GJ - One reader remembered Jungkuntz only as a lightning rod in the LCMS. The pastor was unaware of Jungkuntz' role in the Wisconsin Synod. A study of those pastors who were trained by Jungkuntz and Gehrke at Northwestern College will reveal the apostate leaders of WELS and (to a degree) Seminex.

Jungkuntz and Gehrke were martyrs frequently mentioned and pictured in Missouri in Perspective, the tabloid published by the Seminex leaders.

Why are women performing pastoral acts in Missouri and WELS?
Short answer - Jungkuntz.

At the Purple Palace, Paul McCain went into denial-overdrive when I told him of the ELCA women vicars (Columbus, Ohio) baptizing and consecrating in LCMS congregation. I knew because I read the letters of the young women at the Trinity Seminary (ELCA) library in Columbus.

More Questions about UOJ


Augustinian Successor has left a new comment on your post "Thy Strong Word Fan":

Dear Pastor Gregory,

Thank you for explaining the old Lutheran view on the difference between reconciliation and justification. If I understand you correctly, justification of the sinner qua SINNER comes through only by the MINISTRY of reconciliation. RECONCILIATION on the Cross provides the basis for JUSTIFICATION, but is not to be equated or conflated. In that sense, on the Cross, the wrath of God the Father was *propitiated* (God reconciled to the world as a matter of accomplished fact - IS)), but *expiation* (the world OUGHT to be reconciled to God) takes place by the action of the Holy Spirit in hypostatic conjunction with Word (Verbum dei est Gladiatus Spiritus).

Am I correct in believing that the fathers of Lutheran Orthodoxy also held to old Lutheran view?

***

GJ - Pastor Gregory reminds me of a TV show - Mr. Ed. The combination of a professional title and a first name lends itself to comedy.

I understand Old Lutherans to represent the era after the Concordists and before Walther. In the histories of American Lutherans we find distinctions between the Pietists/Revivalists and the Old Lutherans. The liberals were the Pietists who opposed the liturgy, Lutheran doctrine, wine used in Holy Communion, dancing, tobacco, and cards. The Pietists were unionists. Walther was profoundly influenced by the Pietists.

In general, the European Lutherans came over (Missouri included) with a Pietistic buzz. Many moved closer to orthodoxy when they saw how divisive and anti-Lutheran the revivalists and unionists were.

The General Council had some fine Lutheran leaders who did not embrace UOJ at all. Concerning the efficacy of the Word, the General Council was much clearer (and closer to Luther) than the Synodical Conference ever was.

WELS has never forgiven Lenski (old ALC) for stating the obvious - that justification in the New Testament is always justification by faith.

UOJ is new and came from the Pietists via Walther, so UOJ is not found in the Old Lutherans. I cannot say I have gone through all the orthodox Lutherans in Latin to prove UOJ was never stated by anyone. That would require a lifetime of reading and superior eyesight. I do know that claims about J. Gerhard supporting UOJ are utterly false. Ditto Calov (relying on Robert Preus' last book).

Without getting into all the Latinate words, I would agree with your statement as being a good summary of the Gospel. Christ died for the sins of the world. He is the propitiation. Because the Atonement or reconciliation is universal, no one needs to doubt whether it is true for him. Luther said it best when he wrote, "No sin is so evil that it can damn us. No work is so good that it can save us."

We always need to hear the Gospel to strengthen our faith. Luther emphasized about the cross - "Those are my sins. I caused His suffering. I did that to Him."

The preaching and teaching of the Gospel is the method by which God converts all people to Christ. Baptismal regeneration is an important part of this ministry. Infants hear the Word and believe. There is no purer justification by faith than that of a tiny baby. Justification by faith continues when the soul is nurtured by the Gospel. For many different reasons people fall away from the Gospel and actively reject the Gospel in time.

Sadly, the Synodical Conference represents a defection from Biblical truth and the Book of Concord. That is why no one will publish a scholarly, exegetical defense of Justification Without Faith (UOJ). Synod idolatry has kept people from dealing with doctrinal issues. The results are apparent in Missouri's Ablaze!, the faltering programs of WELS, and the defenestrations of the Little Sect on the Prairie.

Wouldn't it be strange to have people declaring that Augustine was infallible, that anyone who questioned Augustine about any doctrinal issue was a heretic and doomed? Augustine wrote that nothing he said should be accepted unless it was in complete agreement with the Word of God. Now we have synodical disciples who believe nothing in the Bible unless it is in agreement with Walther, or Pieper (F. or A. but not both), or Sig Becker, or Waldo Werning.

Walther was far too keen about declaring his theses and defending his conclusions with the right Biblical passages, whether they fit or not. In time his disciples repeated the same statements with robotic consistency but without conviction born of study. That is why they fly into a rage when challenged.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Thy Strong Word Fan



Luther's Seal, by Norma Boeckler

Augustinian Successor has left a new comment on your post "Lutherans Missing the Boat":

Dear Pastor Jackson,

I enjoy your writings, and I think I've visited all of your sites, including this blog. Your Thy Strong Word is fabulous and an absolute must read! It's good to read an independent, non-partisan Lutheran view on the going-ons in contemporary Lutheranism in North America. Myself am not a confessional Lutheran as such, but 80 percent! I'm an acutally an Anglican belonging to a continuing jurisdiction, much in the same boat as you and like-minded brethren. The Church of England (Continuing) is a miniscule Church with only some six properly organised congregations, plus scattered members at home (i.e. UK) and abroad (including myself).

I have a question concerning UOJ. Can you please clarify *your* position on UOJ? Can you please explicate how your understanding of what the orthdodox Lutheran understanding of the CROSS differ from the modern intepretation. It seems to me that the doctrinal position of UOJ amongst the three main confessional Lutheran bodies (WELS, ELS and LCMS) may differ only in terms?

Thank you.

Warmly in Christ,
Jason

***

GJ - Every so often someone offers a postive review of Thy Strong Word. I appreciate that because the book involved about 10 years of work. Only a few copies are left, but it will be available on the Net and possibly in shorter form through Lulu.com.

I am uncomfortable with the notion of my position on anything theological. Doctrinal conflict helps us study what the Word of God plainly says. The problem is getting through the assertions of the past, supplanting the authority and plain meaning of the revealed Word of God. Confessions are good because people work out their witness to the truth. However, when we start worshiping sainted leaders as idols, we are no different from pagans.

I am indebted to various laymen who encouraged me to study the issue of UOJ.

As Jason said, the old Synodical Conference agrees about the basics of forgiveness without faith, without the Word, grace apart from the Means of Grace. The same basic position (with some slight changes) can be found among ELCA liberals and the Universalists. Karl Barth (and his mistress Charlotte Kirschbaum) taught something similar. Since Barth-Kirschbaum became the court theologian of Fuller Seminary, the convergence of McGavran Church Growth and WELS Enthusiasm is easy to understand. Both have the foundation, false though it be, of Universalism.

The classic UOJ position is stated in the LCMS Brief Confession, 1932, echoed in J. P. Meyer's inept Ministers of Christ (WELS), and parroted in the ELS publications (reprinting Walther's Easter Absolution sermon). The UOJ position, in short, is that God declared the entire world forgiven of its sin the moment Christ died, alternately the moment He rose from the dead. This Moment of Absolution comes from the Walther sermon.

The exegetical confusion of WELS-ELS-LCMS comes from the concept of reconciliation. Here they fall into a rationalistic trap to support the infallibility of Walther and his disciple F. Pieper. Here is the trap - If Christ exchanged our sinfulness for His righteousness, then everyone must have become righteous when He died on the cross.

Lost in their logical pratfall is the basic notion that reconciliation is not justification. Is justification the same as sanctification? The two concepts bear a relationship to each other, but we cannot equate the two. The Holy Spirit always works through the Word, but the Holy Spirit is not the Word. Reconciliation is not Universal Objective Justification.

The reconciliation passage is another way of expressing the Atonement.

KJV 2 Corinthians 5:18 And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation; 19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation.
20 Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God. (See also Romans 4 and 5)

The Atonement (reconciliation) means that Christ has paid the price for our sins, for all time, even if no one ever believes this to be true. However, the ministry of reconciliation that Paul speaks about is the preaching of the Gospel. The treasure of the Atonement is distributed by the Holy Spirit through the Word. Lutherans call the Word and Sacraments the Means of Grace because those are the instruments (means) by which God pledges to give His grace. We are never in doubt about how to receive His grace. This treasure lies in one heap until that distribution takes place through the Holy Spirit. The Gospel promises move people--even babies through Holy Baptism--to faith. Justification by faith means receiving this grace through the Word.

The Parable of the Prodigal Son illustrates the reconciliation quite well. The Prodigal knows from coveting the carob pods (pig food) that he has reached the bottom, all his money spent on fast women and slow horses. He returns home with godly sorrow (the effect of the Law). Contrition is not forgiveness and does not earn forgiveness. Any son in the same condition would be afraid of his father's wrath. But this Father runs to meet him, to embrace him, to welcome him back. A contrite sinner receives this forgiveness with the greatest joy, knowing it is not earned by merit, decision, or attitude.

True preaching includes God's Law and God's Gospel. Grace comes to us only through the Means of Grace. Calvinists separate the Holy Spirit from the Means of Grace, as if the Word and Sacraments could be without effect. Isaiah 55 says otherwise. God's Word is never without effect and always accomplishes His purpose.

Inca Doves Warming Up




One reader took me to task for neglecting the garden articles I used to publish. That reminds me of a similar complaint, "You have been averaging only two posts a day."

Yesterday we received our allotment of the winter storm. I happened to be north, trying not to slide off I-17 as the freezing rain fell. The weather turned cold overnight in Glendale. This morning it was only 40 degrees, normally as cold as it gets in the Phoenix area.

I looked outside this morning and saw dozens Inca doves clustered on the fence, around the flower pot, on the window sill, and on the chlorine buckets. Some were stacked double-decker, to stay warm. They were catching the morning sun several hours ago and are still sitting there, preening their feathers.

Feathers perplex the scientists of evolution. Not every bird can fly, but all birds have feathers, in several categories, for flight, warmth, attraction. The Inca doves fluffed up their downy feather to keep their bodies warm this morning. Inside we had several down blankets we use on the bed. Birds preen because the feathers have to be aligned just so for them to fly.

One feather alone has about 300 million barbs on it. The barbs keep the feathers in place. They work a bit like Velcro.

I put a number of plants, bushes, and trees in the yard to shade us from the burning heat, but also to attract birds. Few people seem to appreciate birds here, or I am speaking to the wrong people.

Every plant hosts a wide variety of insect life. Humming birds are common here, but always a treat to watch. They love the cape honeysuckle bushes, which are almost always in bloom with bright orange flowers. Humming birds do not simply sip nectar. That would be like living on Kool-aid. They also eat insects. Trees, bushes, and flowers are food centers for insects, so they help birds with food and shelter alike.

Recently I was picking tangelos from my tree when I heard a sound like a Star Wars light saber. A few feet away a humming bird floated and watched. They are fearless but also known for flattering bird-lovers. I have had them fly in and out of the shower from the garden hose, getting a bath on the fly.

Birds are happy to get water in shallow puddles, for drinking and bathing. I turn my waterfall on to give them a safe area to land, bathe, and get a drink.

I do not know how someone can look at all the dependencies within one group of creatures and say they evolved by chance or figured out how to survive. People are now so blind to Creation that they cannot see how our civil liberties and ethical concepts are tied to the Author of Life.

Lutherans Missing the Boat



Choose Between Tweele-dum and Tweedle-dee To Solve Lutheran Doctrinal Problems


Christian News announced a joint free conference in Minnesota. One part is represented by the Rolf Preus Synod. The other part is ELDONA (the tiny sect with the huge name). Jack Cascione will speak on his only topic, the supremacy of the Voters' Assembly. Someone from ELDONA will speak about the absolute need for bishops.
Cascione and Heiser both graduated from Concordia Seminary, Ft. Wayne, so I have to assume that both became doctrinally befuddled there. Their solutions recall the story that the Russian Orthodox Church was debating the benediction (three fingers for the Trinity or two for the Two Natures) during the Communist Revolution.

Here is another view from Bente, who edited the Concordia Triglotta:

"The Lutheran Church differs from all other churches in being essentially the Church of the pure Word and unadulterated Sacraments. Not the great number of her adherents, not her organizations, not her charitable and other institutions, not her beautiful customs and liturgical forms, etc., but the precious truths confessed in her symbols in perfect agreement with the Holy Scriptures constitute the true beauty and rich treasures of our Church, as well as the never-failing source of her vitality and power.

Wherever the Lutheran Church ignored her symbols or rejected all or some of them, there she always fell an easy prey to her enemies. But wherever she held fast to her God-given crown, esteemed and studied her confessions, and actually made them a norm and standard of her entire life and practice, there the Lutheran Church flourished and confounded all her enemies.

Accordingly, if Lutherans truly love their Church, and desire and seek her welfare, they must be faithful to her confessions and constantly be on their guard lest any one rob her of her treasure."

F. Bente, Concordia Triglotta preface.

The old Synodical Conference no longer wants Bente. Concordia Publishing House gave the rights to Northwestern Publishing. Everyone wants to use a new edition.