Friday, December 15, 2023

Lutheran Library -

 


The Papacy: Its History, Dogmas, Genius, and Prospects “…combines at once the rare qualities of clear statement, vigorous logic, and eloquent style. Its tone and spirit are worthy of an Evangelical Alliance.” - Baptist Magazine

Contents

  • About the Lutheran Library
  • Other Works by Wylie
  • Dedication
  • Evangelical Alliance
  • Contents

Book 1. History of the Papacy

    1. Origin of the Papacy
    1. Rise and Progress of Ecclesiastical Supremacy
    1. Rise and Progress of the Temporal Sovereignty
    1. Rise and Progress of the temporal Supremacy
    1. Foundation and Extent of the Supremacy
    1. The Canon Law
    1. Church of Rome Neither Has Nor Can Renounce Her Principles on the Supremacy

Book 2. Dogmas of the Papacy

    1. The Popish Theology
    1. Scripture and tradition
    1. Of Reading the Scriptures
    1. Unity of the Church of Rome
    1. Catholicity of the Church of Rome
    1. Apostolicity, or Peter’s Primacy
    1. Infallibility
    1. No Salvation out of the Church of Rome
    1. Original Sin
    1. Of Justification
    1. Of the Sacraments
    1. Baptism and Confirmation
    1. The Eucharist - Transubstantiation - The Mass
    1. Of Penance and Confession
    1. Of Indulgences
    1. Of Purgatory
    1. Of the Worship of Images
    1. Of the Worshipping of Saints
    1. The Worship of the Virgin Mary
    1. Faith Not to be Kept with Heretics

Book 3. Genius and Influence of the Papacy

    1. Genius of the Papacy
    1. Influence of Popery on the Individual Man
    1. Influence of Popery on Government
    1. Influence of Popery on the Moral and Religious Condition of Nations
    1. Influence of Popery on the Intellectual and Political Condition of Nations

Book 4. Present Policy and Prospects of the Papacy

    1. Sham Reform and Real Re-Action
    1. New Catholic League and Threatened Crusade Against Protestantism
    1. General Propagandism
    1. Prospects of the Papacy

Publication Information

  • Lutheran Library edition first published: 2020 updated: 2023
  • CopyrightCC BY 4.0
James Aitken Wylie
(1808-1890)

Scottish historian of religion and Presbyterian minister.

PREVIOUS

Related

An Important Message from Luther the Angel

 


Luther's sermons have been described as obscure, difficult to follow at times. That is one reason I mark Luther sermon passages in bold and blue, because he often says more in one sentence than others do in a lifetime. 

For example, Luther dwells on the Biblical term "angel." This is how we use that term today.

  1. Someone shovels your walk after a big storm. "You are an angel!"
  2. "How was little Cecil today?" The teacher says, "He was an angel today!" - startling the mother.
  3. The youngest children are dressed in white gowns and have little gold halos on their heads, attached or semi-detached, prompting everyone to say "Awww. Look at those angels."

The Biblical term, in Hebrew and Greek, means "messenger." Malachi, the last book in the Old Testament, means "my messenger." Evangel means the "good message" or the Gospel, a word derived from Anglo-Saxon.

The company you keep.



 The company you keep.


Lutherans Have Become the Church of Rome

Luther's point about the Church of Rome follows. The Vatican does not teach the correct doctrine about Jesus Christ, but the accepted dogma of Roman Catholicism. For example, if someone wears the scapular and is chaste, his time in Purgatory, after death, will be reduced to only a few days, quite a discount. 

If people pay attention to the announcements, books, and decrees of the Pope, they will discover that everything from Rome is about the structure and message of Roman Catholicism. That is why Eastern Orthodoxy is still taught by Rome as inferior, tainted, and not quite what it should be.

Are these things - like the scapular and Purgatory - taught in the Scriptures? Never mind. They are taught by His Holiness, his cardinals, archbishops, bishops, priests, and lay leaders. Many loyal members disagree but the dogma remains.

Even now, some Lutherans are gathering and training apart from the crudeness of ELCA, the rudeness of WELS, the undeserved haughtiness of Missouri, and pipsqueaks of the ELS. The percentage left may be tiny, but a sliver of the Gospel is far better than the New Rome of ELCA-LCMS-WELS-ELS.

The Big Shrinking Four are exactly like the Church of Rome, which may explain why so many Lutheran pastors mimic the smells and belles of the Vatican. How else can the effeminate wear $800 gowns? 

The Big Shrinking Four teach their organizations, not Jesus Christ. That is Luther's point about Roman Catholicism. 

Some will say, "ELCA is far beyond the most radical cultures - and proud of it." Any candidate for a church position must subordinate to all the demands of the current dogma, even though those points are contrary to the Scriptures, especially because they are against the Word of God and Jesus as the Word. A candidate who supports the latest from Hollywood will always displace the traditional person, especially when the latest rules are met. 

Do not be fooled. The sycophant's of WELS, LCMS, and ELS will bow to the rainbow coalition when grabbing for Thrivent grants, just as they did for adulterous Schwan gifts.






Do the Waltherian Three - LCMS, WELS, ELS - follow the same roadmap as the Church of Rome? They certainly do, while playing the game of being different from ELCA and each other.

CFW Walther is the foundation for the Waltherian Three is, but in reality, the syphilitic girl-chaser Bishop Martin Stephan is their anchor, their cornerstone, their seldom-named idol. When the Walther circle lost their demanding Pietistic leader, they attached themselves to the Pietistic pastor Martin Stephan, whose congregation came from Pietism - just as he did. When Stephan's adultery with young women became too obvious to ignore, and he was tried in court for it, the Stephanites packed up and left for New Orleans, then St. Louis and Perryville. 

Walther picked a convenient time to form a riot to remove Stephan from the leadership of their cult. Walther organized the riot, allowed only his fans to participate, and stole Stephan's land, gold, books, and personal possessions. 

Walther was a prolific writer, not always a bad trait, and used that to promote the Objective Faithless Justification taught by Stephan. That is what relieved Walther of his burden of Pietistic sin and continues to plague the LCMS, WELS, and ELS. They have no use for Justification by Faith but a great need to teach the entire world is free from sin, absolved, forgiven. Even the monsters in Hell are "guilt-free saints." 

WELS has over 60 curated essays promoting Objective Faithless Justification, which has been called "a diamond" and more. If studies the situation, Missouri and the Little Sect on the Prairie have the same disgust for the Chief Article of Christianity as WELS does. They refute the writings of St. Paul because the Apostle disagrees with the opinions of their shrinking groups.

The issue from the Bible is - "What do the angels, the messengers, teach about Christ?"

This nonsense was repeated by Robert Preus and Paul McCain.
Preus recanted in Justification and Rome, but that is never acknowledged.


Daily Luther Sermon Quote - Advent 3 - "We must accustom ourselves to the Scriptures, in which angel (angelus) really means a messenger; not a bearer of messages or one who carries letters, but one who is sent to solicit orally for the message. Hence in the Scriptures this name is common to all messengers of God in heaven and on earth, be they holy angels in heaven, or the prophets and apostles on earth."

 



Complete Sermon -> Third Sunday in Advent, 

Matthew 11:2-10. John in Prison: or Christ’s Answer to John’s Question; His Praise of John; and the Application of This Gospel


TWO KINDS OF OFFENSES.

36. Here you observe that there are two kinds of offenses, one of doctrine, and the other of life. These two offenses must be carefully considered. The offense of doctrine comes when one believes, teaches or thinks of Christ in a different way than he should, as the Jews here thought of and taught Christ to be different than he really was, expecting him to be a temporal king. Of this offense the Scriptures treat mostly. Christ and Paul always dwell upon it, scarcely mentioning any other. Note well, that Christ and Paul speak of this offense.

37. It is not without reason that men are admonished faithfully to remember this. For under the reign of the pope this offense has been hushed entirely, so that neither monk nor priest knows of any other offense than that caused by open sin and wicked living, which the Scripture does not call an offense; yet they thus construe and twist this word.

On the contrary, all their doings and all their teachings by which they think to benefit the world, they do not consider to be an offense, but a great help; and yet these are dangerous offenses, the like of which never before existed. For they teach the people to believe that the mass is an offering and a good work, that by works men may become pious, may atone for sin and be saved, all of which is nothing else than rejecting Christ and destroying faith.

38. Thus the world today is filled with offenses up to the very heavens, so that it is terrible to think of it. For no one now seeks Christ among the poor, the blind, the dead, etc.; but all expect to enter heaven in a different way, which expectation must surely fail.

39. The offense of life is, when one sees an openly wicked work done by another and teaches it. But it is impossible to avoid this offense, inasmuch as we have to live among the wicked, nor is it so dangerous, since everybody knows that such offense is sinful, and no one is deceived by it, but intentionally follows the known evil. There is neither disguise nor deception. But the offense of doctrine is that there should be the most beautiful religious ceremonies, the noblest works, the most honorable life and that it is impossible for common reason to censure or discern it; only faith knows through the spirit that it is all wrong. Against this offense Christ warns us, saying, “But whoso shall cause one of these little ones that believe on me to stumble, it is profitable for him that a great millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be sunk in the depth of the sea,” Matthew 18:6.

40. Whosoever does not preach Christ, or who preaches him otherwise than as one caring for the blind, the lame, the dead and the poor, like the Gospel teaches; let us flee from him as from the devil himself, because he teaches us how to become unhappy and to stumble in Christ; as it is now done by the pope, the monks and the teachers in their high schools. All their doings are an offense from head to foot, from the skin to the marrow, so that the snow is scarcely anything but water; nor can these things exist without causing great offense, inasmuch as offense is the nature and essence of their doings. Therefore, to undertake to reform the pope, the convents, and the high schools and still maintain them in their essence and character, would be like squeezing water out of snow and still preserving the snow. But what it means to preach Christ among the poor, we shall see at the end of our text.

III. HOW AND WHY CHRIST PRAISES JOHN.

“And as these went their way, Jesus began to say unto the multitudes concerning John, What went ye out in the wilderness to behold? a reed shaken by the wind? But what went ye out to see? a man clothed in soft raiments? Behold, they that wear soft raiment are in kings’ houses. But wherefore went ye out? to see a prophet?

Yea, I say unto you, and much more than a prophet.”

41. Inasmuch as Christ thus lauds John the Baptist, because he is not a reed, nor clothed in soft raiment, and because he is more than a prophet, he gives us to understand by these figurative words, that the people were inclined to look upon John as a reed, as clad in soft raiment, and as a prophet. Therefore we must see what he means by them, and why he ;censures and rejects these opinions of theirs. Enough has been said, that John bore witness of Christ, in order that the people might not take offense at Christ’s humble appearance and manner.

42. Now, as it was of great importance for them to believe John’s witness and acknowledge Christ, he praised John first for his steadfastness, thus rebuking their wavering on account of which they would not believe John’s witness. It is as though he would say: You have heard John’s witness concerning me, but now you do not adhere to it, you take offense at me and your hearts are wavering; you are looking for another, but know not who, nor when and where, and thus your hearts are like a reed shaken by the wind to and fro; you are sure of nothing, and would rather hear something else than the truth about me. Now do you think that John should also turn his witness from me and, as is the lease with your thoughts, turn it to the winds and speak of another whom you would be pleased to hear?

Not so. John does not waver, nor does his witness fluctuate; he does not follow your swaying delusion; but you must stay your wavering by his witness, and thus adhere to me and expect none other.

43. Again, Christ lauds John because of his coarse raiment, as though to say: Perhaps you might believe him when he says that I am he that should come as to my person; but you expect him to speak differently about me, saying something smooth and agreeable, that would be pleasant to hear. It is indeed hard and severe that I come so poor and despised. You desire me to rush forth with pomp and flourish of trumpets. Had John thus spoken of me, then he would not appear so coarse and severe himself. But do not think thus. Whoever desires to preach about me, must not preach different than John is doing. It’s to no purpose, I will assume no other state and manner. Those who teach different than John, are not in the wilderness, but in kings’ houses. They are rich and honored by the people. They are teachers of man-made doctrines, teaching themselves, and not me.

44. Christ lauds John, thirdly, because of the dignity of his office, namely, that he is not only a prophet, but even more than a prophet, as though to say: In your high-soaring fluctuating opinion you take John for a prophet, who speaks of the coming of Christ, just as the other prophets have done, and thus again your thoughts go beyond me to a different time when you expect Christ to come, according to John’s witness, so that you will in no case accept me. But I say to you, your thoughts are wrong. For just as John warns you not to be like a shaken reed, and not to look for any other than myself, nor to expect me in a different state and manner from that in which you see me, he also forbids you to look for another time, because his witness points to this person of mine, to this state and manner, and to this time, and it opposes your fickle ideas in every way and binds you firmly to my person.

45. Now, if you want to do John justice, then you must simply accept his witness and believe, that this is the person, the state and manner and the time that you should accept, and abandon your presumption and your waiting for another person, state and time. For it is decreed that John should be no shaken reed, not a man of soft raiment, and above all, not a prophet pointing to future times, but a messenger of present events. He will not write as did the prophets, but will point out and orally announce him, who has been predicted by the prophets, saying: “This is he, of whom it is written, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, who shall prepare the way before thee.”

46. What else can this mean than that you dare not wait for another, neither for another manner of mine, neither for another time. Here I am present, the one of whom John speaks. For John is not a prophet, but a messenger. And not a messenger that is sent by the master who stays at home, but a messenger that goes before the face of his master and brings the master along with him, so that there is but one time for the messenger and for the master. Now if you do not accept John as such a messenger, but take him for a prophet who only proclaims the coming of the Lord, as the other prophets have done, then you will fail to understand me, the Scriptures, and everything else.

47. Thus we see Christ pleads, mainly for them to take John as a messenger, and not as a prophet. To this end Christ quotes the Scriptures referring to the passage in Malachi 3:1, “Behold, I send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me,” which he does not do in reference to the other points, namely, his person and manner. For to this day it is the delusion of the Jews, that they look for another time; and if they then had believed that the time was at hand and had considered John a messenger and not a prophet, then everything could easily have been adjusted as to the person and manner of Christ, inasmuch as they at last had to accept his person and manner, at least after the expired time. For there should be no other time than the days of John, the messenger and preparer of the way for his Master. But as they do not heed the time, and look for another time, it is scarcely possible to convince them by his person and manner. They remain shaken reeds and soft-raiment-seekers as long as they take John for his prophet, and not for his messenger.

48. We must accustom ourselves to the Scriptures, in which angel (angelus) really means a messenger; not a bearer of messages or one who carries letters, but one who is sent to solicit orally for the message. Hence in the Scriptures this name is common to all messengers of God in heaven and on earth, be they holy angels in heaven, or the prophets and apostles on earth. For thus Malachi speaks of the office of the priest. “For the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth; for he is the messenger (angel) of Jehovah of hosts.” Malachi 2:7. Again: “Then spake Haggai, Jehovah’s messenger (angel) in Jehovah’s message unto the people,” Haggai 1:13. And again: “And it came to pass, when the days were well nigh come that he should be received up, he steadfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem, and sent messengers (angels) before his face,” Luke 9:51.

Thus they are called God’s angels or messengers and solicitors, who proclaim his word. From this is also derived the word gospel, which means good tidings. But the heavenly spirits are called angels chiefly because they are the highest and most exalted messengers of God.