Friday, March 15, 2013

Upgraded Post from Pastor Nathan Bickel.
Child abuse in Michigan Caro Community Schools: Principal’s political correctness abuse directed against a 9 year old boy | moralmatters.org



Child abuse in Michigan Caro Community Schools: Principal’s political correctness abuse directed against a 9 year old boy | moralmatters.org:


Child abuse in Michigan Caro Community Schools: Principal’s political correctness abuse directed against a 9 year old boy

Not all child abuse is physical. The public educational school industry is a unique environment to visit upon young and innocent minds, emotional and mental abuse. The culture's application of "political correctness" is a manical form of child abuse
Not all child abuse is physical. The public educational school “industry” is a unique environment to visit upon young and innocent minds, emotional, mental and intellectual abuse. The culture’s application of “political correctness” is an insidious form of child abuse. It stomps on children’s free speech expression and indoctrinates them to behold their big Mama government book of political correctness rules.
Abuse can take on many forms. Abuse isn’t restricted to a violent and capricious physical action. It can be abuse by neglect, such as has been reported with the elderly, in medical care facilities. And, abuse isn’t restricted to the aging or to spousal abuse. Abuse can be the withholding of basic human care and compassion to anyone within our neighborly sphere of influence. After all, did not Christ say, “Love your neighbor as yourself?”Which of us would care to (knowingly abuse) ourselves? None of us – that is, if we are all in our right minds.
Unfortunately human abuse in our modern culture has taken on the disguise of applied political correctness in the direct actions of commission and / or omission toward those within one’s sphere of influence. Political correctness is that “perceived” standard of right (from wrong) that is often arbitrary and blindly applied [forced] onto those who have varying different opinions. Political correctness (applied) as a standard (rule of “one size fits all” measurement) ends up being the testy prevailing culture’s substitute for the time tested moral and basic Ten Commandment proper rule and behavior. Hence, political correctness often discriminates against those within its one-way Mack truck road of travel.
Pic of Principal Susan Wright, apparent self-appointed political correctness defender, who by her intolerant and insensitive actions toward a 9 year old child, makes public school taxpayers wonder what type of people are allowed to educate their priceless children. Note: The pic taken from the Caro MI Community Schools website.
Pic of Principal Susan Wright, of Caro Public Schools.  Does she appear as a child abuser? No. She looks “normal.” However, facts tell us that child abuse is not only perpetrated by strangers, but by those who are well known to a child and the child’s family. Above pic taken from the Caro MI Community Schools website.
Furthermore, it is this author’s belief that the 9 year old third grader was abused by the Caro Community Schools principal, Susan Wright, vis-a-vis her actions following the little boy’s cupcake birthday gift to his public school classmates.Unless I am mistaken (and would welcome correction) this child has been suspended from school for no logical, sensible reason. As such (then) added abuse by neglect is “in play.” That’s not even to elaborate upon the emotional damage which most likely has ensued because of the school principal’s abusive rejection of his decorative cupcake gifts to his classmates, of which (event) could have been one of the most happiest moments of this boy’s young life.
___________________
Stephanie has left a comment after the recent previous Moralmatters.org article of:
Stephanie’s comment:
This is insane! He’s a child! Not a gang member or something. Political Correctness is run amuck.  I suggest the school change this absurd policy.
Moralmatters.org replied:
Stephanie -
Thank you for your comment. Yes. What transpired was insane and absurd. And, I think it is a shame that taxpayers would have to pay for this type of incompetence and intolerance visited upon their youth.
Why does media most generally focus cases of child abuse upon religious institutions and not the public school industry? Is it because mainstream media and union teachers are in the same political correctness bed?
What is it with liberal mainstream media that it disproportionately focuses on religious institutional cases of child abuse, [more] than the public school industry? Is it because liberal mainstream media and liberal union teachers are in the same political correctness bed?
I’ve looked at the school policy online. From the very beginning the school principal acted without intellectual thought. [An "educator" - can you believe that?] Her actions toward the little boy were without compassion and basically immoral and unethical. The school policy’s thesis is about, “5205 Possessing, Transporting or Transmitting Dangerous Weapons(Cf. 8300) 5205-2.” I ask the question “Who schooled Ms. Wright?” Why didn’t [and couldn't] she distinguish between the innocent intent of the child and the cold hard text of the school policy?”
Furthermore, it appears that the principal was only interested in following a blind course (school policy) guide because she may have (drummed up in her little mind) that these toy miniature figurine soldiers were “dangerous.” Maybe the principal was having a bad hair day and thought that the toy cupcake decorations would turn into bats and vampires and destroy her primped day’s appearance………
Finally, what bothers me, is, (according to the news reports) this 9 year old boy was sent home with the toy figurine miniature soldiers. Unless I find out, otherwise, I assume that little Hunter was suspended from school. In that case, (more than any other reason), I would believe that the tax paying parents could bring a lawsuit against this unreasonable school district. [I ask myself: "Where are the school board members in all of this? Why do they allow all this? Why do they allow the school's superintendent to go on local network TV to defend the school principal and offer a half-ass apology to those who may have been offended?"
Stephanie - Please check back at Moralmatters.org as I think that you have not read the last of this whole sorted political correctness affair..........
Lansing, Michigan pic of legislator, Mike Green and the parents of the 9 year old school boy abused by the Caro Community Schools. Note the celebration of patriotic cupcakes. Please also note the short video where Mike Green says that little Hunter's decorative cupcakes are always welcomed at his Michigan Senate office.
Lansing, Michigan pic of legislator, Mike Green and the parents of the 9 year old school boy abused by the political correctness of the Caro Community Schools Elementary school principal. Note the Michigan Capital Building celebration of decorative patriotic cupcakes. These 3 people, plus 9 year old Hunter, are normal. They have chosen not to allow the paranoid Caro Community Schools political correctness to skew their view of reality. Also, please note the short video link above, where Senator Green says that little Hunter’s decorative cupcakes are always welcome in his Lansing, Michigan State Capital, Senate office.
________________
Note from this Moralmatters.org author regarding the above article:
Pic of Caro Community Schools Board member Treasurer, Bill Thayer. See his engineering resume here. Perhaps, he can help his school system by helping it to engineer a way out of its political correctness stupor.
Pic of Caro Community Schools Board member Treasurer, Bill Thayer. See his engineering resume here. Perhaps, he can help his school system by helping it to engineer a way out of itspolitical correctness stupor.
For those who would wish, I think that at this time, it would be useless contacting the aforementioned school principal. Principal Susan Wright has made her contention clear. She is entrenched in her politically correct (mind games) world.
For those who desire to voice your sentiments and opinions, please voice by email (or postal letter write them – if you can find their addresses) the School Board Members. They, are the ones to hold the local school system accountable and responsible.
Here, following, is the listing of Board members as per the Caro Community Schools website – and here is the school district’s web page to email each of them. Click here.
John Forshee, President; Dean Tomlinson, Vice-President; Henry Knier, Jr., Secretary; Lisa Graf, Trustee; Bill Thayer, Treasurer; Robert Fetting, Ttustee; Paul Strasz, Trustee
__________________________
Related:
This above pic may be comical. But, its message is reality. The secular religion of political correctness is revered by mass liberal media and the public school industry. It is their way of retraining young and old minds by the propaganda usage of their authority saying what is acceptable and what is not acceptable.
This above pic may be comical. But, its message is reality. The secular religion of political correctness is revered by the mass liberal media and the public school industry. It is their way of training young minds by the propaganda usage of abusive authority, determining and announcing what is acceptable and what is unacceptable. In short, the practice of political correctness is the enemy of free speech – US Constitutional First Amendment rights.
______________________________
Posted by:
Pastor emeritus Nathan M. Bickel
Note: Above pic (s) found on the web. Some of this posting’s pics come from the Caro Community Schools; Caro, MI website.




'via Blog this'

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "Upgraded Post from Pastor Nathan Bickel.Child abus...":

I added an Update to this article this morning. placed it at the very beginning of the [above] article. It reads as follows:

Update Note – March 16, 2013 – 1:00 PM EST - This author just received word from a credible source that Hunter, the 9 year old boy, was not suspended from school, or punished for bringing his politically incorrect cupcakes to school. When you read the following commentary, please keep that in mind as this author based some of his commentary expressed thoughts on that reported assumption. I say “reported” because that’s what the FOX news piece led me to believe [assume].

However, the question needs to be asked: “If Hunter wasn’t suspended and punished by the school; why in the first place was his toy miniature figurine soldier decorative cupcakes made to be the political correctness demons they were apparently made to be?”

Furthermore, if there was a school crime that was committed, then the question to be asked could be: “Who perpetrated the crime – or, the misdeed?” If the 9 year old boy was not sanctioned in some way, then, who was? Could we conclude that the little green men were the heinous assailant perpetrators of “some crime” against the school’s political correctness myopic policy? If those little green men [toy WWII figurines] are the criminals, then it behooves the school to somehow sanction them. Oh! This author now remembers that the school’s sanction may have been, that these little green men were forced against their own will, and removed off the cupcake mounds. This brings to mind another question: “Were the rights of these little green men violated. Or, are they just considered aliens and have no US Constitutional rights?”

It is this author’s opinion that the School Board should make some earnest effort to effect some school policy change, to make Caro Community Schools more credible. This author and Michigan resident, is embarrassed that our taxpayer paid public school system should exercise such incompetence on our tax dime!

***

GJ - I am sure there was a considerable outcry, so the bureaucratic solution was to say it never happened.

I saw this with the WELS Michigan District. When Frosty Bivens told the whole Midland Circuit that he went to Fuller Seminary and learned from it, Seifert (who was there to hear it) said he forgot that. Later, he forgot it again when I brought it up. WELS is perfect because all those episodes never happened.

One pastor told me about the furor when Fuller sent out a list of all the WELS clergy who went there. Later, when I asked the same pastor for those names, he changed the subject. WELS is perfect. It never happened.

Etc. Etc.

Another View of the Jesuit Pope - From an Old-Fashioned Roman Catholic

"Thou art the wind beneath mine alb."
(The Holy Spirit does not allow the pope to err - they claim.)

ON FRANCIS

POSTED BY ANN BARNHARDT - MARCH 14, AD 2013 10:34 AM MST

http://barnhardt.biz/

Let me start with a positive comment. Remember, this is the best I could come up with:
If we had gotten the pope we DESERVE, we would now have Pope Snoop Dogg.

And thus ends the positivity.

Francis, like his homeland of Argentina, is a total disaster. He has overseen the near-total destruction of the Church in Argentina. He hates and despises the Tridentine Mass, which is to say that he hates the Mass - let's not mince words, and is a rabid persecutor of anyone in Argentina who shows ANY signs of tradition. A priest in Argentina literally risks the end of his career if he wears a cassock in public. He has forbidden the Tridentine Mass in Argentina, which is an act of direct disobedience, specifically against the papal decree Summorum Pontificum, but embraces horrific "charismatic" and "Superfun Rockband"-type liturgical sacrilege.

Which brings us to his regard for the papacy, and the Church itself. He said yesterday in his bizarre little speech, again and again, that he was the Bishop of Rome, which is true, but in being the Bishop of Rome the pope is the head of the Universal Church, not just the city of Rome. Francis does not believe this, and even made a reference to the idea that the pope is "first among equals". This means that he regards the Church as a mere loose confederacy, and also that he thinks the Church is, or should be, a democracy. The proof of this is, again, his blatant disobedience to Summorum Pontificum. He will never do anything to clean up the sodomite infiltrators in the Church outside of Rome because he doesn't feel that the pope has any authority outside of Rome. Bottom line here: many bishops and archbishops have been kept in line over the past eight years because Benedict was relatively aggressive in booting out extremely bad bishops. Benedict was feared in a healthy way. This guy is basically the big green light to every Marxist-homosexualist to just go ahead and do whatever, because they know Francis will never remove them or even chastise them, because Francis doesn't believe that the pope has any universal authority and is merely the bishop of the city of Rome proper - at least that is the excuse that will be given when nothing is done about abuses and heresies **that Francis is sympathetic towards.**

BUT, like all insecure leaders who say that they reject authority and obedience, reports from Buenos Aires are that he is an iron-fisted totalitarian against traditionalists, precisely because he has no confidence in or respect for his own authority, and thus assumes that no one else does either, and thus wields power against his perceived enemies only from brute force. Again, this is TEXTBOOK 20th century Marxist worldview and psychology. It is also the diametrical opposite of the virtue of MEEKNESS, which is power under control.

Next, he is an "ecu-maniac", which is to say that he is in the "all religions are equal and can't we all just get along" camp. In Buenos Aires he knelt before and received the "blessing" of a Superfun Rockband Church "pastor", and even received "communion" from a Protestant. There are pictures floating around of that episode. This is terrifying. He clearly does not have a strong belief in or understanding of Our Lord, His Church, the Mass or the Real Presence of Our Lord in the Eucharist. But, as I have stated repeatedly, almost none of the men ordained in the 1960s, 70s or 80s do.

Next, he's a Jesuit. Now, I must disclose that I have a deep personal, seething, visceral hatred of Jesuits, but my hatred of them is a corollary to the fact that they long ago descended into truly evil heresies and apostasy. Jesuits, in addition to being a cult of sodomites who hate God, are also … wait for it … Marxists. Now Francis has in the past put up some token resistance to so-called "Liberation theology", which is just Communist Totalitarianism in religious drag, but he is huge, huge, huge on "social justice", which is merely code for Marxism. This guy's worldview revolves around giving people free stuff because it's nice, which as we have discussed is contrary to logic and reason, specifically in the subset of mathematics, and thus is contrary to Our Lord who is FIRST the Logos, with the Divine Caritas (charity) proceeding out of the Logos. Bottom line, there will be zero positive assistance to the world from Francis with regards to the inevitable economic collapse. Not only will there be nothing helpful coming from him, he will almost certainly come out in favor of more debt, more "free stuff", and more rhetoric about how people are "entitled" to physical and service commodities (which are someone else's man-hours, remember) as "rights".

But Ann! He has gone on record against homosexual "marriage" and abortion!

Wow. Is this really how far we have sunk? The Roman pontiff is on record as being against sodomy and killing babies and we cite this as proof of ORTHODOXY? Really? I wonder if he also believes in gravity. Does belief in gravity constitute a conservative worldview now?

Benedict thought that between the "Natural Solution" (the passage of time yielding the death or retirement of the bad guys) and the appointments he was able to make over the last eight years that he had set up the College of Cardinals to elect a successor that was very much in the Ratzingerian camp. Benedict was wrong. Not only did they not elect a Ratzingerian, they elected the anti-Ratzinger. In the 2005 conclave Francis came in second to Ratzinger, which is to say that Francis was the "opposition". In what must have Benedict's mind reeling today, after eight years of purging and priming the College of Cardinals, the very men Ratzinger placed turned around and elected the anti-Ratzinger. This proves, as I have said all along, that playing prevent defense, namely the "natural solution" of waiting for the bad guys to die is UNSOUND. In war, you fix your bayonets, say your prayers, and you charge.

Tridentine Mass-goers and clergy, this guy will be on the warpath against us at some point. Prepare. Brace. He may attempt to undo Summorum Pontificum either directly or through intense passive aggression. Any hopes of reconciling the good guys in the SSPX is now totally over. Beyond that, the splinter factions will now claim that "they were right", and sadly even more schism will result, and more people will remain outside the Church. So sad.

We got what we deserved, and probably better than we deserve. God's chastisement of His people is sending them bad priests, bishops, and now, in all likelihood, a bad pope. What do you expect? Look around. The world is awash in staggering sin and blasphemy and no one will lift a finger to do anything about it. And, as my last essay on penance proved via my email box, no one is sorry or has any desire to make reparation to Our Lord for any of it. No one has the slightest comprehension of the notion of taking on the burden of guilt for sins that they didn't directly commit, which blows my mind because that is LITERALLY the ENTIRE POINT of the Incarnation. The mind reels at the collective obtuseness needed to miss that glaring point.

No one has the slightest comprehension of the idea of seeing Our Lord in agony and simply stepping over to Him and asking, "What can I do to help You? What can I do to make You feel better? Let me take some of Your burden. Let me go with You."

Nope. So long as we all leave Him alone in His Passion, He will leave us to our self-absorption and indifference.

Kyrie eleison. Christe eleison. Kyrie eleison.

Viva il Papa.

---

GJ - Notice how the popes were anti-Socialist before but now are accommodating the Big State philosophy of the end times.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2997331/posts


PIUS IX (1846-1878):
“Overthrow [of] the entire order of human affairs”
“You are aware indeed, that the goal of this most iniquitous plot is to drive people to overthrow the entire order of human affairs and to draw them over to the wicked theories of this Socialism and Communism, by confusing them with perverted teachings.”

LEO XIII (1878-1903):
Hideous monster
“...communism, socialism, nihilism, hideous deformities of the civil society of men and almost its ruin.” (Encyclical Diuturnum, June 29, 1881)

Destructive sect
“...socialists and members of other seditious societies, who labor unceasingly to destroy the State even to its foundations.” (Encyclical Libertas Praestantissimum, June 20, 1888)
Socialists debase the natural union of man and woman and assail the right of property
“They [socialists, communists, or nihilists] debase the natural union of man and woman, which is held sacred even among barbarous peoples; and its bond, by which the family is chiefly held together, they weaken, or even deliver up to lust. Lured, in fine, by the greed of present goods, which is ‘the root of all evils, which some coveting have erred from the faith’ (1 Tim. 6:10.3), they assail the right of property sanctioned by natural law; and by a scheme of horrible wickedness, while they seem desirous of caring for the needs and satisfying the desires of all men, they strive to seize and hold in common whatever has been acquired either by title of lawful inheritance, or by labor of brain and hands, or by thrift in one’s mode of life.” (Encyclical Quod Apostolici Muneris, December 28, 1878, n. 1)

PIUS XII (1939-1958):
The Church will fight to the end, in defense of supreme values threatened by socialism
“[The Church undertook] the protection of the individual and the family against a current threatening to bring about a total socialization which in the end would make the specter of the ‘Leviathan’ become a shocking reality. The Church will fight this battle to the end, for it is a question of supreme values: the dignity of man and the salvation of souls.”

JOHN XXIII (1958-1963):
“No Catholic could subscribe even to moderate socialism”
“Pope Pius XI further emphasized the fundamental opposition between Communism and Christianity, and made it clear that no Catholic could subscribe even to moderate Socialism.”

JOHN PAUL II (1978-2005):
Fundamental error of socialism: A mistaken conception of the person
“Continuing our reflections, ... we have to add that the fundamental error of socialism is anthropological in nature. Socialism considers the individual person simply as an element, a molecule within the social organism, so that the good of the individual is completely subordinated to the functioning of the socio-economic mechanism.

BENEDICT XVI (2005 - present):
“We do not need a State which regulates and controls everything”

CPH and NPH



quercuscontramalum (http://quercuscontramalum.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "More Semi-Plagiarism from Pope Paul the Unlearned":

CPH & NPH should publish Luther's Works online as PDFs so the entire world can examine them. The Church (in Africa in particular) struggles for teachers, yet the publishers hide the Light under their bushels our of monetary fear, not love.

I recall Jesus mentioning something about burying treasure instead of stewarding it. It will certainly cost the respective Synods less money in lost sales doing as I suggest than what they disburse in legal fees, consulting, travel, and clown churches. (Churches get a lot accomplished when sticking to their knitting.)



More Semi-Plagiarism from Pope Paul the Unlearned



Here is the post.

But here is the original review of Bell's new book.

How does an editor at CPH get away with this?

Here is the transitional sentence, enlarged for my readers. I had to look for it -

These remarks are spot on:


This is a continuation of his method of writing one whole paragraph and gliding into someone else's work. The overall impression is one long post of carefully considered ideas. The author and title of the original post are obscured, that is hidden, by embedding the link.

He could embed the link this way, at the beginning of a paragraph.

Trevin Wax, on his blog Gospel Coalition, wrote the following about Bell's book:

One cheap trick like this would be a firing offense for a journalist. The concept is clear - give the impression of writing a long post, but leave a bolt-hole to say to critics - "There is the place where I admitted copying the whole thing."

It makes everyone wonder about the integrity of CPH, since this behavior is rewarded.

---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "More Semi-Plagiarism from Pope Paul the Unlearned":

I see the the first three short paragraphs are by McCain. He says he didn't read Rob Bell's latest book, but then says he found "These remarks are spot on." How can one say that w/o reading or even scanning the book? McCain says he doesn't have to smell each garbage can to know they stink, but with McCain's mega-salary, I'd bet he throws some pretty nice things out. I'd bet that plenty of stuff Paul put out on the curb has been retrieved and ended up selling on ebay.

McCain's real envy has more to do, I think, with the fact that Rob Bell sells his books for $10 to $15 new, and only $8 for the e-versions. Now if McCain could do that with CPH books (and not just during sales), I'd say he's really worth his mega-salary. BTW, Rob Bell's publisher is HarperOne of HarperCollins, and HarperCollins (and Zondervan with its NIV 2011) is owned by Murdoch's NewsCorp.

As the Ichablog post notes, McCain doesn't put the giant quotation in quote marks, and doesn't indent it either. For someone just scanning McCain's blog, one would think he put many hours of work and contemplation into this post, until one read the details.

I think McCain introduces and then glides into other people's work is he doesn't want to give the impression that his blog is more anthology than original thinking, and reproducing so much content (instead of snippets) from other blogs means his blog doesn't become a mere jumping-off spot to other blogs. It's stealing web traffic, really. Why read other blogs when one can just read McCains?

Often McCain doesn't even glide into other people's works, such as when he quotes the Catholic Encyclopedia. Why? Evidently because that source is beyond copyright, so the authors and compilers are dead, and they have no legal standing even if they lived to be 200 years old. So they can't get Paul in hot water for giving the appearance that the work is his all the way until the very end where Paul gives the link to the source. Paul ought to show dead authors the same respect he grudgingly gives to live authors:

==================

http://cyberbrethren.com/2013/03/13/more-baloney-from-bell/

==================

Murdoch's News Corporation (Zondervan with its new NIV is also a subsidiary of NewsCorp)
http://www.linkedin.com/company/harpercollins-publishers

HarperCollins Publishers is one of the world’s leading English-language publishers. Headquartered in New York, the company is a subsidiary of News Corporation.

==================

Rupert Murdoch: Bible mogul | Geez Magazine
www.geezmagazine.org/.../rupert-murdochs-big-bible-busines...

Jul 14, 2011 – But few people know that Murdoch also owns Zondervan, the world's largest publisher of Bibles.

Wait Until He Is Dead To Make Him a Saint.
Noonan on a Gush:
'Go and Repair My House' - WSJ.com.
Like Schroeder and Harris?



'Go and Repair My House' - WSJ.com:


I'll tell you how it looks: like one big unexpected gift for the church and the world.
Everything about Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio's election was a surprise—his age, the name he took, his mien as he was presented to the world. He was plainly dressed, a simple white cassock, no regalia, no finery. He stood there on the balcony like a straight soft pillar and looked out at the crowd. There were no grand gestures, not even, at first, a smile. He looked tentative, even overwhelmed. I thought, as I watched, "My God—he's shy."
Then the telling moment about the prayer. Before he gave a blessing he asked for a blessing: He asked the crowd to pray for him. He bent his head down and the raucous, cheering square suddenly became silent, as everyone prayed. I thought, "My God—he's humble."
I wasn't sure what to make of it and said so to a friend, a member of another faith who wants the best for the church because to him that's like wanting the best for the world. He was already loving what he was seeing. He asked what was giving me pause. I said I don't know, the curia is full of tough fellows, the pope has to be strong.
Columnist Dan Henninger on what can be gleaned from Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio's background about how he might deal with China and Islam. Photo: Getty Images
"That is more than strength," he said of the man on the screen. "This is not cynical humanity. This is showing there is another way to be."
Yes. This is a kind of public leadership we are no longer used to—unassuming, self-effacing. Leaders of the world now are garish and brazen. You can think of half a dozen of their names in less than a minute. They're good at showbiz, they find the light and flash the smile.
But this man wasn't trying to act like anything else.
"He looks like he didn't want to be pope," my friend said. That's exactly what he looked like. He looked like Alec Guinness in the role of a quiet, humble man who late in life becomes pope. I mentioned that to another friend who said, "That would be the story of a hero."
And so, as they're saying in Europe, Francis the Humble. May he be a living antidote.

***

He is orthodox, traditional, his understanding of the faith in line with the teaching of John Paul II and Benedict XVI. He believes in, stands for, speaks for the culture of life.
He loves the poor and not in an abstract way. He gave the cardinal's palace in Buenos Aires to a missionary order with no money. He lives in an apartment, cooks his food, rides the bus. He rejects pomposity. He does not feel superior. He is a fellow soul. He had booked a flight back to Argentina when the conclave ended.

Peggy Noonan's Blog

Daily declarations from the Wall Street Journal columnist.
But these two traits—his embrace of the church's doctrines and his characterological tenderness toward the poor—are very powerful together, and can create a powerful fusion. He could bridge the gap or close some of the distance between social justice Catholics and traditional, doctrinal Catholics. That would be a relief.
And he has suffered. Somehow you knew this as you looked at him Wednesday night. Much on this subject will come out.
The meaning of the name he chose should not be underestimated. Cardinal Bergoglio is a Jesuit and the Jesuits were founded by St. Ignatius Loyola, who said he wanted to be like St. Francis of Assisi.
One of the most famous moments in St. Francis's life is the day he was passing by the church of St. Damiano. It was old and near collapse. From St. Bonaventure's "Life of Francis of Assisi": "Inspired by the Spirit, he went inside to pray. Kneeling before an image of the Crucified, he was filled with great fervor and consolation. . . . While his tear-filled eyes were gazing at the Lord's cross, he heard with his bodily ears a voice coming from the cross, telling him three times: 'Francis, go and repair my house which, as you see, is falling into ruin.'" Francis was amazed "at the sound of this astonishing voice, since he was alone in the church." He set himself to obeying the command.
Go and repair my house, which is falling into ruin. Could the new pope's intentions be any clearer?
The Catholic Church in 2013 is falling into ruin. The church has been damaged by scandal and the scandals arose from arrogance, conceit, clubbiness and an assumption that the special can act in particular ways, that they may make mistakes but it's understandable, and if it causes problems the church will take care of it.
Pope Francis already seems, in small ways rich in symbolism, to be moving the Vatican away from arrogance. His actions in just his first 24 hours are suggestive.
He picks up his own luggage, pays his own hotel bill, shuns security, refuses a limousine, gets on a minibus with the cardinals. That doesn't sound like a prince, or a pope. He goes to visit a church in a modest car in rush-hour traffic. He pointedly refuses to sit on a throne after his election, it is reported, and meets his fellow cardinals standing, on equal footing. The night he was elected, according to New York's Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Vatican officials and staffers came forward to meet the new pope. He politely put them off: Not now, the people are waiting. Then he went to the balcony.
The church's grandeur is beautiful, but Francis seems to be saying he himself won't be grand. This will mean something in that old Vatican. It will mean something to the curia.

***

After the conclave, I'm grateful for two other things. First, after all the strains and scandals they still came running. A pope was being picked. The smoke came out and the crowd was there in St Peter's Square. They stood in the darkness, cold and damp, and they waited and cheered and the square filled up. As the cameras panned the crowd there was joy on their faces, and the joy felt like renewal.
People come for many reasons. To show love and loyalty, to be part of something, to see history. But maybe we don't fully know why they run, or why we turn when the first reports come of white smoke, and put on the TV or the computer. Maybe it comes down to this: "We want God." Which is what millions of people shouted when John Paul II first went home to Poland. This is something in the human heart, and no strains or scandals will prevail against it.
I viewed it all initially with hope, doubt and detachment. And then the white smoke, and the bells, and the people came running, and once again as many times before my eyes filled with tears, and my throat tightened. That in the end is how so many Catholics, whatever their level of engagement with the church, feel. "I was more loyal than I meant to be."
Much will unfold now, much will be seen. An ardent, loving 75-year-old cardinal in the middle of an acute church crisis is not going to sit around and do nothing. He's going to move. "Go and repair my house, which you see is falling into ruin."


'via Blog this'

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Wait Until He Is Dead To Make Him a Saint. Noonan ...":

I highly recommend researching the Roman Catholic Jesuits, the oath that is sworn when becoming a Jesuit, their connection to the United Nations Luciferic world religion - the United Religions Initiative (Thrivent supported and therefore blessed by the Lutheran Synods) and their goals.

***

GJ - The new pope belongs to an order banned and dissolved by an earlier, infallible pope.

Jesuits are highly trained but on the bleeding edge of apostasy, by Roman standards. The word "Jesuit" is synonymous with tricky.

Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg book ‘Lean In’ offers terrible feminist advice for working women - NYPOST.com

The Facebook team and I dropped by
Walmart headquarters for some heavy marketing discussions.
I gave Z-man a personalized t-shirt. Look at his grin.

Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg book ‘Lean In’ offers terrible feminist advice for working women - NYPOST.com:


Sheryl Sandberg is hazardous to women.
The chief operating officer of Facebook, the universe’s top working mom, has reinvented herself as a latter-day guru to the fair sex — the rare lady who strives to give a leg up to the sisterhood.
But those who follow Sheryl’s lead are bound to be disappointed — bitter, broke, unemployed, and perpetually single.
To scads of fawning journalists and admirers, Sheryl, just Sheryl, is a pretty, but not too pretty and not too thin, 43-year-old working mom — just like us!
Sheryl (right) and her two kids live in a California mansion with a husband who does laundry. Her big career atop the giant social-media company made her a billionaire before menopause.

Reuters
Did I mention that she’s filthy, stinking rich?
We are currently witnessing the Sheryl Moment. Her face, always tilted to a 15-degree angle to show she’s listening —or bored silly —is everywhere.
She appeared on “60 Minutes’’ last Sunday, annoying the bejeezus out of lesser females by declaring, in a soft voice, that if you’re not CEO of a Fortune 500 company yet, then it’s your own, damn fault.
The next day, her instant best seller came out, “Lean In: Women, Work and the Will to Lead’’ — which she called a “sort of feminist manifesto.’’ Mayor Bloomberg threw her a sort of book party.
Not unexpectedly, Sheryl was quickly savaged by jealous women who don’t own her pair of Harvard degrees, connections, Louboutins, or permission from their bosses to leave work every day at 5:30 for dinner with the kids.
These women also were not mentored by Sheryl’s economics professor, Larry Summers, who recruited her to the World Bank before age 30. Sheryl then left to become a Google exec.


'via Blog this'

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Churchmouse Campanologist | Ringing the bells for Christian traditions and getting our story out there. If we don’t, who will?

Cue West Side Story music -
"There's a place for us, 
A time and place for us. 
Hold my hand and we're halfway there. 
Hold my hand and I'll take you there 
Somehow, 
Some day, 
Somewhere!"


Churchmouse Campanologist | Ringing the bells for Christian traditions and getting our story out there. If we don’t, who will?:

"Nearly two years ago — March 21, 2011 — The Clergy Project launched.

It is funded by the Stiefel Freethought Foundation (SFF), The Freedom From Religion Foundation and the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. [GJ - Curt Peterson was a Church Growther and pal of David Valleskey. In the LCMS and WELS he promoted CGism. He is now a publishing member of this loud and proud atheistic foundation, but his four essays are still in the Holy of Holies, the WELS Essay Files.]

Priests and ministers who become atheists can turn to the Project as

a safe haven for active and former clergy who do not hold supernatural beliefs,” has already launched scholarships to help non-believing clergy, a new “Employment Transition Program” is launching next month.

The words ‘a safe haven’ are puzzling. True Christians would be only too happy to see such clergy renounce their vocations and quietly leave the pulpit and the Church."

More at this link.

'via Blog this'

Buchholz Update - Building Up the Debt

Perhaps the plan is to earn tax money from the kiddie program,
which is what UOJ Jack Cascione did.


Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Hunnius on the Rite of Exorcism | Faith Alone Just...":

Rydecki, utterly fruitful while bearing the cross of Christ during his defense of Justification solely by Faith Alone and following his excommunication by antiChristian DP Jon Buchholz.

Buchholz - utterly dismal as he manipulated Christ's called minister from his congregation while anathematizing Christ's chief doctrine of Justification solely by faith alone, promoting the Pietistic growth groups within his congregation and plying his trade at shackling his congregation with debt with a building project. (he left Holy Trinity Des Moines Wa. with $1.3M in debt after joining the chorus that they would increase membership by 14% by building a new church). For that he received a new call as Sr. Pastor in Tempe. Kudos.

http://www.elctempe.org/home/180001623/180001623/Images/2013-03%20March.pdf

Now he's promoting a state licensed pre-school, "Deeper Roots, Higher Sights", which will cost $400K with a seed offering of $10K. His Des Moines stunt was called "Let The Children Come" and ironically wound up taking money from the CDS restricted funds to pay the monthly bill on the $1.3M that was still outstanding when he left.

Hunnius on the Rite of Exorcism | Faith Alone Justifies

Hunnius on the Rite of Exorcism | Faith Alone Justifies:


Hunnius on the Rite of Exorcism

ThesesRepealingExorcismThis translation has just been published byRepristination Press.  It’s a topic I had never studied too deeply, but I thoroughly enjoyed translating this work of Aegidius Hunnius and learning from him what the issues were surrounding the Rite of Exorcism in the Lutheran churches at the turn of the 17th Century.  This book has nothing to do with The Exorcist or with physical demon possession and the “rites” that may exist in the Roman Catholic Church to expel such demons.  Instead, it deals with the Rite that was historically attached to a baptismal ceremony in which the pastor would speak to the devil and command him to “Depart!” before the Baptism itself could take place.
I especially appreciate Hunnius’ emphasis on the Sacrament of Holy Baptism as that alone which has the word and promise of God to drive out the devil and rescue a child out of Satan’s kingdom.  I also respect his honesty in highlighting some of the areas in which even honored Church Fathers wandered away from the Word in this regard.


'via Blog this'

Pastor Paul Rydecki - Excellent Hoenecke Sermon on God’s Forgiveness | Faith Alone Justifies



Excellent Hoenecke Sermon on God’s Forgiveness | Faith Alone Justifies:


Excellent Hoenecke Sermon on God’s Forgiveness

This sermon was posted on Intrepid Lutherans today. It is an excellent description of the forgiveness of sins. The typical modern WELS interpretation of Jesus’ words from the cross, “Father, forgive them!”, is that God forgave all sinners their sins, right then and there, whether anyone ever believes in Christ or not. Hoenecke maintains the beautiful evangelical significance of Jesus’ words without falling into this modern error of separating forgiveness from faith in Christ.
Somehow, I suspect that the WELS leadership would still praise Hoenecke for this sermon, even while they would condemn me for preaching the same thing.
_________________________________________________
Weep not for Me, O Daughters of Jerusalem, by Master Thomas de Coloswar (1427)

On Wednesdays through the Lenten Season this year (2013), we will be publishing sermons from Dr. Adolph Hoenecke (1835-1908), who is among the most important theologians of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS), and from Dr. Paul E. Kretzmann (1883-1965), a prolific author, educator, historian and theologian of theLutheran Church — Missouri Synod (LCMS)and among the more significant figures of 20thCentury American Lutheranism.
Last Sunday marked the beginning of the Fourth Week in Lent, also known as Laetare, and today, as we have the last four Wednesdays, we will yet again be hearing from Dr. Adolph Hoenecke.
To what end did Jesus submit Himself to the suffering of the Cross? To atone for the sins of mankind, that all men might have forgiveness. It was precisely this forgiveness for which Christ pleaded while on the Cross – not just for those seeking forgiveness, but even for those without a single care for their standing before God, for those who mocked Him, for those who betrayed Him, for those who delivered Him to be crucified, in short, for all of humanity – that all men might have forgiveness of sins. Indeed, it is to this end for which Christ, in His Office of High Priest, yet intercedes for us. If it is for all men that Christ intercedes, then it is also for each individual sinner, who, apart from God’s forgiveness stands before Him in the guilt of his sins, but upon whom, through faith, is pronounced by God, “Blessed are you whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered.” This is The Fruit of Christ’s Passion. There is no one for whom Christ did not bear the guilt of sin and suffer its penalty, and there is no one to whom forgiveness is not offered in the Gospel. In the following sermon, Dr. Hoenecke explains.


A Sermon for Laetare
The Fruit of Christ’s Passion
by Dr. Adolf Hoenecke1
Text: And Pilate gave sentence that it should be as they required… And as they led him away, they laid hold upon one Simon, a Cyrenian, coming out of the country, and on him they laid the cross, that he might bear it after Jesus. And there followed him a great company of people, and of women, which also bewailed and lamented him. But Jesus turning unto them said, Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me, but weep for yourselves, and for your children. For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck. Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us; and to the hills, Cover us. For if they do these things in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry? And there were also two other, malefactors, led with him to be put to death. And when they were come to the place, which is called Calvary, there they crucified him, and the malefactors, one on the right hand, and the other on the left. Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. (Luke 23:24-34)
For if they do these things in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry?” These were the words our Lord addressed to the daughters of Jerusalem, who lamented Him as He was being led out to Golgotha mid mockery and scorn. The Lord designates Himself as the green tree. He had received that same designation centuries before in prophecy: “I am like a green fir tree. From me is thy fruit found” (Hos. 14:8). The Lord prophesied thus through the mouth of the Prophet Hosea. The same Prophet adds: “Who is wise, and he shall understand these things? Prudent, and he shall know them?” (v. 9). By nature no man is. But all praise be to God! He has bestowed this wisdom and prudence upon us, so that we recognize the fruit which Jesus brought forth when those things were done to Him, the green wood, the holy and righteous One, which should have been done to us, the unholy, unrighteous, godless ones, the dry wood. He suffered in our stead. Then the words came true: “And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots (shall bring forth fruit from his roots)” (Isa. 11:1). In this present Passion devotion, therefore, we shall refresh our souls with:

THE FRUIT OF JESUS’ PASSION
  1. It is a precious fruit.
  2. It is a fruit we all are to enjoy.
I.
The fruit of Jesus’ Passion is precious. – “Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful… For the Lord knoweth the way of the righteous; but the way of the ungodly shall perish” (Ps. 1). – You are well acquainted with these words. They are from the First Psalm. It is a powerful Psalm. It divides all mankind into two groups, the righteous and the ungodly. A beautiful picture of the righteous emerges from the Psalm. They do not walk in evil ways. This does not come from inborn wisdom, nor is it mere outward show – no! it comes from within. This is because they have hearts that fear and love God. They delight in the Law of the Lord. This also explains why they bring forth good fruits. The righteous, moreover, please God; in grace He looks down upon them. And they are trees whose leaf does not wither. They possess the life that does not die in death, but endures for eternity. But the godless are evil with all their hearts. Following the bent of their hearts, they walk the paths of sin, bold and unconcerned, and they ridicule and mock the divine truth and threat. They are barren trees, accursed trees,which are finally rejected in the judgment and find a terrible end. For theirs is eternal damnation.
Pleasant and blessed indeed is the generation of the righteous! But the generation of the godless is utterly repulsive and terrifying! Now give good ear to the voice of divine wisdom: We all would belong to this repulsive generation of godless men, even at this time, just as we belong to it by nature and by birth. We would still have a heart as completely godless as it was at birth. Evil would be the purpose in our hearts. We would mock God and brazenly, nonchalantly despise His truth. We would go on through life living only to sin and the world, and thereby heap up the wrath of God for the day of judgment. We would be damned in the judgment and would be forced to accept hell as our lot. No righteousness before God and not a trace of piety would be found in us. In fact, in the whole wide world there would not be a single God-fearing and righteous man – if, friends in Christ, if there were not available that fruit of Jesus’ Passion which Jesus Himself, while hanging on the cross, called the forgiveness of sins.

The Crucifixion, by Pieter Lastman (1616)

If we have forgiveness of sins, then God no longer imputes our sin to us as making us guilty and subject to punishment; then we are men who no longer have any guilt in God’s eyes – in short, righteous men. Mark, then we are righteous not only in the sense of the world; not righteous as men count righteousness, or in the way in which men, let their fellows pass as righteous. Rather, we are righteous in the sense that God Himself regards us so, and acknowledges us as righteous in His eyes, having a righteousness that is valid before Him, a righteousness with which He finds no fault at all. If we have forgiveness, then we are righteous men who please God; men from whom He no longer can withdraw Himself, nor would, if he could; men whom He does not wish to see separated from Himself. They are men who have peace with God. In blessed communion they live with Him as dear children of the heavenly Father.
They, in turn, can also heartily love Him; they are able to find delight in Him and His commandments. For, since they have forgiveness, they have also received a new spirit, the spirit of sonship, the Holy Spirit who teaches them to cry: Abba, dear Father! Happy, indeed, are these righteous men! Their way is known to God. He Himself has gone before to show them the beautiful way that leads through tribulation into His eternal kingdom, through the cross into Paradise and its joys.
Then precious beyond all reckoning is the fruit of Jesus’ Passion, the forgiveness of sins! Whenever the Scriptures call a man blessed and speak of a state of blessedness, felicitate him on some glorious change that has taken place in him, it is always the forgiveness of sins which is the basis for such a beatitude, such a felicitation. Thus the Prophet Isaiah exults in praise of the exceedingly glorious condition of the Holy City, God’s Zion. He says that it is a secure abode, so that not one of its inhabitants would say in spite of all troubles, burdens, and tribulations: “I am sick.” Then He states the reason for this wonderful condition of the City: “The people that dwell therein shall be forgiven their iniquity” (Isa. 33:24).
Similarly, Zacharias addressed a wonderful song of praise to God at the birth of his son John. He praised the child because he was to go before the face of the Lord with whom redemption was to come. From his lips broke forth the glad cry: “And thou, child, shalt be called the prophet of the Highest: for thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to prepare his ways; to give knowledge of salvation unto his people by the remission of their sins” (Luke 1:76-77). Thus this believer bestowed the highest and most precious praise upon the forgiveness of sins, as he blessed his young child because it was to bring the people to the knowledge of salvation and forgiveness (Luke 1:77).
Paul, too, offered God the highest praises because of His gifts of grace, and he called the Ephesians happy men, because they were blessed with those gifts. Now the core and center of everything that he said is in these words: “In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins” (Eph. 1:7). And to the Colossians he said: “And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses” (Col. 2:13). God has forgiven you your sins.
The Scriptures know of only one class of people to whom you can say in the full sense of the word: Blessed are you! You happy man! They are the ones whose sins have been forgiven. David says, “Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered” (Ps. 32:1). David, indeed, knows of many treasures which God gives, of an abundance of God’s benefits, but when he wants to bestow the highest praises on the good that God does, he says: “Bless the Lord, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits; who forgiveth all thine iniquities” (Ps. 103:2-3).
The Last Judgment, by Hieronymus Bosch (1450–1516)Therefore

Paul also says that David had the same thought as he: only that man is truly happy and worthy to be called blessed whom God forgives his sins, to whom God no longer imputes his sin unto damnation. He says: “Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works. Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin” (Rom. 4:6-8). To sum up: Throughout the Scriptures the “Blessed are they!” is applied only to those who have forgiveness of sins. Where there is forgiveness of sins, there is life and salvation.
But upon all who do not have forgivenessthere is pronounced the “Woe unto you!” Their sins with their guilt continue to rest upon them. Sin remains upon them and continually draws God’s wrath down upon them. Sin remains upon them, with its punishment and damnation imputed to them. In fact, all sinners should and must speak thus: How can we live if we have no forgiveness? Our sin and iniquity lie upon us. Where there is no forgiveness of sins, there is death and damnation. Woe unto you! – in the full sense of those words – is, then, the verdict that descends on all who have no forgiveness of sins.
In the Scriptures these words: Blessed are you! are applied to men in various connections. “Blessed is that man that maketh the Lord his trust” (Ps. 40:4). “Blessed is he that considereth the poor” (Ps. 41:1). “Blessed is the man whom thou chastenest, O Lord” (Ps. 94:12). But in every case such men are meant to whom these words apply above all: “Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven!” Rom. 4:7 Of the man who has forgiveness, the “Blessed are you!” is spoken in its highest and most comprehensive sense.
The “Woe is you!” is likewise pronounced in various connections. “Woe unto him that buildeth his house by uurighteousuess” (Jer. 22:13). “Woe to him that increaseth that which is not his!” (Increaseth his goods with another’s Hab. 2:6). “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil” (Isa. 5:20). And there are various other Woes. But every “Woe unto you!” can turn at once into a “Blessed are you!” as soon as the God-less man finds forgiveness. For Jesus has borne the curse, the “Woe is you!” pronounced on the sins of all men, and thereby He brought it about that there is forgiveness of sins. Now the sinner can have forgiveness. Now all curses can be converted into benedictions of divine love, and every “Woe unto you!” into a “Blessed are you!”
Mark, that comes about in this way and this way only. If we did not have this glorious fruit of Jesus’ Passion, the forgiveness of sins, then no man could hear these words coming from the lips of God: “Blessed are you!” or “My blessing be upon you!” would comfort him in all his sufferings. No, “Blessed are you!” or “Be of good cheer!” would sustain him in death. Only a “Woe, woe unto you!” and nothing but “Woe!” would come to his ears. Therefore we say: What a precious Passionfruit the forgiveness of sins is!
Why have I said so much in praise of it? Dear friends, you know the reason: We do not account it nearly as precious as we ought. Or do we seek with great diligence this precious fruit, gained for us in the battle of many bitter sufferings? Do we not seek many other things much more eagerly? This lukewarmness and this appallingly low estimate of Jesus’ sufferings would be excusable if you were told, as is done from some pulpits: This sweet, precious fruit, this true fruit of life, is not for you all; for some it did not mature on the tree of the cross. But as true as it is that this fruit is indescribably precious, it is just as true that

II.
We all are surely to enjoy it. This was the boon that Jesus as our High Priest won for us in His prayer on the cross, and that He still gains for us in prayer. “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Thus the Lord prayed on the cross in the midst of His sufferings. Great, indeed, were those sufferings. We cannot even measure them. For He was suffering the full penalty for the world’s sin. He was drinking the cup of damnation, the cup of the death which is the wages of sin. He tasted to the fullest extent what it means to bear the curse of sin.
He did not want to see us bear it. Therefore He suffered. Therefore, even in the midst of His sufferings, when He was already tasting them in their infinite bitterness, even then He cried out: “Father, forgive them.” What a love for sinners dwells in Christ! We have eloquent testimony to that in this petition for forgiveness, spoken from the depths of His sufferings. How ardent must be Jesus’ desire that sinners, even the worst of them, find forgiveness, since He is concerned about them in the midst of His own terrible sufferings and seeks to move the heart of His Father to be gracious toward the sinners!
For whom, then, did the Lord plead so fervently, so movingly, that this great, glorious treasure, this sweet, precious fruit of His Passion, might be given them to enjoy? Was it for Peter, who was deeply grieved? Was it perhaps for the weeping women? Was it, by chance, for the faithful who stood under the cross? Was it for John, the favorite disciple? No, dear friends in Christ! He pleaded for an entirely different group of people. Who would imagine it? What man could conceive it, if the blessed Word of Truth, the Gospel, did not go bond for the fact?
It was for the soldiers who had crucified Him, and pierced His hands and feet, and had then raised Him up. Had they perhaps done it with a feeling of pity? No, with unfeeling cruelty, with mockery and scorn. “And the soldiers also mocked him.” (Luke 23:36). These were the men for whom He pleaded most fervently. It was for the redemption and salvation of these men that He felt such concern, men who did not even care about redemption and life, but mocked Him. But not they alone are meant. There was Pilate, too, who had delivered the Lord to the soldiers; there were the Jews, the mob who had shouted: “Crucify, crucify him!” (Luke 23:21). And there were also the elders and scribes, who had goaded and prodded until Jesus was hanging on the cross.
St. Peter's Pentecost Sermon (Acts 3), by Benjamin West (1738-1820)

The proof for that is found in Peter’s address: “(Ye) killed the Prince of Life. Now brethren, I wot that through ignorance ye did it, as did also your rulers” (Acts 3:15-17). Truly, this goes far beyond man’s capacity to think and feel. Happy are we, dear friends, that we sinners were not entrusted to the hands of men, but into the hands of the sympathetic High Priest. He prayed for all, for the evildoers, for His bitter enemies, for the base blasphemers and mockers of His sufferings. Surely, friends in Christ, that gives us courage. Can anyone still think that he is not to receive the sweet, precious fruit of forgiveness as his secure possession? Who would give up hope of gaining it because he is an unusually bad sinner? Oh, fix your eyes on those for whom Jesus prayed – the very worst evildoers!
But, we ask, did Jesus hang on the cross only for these soldiers, for these Jews? He hung there also as your High Priest. You will not doubt that. Then His petition must also embrace you. He prayed on the cross for the evildoers, including you and me and all men. He prayed in true, heartfelt love. And He still prays. Now He prays, sitting at the right hand of the Father. “And if any man sin, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous.” (1 John 2:1). We have an intercessor who pleads earnestly, urgently, fervently for us with the Father. It is Jesus who is righteous, yea, who has paid the debt for us, has borne all sin for us. Therefore He now asks this of God as His holy right: Forgive, for to this end have I borne all suffering.
Is His prayer heard? How can there be any doubt of that! But we have plain evidence of it, to give us great comfort. Once more recall Peter’s sermon: “Repent ye therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out” (Acts 3:19). Behold, this is an answer to the highpriestly prayer on the cross: Forgive, for they know not what they do. Surely, that also implies: Father, help them out of their ignorance so that they learn to know Me. Grant that there be time for Me to have My Gospel preached to them, so that they come to faith and find forgiveness, so that My blood and sufferings may, by all means, avail for them. And this preaching of the Gospel was the sure testimony that His prayer was heard, the sure testimony that these people were actually to find forgiveness. Therefore Peter also says: “Repent ye and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out.” That is God’s will of grace.
Now, you also have this Gospel. Don’t you see that forgiveness is surely meant for you? Why do you hesitate? Simply receive it by faith. Therefore be diligent in hearing the Word of forgiveness. Let this actually come true in you:
Forgiveness then shall be the song
I will employ my whole life long.
 (Tr. a W. H. F.)
May God help us all in that holy resolve.

AMEN.


Endnotes:Glorified in His Passion, by Dr. Adolf Hoenecke
  1. Hoenecke, A. (1957). Glorified in His Passion (W. Franzmann, Trans.) Milwaukee: Northwestern Publishing House. (Original work published in German, 1910.). pp. 57-68.Note: Dr. Adolf Hoenecke (1835-1908) is among the most important theologians of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS). He, along with Johannes Bading (d. 1913), led the WELS out of pietistic indifferentism and unionism into strong confessional Lutheranism, was one of the founders of the the old Synodical Conference, and is credited with being the first German Lutheran to author a complete Lutheran Dogmatics in America – Evangelical Lutheran Dogmatics – recently translated into English and available from Northwestern Publishing House. For more information about Dr. Hoenecke, a fairly detailed biography written by Professor August Pieper in 1935, can be found at the following link: The Significance of Dr. Adolf Hoenecke for the Wisconsin Synod and American Lutheranism

'via Blog this'

***

GJ - Hoenecke was clearly superior to F. Pieper in many ways, but he also suffered from his training at Halle University, the former mother-ship of Pietism, later the font of Biblical rationalism and Universalism.

Hoenecke's mentor Tholuck admitted to being a Universalist. Between the two philosophies was a lack of emphasis upon faith.

This sermon is ambiguous in its emphasis upon the atonement as the righteousness of Christ without the necessary bridge of the Means of Grace. A UOJ Storm-Brownie today could interpret the sermon as implying the universal righteousness of the world, without faith, yea even the salvation of the world (Buchholz' language).

By not being extreme enough, Hoenecke would not please the current WELS apostasy, so the Intrepids perhaps picked this up as a way of watering down the issue. They do not write me so I do not know. I am guessing that Rydecki chose to clone the sermon because it is enough to get Hoenecke tarred and feathered in modern WELS.

I chose to copy it because people need to have material available, beyond a mere link. I do not endorse anything by quoting it (except Luther, the Confessions, and the post-Concord orthodox).

WELS' dogma requires pixelating the Scriptures, pixelating Luther, and pixelating theologians like Hoenecke, to arrive at a jury-rigged monstrosity, a weapon of mass disinterest where everything is adiaphora - except questioning WELS.

The Missouri UOJ side would be more content with this lack of gunghoedness on the universal salvation business, though Cascione and McCain both love the "born forgiven" language of Eduard Preuss, the pioneer of poping. Would that the rest of UOJers would follow soon.

The Martin Luther elements missing are:
1. A stronger emphasis upon the efficacy of the Word, the Holy Spirit working through the Word.
2. A combination of the atonement and faith in the Gospel message of the atonement.
3. The righteousness of faith - believing is forgiveness. Centuries of Pietism and rationalism have made us reliant on doing rather than believing, making the faith at the end of the sermon something we must do. No  - faith is generated by the Gospel - it is the work of God and something we cannot diminish, ignore, or reject.

---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Pastor Paul Rydecki - Excellent Hoenecke Sermon on...":

Yes, I saw some nice spots in the sermon but the latter part was hurried up.

Believing is forgiveness, I wholly agree. God forgives us by granting us faith in and through the Gospel.


LPC