Saturday, October 19, 2013

SpenerQuest Accuses ELDONA of Promoting Walther-Stephan Dogma


Walther signed the document making Stephan the bishop-for-life,
a fact Missouri loves to deny.

PS - Roland Bainton wrote about the School of the Prophets seminaries in early America. The theological student stayed in the parsonage and received his training from a veteran pastor. More than one candidate also married the minister's daughter.




George Mueller (Mueller)
Senior Member
Username: Mueller

Post Number: 1004
Registered: 11-2012
Posted on Saturday, October 19, 2013 - 8:06 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post


Well, we could talk about ELDoNA's new seminary and why it is called St. Ignatius. Like, wasn't it Ignatius who identified the church with the bishop, as if the bishop is the means of grace? A Lutheran seminary would identify the church with Christ and the means of grace. But if you deny objective justification, you have to find some sort of catalyst to make the means of grace efficacious. Perhaps the catalyst is the fellow who wears that purdy purple shirt!


George Mueller managed to describe the founding of the LCMS perfectly. Mueller could be a pen-name for Rolf Preus. We won't know until he reverses himself on UOJ several times in a row.

The resident Enthusiasts have definitely reclaimed Walther. They have his grasp of Lutheran doctrine (none), 
his ethics (none), and his desire to hide and deny the past.

Walther and crew did not suddenly discover Stephan's adultery in America (what a hoot). 

Their dictatorial bishop:
  • left his sick wife and dying children in Europe, after being under house arrest for adultery and financial improprieties, 
  • took his mistress and female groupies to America,
  • and spread his syphilis among the young women. THAT was the scandal.



Luther's Sermon for the Twenty-Second Sunday after Trinity. Matthew 18:23-35



Luther's Sermon for the TWENTY-SECOND SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY. Matthew 18:23-35

This sermon is found in all the editions of the Church Postil and in three pamphlet prints, which appeared in 1524, two at Wittenberg and one at Augsburg by S. Otmar. Title: “Sermon on the 23 Sunday after Pentecost.”

Erl. 14, 279; W. 11, 2383; St. L. 11, 1786.

Text: Matthew 18:23-35. Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened unto a certain king, who would make a reckoning with his servants. And when he had begun to reckon, one was brought to him, that owed him ten thousand talents. But forasmuch as he had not wherewith to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made.

The servant therefore fell down and worshipped him, saying, Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay thee all. And the lord of that servant, being moved with compassion, released him, and forgave him the debt. But that servant went out, and found one of his fellow-servants, who owed him a hundred shillings: and he laid hold on him, and took him by the throat, saying, Pay what thou owest. So his fellow-servant fell down and besought him, saying, Have patience with me, and I will pay thee. And he would not: but went and cast him into prison, till he should pay that which was due. So when his fellow servants saw what was done, they were exceeding sorry, and came and told unto their lord all that was done. Then his lord called him unto him, and saith to him, Thou wicked servant, I forgave thee all that debt, because thou besoughtest me: shouldest not thou also have had mercy on thy fellow-servant, even as I had mercy on thee? And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due. So shall also my heavenly Father do unto you, if ye forgive not every one his brother from your hearts.

CONTENTS:

THE UNMERCIFUL SERVANT; OR, THE PARABLE OF THE KING WHO RECKONED WITH HIS SERVANTS.
I. THIS PARABLE IN GENERAL.

1. The occasion given Christ to utter it.

2. An objection, raised by it, and the answer. 2-4.

* The Gospel and kingdom of God are a state in which there is nothing but forgiveness.

3. This parable does not treat of a temporal kingdom, but the kingdom of God.

4. This parable contains two parts.

* To what persons this Gospel applies, and to what persons it does not. 7-8.

II. THIS PARABLE IN PARTICULAR.

A. The First Part of this Parable.

1. How the wicked servant was summoned to give an account.

2. How and why Judgment was passed upon him.

3. How he asked for grace. 11-12.

* How the poor consciences in the Papacy were tormented. 11-13.

4. How his lord had mercy upon the wicked servant. 14f.

* The way and office of the Gospel, and how God deals with us. 15-16.

* Our works avail nothing for the forgiveness of sins.

* The Gospel is not for the careless but for the troubled consciences, and must be grasped by faith. 17-18.

* Not by our works and free will, but from God’s grace we obtain the forgiveness of sins. 19-21.

B. The Second Part of This Parable.

1. How the wicked servant went out. 22-23.

* How the unmerciful servant will not forgive his fellow servant his debt. 24f.

2. What should move us to love our neighbor and to aid him with our means. 25-28.

3. How and why the wicked servant must experience his lord’s wrath and displeasure.

* The punishment of God which falls upon those who despise his Gospel and grace. 30-32.

* Whenever God wished to punish a country, he first raised up in it a great light.

* The Gospel is sweet to troubled consciences, but terrifying to the hardened ones.

* An opinion of the dispute of the Sophists: whether the sins would return when once forgiven. 34.

SUMMARY OF THIS GOSPEL:

1. Through the mercy and grace of God all sins will be forgiven, however great they may be. But his sins will not be forgiven, who will not forgive his brother, as Christ has taught us to pray: “Forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors.” Matthew 6:12. This Gospel or parable Christ our Lord spoke in reply to St. Peter, to whom he had just entrusted the keys to loose and to bind, Matthew 16:19, when Peter asked him how often he should forgive his neighbor, whether seven times were enough? He answered: “Not seven times, but seventy times seven,” and Christ then related this parable, and with it concludes, that our heavenly Father will do unto us, if we forgive not our neighbor, as this king did unto his servant, who would not forgive his fellow-servant a very small debt, after he had forgiven him so great a debt.

2. First, before we consider the Gospel itself, let us examine what kind of a rebuke it is, by which this servant’s right is denied. For the other servant who owed him a hundred shillings, should according to justice have justly paid him this money. Even the first also had a good right to demand what was his own. If an appeal had been made to the public sentiment, every one would have been compelled to agree with him and say: It is just and right for him to pay what he owes. Why then this procedure, that his lord abolishes his claim, and besides condemns the servant because he demands and executes his right? Answer: It was thus written that we might know that it is altogether a different thing in the eye of God than it is in the eye of the world, and often that which is not right before God, is right and just before the world. For before the world this servant stands an honorable man; but before God he is called a wicked servant, and he is blamed for acting as one who is worthy of eternal condemnation.

3. It is therefore decreed when we deal with God that we must stand free, and let goods, honor, right, wrong, and every thing go that we have; and we will not be excused when we say: I am right, therefore I will not suffer a man to do me wrong, as God requires that we should renounce all our rights and forgive our neighbor. Concerning this, however, our high schools and the learned have preached and taught quite differently, that we are not obliged to give way to another and surrender our rights, but that it is just for every one to secure his dues. This is the first rebuff. Now let us consider this Gospel more fully.

4. We have often said that the Gospel or kingdom of God is nothing else than a state or government, in which there is nothing but forgiveness of sins. And wherever there is a state or government in which sins are not forgiven, no Gospel or kingdom of God is found there. Therefore we must clearly distinguish these two kingdoms from each other, in which sins are rebuked, and sins are forgiven, or in which our right is demanded, and our right is pardoned. In the kingdom of God, where God rules with the Gospel, there is no demand for right and dues, but all is pure forgiveness, pardon and giving, no anger, no punishment, but all is pure brotherly service and kindness.

5. By this, however, our civil rights are not abolished. For this parable teaches nothing of the kingdom of this world, but only of the kingdom of God. Therefore, whoever is only under the civil government of the world, is far from the kingdom of heaven, for all this still belongs to perdition. As when a prince so rules his people as not to permit anyone to be wronged, and punishes the evil doer, does well and is praised. For thus it is in this government: Pay what thou owest, if not, you will be cast into prison. Such government we must have, but no one will thereby get to heaven, nor will the world be saved by it. But it is necessary for the reason that the world may not become worse, it is only a protection against and a prevention of wickedness. For if it were not for this government, one would devour the other, and no person could protect his life, goods, wife and child. So in order that everything may not go to ruin, God has instituted functions of the sword, by which wickedness may in part be prevented, so that the civil government may secure and maintain peace, and no one may wrong another. Therefore it must be tolerated. And yet as we have said, it has not been established for citizens of heaven, but simply in order that the people may not fall deeper into hell, and make matters worse.

Therefore no one dare boast, who is under the civil government, that he therefore does right before God. Before him, all is yet wrong. For you must come to the point, that you also avoid what the world claims to be right.

6. The aim of this Gospel is to describe to us forgiveness for both parties.

First the lord forgives the servant all his debt. Then he demands of him that he also in like manner forgive his fellow-servant and pardon his debt. This God demands, and thus his kingdom shall stand. Hence no one should be so wicked and allow himself to be so angry, as to be unable to forgive his neighbor. And, as is written, if he would even offend you seventy times seven times, that is, as often as he is able to offend you, you are to let your right and claim go, and freely give him everything. Why so? Because Christ has also done the same for you, in that he began and established a kingdom in which there is nothing but grace, that is to endure forever, that every thing, as often as you sin, may be forgiven; because he has sent forth his Gospel, not to proclaim punishment, but grace alone. Now, because this government stands, you can at all times rise again, however deep and often you fall. For even if you fall, yet this Gospel and mercy-seat remain and stand forever; therefore as soon as you come and rise again, you again have grace. But he requires of you to forgive your neighbor whatever he has done against you, else you will neither be in this gracious kingdom nor enjoy the Gospel, that your sins may be forgiven. This in short is the idea and sense of this Gospel.

7. However, it is here not forgotten who those are who grasp and enjoy the Gospel. For it is indeed a glorious kingdom and a gracious government, because there is preached in it nothing but the forgiveness of sins, though it does not enter every one’s heart. Hence there are many rude and vicious people who misuse the Gospel, who live a free life and do as they please, and think no one shall ever rebuke them, because the Gospel preaches nothing but the forgiveness of sins. To those the Gospel is not preached, who thus despise the great treasure and treat it wantonly; for this reason they do not belong to this kingdom, but only to the civil government, where they may be prevented from doing whatever they wish.

8. To whom then is the Gospel preached? To those who feel their distress as this servant does his. Therefore observe, how it is with him? The lord has compassion on his wretchedness, and gives him more than he could desire. But before this is done, the text says that the lord would make a reckoning with his servants; and as he began to reckon this one appeared before him, who owed him ten thousand talents; but as he had not wherewith to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made. This was indeed no cheering sermon, nothing but great earnestness, and the most terrible sentence. Now he becomes so uneasy that he falls down and pleads for grace, and promises more than he has and can pay, and says: “Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay thee all.” Here are pictured and set forth those who enjoy the Gospel in its full measure.

9. For thus it is between God and us. When God wishes to reckon with us, he sends forth the preaching of the law, by which we learn to know what we owe. As when God says to the conscience: “Thou shalt have no other gods,” but esteem me only as God and love me with all thy heart, and trust in me alone; this is the reckoning and the register, in which is written what we owe, this he takes in hand and reads to us and says: Do you see what you are required to do? You are to fear, love and honor me alone, and trust only in me, and hope in me for the best. But you do the contrary and are my enemy, you do not believe in me, but put your trust in other things.

To sum up, you see here you do not keep a single letter of the Law.

10. Now when the conscience hears such things, and the Law thoroughly comes at us, then we see our duty, and that we have not done it, and we perceive that we have not kept a letter of it, and must confess we have not believed or loved God a single moment. What now will the Lord do? When the conscience is thus led captive and confesses that it must be lost, and becomes anxious and fearful, he says: Sell him and all he has, that payment may be made. This is the sentence which immediately follows, when the Law reveals sins and says: This thou shouldst do and have done, but thou hast not done it. For punishment follows sin, that payment may be made.

For God has not given his Law to the end to allow those to escape who disobey it. It is not sweet nor friendly, but brings with it bitter, horrible punishment, and delivers us to satan, casts us into hell, and leaves us in punishment until we have paid the uttermost farthing. This St. Paul has correctly explained to the Romans, 4:15: “For the Law worketh wrath.”

That is, when it reveals to us that we have done wrong, it brings home to our hearts nothing but his wrath and displeasure. For when the conscience sees it has done wrong, it feels that it is worthy of eternal death; and if punishment would soon follow, it would have to despair. This is meant, when the lord commands this servant to be sold with all he has, because he cannot make payment.

11. What does the servant do now? He foolishly goes to work and thinks he will still pay the debt, falls down and asks the lord to have patience with him. This is the torment of all consciences, when sin comes and smarts deeply until they feel in what a sad state they are before God; then they have no rest, run hither and thither, seek help here and there, to become free from sin, and in their presumption think they can do enough to pay God in full. As we have been taught hitherto; from which also have come so many pilgrimages, charitable foundations, cloisters, masses and other nonsense; so we fasted and scourged ourselves, and became monks and nuns. And all this came because we undertook to begin a life and to do many works of which God should take account and allow himself to be paid by them, and had thought to quiet and put the conscience at peace with God; and so we have acted just like this fool in today’s lesson.

12. Now a heart that is thus smitten with the Law, and feels its blows and distress, is truly humiliated. Therefore it falls before the Lord and asks for grace, except that it still makes the mistake that it will help itself; for this we cannot root out of our nature. When the conscience feels such misery, it dare promise more than all the angels in heaven are able to do. Here one can easily promise and bind himself to do every thing that may be required of him; for he finds himself at all times thus prepared, that he still hopes to do enough for his sin by means of his good works.

13. Now behold the things men were guilty of heretofore in the world’s history, and you will find it so. Then men preached: Give to the church, run into the cloister, establish many masses, and then your sins will be forgiven.

And when they forced our consciences in the confessional, we did everything they imposed upon us, and gave more than they demanded of us. What should the poor people do? They were glad to be helped in this manner; therefore they ran and martyred themselves to get rid of their sins; and yet it did no good whatever, for the conscience remained in doubt as before, so that it did not know on what terms it stood with God; or if it were secure; it became still worse and fell into the presumption, that God had to regard their works. Reason cannot let this alone nor get around it, so as to abandon it.

14. Hence the Lord comes and sympathizes with this distress, because the servant thus lies captive and bound in his sins, and in addition to this is such a fool as to want to help himself, looks for no mercy, knows nothing to say of grace, and feels nothing but sins, which press him heavily, and knows no one to help him. Then his lord has mercy on him and sets him free.

15. Here is represented to us the Gospel and its nature, and how God deals with us. When you are thus held fast in sins and you torment yourself to become free from them, the Gospel comes and says: “No, not so, my dear friend, it will do no good for you to torture and torment yourself to madness; your works accomplish nothing, but God’s mercy does it all; he has compassion on your affliction, and sees you a captive in such anguish, struggling in the mire and that cannot help yourself out, he sees that you cannot pay the debt, therefore he forgives you all.”

Hence it is nothing but pure mercy. For he forgives you the debt, not because of your works and merit, but because he pities your cries, complaints and humiliation. This means that God has regard for an humble heart, as the Prophet David says in Psalm 51:19: “The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit, a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise.” Such a heart, he says, is broken and cast down and cannot help itself, and is glad when God gives it a helping hand; this is the best sacrifice before God, and the true way to heaven.

16. Now this follows out of mercy; because God pities our distress, he yields his claims and nullifies them and never says: Sell what you have and make payment. He might well have proceeded and said: You must pay, I have the right to demand it, I will not on your account annul my own right, and no one could have blamed him. Yet, he does not wish to deal with him according to our ideas of right, but changes justice into grace, has mercy on him, and gives him liberty, with wife and child and everything he has, and makes him a present of the debt besides.

This is what God preaches through the Gospel, namely: He who believes, to him not only the debt, but also the punishment shall be remitted. To this no works are to be added; for whoever preaches that through his works one can atone for his debt and punishment, has already denied the Gospel.

For the two can not be tolerated together, that God should have mercy, and that you should have any merit. If it is grace, then it is not merit: but if it is merit, then it is justice and no grace. Romans 11:6. For if you pay what you owe, he shows you no mercy; but if he shows mercy, you do not pay for what you receive. Therefore we must leave him alone to deal with us, receive from him and believe. This is what to-day’s Gospel teaches.

17. Now you see, since this servant is thus humbled through the knowledge of his sins, that the Word ministers very strong comfort to him, when the Lord declares him free, and remits him both the debt and the punishment.

By this is indicated that the Gospel does not reach vicious hearts, nor those who walk forth impudently, but only troubled consciences whose sins oppress them, from which they desire to be free; on these God will have mercy and bestow upon them all things.

18. Thus this servant now received the Word, and thereby became God’s friend. For if he had not received the Word, it would have done him no good, and forgiveness would have amounted to nothing. Therefore it is not enough that God has the forgiveness of sins offered to us, and has proclaimed the golden year of the kingdom of grace; but it must also be grasped and believed. If you believe it, then you are free from sin, and all is right. Now this is the first part of a Christian life, taught by this and all the Gospels, which properly consists in faith, that deals only with God. Besides it is also indicated that we cannot grasp the Gospel, unless there be present first a conscience that is afflicted and miserable because of sin.

19. Now conclude from this that it is nothing but deception that is preached in relation to our works and free will, and if a different way to blot out sin and obtain grace is taught, than this Gospel here advocates, namely, that the divine Majesty looks upon our wretchedness and has mercy upon us. For the text says clearly, that he presents and remits to those who have nothing; and thus concludes that we have nothing wherewith to remunerate God. So you may have free will as you wish in temporal things, in outward life and character, or in outward piety and virtue, as man can have in his own strength, yet you hear now that it is nothing before God. What can free will do here? There is nothing in it at any rate but struggling and trembling. Therefore, if you would be free from sin, you must desist from and despair in all your own works, and cling to the cross and plead for grace, and then lay hold of the Gospel by faith.

20. Now follows the second part of this parable, that of the fellow-servant.

We would gladly die every hour for the sake of our faith. For this servant has enough, he retains his life and goods, wife and child and has a gracious lord; so he would be a great fool if he would now go and do everything he could to obtain a gracious lord. His lord might then well say, he only mocks me. Therefore, he dare not add any work, but only receives the grace offered him, be joyful and thank the Lord, and do unto others as the Lord did to him.

21. Thus it is now with us. If we believe, then we have a gracious God, and need no more, and it would indeed be well for us to die soon. But if we are to live on earth, our life must not be devoted to obtain God’s favor by means of our works; for he who does this mocks and blasphemes God. As men hitherto have taught, that we must so long lie at God’s ears with our good works, praying, fasting and the like, until we obtain grace. Grace we have already received, not through our works but through God’s mercy.. If you are to live, you must have something to do and work at, and all this must be devoted to your neighbor, says Christ.

22. But that servant went out. How does he go out? Where has he been within? He had been in faith, but now he goes out through love, by which he is to show himself to the people. For faith leads the people from the people unto God, but love leads out unto the people. Previously he was within, between God and himself alone, for no one can see or vouch for faith, how both work together. Therefore one must needs go out of the eyes of the people, where no one is seen or felt but God; this is transacted alone through faith, and no external work can be added to it. Now he comes out before his neighbor. If he had remained within, he could well have died; but he must come out and live among other people and mingle with them. Here he finds a fellow-servant whom he strikes and beats, and throttles him, demands payment and shows no mercy.

23. This is what we have often said, that we Christians must break forth, and show by our deeds and before the people that we have the true faith.

God does not need your works, he has enough in your faith. Yet he wants you to work that you may show thereby your faith to yourself and all the world. For God indeed sees faith, but you and the people do not yet see it, therefore you should devote the works of faith to the benefit of your neighbor. Thus this servant is an example and picture of all those who should serve their neighbor through faith.

24. But what does he do? Just as we who think we believe, and partly do believe, and rejoice that we have heard the Gospel and can say a great deal about it; but no one wants to follow it in his life. We have brought matters so far, that the doctrine and jugglery of the devil have been partly overthrown, and we now see what is right and what is wrong, that we must deal with God alone through faith, but with our neighbor through our works. But we cannot bring it to pass, that, as to love, one does to another as God has done to him; as we ourselves complain that some of us have become much worse than they were before.

25. As this servant will not forgive his neighbor, but seeks to collect his claim; so we also do and say: I am not in duty bound to give what is my own to another, and yield my rights. If another has offended me, he owes it to me to reconcile me and ask pardon. For thus the world teaches and acts.

And here you are right, and no prince or king will compel you to give to another what is your own; but they must permit you to do what you wish with your own. The civil government only compels so far, that you may not do with another’s goods what you would, not that you must give your goods to another. This is right before the world, as reason concludes: To every one belongs his own. Therefore, he does not do wrong, who uses his goods as he will, and robs no one of his own.

26. But what says this Gospel? If God also would have acted thus and had maintained his right and said: I act in harmony with justice, when I punish the wicked and take what is my own, who will prevent me? where then would we all be? We would all go to ruin. Therefore, because he has given up his claim on thee, he desires that you too should do likewise. Therefore, also give up your right and think: If God has given me ten thousand pounds, why should I not give my neighbor a hundred shillings?

27. Thus your goods are no longer your own, but your neighbor’s. God could indeed have kept his own, for he owed you nothing. Yet he gives himself wholly unto you, becomes your gracious Lord, is kind to you, and serves you with all his goods, and what he has is all yours; why then will you not also do likewise? Hence, if you wish to be in his kingdom you must do as he does; but if you want to remain in the kingdom of the world, you will not enter his kingdom. Therefore the sentence in Matthew 25:42, which Christ will speak on the last day belongs to those who are not Christians: “For I was hungry, and ye did not give me to eat; I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink,” and so on.

28. But you say: Do you still insist that God will have no regard for our good works, and on their account will save no one? Answer: He would have them done freely without any thought of remuneration; not that we thereby obtain something, but that we do them to our neighbor, and thereby show that we have the true faith; for what have you then that you gave him and by which you merit anything, that he should have mercy on you and forgive you all things that you have done against him? Or what profit has he by it? Nothing has he, but that you praise and thank him, and do as he has done, that God may be thanked in thee, then you are in his kingdom and have all things that you should have. This is the other part of the Christian life, which is called love, by which one goes out from God to his neighbor.

29. Those who do not prove their faith by their works of love are servants who want others to forgive them, but do not forgive their neighbor, nor yield their rights; hence it will also be with them as with this servant. For when the other servants, who preach the Gospel, see that God has freely given them all things, and they refuse to forgive anyone, they become sad to see such things, and they are pained, that they act so foolishly toward the Gospel, and no one lays hold of it. What do they do then? They can do no more than come before their Lord with their complaint and say: So it goes; you forgive them both the debt and the punishment, and freely give them all things; but we cannot prevail upon them to do to others as you have done to them. This is the complaint. Then God will summon them to appear before him at the last judgment and accuse them of these things and say: When you were hungry, thirsty and afflicted, I helped you; when you lay in sins I had compassion upon you and forgave the debt; therefore you must also now pay your debt. There is now no grace nor mercy, nothing but wrath and eternal punishment, no prayers will help from now on, and they become speechless, and are cast into torment until they pay the uttermost farthing.

30. St. Peter said the same of those who heard the Gospel and again fell away. 2 Peter 2:21: “For it were better for them, not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after knowing it, to turn back from the holy commandment delivered unto them.” Why would it be better? Because. if they turn back it will be twofold worse with them, than it was before they had heard the Gospel; as Christ says in Matthew 12:45, of the unclean spirit, who takes unto himself seven other spirits worse than himself, comes with them and dwells in the man out of whom they were cast, and the last state of that man becomes worse than the first.

31. Thus it is now with us also, and it will be still more so. So it also was with Rome. There things were in a fine condition in the days of the martyrs. But afterwards they went to ruin, and abominations arose and Antichrist ruled, and the city became so wicked that it could not be worse.

The grace of God preached through the Gospel is so great that the people do not grasp it, therefore great and terrible punishment must also follow.

Thus we will see just punishment come upon us, inasmuch as we do not obey the Gospel we have and know.

32. For as often as God has afflicted the people with severe punishment, he previously set up a great light; as when he led the Jews out of their country into captivity, he first brought forth the pious king Josiah, who again restored the law in order to reform the people; but when they again fell away, God punished them as they deserved. So also when he wished to overthrow the Egyptians, he sent Moses and Aaron to preach and enlighten them, Exodus 4:14. Again, when he wished to destroy the world with the flood, he raised up the patriarch Noah, Genesis 6, and 7. But when the people would not believe and only grew worse, terrible punishment followed. So it was with the five cities; Sodom and Gomorrah with the rest were punished, because they would not hear pious Lot, Genesis 19.

Therefore such terrible punishments will also now come upon those who hear the Gospel and do not receive it. So this servant in the Gospel is cast off, and must pay what he owes. This means, that he must endure the pain and consequences. But he who endures the pain for the debt, will never be saved. For to sin belongs death, and when one dies he dies forever, and there is no more help nor salvation for him. Therefore let us receive these things as a warning; those, however, who are hardened and will not hear, will guard against it.

33. This is an elegant, comfortable Gospel, and is sweet to the afflicted conscience, because it contains nothing but forgiveness of sins. But for stubborn heads and hardened hearts it is a terrible sentence, and particularly so because this servant is not a heathen, but belongs to those under the Gospel, who held the faith. For as the Lord has mercy on him and forgives him what he had done, he must without doubt be a Christian.

Hence this is not a punishment for the heathen, neither for the common crowd who hear the Gospel with the external ear, and have it on their tongue, but do not live according to it. Thus we have the sum of this Gospel.

34. What further the sophists are accustomed here to discuss, whether the sins will come back that were once forgiven, I let pass. For they do not know what forgiveness of sin is, and think it is something that sticks in the heart and lies still there, whereas it is the whole kingdom of Christ, which lasts forever without end. For as the sun shines and gives light none the less, although I close my eyes, so this mercy seat or forgiveness of sins stands forever, though I fall. And as I see the sun again as soon as I open my eyes, so I have the forgiveness of sins again when I look up and again come to Christ. Therefore we must not make forgiveness so narrow, as the fools dream. This is said on to-day’s Gospel.


This Sunday - Study of Luther's Large Catechism Begins


We just finished the Book of Romans, noting how clear St. Paul teaches justification by faith.

I hope to do the Lenski work next on Romans 16. Promises are so much like goals - easy to make, even easier to ignore.

Luther's Large Catechism is almost completely ignored by the Synodical Conference. Many clergy ignore the Book of Concord altogether, and if they do know anything about the Lutheran Symbols, the Large Catechism is not high on their list.

The Large Catechism is derived from Luther's sermons and is designed to be a guide for clergy and laity. The ALC used to publish it separately as a small book, and that was an ideal way to carry it around and appreciate it. I kept one copy available at home and read often, but I searched it more thoroughly when I wrote Thy Strong Word.




SpenerQuest Announces JBFA Seminary with a Few Childish Remarks - Ignores the Topic of Justification by Faith.
UOJ Hive Has Stopped Buzzing


Rev. Robert Fischer (Fischer)
Intermediate Member
Username: Fischer

Post Number: 316
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Friday, October 18, 2013 - 1:42 pm:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

St. Ignatius Lutheran Theological Seminary
Malone, Texas

+ + +

A Seminary of the Evangelical Lutheran Diocese of North America

The Evangelical Lutheran Diocese of North America (ELDoNA) is a Christian fellowship body that is committed to upholding historical Christian orthodoxy and the faithful teaching and practice of it. In every aspect of the Church we strive to observe all that Jesus Christ has commanded; and we firmly maintain that the Lutheran Confessions are a faithful and invaluable exposition of God's holy teachings.

With the Augsburg Confession our churches declare, "Of Ecclesiastical Order, they teach, that no one should publicly teach in the Church or administer the Sacraments, unless he be regularly called" (Article XIV). It is of critical importance that no one imagine he can take up the ministry by himself; Christ Jesus established the holy office, and He calls men through His Church to serve in that office. For this reason, our pastors and the congregations they serve (also with the support and aid of the Association of Confessional Lutheran Churches [ACLC], with whom we are in fellowship) have worked together to establish the groundwork for the St. Ignatius Seminary.

Candidates for the office of the ministry will be instructed by the pastors of our fellowship. Our parish pastors bring their individual talents to the various aspects of seminary instruction, as well as providing constant example of the work that a called servant of the Word does for the congregation of the saints. This arrangement also allows for many of our pastors to examine the faithfulness of the men with whom they may be working in the holy office.

Throughout the three years of instruction, seminarians will receive a thorough education in Greek, the study of the Scriptures, and biblical doctrine (especially as set in the confessional documents of the Book of Concord). Seminarians will also learn the history of the Church, and will be taught historic Lutheran practice with regard to the conduct of the Divine Service, catechesis, and other aspects of the calling of the pastoral office.

At present, Christian orthodoxy is found primarily in small congregations that are typically unable to offer large salaries to their shepherds. Many confessional Lutheran pastors earn very humble wages from their parishes and work for secondary sources of income in order to provide for their families. Understanding this reality, we consider it unfaithful to burden the men who would study for the ministry with large educational expenses. We have created a financial structure for St. Ignatius that is very reasonable, and it encourages men to be faithful stewards by keeping seminary fees low and in proper proportion to the incomes that are earned by confessional Lutheran pastors.

It is with great joy and thanks to God that we are able to announce that St. Ignatius Lutheran Theological Seminary is accepting students and prepared to begin our first year of training once we have sufficient enrollment! Potential students and other inquiries may be directed to the bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Diocese of North America:

Bishop James Heiser
c/o Salem Lutheran Church
718 HCR 3424 E
Malone, Texas 76660
(254) 602-2018
hunnis@mac.com


http://saintignatiusseminary.com/

Virtue Online Describes the Former Archbishop of Canterbury as Clueless

Former Archbishop of Canterbury Fails to See Gay Wrath Against Heterosexuals Who Oppose Their Behavior 
Rowan Williams says Church should surrender to Gays. He accuses church of being "appallingly violent" towards gays
Gay persecution of Christians reaches epidemic proportions

NEWS ANALYSIS

By David W. Virtue 
www.virtueonline.org 
October 18, 2013

Former Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Rowan Williams needs to get a life, better still get his facts correct.

He recently opined that the Church is wrong on gays and called on the Church to rethink its views on homosexuality. "I think the church has to put its hands up and say our attitude towards gay people has at times been appallingly violent. Even now it can be unconsciously patronizing and demeaning."

Williams, 63, Master of Magdalen College, Cambridge, resigned as leader of the Anglican Communion leaving it in tatters, according to Nigerian Archbishop Nicholas Okoh, because he failed as leader to address the very issue that now divides the Anglican Communion - homosexual behavior.

So, after a lackluster leadership (he departed nine years before he had to), he now wants the church to raise the white flag of surrender to the most virulent lobby in the history of the church -- namely the gay lobby - a lobby that outshines women for bishops, lobbies for the poor, lobbies for the Prayer Book, lobbies for the disenfranchised et al. As the flag of surrender goes up, Williams wants orthodox Anglicans to grovel on bended knee before the likes of (the Rev.) Colin Coward ofChanging Attitude and beg forgiveness for their alleged homophobia.

It seems that the primary qualification to being Archbishop of Canterbury is a highly developed skill at nailing one's colors to a passing shoal of jelly fish.

Not content with messing up the Anglican Communion under his tenure he recently urged Presbyterians in Scotland not to split over gay ministers. He counseled the Church of Scotland to stay together and no to split over gay ministers. Williams urged evangelical congregations not to "walk away" over the ordination of gay ministers. So, after deepening the divide in the Anglican Communion he now interferes in another denomination in the hope that THEY will listen to him.

Williams, for all his brilliance, is why you should never ever have academics running the church. They live in a disconnected universe. (See the Anglican Communion Institute's (ACI) take on The Episcopal Church's heresies.) It is why, last summer, Rome's Cardinals chose a leader in Pope Francis who is not an academic. He has the remarkable and very humble pastoral ability to say that while the church should show compassion to homosexuals, the church (his church) should not condemn or marginalize them IF THEY ACCEPT THE LORD. Those five words make all the difference between Rome and Canterbury, between TEC/ACoC and ACNA, between revisionism and orthodoxy, and, dare we say it, between the saved and the lost.

Is it any wonder that Pope Francis and Argentine Anglican Bishop Gregory Venables (former Archbishop of the Southern Cone and a Brit) have more in common than Williams and Venables. What a different communion it would have been had Venables been chosen Archbishop of Canterbury. Rome had the good sense to reach outside of Italy to Latin America for a new leader; the Church of England could have done the same.

Williams recently stated, "This is the one area where there is the deepest sense of the church being out of step with what the rest of the culture takes for granted. I think it's quite difficult for some people outside of the church to recognize that there is something in the matter of several thousand years of assumption, reflection and ethical practice here which isn't likely to be overturned in a moment."

Since when? The Early Church was not only counter-cultural, it was underground. It did not sacrifice to the Emperor. It should not do so now. What would Williams say to the Uganda Martyrs, Christian converts, who were murdered for their faith for their resistance to King Mwanga's homosexual practices?

Should the Ugandan Martyrs have waved the flag of surrender to a King who wanted to sodomize them? To Williams' mind, they undoubtedly should have.

What about the Plymouth Brethren couple in England who owned a Bed and Breakfast? They refused to rent a bed to two homosexuals, were sued, and finally forced to sell their home. I suppose if Williams had owned the B&B he would have invited them in, offered them a glass of sherry before they toddled off to bed to do who knows what.

In August, a gay couple announced they were mounting a legal challenge against a state law that allows British churches to opt out of holding gay weddings. Fascism at is best.

And when was the last time you heard of straight white males attacking gays that made the headlines. 

We now know that Matt Shepard, the gay poster boy of homophobia, was not killed because he was gay, but because of a drug deal gone wrong. He, we now learn, was a child molester of two eight-year olds, according to a new book written about Shepard's death by gay author Stephen Jimenez in The Book of MattHidden Truths about Shepard's Death. He wrote at length about a "false mythology" surrounding Matthew's life and his suffering.

It is precisely this "false mythology" held, encapsulated and mouthed off by Rowan Williams that almost sank the Anglican Communion. 

Consider the most recent publicized cases of reverse homophobia. Stephen Beale writing for Crisis Magazine says that gay persecution of Christians is reaching epidemic proportions and cites the following instances.

Sweet Cakes, a bakery run by Melissa Klein and her husband in Portland, Oregon, were forced to close their doors at the end of the summer because they were sued for not baking a cake for a lesbian wedding. The couple received death threats. Then, activists broadened the boycott by saying that any wedding vendor that did business with Sweet Cakes would be targeted.

The final nail in the coffin came in August when the slighted lesbian couple filed an anti-discrimination suit with the state. "The LGBT attacks are the reason we are shutting down the shop. They have killed our business through mob tactics," Klein said. His wife added: "I guess in my mind I thought we lived in a lot nicer of a world where everybody tolerated everybody."

Where and why is the "tolerance" Williams wants from heterosexuals to homosexuals not reciprocated?

In 2006, a noted advocate for traditional marriage, Maggie Gallagher, warned that the legalization of same-sex marriage would lead to constraints on religious freedom. Writing in the Weekly Standard, Gallagher saw the end of adoptions services by Boston Catholic Charities as a foreshadowing of things to come, noted

This March, after the introduction of gay marriage in America, a number of latent concerns about the impact of this innovation on religious freedom ceased to be theoretical. 

Conservatives pleaded that there would negative consequences from gay marriage. They were right.

The fate of Catholic Charities of Boston is now on the line. Is it an aberration or a sign of things to come?

Beale notes the following: "Seven years later, we have the answer. There have been at least 11 instances of wedding vendors and venues facing some form of recrimination-threats, boycotts, protests, and the intervention of state or judicial authorities-because they denied services for gay nuptials because of their faith. Besides Sweet Cakes by Melissa, they are:

■ Masterpiece Cakeshop, Colorado: Owner Jack Phillips refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple in July. The Lakewood bakery has faced at least two protests, a Facebook-driven boycott, and a discrimination complaint from the state Attorney General that was scheduled for a hearing in September. Phillips has said he would rather close his bakeshop than compromise his Christian beliefs. (Sources: news reports including Washington Times and Huffington Post.)

■ Victoria's Cake Cottage, Iowa: Baker Victoria Childress denied service to a lesbian couple hoping to get married in 2011. The Des Moines baker was called a "bigot" and faced a protest and Facebook boycott but refused to budge, citing her Christian faith. (Sources: news reports including Washington Times and Huffington Post.)

■ Fleur Cakes, Oregon: Pam Regentin, the owner of the Mount Hood-area cake shop, refused to make a cake for a lesbian couple earlier this year, sparking another Facebook boycott in May. (Sources: news reports including local television.)

■ Liberty Ridge Farm, New York: The family-owned farm in mid-state New York is facing a human rights complaint after refusing to host a lesbian wedding in 2012. (Sources: local news sourceshere and here and the Huffington Post.)

■ All Occasion Party Place, Texas: In February, the Fort Worth-based wedding venue declined to host a wedding reception for a gay couple. An online boycott has now been launched against the business. (Sources: local news and the Huffington Post.)

■ Gortz Haus, Iowa: After refusing to host a gay wedding (reported in August), Betty Odgaard, the owner of the business, received threatening calls and e-mails and now must contend with a complaint the couple has filed with the state civil rights commission. (Sources: local news sources here and here and the Huffington Post.)

■ Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association, New Jersey: In 2012, a state judge ruled that a Methodist-owned events venue in Ocean Grove violated state law when it refused to host a gay wedding in 2007. Also, while the discrimination case was still pending, the facility lost its state tax exemption because it was deemed "no longer met the requirements as a place open to all members of the public," the New York Times reported. (Sources: The New York Times, Philadelphia Inquirer, and LifeSiteNews.)

■ Elane Photography, New Mexico: The state Supreme Court ruled in August that a New Mexico photography business owned by Elaine Huguenin and her husband Jon could not legally deny services to same-sex couples. The photographer had refused service for a lesbian commitment ceremony in 2006. One of the women had filed a complaint with the state Human Rights Commission, which ruled against the photographers in 2008, prompting an appeals process that led to the high court decision. It's now unclear what will happen to the business. (Sources: press releases and news reports including the Catholic News Agency and the Santa Fe New Mexican. The case is discussed further below.)

■ Arlene's Flowers, Washington: A florist refused to provide flowers to a gay wedding last March and now owner Baronelle Stutzman is facing a lawsuit from the state Attorney General. (Sources: news reports including local television and the Associated Press.)

■ Wildflower Inn, Vermont: A lesbian couple sued the Wildflower Inn under the state public accommodations law in 2011 after being told they could not have their wedding reception there. The owners were reportedly open to holding same-sex ceremonies as long as customers were notified that the events personally violated their Catholic faith. It wasn't enough. The inn had to settle the case in 2012, paying a $10,000 fine and putting double that amount in a charitable trust. Also, the inn is no longer hosting weddings, although the decision reportedly was made before the settlement. (Sources: The New York Times and Huffington Post.)

These cases represent a new battlefield in the clash between the freedoms of Christians and the "radical homosexual agenda," said Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of The Thomas Moore Law Center. "Despite their relatively small numbers, radical homosexuals wield enormous power. They dominate our cultural elite, Hollywood, television, the mainstream news media, public schools, academia, and a significant portion of the judiciary," Thompson said in an e-mail interview. "As a result of their power, homosexual activists are able to intimidate and silence opposition."

What does Williams say about all this? The answer: nothing. He can't because he rolled over to the other side in his book The Body's Grace. He also refused to engage in any meaningful way with Dr. Robert Gagnon's book The Bible and Homosexual Practice, the most comprehensive book on homosexuality ever written, because he was theologically outgunned.

New anti-discrimination laws are being written that will, in time, see Christians going to jail because of their beliefs because THEIR freedoms will be denied. It won't just be Christians in the Middle East and Global South who are persecuted and killed for declaring Christ and Him crucified against Muslim aggressors and crazies. It will be the more subtle, but equally evil driven by pansexual Western gay lobbyists and their sycophantic followers like Rowan Williams (and it would seem Justin Welby) who now demand that orthodox Anglicans roll over and play dead to sodomy.

Gays yell and scream for the dignity of a person and their behavior, but if a heterosexual disagrees with the behavior, that person's dignity is suddenly denigrated and they are yelled at for being homophobic.

What we are seeing today is sexual liberty before religious liberty. Christians are being forced to violate their faith, something Williams doesn't seem to care about. It is not just religious freedom but freedom of speech that is being threatened as well.

Williams lost the plot and his beloved Church of England is fast going out of business with little more than one million out of 60 million Brits deigning to darken the doors of a church on any given Sunday. He thinks that because society has changed, the church's attitude towards homosexuality Christians should change to. He lives in the fantasy world that this will suddenly fill churches. It won't. It didn't happen in The Episcopal Church and it won't happen in the Church of England.

He pleads for gays even as they intimidate anyone who reproaches them for their behavior. He should be pleading for their repentance. He should have upheld the Biblical proscription on any form of sex outside of marriage between a man and a woman. He didn't. So now the flame of Anglicanism burns low to the point of being almost extinguished in the West and North even as it glows and grows more brightly in the Global South and for that Rowan Williams must bear a huge amount of responsibility and for which he must one day answer to a higher court.

END

ELCA Dealing with Student Loan Debt - Perhaps Just Propping Up Failing Seminaries.
LCMS Starting To Realize Their Fraud and Deceit



ELCA NEWS SERVICE
October 9, 2013
     ITASCA, Ill. (ELCA) -- As part of its commitment to supporting seminary students preparing for ministry, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) -- through ELCA Fund for Leaders -- has awarded scholarships to 21 students attending the eight ELCA seminaries for the 2013-2014 academic year.
     “What this means is that we are helping our future leaders start their ministerial careers with healthier financial realities that allow for creativity, generosity and spirit-led discernment,” said Rachel Wind, director for ELCA Fund for Leaders -- an ELCA initiative to build an endowed scholarship resource to provide tuition assistance for qualified candidates studying at ELCA seminaries.
     Wind made her comments at an Oct. 4 banquet to honor 16 first-year seminarians who received full-tuition scholarships through ELCA Fund for Leaders, and five seminarians who received mission developer scholarships through the Mission Investment Fund, the ELCA’s financial ministry.
     “It always is an amazing evening,” said ELCA Presiding Bishop Mark S. Hanson of the annual banquet attended by the ELCA Conference of Bishops, synod vice presidents, seminary presidents, churchwide ministries’ leaders, donors and supporters. The Rev. Elizabeth A. Eaton, who was installed Oct. 5 as ELCA presiding bishop, also attended the banquet. She assumes the post Nov. 1.
     Hanson reflected on Luke 10, when Jesus sent out his disciples. “And tonight we have 21 who said, ‘OK,’” he said.
     Students receiving full-tuition scholarships are:
+ Kelsey Fitting, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Gettysburg, Gettysburg, Pa.
+ Kathryn Jacob, Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago
+ Joshua Kestner, Luther Seminary, St. Paul, Minn.
+ William Layton, Wartburg Theological Seminary, Dubuque, Iowa
+ Michael Lengel, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Gettysburg
+ Chelsea Marsh, Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary, Columbia, S.C.
+ Alyssa Mazzei, Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary
+ Jennifer Michael, Wartburg Theological Seminary
+ Trena Montgomery, The Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia
+ Jessica Obrecht, Trinity Lutheran Seminary, Columbus, Ohio
+ Julie Patten, Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary, Berkeley, Calif.
+ Joel Rothe, Trinity Lutheran Seminary
+ Erika Spaet, Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary
+ Elise Tweten, Luther Seminary
+ Rebecca Wicker, The Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia
+ Matthew Zemanick, Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago
     Students receiving mission developer scholarships are:
+ Erin Armstrong, Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary
+ Nathaniel Bothwell, Wartburg Theological Seminary
+ Mytch Dorvilier, Wartburg Theological Seminary
+ Raymond Kolison, The Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia
+ Dan Nelson, Luther Seminary
     ELCA Fund for Leaders continues to grow with new scholarships being created every year, said Christina Jackson-Skelton, executive director for Mission Advancement, ELCA churchwide ministries.
     Among donors present at the banquet, Jackson-Skelton thanked Omer G. Voss Jr., Kenneth and Sandra Falkinham, and Jonathan Strandjord, who “have given generously of your treasure and are responsible for the strong foundation this fund is built upon.”
     She also recognized David and Barbara Swartling, who have established a scholarship fund to support qualified female candidates from ELCA Regions 1 or 2. Swartling has served as ELCA secretary for the past six years.
     Jackson-Skelton also acknowledged two new synodical endowments created since 2012 at the ELCA Northeastern Pennsylvania Synod and ELCA Virginia Synod. “Thank you for creating an environment in your synods that is conducive to gifts like these,” she said. “Your partnership in lifting up the ELCA Fund for Leaders makes all the difference.”
     This academic year, the ELCA Fund for Leaders as a whole will support 224 students studying at all eight ELCA seminaries, distributing around $1.4 million. Some 107 students are receiving full, half or partial tuition scholarships from the general ELCA Fund for Leaders, and 122 students are receiving scholarships of varying amounts from 41 ELCA synod partners.
     In 2012, seminarians who received ELCA Fund for Leaders scholarships totaling $20,000 or more carried a median educational debt of around $17,000 at graduation, compared to $34,500 for those not receiving ELCA Fund for Leaders scholarships.
      ELCA Fund for Leaders began in 2000 with the intention of helping to support seminary students complete their studies without taking on a sizeable debt load that has become the norm.
     “This debt was disturbing because the average salary of a pastor was nowhere near the amount necessary to responsibly pay off these debts while maintaining healthy financial well-being,” Wind said.
     The long-term goal of the endowed fund is to one day support every qualified candidate attending an ELCA seminary.
     “With these scholarships this church is making a commitment to you, saying that we believe you will do great things in your lives of ministry, and we are excited to watch how the spirit moves in your vocations,” Wind said.
     “You are the visionaries, poised to make the vision of Christ’s abiding love plain for the world,” she said. “We can hardly wait to see what the future holds.”
     Information about the ELCA Fund for Leaders is available athttp://www.ELCA.org/fundforleaders.

How much did McCain pay for seminary?
How much does he make now?
LCMS pastoral education is as expensive as Yale,
as doctrinal as ELCA.
Hoot of the Day

At the installation of Presiding Bishop Elizabeth Eaton,
Bishop Jessica Crist gave the sermon, ending, 

 “Whoever has ears to hear, let them hear,” she said. “So, go, sow! Sow! Go!”
ELCA did not provide a pronunciation guide in their news release.

ELDONA Justification Theses 9 and 10.
Apparent Warnings Against Canonizing Essays

Andreae is the man who initiated the Book of Concord,
so his statement might be worth considering over that
of Richard Jungkuntz, the WELS founder of the first
Lutheran seminary for homosexual clergy - Seminex.


Thesis 9
It must always be remembered that something may be acceptable as a homiletical/rhetorical device that
is inappropriate if passed off as exegesis—and completely improper if asserted as doctrine. As we are
warned not to push a parable beyond its point/ground of comparison, even more we must remember that
every illustration or analogy developed by Man will fall short and, while it may be helpful pedagogically,
such language must not be made into a necessary part of our confession.

Thesis 10
In a similar fashion, we must make a distinction between an exegetical conclusion (no matter how
sound) and a direct statement by the Lord in His Word. This need for a distinction is not to lessen the
authority of an article that is arrived at by reasoning from the Scriptures (e.g., the article of the Holy and
Blessed God as Triune), but to keep from misstating how the article is taught in God’s Word and, possibly,
becoming guilty of putting words into the Lord’s mouth that He has not Himself given us and coming
under His proper condemnation for so doing (“I am against the prophets,” says the Lord, “who use
their own tongues but say, ‘He says,’” Jeremiah 23:31).15

15 “Scripture teaches” has a different impact, breeds a different expectation, and requires a different method of establishment from “God says.” Scripture teaches that God is Triune, but it never says that He is.

***

GJ - These two statements parallel what I have written about pixelation - when someone takes part of a verse and expands a few words to make them the filter by which all Scripture is interpreted. Good examples are the Synodical Conference shibboleths -

  • "Romans 4:25!" and "Raised for our justification!" and "John 1:29!"  and 
  • "Who takes away the sins of the world," 


which are seldom heard lately.

Romans 4:25 utterly fails to support UOJ because Romans 4:24 is so clearly a justification by faith verse.

KJV Romans 4:24 But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on Him that raised up Jesus 
our Lord from the dead; 25 Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.

Moreover, the context of Romans 4 alone (not to mention Romans 3 and 5) shows that Abraham is the primary example of justification by faith apart from the works of the Law - or any works. That was central to Paul's argument that Gospel preaching does not require the prerequisite of kosher traditions. That point was earlier made in Galatians.

The John 1:29 citation is ridiculous to use for Unversalism, because the verse is another teaching of the atonement, Christ dying for the sins of the whole world. The UOJ philosophers want to make this rationalistic excursion: "If Christ died for the sins of the world, then the entire world has been pronounced righteous, free of sin, and saved." The same style of rationalism has solemnly declared, abusing the Word, "If Christ has two natures, He must be two people. Therefore, He must either be fully human or fully divine."

And what is the name of this article -
The Righteousness of Unfaith?
The Righteousness of Subjective Justification?
No - the title is too plain, too simple to repeat such UOJ absurdities,
so the UOJ Hive ignores it entirely.


A correction to the John 1:29 aberration has been available since the Reformation, since Luther's Galatians Commentary deals with this verses in one of the Reformer's most eloquent essays. Nota bene, readers - the Book of Concord commends that commentary for additional study of justification by faith.

To say a church body is "confessional Lutheran" and "orthodox Lutheran" while abusing John 1:29 is the nadir of false doctrine, a sniveling crawling away from the Gospel in the name of the Gospel.

Those who want to discuss justification without reading the Galatians Commentary, underlining and studying those clear expositions of the Gospel, should be baited with dogs, driven out of town, and pelted with manure, as we confess in the Book of Concord. But no - they are the SynCon seminary professors, the DPs and SPs, the synod minders in each parish, hyper-aware of anyone departing from the settled doctrine of Enthusiasm. "I am surprised that you have departed from the clear teaching of our Holy Mother Synod." That alone should send someone into exile - because anything said after that warning is clearly an appeal to the infallibility of a man-made organization.

The Synodical Conference is not crumbling. It has already crumbled. The foundation was undermined by the triumph of the Brief Statement of 1932, constantly elevated by the apostates since that time. No one dares question a syllable of that political document.

"Every sinner righteous" is UOJ code for
justification without faith, absolution of the world,
but Jungkuntz, a Seminex leader, was careful to make this
clear to to everyone.
There are two remedies for the production of false doctrine in the LCMS, WELS, and Little Sect on the Prairie. I will not even name the micro-mini fragments of the Synodical Conference, since they seem to concentrate and promote the worst sins of their diseased parents.

Remedy 1 - Luther's Sermons and Books
The greatest Biblical expositor is Martin Luther. By studying Luther's sermons and books,  we learn to see the entire Bible as one, united truth, the Book of the Holy Spirit.

Remedy 2 - The Augsburg Confession and Apology
So you guys want to cited "forensic justification" and Robert Preus. I heard Preus say, answering my question, that Melanchthon was indeed the pioneer of  forensic justification. Moreover, Luther considered himself a "theologian of the Augsburg Confession," and the Concord editors joined him in that self-identification.

If you guys insist must call upon forensic justification (to hide your actual dogma) and use the Confessions to dazzle the illiterate, then start with Articles IV and V of the Augsburg Confession and a careful study of Melanchthon's elegant essay on justification by faith in the Apology.

The audience - or rather, victims - of these jackasses will have to hold up their insights from Luther and the Book of Concord as a way to discern any truth in the braying of these beasts.

As Luther said - no one's faith will save you - not even the faith of Jesus. Holy Mother Synod has no faith - it has buildings, rubles, and dark secrets, but no faith. This faith in the Gospel of Christ must be our own, and it can only be sustained and strengthened by the Means of Grace and the cross.

Forensic Justification
This term is properly used for the language of the courtroom, that man is a sinner but because of faith in Christ, God declares him righteous.

The UOJ buffoons turn this around and claim that God has declared the entire world forgiven, righteous, and saved - without faith. Their language comes from Samuel Huber, who was driven from the Wittenberg faculty, post-Concord, for his false doctrine. As I recall, he accused his justification-by-faith opponents of being Calvinists. Sound like the Wilken-McCain faction?



Links to the individual ELDONA Justification by Faith Posts.