Martin Luther Sermons
Bethany Lutheran Hymnal Blog
Bethany Lutheran Church Sleepy Eye Assisted Living.
1100 1st Ave S. Apt 243. Sleepy Eye MN 56085-1863 Pastor Gregory Jackson, PhD USA, Canada, Australia, Philippines 10 AM Central - Sunday Service
We use The Lutheran Hymnal and the King James Version
Luther's Sermons: Lenker Edition
Click here for the latest YouTube Videos
Friday, May 25, 2012
Justification by Faith Is the Chief Article - Not UOJ.
The ELS Is a Quasi-Christian Sect,
Not Christian and Not Lutheran
AC V has left a new comment on your post "What is a Lutheran? | Evangelical Lutheran Synod. ...":
If the question is "What is a Lutheran?" then give references, please, from the the OFFICIAL Lutheran confession of faith, the BOOK OF CONCORD, to substantiate that ELS confession:
Through this completed work of Jesus, God the Father sees the whole world as not guilty, or justified. This teaching of “justification” is the central truth of the Bible.
That may be the definition and central teaching of an ELS Lutheran, but it isn't of a Book of Concord Lutheran.
Saturday, February 4, 2012
At Least They Are Not Hosting Leonard Sweet This Time!
It's a good thing they got rid of that old liberal Kieschnick. Now they have a rock-ribbed conservative as Synod President. Harrison mentions Walther and the entire Midwest region sighs in ecstasy.
All the ELCA seminaries are overwhelmingly in favor of homosexual ordination and marriage. Woe to anyone who dissents from the new orthodoxy. Thus "conservative" Missouri is doing its best to create doctrinal indifference while pretending otherwise.
Saturday, January 22, 2011
Ho, Ho
Narrow-minded Lutheran has left a new comment on your post "Bueller, Bueller. Anyone? Anyone?":
Sorry I poorly worded my point. ELCA is rotten, but the smugness of Missouri and WELS is nauseating. It would be like going on a date with a known prostitute vs. going out with a "nice" girl that tells you she is a part-time prostitute as you walk her to the door at the conclusion of the date. Once the "nice" girl is discovered to be not-so-nice, would you not run as fast as you could? Wouldn't you feel proud to take her home to Mom and Dad?
This was me five years ago in Missouri. Yes, we always pointed out the errors of ELCA, and rightly so. When I started considering sem, I began to study and look into things. The conclusion was that practice was not nearly as orthodox as the talk. I also concluded from this study that the vast majority of the laity are either ignorant, poorly catechized, or simply will never leave or make waves because their great-grandparents were LCMS-ers.
Missouri bad-mouths ELCA for their tolerance of homosexuality, and rightly so; but Missouri fails to discipline in the case of an openly-homosexual music director out West. Missouri bad-mouths ELCA for liberal Communion practice; but an LCMS seminary prof told me that it's the DP's job to enforce closed Communion when I asked him why the LCMS was not addressing the issue of closed Communion. Missouri bad-mouths female ordination in ELCA, yet LCMS females are allowed to assist in the distribution and readings.
I could go on for pages, so enough. My ultimate point is that LCMS is twenty-to-thirty years behind ELCA.
***
GJ - WELS and Missouri are almost the same. The Little Sect on the Prairie objects to nothing in WELS and has its own Church and Change (Emerging Church) parish.
So ditto the ELS.
Friday, January 21, 2011
He said, “My wife and I left the LCMS teaching profession 20 years ago.......” and the termination letter from that old cell church of mine.
Friday, January 7, 2011
2 Epiphany pastors resign; one forms a new ministry
2 Epiphany pastors resign; one forms a new ministry
By Jill Kelley, Staff WriterUpdated 11:57 PM Thursday, January 6, 2011
Saturday, December 18, 2010
ELCA Task Force to Suggest Recommendations for Church's Future - News Releases -
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.
Your Diaprax Is Ready
ELCA NEWS SERVICE
December 17, 2010
ELCA Task Force to Suggest Recommendations for Church's Future
CHICAGO (ELCA) -- A task force of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), which has engaged the church's membership in an extensive conversation about the denomination's future, will soon begin preparing its report and recommendations to the ELCA Church Council. The council is expected to transmit to the 2011 ELCA Churchwide Assembly recommendations related to the task force's work.
Task force members will meet here January 28-29, 2011, a key face-to-face meeting prior to issuing their report and recommendations.
In November 2009 the ELCA Church Council approved the charter for the project, "Living into the Future Together: Renewing the Ecology of the ELCA" and appointed a task force. The project task force was asked to study social, economic and other environmental changes in the 20 years since the ELCA was formed and "evaluate the organization, governance and interrelationships among this church's expressions," according to the project charter.
The task force was asked to develop a report and recommendations "that will position this church for the future and explore new possibilities for participating in God's mission," the charter states. The report and recommendations are to be reviewed by the ELCA Conference of Bishops in March 2011 and presented for action to the Church Council, which meets in April 2011.
The task force, which met for the first time in January 2010, focused on two key questions as it gathered information from throughout the church, said the Rev. Diane "Dee" Pederson, St. Cloud, Minn., task force chair:
+ What is God calling this church to be and do in the future?
+ What changes are in order to help us respond most faithfully?
"The task force was committed to beginning a conversation that would invite engagement, ideas, imagination and wisdom from people across this church," she said in an interview. Task force members developed questions on topics such as Lutheran identity, ELCA membership and priorities for ministry, she said. Task force work teams focused on specific topics such as ELCA identity, opportunities, interrelationships, congregations, partnerships, financial resources, and structure and governance.
The task force posted questions online at http://www.ELCA.org/lift on the ELCA project website for response, and it invited responses through a blog at http://liftELCA.org on the Web, Pederson said.
More than 1,000 people responded to the online survey questions, and ELCA Research and Evaluation staff randomly sampled additional pastors and members. Many leadership groups commented to the task force, such as the ELCA Conference of Bishops, the ELCA Church Council, campus ministry staff, college and university presidents, multicultural organization leaders, global mission partners, and youth and young adults. Voting members at more than 40 synod assemblies offered input.
The task force also met with several consultants, held conference calls, and conducted focus groups and interviews. In August it brought together bishops, pastors, leaders from institutions of higher education, ecumenical partners and leaders from various partner agencies to consider mission capacity and funding, Pederson said.
Task force members learned that ELCA members have deep commitments "to our theology, our understanding of justification by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, to sharing the 'Good News,' to theological education and to lay leadership," Pederson said. Members are less clear about Lutheran identity or what it means to be an ELCA member, she said.
The task force invited comment on possible future scenarios for the EL
CA, she said. Its report will likely focus on the roles of congregations and synods, sustainability, mission support funding, and ELCA structure and governance, Pederson added.
While much information has been gathered, there is still time for members to comment to the task force through the website or the blog.
"I've described the process as something that was intended to engage as many people as possible," said the Rev. Richard H. Graham, bishop of the ELCA Metropolitan Washington, D.C., Synod, and task force member. "We want to hear from anyone who wants to give us information."
From his perspective, Graham said, members have expressed a desire to renew congregational life and mission, and "to help congregations understand themselves as places where mission has to take place."
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
ELCA Going Senile, Or
ELCA Bishop Mark Hanson As the Obama of Lutherdom
Let's see: glasses, cool head mike, timing lights, stole...
Stop laughing!"
ELCA NEWS SERVICE
November 23, 2010
ELCA Joins Effort to Keep Clean Air Act Regulatory Authority Intact
The denominations and faith-based organizations released a joint letter to the Senate Nov. 23 in which they stated they "are called to protect and serve God's great creation and work for justice for all of God's people."
"We believe that the United States must take all appropriate and available actions to prevent the worst impacts of climate change. We therefore urge you to oppose any efforts to undermine the authority of the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas emissions," according to the letter. In particular, the religious groups noted challenges to the Clean Air Act from U.S. Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., who has proposed delaying regulation of greenhouse gases by the Environmental Protection Agency.
"We urge you to protect the Clean Air Act and allow the Environmental Protection Agency to use the full strength of the law to ensure that God's creation and God's children remain healthy," the letter stated.
---
Specifically, some council members may be elected whose skills and expertise are deemed crucial to the governance of the ELCA. The council also proposed eliminating a number of advisors because costs cannot be justified as mission support declines. Input from these constituencies could be provided in other ways, according to the background information.
Christina Jackson-Skelton, ELCA treasurer, said the projection for 2011 current fund income is a decrease of nearly $2.5 million from revised estimates for 2010. In particular, the 2011 budget is based on $48 million in anticipated mission support income, reduced from the $51 million in anticipated mission support for 2010, she said. The estimate for ELCA World Hunger income for 2011 is $1.7 million less than for 2010.
***
GJ - ELCA is favor of abortion for any reason, but opposed to capital punishment for convicted criminals. They give innocent babies the death penalty, without the benefit of a trial, yet WELS and Missouri both work with ELCA gladly.
ELCA is worried about the Clean Air Act yet spends its dwindling resources on more political lobbying.
Mark Hanson has total control of the structure, or the Lavender Mafia has total control of him. Either way, he appears to be the senile, doddering old fool of British comedy, flexible about the Ten Commandments, obstinate about his power.
Monday, September 27, 2010
Rogue Lutheran and the LCMS
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Exposing the Synods
This is not kelmed in order to show how bad ELCA is, but to show how all the synods behave. The website is now linked on the left for readers 'convenience:
Toward the end of the service, a former church council president approached the microphone and voiced his disagreement with the message and claimed that Rev. Cooper had violated his "Letter of Call" for stating that the ELCA's new policies oppose God's directive in Scripture. (listen here - the last minute of the service)
This incident led to a meeting between Rev. Cooper, Northeast Iowa Synod Bishop Steven L. Ullestad and Assistant to the Bishop Mark Anderson. Rev. Cooper explained that during the meeting Bishop Ullestad informed him that if the former church council president followed through with his claim against the pastor, Bishop Ullestad "would rule against me, that I had, in fact, violated my Letter of Call. The only two things he specified, that I recall, was that I was a little too Catholic in my understanding of the . . . reason for sex. The second thing was that he said I couldn't say that the ELCA had violated the will of God."
At a second meeting, Rev. Cooper said that Bishop Ullestad told him "You don't understand. You could be in really serious trouble." Rev. Cooper replied, "Do what you have to do . . . I stand by what I said."
Rev. Cooper went on to say that during the meeting there "really was a feeling that either I recant or I was done, at least from the synod's perspective."
To set the context, Rev. Cooper had been the pastor at Emanuel Lutheran for 6 years, and it was his first call. The year prior to this incident, Rev. Cooper submitted his papers with the ELCA seeking a specific call, to which the bishop's office encouraged him to consider two or three other calls as well. But Rev. Cooper did not feel God was calling him to any of those positions at the time.
In February of this year, Rev. Cooper again submitted his papers seeking a new call. As of the first week of September, 2010, he has not received any profiles from any of the four ELCA synods to which he submitted his name, and none of the synods have talked with him.
According to Rev. Cooper, "When I asked the Bishop (Ullestad) flat out, 'Am I blacklisted?' He said, 'Well, congregations don't want pastors who cause problems.'"
So let's look at Rev. Cooper's record. Over the last 6 years, Emanuel Lutheran has met their expenses every year. Their benevolence has been at least 10% to 20%. They have seen an increase in worship attendance every year and received 40 new members in 2009, all in a town with a population of just over a 1000 people.
The only "problems" that Rev. Cooper can be accused of causing are that he took a public stand against the denomination's homosexuality policies and clearly stated that the ELCA is elevating their own view over the authority of Scripture. Rev. Cooper believes this is why the ELCA has refused to work with him as he seeks to find a new call.
Based on Rev. Cooper's testimony, it seems clear that the denomination wants to deny pastors the freedom to express publicly their "bound conscience," if it does not line up with the ELCA's decisions. It can further be understood that pastors are not to preach or teach anything other than what the ELCA social statement says.
With that in mind, pastors should remember that their responsibility is to faithfully live out his or her calling and the vows taken at ordination, most especially to teach and preach in accordance with the Holy Scriptures, the creeds and confessions. We all are ultimately responsible to God and God alone.
It is wrong for the ELCA or any denomination to prohibit or discourage pastors from teaching from the Word of God. It appears that the ELCA is trying to silence orthodox pastors, which should cause all of us to question the ELCA's motives and actions.
(Rev. Jason Cooper resigned from the ELCA, Sept. 2010)
---
From ALPB:
I am a pastor in the NE Iowa Synod. I know and vouch for Pr. Cooper. The blog article is accurate. I have both read and heard Pastor Cooper's sermon (back in April, about four weeks after the sermon). I've talked with Jason and with members of Emmanuel in Strawberry Point. The fact remains that Bishop Ullestad four times told Jason he had violated his letter of call by preaching the sermon he did (in which case, I have done that far more), yet the Bishop refused to initiate discipline, despite Pr. Cooper's repeated request that he do so; indeed, if the Bishop thought Pastor Cooper had violated his letter of call, then the Bishop should have been willling to back that up with the full weight of the discipline process.
Two more points of interest and follow-up:
1) Pastor Cooper is not a long-standing critic of the ELCA. In fact, he was dean of his conference through March of this year; he was a moderate who three years ago thought that pastors Hahn, Hatcher, and myself and others in Call to Faithfulness were a little too radical. Interesting thing is that the direction of the ELCA over the last two years opened Jason's eyes. BTW his sermon is not radical--it's simply Biblical and catholic.
2) Emmanuel, after Pr. Cooper left and led strictly by their lay leadership, passed a first vote to leave the ELCA on June 6, by 92-28. The second vote on Sept 12 fell one vote short with a 107-55 margin. The 28 pro-ELCA revisionists recruited 27 inactives who hadn't darkened the church doors for years (a lesson in the importance of having an up to date list of voting members). I doubt those 27 showed up this past Sunday at Emmanuel. Certainly the 107 did not--they, representing 75% of the active membership of Emmanuel, have left and begun a mission congregation (which I think will go NALC). My two congregations provided them with 70 LBW's for their first worship service this past Sunday (yesterday) at the Strawberry Point Civic Center--and the mission congregation worshiping at the civic center likely more than doubled the rump congregation that gathered at Emmanuel. Another pyrrhic victory for the revisionists at Emmmanuel and for the ELCA.
Ken
---
Jim,
No one else in terms of being told directly that they have violated their letter of call, as Pastor Cooper was (but I note that the Bishop explicitly refused to bring discipline charges against Pr. Cooper which of course would have required the Bishop to make public such a case vs. Pr. Cooper, which would also have put his "neutrality" principle and "bound conscience" on public display--and demonstrated the unworkable and empty nature of such principles and terms). However, with 38 pastoral vacancies in the synod, something does indeed seem to "be up" in that other orthodox pastors besides Jason Cooper, who have filed their mobility papers with the synod have been told that "congregations do not want pastors at either extreme on this issue." I think the Bishop's generalization does not speak for all the congregations seeking pastors (and note then that to be orthodox and to have spoken out on these issues make one an "extremist.") I know personally of orthodox pastors in other synods who have sought to have their mobility papers sent to the NE Iowa synod and who have been told that "we have no vacancies at the present time." There are congregations among the 38 vacancies who are going into their 3rd year without a pastor.
Ken
***
GJ - This example can be multiplied many times over. The established synods--whether far Left (ELCA) or Methodist Mild (LCMS, WELS, ELS)--are fascinated with their own power and saturated with doctrinal, financial, and moral corruption. All of them have been yammering about evangelism while driving out faithful members and pastors for decades.
They all talk about doctrine, too, but what do they promote? They spend most of their time and money on the latest bilge. They do a little bit to publish older material and whine, "But nobody buys it."
Thrifty pastors whose computer skills are limited to copying my Photoshops and Groeschel's sermons have a potential solution that meets their felt-needs.
Lulu.com is a user-friendly publishing service. Someone can write a book and publish it, with many promotional features, for free. The only cost will be ordering a proof copy, which is provided at the wholesale price (about 50% off).
Old-fashioned publishing - $10,00 to 25,000 per title.
Computerized publishing - $3,000 for ordering 1,000 copies, which have to be sold at a profit to get into the black.
Lulu publishing - $10 proof copy to get the final version in public view, with promotion through Google. $200 to make it an e-book with Apple.
Starting a church:
ELCA/WELS/LCMS model - Spend $1 million buying land, providing mission or salary support.
Independent model - Find an inexpensive meeting place, use a computer and broadband to broadcast and save the services. Very little cost.
More people are now outside of the synods and calling themselves Lutheran than those who are members of synods. Decades of unfaithfulness to the Word have accomplished this.
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Sweet Promoted by a Graduate of Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary,
Better Known as The Sausage Factory
aging hippy slob.
Professional growth day teachers' conference Oct. 29, 2010 • 8 a.m-2 p.m. Lake Country Lutheran High • Hartland For teachers and administrators in the SWD and English District. Dr. Leonard Sweet will focus on education and learning in his and our Google world or better yet a "TGIF" world — Twitter, Google, iPhone, Facebook — as he defines our world today and in the future. The $35 registration cost includes lunch and break. Register online at swd.lcms.org/registration before Oct. 15. Flyer (PDF) |
Monday, September 6, 2010
Retired ELCA Bishop Chilstrom Tests the Limits of Cluelessness
From the Mankato Free Press, Mankato, Minn Sunday, Aug. 29, 2010
Questions for those leaving ELCA
Herbert W. Chilstrom
By the end of 2010 several hundred congregations (an estimated 2-3% of more than 10,300) will have left theEvangelical Lutheran Church in America to form other Lutheran church bodies. I have three questions for those
leaving:
First, what is it about sex that pushed you over the edge?
Since its founding more than twenty years ago the ELCA has wrestled with a number of complex issues, never binding anyone’s conscience, but helping us think about them. Included among them have been studies and statements on abortion, the death penalty and war. These three issues all involve the potential for taking a life. That seems far more serious than getting upset about two adults of the same gender who, like most of us straight folks, chose to live peacefully in a life-long relationship – the only such pairing the ELCA has approved. Like their straight neighbors, they live peacefully, go to their jobs every morning, pay their taxes, volunteer for good causes and, in many cases, worship with us. What is it that upsets you about this?
The only answer I seem to get from those leaving is that “this was the last straw.” But that still begs the question, “Why sex?” Surely some other divisive issue will come along – as it always does in every human institution – that could be “the last straw” in a new church body.
Second, why are you organizing new churches?
The picture is confusing. We hear of one called “Lutheran Churches in Mission for Christ” (LCMC) and another named “Lutheran Church in North America” (LCNA). [GJ - Chilstrom cannot get his names straight. This one is NALC.] This seems wasteful to those of us standing on the sidelines. Why not join an existing Lutheran church that agrees with your views on sex?
There are many choices: the Evangelical Lutheran Synod (headquartered here in Mankato), the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod, the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, the Association of Free Lutheran Congregations, and Church of the Lutheran Brethren – to name just a handful of more than two dozen in the United States. Surely there must be one among them that would welcome you. Why go to all the unnecessary expense of setting up an entirely new structure with officers, boards, committees and institutions?
I suspect the only reason is because none of them ordain women. Well, it’s good to know that you welcome women to your clergy ranks. But have you forgotten that it was only a short time ago when Lutherans fought intensely over that issue? Many were certain that neither the Bible nor tradition permitted women to be ordained. Why not drop your insistence on the ordination of women for the sake of unity with some existing church body?
Third, what will you say to your sons and daughters, sisters and brothers and others in your churches when they tell you they are homosexual?
You will no doubt suggest that they seek “reparative” therapy, even though more than 95% of professionals in the field tell us there’s nothing to “repair” because they are no more abnormal than the rest of us. Or, you may tell them they must simply remain alone, denying them of a life-long partnership. All of which brings us back to the first question: What is it about sex that pushed you over the edge?
I am both sad and relieved that you are leaving. Sad, because this was not what we hoped for when the ELCA was formed some 22 years ago. We believed we could be a church where we held to the essentials and allowed for differences on non-essentials.
But I am also relieved. Now those of us who remain in the ELCA can get on with our primary mission of telling everyone -- everyone, “Jesus loves you. You are welcome in this church.”
(Herbert W. Chilstrom, a resident of St. Peter, was the first presiding bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.)
Sunday, August 22, 2010
Otten Uses Video To Promote Christian News
Perhaps Herman Otten's grandchildren talked him into using video to promote Christian News.
Here is the link.
Otten's sister Marie Meyer is a board member of the American Lutheran Publicity Bureau, which has always promoted the liberal side of Missouri in a working relationship with ELCA (ALC and LCA before that). Marie Meyer was a college roommate of the future Grace Otten. Oddly, Grace was a CLC member attending liberal Valpo U. Grace was not allowed to attend Bethany in Mankato, but she went to Valpo.
Otten now has a Facebook page.
Paul McCain, MDiv, LCMS layman, worked secretly with Otten to get Barry elected the first time. McCain has 6,000 FB friends. I will let you know when he friends Otten.
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
Wiccans Happy About ELCA Service, Goddess Worship
Here is the Wiccan link, which links to its sources.
I was leaving the LCA when they denied all this was developing, even though it was.
WELS/LCMS/ELS will deny this is also around the corner, given their lovey-dovey stance with ELCA via Thrivent, and their covert/overt projects together.
Monday, August 16, 2010
How Delicious It Must Be - For a Lutheran To Denounce Thomism from a Thomist College
From Father Jack Kilcrease - Theologia Crucis
MONDAY, AUGUST 16, 2010
Breaking News: Michael Root Became Roman Catholic
I know, I know- it's way shocking.
When some one goes around saying things like "the law is a way to actualize our relationship with God" or "the theology of the cross isn't really central to Luther's theology" or "there's no difference between Luther and Aquinas on justification" or "Wow, things are bad in the ELCA- you know what would fix it? Having the Pope arbitrate everything"- it's incredibly hard to see why they would become Roman Catholic.
I'm actually quite pleased about the news. Not because I want Dr. Root to start believing in false doctrine (he's already believed in false doctrine for years and this doesn't really change that)-but rather Root has been Roman Catholic in his theology for some time and it's rather unfortunate that he went around saying that he was a loyal Lutheran and running a Lutheran seminary when he really believed in Thomism. It's also unfortunate that he was one of the architects of them getting involved with JDDJ and with the CCM (their ill-thought out adventure with pulpit fellowship with the Episcopalians). In any case, they'd probably have done all that stuff without him.
I might also add, that perhaps some fellow Missourian (who will go unnamed) who thought that he and his colleague David Yeago, were a sign of some progress in the ELCA just because they said positive things about the law, might want to rethink their positions. In fact, as I have pointed out on a number of occasions, these gentlemen do not merely think that the law has a positive place in the Christian life, (as I and every other red-blooded confessional Lutheran also believes) but that it actually is the basis of the divine-human relationship. The gospel is good for them essentially because it makes the law work as a way of relating to God. The gospel for them is not the last word (as it must be!).
We can see the end results. If the center of the Christian faith is the law, who has the most and best defined law? Bingo. I need say no
From -
----
Dr. Michael Root - A Man of Great Faith!
Dr. Michael Root taught me theology during my seminary years from 1981 to 1985. For the last two years I have been privileged to be his pastor. It was a most humbling experience to have my theological mentor sitting in the pews. But it was even more gratifying to get to know this man of deep faith. Last week a mass was held for his conversion at St. Peter's Catholic Church. It was bitter sweet to be there. I felt a whole whirlwind of emotions from joy at seeing this historic event unfold to sadness that the ELCA has lost yet another great theologian.
5 comments:
- Mr. Richard Miesel, O.P. said...
- Hi Pastor Metze,Has Dr. Root prepared a public statement about his decision to be received into full communion?Thanks,Mr. Richard Miesel, OP
- August 15, 2010 7:32 AM
- Pastor Tony Metze said...
- Yes, he has. Here is an excerpt. "On Monday I shared with the faculty the news that in the near future I will be received into the Catholic Church. I now wish to share that news with you. This action is not one that I take lightly. TheLutheran church has been my intellectual and spiritual home for forty years. But we are not masters of our convictions. A risk of ecumenicalstudy is that one will come to find another tradition compelling in a way that leads to a deep change in mind and heart. Over the last year or so, it has become clear to me, not without struggle, that I have become a Catholic in my mind and heart in ways that no longer permit me to present myself as a Lutheran theologian with honesty and integrity.This move is less a matter of decision than of discernment.No single issue has been decisive for me, but at the center of my reflection has been the question of how God’s grace engages thejustified person and the church in the divine mission of salvation.How are we redeemed as the free and responsible agents God created us to be?Catholic theology speaks of God elevating the justified person and the church to participation in the divine life and mission, so that Godgrants the Christian and the church participation in God’s actions in a different way than Lutheran theology affirms. Catholic teachings do not follow from that vision with deductive force, but they do hang togetherwith that vision in ways that I have come to find deeply convincing."
- August 15, 2010 2:18 PM
- Pastor Tony Metze said...
- Correction on above comment. This was the statement he sent to the faculty of Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary and was disseminated throughout the internet. I know of no other official statement at this time.
- August 15, 2010 2:20 PM
- ---
Lutherans Persisting
"They persisted in the apostles' teaching and communion" (Acts 2:42)
The present crisis and this blog
By Michael RootThe ELCA is now in crisis. On the most obvious level, the decisions to permit same-sex blessings and to permit ordinations of persons in such same-sex relations will lead many individuals and congregations to contemplate leaving the ELCA. Historically, fewer congregations leave than one expects, but some will leave and others will find ways to disengage from ELCA structures (e.g., by withholding contributions to synods and the national church).Beyond those organizational results, the teaching and practices adopted represent a crisis. For some, myself included, these are more than just mistakes, policies and ideas with which we disagree. They are false teaching, teaching that directly contradicts the clear command of Scripture and the authoritative tradition of the church. The ELCA is now not just a pilgrim church, an imperfect church on the way, but an erring church, a church which has, in an important part of its life, lost its way.For many, these two items are the crisis. But I think the crisis extends further. A third aspect of the present crisis is the way tendencies present in Lutheranism since the early 20th century are now coming to a head. One reason false teaching has captured the ELCA is that various views (a crude and static understanding of simul justus et peccator, a confusion between paradox and ambiguity, bad understandings of biblical authority) have come to be accepted as authentically Lutheran, even as defining Lutheranism. Recent developments are not simply the outcome of ‘liberalism,’ but also of what we have come to think of as ‘Lutheranism.’ (What I worry about at 2 AM when I cannot sleep is that what we have come to think of as ’Lutheran’ actually is Lutheran, in which case the Reformation was just wrong.) We will not come out of our present predicament without careful and extended thinking about basic questions of Lutheran theology.Finally, a fourth aspect of the crisis are the propositions the ELCA has come to affirm in thecourse of adopting the recent proposals, e.g., that opposing ‘bound consciences’ can stymie consistent church teaching or that no disagreement on ethics can divide the church (unless one side of the ethical disagreement is inconsistent with the doctrine of justification). These are bad ideas that will come back to haunt us.These topics and the process that stills lies ahead of us in the ELCA as the quite general decisions are turned into policies will be the subject matter of this blog.Michael RootThe ELCA is now in crisis. On the most obvious level, the decisions to permit same-sex blessings and to permit ordinations of persons in such same-sex relations will lead many individuals and congregations to contemplate leaving the ELCA. Historically, fewer congregations leave than one expects, but some will leave and others will find ways to disengage from ELCA structures (e.g., by withholding contributions to synods and the national church).
Beyond those organizational results, the teaching and practices adopted represent a crisis. For some, myself included, these are more than just mistakes, policies and ideas with which we disagree. They are false teaching, teaching that directly contradicts the clear command of Scripture and the authoritative tradition of the church. The ELCA is now not just a pilgrim church, an imperfect church on the way, but an erring church, a church which has, in an important part of its life, lost its way.
For many, these two items are the crisis. But I think the crisis extends further. A third aspect of the present crisis is the way tendencies present in Lutheranism since the early 20th century are now coming to a head. One reason false teaching has captured the ELCA is that various views (a crude and static understanding of simul justus et peccator, a confusion between paradox and ambiguity, bad understandings of biblical authority) have come to be accepted as authentically Lutheran, even as defining Lutheranism. Recent developments are not simply the outcome of ‘liberalism,’ but also of what we have come to think of as ‘Lutheranism.’ (What I worry about at 2 AM when I cannot sleep is that what we have come to think of as ’Lutheran’ actually is Lutheran, in which case the Reformation was just wrong.) We will not come out of our present predicament without careful and extended thinking about basic questions of Lutheran theology.
Finally, a fourth aspect of the crisis are the propositions the ELCA has come to affirm in the course of adopting the recent proposals, e.g., that opposing ‘bound consciences’ can stymie consistent church teaching or that no disagreement on ethics can divide the church (unless one side of the ethical disagreement is inconsistent with the doctrine of justification). These are bad ideas that will come back to haunt us.
These topics and the process that stills lies ahead of us in the ELCA as the quite general decisions are turned into policies will be the subject matter of this blog.
Michael Root
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
Ads by GoogleOnline Theology Degrees
Study Theology From Home. Earn A Degree. Request Free Info Today!
www.eLearners.com/TheologyThis entry was posted on August 27, 2009 at 3:01 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
38 Responses to “The present crisis and this blog”














August 27, 2009 at 7:00 pm
Thank you, Prof. Root. Many of us know that there is more wrong than we are able to articulate. I hope that you and others can help us with the historical/theological background to think this through.
We need more than anger, and more than the usual answers of “denominational” Lutheranism. I too have the same 2:00am thoughts.
August 28, 2009 at 5:23 am
I would love to hear more of your thoughts on numbers 3 and 4. It seems to me that last week’s decision was a furthering of the errors of ELCAism. We seem content to be a permanently separated church body and to be more sectarian than ever.
I am angry but more than that I am deeply saddened. Lord have mercy on us!
August 28, 2009 at 3:27 pm
Thanks Dr. Root for being a recognizable voice in the midst of so many others.
August 28, 2009 at 5:40 pm
True to the wishes of the governing Bishop, Mark Hanson, I wish to remind you, Mr. Root, that we are not to speak ill of the ELCA. As a current professor of Southern Seminary, unless you have tendered your resignation, we are called to speak well of each other and lift each other up in prayer. This constant bashing does no good. Bound conscience, as I read it says that we are to respect the other persons conscience and not use it as a personal tool. I hope, as a called faculty member of Southern Seminary, you keep personal opinions to yourself and teach the Systematic Theology class to which you have been called. Peace
August 29, 2009 at 3:06 pm
Joel, would you have made such a request of Martin Luther? I pray that Michael does not retreat to his faculty office but speaks the truth in love.
August 30, 2009 at 5:44 am
As I read Joel Brown’s response I wonder when it ceased to be a scholar’s legitimate role to publicly state his opinions – in this instance a professor of theology’s opinions regarding theology. I find no bashing here, and appreciate Professor Root’s establishing this blog, and the content he’s posted here already.
August 30, 2009 at 7:06 am
Mr. Brown should meditate on the Psalm for this Sunday: Who shall dwell on God’s holy hill? The person who speaks the truth from the heart. The issues we face involve commitments to truth on which there cannot be compromise — including that sin of remaining silent when we should have spoken. As Bonhoeffer noted in “Life Together,” nothing is more unloving than the silence that leaves another Christian in his sin, and nothing is more loving than a word of reproof (I Tim. 4.2) that calls a fellow Christian back from his sin.
August 30, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Joel, are your joking?? Please clarify that you are. To invoke the “governing” bishop Hanson by name in a call to “not speak ill of the ELCA” is almost camp!
C’mon, you sound like me making fun of the “inside ELCA” liberal culture that seems to, from my perspective, exist.
September 1, 2009 at 9:33 am
I believe that to squelch the voice of dissension from within is a step from the light of truth and toward the darkness. If Dr. Root cannot – as one of the premier teaching theologians of the ELCA – publish a blog discussing his concerns with good theological and biblical grounding, then we have truly failed to be the church.
This blog is no different than 95 theses posted on a door in Wittenberg. A call to conversation and serious consideration that there may be other issues to consider in this process.
I for one want no part of religious institution which will not allow me to voice a disaggrement, concern, or attempt to hold accountable that which I in good conscience see as error. I EXPECT the teaching theologians in this institution that we call the ELCA, to TEACH and not tow the party line.
September 4, 2009 at 10:53 am
Exiling Dr Root to his classroom with a gag order is hardly a Lutheran perspective and totally un-American. I have heard many say we stood by quietly without voicing our opinion – guilty! Several years ago in the adult class I lead I uttered the phrase “political correctness gone totally awry.” I hear that sentiment spoken by many others now, but fear that it is rapidly moving downstream as if propelled by a jet engine!
August 28, 2009 at 7:44 pm
Professor Root, I give thanks for your clear head, theological and biblical clarity, and couragous willingness to speak the truth in love. You have not simply called a spade a spade, but in the words of a friend of mine called it what it is … a &*%$ing shovel.
Blessings to you for your voice and clarity.
A former student.
August 29, 2009 at 4:42 am
That’s right: now it moves into teaching. The first action I am going to take is to raise awareness in our congregation of what the CWA has done and its implications for the in-house Augsburg published materials. Specifically with my fellow SS teachers, who are accountable in preserving the faith. We have plenty of sound options. The Institute for Lutheran Theology comes to mind.
August 31, 2009 at 11:51 am
Brian, thanks for that additional resource…I have been wondering where I COULD turn in light of Augsburgs relationship with the ELCA and subject to its CWA actions.
August 29, 2009 at 6:19 am
I will pray for you Dr. Root. IMHO, Joel’s option above will soon become the norm within the church. Now that the advocates have “won,” they will work tirelessly to stifle dissent.
Long term the issue is about teaching. As a generation passes away that was trained to think as Lutheran theologians and is replaced by post-modern, argue from personal experience folks, the ability to produce pastors who can actually think critically about our “place in life” through the lens of scripture, the confessions and a proactive understanding of the paradox will become problematic. The slide away from the historic, orthodox church will accelerate.
August 29, 2009 at 7:55 am
Der Mike,
I fear that your 2am thoughts may be close to correct. The sickness of Lutheranism goes very far back. If Luther’s theology was creative in agood way, and if that of the Lutheran scholastics was fine, that is about the last period in Lutheran history where slogans about “law and gospel” or “justification” were not harmful to the faith.
Jens
August 29, 2009 at 8:45 am
Thank you, Dr. Root, for doing exactly what I expect from a professor of theology and teacher of the Church. I imagine there were a good number who told Luther, “Father Martin, go back to teaching your Bible classes and stop posting your personal opinions on the church door.” I am glad Luther didn’t listen to his critics.
The ELCA is in need of sound theological teaching. I will be interested in reading future posts.
August 29, 2009 at 10:13 am
Hopefully Pr. Brown will offer a tempering of his words, especially in light of a Facebook “conversation” we had when he expressed a similar sentiment to my posting of of the link to Dr. Root’s blog.
Thanks, Dr. Root, I look forward to reading more.
August 29, 2009 at 5:33 pm
At our Synod Gathering this week a colleague of mine said that the reality of “bound conscious” seems to be playing out in a simple phrase that we can all understand, “Shut up and play nice.”
We are not to challenge one another, we are not to redirect benevolence, we are not to do anything that could possibly be construed as standing against the decision of the CWA.
Unfortunately I am afraid that many of us will be called to task for doing just that, dissenting. I can only pray for some Wise Fredericks among us.
Thank you for your words Dr. Root – and blessings to you and to your clarion call.
August 29, 2009 at 9:46 pm
Today, as I was communicating with a Roman Catholic friend, I needed to confess my sadness, distress, and shame over the actions of our denomination. I, too, think that we have abrogated our theological heritage, our oneness with the “… one holy catholic and apostolic church …,” and have become an occasion for scandal for people seeking spiritual wholeness. In abandoning the canonical form of the scriptures as the norm for our faith, life, and practice we have become an apostate church. RCIA anyone?
August 30, 2009 at 3:18 am
Thank you Dr. Root for starting this site, we need it. I think some of us are wondering if within Lutheranism there is not a recessive antinomian gene that keeps showing its ugly face throughout history. It does seem to me that the most pressing item right now is to give a theological and ecclesiastical framework for the discussion going on in Lutheran CORE that will lead up to the September national gathering. I am also aware that the crisis in the ELCA expression of Lutheranism can benefit from the Lutheran developing world perspective.
August 30, 2009 at 1:51 pm
Thank you D. Root. I need trusted voices to speak out, as I struggle with these issues, not just as a pastor but as a person of faith.
August 30, 2009 at 4:55 pm
Dr. Root, your point three is gut puncher for me… when I first learned _theologica crucis_ and of the Lutheran similitudes under Hank Kadai it was refreshing stuff in the midst of Springfield Sem’s theological stuffiness… Your “Work of Christ and the deconstruction etc.” devastes my remembrances and use of these strains pastorally over the years… While you argue their thin use in Luther, can they be used wisely as new Lutheran thought as well as a flimsy basis for some our present weak footings? Harvey Mozolak
August 30, 2009 at 7:21 pm
Thank you Dr. Root for leading this discussion and for standing firm in the historic, catholic and apostolic faith. Thank you Nathan Hilkert for posting the link to this blog on Facebook. I frankly was appalled to read so few responses, pro or con, this week by my colleagues to the actions taken by the CWA. It seems that now we are beginning to find our voices.
This morning, as I was standing before the altar leading the prayers of the people to God, I was overcome with such a deep sense of grief and shame at what our denomination has done that the words simply would not come. What prayer can I possibly utter that adequately expresses or explains to God what we have done?
And now we are being asked to play nice together as if this were some sporting event where the winners and the losers all shake hands after the game and go out to have a few beers together. That attitude would have us believe that it is only a group of people who have lost, but I maintain that the argument is fundamentally flawed, for it is not a group of people who have lost, but rather it is the cause of the proclamation of the gospel and our life together as a community that lives into the gospel proclamation that have been damaged.
As one of you so astutely observed, it is now the teaching of Lutheran theology that will be affected. Perhaps the task that lies before us now is to begin the process of teaching our congregations exactly what the far-reaching ramifications of these decisions are, and the effects that they will have on our life of faith.
Not only have we gone from Luther’s doctrine of ‘sola scriptura’ to a new doctrine of ‘sorta scriptura,’ but the ELCA has also declared that it is now possible to change any doctrine or dogma of the church by a simple majority vote. All we have to do, we now discover, is to gather enough folks together in a room, have a straight up or down vote, and we can declare the divinity of Jesus to be null and void. I know, let’s make it easy for those who can’t grasp the concept of one God in three persons and do away with the doctrine of the Trinity.
August 31, 2009 at 4:33 pm
Evidently the only one who can have voice are those who disagree with what the way 2009 CWA voted. I understand that your bound conscience says that the ELCA has strayed, but how can we live into that difference and continue to be church.
August 31, 2009 at 5:28 pm
As far as I can see now, the ELCA can “live into” these decisions only if it is willing think through ways of living in impeded, or impaired, or partial communion within its own life. We will have to see.
You are certainly free to have a voice here.
Michael Root
August 31, 2009 at 8:01 pm
Joel,
I am still waiting for your response to my question as to whether you were joking in your first post. I was seriously asking if you were joking. Because if you weren’t, then you could have only been issuing a threat.
August 31, 2009 at 8:15 pm
Not sure HOW you consider ANY of that a threat, and I was serious. Conversation is good, but evidently only for the dissenting. Peace, out!
September 1, 2009 at 7:46 pm
Joel,
Let me quote you:
“I wish to remind you, Mr. Root, that we are not to speak ill of the ELCA.”
“As a current professor of Southern Seminary, unless you have tendered your resignation, we are called to speak well of each other.”
“I hope, as a called faculty member of Southern Seminary, you keep personal opinions to yourself and teach the Systematic Theology class to which you have been called.”
To paraphrase: “You had better not express a differing opinion, Mr. Root, or you may well lose your job with the ELCA.”
That’s HOW, Joel.
Joel, your comments sound like something Dean Wormer from “Animal House” would say.