Thursday, November 15, 2007

Slice of Laodicea



Pastor Rick Warren, Saddleback Church.
Like Lawrence Otto Olson, he has earned a D.Min. from Fuller Seminary.


There are many interesting apostasy posts on Slice of Laodicea.

The newest post concerns Rick Warren's Purpose-Driven Saddleback Church. Purpose-Driven was the rage until Church Growth started Becoming Missional. Hillary will appear at Saddleback to discuss AIDS and the church. I would go except that is laundry day for me.

UOJ Short Circuits



Johnny5, Star of the movie Short Circuit:
"More input."


Universal Objective Justification

UOJ is this opinion, expressed in the 1932 LCMS Brief Statement:

Scripture teaches that God has already declared the whole world to be righteous in Christ, Rom. 5:19; 2 Cor. 5:18-21; Rom. 4:25; that therefore not for the sake of their good works, but without the works of the Law, by grace, for Christ's sake, He justifies, accounts as righteous, all those who that is, believe, accept, and rely on, the fact that for Christ's sake their sins are forgiven.

Why the strange words in bold? Walther's Easter absolution sermon became an article of faith, reprinted to support this false doctrine. According to Walther's Easter sermon, God absolved the whole world of sin when Jesus rose from the dead. The ELS loves this sermon and teaches this strange opinion. The ELS is just as fanatical as the Wisconsin sect in promoting UOJ. Missouri has done the same, but tries to hide the UOJ behind justification by faith. The 1987 Theses of Abomination are an example of this verbal trickery.

If the Brief Statement had said, "Christ has already died for the sins of the world," the sentence would have been Biblical and orthodox. Atonement is not justification by faith. Redemption is not justification by faith. Reconciliation is not justification by faith.

The Moravian Pietists began with the Gospel and then addressed the Law. UOJ came from Pietism via Walther and is very similar in expression to Moravian Pietism. Earlier statements reminded me of this. For instance, one pastor said he told people who came to confess their sins, "You were already forgiven, before you came here." Gospel first, Law second = Moravian Pietism. All American Lutherans have been profoundly influenced by Pietism. Notice how this Pietism is conducive to works-righteousness on one hand (orthodoxy proven by synod membership and DNA) and riotous hedonism on the other hand (Don't worry, my beautiful music director, we were already forgiven before we stopped at the Off-Ramp Inn.)

Short circuit 1: What does UOJ do for confession and absolution when everyone is already absolved?

Short circuit 2: If everyone is already forgiven, why would anyone be in Hell? This was Neuhaus' contention - that Hell is empty. Christian News often reprinted the Neuhaus statement, which makes sense given the assertions of UOJ, taught at the seminary they attended at the same time (Concordia, St. Louis). The recent WELS AnswerMan file is labeled: "Forgiven sinners in Hell."

Short cicuit 3: If WELS, Missouri, and the ELS are so far from ELCA, why are they teaching the same thing about salvation? Granted there are variations in how the clergy express themselves, from the Pentecostal to the crypto-Unitarian. Nevertheless, how is it different to have ELCA say everyone is forgiven and to have WELS/LCMS/ELS say God has declared the world righteous?

Chemnitz was wise in saying that we need to set aside all confessions and return to the Scriptures. Of course, Chemnitz was quoting others who recognized the problem of comparing confessions and avoiding the sources. People say, "Return to the sources," but they often mean a pathetic essay printed or posted on the synodical website.

The sources can only be the Scriptures. They are the revelation of God's will. If someone cannot deal with the unified message of God's Word, then all the conference and faculty papers mean nothing. Ultimately, everyone must face these issues and not ask for some authority figure to substitute for the thinking process.

Short circuit 4: If everyone is absolved, believers and unbelievers alike, then why does God's wrath abide on unbelievers?

KJV John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

If UOJ advocates cannot deal with this one verse of Scripture, their entire scheme falls apart. They cannot, so they avoid John 3:36. They cannot explain forgiven sinners roasting merrily in Hell. They cannot describe how someone is justified twice, first objectively, then subjectively.

Lutherans have engaged in idolatry for over 100 years, and that has not helped matters. Once a revered figure has stated a thesis, that proposition is defended as if it is the very Word of God. Could Walther, Pieper, J. P. Meyer, Sig Becker, Valleskey and Kelm all be correct in all their statements? Why does death confer infallibility? The Scriptures are bent and twisted by synod idolators to make certain verses fit synodical theses.

Short circuit 5: Why all the deception? I have found the UOJ Storm Troopers eager to deceive and play tricks to maintain their imagined orthodoxy. They have lied about UOJ being in the Scriptures, the Book of Concord, J. Gerhard, and Calov. I have yet to find a Gerhard citation supporting UOJ. Robert Preus quoted Quensted and Calov to exclude anything other than justification by faith.

Short circuit 6: Look at the bitter fruits of UOJ! The Lutheran Church has declined precipitously since 1932. There are no signs of health at all. Doctrinal indifference and unionism prevail; apostates are rewarded without shame or reluctance. The cited heroes of conservative Lutherans, the very people quoted today with approval, if not awe, are: Waldo Werning, C. Peter Wagner, Donald McGavran, Kent Hunter, Leonard Sweet, and Reggie McNeal.

Questions for the UOJ Fanatics


Not everyone who uses the term UOJ is a UOJ fanatic. The vast majority who use the term are clergy who were trained in this nonsense in seminary. The synods realize that their UOJ system does not bear scrutiny, so they avoid real discussion about this new doctrine. This leaves many clergy suspended in mid-air, somewhere between the teaching of the Bible/Book of Concord and the real UOJ agenda.

For example, I used OJ and SJ in the first edition of Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant. My understanding then was close to Joe Abrahamson's, expressed in the previous post. I learned the OJ/SJ distinction from Pieper, but I associated the terms with the Atonement of Christ (OJ) and justification by faith (SJ). Extensive conversations with Lutheran laity moved me to study the entire UOJ issue and to deal with it in Thy Strong Word.

UOJ is another example of Lutherans abandoning their trust in the efficacy of the Word in the Means of Grace.

Here are my questions for the UOJ fanatics:



  1. Why do you have God declaring the entire world righteous, without faith?
  2. Why bother with evangelism and worship if "everyone is already saved", as WELS proclaimed in its failed evangelism campaign.
  3. If forgiveness equals salvation, why are there "forgiven sinners in Hell" in the Wisconsin sect? FIC AnswerMan.
  4. If Baptist decision theology is wrong, why does the Wisconsin sect insist that people must "accept OJ" to be forgiven?
  5. If Lutherans always taught UOJ, then why is the terminology so new?
  6. If Lutherans always taught UOJ, why is it missing from the Book of Concord?
  7. If Lutherans always taught UOJ, why are Luther, Melanchthon, Chemnitz, J. Gerhard, and others silent on this blessed insight?
  8. If Missouri always taught UOJ, why did they fail to teach it until the Brief Statement of 1932?
  9. If Lutherans call separating the Holy Spirit from the Word of God Enthusiasm, why do UOJ fanatics embrace Enthusiasm with their strange opinions?
  10. Why are Church Growth gurus like Bivens and Valleskey so keen on UOJ?
  11. Why do the UOJ Stormtroopers deceive people about the novelty, confusion, and Enthusiasm of their position?

Robert Preus, Again - Extensive Comment



Word and Sacrament, by Norma Boeckler

Joe Abrahamson has left a new comment on your post "Robert Preus, Again":

[GJ - I will answer each question separately, within brackets.]

Dear Pr. Jackson,

I'm trying to understand your own understanding of UOJ. Do you make a distinction between the sinners whose debt Christ paid, on the one hand, and the sinners that are forgiven through faith, on the other hand?

[GJ - We are all sinners. Justification by faith means that those who believe in Christ are declared righteous. There is no statement of "God declaring the world righteous" in the Scriptures, the Book of Concord, or the major Lutheran theologians.]

My own understanding is that UOJ is the debt Christ paid and Subjective Justification is a term used to distinguish those who benefit only through faith in Christ's vicarious atonement through the Means of Grace alone.

[GJ - UOJ is so fatuous that people are allowed to believe it is a synonym for the Atonement. Your sentence immediately above does that. I thought so too when I first read Pieper. A system of dual justification, UOJ and SJ, did not exist until the late 19th and early 20th centuries.]

Is it true that "God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them, and has committed to us the word of reconciliation. (II Cor. 5:19) My understanding of "world" is everyone. that is, Christ paid the debt of every sinner.

[GJ - One should not confuse reconciliation with justification. Justification by faith is the only justification in the Word of God. The UOJ system means that everyone is forgiven twice.]

Is it true that "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) My understanding of "world" is the same as just stated.

[GJ - John 3:16 says that God loved the world, not that He declared the world righteous. This is another clear passage about justification by faith being founded upon the universal Atonement of Christ. The Promises of God create faith in the listener. The believer receives and enjoys what the Gospel offers. Thus the invisible Word and the visible Word are called the Means of Grace. Grace without means = Enthusiasm.]

Is it true that "But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption as sons." (Galatians 4:4-5) My understanding of "those who were under the law" is all of sinful mankind, just as Paul writes "Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God." (Romans 3:19) By this I understand in context that the whole world is guilty under the Law, because even if they didn't have the written Law of God they still had their imperfect conscience, which bears witness against them. Therefore all are under the Law of God, and because in Galatians he states "those who were under the law" therefore all are paid for, "redeemed." That is not to say that all benefit. It is just to say that Christ's sacrifice was sufficient for every sinner who has lived or ever would live. The benefit is only through faith, which has been historically described under the locus of Subjective Justification or Personal Justification.

[GJ - Redemption is not justification. Redemption is one English word for two Greek verbs. One Greek verb means release. The other means paying the price. In both cases redemption is a synonym for Atonement.]

Is what Luther wrote on the 5th petition in his Larger Catechism true? "88] Therefore there is here again great need to call upon God and to pray: Dear Father, forgive us our trespasses. Not as though He did not forgive sin without and even before our prayer (for He has given us the Gospel, in which is pure forgiveness before we prayed or ever thought about it). But this is to the intent that we may recognize and accept such forgiveness." My understanding of this is that "without and before our prayer" means that the price of forgiveness has been paid whether or not a person benefits from it (my understanding of Objective Justification), and that praying the Lord's prayer is a confession of faith in that forgiveness (Subjective Justification). Though the Lord's Prayer may be uttered by a hypocrite, it does not invalidate neither the sufficiency of Christ's sacrifice nor the promise of forgiveness available to the unrepentant.

[GJ - The above example is typical in confusing Atonement with justification by faith. It is important to emphasize the efficacy of the Atonement apart from works or merit, which is what Luther taught in the example above. Even the most ardent UOJ advocates have to admit that there is no UOJ in the Book of Concord. Yes, this passage is used from time to time, but the attempt to retrofit UOJ into the Book of Concord fails.]

Christ gives an example of Himself when he says "But if you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? For even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who do good to you, what credit is that to you? For even sinners do the same. And if you lend to those from whom you hope to receive back, what credit is that to you? For even sinners lend to sinners to receive as much back. But love your enemies, do good, and lend, hoping for nothing in return; and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High. For He is kind to the unthankful and evil. Therefore be merciful, just as your Father also is merciful." (Luke 6:32-36) Christ's explicit implication is that he paid for all, even those who would not believe and rejected him. Salvation is not "in view of faith." Because faith does not originate with sinful mankind. But the clear implication of Christ's words is that He did pay for every sinner, even if they would not benefit through faith.

[GJ - Once again Atonement is confused with justification by faith. Christ paid for the sins of the world when He died on the cross. The Gospel justifies those who believe and moves people to glorify God through good works. The statement about "in view of faith" does not make sense to me. I know UOJ advocates have used that episode and Limited Atonement from Calvinism to support their arguments, but the effort is futile. Faith comes from the preached Word, which is effective both in converting and damning. Those who reject the Gospel harden their hearts against the Word of God.]

Furthermore, Paul writes "For when we were still without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. For scarcely for a righteous man will one die; yet perhaps for a good man someone would even dare to die. But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from wrath through Him. For if when we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved by His life." (Romans 5:6-10) Is it true, then, as Paul writes, that our sins were paid for before we were brought to faith through the word and sacrament? Paul distinguishes between the payment for all sin (termed UOJ by some theologians) and what is called Subjective Justification in the same Lutheran theologians, that is, salvation through faith alone.

[GJ - Romans 5 is central to the issue of justification. The entire passage should be quoted, starting with "Therefore, since we are justified by faith..." I do not find Paul stating anywhere, "Therefore, since we are justified without faith, without the Word, without the Means of grace..." The section of Romans 5 selected above is a clear statement of the universal Atonement. What better way to create faith than to remove any notion of merit?]

I know that Luther was a sinful human capable of error, but in trying to clearly understand what you are teaching regarding UOJ what do you think of the following quote from Luther: "Christ did indeed suffer for the whole world; but how may are there who believe and cherish this fact? Therefore, although the work of redemption itself has been accomplished, it still cannot help and benefit a man unless he believes it and experiences its saving power in his heart (Plass #2203)

What I understand as UOJ is what Luther describes as "Christ did indeed suffer for the whole world." What I understand as Subjective Justification is, in Luther's words "it still cannot help and benefit a man unless he believes it and experiences its saving power in his heart."

[GJ - Lutherans would be better off if they dropped the SJ/UOJ business. The two paragraphs above are consistent with the Book of Concord and the Scriptures, except there is no declaration of the world being righteous (Brief Statement). Therefore, UOJ is a fantasy from the Pietism of Walther.]

I believe that you are rightly reacting to an abuse of the doctrine of UOJ. And that abuse of this doctrine can mislead people into carnal security. But so far, what I have seen of your writings does not object to the Bible's teaching that Christ has paid for all sin and every sin.

[GJ - My objections are to the false doctrine of UOJ. The effects of UOJ are obvious in the ELS, WELS, LCMS, and ELCA.]

I sincerely want to understand you correctly and to avoid logomachy.

And I want you to know that you and your family are continually in my prayers. Thank you for your work.

[GJ - Thank you. All the materials are posted or linked on this blog. The biggest concentration is in the justification chapter of Thy Strong Word.]

Sincerely,

Joe Abrahamson (Marty's classmate)

[GJ - I remember. God's blessings to you as you continue to study the Word and the Confessions.]

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Robert Preus, Again




From Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant:

However, Preus clarified the true meaning of justification in his final book, Justification and Rome, which was published posthumously. Preus wrote this definitive comment:

But the imputation of Christ's righteousness to the sinner takes place when the Holy Spirit brings him to faith through Baptism and the Word of the Gospel. Our sins were imputed to Christ at His suffering and death, imputed objectively after He, by His active and passive obedience, fulfilled and procured all righteousness for us. But the imputation of His righteousness to us takes place when we are brought to faith.

Preus immediately followed the statement above with a quotation from Quenstedt, one of his favorite orthodox Lutheran authors:

It is not just the same thing to say, “Christ’s righteousness is imputed to us” and to say “Christ is our righteousness.” For the imputation did not take place when Christ became our righteousness. The righteousness of Christ is the effect of His office. The imputation is the application of the effect of His office. The one, however, does not do away with the other. Christ is our righteousness effectively when He justifies us. His righteousness is ours objectively because our faith rests in Him. His righteousness is ours formally in that His righteousness is imputed to us.

Preus also quoted Abraham Calov with approval:

Although Christ has acquired for us the remission of sins, justification, and sonship, God just the same does not justify us prior to our faith. Nor do we become God's children in Christ in such a way that justification in the mind of God takes place before we believe.

Justification by faith, in the original sense, was taught in the official catechism of the Missouri Synod, and then was gradually changed:

#305 Why do you say in this article: I believe in the Forgiveness of Sins? Because I hold with certainty that by my own powers or through my own works I cannot be justified before God, but that the forgiveness of sins is given me out of grace through faith in Jesus Christ. For where there is forgiveness of sins, there is also true justification. Psalm 130:3-4; Psalm 143:2; Isaiah 64:6; Job 25:4-6 (Q. 124).

***

GJ - I prefer Preus' final work to the WELS AnswerMan.

WELS UOJ - Refuted by Luther



C. Peter Wagner, Pentecostal Baptist, Fuller Seminary Professor. Once you grasp UOJ, you will be a Pete Wagner fan, too!


WELS AnswerMan

The file on the WELS website for this Q and A was titled: Forgiven Sinners in Hell!

Q. Hi, I have a question regarding a recent question and answer regarding limited atonement. WELS states that even a person that has died and in hell had his sins atoned and had his sins forgiven. Atonement, no problem, but I really disagree that a person in hell had his sins forgiven. How can a forgiven sinner possibly be in hell when there is no forgiveness without repentance? It absolutely makes no sense. Please comment, Thank you

-----------------------------------------

A: The statement you are criticizing is what the Bible says. These are not statements that WELS has come up with. In 2 Corinthians 5:19 the Bible says God has reconciled the world to himself by not counting their sins against them. Not charging sins is the same as forgiving them. The Bible says Christ is the Savior of all men, especially of those who believe (1 Timothy 4:10). It is not WELS but the Bible that says that God has declared the sins of everyone forgiven in Christ.

What you are saying in your comment is that what Scripture says makes no sense to you. However, there really is no problem here. It's just that you are not letting everything that Scripture says stand together. Scripture says that God has declared the sins of the whole world forgiven and that Christ is the Savior of everyone. It also says that that to benefit from this declaration one has to accept it in faith. We let both of these statement stand together. Luther did also. It was Luther who said

Even he who does not believe that he is free and his sins forgiven shall also learn, in due time, how assuredly his sins were forgiven, even though he did not believe it ... He who does not accept what the keys give receives, of course, nothing. But that is not the key’s fault. Many do not believe the gospel, but this does not mean that the gospel is not true or effective. A king gives you a castle. If you do not accept it, then it is not the king’s fault, nor is he guilty of a lie. But you have deceived yourself and the fault is yours. The king certainly gave it. (LW 40, 366f)

WELS has simply echoed this.

***

GJ - Note this statement, which is perilously close to Baptist decision theology and certainly is not Lutheran Means of Grace theology:

It also says that that to benefit from this declaration one has to accept it in faith.

I must not have the newest feminist NIV, because my Bible does not say there are guilt-free saints in Hell. Let me Wawautosi a little and quote the Word of God rather than a random volume of Luther and dog notes from J. P. Meyer (yellowed and cracked with age).

KJV John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

KJV John 16:8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: 9 Of sin, because they believe not on me;

KJV Romans 4:23 Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; 24 But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead; 25 Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.

KJV Ephesians 5:6 Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.

WELS declared in an evangelism campaign: "I am saved, just like you." Enthusiasm is defined as abandoning the Means of Grace, separating the work of God the Holy Spirit from His appointed instruments, the Word and Sacraments. As Luther pointed out, foul errors will follow any form of Enthusiasm. In the Wisconsin sect, Universalism is being taught in the guise of UOJ and Luther!

Luther is just a rabbit's foot for the former members of the Synodical conference. No leader takes Luther's doctrine seriously today.

***

A reader sent me material from Luther's Works, vol. 40. The context is the Office of the Keys. Note this significant section:

Even he who does not believe that he is free and his sins forgiven shall also learn, in due time, how assuredly his sins were forgiven, even though he did not believe it. St. Paul says in Rom. 3[:3]: “Their faithlessness nullify the faithfulness of God.” We are not talking here either about people’s belief or disbelief regarding the efficacy of the keys. We realize that few believe. We are speaking of what the keys accomplish and give. He who does not accept what the keys give receives, of course, nothing. But this is not the key’s fault. Many do not believe the gospel, but this does not mean that the gospel is not true or effective. A king gives you a castle. If you do not accept it, then it is not the king’s fault, nor is he guilty of a lie. But you have deceived yourself and the fault is yours. The king certainly gave it.


Luther, M. (1999, c1958). Vol. 40: Luther's works, vol. 40 : Church and Ministry II (J. J. Pelikan, H. C. Oswald & H. T. Lehmann, Ed.). Luther's Works. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

Was Luther a UOJ Fanatic?


Anonymous: This isn't related to the above post, but I wanted to ask you something.

Here's what Martin Luther wrote:

"Even he who does not believe that he is free and his sins forgiven shall also learn, in due time, how assuredly his sins were forgiven, even though he did not believe it" (LW 40, 366f)

Was Luther a "UOJ fanatic" and heretic like the LCMS and WELS are? Or do you want to rethink your condemnation of UOJ?

***

GJ - I have answered this around 20 times already.
1. I do not have that volume, so I cannot check the context of the quotation.
2. All the efforts to find a UOJ citation in the Book of Concord have failed miserably. The Concordists, in harmony with Luther, did not teach forgiveness without faith, without the Word, apart from the Means of Grace.
3. We do not subscribe to all of Luther's works, whether the American edition or the Weimar or the Lenker sermon set. The Anonymous argument would support praying to Mary, which Luther offered in his Magnificat commentary.
4. There are several quotations of Luther where he spoke of being "already forgiven" as an expression of the universal Atonement. This is the treasure which lies in one heap until it is distributed by the Holy Spirit through the Means of Grace. The repeated asking of this UOJ question is a sign of Lutherans being illiterate in doctrine, especially Luther's doctrine.
5. The centerpiece for UOJ is the Brief Statement of the LCMS. People often admit that the Missouri Synod went downhill from that time on. Cause and effect? I think so. UOJ paved the way for Gospel reductionism, the Bible being a man-made book, and the various forms of Pentecostalism and Church Growthism rampant today. There are many fine pastors and congregations in the LCMS, WELS, and ELS today, but their synods are overcome by Enthusiasm and papism.

Comfort of This Victory in Christ




"We have the comfort of this victory of Christ--that He maintains His Church against the wrath and power of the devil; but in the meantime we must endure such stabs and cruel wounds from the devil as are necessarily painful to our flesh and blood. The hardest part is that we must see and suffer all these things from those who call themselves the people of God and the Christian Church. We must learn to accept these things calmly, for neither Christ nor the saints have fared better."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 263. Sunday after Ascension, Exaudi. John 15:26-16:4.

J. M. Reu Predicted the Lutheran Rot of Today




Trinity Lutheran Seminary (ELCA) was formerly known as Capital Seminary. Lenski taught there and even has a little room named after him. Lenski's daughter Lois became famous for children's stories. My wife was a Lois Lenski fan long before I was a Professor Lenski admirer. She insisted that Roald Dahl married Lois, but he married actress Patricia O'Neal. Therefore, I erred in my human nature when I delved into Lois' biography without checking. (A. Nony Mouse is overly concerned about Lois' actual marriage partner, I think. See his sourpuss comment, true to form.)

Reu's lectures were published by the old ALC in Columbus. They published the Lenski New Testament commentaries, which are still unequaled.

"We find this attitude of tolerance quite frequently among unionists. It is often used to assuage a troubled conscience, one's own as well as that of others; for the unionist declares that every one may continue to hold his own private convictions and merely needs to respect and tolerate those of another. This attitude is totally wrong, for it disregards two important factors: (a) in tolerating divergent doctrines one either denies the perspicuity and clarity of the Scriptures, or one grants to error the right to exist alongside of truth, or one evidences indifference over against Biblical truth by surrendering its absolute validity;and (b) in allowing two opposite views concerning one doctrine to exist side by side, one has entered upon an inclined plane which of necessity leads ever further into complete doctrinal indifference, as may plainly be seen from the most calamitous case on record, viz., the Prussian Union."
J. M. Reu, In the Interest of Lutheran Unity, Columbus: The Lutheran Book Concern, 1940, p. 20.

"Doctrinal indifference is at once the root of unionism and its fruit. Whoever accepts, in theory as well as in practice, the absolute authority of the Scriptures and their unambiguousness with reference to all fundamental doctrines, must be opposed to every form of unionism."
J. M. Reu, In the Interest of Lutheran Unity, Columbus: The Lutheran Book Concern, 1940, p. 20.

Here is a link about Reu.

False Teachers' Perspective




"They [the false teachers] fared like a man who looks through a colored glass. Put before such a man whatever color you please, he sees no other color than that of the glass. The fault is not that the right color is not put before him but that his glass is colored differently, as the word of Isaiah 6:9 puts it: You will see, he says, and yet you will not see it."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols.,
ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 644. Isaiah 6:9.

Sommer Could Not Get a Job in the Conservative Lutheran Synods Today



Founded upon the Rock, God's Word, by Norma Boeckler


"Is it possible that one who has such models as Luther, Walther, Stoeckhardt, Lochner, Sieck, C. C. Schmidt, and Wessel, etc., etc., should leave these rich pastures to feed upon such garbage heaps as those from whom I have quoted?"
Martin S. Sommer, Concordia Pulpit for 1932, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1931, p. viii.

GJ - Chill, Martin. We are supposed to spoil the Egyptians, gathering rich treasures of wisdom from Fuller Seminary, Willow Creek, and the Rosicrucians.

"It is the purpose of this volume to aid in displacing books of Reformed preachers. We would encourage the cultivation of distinctly Lutheran preaching. Therefore, we now appeal to our brethren always to consult Luther when preparing to preach. Quo propior Luthero, eo melior theologus! [The closer to Luther, the better the theologian.] Let us who are called Lutheran preachers be sure that in every one of our sermons we preach God's Word and Luther's doctrine pure. It is that preaching which God demands of us, 1 Peter 4:11. It was that preaching which conquered the Roman Goliath, Revelation 12:11. By that preaching we shall truly build the walls of Zion, not with hay, straw, and stubble, but with such stones as all the powers of hell shall never overthrow, Luke 21:15."
Martin S. Sommer, Concordia Pulpit for 1932, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1931, p. ix.

GJ - No, the closer to Pasadena, the more prosperous the career. Ask Kelm, Valleskey, Hunter, Werning, Olson, Huebner, Luecke, and Bivens.

***

"Dr. Luther, who understood the true intention of the Augsburg Confession better than any one else, remained by it steadfastly and defended it constantly until he died. Shortly before his death, in his last confession, he repeated his faith in this article with great fervor and wrote as follows: 'I reckon them all as belonging together (that is, as Sacramentarians and enthusiasts), for that is what they are who will not believe that the Lord's bread in the Supper is his true, natural body, which the godless or Judas receive orally as well as St Peter and all the saints. Whoever, I say, will not believe this, will please let me alone and expect no fellowship from me. This is final." [WA 54:155, 156]
Formula of Concord, Epitome, Article VII, Lord's Supper, 33, The Book of Concord, ed. Theodore G. Tappert, Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1959, p. 575.

GJ - Luther could have been very influential in the WELS, LCMS, and ELS today if he had been more flexible about doctrine. They ignore him today because of his unbending attitude.

Monday, November 12, 2007

Three Stages of the Church Growth Movement



Krauth


"When error is admitted into the Church, it will be found that the stages of its progress are always three. It begins by asking toleration. Its friends say to the majority: You need not be afraid of us; we are few, and weak; only let us alone; we shall not disturb the faith of others...Indulged in this for a time, error goes on to assert equal rights. Truth and error are two balancing forces...From this point error soon goes on to its natural end, which is to assert supremacy."

Charles P. Krauth, The Conservative Reformation and Its Theology, Philadelphia: The United Lutheran Publication House, 1871, p. 195f.

**

Stage 1 - A few useful ideas. Peter Wagner is a heretic, but you will be one of his fans, too.

Stage 2 - Opponents of Church Growth are legalistic.

Stage 3 - Church and Change Conference banned in 2005, promoted from the WELS website in 2007.

Value of Polemics



Jack Preus, Former LCMS President

The unionists and apostates cannot tolerate polemics, which raise the issues they want to avoid.

The word polemic comes from the Greek word for war. Robert and Jack Preus wrote polemics about the state of the Synodical Conference. Their work forced Lutherans to face some of the issues of the day. Special congregational meetings filled with people who wanted to hear about the issues. The Missouri Synod improved and revived from facing and studying the doctrinal issues.

The General Synod in the 19th century went through a similar battle. The liberals (then as now) hated Lutheran doctrine. The tipping point was reached when a new, unionistic synod was formed within the General Synod. The General Council erupted from the General Synod, roughly a 50-50 split. By 1917 the General Council had won over the liberals and they united again as the United Lutheran Church in America. Big mistake. The apostates quickly took over again.

The apostates are not tolerant. They are not loving. They are not forgiving. Read their favorite authors, the ones they quote so often and so lovingly. That is where their treasure is. They work tirelessly to drive away all opposition. For example, WELS drove three good pastors in Toledo out of the ministry. All three dared to oppose some doctrinal aspect of the Church Growth Movement, which is now Becoming Missional among the Leonard Sweet-hearts.

***

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Value of Polemics":

"Three good pastors"? I suppose one of them was you?

GJ - No, but thank you for making my point.

***

"Therefore, do not speak to me of love or friendship when anything is to be detracted from the Word or the faith; for we are told that not love but the Word brings eternal life, God's grace, and all heavenly treasures."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, III, p. 1411. Ephesians 6:10-17.

"Therefore nothing but a satanic, seductive, and sinister strategy is involved when we are called upon to yield a bit and to connive at an error for the sake of unity. In this way the devil is trying cunningly to lead us away from the Word. For if we adopt this course and get together in this matter, he has already gained ground; and if we were to yield him a fingerbreadth, he would soon have an ell."
What Luther Says, An Anthology
, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, III, p. 1411f. Ephesians 6:10-17.

"However, if anything is undertaken against the Word, faith, and the honor of God, we are in no wise to preserve silence, are to bear it far less patiently. Then we should offer stubborn resistance."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, III, p. 1308. Sermon, 1523.

Luther to George Major...
And to Conservative Lutheran Wafflers Everywhere



George Major


Martin Luther to George Major:

Luther to George Major:

"It is by your silence and cloaking that you cast suspicion upon yourself. If you believe as you declare in my presence, then speak so also to the church, in public lectures, in sermons, and in private conversations, and strengthen your brethren, and lead the erring back to the right path, and contradict the contumacious spirits; otherwise your confession is sham pure and simple, and worth nothing. Whoever really regards his doctrine, faith, and confession as true, right, and certain cannot remain in the same stall with such as teach, or adhere to, false doctrine; nor can he keep on giving friendly words to Satan and his minions. A teacher who remains silent when errors are taught, and nevertheless pretends to be a true teacher, is worse than an open fanatic and by his hypocrisy does greater damage than a heretic. Nor can he be trusted. He is a wolf and a fox, a hireling and a servant of his belly, and ready to despise and to sacrifice doctrine, Word, faith, Sacrament, churches, and schools. He is either a secret bedfellow of the enemies or a skeptic and a weathervane, waiting to see whether Christ or the devil will prove victorious; or he has no convictions of his own whatever, and is not worthy to be called a pupil, let alone a teacher; nor does he want to offend anybody, or say a word in favor of Christ, or hurt the devil and the world."
Martin Luther, quoted in Bente's Historical Introduction, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 94.

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Veterans' Day




The Armistice of November 11, 1918 set the stage for World War II. Now we honor all veterans on this day, as we should.

I read military history throughout the year. Currently I am going through a book on the most significant (not always the most famous) battles in world history.

Many battles and campaigns centuries ago set the stage for events of today. When I read Gibbons' Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire or Norwich's Byzantium, the conflicts of today are previewed. Americans are called "Crusaders" from the First Crusade in 1095 AD! Muslims forget that they took Jerusalem and the Holy Land from the Christian Byzantine Empire. Muslim ships captured and enslaved pilgrims on the way to the Holy Land.

Our military men and women are the finest in the world. Many have sacrificed their lives or their health for the cause of freedom. We should be thankful to them today and every day for their leadership.

Someone asked me yesterday, "Have you seen the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier." I said, "I saw it as a child. Then we took our son to see it. Then we took our son's family there as well."

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Care?-------Us?



Front View

Charis Institute

At a special meeting on August 29, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Center for the Humanities, Arts, and Religion in Society (CHARIS) voted unanimously to continue the suspension of CHARIS' operations. This decision was made because the members of the Board were unable to agree upon CHARIS'' activities during the next year.
Dr. Mark Braun
Chairman, CHARIS Board of Directors


On the same page is this triumphalist link to the Church and Change Conference.

Brethren and sistern, GA is alive and kicking in WELS. Deny the obvious and rub the obvious in the face of the opponents. How dare anyone criticize Charis! We suspended all activities and got everyone saying so. And then we launched our new project from the official WELS.net website.

O God, how sin's dread works abound!
Throughout the earth no rest is found,
And falsehood's spirit wide has spread,
And error boldly rears its head.

The haughty spirits, Lord, restrain
Who over Thy Church with might would reign
And always set forth something new,
Devised to change Thy doctrine true.


Selnecker, Concordist

Inhibited Bishop - Uninhibited Doctrine



Episcopal Bishop Bennison Ousted by Presiding Bishop


PENNSYLVANIA: Bennison will go to trial. Bishop spun lies about health of Diocese

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
11/8/2007


Bishop Charles E. Bennison, the inhibited Bishop of Pennsylvania, has chosen to go to trial on charges that he failed to report the sexual abuse of a minor by his brother John Bennison.

VirtueOnline learned that last Friday, a day before the Diocesan Convention, Bennison traveled to the church's national headquarters at 815 2nd Ave., in New York where he met with F. Clayton Matthews, bishop for pastoral development in the Episcopal Church and Mrs. Katharine Jefferts Schori's consigliere, where he was offered an opportunity to resign as the Bishop of Pennsylvania. Bennison turned down the offer.

Bennison then returned to his office and called together a meeting of the staff. He again proclaimed his innocence and said he would fight the charges.

Following his inhibition at midnight Saturday, Bennison was officially out of the diocese. On Monday morning when the Rev. Glenn Matis, head of the Standing Committee, showed up early at diocesan headquarters to take over the day to day operations. The staff showed up later.

James A. A. Pabarue, Bennison's attorney in this matter, did not return phone calls nor did he respond to an e-mail VirtueOnline sent him requesting more information.

The Rev. Timothy Stafford, rector of Christ Church in Philadelphia, the parish Bennison's wife attends, wrote a private note to his parish which VOL obtained. It says, "I met with Charles last Thursday, and he made it clear to me his intention to proceed with the ecclesiastical trial. I offered to him the advice that he has given me on numerous occasions: 'Make all your decisions as if your successor will have to live with the consequences.' I believe that drawing out this prolonged conflict is not in the interest of our common future of our diocese. I feel that Charles, even if vindicated at trial, would never regain the trust necessary to serve this diocese as Bishop. I pray that Charles chooses what is best for both the diocese and his family."

The Standing Committee of the diocese still has their Presentment charges in place and has not withdrawn them despite the current inhibition of Bennison. Matis, said in a statement, "These allegations were not made by the Standing Committee, but having read the Presentment document carefully and discussed it with Counsel, we felt it incumbent on us to allow the process to go forward as requested by the Presiding Bishop's office.

"We believe that the allegations in the Presentment against Bishop Bennison are profoundly serious and we respect and rely on the work of the Review Committee of The Episcopal Church to have properly and thoroughly investigated these allegations," The Standing Committee has been at odds with the bishop for more than two years over concerns about how he has managed the diocese's assets. More than once in the past, the Standing Committee has called for his resignation or retirement.

Bennison also faces a number of charges in civil court brought by Fr. David. L. Moyer, the Anglo-Catholic priest of the Church of the Good Shepherd, Rosemont. If Bennison is found guilty, the bishop could have several millions of dollars to pay.

The standing committee members should consider the possibility that the diocese may be liable for any judgment that is entered. It is also possible they could become co-defendants since they now are the ecclesiastical authority.

In a letter to the diocese, Mrs. Jefferts Schori says that she talked to Bennison and also revealed Frank Griswold's role in the Presentment charges. She went ahead with the Presentment following a public forum held in the fall of 2006, led by then-Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold who passed on information about Bishop Bennison to the Title IV Review Committee. "After reviewing all the material before them, he issued a Presentment and delivered it to my office." The Title IV Review Committee is formed by the General Convention of The Episcopal Church and serves as a Grand Jury for the Church.

"Speaking with Bishop Bennison before any of this was made public, I then was obligated to Inhibit him due to the nature of the Presentment." Mrs. Jefferts Schori said she consulted with the Standing Committee of the Diocese of Pennsylvania to request their support of the Inhibition. She got it.

The Trial Court is now in the process of organization for the upcoming trial. A meeting with the Diocese is being scheduled with representatives from her office within the next few weeks according to Jefferts Schori.

The Diocese will hold an open forum to which representatives from the Presiding Bishop's Office and the members of the Standing Committee of the Diocese of Pennsylvania will attend regarding the presentment and inhibition of Bennison. The implications of these actions will be explained and discussed at Saint Mary's, Wayne, on Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 3 p.m. A "Question and Answer" section will take place after the presentations. Those attending on behalf of the Presiding Bishop's Office are Clayton Matthews, Bishop for Pastoral Development, Office of Pastoral Development of the Episcopal Church and David Beers, Esq., Chancellor to the Presiding Bishop.

Since the announcement of Bennison's inhibition, a number of people have written to VOL recounting their experiences with Bennison over the years when he came to visit parishes. One layman wrote VOL with this story, "A couple of years ago when I was on the vestry of a local Episcopal Church, Bishop Bennison attended a vestry meeting after Mass. I probed him about theology. I told him that it was my understanding that he did not believe in the Virgin Birth of Jesus. His response was meandering with him ultimately saying that he believed that the idea that the Holy Spirit raped the Blessed Virgin Mary to conceive Jesus was an acceptable theological position to hold."

Another area of confusion is just how many congregations and communicants are in the Diocese of PA. The Diocese of PA boasts that it has 155 congregations in the five-county area with some 33,000 communicants. According to a Yahoo report on the diocese, it appears the diocese hasn't a clue how many members it has. When I logged on to Yahoo and typed in Diocese of PA the numbers revealed that it had only 22,000 members in 155 congregations. The diocesan website shows it has 53,576 baptized members, with 44,000 active, but less than 18,000 average Sunday attendance..

Parish closures continue apace. In the last ten years, Bennison, who has repeatedly said the "Diocese has never been more healthy, with growing attendance and dedicated congregations," has managed to systemically close parishes that he claimed were not worth keeping open. He has closed 14 parishes, some of these are orthodox.

His predecessor, Allan Bartlett, only closed three parishes: St. Luke's, Eddystone; St. Giles, Stonehurst Hills, Upper Darby and St. Paul's, Overbrook.

Bennison takes first prize in the amount of closures he's enforced. Here is the most recent list:

All Saints', Crescentville
Atonement, Morton
Calvary/S. Paul's, South Philadelphia
Emmanuel & Good Shepherd, Kensington
Transfiguration, West Chester
St. Aidan's, Cheltenham
St. Alban's, Olney
St. Bartholomew, Wissoniming
St. Elisabeth's, South Philadelphia
St. James-the-Less, Philadelphia
St. Martin's, Boothwyn
St. Peter's, Broomall
St. Peter's, Germantown
St. Philip's, Grays Ferry, South Philadelphia

The real tragedy of Bennison's legacy is his treatment and contempt for Fr David Ousley and the closure of St. James-the-Less, which after 160 years was forced out of their Clearfield Street property. The black community not only lost a beloved church and a church school where local children could be educated, but also a friend and pastor in Fr Ousley who worked tirelessly on their behalf. The neighborhood no longer has an Anglo-Catholic presence, thanks to Bennison.

There the Church of St. James-the-Less, stands in all its gothic splendor, empty, lifeless, like the inhabitants of its church-yard. The diocese cannot afford to maintain it, unlike the parishioners who lovingly cared and nurtured it during its 160 year history. It is sad that Fr Ousley and his parishioners have to make do with the tiny cemetery chapel at W. Laurel Hill. The Black Community surrounding S. James-the-Less have been deprived of a first rate education for their children in the local neighborhood. Nothing has replaced it---the S. James School was located in the church's Parish House---complete with its own chapel. For more than a year, it has sat empty and neglected, lacking the sounds and presence of neighborhood inner city children of all races and backgrounds.

The newly constituted Standing Committee ought to be ashamed of themselves for allowing Bennison to close this church. It would be nothing short of a miracle if the Standing Committee would allow Fr Ousley and the parish to return to their former property.

Meanwhile, the diocese is having to pay for churches that are empty, thanks to Bennison. The diocese is employing a Sexton/caretaker to look after the St. James-the-Less property, and will have to pay out huge sums for maintaining a parish church which no longer worships in the building.

It is this writer's contention that the Standing Committee made a mistake in allowing Bennison to go after Father Moyer and Fr. Eddy Rix of All Saints, Wynnewood. Bennison brought charges against Rix in Africa for officiating without a license. He was "convicted" and "sentenced" to preach the gospel. Bennison did nothing after that although he has asked the Standing Committee for permission to sue All Saints.

The Standing Committee now has a chance to redeem themselves from further embarrassment - they can do the honorable thing and give these parishes their independence, which will help the very neighborhoods and communities to which they minister.

At the recent Diocesan convention, delegates ignored the 800-pound elephant in the cathedral - Charles Bennison - the man who watched his brother seduce a 14-year old girl and did nothing about it. A public trial will reveal just how dysfunctional the bishop is. It will also reveal how dysfunctional the standing committee was throughout all this and how accountable they all will be before the whole diocese.

Wrote one angry parishioner to VOL, "This is not only a dysfunctional bishop but an equally dysfunctional diocese. The diocese carried on like there was nothing amiss with Bennison smiling his way through the day like nothing was wrong. In the area of mental disorders there is the concept of 'Non-arrestable' Criminality. This is a person who betrays trust, tries to control other people, builds himself up by tearing others down, and generally regards himself as the center of the universe around whom everything must revolve. Showing considerable arrogance and lacking empathy, this individual may be forgiven for his flaws because he is brilliant, talented, and accomplished. He may not cross the line into committing arrestable acts.

"Perhaps, he has committed crimes but has been clever enough so far not to get caught. Although not an adjudicated "criminal," he leaves a trail of injury behind -- invariably emotional injury, perhaps financial injury. From the standpoint of the harm that he inflicts on others, his conduct is criminal. He victimizes others but refuses to take responsibility for what he has done. If held accountable, he offers innumerable justifications and rationalizations. In the nomenclature of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association, he is considered to have a "narcissistic personality disorder." Getting this person to look in the mirror to recognize that he has flaws is a formidable task for any psychotherapist or counselor. This is a perfect description of Charles E. Bennison the ousted bishop of Pennsylvania. That he and his brother are not going to jail is because of the statute of limitations on the sexual abuse."

The Standing Committee has sought to assure the Clergy and people of the Diocese of Pennsylvania that it "has and will continue to exercise its canonical responsibilities in the best interests of the Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Pennsylvania," adding that the committee will work with Matthews, Rehill and diocesan leaders, both lay and clergy, "to develop and implement plans for exercising ecclesiastical authority in the absence of a diocesan bishop."

The two counts of the presentment center on accusations that Bennison, when he was rector of St. Mark's Episcopal Church in Upland, California, did not respond properly after learning sometime in 1973 that his brother, John, who worked as a lay youth minister in the parish, was having a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old member of the youth group. John Bennison was also married at the time, according to the presentment.

The bishop is accused of not taking any steps to end the sexual abuse of the girl, not providing proper pastoral care to the girl, not investigating whether she needed medical care, taking three years to notify the girl's parents, not reporting his brother to anyone, not investigating whether his brother was sexually involved with any other parishioners or other children, and seeking no advice on how to proceed. The presentment says Charles Bennison reacted "passively and self-protectively."


Bennison will continue to be paid during the time that he is inhibited. He will have an opportunity to respond to the presentment's charges. A date for the trial before the Court for the Trial of a Bishop is yet to be set.

END

Spiritual Insights from the Disciples of Christ



Alexander Campbell founded the Disciples of Christ (Christian Church) to unite all Protestant denominations. The Disciples split into four or more separate sects. Donald McGavran, co-inventor (with Satan) of the Church Growth Movement, was a Disciples of Christ missionary.

***

From a Church of Christ (Cambellite) Member:

A more accurate title would be “LCMS Pastor versus the Campbellite Church”.

I once considered joining the LCMS, and I worshiped at a LCMS congregation during the Lent season last year, but I came to not believe in sola scriptura anymore, and thus I could not stay there.

At any rate, the Lutherans are Christians, even if some are anti-Catholic, and beyond this, they hold onto a lot of the tenets of the Catholic Church; there should be some parallels between the Lutheran and Catholic positions within this exposition. Attached is a Word document which leads to a 31 page exposition written by an LCMS pastor. The largest part of it is on baptism, specifically believer’s immersion.

LCMS vs Campbellite

***

GJ - McGavran worked with the World Council of Churches and endorsed the ministry of death via Planned Parenthood. His denomination is strong throughout Illinois and a swath down toward Texas. LBJ was a Disciples member. The Disciples are one of the most Left-wing of all Protestant groups. They once confessed at convention to betraying three revolutions: the American, the French, and the Communist!

The blog writer seems to be Church of Christ, a fundamentalist break-off from the Disciples. The Church of Christ is opposed to instrumental music in church, so they have developed fine, four-part hymn singing.

Did You Miss Chemnitz' Birthday, Too?




09 November 2007
+ Martin Chemnitz +
9 November AD 1522 – 8 April AD 1586


From Aardvark Alley

Today marks the birthday of Martin Chemnitz, Pastor and Confessor. We regard him as, after Martin Luther, the Lutheran Church's most important theologian. He possessed a penetrating intellect and an almost encyclopedic knowledge of Scripture and the Church Fathers combined with a genuine love for the Church.

Doctrinal quarrels after Luther's death in 1546 led Chemnitz to give himself fully to the restoration of unity in the Lutheran Church. He became the leading spirit and a principal author of the 1577 Formula of Concord, which settled the doctrinal disputes on the basis of the Scriptures and largely succeeded in restoring unity among Lutherans. Work on the Formula led Chemnitz and others to gather all the normative doctrinal statements confessed by the Lutherans, from the ancient creeds through the Evangelical writings of the 16th Century, into one volume, the Book of Concord.

Chemnitz also authored the four volume Examination of the Council of Trent (1565-1573). This monumental work saw him rigorously subjecting the pronouncements of this Roman Catholic Council to judgment by Scripture and the Church Fathers. The Examination is the definitive Lutheran answer to the Concilium Tridentinum and an outstanding exposition of the faith of the Augsburg Confession.

While he was an outstanding academic, Chemnitz also ably served in church administration. He joined the Wittenberg University faculty in January 1554 and was ordained into the Office of the Holy Ministry by Johannes Bugenhagen in November of that same year. Then, after serving for several years as co-adjutor of the churches in the region of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, he became Superintendent (ecclesiastical supervisor), holding the post until his death. In this capacity, he worked diligently to balance the congregations' autonomy, particularly in calling pastors, with input and oversight by the the area ministerium.

As theologian and a churchman, "the Second Martin" was truly a gift of God to the Church. This is why the expression was coined, Si Martinus non fuisset, Martinus vix stetisset. ("If Martin [Chemnitz] had not come along, Martin [Luther] would hardly have survived.")

***

GJ - The Lutheran Reformation was not only blessed with Luther and Melanchthon, but also with Chemnitz and the Concordists (fellow editors of the Book of Concord). ELCA and its predecessor bodies cleverly avoided mentioning anything after 1530, so those pastors have almost no knowledge of the Book of Concord.

When I was doing my doctoral dissertation at Notre Dame, I realized that the Lutheran Church in America had more in common with liberal Baptists like Rauschenbusch than with Luther and Chemnitz. My real education in the Book of Concord came from being surrounded by Church Growth robots in WELS. Every aspect of Biblical, Lutheran doctrine was constantly under sttack by these self-inflated gurus.

I created Martin Chemnitz Press to honor the Second Martin and to generate a little more knowledge about this great theologian. I confess to being a complete failure among fellow Boomers: I cannot convert Lutheran pastors to Lutheran doctrine. They bow either to Fuller Seminary, the Antichrist in Rome, or his clone in Constantinople. However, there is hope among the younger pastors and laity.

***

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Did You Miss Chemnitz' Birthday, Too?":

I just finished reading a 24 page paper on Chemnitz yesterday! Very good and interesting. Most of the material in it came from J.A.O. Preus's book. I wonder though how Chemnitz justified to himself the doing of personal horoscopes for the Duke? We all have our faults I suppose. His expertise in Astrology is curious and it seems as though he himself doubted the believability of it. What do you make of this area of interest on his part? But still he was magnificent and as you point out, the Romanists even admit if it were not for MC the work of ML would have barely survived. Thanks to God for such an incredible gift to the Church and Lutheran teaching and for a great defender against false teachers.

***

GJ - God works in mysterious way, His wonders to perform. Astrology got Chemnitz into a fabulous library when books were still expensive. That gave Chemnitz a remarkable education in the Church Fathers. He took notes. He also saw the emptiness of astrology. Melanchthon believed in signs and omens. We have to remember that the Reformers were Medieval men, raised in that nonsense. Look at the Medieval focus on Mary and Purgatory. That they overcame those illusions is quite remarkable.

Here is one source on that topic.

The Jack Preus bio of Chemnitz is worth owning and reading.

Chemnitz is not the only one who saved the Lutheran Reformation. God had a deep bench in that era. However, he was clearly the best of the theologians after Luther.

Trinity 23 Sermon




Trinity 23

KJV Philippians 3:17 Brethren, be followers together of me, and mark them which walk so as ye have us for an ensample. 18 (For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ: 19 Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things.) 20 For our conversation [citizenship] is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ: 21 Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.

KJV Matthew 22:15 Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in his talk. 16 And they sent out unto him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men. 17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not? 18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites? 19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. 20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? 21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's. 22 When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way.

The Twenty-third Sunday after Trinity

The Hymn #413
The Invocation p. 15
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual Phil 3:17-22
The Gospel Matthew 22:15-22
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #277
The Sermon

Our Citizenship Is in Heaven

The Offertory p. 22
The Hymn #305
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #283


Our Citizenship Is in Heaven


Phil 3:20 For our conversation [citizenship] is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ: 21 Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.

This letter is called the Epistle of Joy because of the exuberant spirit throughout the text. Paul did not engage in the happy-talk we find so often on news shows and church services. The first part of this passage denounces the enemies of the cross.

Mark—or carefully observe—certain of the leaders and follow their example. Paul does not refer only to himself, but to others as well. The first leaders of the Christian Church must have been courageous and strong, trusting in Christ alone for their salvation. They had to resist all the excesses of the Roman Empire, the sins of the flesh, while maintaining the pure doctrine of Christ in a pagan world. Paganism will always be popular because of its veneration of the self. Many would say, “the celebration of self” today.

Paul Tillich, the famous and now largely forgotten philosopher-theologian, always emphasized “autonomy.” That meant he was a law unto himself. Posing as a Christian theologian, he was one of the enemies of the cross, denounced by Paul in this chapter. To be brief, he was the Bill Clinton of the theologians.

People may think at first that the enemies of the cross are those pagans persecuting the Christian Church. Not so. The enemies are those righteous individuals who strike everyone as wise, saintly, and pure but inwardly despise the Word of God. They are within the visible church but not within the Kingdom of God. There are obvious enemies whose conduct is so bad that no one can deny the fact. But Luther pointed out the greater danger of those who are righteous through their own works.

In general, righteousness through the Law is promoted two ways. The first is rather obvious to an outsider, but not to the practitioners. Certain rules are set up so that violation of those rules equals damnation. Observing the rules means salvation. All world religions are based on this, although the rules may vary.

Many denominations emphasize a heavy-handed legalism where the same effects can be seen. They make Moses their Savior by teaching salvation through the Law. They make Jesus the Law-giver by equating the Christian faith with a list of laws rather than the Gospel message of forgiveness.

Since people and organizations based on the law must be perfect, they have no tolerance for someone who says, “We are not observing our own rules.” One former Mormon worked at a Mormon college. They taught against Coca-cola in class, but the teachers’ lounge had a vending machine for Coke. When the teacher, as a faithful Mormon, pointed out the gap between teaching and practice, he received death threats. Eventually he became a Christian and wrote about it. His wife left him because he was a Mormon apostate, but she converted later and returned to him. The pull on him to go back to an outward observance of Mormonism to keep her happy was strong.

Christians become law-salesmen by turning Gospel motivation into Law threats. Soon they have a large body of canon law in their publications, to observe and become scholars of that law, which may be several decades old or—best of all for them—unwritten but understood.

Those are more obvious manifestations of religion as law. The other perversion is much more subtle. Those people are the holiest, best, and wisest of all. Nothing can be said against them outwardly. They are enemies of the cross because they trust in their own righteousness for salvation. These people are the ones who hate the Gospel because righteousness is alien, from Christ, rather than from their efforts, virtue, and observances.

Citizenship in Heaven
NKJ Philippians 3:20 For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also eagerly wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, 21 who will transform our lowly body that it may be conformed to His glorious body, according to the working by which He is able even to subdue all things to Himself.

Luther and the Confessions teach us that we should long for this manifestation rather than cling to the glories of this life. If we treasure the Gospel, then our hearts will be with that treasure. Only one thing can be first. If the Gospel is in second or third place, it can be bartered down to a much lower place easily enough, and then forgotten. In the Parable of the Sower, some of the seed is choked by the cares and concerns of this world.

There are two ways of looking at this matter. The first way is the majority view, the unbeliever’s perspective. In that situation, worldly wealth and honors are all-important. All we have to do is look at all the awards and citations offered. Both cable/TV companies in Phoenix brag about their J. D. Powers awards for service. All of the Phoenix customers scratch our heads about both awards.

Lutherans give each other awards all the time. When Dorothy Sonntag left her editorial position in WELS to join the ELCA, the WELS magazine blessed her apostasy and noted her recent journalism awards. Many people feel validated by awards and honors. Many avoid the cross by clinging to the awards and honors. Nothing will stop the awards faster than clinging to the Word alone. Friendships dry up as well.

Citizenship in heaven means our primary loyalty and love is fixed on Christ, the author and perfecter of our faith.

KJV Hebrews 12:1 Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us, 2 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.

The Law by itself can only lead to death. Our bodies show that we have inherited mortality, by the way in which time emphasizes the inevitable weakness of the flesh. The appeal of the Law alone is to create a system that pays for these sins, by abstaining from them or atoning for them. That can only lead to spiritual pride (I did it) or despair (This is impossible to do). In end we can fool ourselves and everyone else, but not God.

The way of salvation is clear throughout the Scriptures, from Genesis to Revelation. People get confused about it because they are fed misconceptions.

For instance, I am teaching a bunch of eager Evangelicals at a private university. Every so often one will say, “The Old Testament is Law. The New Testament is Gospel.” I get to say, “No, the Old Testament is full of Gospel promises. Every comforting passage, every promise of the Messiah is Gospel.” Abraham was justified by faith in Christ.

The Holy Spirit works through the Law to create contrition
The Law of God brings about contrition, true sorrow for sin. We harden our hearts so easily that this work is very important, but often misunderstood. Godly contrition is not a work of man, but the result of the Holy Spirit working through the Law. If we rely on common sense as a motivation, it is not God’s Law at work. So, someone might say, “Living together before marriage increases the risk of divorce.” That is a statistic and not God’s Law. Using the Law means saying, “Living together before marriage is despising God’s Word. God created marriage.” When I said that to a man who said he loved God’s Word, he decided to marry the mother of his three children. He also began lessons in the Christian faith.

The Holy Spirit Convicts Us – Lack of Faith

KJV John 10:37 If I do not the works of my Father, believe me not. 38 But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works: that ye may know, and believe, that the Father is in me, and I in him.

KJV John 16:8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: 9 Of sin, because they believe not on me; 10 Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more; 11 Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.

The primary sin is lack of faith in Christ. Unfortunately, it is much easier to preach about the carnal sins of the Prodigal: wasting money on fast women, slow horses, and booze.

It is too easy to prescribe a law solution for a law problem: “This is what you must do.” The famous mega-churches are doing so well because they advocate man-made law solutions for felt-need problems. No conversion to the Christian faith is necessary.

Luther saw that the Law had been preached with infinite harshness for a thousand years, with little emphasis on the true Gospel. He did not give up being a monk when the Reformation started in 1517. He did not marry for 8 years. He was saturated with the idea of works-righteousness, earning his own salvation. Luther knew from his own experience that complete trust in Christ was the real Gospel, despising any idea of earning or deserving salvation.

A desert father said this in the earliest days of the Church, “What a heavy burden we cast off when we stop justifying ourselves. What a light burden we take up when we are justified by Christ.”

KJV Matthew 11:28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.

The Gospel Alone Saves
The Law cannot save and cannot bear fruit. However, we need the Law to show us our need for the Savior.

The Gospel alone saves and bears fruit in the believer’s life. The Gospel declares the work of Christ in atoning for our sins. Someone is justified by faith when he says, “Christ died for my sins and rose from the dead.”

KJV Romans 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: 2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God. 3 And not only so, but we glory in tribulations also: knowing that tribulation worketh patience; 4 And patience, experience; and experience, hope: 5 And hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us. 6 For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. 7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. 8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. 9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. 10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

The famous Romans passage should be committed to memory, because justification by faith is so clearly and beautifully expressed. The universal nature of the Atonement is combined with individual justification by faith. The Atonement is universal because Christ died for the sins of the world, for all time. Justification is individual because a group does not believe. Even in the most hide-bound, legalistic Lutheran sect, some of the people in church do not believe the Gospel. Unbelievers are not justified: they are not declared righteous by the Word of God.

The seed of faith is planted in newly baptized babies. If this seed is nurtured, the child will grow in the Christian faith. The Parable of the Sower teaches us the ways in which this seed is taken away, scorched, or choked by cares. This same parable also assures us that the careless sowing of the seed of the Word will still produce an astonishing yield.

Who is talking when a pastor (or congregation) says: “Nothing is happening. This is useless, worthless. If only we were big, glorious, successful, featured in the Saturday religion page, or better, in Time magazine…”? That is Satan speaking to someone’s emotions. That is where we are weak, so that is where he attacks. Despair and discouragement are the chief weapons of the Evil Foe. One Church and Change guru even made fun of those who think “faithfulness is enough.” That is right out of the Devil’s Handbook. He went on to mock faithful Lutherans, saying, “We four. No more. Shut the door.” Yes, make people ashamed of the Gospel by painting the faithful as villains.

Opponents of the Gospel—“false sons within the pale”— are part of the territory and help us appreciate the Word of God and the Confessions. Weapons against falsehood must be constantly sharpened by use, so we should be thankful for opposition, not resentful.

The Gospel Promises
The Gospel is all comfort and places no demands upon us. Any law requirement corrupts the Gospel. So, “You are forgiven if you give up alcohol” is not Gospel, but the worst perversion, Gospel mixed with Law. It is very important to distinguish these two matters, Law and Gospel. If that demand is made and accepted, it leads to despair. “I am no good. I cannot give it up. I am lost.”

It is quite another message to say, “Christ has paid for your sins and will give you the strength to resist this temptation. You may fall again, many times over, but He will always be your source of strength and the cause of your forgiveness.” Only the Gospel can strengthen us against the temptations of life. “You can tie a hog ever so tightly to a tree, but you cannot keep him from squealing.” (Luther) Thus the Old Adam can be constrained and limited but never eliminated while we are alive.

Some will say, “What about faith? Doesn’t the Gospel demand faith? Isn’t that a Law demand?” As Walther said, the command to believe is a gracious invitation, not a demand. If someone comes to our home and we say, “Please stay for dinner, we have plenty to eat,” is this not a gracious invitation? It is not a demand. When we offer a gift, the gift is received.

So the Gospel is proclaimed and taught, administered in the visible form of Holy Baptism and Holy Communion. The Promises of God are never without the Holy Spirit, who stirs up faith the first time and awakens and deepens faith repeatedly.
What God provides in the Means of Grace is renewed by the Means of Grace, Word and Sacrament. This is how God works such great abundance in the lives of believers.

Results of the Gospel
Phil 3:20 For our conversation [citizenship] is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ: 21 Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.

I remember Leroy, a retired scientist, who used to refer to his body as “an old jackass.” As he aged, he experienced the vileness of his weakening body. His heart did not work right. His neck required a brace at times.

Christ gives us His righteousness. He also promises us that He will give us a glorious new body for eternity.

KJV John 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life. 25 Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live. 26 For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself; 27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man. 28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, 29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

Paul elaborated on this teaching of Christ in the great resurrection passage of 1 Corinthians. The harmony and unity of the Scriptures should fill us with wonder:

KJV 1 Corinthians 15:42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption: 43 It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power: 44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body. 45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. 47 The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven. 48 As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly. 49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.

We are weak and frail creatures, prone to pride, sloth, greed, envy, lust, and covetousness. If we trust in our own merit, who can stand up against a cross-examination? But we have the glorious promises of the Gospel, the declaration of forgiveness, and the Promises of the resurrection before us.

Let us learn from our Good Shepherd, Who is meek and lowly, and take up the light burden and easy yoke of justification by faith.

Quotations


"Emphatically does Scripture state that the action of the Spirit covers the whole life from first to the last. He is the Spirit of Life for regeneration (John 3:5, 8): the Spirit of Sonship for adoption (Romans 8:15): the Spirit of holiness for sanctification (Romans 8:5): the Spirit of Glory for transfiguration (2 Corinthians 3:18); the Spirit of Promise for the resurrection (Ephesians 1:13). Only through the Holy Spirit are men drawn to the Author and Finisher of their salvation."
Arthur H. Drevlow, "God the Holy Spirit Acts to Build the Church," God The Holy Spirit Acts, ed., Eugene P. Kaulfield, Milwaukee: Northwestern Publishing House, 1972, p. 15. John 3: 5,8; Romans 8:5; Romans 8:15; 2 Corinthians 3:18; Ephesians 1:13

"Now, Paul's thought here is that nothing should be taught and practiced in the Church but what is unquestionably God's Word. It will not do to introduce or perform anything whatever upon the strength of man's judgment. Man's achievements, man's reasoning and power, are of no avail save in so far as they come from God."
Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 229 Twelfth Sunday after Trinity 2 Corinthians 3:4-11;

"Note further, that it is his ministry to which Paul ascribes the preparation of their heart thereon and the inscription which constitutes them 'living epistles of Christ.' He contrasts this ministry with the blind fancies of those fanatics who seek to receive, and dream of having, the Holy Spirit without the oral word; who, perchance, creep into a corner and grasp the Spirit through dreams, directing the people away from the preached Word and visible ministry. But Paul says that the Spirit, through his preaching, has wrought in the hearts of his Corinthians, to the end that Christ lives and is mighty in them."
Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. p. 226. Twelfth Sunday after Trinity 2 Corinthians 3:4-11; Deuteronomy 6:6-9, 11, 18

"The Spirit is the ink or the inscription, yes, even the writer himself; but the pencil or pen and the hand of the writer is the ministry of Paul. This figure of a written epistle is, however, in accord with Scripture usage. Moses commands (Deuteronomy 6:6-9, 11, 18) that the Israelites write the Ten Commandments in all places where they walked or stood--upon the posts of their houses, and upon their gates, and ever have them before their eyes and in their hearts."
Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 225. Twelfth Sunday after Trinity 2 Corinthians 3:4-11; Deuteronomy 6:6-9, 11, 18

"This epistle sounds altogether strange and wonderful to individuals unaccustomed to Scripture language, particularly to that of Paul. To the inexperienced ear and heart it is not intelligible."
Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 223. Twelfth Sunday after Trinity 2 Corinthians 3:4-11

"It is a glory which every preacher may claim, to be able to say with full confidence of heart: 'This trust have I toward God in Christ, that what I teach and preach is truly the Word of God.' Likewise, when he performs other officials duties in the Church--baptizes a child, absolves and comforts a sinner--it must be done in the same firm conviction that such is the command of Christ. He who would teach and exercise authority in the Church without this glory, 'it is profitable for him,' as Christ says, (Matthew 18:6), 'that a great millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be sunk in the depths of the sea.' For the devil's lies he preaches, and death is what he effects."
Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 227. Twelfth Sunday after Trinity 2 Corinthians 3:4-11; Matthew 18:6

"The Law of God, which is also contained in Scripture, must be excluded from the concept 'means of grace,' because the Law does not assure those who have transgressed it—and all men have transgressed it—of the remission of their sins, or God's grace, but on the contrary proclaims God's wrath and condemnation. For this reason the Law is expressly called...'the ministry of condemnation,' whereas the Gospel is...'the ministry of righteousness' (2 Corinthians 3:9)."
Francis Pieper, Christian Dogmatics, 3 vols., trans., Walter W. F. Albrecht, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1953, III, p. 105. 2 Corinthians 3:9.

"And this call of God, which is made through the preaching of the Word, we should not regard as jugglery, but know that thereby God reveals His will, that in those whom He thus calls He will work through the Word, that they may be enlightened, converted, and saved. For the Word, whereby we are called, is a ministration of the Spirit, that gives the Spirit, or whereby the Spirit is given, 2 Corinthians 3:8, and a power of God unto salvation, Romans 1:16. And since the Holy Ghost wishes to be efficacious through the Word, and to strengthen and give power and ability, it is God's will that we should receive the Word, believe and obey it."
Formula of Concord, SD XI. #29. Election. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 1073. Tappert, p. 621. Heiser, p. 289. 2 Corinthians 3:8; Romans 1:16.