Monday, September 17, 2012

VirtueOnline - News

PB Schori and another dude.


VirtueOnline - News:

"My job is too big for one man, said the Archbishop of Canterbury as he was packing his bags ready to leave Lambeth Palace. Earlier he told The Telegraph that he had "failed to crack it."

The outgoing leader of the world's 77 million Anglicans suggested a form of job sharing after admitting that he had failed to do enough to prevent a split over homosexuality.

Dr. Williams said a new role should be created to oversee the day to day running of the global Anglican Communion, leaving future Archbishops of Canterbury free to focus on spiritual leadership and leading the Church of England.

In his last major interview before stepping down later his year, he acknowledged that he had struggled to balance the growing demands of the job at home and abroad. He also admitted he had "disappointed" both liberals and conservatives.

VOL: Job sharing. Lord Carey never said it was needed when he was ABC and neither has any archbishop in history suggested it was needed. Does Dr. Williams really think that this would resolve the problems of the office of ABC when most of the Global South, who make up the vast majority of the Anglican Communion, said the real problem was HIM."

'via Blog this'

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "VirtueOnline - News":

Ichabod -

I didn't know that these Episcopalians were into Halloween. Such bright and colorful costumes!

However, I hope they don't wear that garb Halloween night in the streets and scare all those children. Maybe they can have their private party, as I think from the pic, they are quite capable of doing.........

***

GJ - Check out Bad Vestments for the very worst in clerical garb.

Frank Lee Garish

The Christian Message: Part 1: The false teaching which molests the faith of Christians

The Christian Message: Part 1: The false teaching which molests the faith of Christians:


Part 1: The false teaching which molests the faith of Christians


What is the false teaching which molests the faith of Christians?

"Universal objective justification" is that false teaching which makes Christ's Atonement [Cross sacrifice] and subsequent Resurrection, a “be all” and “end all.” The false teaching essentially says that because of Christ’s all-encompassing sacrifice for human sin; that (by that action) God wiped the “world’s slate” free from sin and its eternal consequences.

Therefore, God no longer holds against the individual sinner, his sins. And, since, by Calvary’s supreme sacrifice, Christ made full satisfaction [atonement] for all human sin; past, present and future; therefore the individual sinner is acquitted of God's eternal judgment on account of his sins against God, his fellowman and all of God’s commandments.

This teaching comprises a forensic and judicial aspect. It is philosophical in nature and not practical. It’s a simplistic tool (devoid of faith) of explaining certain Scriptures which don’t jive with other Scriptures. But, that does not matter to these Universalism enthusiasts; because the Scriptures which deal with faith, belief and the Holy Spirit, are only sub level Scriptures subservient to this almighty pedestal universal [objective] justification teaching of God’s acquittal of the sinner by Christ’s sacrifice.

How is this this false Universalism teaching disseminated?

First of all, it is disseminated from youth up. Christian elementary (parochial) schools seed this teaching from pre-school on. Children are continually reminded that Jesus loves them no matter what they do; no matter how bad they've been. Coupled with this [eternal security type of "sovereign immunity" environment] there is little if no teaching about sorrow over personal sin; repentance over it or faith and belief. The central teaching always returns to the forgiveness aspect; without any personal responsibility taught and laid upon the child. If faith is even mentioned, it is pushed into the background as it isn't something of necessity or something to be cherished. This web author and emeritus pastor has documented such at his [own] grandson's school. This parochial school is a fine Christian school and much better alternative than a public school; but, the central teaching of the Christian Faith is diminished as Luther modeled it be taught, - grace through faith; and that we are justified (before God) by faith alone:

"Pastor Nathan Bickel on UOJ in WELS......."

Secondly, this Universal justification teaching is subtly and weekly reenacted in umpteen Christian church services. Sung (“liturgy”) portions have the congregation singing: "Oh Lamb of God; you take away the sin of the world; have mercy on us....." [Note: Mind you - "take away" – is not the best translation from the New Testament Greek; rather - "take up; bare"] This part of the liturgy (singing worship service), in some churches, follows the congregational assembly, confessing their sins in the corporate confessional prayer; followed by the pastor's announcement of forgiveness to them, - i.e., “in the stead and by the command of the Lord; ‘I forgive you all your sins.’”

Next, the attending church members hear the "universal objective justification" enthusiast, pastor's sermon; laced with an average sermon’s usual illustrations; sometimes one, in particular (right at the beginning) which is carried throughout the sermon as a non Scriptural theme, from the beginning, to the bitter end of the homily.

During the sermon the pastor expresses the “UOJ” (universal objective justification) "forgiveness" part. This aspect is especially appealing to the church member who puts on his Sunday best foot forward after neglecting God all week in his work, home environment and entertainment play. This grabs his particular attention as he then can forget about buying all those winless lottery tickets which weekly frustrates him as he covets his neighbors' and others' financial successes.

As the sermon winds down and the church member looks at his cell phone digital time; he readies himself to rise from his pew seat. This is about the point where the pastor ends the sermon appealing to the church member to do something. After spending most of the sermon time preaching cheap Universalism grace to the audience; the pastor quickly finishes off his sermon by exhorting his church members to proclaim "the universal forgiveness message" to (their) neighbors that God has forgiven them their sins. This is how church members are to be Christian witnesses in their local sphere of influence; at work and in the marketplace; – especially their next-door neighbors.

Can you imagine telling some of your troubled, agitating and harassing neighbors that God has already forgiven them of all their sins? I know one thing. If I would do that with certain of my neighbors; - that (simplistic) message would only reinforce their recalcitrant untoward (sinful) behaviors! In short, Christian witness to the Universalist, is reduced to a formula driven pronouncement - not a Holy Spirit / Scriptural led and driven type of witness.

Following the sermon, congregational members receive the Lord's Supper (Communion). Translation: (with the aforementioned context) - i.e, they are good to go for the rest of the week; or, until they repeat the same, two week's later, suited up in their Sunday best.

The Universalism (objective justification) teaching doesn’t mesh with Christ’s encounter with the Jewish religious leaders of His day

John 8:1f – Jesus to the religious Jews

Jesus speaks very plainly with these unbelieving Jews. [John 8:1f] He tells them point blank that they will not be going where He will be going. He ends up telling that that they will be damned in their sins if they do not believe that He is the promised Messiah.

Acts 2:1f – Peter’s Sermon

Fast forward now, to Peter speaking, after the Holy Spirit descended at Pentecost. [Acts 2:1f] I think that it can be assumed that in this crowd were some of the same unbelieving Jews whom Jesus had encountered. Peter directs his sermon to this (non-born from above) unbelieving crowd.

What did the Holy Spirit blessed, Apostle Peter, say to these unbelieving Jews?

37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do? 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. 39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call. 40 And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation. 41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls. [Acts 2:37-41]

Keep in mind what Jesus had said to these same Jews or similar unbelieving Jews:

"Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world. I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins." - John 8:23-24

Now, please tell me - you who advocate and promulgate universal objective justification; how could these Jews ever "die in their sins" if they were [had been] forgiven and acquitted of the eternal judgment of those sins by Christ's Atonement and subsequent [certifying] Resurrection? Please don’t tell me that Christ had not been sacrificed as yet; and, had not risen from the dead yet - because the Apostle Peter encountered some of these same Jews, and / or similar unbelieving Jews, following Christ's (sacrifice) death and resurrection.

Furthermore, why would these [supposed] “universally justified” [acquitted of their sins] Jews, need to be preached to by the Apostle Peter? [Acts 2:1f] Why would they need to "repent?" Why would they need to be baptized to wash away sins of which they had been supposedly "acquitted?" [Been, absolved of; forgiven] Why would the Apostle Peter earnestly urge them to "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins," if they had [already] possessed God's (previous) acquittal?

Jesus encounter with Nicodemus

Look now at John 3: 1-21 – a chapter with which universal objective justification adherents have a difficult time. In fact, I haven’t witnessed them touching this string of passages [verses] in context. They won’t; else they would have to acknowledge personal belief [faith] and the Holy Spirit’s paramount role and activity creating that faith:

John 3:3 – “Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”

Note: “Born again” is not the best translation for "again." Better yet, is “born from above.” Or, "born, anew"]

"....Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again. The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit....." - John 3:5-8 - [KJV]

Now, we have the “transitional verse:”

"Nicodemus answered and said unto him, How can these things be?" - John 3:9

It is here where Jesus ends up telling Nicodemus “how” all this takes place:

".....And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. - John 3:14-15

The “individuals” who, looked up at that brazen serpent, did not die from their poison snake bites, because they heeded the instruction of Moses [Numbers 21:8-9]. And, in like manner, those, who, in faith, believe in Christ, [looking to him] will not spiritually die; but have eternal life! How does this take place? Back up to the previous verses and the whole account of Jesus and Nicodemus.

See also: Acts 8:37 – what Philip tells the Ethiopian eunuch about believing. Also: Acts 16:30-31 ; Hebrews 10:39 ; 1 John 5:1 ; 1 John 5:11-13

The falsehood promulgated by Universalism Justification Disciples is compounded because they do not understand the Holy Spirit’s work in the sinner and His “time-line.” They, rather, make up their own, when explaining how a human soul is justified [made right / forgiven / acquitted by God]

I like what the post Martin Luther protestant reformer, stated:

“Although Christ has acquired for us the remission of sins, justification and sonship, God just the same does not justify us prior to our faith. Nor do we become God's children in Christ in such a way that justification in the mind of God takes place before we believe.”

[Abraham Calov - as he is quoted in: Apodixis Articulorum Fedei, Lueneburg, 1684

Amen.

Note: Part 2 is to follow the above topical message:

Part 2 - How does the false teaching of universal objective justification molest Christians’ faith?

Above Message and Related Scriptures [below] -- Intended to be utilized in a simpleworship format:

Also: For a couple of other (more formal) worship formats:
The Order of Morning Service
The Order of Matins

Related Scriptures


Salvation - John 1:12-13 ; James 1:18 ; Matthew 16:17 ; Ephesians 2:4-5 ; Ephesians 2:8-10 ; 1 Peter 1:3 ; 1 Peter 1:23 ; Colossians 1:20-21 ; John 3:5-8 ; John 6:65 ; 2 Thessalonians 2:13-14 ;Romans 8:29-31 ; Romans 9:15-18 ; Titus 3:3-7 ; Philippians 2:13 ;1 John 5:4 ; 1 Peter 1:5 ; Hebrews 2:3

See also: John 3:1-21 ; Titus 3:5 ; Ephesians 2:8-10 ; John 1:12;131Corinthians 2:12 ; 1 Corinthians 6:11 ; 1 John 5:1

Please note the above Scriptures - The saving of one's soul, is entirely, the work of the gracious Good Lord.


_____________________________________


Of Whom Does the Prophet Speak" -- by Victor Buksbazen -- an in-depth view of Isaiah 53:1-12 and the prophecy of Christ, hundred of years before his birth. Isaiah 53:1-12 underscores the truthfulness of Divine Revelation as exemplified in the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures.


The Christian Faith: Parts 1-3


Please Note: Topical Christian Messages, by subject


Pastor (Emeritus) Nathan Bickel

Please also note:

The "Words in Season" topical messages and related worship formatare not intended to discourage or replace the Christian worship and assembly of Christians at their particular places of church worship. As this website's author, it is my prayer and hope, that many souls will find the topical messages and related worship format and other material, a useful and valuable Christian resource.


'via Blog this'

Surprise Visitor at the Architect's Lecture

Alice Walton thanked Mrs. I and me for serving as volunteers.

My wife and I are volunteers to greet people at various lectures. Once I offered to be the bouncer, but the crowd was rather tame for that session. Yesterday I took on the coffee and tea table, little realizing they would serve fresh gourmet cookies from the restaurant.

I was managing the refreshments like a boss when I looked up to see Alice Walton. Chris and I both thanked her, because the family donation is a constant source of education, relaxation, and inspiration for both of us. It was a good thing I finished my cookies already. Crumbs have a way of flying when talking.

Alice thanked us for volunteering. LI said he has never met a Walton family member one-on-one.

The Walton children grew up taking care of the Walton Five and Dime in downtown Bentonville. It was a tiny store, now a museum and vistors' center for Walmart.

They decided to dedicate the family land near Crystal Creek, giving the community something of lasting value. Alice spear-headed the project,  much criticized for buying art and arranging for joint-ownership of one large collection. The result of this spree was giving needed cash to various museums. Any single Walton could have done this and locked up the paintings for private viewing only. Instead, they gave them to the community, making Crystal Bridges a destination for everyone who loves art.



The $1.2 billion American art museum forms bridges
across Crystal Creek, where the Walton children used to play.
They donated their family land and the money to build this for NW Arkansas.

http://www.marlonblackwell.com/

This little Orthodox church is off I-540 on the way to Fayetteville.
They wanted a low cost alteration to their tiny church, low budget.
The inside is so attractive that we want to visit it.
Marlon Blackwell spoke yesterday. He is not the main architect for Crystal Bridges but was invited to design the gift store after CB was already under construction.

We were there early, as required, so we met Marlon before he spoke, trading stories about the hazards of book publishing.

This is not the ordinary gift store.
Crystal Bridges.

The wood above was cut by computer so it would fit and still be low cost.
Crystal Bridges gift store.

UOJ Rejects the Entire Gospel of John While Distorting John 1:29

Why not use this citation about St. Bernard by Luther? Anyone is free to copy and share it.
But Pope Paul the Romanist used  for his graphic -
the Miraculous Lactation of Mary into the open mouth of Bernard.

KJV John 6:28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? 29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on Him whom He hath sent.

30 They said therefore unto him, What sign shewest thou then, that we may see, and believe Thee? what dost Thou work? 31 Our fathers did eat manna in the desert; as it is written, He gave them bread from heaven to eat. 32 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Moses gave you not that bread from heaven; but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven.

Jesus did not advise His disciples to believe in the dogma of world absolution, but to trust in Him.

The UOJ fanatics go bonkers at the mention of faith. The Gospel opponents are not content until they have beat down the term faith until it is the shriveled hand grasping the dogma of Hindus saved without faith.

The Gospel of John teaches faith in Jesus more than any other book in the Bible, and it is clearly the work of the disciple Jesus loved.



The Fourth Gospel supplements the first three by giving us essential statements and sermons from Jesus, which are not in the Synoptics. The Gospel of John assumes our knowledge of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. In John, Jesus is not baptized and there is no Last Supper. Those narratives are missing because they are already known. Nevertheless, John's Gospel is filled with sacramental language.

I tutored LI in Latin, using the complete Gospel of John. He had to translate it accurately without notes or any words written above the text. Later, we did the same in Greek. We used Lenski a bit for grammar and the German Schluessel. I also wrote out my own translation of John, during seminary.

SynConference MDivs can babble about UOJ all they want, but there is not a trace of it in the Bible, certainly not in the Gospel of John, where UOJ is refuted with ease.

The Apostle John even gave us a thesis for his Holy Spirit inspired work:

KJV John 20:30 And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of His disciples, which are not written in this book: 31 But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through His Name.

The pivotal statement, from Jesus, is found in John - concerning the work of the Holy Spirit, the work of the true Church. Luther expounded on its meaning.

KJV John 16:8 And when He is come, He will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: 9 Of sin, because they believe not on Me; 10 Of righteousness, because I go to My Father, and ye see me no more; 11 Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.


Reverse engineering this section from John, UOJ is impossible, since forgiveness and faith go together. There is no forgiveness where faith in Christ is lacking.


The UOJ Hive Is Always Trying To Silence Justification by Faith.
Unbelief Hates Faith in Christ.
Comfort from Hitler and Hottentots as Guilt-free Saints? Really?



http://cyberbrethren.com/2012/08/26/the-beauty-comfort-and-power-of-the-doctrine-of-objective-justification/

Pope Paul the Plagiarist wrote:

It has come to my attention that there are some laypeople who read my blog, and follow my Facebook page, who have had the unfortunate experience of stumbling across very negative and harmful discussions on the Internet of what is called the doctrine of “objective justification.” There is a former Lutheran pastor who has made it his life’s mission to attack this comforting doctrine. I urge and warn all those who read this blog and my Facebook page to avoid any such discussions and to flee from any false teachers who would rob you of the comfort of the Gospel. They like to insert themselves everywhere they can on various forums where justification is discussed. Pray for their repentance and restoration to a true and living faith. They are the very kind of persons whom the Apostle warns us about when he urges us to make sure we are “keeping Faith and a good conscience, which some have rejected and suffered shipwreck in regard to their faith” (1 Timothy 1:19). Mark and avoid anyone who casts doubt on the doctrine of objective justification, and particularly mark and avoid any pastor who does so Do not be deceived. Cling to the truth.

Rejoice in this beautiful explanation of the doctrine of objective justification written by the Rev. Dr. Robert Preus, in 1981.

***

GJ - The UOJ Hive always wants to silence the message of justification by faith alone. They like their little dogma, which is a perfect fit for little, unbelieving minds. For those who are not studious and make a career out of copying the work of others, UOJ is perfect. Everyone is forgiven and saved, so it does not matter if Groeschel or the pope is plagiarized. Making money from the work of others, without giving due credit - that is plagiarism.

The quoted portion from the Robert Preus essay is from a little  booklet by Eduard Preuss, an apostate still regarded as a great champion of UOJ, quoted lovingly but dishonestly. No one ever says, "This Concordia Seminary professor became a Roman Catholic professor and published in favor of Roman Catholic dogma for the rest of his life." I consider that a significant detail. Too bad I have owned and read Fuerbring's books (twice), where conversion is described vividly.

Read this as if it appeared the first time in print:
“All this is put beautifully by an old Lutheran theologian of our church, “We are redeemed from the guilt of sin; the wrath of God is appeased; all creation is again under the bright rays of mercy, as in the beginning; yea, in Christ we were justified before we were even born. For do not the Scriptures say: ‘God was in Christ reconciling the world unto Himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them?’’ This is not the justification which we receive by faith…That is the great absolution which took place in the resurrection of Christ. It was the Father, for our sake, who condemned His dear Son as the greatest of all sinners causing Him to suffer the greatest punishment of the transgressors, even so did He publicly absolve Him from the sins of the world when He raised Him up from the dead.” (Edward Preuss, “The Justification of a Sinner Before God,” pp. 14-15)

We are declared forgiven (justified without faith) before we are born? So why are we baptizing babies...or anyone? Original sin has been removed by UOJ, just as it is by the Universalists.

If Lutherans teach infant faith, isn't that bad - because UOJ Enthusiasts always denigrate faith. That is why the SynConference no longer teaches the efficacy of the Word, the Means of Grace, or justification by faith. Their charade is not justification by faith but a cover, a dodge, a camouflage for their one and only dogma.

Read this so-called Scriptural support, endorsed by McCain:
“According to all of Scripture Christ made a full atonement for the sins of all mankind. Atonement (at-one-ment) means reconciliation. If God was not reconciled by the saving work of Christ, if His wrath against sin was not appeased by Christ’’ sacrifice, if God did not respond to the perfect obedience and suffering and death of His Son for the sins of the world by forgiveness, by declaring the sinful world to be righteous in Christ -–if all this were not so, if something remains to be done by us or through us or in us, then there is no finished atonement. But Christ said, “It is finished.” And God raised Him from the dead and justified Him, pronounced Him, the sin bearer, righteous (I Timothy 3:16) and thus in Him pronounced the entire world of sinners righteous (Romans 4:25).

That paragraph contains five examples of if clauses - but are they faithful to the Word of God? Many years later, Robert Preus responded in his book, repudiating the rationalistic and Pietistic drivel of this alleged Scriptural support. In the paragraph just cited, Preus simply engaged in begging the question, a logical fallacy. There is not a fragment of Scriptural exegesis in his supposed support.





Some of the Preus statements in McCain's post are theological face-palms:

“Justification is no more a mere potentiality or possibility than Christ’s atonement. The doctrine of objective justification points to the real justification of all sinners for the sake of Christ’s atoning work “before” we come to faith in Christ.

So McCain believes (by side-stepping the Justification and Rome book) that every single unbeliever is justified without faith before they come to faith?

UOJ and Reformation?
And very definitely the doctrine of objective, or general, justification does not threaten the doctrine of justification through faith in Christ. Rather it is the very basis of that Reformation doctrine, a part of it. For it is the very pardon which God has declared over the whole world of sinners that the individual sinner embraces in faith and thus is justified personally.

There is no scholarly support for this assertion. Luther would certain be shocked to learn this. I have been working on 40 graphics (so far) from the Kregel edition of Luther's Galatians Commentary, one of his finest works, a mature effort produced long after the 95 Theses. I will post a few graphics that show the theme of Galatians and the Reformation.