Thursday, December 15, 2011

Luther Rocks: Purely Intentional?
Check Out His Link



Luther Rocks: Purely Intentional?:


WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2011

Purely Intentional?
Some of the upcoming installments of the current series I have been posting will get more into music theory.  It will talk about unresolved cadences; chord progressions that don't make sense on the surface; chord selection; rhythm selection and the hypnotic affect of all this through repetition.

While driving to and from work lately, I have been listening to CCM again.  It has been research time well spent in the light of this BWBW series.  This morning I listened to Third Day's cover of O Come All Ye Faithful.  The original setting of the song (in all the hymnals) is in a major key and an anthem that will be sung in many churches on Christmas Eve and Day.  But the Third Day version isn't the same joyful from the opening downbeat to the ending, at least from a musical perspective.  In fact I found it quite striking that the words 'joyful' and 'Christ' are sung over minor chords.  The phrases are major except for the minor chord which enters and departs quickly and subtly.  Why would they do that?  So it really got me to thinking.  I Googled some things regarding Third Day and this interesting web page came up.  It makes you think.  The Third Day song is posted below.  You be the judge.


'via Blog this'

Florida governor calls for suspension of Florida A&M president over hazing death, fraud probe - The Washington Post

Florida governor calls for suspension of Florida A&M president over hazing death, fraud probe - The Washington Post:

GJ - When will WELS call off their secret hazing ritual at Mequon - GA?

They hazed six chosen students this year, as reported by...

I forget.

'via Blog this'

Intrepid Lutherans: Rebuking and Correcting the Church Growth Movement.
GJ - Better Late Than Never



Intrepid Lutherans: Rebuking and Correcting the Church Growth Movement:


Rebuking and Correcting the Church Growth Movement

We found this post on Brothers of John the Steadfast very edifying, and they have been kind enough to let us repost it here. There are many parallels between what has happened in the LCMS and what has happened in the WELS with respect to the Church Growth Movement. One difference is that the WELS never toyed around too seriously with the historical-critical method, so it never needed to be debunked in the WELS, which means there was never a "void" left to be filled by something else. So what is our excuse for letting in all this non-Lutheran CGM stuff? [GJ - The answer is that the WELS leaders all studied CG at Fuller with Missouri, the ELS, and ELCA. They all share the same doctrinal foundation: forgiveness without the Word, Enthusiasm. But boy oh boy are they unforgiving!]


---


Five Simple Scriptural Truths that Rebuke and Correct the Church Growth Movement, by Pr. Rossow
December 14th, 2011 Post by Pastor Tim Rossow


I am convinced that the church growth movement is harmful for the church. Some of you may ask “What is the church growth movement?“ It is a way of “doing” church that arose in the 1970’s and 80’s. By the middle of the 80’s it was being taught at the St. Louis Seminary.

On a benign level it is the application of common sense to the parish in order to make sure that we are doing our best for the Lord’s church and with an eye toward growth. For instance, if people are driving right past your church on a Sunday morning because your parking lot is full, it would be good to rally the parishioners around the goal of raising funds to increase parking.

The church growth movement harms the church when it extends the reach of reason to the point of compromising the Scriptural and Confessional approach to the Lord’s church. This faulty way of applying church growth methods took hold among the LCMS movers and shakers as a natural filling of the void left when the historical-critical method of understanding the Bible (liberalism’s use of reason to question the truth of the Scriptures) was debunked in the synod in the early 1970’s. It is as if a certain element in the church learned from the battle for the Bible that it was wrong to apply reason to critique Scripture but that they did not fully realize nor have the depth of thought to reject the use of the whore reason (one of Luther’s favorite phrases) when it is applied to church practice. This move was aided by the American’s love for its only indigenous philosophy – Pragmatism, which asserts that whatever works is true. Countless parishes in the LCMS today are organized around this false use of reason and practicality.

Here are five common examples of how this is practiced in the LCMS today and simple Scriptural truths that rebuke and correct such false uses of reason.
The tiresome and unending over-emphasis on personal evangelism. There is not even one single Scripture in the New Testament that mandates or even exhorts one to personal, lay evangelism. (If you can find one, please share it with us in the comment section below.) Another way of saying this is to reject the false assertion that the main thing the church is to do is to grow. No, the main thing the church is to do is to be steadfast and faithful (Colossians 1:23).

We need to love people to Christ (in other words, doctrine and teaching turn people off). The Church is not about loving people to Christ – the Bible says we are to love the brothers and respect the world. It is an error of liberalism to supplant the preaching of the forgiveness of sins with peace and justice for all. Search the Scriptures and you will see that when the Bible speaks of acts of mercy it overwhelmingly is speaking about love for the brothers and sisters in the body of Christ. A few years ago I read through the entire Scriptures with an eye toward recording all of the incidents where Christians were exhorted to show mercy and compassion. Clearly over 90% of the passages were about showing mercy to those in the body of Christ. The classic statement of this is in I Peter 2:17 where it says “honor everyone, love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the emperor.” Our concern for the world is expressed in honor. Our concern for fellow Christians is expressed in love. This applies to the worn out passage about the priesthood of all believers. It is not so much about personal evangelism as it is about being respectful in the culture. Read I Peter 2 carefully and you will see that we are to be respectful and decent in the world so that the pagans cannot hold our disrespectful behavior against the Gospel that is preached from our pulpits. It is hardly an exhortation to knock on doors for Jesus. (Knocking on doors is not necessarily a bad idea – it is just not emphasized in Scripture like it is by the synodocrats of the last decade.)

The Bible teaches that where two or three are gathered together there is a small group. Actually, where two are three are gathered together, according to Christ’s own word, is not a small group but is an assembly of the congregation with the authority to excommunicate someone. The passage of note is Matthew 18:15-20. Yes, this is the infamous Matthew 18 passage. Verse 20 speaks about two or three being gathered and it is included in the passage on rebuking sin. It is not an exhortation to small group meetings. Allow me to rescue it from infamy and bring it back down to the voters assembly where it belongs. Do the math. When your brother sins against you and will not repent go get one more and give it another try. When he still won’t repent go get one or more in addition and give it one more try. Now we are starting to see how Jesus intends us to understand “where two or three are gathered.” The three or more are the church. In verse seventeen Jesus tells the church that they have the authority to treat someone like a tax collector (excommunicate them) and since that is a scary prospect he encourages them by saying “wherever two or more of you are gathered in my name to do this scary thing, I am there with you.” The misuse of this passage to support “small group ministry” is a classic case of the church growth movement abusing Scripture. I cannot tell you how many times I have had people throw this verse at me in defense of small groups. Church growth advocates don’t like excommunication because it tends to shrink the church. But Christ’s words about two or three gathering together are about exactly that, gathering the church together to make the last attempt to love the brother via excommunication (i.e. to wake them up out of the slumber of their unrepented sin).
WELS figures that weeds will go away on their own.
Check out Fox Valley, Kudu Don Patterson, just about everywhere.

Doctrine divides and turns people off. Touching people’s emotions works better than teaching them doctrine. This of course is the principal that is used to support the singing of popular American Evangelical songs in place of the old, boring, stuffy doctrinal hymns out of the hymnal. I encourage you to read the epistles of Paul and do a comparison of the number of times Paul encourages people to learn and grow in knowledge (doctrine) versus the number of times he encourages them to grow in their emotional attachment to Jesus. (Does he ever do that? I can’t think of a single case but I am happy to learn and I am sure you will be happy to teach in the comment section below.)

Everyone is a Minister. The Pastor is a player-coach and his vocation is essentially the same as every other Christ. Pastors are unique. Their work is unique. There is not a single New Testament Scripture about the laity teaching (the proper work of the pastor) but there are dozens of Scriptures about pastors being given the vocation of preacher/teacher (not to mention the first two entries in the Small Catechism’s table of duties). This does not mean that we are not to have an educated laity. To the contrary, the preachers are teaching the laity. The laity are to learn (see #4 above). Learning doctrine is crucial for the church to be faithful. It’s just that everyone is not a teacher in the church.

I did not go searching for these principals. They began to strike me in the last twenty years or so once I took off the synodcrat glasses and started reading the Scriptures for what they say and in the manner that they are read by the Confessors.

BTW, speaking of reading the Scriptures as the Confessors did, here is a sixth bonus debunked principal:
Predestination is a harmful, dangerous topic that ought to be avoided. Do a word search on “predestined,” “election,” and the like in your Bible and you will find that it is a prominent and important topic in the Scriptures. Read Luther’s Bondage of the Will and you will begin to see how false and bankrupt the American Evangelical approach is to Scripture, conversion, growing the church and Christian piety in general. Sadly the American Evangelical approach has overrun the minds of many of our pastors. The Scriptural teaching of eternal election properly highlights the monergism of God and leaves our pragmatic approach to life in the church in the lurch. We are not to “do church” in a practical way. We are to do church in a faithful way. We preach his word to those that like it and those that like it not and God sorts out the rest. This does not entirely rule out practicality or growth, but growth and practicality do not order the way we do things in Christ’s church.

'via Blog this'

***
Kent Hunter was teaching the LCMS DPs
when Al Barry and Paul McCain were running the show.
Neither one stood up against Church Growth, DP Benke, or
congregations belonging to Willow Creek - another denomination.
Yes, I met Kent on his way INTO the Purple Palace for that meeting.

GJ - I am not at all impressed with "Steadfast Lutherans," but I am glad the Intrepids are belling the cat in WELS.

I discovered the sound of one hand clapping when I published about 300 articles in Christian News against Church Growth in WELS, the LCMS, and the Little Sect on the Prairie. Herman Otten responded by selling  Valleskey's Church Growth textbook as a doctrinal book.

LCMS-NALC Discussions


NALC-LCMS Discussion Group.
Lutheran Church in Canada, too, eh?


LCMS-NALC Discussions:

On 15 – 16 December 2011, representatives from The Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod (LCMS) and the North American Lutheran Church (NALC) held discussions in Saint Louis, MO, at the LCMS International Center. NALC Participants included Bishop John Bradosky, Dr. James Nestingen, Bishop Emeritus Paull Spring, Rev. Dave Wendel (Chair of Ecumenical Relationships Committee). LCMS participants included President Matthew Harrison, Vice-President Herb Mueller, Dr. Albert Collver, Director of Church Relations, Dr. Joel Lehenbauer, Executive Director of the CTCR, Rev. Larry Vogel, CTCR Staff, and Rev. John Pless, Professor at Concordia Theological Seminary in Fort Wayne. Rev. Dr. Robert Bugbee, President of the Lutheran Church Canada (LCC) attended the LCMS-NALC discussions as an observer.

'via Blog this'

Mid-Week Advent Service.
John 1:19-28

By Norma Boeckler


Mid-Week Advent Vespers


The Christmas Eve service will be at 7 PM Central.
We will be traveling south to be with our son’s family on Christmas Day,
so there will not be a Christmas Day service.

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 7 PM Phoenix Time

The Hymn # 552                 Abide with Me            2:11
The Order of Vespers                                             p. 41
The Psalmody                   Psalm 92                    p. 143
The Lection                            John 15:1-10

The Sermon Hymn #645            Behold a Branch            2:2

The Sermon – Pointing to Christ

The Prayers
The Lord’s Prayer
The Collect for Grace                                            p. 45
 The Hymn # 558     All Praise to Thee               2.9

KJV John 1:19 And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? 20 And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ. 21 And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No. 22 Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself? 23 He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias. 24 And they which were sent were of the Pharisees. 25 And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet? 26 John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; 27 He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose. 28 These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing.

Pointing to Christ


John 1:19 And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou? 20 And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ.

After the previous sermon about John the Baptist, someone said that others foolishly said this – John sent disciples to Jesus because he had lost faith while in prison. That contradicts the plain message of the passage, Matthew 11:2ff. Jesus said John was “more than a prophet,” not the kind of commendation given to someone who lost faith in the Savior.

The faith of John is emphasized in this Gospel lesson for the Fourth Sunday in Advent.
It is from the Gospel of Faith.

John the Baptist had a following, so the religious leaders came to him, asking about his intentions. The civilized world was looking for the Savior, and the Jewish people were especially aware of the predictions about this figure. The throne had passed from the House of David, which was a key sign, since Herod was on the throne. The Star of Bethlehem was seen at the time of Jesus’ birth. Anyone who could count might wonder when the adult Messiah would appear.

John the Baptist reminded everyone of the Old Testament prophets, because he commanded people to repent of their sins and believe in the Savior.

John clearly told the religious leaders, “I am not the Christ.” The tradition then was to anoint the head of the king with oil when he was crowned. That is done with the king or queen of England to this day. (The royal fish is used – whale oil. All whales stranded on the shore belong to the crown.) The word for anointed with oil is Messiah in Hebrew, Christ in Greek. Both are shorthand for The King Anointed with Oil. The Anointed signifies this special figure.

Anointing is now abused by the Enthusiasts as a term to promote whatever they do. Their plays, dramas, and music are “anointed,” meaning “anointed with the Holy Spirit.” They never tire of divorcing the Holy Spirit from the Word. A better commendation would be “faithful to the Word.”

John’s role was not to point to himself but to point to Christ.

21 And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? [Elijah] And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No.  Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself? He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias.

Elijah would have been a definite choice, since Elijah was taken up into heaven. He was considered a forerunner to the Messiah.

That prophet was another one expected to appear just before the Messiah began his work. There are large books about Messianic expectations of the time, many of them based upon paradise on earth or freedom from Roman occupation. The political or military expectations led to two revolts after the time of Christ, the Zealot revolt and the Bar Kochba revolt, which led to Jews being banned from the remnants of Jerusalem.

The whole area was laid waste because of false expectations and the power of the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire was defeated only by the Herman the German, luxury, and decadence. Luxury and decadence were the most powerful destructive forces of all.

John identified his mission with Isaiah 40 – the voice of one crying in the desert – Prepare the way of the Lord.

In ancient times (and even in modern times) special efforts were made for the visitation of the monarch. Our imperial president arrives in town and all traffic is stopped at the airport, all streets closed that might interfere with his travel. Every building is prepared. Windows are sealed shut along a parade route. Manhole covers are welded shut.

An imperial train traveled over rough roads in ancient times, so every effort was made to prepare the route, to offer the best possible experience for someone with god-like power.

John was preparing his community for the real Lord. It was essential to get them to begin listening to a faithful prophet, so they would listen to the Gospel of Christ. We heard someone like that many years ago. He was specifically in charge of cleaning things up. He gave a sermon where he identified (not by name) major Christian leaders who were violating the Sixth Commandment. He described a large congregation where every staff member was committing adultery and confessed to it. He was a religious version of the FBI.

But John did not just preaching the Law. He pointed people to the Christ.

24 And they which were sent were of the Pharisees. 25 And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet? 26 John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not; 27 He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose. 28 These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing.

Notice how many Christian leaders point everyone to themselves. They say, “Look at this building I built. Look at the acres of parking lots. Look at all the money we take in.”

What do we find in the Book of Concord and Luther’s writing? They are not concerned with institutions and numbers, but with the Gospel of Christ. If we summarized all the faithful books of those Lutheran Reformation leaders in a phrase, it would be “Here is the Christ. Here is forgiveness. Believe in Him.”

Someone wrote me that a pastor “does not agree with you.” I said, “It only matters if he agrees with the Scriptures and the Book of Concord.” When we start making a person or a denomination the standard, the Word of God is forgotten. People and institutions by nature protect themselves from imagined harm. The Word of God cannot be harmed or damaged in any way.

“Heaven and earth will pass away but My Word shall never pass away.”

It is true that people can twist the Word, but they do that at their own risk. Playing with the divine power of the Word is like the people who play with explosives, thinking they will do some damage. They often leave very little evidence behind of their futile efforts. One man set down a bomb in front of a house. They found his arms and nothing else, because the trigger was too sensitive. Obama’s best friend lost his girlfriend when she blew up an entire brownhouse while working on a bomb meant for others.

The Word remains even if only a few trust its message. But that message is plain and clear for all – Trust in Jesus for righteousness, for He speaks forgiveness in our ears.

I just finished a class last night. The members were supposed to reflect on Psalm 119. It made me sad, because there was so much Law in all those messages, as if being Christian meant obeying, commitment, and keeping all promises. By that I mean Christianity as obedience alone.

I said to them, “We are all born condemned by unbelief. The purpose of the Christian faith is to show us how to find forgiveness for our sins. All ministry is a proclamation of the Gospel of forgiveness, which comes to us through the Word.”


Lobbying for the Faithful: Religious Advocacy Groups in Washington, D.C. - Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life

Lobbying for the Faithful: Religious Advocacy Groups in Washington, D.C. - Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life:



The number of organizations engaged in religious lobbying or religion-related advocacy in Washington, D.C., has increased roughly fivefold in the past four decades, from fewer than 40 in 1970 to more than 200 today. These groups collectively employ at least 1,000 people in the greater Washington area and spend at least $390 million a year on efforts to influence national public policy. As a whole, religious advocacy organizations work on about 300 policy issues. For most of the past century, religious advocacy groups in Washington focused mainly on domestic affairs. Today, however, roughly as many groups work only on international issues as work only on domestic issues, and nearly two-thirds of the groups work on both. These are among the key findings of a new study by the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life that examines a total of 212 religion-related advocacy groups operating in the nation’s capital.

The study finds that about one-in-five religious advocacy organizations in Washington have a Roman Catholic perspective (19%) and a similar proportion are evangelical Protestant in outlook (18%), while 12% are Jewish and 8% are mainline Protestant. But many smaller U.S. religious groups, including Baha’is, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs, also have established advocacy organizations in the Washington area. In fact, the number of Muslim groups (17) is about the same as the number of mainline Protestant groups (16). And the largest category today is interreligious: One-quarter of the groups studied (54) either represent multiple faiths or advocate on religious issues without representing a specific religion.

This report is based on a systematic examination of the websites, mission statements, tax documents and other public records of religious advocacy groups spanning the years 2008-2010. Researchers also relied on responses to a written questionnaire that was sent to 148 separate, active groups included in the study and completed by 61 of them. Additionally, lead researcher Allen D. Hertzke conducted in-depth interviews with leaders of 36 groups and observed the advocacy efforts of many other groups at congressional hearings, lobby days, press conferences and other Washington-based events.


'via Blog this'

Mid-Week Service Tonight, Thursday, 7 PM Central


Team Jackson forgot about what day of the week it was yesterday. I was finishing up classes at one university, posting and grading, plus handling my other two classes. The strange thing about online classes is that they are seven day jobs. There is always something to do.

So I am conducting the mid-week Advent service tonight.

I apologize for keeping people waiting and wondering. They call it a "Bella Vista moment" here, but the moment lasted all day.