Monday, December 27, 2010

Sound Familiar? - Your Synod Is Full of Zwinglism

Admit it, synodical slaves, Zwingli is your leader.


"They [the Zwinglians] divorced the Word and the Spirit, separated the person who preaches and teaches the Word from God, who works through the Word, and separated the servant who baptizes from God, who has commanded the Sacrament. They fancied that the Holy Spirit is given and works without the Word, that the Word merely gives assent to the Spirit, whom it already finds in the heart. If, then, this Word does not find the Spirit but a godless person, then it is not the Word of God. In this way they falsely judge and define the Word, not according to God, who speaks it, but according to the man who receives it. They want only that to be the Word of God which is fruitful and brings peace and life..."



[1] Martin Luther, What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 664f. 

The Age of Pietism Gave Us UOJ




The Age of Pietism Gave Us UOJ

Important Dates

Martin Luther lived 1483-1546. Melanchthon lived 1497-1560.
The 95 Theses were written in 1517.
The Augsburg Confession in 1530, the Book of Concord compiled in 1580.
Zwingli died on the battlefield in 1529.
Calvin published his Institutes in 1536 and lived until 1564.
Spener published his Pious Wishes in 1675.
Halle University was established in 1694, under Spener’s direction.
Muhlenberg came to America, a graduate of Halle, in 1742.
Knapp lectured at Halle University, where he had been a student, and became a full professor in 1782.
Woods translated Knapp’s theology lectures into English in 1831.[1]
Walther landed in New Orleans with the Stephan group in 1839.
Hoenecke graduated from Halle in 1859.    

Reformation
            All false doctrine begins with Enthusiasm, the separation of the Holy Spirit from the Word. Zwingli and Calvin were Swiss pioneers of this error in Protestantism, as shown in the Biblical section. Zwingli said arrogantly, that the Holy Spirit does not need a vehicle, like an ox cart. Calvin said as much, though more elegantly. Zwingli died early, on the battlefield and published relatively little. Calvin’s ministry was much longer and he published extensively, including a complete set of Biblical commentaries still used today. The two leaders established a break with the Lutheran Reformation, in spite of many conferences and discussions. This essential difference, Enthusiasm, remains the divide between Biblical Lutheran doctrine, the historic Christian faith, and all false religion.

Spener
The second source of Enthusiasm came from Philipp Jakob Spener, who modeled his cell group method after Labadie’s, a Calvinist and former Roman Catholic. Intense Roman Catholic piety is encouraged in small groups, perhaps because the large scale Mass is so impersonal and mechanical. The falsehoods of Roman Catholicism are also due to Enthusiasm. The Holy Spirit works primarily through the Pope, who is considered and proclaimed the conduit of God’s grace, the ultimate keeper of the keys. Roman Catholics are encouraged to participate in lengthy, intense, and emotional prayer meetings, with rosaries and objects of devotion, such as the relics of saints. Every single Roman Catholic parish has a relic from a saint, certified by the Vatican, built into the altar. Many have noticed the parallel between Roman Catholic sanctification, with its emphasis upon receiving grace from prayer, and the Reformed sects, which also emphasize grace coming from prayer.
Spener started Pietism with his Pia Desideria (Pious Wishes) in 1675. He wrote a long essay as an introduction to a popular orthodox book of sermons by Johann Arndt, so Arndt's book served inadvertently as a launching pad for Pietism.
Hallmarks of Pietism are:
  1. A heart religion instead of a head religion, they claim. Pietists often mention that false distinction.
  2. Lay-led conventicles or cell groups, to develop piety through prayer and Bible study. Spener began cell groups in 1699.
  3. Unionism - cooperation between Lutherans and the Reformed. Spener was the first union theologian (Heick, II, p. 23).
  4. An emphasis on good works and foreign missions. "Deeds, not creeds" is a popular motto.
  5. Denial of the Real Presence and baptismal regeneration, consequences of working with the Reformed. (Heick, II, p. 24)
  6. A better, higher, or deeper form of Christianity rather than the Sunday worshiping church. This often made the cell group the real church, the gathered church, superior to those who merely worship and participate in the Means of Grace.

            The issue for justification is the source of God’s grace in forgiveness. The Scriptures, the Book of Concord, Luther, Chemnitz, Gerhard, and all the orthodox Lutherans teach that grace comes only from the Means of Grace. The non-Lutheran Protestants deny this. Roman Catholics use the term Means of Grace, but they apply a different meaning, because they have seven sacraments that fail to deliver complete and free forgiveness of sin. Purgatory is that place where forgiveness is earned through countless years of torture. Pietism is the Protestant version of that style of sanctification.
            Spener influenced the ruler to found Halle University in 1694, to teach actual Biblical studies, which had been neglected in favor of ferocious dogmatic struggles between the Lutherans and Calvinists. Halle and the charitable foundations around it became so imbued with sacred awe that no one could question the school, Spener, or its influence.
            Few appreciate the substance, scope, and continuing influence of Pietism among the Lutherans in America. Spener had such a reputation among Lutherans that very few criticized him. Walther, who blasted many religious figures in his journalistic fervor, never dealt with Spener in his famous Law and Gospel lectures. Walther experienced an awakening through the Pietists and worked in Pietistic circles, before he came to America under Bishop Stephan, a Pietist.
            Walther was no different from other American Lutheran pioneers:
  1. Muhlenberg came over from Halle University, the center of European Pietism, a school created to promote Pietism. Thus the LCA’s Muhlenberg tradition was an extension of Halle’s Pietism.
  2. The Norwegians, Swedes, and Danes were Pietists, with certain exceptions - the Happy Danes.
  3. The Wisconsin Synod’s most famous theologian, Adolph Hoenecke, was trained at Halle University under Tholuck, the last of the true Pietists, although he admitted being a Universalist.
In short, this means that almost all Lutheran church bodies in America, from the colonial Muhlenberg tradition (the Lutheran Church in America) to the Evangelical Lutheran Synod (1917) were Pietistic in origin.
            Pietism was unionistic from the beginning, and Spener is considered the first union theologian. His compromise over doctrine, making love more important, enabled Lutherans and other Protestants to work together without doctrinal agreement, a situation that led to a complete lack of doctrinal discernment and ultimately Unitarianism. His emphasis upon lay leadership and cell groups also moved people into an experiential form of worship, where feelings mattered far more than fidelity to the Word of God. The Confessions became insignificant because they were considered divisive.
            Given the sacrosanct status of Pietism among American Lutherans, the copying of the double- justification scheme from Halle professor George Christian Knapp was only natural. He was highly respected as the last old-fashioned Pietist at Halle. Significantly, Halle was honored as the center of all that American Lutherans admired and emulated. Probably few then realized how far Halle had fallen in basic doctrine, just as few realize today how bad their “conservative” seminaries are – in the lap of Fuller, Willow Creek, and New Agers like Leonard Sweet.
Untouchables – Franke, Zinzendorf, Bengel, Burk
            Francke met with Spener, adopted his program, and got into a world of trouble over Pietism. Spener had Francke appointed to the newly established Halle University. Francke remained there as a professor and pastor of a congregation for the next 36 years. His energy spread the influence of Pietism, both in his charity work (Halle Orphanage) and his Biblical teaching.
Count Zinzendorf (1700-1760) had a profound effect on the spread of Pietism, not only through his contact and friendship with Wesley, but also by being the father of world missions. Methodism is another form of Pietism. The English Methodist George Scott influenced Carl Olaf Rosenius, who founded Swedish Pietism.[2] Zinzendorf is also known for his "Come Lord Jesus" prayer and his hymns.
Pietistic hymns emphasize the blood of Jesus because of the influence of Johann Albrecht Bengel, famous for his Gnomon. (Heick, II, p. 25) Bengel's son-in-law, Burk, may be the inventor of Objective Justification. Burk e is credited by Hoenecke for this statement:
Hoenecke: “And Ph. D. Burk (Rechtfertigung und Versicherung, p. 41) rightly said:
‘The difference between general justification and the more common usage of the term justification can be expressed as follows. The latter takes place precisely upon the appropriation of the former.’
An emphasis upon general justification is necessary in order to safeguard the material content of the Gospel.
We need furnish no extraordinary proof in regard to the justification of the individual sinner; let us suffice with the story of the publican. Justification takes place in the one who appeals to the grace of God, but it does not take place in the Pharisee. And the entirety of Scripture demonstrates that he who believes is always justified; this applies to every individual, the moment that faith is kindled in him.” (Hoenecke, III,  p. 354)

Stepping Stones to Modernism – Tholuck, Schleiermacher, Barth
            Tholuck is considered the last of the Pietists who taught at Halle. The rest were rationalists. Although Tholuck is largely forgotten, he is important for two reasons. One is his role as mentor of Adolph Hoenecke, the dogmatician who helped the Pietistic and unionistic Wisconsin Synod become Lutheran. Another is his reputation for being a bridge between the old Pietists who had faith and the new theologians who were rationalists. Tholuck was a blend, who took the Objective Justification of old Knapp and turned it into Universalism. Tholuck was a confessed Univesalist who simply declared that all men are saved.  That does not make Hoenecke a Universalist, but the historical facts help the student of theology see the UOJ connections to Pietism.
            Friederich Schleiermacher, 1768-1834, was a Halle student and faculty member. He is the most important modern Halle professor, a pioneer of faith without belief, essential for such later theologians as Karl Barth and Paul Tillich. The modern theologians, with few exceptions, write about the articles of faith but make it clear that they reject the topics they consider with their enormous volumes.
            Karl Barth dominated the 20th century, thanks to long life and his joint-publication of the Dogmatics, which was largely written by his live-in mistress Charlotte Kirschbaum. Although known as a critic of Schleiermacher and a classical theologian (!), Barth extended the influence of faith without belief. He was—and probably still is—the central theologian for Fuller Seminary. He turned several Fuller leaders against inerrancy, who re-fashioned the school into a large-scale factory for liberal Evangelicals, Pentecostals, Missouri and WELS pastors.

Victory of Pietism
The current state of the Lutheran Church in North America constitutes proof that the visible expressions of the church have done more than lose their doctrinal heritage – they have consciously and persistently rejected it in favor of Enthusiasm, the source of all false doctrine.
This rejection has been the work of Lutheran Pietism, a curious amalgamation of Calvinistic doctrine and Lutheran identity, with Lutheran doctrine on the scaffold and Calvinism on the throne – and in the hangman’s role.
Some visible proofs of the victory of Pietism over Lutheran doctrine are:
  • Hatred of the Confessions.
  • Repudiation of Luther’s work.
  • Rejection of the historic liturgy and the Creeds.
  • Sermons replaced by coaching talks.
  • Cell groups.
  • Predominance of the Law, but chiefly man-made law, such as “You must be growing.”
  • Antinomianism, as if God’s Law is obsolete.
  • Silence about the efficacy of the Word.
  • Avoidance of the Means of Grace, or weak-kneed lip-service to this Biblical concept.
  • Receptionism in Holy Communion.
  • Tawdry gimmicks used in place of evangelism through the Word.
  • Obvious persecution of faithful pastors and shunning of faithful laity.
  • Promoting, defending, and rewarding false teachers.
  • Seminaries and colleges providing a tawdry Calvinistic education, with no one objecting.
  • District and synod officials in cahoots with the false teachers.
  • Feminist dogma leading to de facto women’s ordination.
  • Unionism with every possible sect.
  • Division, tension, hostility, polarization.
  • The silence of the shepherds and the slaughter of the lambs.


[1] “His translation of Georg Christian Knapp's Christian Theology (1831-1833) established his reputation, which was enhanced by his leadership in religious education. Strangely, his disastrous double-justification formula is remembered, but his name is unknown among Lutherans.
[2] Rosenius and Scott are identified with the Swedish Pietism of the Augustana Synod, whose college and seminary were established in Rock Island, Illinois. Augustana came under the influence of orthodoxy through Eric Norelius being trained at Capital Seminary in Columbus, Ohio. The more Pietistic side of this Swedish immigration to America formed the Mission Covenant and Evangelical Free denominations, both known today for their Church Growthism.

---

Narrow-minded Lutheran has left a new comment on your post "The Age of Pietism Gave Us UOJ":

Thanks for this post. One has to wonder why the Lutherans left the Prussian Union, toiled to get here, toiled to get established here, then immediately returned to the same old heresies.

What is equally ironic is that the Reformed guys, in an attempt to disassociate themselves with anything appearing remotely Roman, have created their own papacies, as you well-noted above.

Perhaps we could someday do a study of Grabau and the Buffalo Synod, as I can't find much material on the subject. Since everyone in today's Lutherdom seems to put down Grabau and the Buffalo Synod, they may have been doing something right. After all, if you're not a Walther idolater, you could be labeled a "hyper-Euro."

Thanks again for this post.

***

GJ - WELS, Missouri, and the ELS are so far away from Luther's doctrine that I am amazed they claim the name. No wait, they are jettisoning that now too. Good for them. I list myself as Church of the Augsburg Confession on Facebook. Lutheran means nothing when Ye Olde Synodical Conference runs down ELCA while working with ELCA on ELCA's terms.

WELS has topped that by denouncing the gaity of ELCA while publishing its own homosexual video on YouTube and Facebook, featuring its college students, one of them doing a Michael Jackson move, something too perverse for the Fire Island boys.

The current posts on justification are all from the book. Hoenecke did fascicle publishing of the Dogmatics. I am doing the same with a blog - cheaper and faster, and bound to please the tree-huggers.

Church and Change Merrily Ruling the Roost


To: Gregory L. Jackson
Sent: Fri, December 17, 2010 6:47:31 PM
Subject: Growing the church


A couple of interesting items from the recent WELS South Central Pastor Teacher Conference: - led by Glaeske - Patterson - Gurgle
******************************************************************************************************

President Glaeske's report:              http://scdwels.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/2010-10-dp-report.pdf 
 
"Vicar in Mission setting programs have been underwritten by Board for Home Missions. Holy Word's vicar has always been funded this way." (even though Holy Word's congregation has been around for over 30 years).


Conference Theological presentation:              http://scdwels.wordpress.com/essays-papers-presentations/

"Pastor Ken Fisher talked abour (sic) approaches and ways to fund minsteries (sic)":  http://scdwels.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/2010-10-minutes.pdf
***
GJ - Schuppe, Hunter, Richard Gurgle - all Changers, plus many more for the insiders to wink at.

As I wrote before, FIC-L (Lutheran on the outside, Church and Change on the inside) does not get many subscriptions and is very expensive. "Get out there and sell subscriptions."

Hint - dead tree publishing is over. Send the staff to a resume writing seminar.

Women's ministries is not new. It is as old as the church, according to the Doctrinal Pussycat. Rome says that about the Assumption of Mary too. The fact is, WELS already has women pastors. The synod is just waiting to formalize the obvious. Note Randy Hunter in a leadership position.

If you don't like anything in these links, write SP Schroeder a letter. He may even send a secret email that he is working on it, but it will take a few decades.

Tell Me What You Think about This Statement

Brought to you by the copy and paste babies.



Lutherans will find the following to be a familiar definition of justification:

This is very conveniently expressed by the terms objective and subjective justification. Objective justification is the act of God, by which he proffers pardon to all through Christ; subjective, is the act of man, by which he accepts the pardon freely offered in the Gospel. The former is universal, the latter not.

***

GJ - I would like you to respond to the quotation, in blue, above. Do you find it:

1. Correct according to the Book of Concord and the Scriptures.
2. In error for one or more reasons?
3. Ambiguous?

I am very interested in your opinion and the reasons for it.

Church and Change Discussions, December, 2010

----- Forwarded Message ----g

Helping Andy with Sisera counseling

From: John Hoh
To: church_and_change@yahoogroups.com
Cc: James Sonnemann
Sent: Sun, December 26, 2010 3:40:42 PM
Subject: Re: [church_and_change] Why Men Hate Going To Church


"When I was on the board of elders at my church, loosing (sic) folks was a grave topic of concern, one which no one seemed to have a clue what to do about except keep track of numbers and write strongly worded letters before eventually purging these lost souls from our membership roster. It wasn't a very satisfying or productive job."


I guess if all we do is keep track of numbers, write strongly worded letters, and eventually purge, we will keep doing the same things but wonder why we don't get different results.

This is not to judge what anyone is doing. There likely isn't a lot of training in reclaiming lost/slipping souls.

The numbers tracking-letter writing-list purging on the surface seems like a lack of a relationship building. What, precisely, is the problem in these peoples' lives? I'm sure there are multitudes of answers, and in essence the same answer. When I vicared a number of people said they didn't come because a pastor didn't visit a mom in the hospital or something similar. Probing further, I discovered the offending pastor wasn't the *current* pastor, nor even always the pastor before him; several claimed the offense was committed two or three pastors ago! OK, reality check. This congregation has had a different pastor--give him a chance!

Jim Sonnemann at Salem decided to turn this conundrum on its head. Instead of clubbing delinquents with the Law ("You oughtta be in church!"), he used a Gospel approach. He brought the Word and Sacrament to them, In essence this stated, "We hold these means of grace to be important and vital and will bring it to you if need be." Funny, people started coming to church after that.

When I vicared (1988-89) there was a determnination (sic), from my bishop anyway, that Sunday should be the day for worship and "mid-week" services. Well, if you do a survey and a host of people cite job obligations as a reason for not attending more, shouldn't we as a church find ways to accomodate (sic) those people? Is there a Law in Scripture that dictates which day we *must* worship? (Don't say "Third Commandment"--read it closely and the command speaks of rest for our bodies, NOT worship.) Sometimes people have jobs that prevent Sunday attendance. Think of nurses.

Again, tracking numbers, writing letters, purging lists are not wrong in and of themselves. They are tools. But maybe we need to think outside the box on this one.

John




JOHN L. HOH, JR. Free-Lance Writer (1-414-231-9920) 4859 N. 78th. St., Milwaukee, WI 53218 H2O Scrolls & Codices (HoneyMilk Publications, CheddarBrau Publications, and Vine & Sheaf Publications). See my website ( iProclaim Bookstore ) or check out Kindle format titles on Amazon for details!


--- On Sat, 12/25/10, syncroinc@aol.com wrote:


From: syncroinc@aol.com
Subject: Re: [church_and_change] Why Men Hate Going To Church
To: church_and_change@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, December 25, 2010, 10:16 AM



Awesome- thanks!

Dave Long
St Pauls Franklin
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Mark Salzwedel
Sender: church_and_change@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:11:40 -0800 (PST)
To:
ReplyTo: church_and_change@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [church_and_change] Why Men Hate Going To Church


Dave,

I'm not familiar with the book you are referring to, but here's a Lutheran discussion of the topic I can recommend that might offer some further food for thought.

http://issuesetc.org/podcast/Show18072308H1%201.mp3

- Mark






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "syncroinc@aol.com"
To: church_and_change@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, December 25, 2010 9:45:50 AM
Subject: [church_and_change] Why Men Hate Going To Church [2 Attachments]


Merry Christmas and God's grace be with you gents.

It's me again, the guy with the men's retreat looking for 20 WELS men ready to experience a true man's adventure and establish a core WELS team to get something going in our synod. I'd like to thank the man on this list who suggested the book "Why Men Hate Going To Church" by David Murrow. I got it as a gift last night and I'm halfway through it already. It's a great read and a wake-up call to action, it's the reason I'm doing what I'm doing and not going away.

The books states that 35% of men go to church weekly, in Europe more like 5%. Any WELS Pastor knows that we loose (sic) men ages 18-35 at an unacceptable rate, some right after confirmation, and most never come back. When I was on the board of elders at my church, loosing folks was a grave topic of concern, one which no one seemed to have a clue what to do about except keep track of numbers and write strongly worded letters before eventually purging these lost souls from our membership roster. It wasn't a very satisfying or productive job.

So this glorious morning as we celebrate our Savior's birth I am taking a moment to write to you again, re-energized and enthusiastic after reading this book about a project that I have been working on for most of my life. I want to invite you to join me to renew and supercharge men and bring them back to church and in service of the Word where they belong. I invite each of you again to think about joining me in a hands on discovery, one that has the potential to reinvigorate our drifting men folk, give them an opportunity to examine their faith and a chance to rejoin the church once again reclaiming their God-pleasing places as powerful leaders and joyful witnesses.

Questions and concerns can be sent to me off line. Logistically there's not a lot to do- register by sending in the form, then show up on Friday with a sleeping bag at 5:30 PM and leave Sunday at 3. We'll take care of the rest. I've attached the forms and some links for more data. If money is an issue please let me know and I'll take care of it.

Sincerely

Dave Long
St. Pauls Franklin WI

PS Thank you to the men who contacted me off line and shed some light on Andy and his rant from a few weeks ago. I have a better understanding of who he might be, especially the fact that he was NOT a pastor. I would love for us to find a way to help Andy sort things out and bring him some peace.




Past Participants Talk About "One Year To Live"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbKfEa3JF3c&feature=related


Wives of Participants Speak about "One Year To Live"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnNuRRmv3Xo

Lutheran Men in Mission including "One Year To Live"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCJzH5RbvJU

Chetek, Wisconsin
Luther Park Bible Camp
January 14-16, 2011
(near Eau Claire)

Revision of Justification by Faith Started

By Norma Boeckler. Jesus taught us to have a child-like faith,
not to goose-step behind someone whose authority rests on being a mediocre Greek student.


From the current draft:



Luther versus the UOJ Pietists:
Justification by Faith Alone



Gregory L. Jackson, PhD










Epiphany, 2011 Revision
Martin Chemnitz Press
Art, Copyright, Norma Boeckler, 2010
Text, Copyright, Gregory L. Jackson, 2010
ISBN #978-0-557-66008-7

Acknowledgements
Lutheran laity began this project by asking me to look into justification by faith and the UOJ controversy at a WELS congregation in Kokomo, Indiana. That research became an important part of Thy Strong Word, which is also available in print and as a free PDF download from Lulu.com. The need for additional study has been motivated by the spread of false doctrine among Lutherans, the abandonment of the Confessions and liturgical worship, and the hatred expressed toward justification by faith.
Many Lutheran pastors think they are conservatives because they convertly express their mild criticism of Church Growth, Emergent Church, and the New Age fantasies of Leonard Sweet. Nevertheless, they goose-step, with glazed eyes, to the beat of forgiveness without faith, universal absolution, justification without faith.

Introduction

Lutherans will find the following to be a familiar, erroneous definition of justification:
This is very conveniently expressed by the terms objective and subjective justification. Objective justification is the act of God, by which he proffers pardon to all through Christ; subjective, is the act of man, by which he accepts the pardon freely offered in the Gospel. The former is universal, the latter not.

This is not a quotation from Walther in 1847 or Pieper’s Christian Dogmatics in English in 1950. Nor is it from any work prior to the Age of Pietism. Instead, it is the translator’s note from a book of lectures published by a Halle University Pietist, Georg Christian Knapp. The date of the first English edition is 1831, eight years before Walther landed in America with the Stephanite migration. The translator, Leonard Woods, Junior, was the brilliant, young superstar of the mainline Protestants. His translation of Knapp was used throughout the 19th century, so the book influenced the conservative German Lutherans who read the original and the mainline Protestants who used the English translation in their schools.

The original German book began as lectures at Halle in the late 1700s, which were published in 1817. Halle University was established in 1691 to teach Pietism, a peculiar blend of Lutheran and Calvinistic doctrine. The Knapp book is still in print today, an indication of its formidable influence in German and English in the 19th century in America. That influence continues today, because universal absolution became the hallmark of mainline Protestantism, notably in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. Universal absolution is also the essence of Universal Objective Justification (UOJ), the only important doctrine for the old Synodical Conference – the Wisconsin Synod, the Evangelical Lutheran Synod, and the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod. UOJ is the reason why the WELS, the ELS, and the LCMS work together with ELCA – they share the same doctrine.

The Biblical doctrine of justification by faith has become toxic to the old Synodical Conference. The development of this turning away from sound doctrine can be documented in two ways. First of all, the historical context needs to be considered, because most people do not know what Pietism is, how American Lutheran church bodies began in Pietism rather than Lutheran orthodoxy. Secondly, the favorite passages of the UOJ advocates need careful examination, because their perversion of the truth requires twisting God’s Word.

Additional materials include the favorite quotations of UOJ advocates and why these sentiments are wrong. Justification by faith is naturally taught clearly before the Age of Pietism, so those quotations are also listed.

Research is being completed about the injection of Pietism into the nascent Synodical Conference. That work, by another author, will eventually be included in future editions of this volume. Additional essays are also going to be added, with permission from the author’s family.

St Stephen, the first martyr « Churchmouse Campanologist

St Stephen, the first martyr « Churchmouse Campanologist

Stephen means "crown" in Greek, so the New Testament references to a "crown of life" may be a way of honoring the first martyr.

Hef Seeking Suitable Venue To Marry His Child Bride



Trophy wife weddings are a specialty in WELS. The couple will be expected to fund a wide variety of projects, all doomed to failure, but handy for employing the flotsam and jetsam of the clergy.

If Hef has enough money left from previous marriage disasters, he can share the bounty with Missouri and the Little Sect on the Prairie. All three sects have shared "whales," the really big fish they have harpooned with absolution activated by highly visible giving.

UOJ is not good for planned giving. The whales need to feel the guilt first before they can enjoy the comfort of the post-teen bride.

Caution - the bride may return to Buddhism or Goth when Hef expires from an overdose of his medicine. Seriously, it has happened before.