Sunday, June 24, 2012

Jerry's Kids: From Penn State to the State Pen.
Institutional Cover-Ups in the SynConference and Catholicism:


Penn State
Most people realize that Penn State knew all about Defensive Coach Jerry Sandusky using his boys' charity to find, befriend, and rape boys. Penn State knew for at least 20 years. One account said that Sandusky still had an office in the athletic building until he was arrested. Here are some notables in the scandal, including a prosecutor who completely disappeared from the face of the earth. And so did his hard drive.

Many think Sandusky's predation was only part of a child prostitution ring. A similar one was broken up in New Haven, Connecticut, in 1973. The ring-leader was a Disciples of Christ staffer at their Ecumenical Continuing Education Center.

Where do the photos and videos come from, the ones that WELS staffer Joel Hochmuth was swapping with like-minded friends all over the Net? They come from boys being raped by predators like Sandusky.

Here is an article about Penn State's liability.


The cardinal sins before dying.
Bevilacqua shredded evidence of his priests' abuse of children.

Roman Catholics World-wide
The Church of Rome was known for moving predator priests around in 1987. The headlines began, but nothing much was done, except for punishing those who opposed it. The survivors began networking and putting together the facts. Enormous lawsuits were settled, and yet the same stories continue.

Clearly the Roman attitude is - a priest can do no wrong, and and a bishop is just plain infallible. Stories have erupted about Roman Catholic churches and institutions where children were preyed upon without ceasing. Any attempt to stop the criminal behavior is met with denial, silence. That continues to be Roman Catholic policy.

The Catholic bishops have engaged in some face-saving tactics, but the lawsuits and criminal trials continue. The latest to be convicted is a monsignor. The Very Reverend Monsignor Lynn was in charge of clergy appointments, so he was very much like a WELS or LCMS District Pope. His cardinal shredded incriminating documents, which is the policy of Missouri Synod District Popes. Some might call that felony obstruction of justice, but the prelates--whether Lutheran or Catholic--consider it good business.

When the Boston situation erupted, the man in charge of covering up for predatory priests, Cardinal Law, was promoted to Rome. Some say that vast numbers of clergy records are now stored in the Vatican, a sovereign state immune to subpoena from the US.

Father Maciel, Legion of Christ founder, never lost his popularity with Pope John Paul II, because his order was so lucrative in raking in the dough - $20 billion in assets. Maciel molested boys in the charity that he began (like Sandusky), fathered two children with one lady, and also abused one of his sons. He abused drugs, too.

Sandusky is preparing for a busman's holiday in prison.
Paterno met his Maker already.


SynConference Lutherans
The LCMS and WELS are as dishonest and abusive as the Roman Catholics, without the excuse of celibacy vows. Of course, the ELS follows behind, no different but statistically irrelevant.

When I made that point in Christian News, WELS SP Mark Schroeder immediately forced an apology from Herman Otten. The occasion was my review of Randy Engel's Rite of Sodomy, volume I, about Roman Catholic predators.

After the forced apology, the Joel Hochmuth scandal erupted, with the Director of Communications arrested by the FBI for file-swapping the most vile, disgusting graphics anyone could imagine. The Love Shack might well be compared to the Vatican during the reign of the Borgia popes.

SNAP said:


TMJ4 reports that Waukesha police arrested Joel Hochmuth, Director of Communications for the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, for reports of child pornography. The FBI cyber crime task force determined that child pornography was being downloaded by someone inside of Hochmuth’s residence.


Hochmuth is expected to appear in court today as Waukesha detectives continue to search the hard drives of his computers for additional evidence of child pornography.  We applaud the efforts of the FBI and the Waukesha Police Department in their efforts to keep our children safe.


The President of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, Mark Schroeder, told TMJ4 that “this is not in keeping with the Joel Hochmuth he knows.  And he is praying it is all some kind of misunderstanding”.


Although this sentiment may be understandable because the Synod President appears to be a friend and colleague of Hochmuth, it is important to keep in mind, as we are again learning from the recent developments at Penn State University, that those who prey on children are often respected members of the community.  Friends, neighbors, and colleagues often find it impossible to believe that someone they know and respect could be capable of causing harm to a child.  It is important to remember that most child predators are not lurking in the bushes; they are people who have often gained the trust and admiration of parents and their children.


If the charges against Hochmuth turn out to be credible it is important to know what steps the Synod President, Mark Schroeder, is going to implement to protect children.  Schroeder should immediately notify the congregations of the Synod of the charges that have been made against Hochmuth.  He should explain to his members and to the community how reports of sexual misconduct are handled by the Synod.  In addition Schroeder should reach out to his members and encourage them to report any suspicions they have of possible misconduct by Hochmuth to law enforcement officials.


Missouri Synod leaders encouraged Darwin Schauer - a known, convicted sex predator to enter its alternative (drive-by) pastor program and take a small parish, where he molested again. When the facts came out, SP Harrison ordered silence and its ovine pastors silenced themselves. The Steadfast Lutherans care more about Holy Mother Missouri than they do the children in their own denomination. Silence and forgetting makes it go away.

SNAP wrote:


SNAP blasts LCMS officials, calls for criminal investigation


POSTED BY BARBARA DORRIS ON APRIL 16, 2012 · FLAG
It is deplorable that Darwin Schauer was hired as a pastor when officials knew that he had abused children in the past. Charges of negligence should be brought against these officials for placing this predator in a situation where he easily could – and did – abuse another child. We hope that justice will be served for the newest victim of this predator. 


We applaud Rev. Don Kirchner for taking the fight to the LCMS church and district officials and getting to the truth of this situation. Yet Kirchner should not be acting alone; law enforcement officials should be investigating to see what laws, if any, were broken when these officials hired a known sex offender and put him around children. We hope that anyone – whether involved with the LCMS church or not – who may have any knowledge of Schauer’s crimes or the complicity of LCMS church and district officials (such as District President Don Fondow) to immediately report what they have seen, suspected, or suffered to police.


Read the story here: http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/234531/group/homepage/



Darwin Schauer is still in LCMS worker directory on 24 June 2012:


http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2012/06/monsignor-convicted-of-child.html 



Here are two articles about Schauer:


Schauer story: part 1 of 2

Schauer story: part 2 of 2:

Places mentioned in above article:


         from: Blackduck, MN to: Lake George, MN

David Scaer, Concordia Seminary, Ft.  Wayne

Paul Scaer, once a Missouri pastor, is  named in a lawsuit that was sent to me.
Paul has met his maker, too. He died of AIDS as an ELCA member.
---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Jerry's Kids: From Penn State to the State Pen.Ins...":

Lawyer in Minneapolis for rape victims of church leaders or people in power:
http://www.facebook.com/AndersonAdvocates

---


Third Sunday after Trinity.
Luke 15:1-10. Lost Sheep, Lost Coin





The Third Sunday after Trinity, 2012


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn # 652      I Lay My Sins on Jesus                   1.24
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual        
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed               p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #436    The Lord’s My Shepherd                1.33

You Are the Silver Coin

The Communion Hymn # 190      Christ Is Arisen         1:52
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 350      Jesus the Very Thought of Thee  1:53

KJV 1 Peter 5:6 Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you in due time: 7 Casting all your care upon him; for he careth for you. 8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour: 9 Whom resist stedfast in the faith, knowing that the same afflictions are accomplished in your brethren that are in the world. 10 But the God of all grace, who hath called us unto his eternal glory by Christ Jesus, after that ye have suffered a while, make you perfect, stablish, strengthen, settle you. 11 To him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

KJV Luke 15:1 Then drew near unto him all the publicans and sinners for to hear him. 2 And the Pharisees and scribes murmured, saying, This man receiveth sinners, and eateth with them. 3 And he spake this parable unto them, saying, 4 What man of you, having an hundred sheep, if he lose one of them, doth not leave the ninety and nine in the wilderness, and go after that which is lost, until he find it? 5 And when he hath found it, he layeth it on his shoulders, rejoicing. 6 And when he cometh home, he calleth together his friends and neighbours, saying unto them, Rejoice with me; for I have found my sheep which was lost. 7 I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance. 8 Either what woman having ten pieces of silver, if she lose one piece, doth not light a candle, and sweep the house, and seek diligently till she find it? 9 And when she hath found it, she calleth her friends and her neighbours together, saying, Rejoice with me; for I have found the piece which I had lost. 10 Likewise, I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth.

Third Sunday After Trinity

Lord God, heavenly Father, we all like sheep have gone astray, having suffered ourselves to be led away from the right path by Satan and our own sinful flesh: We beseech Thee graciously to forgive us all our sins for the sake of Thy Son, Jesus Christ; and quicken our hearts by Thy Holy Spirit, that we may abide in Thy word, and in true repentance and a steadfast faith continue in Thy Church unto the end, and obtain eternal salvation, through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end Amen.

First Luther Sermon on Luke 15:1ff

Second Luther Sermon on Luke 15:1ff.



You Are the Silver Coin

Lenski:
Luke again offers only enough information to indicate how Jesus was prompted to utter the following parables. The time, the place, and the other circumstances are immaterial. Once before, in 5:30, the same class of men raised the same objection. See 3:12 on the publicans [tax collectors]; the open transgressors were classed with them, being notorious sinners of various kinds in a society that was very different from ours, in which the Pharisaic, ostentatious type of holiness dominated the public and by contrast made men like these tax collectors, etc., practically outcasts.
One of the marked features of Jesus’ ministry was the attraction of these outcasts to him. The Pharisees and the scribes only scorned and damned them, but the holy Jesus had a way of salvation open for them, one that, indeed, condemned their sins in no uncertain terms but at the same time opened the divine way of remission for all sins. So they drew near to him in numbers (all) and did this continuously at the present time as the periphrastic imperfect states. They kept drinking in his words eagerly, therefore we have the durative present infinitive.
Lenski, R. C. H.: The Interpretation of St. Luke's Gospel. Minneapolis, MN : Augsburg Publishing House, 1961, S. 793.

This Gospel contains the teaching we hold and boast of as our chief doctrine, which is called the true Christian teaching, namely, the doctrine of grace and forgiveness of sins, and Christian liberty from the law. It is a very loving and friendly admonition to repentance and the knowledge of Christ. And it is ever a pity, that a godless, impudent person should be permitted to hear such an excellent, comforting and joyful sermon. And yet it is more sad, that every one graduates so soon in it and masters it so that he thinks he knows it so well that he can learn nothing more from it. Yet God, our Lord, does not permit himself to become vexed or weary in repeating it yearly, yea, every day, and enforces it as though he knew nothing else to preach, and as though he had no other skill or art. While we poor, wretched people immediately become so overlearned, so satisfied, tired of it and disgusted besides, that we have no longer a desire or love for it.

Jesus repeatedly told the crowds that He did not come to teach those who were already righteous or healthy in their own eyes, but those who were hungry for the medicine He had to offer.

We all know what that is like. When we are sick, with a burning throat, or another ailment, we do not ask about the weather for the trip to the doctor and pharmacy. We do not shop for a discount on the medicine. We want the treatment and the medicine as soon as possible, and we feel immediate relief.

One problem with antibiotics is that they work so fast that people forget to take the whole course of medicine and can end up worse off than before.

The religious are always separating themselves into two classes. They are the righteous ones, based on works, and cannot associate with the unclean. What was true of the Pharisees then is just as true of the Pietists now. The real issue is the same – how does one become forgiven, how to have the righteousness of God, the peace that passes all understanding?

KJV Luke 15:1 Then drew near unto him all the publicans and sinners for to hear him. 2 And the Pharisees and scribes murmured, saying, This man receiveth sinners, and eateth with them.

Verse 1 reveals the great crime of Jesus. The tax collectors and the open sinners clamored to hear Him. They were attracted to His gracious manner and His willingness to be with them. Looking around, they did not see the gratuitous sneer, the monkey face that told them they were the unclean beast in the midst of the holy ones. Everyone seemed to be in the same situation.

An open sinner was someone whose carnal sins were so obvious that no one questioned it. That might include a life of crime, drunkenness, immorality, and so forth. Those whose sins are on the inside like to look down on those who are open and obvious sinners.

The tax collectors were easy to hate, because they extorted tax money to pay for the occupation forces from the despised Roman Empire. It was bad enough to have powerful soldiers enforcing the law, but to think that the citizens paid for the privilege – that was too much. Because of the system of tax farming, as it was called later in Europe, the tax collector did better if he forced more money out of the Jewish people. We no longer have that. Instead we have tax agents who get promotions for getting a better yield from those they audit.

Jesus knew what the Pharisees and scribes thought about this. The murmuring is not for His benefit but for ours. Doubtless the eager throngs felt the disapproval and saw the religious leaders muttering to one another. “He welcomes sinners! He sits down to eat dinner with them!”

Shunning is an effective way to control people who do not think for themselves. In academic life, the wrong thought expressed in the open can eliminate promotions and tenure. In politics, people refuse to be leaders, for fear of the organized campaign of hatred sure to follow.

Church leaders have harnessed the power of the Pharisee. Few dare to agree with the dissenter or to be seen with that person. I had lunch with a friend at a WELS convention years ago. He said later, “You made me the most popular person here.?” I asked how. He said, “Everyone is coming up to me, saying – how do you know him?” It was not meant to be a friendly question. I have had people make a point of not seeing me, making a face at me, even glaring across a large auditorium at me.

Anyone who thinks that forgiveness comes from conformity in this world is blind to Paul’s admonition – Do not be conformed to this world but be transformed by the renewal of your mind.

Jesus knew the mindset of the Pharisee, which is a natural outgrowth of seeing righteousness as based on works. That was not true Judaism, but it was the spirit of the times, which made others all the more hungry and thirsty for true righteousness.

If you think that was aimed at the Pharisees and the Jews alone, you must think they are sitting around reading the Gospel lessons. This parable is aimed at the Pharisee in all of us and also aimed at those who feel the grip and terror of their sins.

3 And he spake this parable unto them, saying, 4 What man of you, having an hundred sheep, if he lose one of them, doth not leave the ninety and nine in the wilderness, and go after that which is lost, until he find it?

These parables are so compelling that no one can disagree with their factual foundation. However, the problem remains in interpreting them. As Luther said, we grow tired of the Gospel and no longer pay attention to its wisdom. Worst of all, people recite this and then act as if the opposite were true. For instance, their definition of “open transgressor” is one who is known to disagree with the synod or the pastor. Excommunicate! – and they do. But they turn around and absolve the unrepentant abuser because it is good for public relations.

We enjoy having shepherding dogs, because their software tells them to protect us and care for us. All three gather at the front door and bark away the delivery man, who is there to harm us, according to their barks. When Precious, the Shetland Sheepdog, ran away from me and lost herself, I asked Sassy Sue to find her. I opened the back door, and said to Sassy, “Find Precious.” Sassy ran to the spot where Precious was and guided her to the front door.

When Precious was lost, I immediately wanted to find her. That was the only thing on my mind. We have all kinds of critters in the woods behind our house, and she is older and more fragile. When an animal is lost, we do not worry about the ones still safe, saying, “Most of them are fine.”  We go help the lost one.

Jesus question can only be answered one way, even among the most hardened. Any person, any Pharisee would go find the sheep – and not rest until it was found. Jesus is clearly saying, “This is God’s work, to rescue the lost, not to praise the secure and satisfied.”

5 And when he hath found it, he layeth it on his shoulders, rejoicing. 6 And when he cometh home, he calleth together his friends and neighbours, saying unto them, Rejoice with me; for I have found my sheep which was lost.

Here are several actions that identify God’s attitude toward the forgiven sinner. The lost animal wants to be found soon enough. It is helpless and more needy by the moment. Little Precious has the agility and speed to escape my grasp. When the three of us reached the front door, Precious looked around for an escape route, because she imagined she was in trouble with me. She sat down instead, content to trust me to take her inside.

The parable shows the basics of God’s actions. He pursues the lost, frightened, weak one. God comes to us with the Gospel. He makes sure that we hear the Word of God, that we have teachers and preachers. If we drive them out and starve them, that is our problem, one we have created for ourselves. That is the situation today, when few can find a traditional Lutheran worship service where the historic creeds, liturgy, hymns, and sermon emphasize the Means of Grace.

That loss was not God’s doing but man’s. I have watched it happen for 40 years while the clergy did nothing. In fact, the Lutherans have been far weaker in saying anything than the Calvinists, who are disgusted with this turn of events.

First of all, the shepherd rejoices at finding the lost sheep. The self-righteous walk by on the other side, sneering at the person who is lost in sin.

Secondly, he places the weakened sheep on His shoulders. This represents how God carries the weakened sinner back to a place of healing. Once again, this is God’s act. The sheep resting on the shoulders reminds us of faith.

Like sheep, we are both dumb and stubborn. We get ourselves into trouble that way. When we recognize the voice of the Good Shepherd we trust in His goodness and relax in His care.

Thirdly, he invites his friends and neighbors to rejoice with him, declaring my lost sheep has been found.

This shows the divine grace of our Savior, because we as humans are likely to denounce the sinner for being lost and scold him no end for getting himself into trouble. One girl from a Fundamentalist sect got drunk all the time, because it was one way to drive her parents crazy. They scolded her no end. One night she came home and passed out on the floor, in a pool of her own vomit. Her parents took care of her, cleaned her up, and did not say a word. She woke up clean in fresh clothes in her bed. She said, “That is when I realized my parents really loved me.” Of course they loved her when they scolded her, but she did not want to see the love. The last act opened her eyes.

People often look at God that way. They see every negative experience as God’s condemnation, perhaps because they only think in terms of the Law, even when rebelling against the Law. In questioning God’s goodness they fail to see the goodness, the grace freely offered and the constant help always there.

The last verse is a pointed barb against the self-righteous –
7 I say unto you, that likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no repentance.

The false concept is – God must be happy with me because I am so good, and I wish everyone could be just like me. Jesus corrects this by saying that the rejoicing over a lost sinner repenting  is greater than those 99 who need no repentance.

Left unsaid but clear to everyone is this – we all need repentance. If we think otherwise, we are righteous only in our own eyes.

Repentance does not mean – change your ways. In the New Testament it means sorrow for sin and faith in the Gospel. From forgiveness comes the power to fight against temptation. Man by himself is unable to do it. The Christian’s life is one of contrition for sin and faith in the Gospel promise of forgiveness.

The silver coin

8 Either what woman having ten pieces of silver, if she lose one piece, doth not light a candle, and sweep the house, and seek diligently till she find it?

One thing we have in common is losing something. And we search for it everywhere. I needed my birth certificate so I went through hundreds of photos and old documents looking for it.

This part of the lesson is so important that the person who knows it, remembers it, and applies it will have the Gospel in a few words. Why did Jesus switch genders and make the main person a woman? This is the art of the divine parable. Men identify with the shepherd, women with the lost coin.

There are three actions:
1.    Light a candle.
2.    Sweep the whole house.
3.    Seek diligently until the coin is found.

Have you crawled under the bed with a flashlight? Have you cleaned the entire house to find one thing? Have you kept looking until you found the lost object?

This shows the nature of God, to do everything possible to reclaim us. Luther – as always – put the lesson in a few word – You are the lost coin in His hand.

You are that unique soul so precious to God that He must grasp you again when you are slipping away. One college student said, “I took my lessons for granted until I was taught by people who hated God’s Word. Then I realized how easily faith was stolen away.”
I see all these remedies for self-esteem, but they do not include the Gospel. The Gospel says, “You are that silver coin in God’s hand.” Have you wandered away or run away. He has lit a candle to find you in the darkness, so you see His light again. He is sweeping the house in search of you. He may use your friends or families or co-workers to reclaim you. He may use the most obnoxious person you know to say the right thing at the right moment. If you are still distant, rebellious or indifferent, He will search until you are in His grasp again.

9 And when she hath found it, she calleth her friends and her neighbours together, saying, Rejoice with me; for I have found the piece which I had lost. 10 Likewise, I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth.

And when you are found, God does not scold but rejoices. The angels of God do not scold but rejoice.


21. Therefore, when you feel your sins gnawing at you, and feel your heart trembling and agitated, place yourself beside the publicans where they are standing. These are the very ones who shall receive the Gospel. Do so joyously, and say: “Oh, God! it is thy word that says there shall be joy in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over ninety and nine righteous persons, who need no repentance, and that all the righteous and angels are to interpose and cover up sins. Now, Oh, God! I have come to this that I feel my sins. I am already judged. I need but the one Shepherd who seeketh me; and I will therefore freely venture on thy Gospel.”

22. It is thus that you come to God. You are already the sheep placed upon his shoulders. You have found the Shepherd. You are the piece of silver in the hand. You are the one over whom is joy in heaven in the presence of all the angels. We are not to worry, if we do not experience or feel this at once. Sin will daily decrease, and its sting will drive you to seek God. You must struggle against this feeling by faith, and say: “Oh, God! I know thou hast said this, and I lean upon thy Word. I am the sheep and the piece of silver; thou the shepherd and the woman.”





---


churchmousec (http://churchmousec.wordpress.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Third Sunday after Trinity. Luke 15:1-10. Lost She...":

Thank you, Dr Jackson, for this commentary, which is highly appropriate for our times.

Never in my life have I seen so many exalting themselves above others, which also serves as a mirror for my own sins of self-righteousness.

Churchmouse 

Saturday, June 23, 2012

VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - CONNECTICUT:Supreme Court refuses to hear Bishop Seabury Anglican Church Dispute.
Harrison and the Minnesota Pope Knew They Could Get Away with It

The odd couple rejoices in their pope-king rights.


VirtueOnline - News - Exclusives - CONNECTICUT:Supreme Court refuses to hear Bishop Seabury Anglican Church Dispute:


The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decided on Monday not to hear the property case of Bishop Seabury Anglican Church vs. The Episcopal Church/Diocese of Connecticut.

Less than four of the Supreme Court's Justices were interested in reviewing the two petitions from parishes that lost their properties in state Supreme Court decisions. It takes a vote of at least four Justices to grant review. The two cases (the Timberridge case from Georgia, No. 11-1101, and the Bishop Seabury case from Connecticut, No. 11-1139) are shown as having review denied, said Canon lawyer Alan S. Haley.

Fr. Ron Gauss, Senior Associate rector of the church said it was strange insofar that according to SCOTUS, there is plenty of room on the docket since they are running short to fill of their OCT-DEC calendar.

"One observer noted that not one of the Justices wanted to venture into the area of Church/State, and just leave the muddled mess to the States. Eventually - somewhere down the road, the Court will have to decide. I can't visualize anyone with a sound mind would ever want to donate to the Episcopal Church in Connecticut to build or establish a congregation. Even with a Deed or a quit claim deed, the Court would ignore it", Gauss wrote in an e-mail to VOL.

"Bishop Seabury Anglican Church gives thanks to God, and all who have stuck it out with us throughout the battle. Many have left with all kinds of excuses and many have stayed with strength, and prayer. We are now preparing to enter into a new phase of our life as a congregation."

Gauss noted that the Bishop of Connecticut, Ian Douglas made several offers to the congregation, but they all revolved around the departure of the Senior Associate, the Venerable Ronald S. Gauss. (The parish voted some years ago to make Jesus the Rector of the Parish.)

"Our congregation is given the option now of leaving the building, returning to the Episcopal Church with DEPO (Delegated Episcopal Pastoral Oversight), returning to the Episcopal Church, becoming another denomination (Leaving CANA/ACNA), or becoming Roman Catholic. We are staying put in CANA. "We give God praise and glory in all situations knowing that God knows far better what is needed for this parish than we can ever understand or fathom," said Gauss.

"The result today for church property law is regrettable, because it means that the morass of State court decisions interpreting Jones v. Wolf, 443 U.S. 595 (1979) will remain unresolved, with some States allowing certain churches to bypass their legal requirements for the creation of a trust, and with other States requiring that all churches comply with their local trust laws. Thus the outcome of any church-parish dispute over property will continue to turn upon the State in which it arises: if the parish is in California, Connecticut, Georgia, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York or Ohio, it will most likely lose its property; but if it is in Alaska, Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, New Hampshire or South Carolina, it will most likely keep its property. And if it is in Kentucky or Pennsylvania or Virginia, then the courts could hold that any national trust canon is ineffective to create a trust, but still find that a trust existed anyway," wrote Haley.

"Fortunately, the denial of review will have little or no bearing on the three pending property lawsuits involving entire dioceses which left the Church (Quincy, Fort Worth and San Joaquin). That is because the Church's Dennis Canon has no application to real or personal property owned by dioceses. Furthermore, the fact that the Supreme Court declines to review a lower court's decision is not a judgment on the merits -- it does not mean that the Court views that case as having been correctly decided. Its net effect, therefore, will be to leave the various States' results exactly as they are.

"The interesting fact is that we have never before had a Supreme Court on which there were no members of Protestant denominations. The current Court is made up of six Roman Catholics (Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Sotomayor) and three Jews (Ginsburg, Breyer and Kagan). Whether that is what determined that there were not enough justices interested in the property disputes of Protestant churches is something we shall probably never know. Also, none of the justices who served on the Court in 1979, when they issued the Jones decision, is still on the bench today, so any institutional history that attended that case has been lost."

Episcopal Bishop of Connecticut Ian T. Douglas expressed satisfaction with the decision. "This has been a long and difficult process that has taken away from our common witness to the Good News of God in our Savior Jesus Christ. With the decision of The Supreme Court we can now put this matter behind us and once again turn our full attention to the work of proclaiming and making real God's mission of restoration and reconciliation in all the world."

"Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court declined to review the Connecticut Supreme Court's decision that the property of Bishop Seabury Episcopal Church was held in trust for the Episcopal Diocese of Connecticut and The Episcopal Church in the United States and that former parishioners of the parish could not take that property with them to another church. This ruling brings the litigation over the property to its final conclusion: the judgment entered in favor of the Parish, the Diocese and The Episcopal Church is now fully enforceable. "Now that the high-court has refused their petition, Bishop Douglas anticipates working through the options with the group."

*****
HARTFORD, CT: Episcopal Diocese Wooing Breakaway Groton Church Back Into The Fold
U.S. Supreme Court Declined To Consider Fight Over Bishop Seabury Church Property

By WES DUPLANTIER
The Hartford Courant
http://www.courant.com/community/groton/hc-groton-episcopal-church-0621-20120620,0,3082343.story
June 20, 2012

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision this week not to hear the case of a conservative Episocopal parish in Groton that split from the larger church, Connecticut's Episcopal bishop said Wednesday that the diocese is trying to reconcile with the breakaway congregation. The high court said Monday that it would not hear arguments about whether the Bishop Seabury Church in Groton should have to return property to the Episcopal diocese, which it left in 2007. The state Supreme Court ruled last year that the 136-year-old parish had to return the property - the 6.5-acre church site, the sanctuary and its contents.

Bishop Seabury Church was one of six parishes in Connecticut that split from the Episcopal Church of the United States after it ordained an openly gay bishop in New Hampshire in 2003 and elected a woman as presiding bishop in 2006.

Bishop Ian T. Douglas of the Connecticut Diocese said Wednesday that of the five other parishes in the state that broke from the church, two have closed down, two have rejoined the church under his supervision and another is negotiating its return under supervision.

"The rate of parishes leaving has been in decline," Douglas said. "If anything it's been just the opposite, parishes seeking to have reconciled relationships."

The Episcopal Church has more than 170 parishes in Connecticut.

Douglas said he is now starting talks with the leader of the Groton congregation, Father Ronald Gauss, about five options the parish has for returning to the church.

Those options could allow the parish to be overseen by Douglas or another bishop within the Episcopal Church. The Groton parishioners also could become part of the Catholic Church but still be affiliated with The Episcopal Church and then rent their current building from the Episcopal diocese.

The Groton parish could even incorporate as a congregation separate from the Episcopal Church, but Douglas said renting buildings to groups that do that has been "generally discouraged" across the church, meaning Seabury would likely have to move from its current premises.

Or, Douglas said, the Groton parishoners could simply leave The Episcopal Church and worship elsewhere.

But he said the diocese would not object to having a parish that disagrees with some of its policies, such as ordaining homosexual bishops, if its members hold the same core Christian beliefs.

"We do not all march to the exact same tone in the way that we subscribe to our faith, yet we all would subscribe to the same creedal foundations of the faith," Douglas said.

Gauss said scenarios that allow his 250-member congregation to rejoin the church could require him to leave the parish, a statement with which Douglas agreed.

That's because Gauss was deposed - stripped of his standing in The Episcopal Church of the U.S. - after his parish broke away. Seabury is currently affiliated with the Anglican Church of Nigeria.

Gauss said five other area churches have offered his parish space if the congregation is forced to leave its building at 256 North Road in Groton. One neighboring church also has offered Seabury money if the parish needs financial support, he said.

Whatever Seabury decides to do, Gauss said, the decision would not be determined solely by one-on-one talks between him and Douglas. He said he would make the decision with his parishioners, just as he did when Seabury left the church five years ago.

"We're a church where all choices are made through the members," Gauss said.

END


We bow before you, Your Holiness.


'via Blog this'

UOJ and Worship - WELS Against the Means of Grace.
That Explains Their Church Shrinkage Lust



Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Chemnitz Provokes Comments":

Bivens showed himself to be opposed to Christ and His chief doctrine of one Justification solely by Faith Alone in his 1996 (W)ELS essay.

“The truth of justification, above all others, distinguishes Christianity from all other religions. If this teaching were obscured or lost, attempts to show significant differences between the Christian religion and others would ultimately prove to be futile. Also, as revealed and emphasized in the Bible, all other doctrines either prepare for or flow from this chief article of faith. Without this truth, all others would mean little. This doctrine is the source or basis of the benefits and blessings which mankind receives from God. What precisely is this “master and prince, lord, ruler and judge” over other doctrines? Justification is a declaratory act of God, in which he pronounces sinners righteous. As revealed in the Bible, this declaration of God is made totally by grace and on account of Jesus Christ and his substitutionary life and death on behalf of mankind. To phrase it somewhat differently, God has justified acquitted or declared righteous the whole world of sinners. He has forgiven them. They have been reconciled to God; their status in his eyes has been changed from that of sinner to forgiven sinner for the sake of Jesus Christ. Since all this applies to all people, the term universal or general justification is used. In our circles an alternate term, objective justification, is also used. If justification is universal, it must also be objective - sinners are forgiven whether they believe it or not.”

http://www.wlsessays.net/files/BivensPrimary.pdf 

***

GJ - If a few WELS essays are compared, it can be easily seen that they chant the same note all the time - the Chief Article is the forgiveness of every single atheist, polytheist, head-hunter, and pagan. They take pride in saying that, contrary to the Scriptures, contrary to the Book of Concord. But they say they are Scriptural and Confessional. Clearly one must bow to this heathen dogma to be someone in WELS.

---



AC V has left a new comment on your post "WELS UOJ - Johnny One-Note. They Must Have 50 Essa...":

Biven's essay was presented at the very first and foundational WELS National Worship Conference. You want to know what WELS worship is all about? Read the essay, and nota bene, there's not a word about the sacraments. Imagine that! The "primary doctrine" (UOJ) in the "primary setting" (liturgical worship because we have to; whoopee worship because its popular) has little need for the sacraments!

"The Primary Doctrine in Its Primary Setting: Objective Justification and Lutheran Worship"

[Prepared for the WELS National Conference on Worship, Music and the Arts Carthage College, ELCA, Kenosha, Wisconsin, July 23, 1996.

http://www.wlsessays.net/files/BivensPrimary.pdf 




WELS UOJ - Johnny One-Note.
They Must Have 50 Essays Saying the Same Thing



Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Chemnitz Provokes Comments":

Bivens showed himself to be opposed to Christ and His chief doctrine of one Justification solely by Faith Alone in his 1996 (W)ELS essay.

“The truth of justification, above all others, distinguishes Christianity from all other religions. If this teaching were obscured or lost, attempts to show significant differences between the Christian religion and others would ultimately prove to be futile. Also, as revealed and emphasized in the Bible, all other doctrines either prepare for or flow from this chief article of faith. Without this truth, all others would mean little. This doctrine is the source or basis of the benefits and blessings which mankind receives from God. What precisely is this “master and prince, lord, ruler and judge” over other doctrines? Justification is a declaratory act of God, in which he pronounces sinners righteous. As revealed in the Bible, this declaration of God is made totally by grace and on account of Jesus Christ and his substitutionary life and death on behalf of mankind. 


To phrase it somewhat differently, God has justified acquitted or declared righteous the whole world of sinners. He has forgiven them. They have been reconciled to God; their status in his eyes has been changed from that of sinner to forgiven sinner for the sake of Jesus Christ. Since all this applies to all people, the term universal or general justification is used. In our circles an alternate term, objective justification, is also used. If justification is universal, it must also be objective - sinners are forgiven whether they believe it or not.”

http://www.wlsessays.net/files/BivensPrimary.pdf 

***

GJ - Jay Webber loves to claim that his Marquart flavor of UOJ is superior to the WELS Kokomo flavor, but both versions teach forgiveness without faith, universal absolution, grace without the Means of Grace.


Shocking Expose - Team Jackson Listened to a Real PhD, Martin Marty




I took this photo after the endowed lectures that Martin Marty gave at Notre Dame, about 1983. Marty (not LI) was kind enough to endorse my dissertation for publication.

The Fox Valley plagiarists would jump all over this, except for one little fact. Marty also lectured at Wisconsin Lutheran College, even though the Michigan District of WELS passed a resolution opposing it. Not only that, but Thrivent/AAL/LB paid him to lecture WELS-ELCA-LCMS in Orlando, Florida.

It works this way - if WELS does it, there is nothing wrong. Before that, they may publish against it. But once they participate, their drones at the Love Shack make up a reason to support it with Enthusiasm.

I was digging around in our hope chest, looking for my birth certificate. I found a lot of great photographs instead. Some made me pause, as I looked at the transition of my mother from college co-ed in 1930 to white-haired great-grandmother holding Josie.

The photos of our sainted daughters made me a little sad and very nostalgic, but I also saw them adoring their brother and being adored.

Strict and Particular: I See Adulterous People: Mark Driscoll and the Dangers of Supposed Revelations



Strict and Particular: I See Adulterous People: Mark Driscoll and the Dangers of Supposed Revelations:


FRIDAY, JUNE 22, 2012

I See Adulterous People: Mark Driscoll and the Dangers of Supposed Revelations
Mark Driscoll, senior pastor of Mars Hill Church in Seattle, Washington State, is an odd figure. Originally identified with the Emergent Church movement, he distanced himself from that group a few years ago when it became clear that Brian McLaren, Rob Bell and others were leading the way into a new phase of Protestant liberalism and away from historic Evangelicalism. At the same time Driscoll began to identify himself as a Calvinist, one of the so-called "New Calvinists". Many saw this as a promising sign; while we found Driscoll's use of profanity in the pulpit offputting (and let's be honest, what is the point of that? It's to shock, it's to provoke a reaction), we recognised, and still recognise, that people mature and change. His affirmation of Calvinism was a step in the right direction.

Recently, however, a number of things have happened to cause deep concern for Driscoll. First of all, Mars Hill has become a multi-site megachurch. The idea of the Multisite is that in addition to the main location, you have a number of satellite campuses where the sermon from the main location is beamed in on big screens. This amazes me, because the Emergent Church began as a protest against the inauthenticity of the big-box megachurches, and an affirmation of community. Now, I can imagine few things as inauthentic as a church meeting where the sermon is beamed in rather than being live. Ironically, the musical portion of the service is live at these locations, perhaps a telling point. We put this down to an inadequate doctrine of the Church, recommend that Driscoll read P.T. Forsyth's The Church and the Sacraments and move on.


'via Blog this'

Driscoll must have been getting help from Packer on the Calvinist ESV,
which Paul McCain loves so dearly.

David Becker Joins the Chorus Against the NNIV.
Sets Record in Blog Self-Promotion

David Becker has heard of the Holman and likes it.


David Becker has left a new comment on your post "ELCA Pastor/Author Says Adam and Eve Were Not Real...":

Hi Pastor Jackson, since I have noticed that you have from time to time commented on Bible translation issues, I thought I’d let you know that, for what it’s worth, I have put out my own blog on the subject – http://welsbibletranslationissues.wordpress.com.

My most recent post was published today - http://welsbibletranslationissues.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/good-thing-martin-luther-didnt-have-to-deal-with-a-reformation-feasibility-committee/

Did you have an Ichabod feasibility committee when you started Ichabod?

Anyone, including you, may submit a comment. Feel free to submit comments in favor of the KJV, if you wish. You’ll notice that I favorably promoted the Holman Christian Standard Bible, which you said that nobody has heard of. Even though only 1.7% of the recent WELS convention delegates voted in favor of the HCSB, I would still strongly advocate for the HCSB if one HAS to choose among the NIV 2011, ESV and HCSB. Like you, I am adamantly opposed to the NIV 2011.

If you choose to print this comment and if others for the first time find out about http://welsbibletranslationissues.wordpress.com through Ichabod, nobody has to say on http://welsbibletranslationissues.wordpress.com where they found out about it.

It can be our little secret.

Perhaps you will want to put out a humorous “Shhh! Don’t say you read it on Ichabod” graphic. You are very good at that!

Anyway, that’s all for now – have a blessed day.

To God alone the glory!
Sincerely yours in Christ,
David Becker

***

GJ - I am in favor of open discussion of Lutheran topics, not just with people who agree with me.

Lizard-Hands Murdoch is in deep trouble for criminal spying on celebrities
and government leaders.
His corporation owns the NIV.
---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "David Becker Joins the Chorus Against the NNIV. Se...":

Ichabod -

Thank you for posting David Becker's contribution. [He expresses himself, well!] Sometime ago I visited his site and found it very favorably informative. I'm always happy to see brave souls express themselves in cyberspace. That's the new wave of communication these days.

And, I can understand Mr. Becker's selected choice of Bible translation as he said that if it is a choice of the new NIV 11 and the ESV, he opts for the Holman version.

Thanks David - for joining the anti Murdoch chorus!

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org

www.moralmatters.org

P.S. Ichabod - Nice pic of Murdoch. I’m elated that you caught a live pic of him before his mortician’s needle finished him off......

The Even More Confessional Than Ever Before SynConference Leaders Sign Letter with Papists, Muslims, Whatever


Here is the letter, which the three rascals above have published and bragged about.

I could write my own letter and publish it at the last minute, after the issue has been decided (but not made known).

I have no idea why such posturing matters - when Muslim, Pentecostal, and Roman Catholic names are added.


Leith Anderson
President
National Association of Evangelicals

Gary M. Benedict
President
The Christian and Missionary Alliance

Bishop John F. Bradosky
North American Lutheran Church

The Most Rev. Robert J. Carlson
Archbishop of St. Louis

Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan
Archbishop of New York
President
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

Mother Agnes Mary Donovan, S.V.
Superior General of the Sisters of Life

Sister Barbara Anne Gooding, R.S.M.
Director, Department of Religion
Saint Francis Health System

Sister Margaret Regina Halloran, l.s.p.
Provincial Superior, Brooklyn Province
Little Sisters of the Poor

The Rev. Dr. Matthew C. Harrison
President
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

U.S. Bishop Harry R. Jackson Jr.
Senior Pastor, Hope Christian Church
Bishop, Fellowship of International Churches

The Very Rev. Dr. John A. Jillions
Chancellor
Orthodox Church in America

The Most Blessed Jonah
Archbishop of Washington
Metropolitan of All American and Canada
Orthodox Church in America

Imam Faizul R. Khan
Founder and Leader
Islamic Society of Washington Area

The Very Rev. Leonid Kishkovsky
Director of External Affairs and Interchurch Relations
Orthodox Church in America

The Most Rev. William E. Lori
Archbishop of Baltimore
Chairman
USCCB Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty

Sister Maria Christine Lynch, l.s.p.
Provincial Superior, Chicago Province
Little Sisters of the Poor

Sister Loraine Marie Maguire, l.s.p.
Provincial Superior, Baltimore
Province Little Sisters of the Poor

The Rev. John A. Moldstad
President
Evangelical Lutheran Synod
Deaconess Cheryl D. Naumann
President Concordia Deaconess Conference
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

The Rev. Samuel Rodriguez
President
NHCLC
Hispanic Evangelical Association

Sister Joseph Marie Ruessmann, R.S.M., J.D., J.C.D., M.B.A.
Generalate Secretary
Religious Sisters of Mercy of Alma, Michigan

The Rev. Mark Schroeder
President
Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod

L. Roy Taylor
Stated Clerk of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in America

Sister Constance Carolyn Veit, l.s.p.
Communications Director
Little Sisters of the Poor

Dr. George O. Wood
General Superintendent
The General Council of the Assemblies of God

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "The Even More Confessional Than Ever Before SynCon...":

Even if the government mandate is overturned, it was effective in that it provided an opportunity for the ecumenists to bind themselves together in support of a "common enemy" while the duped laity cheer them on.

---

Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel has left a new comment on your post "The Even More Confessional Than Ever Before SynCon...":

Ichabod -

Yes, I agree with your assessment. Your thoughts were mine when I received from our local church the synodical email (yesterday) saying that Johnny come lately WELS, signed on [basically] after the SCOTUS decision has already been made, but not yet been made public. It was nice fence sitting timing on WELS part.

Also, as a side note, this WELS Johnny come lately sign on and synodical notification of such, reminded me of your recent Ichabod posting about the LCMS SP Harrison's "Blizzard of Sin" letter. [I just can't get that "blizzard of sin" description out of my head]

Nathan M. Bickel

www.thechristianmessage.org
www.moralmatters.org

ELCA Pastor/Author Says Adam and Eve Were Not Real, They Were Just a Metaphor - Exposing the ELCA.
Hey Martha, That Sounds Like the WELS NNIV



ELCA Pastor/Author Says Adam and Eve Were Not Real, They Were Just a Metaphor - Exposing the ELCA:



ELCA Pastor/Author Says Adam and Eve Were Not Real, They Were Just a Metaphor
05/30/20121 Comment

It amazes me that so many ELCA pastors reject God’s historic account of how He made the world.  (see previous report here)  We see it again, just this last week printed in The Seattle Times newspaper.  ELCA pastor, Ronald Moe-Lobeda (University Lutheran Church, Seattle, WA) wrote a letter to the editor proudly proclaiming his and his synod’s support for homosexual marriage.  Moe-Lobeda declares:

“One of the strongest biblical arguments in favor of marriage between a man and a woman has been that traditional interpretation of the Adam and Eve story in Genesis 2. However, I recently have concluded that the names of Eve and Adam are simply metaphors for Israel and Judah and have nothing to do with being real people, let alone personifications of all women and men,” (see here) Then Rev. Moe-Lobeda points the readers to his book on the subject, “The Mystery of Eve and Adam.”

I looked up Rev. Moe-Lobeda’s book, and this is what the book’s description tells us:

“What if the story of Eve and Adam was not meant to be a story about creation and the origin of life? What if Eve and Adam were not personifications of all women and men? What if the curse on the woman had nothing to do with the physical pain of giving birth? What if working by the sweat of the brow was a description of the slavery that existed under the monarchy? What if being cast out of the garden of Eden was a metaphor for the deportation of people from Judah to Babylon?

The author of this book takes readers on a journey of inquiry leading to the conclusion that the story of Eve and Adam was authored by the theological school of Jeremiah in order to dissuade the Judean people never to reinstate the monarchy after their return from Babylon—a monarchy that previously was responsible for so much infant mortality, subjugation of women, and enslavement of its own people. At the heart of this journey is the discovery that Eve and Adam actually are metaphors for Israel and Judah—two nations that chose to have a king like other nations and suffered the consequences.” (see here)

This kind of teaching reminds me of God’s word that says, “But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them —bringing swift destruction on themselves.  Many will follow their depraved conduct and will bring the way of truth into disrepute.  In their greed these teachers will exploit you with fabricated stories. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.” - 2 Peter 2:1-3


'via Blog this'

Dr. Moo wants to sell his NNIV Bible, one denomination at a time.

---



 New NIV
Cain and Abel
Genesis 4:1

4 Adam[a] made love to his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said, “With the help of the Lord I have brought forth[c] a man.”

Footnotes:
[a] Genesis 4:1 Or The man


Adam - the man - means Adam was symbolic, a myth.

The NNIV is dumbed down to the average IQ of a seminary president.

Former Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky convicted of child sex abuse | Fox News.
From Penn State to the State Pen

Holy Mother Penn State University protected him for decades.
Who disciplined DP Ed Werner? Not WELS.
Did Tabor (WELS) ever go to prison?
How many months was Al Just (WELS) in prison?
Joel Hochmuth (WELS) got ONE YEAR, with work release!


Former Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky convicted of child sex abuse | Fox News:


Former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky was convicted Friday of sexually assaulting 10 boys over 15 years, a scandal that shook the storied football program to its core and caused the university to fire legendary football coach Joe Paterno.

65-year-old Sandusky was led from the courtroom is handcuffs after being found guilty of 45 of 48 counts. He faces the possibility of life in prison.

Sandusky showed little emotion as the verdict was read. The judge ordered him to be taken to the county jail to await sentencing in about three months, and he was led from the courthouse in handcuffs as bystanders hurled insults at him. One yelled at him to "rot in hell," to which Sandusky shook his head.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/06/22/sandusky-jury-has-reached-verdict/#ixzz1ybuqP7IK


'via Blog this'

Friday, June 22, 2012

Monsignor convicted of child endangerment in priest abuse coverup - latimes.com.
Pennsylvania: Roman Catholic + Sandusky + the LCMS Lawsuit

Monsignor William Lynn

Monsignor convicted of child endangerment in priest abuse coverup - latimes.com:

A Pennsylvania jury Friday convicted Msgr. William J. Lynn of child endangerment for covering up sexual abuse of children by priests, but found the former Philadelphia archdiocese official not guilty of conspiracy and another endangerment charge.

'via Blog this'

***

Episcopal Bishop Charles Bennison



GJ - Add the Episcopals to this. Bennison got off - like most bishops and DPs - on a technicality.

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/08/07/episcopal-bishop-reinstated-despite-sex-abuse-failure/

Chemnitz Provokes Comments



 AC V has left a new comment on your post "Intrepid Lutherans: Chemnitz's Absolution for only...":

Brian G. Heyer, the author of the post asks: "How would — if at all — such an Absolution sting our ears in our modern WELS pews?"

Not sure about the stinging, but this is still ringing in their ears from the April 2012 issue of the WELS Forward in Christ:

"Especially to those who have wronged us yet have given no evidence of contrition before God or reliance on Jesus as their sin-bearer, we may say:

I fully and freely forgive you, sinner to sinner.... You have my forgiveness, given cheerfully in love. But just like me, a sinner like you, you need the personal enjoyment of Christ's forgiveness, which is also freely given. I will do anything I can to help you enjoy this.

Our responsibility is to forgive others fully, unconditionally."

- Forrest L. Bivens "Should we forgive others for all sins they may commit against us? If they show no remorse or repentance, are we still to offer our forgiveness?"

---



Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Intrepid Lutherans: Chemnitz's Absolution for only...":

The Chemnitz quote the Intrepid Lutheran Brian Heyer is certainly a faithful declaration of Christ's Word.

It's very good to see such a clear and strong confession come from them.

I do not believe Intrepid Rev. Spencer has as faithful a confession regarding Justification. His (W)ELSness comes through when he states in the posts comments, "It is also been my observation of practices among my Pastoral peers that we tend to give people "the benefit of the doubt." As you say, this is not necessarily, and by itself, a bad thing, or a sign of slack practice or poor theology. But then again it might be."

It is or it isn't.

I contend that it is a bad thing because it remains consistent with their chief satanic doctrine of Universal Forgiveness without faith. The (W)ELS as a Synod - confessing written and documented confession of UOJ - does not have Christ nor the Holy Spirit to guide them. Their heinous attacks on the Holy Spirit's faith and Christ Himself is in keeping with God's declaration that they are an abonimation to Him.

Proverbs 17:15 He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the LORD.

Those in the (W)ELS who confess such an abominable and Christ denying gospel as UOJ will be inconsistent and contradictory not only to Scripture and the Lutheran Confessions (which they falsely claim a confession of) but even to themselves. It is simply a fruit of the tree and an indication of being cut off.

Note Spencer's comment, "It must be noted that there is no "if" in this absolution, as in "If you repent . . . believe . . . act . . . ," but only that those "who" believe are absolved, etc... In other words, the fact that they are even able to repent shows their faith, and since this faith exists, the absolution is pronounced upon them."

This is indicative of UOJists who recoil at any suggestion that faith is a condition of being forgiven by God. It is a UOJ tenent which is tied to the doctrines teaching that faith is a work of man. Instead of teaching faithfully concerning faith as the righteousness of Christ and a gracious work of the Holy Spirit they attack it as a potentially synergistic act.

The "if" police in the UOJ corner are ground against the Rock of Scripture on this issue:

John 11:40 Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?

Romans 4:24 But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead;

Romans 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

1 Thessalonians 4:14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.

***

GJ - At this point the Lutheran Church should get the Gospel right, but there is too much hedging, parsing, and pussy-footing.

Bivens fouls the air even time he solemnly declares the dogma of UOJ. He bragged about going to Fuller Seminary and also denied going to Fuller Seminary. Which lie should we believe?

Lutheran training has been so poor in the Scriptures and the Confessions that the typical SynConference pastor cannot articulate justification by faith. He may recite the Knapp, Walther, or J. P. Meyer formula--variations on the same bilge of universal absolution--but he cannot explain atonement versus the declaration of forgiveness. He cannot describe how man receives grace in a way that harmonizes with the inspired Word. He cannot teach the Means of Grace, the efficacy of the Word, or the exclusive work of the Holy Spirit through the Word.

What is the most basic sermon on sin? John 16:8 - the Holy Spirit will convict the world of sin, because "they do not believe on Me." Can the typical SynConference pastor preach on that text and mean it?