Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Does the Eighth Commandment Protect Those Who Ape a Gay Video?
What About Failing Rock WELS Churches?




Now someone is emulating and naming the Fire Island and MLC videos, associating them with each other. That is a lot of free publicity for a tiny WELS college.

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WELS GA Personality":

What do you think about the eight commandment? There is a whole lot of slander on this blog directed towards WELS, MLC, Called Workers and their families.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Say It Ain't So, Joe - Krohn Rock Group Dumped at ...":

The hatred and slander on this site makes me sick. There is no excuse for this, especially coming from Christian men and women.

---

Blake has left a new comment on your post "Mary Lou College's Own Flock of Seagulls--or--Girl...":

At first I thought this video was fairly immature yet mostly harmless. However, Mr. Jackson, now that I've compared it to your clearly blameless and omnibenevolent soul, it truly disgusts me. Thank you for opening my eyes.

P.S. How about this for comment anonymity?

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Mary Lou College's Own Flock of Seagulls--or--Girl...":

Correct me if I'm wrong, and I know I'm not wrong since I am a student at MLC, but I do believe MLC stands for Martin Luther College, not Mary Lou College. Some "pious" man you are pointing out the "sins" of others when you yourself are breaking the 8th commandment by bearing false testimony against your neighbor by not taking their actions in the kindest possible way. You are also slandering a man's name by not correctly given him credit as the name holder of a respectable college in the United States. Instead you use your close-mindedness to slander a man's name, and also the reputation of the gentleman in the movie. Who are you to publicly hold false testimony against the gentleman in this movie? I also know that everyone in this video has or have a steady relationship with a member of the OPPOSITE sex. If this video is really the biggest problem we have facing us, then we are surely blessed. But the fact of the matter is that it is not. I do believe you are missing the plank in your own eye but not seeing how your comments and your promotion to negative comments are directly affecting how these young men are seen by people who do not know them personally. Just because you have a problem with the WELS does not give you the divine authority to judge a man's heart or a man's intentions. Perhaps we might construct our time in a better fashion than to read a blog that diminishes the reputations of young men and encourages judgement on others? Just a thought I suppose.

***

GJ - I give various institutions a nickname. I have trouble associating the Reformer's name with a blatantly Church Shrinker school, even more so when an atrocious video is uploaded to a world-wide server and students are shocked to find people watching it. Did everyone just fall off the beet wagon before signing up for college?

Why has the college done nothing about it?

Why is the video still playing as of this posting?

The Miley Cyrus video is painfully bad, but innocuous. Has Disney given MLC permission to use her music? There are legal issues which WELS pastors constantly ignore when they offer up their sermons as original when those efforts are nothing more than copies from the false teachers they adore and follow. Names? Parlow. Kelm. Doebler. Ski.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "More Cluelessness and WELS Grammar:Girls Just Wann...":

Well, your so-called entertainment has done serious damage to the reputation of these students and MLC in general. I hope it was worth it.

I'm not arguing that it should or should not have damaged these reputations. I am only saying that it did. Think before you act; consider all the possible consequences.<==Good advice for MLS students.



***


GJ - Now that is a typical WELS apostate response. Any attempt at correction is met by accusations of a horrible sin being committed - by the innocent. By the way, someone with long-standing WELS credentials pointed out the video to me. He was too disgusted to watch more than one minute of "Party in the MLC.'

I posted the code for the video MLC is still showing. Yes, I know, it is not an official MLC video. To find it on YouTube, search "Party in the MLC." That would strike the average person as an official, approved video from the college.


One defense of the video is--believe it or not--the gay group loved the MLC version, and of course Miley loved the FIP version. But FIP stands for Fire Island Pines - the gay resort where the original Miley satire was filmed. Is that something to brag about?


Don't worry about the hi-larious MLC video being taken down. It can be hosted somewhere else, like the original one here, thanks to New York Magazine.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Mary Lou College's Own Flock of Seagulls--or--Girl...":

I am a current MLC student, and in stereotypical WELS style, I feel the need to place my two mites(<--Bible reference) in the offering plate, if you will. I realize that you will most likely not be swayed by my opinion, but hey, that didn't stop any of you.

Let's do a little review here, the thought is that the students featured in the video are giving the wrong impression of the WELS school of ministry. They created a parody video of a popular youtube video. Alright, we all still on the same page? good.

None of these men are homosexual. I know for a fact that at least more than half of them are currently or have been romantically involved with women. Also, if there was ever a question about their sexual orientation, it would have been handled by now not only by faculty of MLC, but also by the students because we know just as well as anyone that homosexuality is sinful and we know that we are told in the Bible to show our brother his sin.

Like I said before, the video is a parody, like Saturday Night Live. Some of the actors on SNL will impersonate homosexuals by dressing a certain way or giving themselves a lisp. Do people question the sexual orientation of the comedians on that show or others like it? No. This is the same situation. They are a group of blatantly heterosexual men who acted out of character for the sake of humor. Senator(at that time) Barack Obama went on the Late Show with David Letterman and presented the top 10 things he would change if he became president. In typical late night humor style, they were jokes, not real campaign promises he was making. So, just as we look at Barack Obama making jokes about his campaign on late night TV, let's look at the CONTEXT of this video before we make judgments on it. Realize that all of this(both Obama and MLC students) is relative humor, it's only funny because you know what the actors are like on a every-day basis and when they act out of character, it is funny.

In addition, you have to know the culture of MLC, or the average college in general. I will go out on a limb and assume that most of the people commenting on this blog are not of college age. That being said, most of you do not know what is considered funny or "cool" at MLC currently, so let's look at the culture of MLC.

Like I said before, Homosexuality is in no way condoned at MLC by students or faculty. But homosexuality is joked about because it is not even close to a possibility. In the same way we brush off comments like "We're gonna kill them" said by athletes, MLC students think of someone calling them "gay" or a "fag" as something so impossible that it does not bother them. Just like we know that LeBron James is not going to go out on the court and murder someone, we know as friends and brothers and sisters in Christ that if we are at MLC, homosexuality is most likely not a problem for us. And we know that we are not giving offense to anyone because they are not homosexual.

An Intelligent Comment--Oh, Oh--From Mankato

C.C.Baxter has left a new comment on your post "Does the Eighth Commandment Protect Those Who Ape ...":

context doesn't matter to the 13 year old who clicks and views "Party in the MLC". If that's their only viewpoint of what MLC is and stands for, which it probably would be, then that's bad. Fun video, but only for inner circles. We in the loop know they're not gay. It's the public that views it (and who certainly won't bother with context) that doesn't know.

As said before, there is one thing I whole-heartedly agree with: it being on youtube is a major step backward after Schroeder took on ELCA's homosexuality endorsement.

***

GJ - No one ever said the kids were a bunch of sodomites. The issue is - why would they take the time to imitate a famously gay video? Does that prove they are cool anti-Pietists?

More comments are arriving, taking issue with me. I am on trial now - typical WELS turnabout.

Another question to ask - is there any supervision at Mary Lou College? This video competition seems to have no rules, since the children involved posted their work to YouTube and left it there - 60,000 views, 80,000 views, and counting. If they had criticized the Shrinker movement in WELS, the video would have been de-rezzed in five minutes.



More Cluelessness and WELS Grammar:
Girls Just Wanna Have Fun






Jake Gawel has left a new comment on your post "Mary Lou College's Own Flock of Seagulls--or--Girl...":

If you have ever seen a Will Ferrell movie where he takes his shirt off, you should go pray the Rosary and ask the Lord and Mary to forgive your sins of homosexuality. If you can not see that this is an obvious social commentary and spoof to be taken lightly then you should not carry the right to vote in the US. There was no more nudity here than one would find at a public pool. Yes, these are indeed potential future called worker,(sic) but should they be punished for making a video where they imitate female celebrities and lip-sync? No. Anyone who has a problem with this video due to its relation to MLC needs to take a step back and realize that the motive was not evil. For the people who say they wouldn't want these young men as their pastors, I question how well you know them personally and how you can be a judge of their faith or character because they dressed up for fun. Thanks.
[Step One - Play the video as the WELS Connection.
Step Two - Pass the hat.
Any questions?]

---

MLC Student has left a new comment on your post "Mary Lou College's Own Flock of Seagulls--or--Girl...":

I've read every comment on this page and I have to say that many of them are highly insulting. I agree that the young men in the video were foolish for making this video and posting it. They committed a sin of offense and they should know better than that. They did not however, deliberately set out to hurt anyone.

Moreover, lumping every MLC student into the same category is ludicrous. Saying that "the academic focus is about as diverse as the House of Habsburg's DNA; the scholarly authenticity is a about as noble as a McDonald's Happy Meal." is insulting. MLC is a highly specialized school, yes, but because of that specialization, our focus is narrower and we learn more. Being an 'A' student isn't the easiest task in the world. We have to study and apply ourselves. We have some very tough classes.

Also, criticizing our Professors is below the belt. We have very knowledgeable, wise Professors. They dedicate a good portion of their lives to educating us in the best way that they can. Most of our professors go above and beyond what is expected of them. They are amazing men and women who work hard to help us transform from crazy, irresponsible kids into ministers of the gospel so that we can serve our future students and congregations as well as they have served us.

Lastly, we're college students. We can't study every moment of every day. We need a break every once in awhile. Any psychologist will confirm that having no 'play' time is bad for a person. All MLC students do not make foolish mistakes, but when we do so, we are only human. The law definitely should be used, but the law should be followed by the gospel. I am an MLC student who truly appreciates the education that she gets at MLC and who truly appreciates the lessons that she learns here. I am well educated, well prepared for my future ministry, and I will be a good teacher. Please think carefully before any of you discredit or slander MLC, our Professors, or the student body. The actions of a few do not dictate the actions of the whole.

---

Valerie Grundmeier has left a new comment on your post "MLC Video Comment - But Wait - Does Everyone Know ...":


I really enjoyed watching the "Party in the MLC" video, knowing that these boys created it for MLC students to watch. They then posted it on YouTube for their friends that couldn't be at the talent show that night, and their moms. ("Look, mom, how silly we are!") Those select few were their intended audience. If you aren't one of those people, you were never meant to see it.


For that reason, it is a shame that they posted it on YouTube for the whole world to see. They never expected that the whole world would! I do know that they intend to take it off YouTube shortly. Hopefully they will post it on Facebook, because it is a funny video. But they need to restrict the audience to their friends, fellow students, and family. After all, that audience is the only one which understands these boys and their beliefs (including recognizing homosexuality as a sin)! The comments on your blog posts have proven that all too well.


As for comments you have received which contain spelling errors and bad language, that is also a shame. Yet chances are I agree with some of those sentiments.


---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Say It Ain't So, Joe - Krohn Rock Group Dumped at ...":

Sir,
I'm not sure how to feel after visiting your site. It doesn't add up to me. You can't really believe that the majority of your posts are not sinful. You tear down young men who are preparing themselves for ministry because they are dancing and singing to a song, yet it is okay for you to paste pictures of our brothers' in Christ heads on the body of cartoons? Clearly that is not glorifying our Lord and Savior. You put pictures of people's families up on your website and mock them and slander their name.



Whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it ALL to the glory of God.

ALL sir, even your blog. I get you disagree, but surely there is a God-pleasing way to go about this.

---

GJ - At least I put my name on my messages.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Mary Lou College's Own Flock of Seagulls--or--Girl...":

Now, with those last two paragraphs already on the page, let's realize that it all goes back to what I said about relative humor. I can almost guarantee that those guys did not sit down with the intention of making fun of homosexuals or to "come out of the closet," but simply to provide the MLC student body with entertainment.

Alright, I'm almost done, but I wanted to let you in on some secrets... In talking with schoolmates the general consensus is "Why do all these people so uptight about this stuff?" Listen people, I don't know what you're trying to prove, but you aren't changing the humor at MLC. I will still walk into my room, see my roommate changing, and say something to the effect of "hey, sexy" to which he will probably respond, "shut up, queer." And then we will laugh and GO ON WITH OUR LIVES!! My next door neighbor will still walk with just short shorts and huge jersey on into a room of guys watching Monday Night Football and get a laugh. I'm not going to go to my basketball coach tonight and say "Coach, I don't feel comfortable playing physical defense or posting up because the guys might think I'm gay." Don't get me wrong, it's great that you care, but just let us deal with our own problems. I assure you that these guys are not gay, and that they did what they did purely for humor that was based on MLC's culture.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go snuggle with my girlfriend... and don't worry, I checked, she's definitely a girl.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "MLC Video Comment - But Wait - Does Everyone Know ...":

And this video looks like they made it for the same reason you write this blog- in the name of satire! The only difference is you think this blog is funny and the video is not because it was done by students at a school you don't like.

***

GJ - I like MLC but I cannot figure out students who are so slow that they upload a video for all the world to watch and complain about the results of their kelming, artistic dishonesty, and aping of sodomy. They can parlow all day long, but the readers--loud and proud straights--have spoken.

---

Whosit5Casie has left a new comment on your post "Mary Lou College's Own Flock of Seagulls--or--Girl...":

My name is Casie and i'm 19 and I don't go to MLC. Some of my friends do though...

I am WELS...and this entire thing made me laugh. it's all so typically WELS. the crazy kids' antics, the adults' overreaction to prove a point, the kids' friends' counter reaction...and what has been solved? nothing. i'm sure the blog's author doesn't give a crap what his opposition has said, and i'm sure that the kids will NEVER understand why he thinks it's such a big deal (i know i don't get it).

i think you should all stop throwing the Bible at each other (obviously you can find the passage you need to refute the other guy-we get it) and just act like the logical, intelligent Christians you are. or should be. whichever you prefer.

by the way...if you can't attach your name to a comment that you make here, you're not helping, because anonymity breeds hostility in the blogosphere and hostility is what we DON'T want in this conversation.

also, as an afterthought, a question for mr. blog man: what did you think would happen when you posted this? and how do you think the publicity is affecting the guys in the vid? lol, i'm sure they're not all lamenting the fact...they probably think this whole thing is funny too. just sayin'

hope every has a great night! :)

***

GJ - The MLC video is a totally awesome portrait of the Shrinker mindset. The Shrinkers first see something wildly popular, cool, and cutting edge. That makes them loathe the restrictions binding them so cruelly. So - they imitate what they envy, down to the smallest detail. Then their friends begin to attack anyone who dissents from their cloning attempt, excusing it as creative, out-of-the-box, reaching out, and exactly what WELS needs. But that is not enough. The friends also have to attack anyone who dares to question the latest copycat effort.

Legal liability question: did the kids obtain written permission from Disney to steal music protected by law? Did they consider MLC's liability for their theft?
Did their doting parents ask their erring children about drawing WELS into a potential lawsuit?

WELS athletes are absolved before, during, and after each incident. When Thundershorts was dean of NWC, there were two sets one rules: one for the athletes, another for everyone else. Nothing is different today. That is why WELS athletes end up in such scrapes. Like the professional athletes they can never be, they never imagine the consequences of their actions.

GA - Lives!
Tolja, Tolja, Tolja



Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WELS GA Personality":

It is absolutely true that GA still goes on underground, conducted by a few select Seniors against a few select Juniors [first year students]. Those Juniors are then instructed to select a few worthy candidates when they are seniors and to carry on the tradition underground, on a smaller scale. It is now in the deep shadows, and much smaller...but GA lives. I know. I saw it. Three years ago. I was there.

The "genius" of this system is that 90% of seminary students are left thinking that GA is in fact dead, because they are left out of it. So, 90% of recent graduates could say, without failing a lie detector test, "GA is dead." But they're just ignorant. It lives.

***

GJ - Habitual liars are going to stop? No, GA is based on deception so the falsehoods continue.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Clueless Anonymous Comments Are Still Posted - Lik...":

The spirit of GA is strong in the commenter who wrote that someone might not attend seminary because they are "fraid of being hazed." That's the standard line given by the pro-GA hazing crowd--that those who opt out of GA are weenies. It's similar to line about how those who don't like CG are lazy pastors not interested in outreach.

Others went to Bethany or another seminary not because they were scared, but because who'd want to join, or keep being a member of, an outfit that condoned and excused such inane practices that detracted from college and seminary education?

Elvis Dave Kehl Has Left the Building




Dave Kehl is no longer employed at The Love Shack. I heard he was going to Atonement. He was recently listed as having the new Adult/Youth discipleship call, so I am confused. Corrections are welcome.

Kehl was connected with the expensive Airport meeting, an orgy of Shrinker ideology. I wanted to back up my facts, as I always do, but that link on the WELS.net site is gone.

This just in...



The WELS AnswerMan is being replaced. That was my favorite springboard before WELS elected SP Schroeder and ruined the fun. AnswerMan was known for ridiculous responses and bad spelling.

Some DPs wanted AnswerMan banished earlier, but the State of Wisconsin DPs wanted the feature kept. You are wondering why, so I will tell you. AnswerMan favored the Shrinkers, so the Big Three liked having a backdoor response that countered sound Lutheran doctrine and practice.

AnswerMan came across as official WELS doctrine, so a Shrinker pastor could whip out the favorable responses and say, "Holy Mother WELS has spoken. Nyahh."

My intuition is that Father Hollywood's Girls Gone Wild column was the last straw.

One Shrinker is endlessly offended that Father Hollywood alluded to Monty Python, although the Shrinker seems to know his Python much better than most people. But the same person was not offended by women pretending to be pastors. Father Hollywood was appalled by the lame excuses posted by AnswerMan.

As the golden sun sinks slowly into White Fish Bay, we bid a fond adieu to AnswerMan, source of mirth and befuddlement.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Elvis Dave Kehl Has Left the Building":

Palace intrigue at the Love Shack continues unabated. The AnswerMan never could reign (sic) it in with his official WELS doctrine.


---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Elvis Dave Kehl Has Left the Building":

According to the latest call report, Dave Kehl accepted the call to Atonement and returned the call to serve as Adult/Youth Discipleship coordinator.

***

GJ - Kehl was deep into the Shrinker agenda. I will not quote another source, who said...

Not gonna do it.

Say It Ain't So, Joe - Krohn Rock Group Dumped at Christ the Rock Lutheran Church in Round Rock, Texas






Doebler's full-time assistant is no longer listed. Why do the Shrinker missions have full-time female assistants?


The famous Black Sox scandal has been remembered with a boy running up to Shoeless Jackson, saying tearfully, "Say it ain't so, Joe."

Now I hear from my vast network of informants that Joe Krohn's Rock N Roll group has been dumped from Rock N Roll Church. Why? His good buddy Kudu Don Patterson told Doebler to get better results. In spite of all the insights from Church and Change, plagiarized sermons, and grants from various places, Rock N Roll has only 30 attending church.

The Church from Scratch, now known as Rock and Roll, has obtained the services of Dave Bauer, Martin Luther College, to make the contemporary services even more contemptuous, or is that contemporary?

Bauer has been working with Pastor Rick in Corona, California. Pastor Rick is very big on Church and Change, Leonard Sweet. Not so big on Ichabod.

They still use the URL of http://www.churchfromscratch.net. Put that in your browser and you will get Christ the Rock. Old Scratch is a nickname for Satan. In modern lingo, scratch is money. Both are fitting, because this latest experiment is dependent on scratch - synod subsidies and foundation grants. They wanted $200,000 from the Antioch Foundation this year and got a measly $20,000.

Check out the Rock N Roll websty. Here are some clues:

Vision, Purpose, Process, and Values - "Centered on Christ, Living with Purpose." Doebler is probably influenced by Rick Warren and Purpose-Driven Pietism. The Pietists are always anxious to produce results in people through their cell groups.

Old Scratch has cell groups. The vision is pure Pietism. There is a little tilt toward Lutheran doctrine, but Doebler uses Word, Baptism, and "Holy Supper." The Reformed can tolerate the word baptism but they are allergic to Holy Communion. Best not offend those who deny the Real Presence.

The Conference of Pussycats met at Patterson's church to confirm the value and orthodoxy of Rock N Roll.  That is like the Federal Reserve folks meeting at Goldman Sachs to make sure everything is honest and above board.

---

JR has left a new comment on your post "Say It Ain't So, Joe - Krohn Rock Group Dumped at ...":

Allow me to speak in C&C terms: the product offered by Pastor Doebler is not selling. The same message of self-improvement can be had at any number of other mega-churches in the area that have bigger buildings, better music, and more programs. There needs to be a differentiating factor that compels people to go to CTR instead of Hyde Park or Shoreline.

Here's an idea: try preaching the Gospel and administering the Sacraments. It's so crazy it just might work!


Clueless Anonymous Comments Are Still Posted - Like These



Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "MLC Video Comment - But Wait - Does Everyone Know ...":

I find it interesting that you choose only to post those blog comments that only correlate your opinion. [GJ - Could you get a third only into this sentence?] Why not post all blog comments on the page in plain view for everyone to see? [GJ - Obscenities and cursing too?]

Also where has our sense of humor gone? Are we all suppose to be staunch German robots set in our ways? Last time I checked it's hard to reach out to non-Christians when you have a "better than thou" attitude. Congrats to these young men for having some fun and letting people see their fun side.


I can only think that this will make it that much easier for children and teens to approach them when they become pastors and teachers. The children won't view them only as stuck up, snobby pastors and teachers who are unapproachable. Instead this will keep these young men down to earth and in touch with the one thing the WELS needs to continue, the younger generation.

[GJ - Ye shall know them by their fruits.]

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "MLC Video Comment - But Wait - Does Everyone Know ...":

So wait, this guy thinks it's okay to like Monty Python, but not a Youtube video featuring a mockery of another Youtube video, of which there are thousands online? He didn't even do his initial research to find out that the video was inspired by the Party in the FIP video. This blog, and the people responding to its completely outrageous claims are nothing more than a bunch of gossiping old grannies. And gossip is a sin, in case you didn't know.

[GJ - Sodom and Gomorrah were full of gossip columnists sporting leather pants, spikey hair, and earrings - the real sin of Genesis 19.]

---

Anonymous
has left a new comment on your post "WELS GA Personality":

There really isn't GA at the seminary anymore. It was over at least 5 years ago. The administration was (rightfully) afraid of a lawsuit. The dean of students, at least in years past, addressed the seniors and explained that seriously, really, not a joke, they can't have GA, because it could lead to a lawsuit. It's kind of funny that GA is so ingrained in their minds that he has to be emphatic that he is not kidding. [GJ - Even stranger is his argument based on fearing a lawsuit. A better statement would be - GA was wrong, stupid, dishonest, sadistic, anti-Christian, and against the spirit of any seminary. But that would have offended James Paul Tiefel, former GA pope, who got GA going again when students did cancel it.]

It's been replaced by a new activity with a German name, which I can't recall at the moment. They still pretend that something is going to happen. For the first few weeks, the seniors and middlers don't talk to the juniors in the cafeteria, but that is as bad as it gets. A few weeks into school, the juniors are told to come to the dorm basement on a Thursday night. There is a speech about what used to happen in GA. It ends along the lines of, "but we can't do that anymore. Oh, it's time to go." A line of cars is waiting to drive the juniors to a mystery destination... for a moment they wonder what will happen... then they pull up to a local bar. They skip the chasing, swimming, or whatever used to happen, and instead go straight to drinking, the merits of which I reserve for the reader to judge. [GJ - I am not going to assume this is true, just because someone posted it. If it is, the seminary is still begging for a lawsuit, for felony stupidity, not to mention other legal vulnerabilities.]

The secret isn't tightly kept. Some students inform their friends in advance (I was warned by someone who knew I might not attend otherwise), but let the the more enthusiastic have their fun and pretend to be surprised. Then Friday afternoon there is a quirky-but-harmless scavenger-hunt type activity in the Milwaukee area, followed by a pig roast, a devotion, and a party with skits in the basement. There aren't negative consequences if you skip out. It's admittedly unusual for a seminary, but an improvement over GA.

Pastor Jackson, I understand your suspicion. Given the secretive nature of GA and the animosity of some towards you and your blog, I would be suspicious as well. I agree 100% with your assessment of GA. But please don't report that GA continues. They really have stopped. I feel bad about spoiling the fun for future classes, but I would hate to see a qualified young man shy away from WLS because he is afraid of being hazed. And that's what might happen if he stumbles across your blog. If he is worried about GA, he should call seminary president Wendland (whose phone number is available at the seminary website) and ask him about it. I'm sure he will be open about initiation with any concerned layperson or prospective student. WLS is the synod's school after all, so all WELS members have a right to know what's going on there. But GA has been over a while. Most WELS pastors have been through it, but each year that percentage will be smaller. I think it would be helpful for everyone if the rumors were finally put to rest. Yes, it was inappropriate and harmful, but the seminary has repented, in a manner of speaking; it's over now and time to move on. [GJ - Godly contrition is required - not "moving on."]

***

GJ - I repeated the claim that GA is over. However, I was also told otherwise, so I mentioned that as well. The spirit of GA permeates the Shrinker sub-class. Witness the decades old lie that there is no Church Growth Movement in WELS.

Someone perceptively wrote: "I think IJ Reily's comment about the severity of hazing is quite perceptive....

The bad thing is that the severity of hazing (at least in years gone by) can linger for many years. After all, you are only 13 or 14 years old when you are living away from home for extended time periods. While still a WELS member in "good standing", I will always be mistrustful of giving the WELS my unqualified devotion, support, or confidence.

I always thought these traditions developed and continued to exist in WELS prep schools for several reasons. One reason is as follows:

Imagine a family has 3 kids and 2 parents. The ratio of supervision is 2 to 3, or 66 percent

Now imagine a dorm full of minors, numbering about 140. Imagine there are only 2 or 3 tutors residing in that dorm. The ratio of supervision is now only 3 to 140, or 2 percent.

Quite a difference !!!

So, much like prisons have used the "trustee system" in which certain prisoners are given authority within the prison system, upperclassman are given (or were given) certain authority over the underclassmen.

Unfortunately, abuse in such a situation can often creep in. Few 16, 17 or 18 year olds have the maturity of using power wisely.

Here's a thought to keep you awake at night. Imagine if WELS had boarding school for middle school (6th through 8th grade) students!!!!

William Golding's "LORD OF THE FLIES" comes to mind."

Oversight by older students is a common feature of boarding schools. How this is handled is another question. 

I do post foolish comments from time to time. The Shrinkers started their own anonymous blogs but could not keep them going, for some reason. Ichabod is not a free ride for anyone with some free time and public library access. When the nastiest ones got their own blog going for a few weeks, they only published congratulatory comments from Shrinkers Tim Felt-needs and Joe Krohn, who were the only followers. They even eliminated a link to Thy Strong Word from a comment on the topic of UOJ! So they hauled out the Synodical Conference boilerplate claims about UOJ as their proof but would not link a scholarly book where all those claims were matched with the Scriptural and Confessional repudiation of forgiveness without faith.

UOJ is not only a product of Pietism. UOJ is also closely associated with anti-nomianism, lawless legalism, an obvious component of the old Synodical Conference and still in evidence today.

I want to add that some of the warmest, most Gospel-centered people I have known are WELS, pastors and laity alike. I realize people are struggling to overcome the errors of the past. For that reason I am glad to provide a podium for those people.

---
Fire Island Pines Video Inspires Future WELS Pastors


Party in the Fire Island Pines Video that inspired the MLC video.


Frazer Harrison/Getty Images Miley Cyrus in concert in Los Angeles.

Who says the Walt Disney Company doesn’t have a sense of humor?
Perhaps no star is more important to the media giant these days than Miley Cyrus, the 16-year-old “Hannah Montana” actress who also delivers hit movies, merchandising lines and albums. The already protective company is überprotective of her.

So when a video popped up on YouTube on Monday – depicting seven gay men in speedos cavorting on a beach to “Party in the USA,” Ms. Cyrus’s new single – Disney’s blood could easily have boiled. The upbeat video is G-rated, but a tad on the flamboyant side (writhing on the sand, a pool-dancing sequence).

“I assumed it would be taken down pretty much immediately, particularly because of the music rights issue,” said David Fudge, a 27-year-old marketing executive at Esquire who made the video, titled “Party in the Fire Island Pines.”

But Disney left the ditty alone and it soon exploded in an underground way, collecting 200,000 views in just three days. Disney employees started e-mailing it to each other, and before long Mr. Fudge’s office telephone rang. On the other end: Rich Ross, the president of Disney Channels Worldwide.
“I was like, who?” Mr. Fudge said. “He just said that he loved it and wanted to tell us that. He was extremely nice.”

Mr. Ross declined to comment, but another Disney executive noted that the video (and the reaction to it) demonstrated how Ms. Cyrus was broadening her fan base beyond little girls. Moreover, at a time of declining CD sales, even a teen queen like Ms. Cyrus needs all the attention for her songs that she can get. Her new album, “The Time of Our Lives,” arrives in Wal-Mart stores on Monday.
Ms. Cyrus herself is apparently a fan of Mr. Fudge’s work. Earlier this week, she wrote on Twitter: “I am OBSESSED with this video! Let’s make one!”

[GJ - Thanks to this video, Miley has moved her fan base from little princesses to young queens.]

Monday, October 26, 2009

WELS GA Personality





Nothing displays the GA personality of WELS better than the MLC video being defended.

I. Anyone who questions the video is a Pharisee, someone who needs to "get a life," and spend time on more important things.
II. The video was fun, an homage to another video , and a whole year has passed since the last obnoxious MLC video (statues fighting, cursing).

GA is the lowpoint of the WELS hazing tradition, which begins at the prep level. GA is secretive, promoting thuggish behavior in the name of creating unity. GA is based on deception, lying about it from the beginning. I hear two stories about GA:
1. GA is banished.
2. GA is still going on, secretly.

Yes, that sounds like GA. The old ritual was to call it off in public, debate having it, fooling the incoming class. Isn't lying fun?

Another essential characteristic of GA is arrested emotional development. I do not need to describe that, since the video is posted. Needless to say, many solemn WELS leaders turn into Max and Moritz the moment they relax. They are just joking. See, they are laughing. Ha ha. That was fun.

They like to yell Pharisee and legalist, but what better display of Pharisaical piety can one imagine than this video? They will develop into WELS leaders, always looking around as if someone just opened a pound of Limburger cheese. But in private! - whoopee!
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "MLC Video Comment - But Wait - Does Everyone Know ...":

In response to DK, my sentiments! I too shook my head and did not leave a comment on the earlier post. Copying gay and lesbian videos are we. I just viewed the FIP video one minute ago. If GJ is not going to discuss information that he found, then it can't be real good. I did not attend MLC. I got into the WELS back in 2001.(husband is a life long WELS) I teach children in Sunday School who will someday attend that school. I can be found in the company of MLC graduates on a daily basis. Could toss around some sir names, but I won't. What was their interest in FIP video to begin with?(probably something I would not want to discuss)The marriage bed is to be kept pure. God put Eve with Adam, not Steve. "New Ulm, We Have A Problem"!

from WELS church lady

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WELS GA Personality":

I think DK may have something here. I did not go to DMLC, but I knew plenty of classmates who did. Many of them went simply because they were pressured into going by the Lutheran high school, the DMLC recruiters, or their partents (or all three). Some went because they honestly had nowhere else to go and thought, "well, I guess I'll just be a teacher by default." Most of the people I knew who went to MLC under those pretenses have since droppd the teaching ministry.

---

Kenneth Schmidt has left a new comment on your post "WELS GA Personality":

No problem, DK. Apology unnecessary, but accepted. Its not always easy to know how academic authorities should handle undergrad excesses.

You are onto something about a Stockholm Syndrome-like issue at work here. I have also been thinking about the fact that most Lutheran pastors marry straight out of Seminary. These guys go from being under the thumb of their parents, to college life and then, usually, right into married life. There are some good things about this, but also costs. That very short time of freedom between living with one's parents and the onerous responsibilities of being married might tempt these fellows to perhaps over-romanticize their college days. This might be the cause of these odd tribal customs and folkways.

---

Michael Schottey has left a new comment on your post "WELS GA Personality":

After eight years in the prep/MLC system I don't remember GA. Perhaps I was brainwashed and can't remember it.

And perhaps all of my family and friends who have gone through the Seminary are just really good at lying to me.

***

GJ - GA is reserved exclusively for incoming students at The Sausage Factory. A reliable source says it is officially banned but secretly kept, apparently for a limited number of lucky victims.

Sunday, October 25, 2009

MLC Video Comment - But Wait - Does Everyone Know the Entire Concept Was Copied from Another Group?




Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Mary Lou College's Own Flock of Seagulls--or--Girls Gone Wild...":

I suppose one could chalk it up to "college humor" and call it quits. But there is an element of mean-spirited sarcasm and deprecation be it the older NWC or current MLC variety. If one has ever been on the receiving end or seen someone on the receiving end of the supposedly "just done in jest" remarks, one can but cringe at the snarky jokes, skits, etc. One would hope most have moved beyond that. It's pathetic when it doesn't happen. The pattern, once ingrained, rears its ugly head again and again. In WELSdom, it's so difficult to tackle an issue objectively without someone interjecting a college-era assessment of so and so. Those off-hand remarks hijack the issue-at-hand and turn it into character defamation. The esoteric nature of the humor is pretty much lost on those outside the circle. Not that anybody really cares though. The circle is limited to start with. Grow up and leave the schoolboy ways behind.

***

GJ - The Shrinkers in WELS are thin-skinned but really caustic in their "just joking" comments. Someone anonymously claimed I ruined the reputations of these kids by embedding their video. They produced the video, recording it without any suggestions from me, and--behold--posted the video to YouTube for all the world to watch and enjoy.

Here is the real scandal - the entire video is a bad copycat version of Party in the FIP, which has 2 million views. I stumbled on it while looking for more information on the MLC one. I will embed the code for both.



nycfudge
August 24, 2009


Music Video to Miley Cyrus' "Party in the USA" Filmed with my Flip Video mino HD
Music Video to Miley Cyrus' "Party in the USA"

Filmed with my Flip Video mino HD
Category: Music



beilke22
October 07, 2009

http://tinyurl.com/yhgwql7 This is our dorm video for Summit dorm at MLC, Homecoming 2009. Thanks to the fellas of FIP for the inspiration. [Inspiration? Intellectual theft with a vague reference is not inspiration.]


So we have a real hoot. The kids have shamed themselves, WELS, and MLC by stealing an original idea and presenting it as their own. I would say they had a great future ahead of them - except the Shrinkers are shrinking in number. They have hitched their wagons to a falling star.

I will let the readers compare the two versions.
---

DK has left a new comment on your post "MLC Video Comment - But Wait - Does Everyone Know ...":

Ok Professor

Let me apologize to you and others.

This completely changes it. I've commented regarding the video and I've criticized people who call this video a sin--I'd like to revise...Totally!

If the MLC video had been an original, not a parody of a video done by openly recognized homosexuals (filmed at a gay and lesbian resort), I would stand by my earlier opinion. In that case it would've just been a silly bunch of kids making fun of a song.

But as it is, I think the MLC students involved gave a whole lot of credence to the homosexual lifestyle. Seeing the original video makes me wonder if some of the MLC students are gay themselves. I mean, I'm pretty sure their (sic) not, but I think it's logical for an observer to wonder.

I know I was defending their actions as "childish but not wrong" but seeing the gay video made me do a 180--they've undeniably associated themselves to gay culture. I believe that making the video was wrong, and the fact that they called it "Party in the MLC" annihilates MLC's credibility as a religious school. In fact I think I might be writing the Dean of Students at MLC.

Why shouldn't these students be expelled?

If this is not (in essence) a public statement by certain future WELS pastors and teachers that homosexuality is a laughing matter, then what would it take?? And if MLC doesn't discipline those students isn't it reasonable to believe that MLC is officially permissive of gayness?

I'm very sorry that I didn't look into the issue further before forming an opinion and criticizing people as too stringent.

***

GJ - Your apology is accepted. Now MLC should apologize to WELS. Not long ago SP Schroeder took on ELCA for its endorsement of homosexuality. This video is certainly a backwards step. I had more information about the original FIP video, once I found it, but that information was not something I wanted to discuss.


I do not find the MLC copy-cat version cool, funny, or creative. True, it is even worse when the original is viewed. The MLC video is worse in several respects. The crotch-grabber would qualify in many communities as cause for arrest for public indecency. Does MLC have any standards at all? Wait, I remember - their favorite keynote speaker is Paul Calvin Kelm. Doctrinal apostasy always bears fruit.

Girls Gone Wild - Not About the MLC Video

The original Girls Gone Wild is here.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Father Hollywood <==Mequon grads, left click for source. Thnx.


Girls Gone Wild, WELS Edition


In spite of the Wisconsin Synod's reputation for "conservative" rigor, WELS has a rather "liberal" view when it comes to women officiating at the Eucharist.

According to this Q&A from the WELS's own website, there have been at least two instances where laywomen in the WELS have said the Lord' Words of Institution over bread and wine and served it, claiming that it was the body and blood of the Lord. The practice was in no way condemned by the WELS hierarchy, but rather, the practice is current under a "moratorium" in order to "keep from offending our brothers."

This error has come about by the intersection of an error on the doctrine of the ministry combined with a legalistic view of the role of women.

First, WELS does not believe the pastoral office has been divinely established, and further teaches that "The Bible establishes all of public gospel ministry but does not establish a pastoral office as such or vest certain duties exclusive to that office" (Emphasis added).

From this starting point, WELS adds the next premise that the differences between male and female are limited to a legalistic "thou shalt not," as the article puts it:

"Since the Bible does not assign specific duties to the pastor, WELS approaches the matter of women communing women from Scripture's man and women role relationship principle. WELS doctrinal statements on the role of man and woman say that a woman may have any part in public ministry that does not assume teaching authority over a man. That, of course, would include women communing women" (emphasis added).
And this has moved beyond the theoretical into the practical:
"WELS has had only two instances of women communing women, and our Conference of Presidents has since issued an indefinite moratorium on such practice to keep from offending our brothers until the matter is mutually resolved" (emphasis added).

The "it's only happened twice" defense reminds me of the Monty Python sketch claiming that the British Navy now has cannibalism "relatively under control."
[GJ - Note that Father Hollywood wrote this column, which I have quoted verbatim. If you want to condemn him for making a Monty Python comparison, contact him and leave your real name.]

In other words, the theology of male and female boils down to an oversimplified and law-based overarching principle that women are free to do anything and everything in the Lord's economy so long as she does not exercise authority over a man in doing so - when in fact, the role of women is much richer than the "anything other than..." approach of the WELS. Accepting these two premises and following them to their logical end yields the result of women saying the Words of Institution over bread and wine, and distributing the elements to each other as if they were the true body and blood.

This is roughly the equivalent of my asserting that since I'm an American citizen, I can sign my name on a bill and make it a law, or that I can authorize people to go up into the Statue of Liberty's crown, or may indeed put stars on my lapels and order military personnel about. I can do no such thing. It is a matter of authority. Pastors are ambassadors of Christ, and speak by His authority, standing in His stead and by His command. The American ambassador to Canada speaks with the authority of the government of the United States. Of course, I am free to visit the Parliament in Ottawa, but unlike the word of the ambassador, my word bears no authority. Any statements I make have no force behind them, as I have not been placed into any such office by those who have such authority to delegate.

This is quite different than the Roman Catholic assertion that at a man's ordination, a metaphysical change in his person has happened. But this is also quite different than the Protestant assertion that ordination is nothing more than a quaint ceremony. Sometimes the president of the United States is called "the most powerful man in the world." Not so. I'd be willing to wager than any middle linebacker in the NFL could take out President Obama in any kind of a strength competition or fight. What the president has is not personal "power," but rather delegated personal "authority" that he exercises "by virtue of his office." Not even someone more "powerful" than the president can make laws and issue commands to the military. If someone were to attempt to do so lacking authority, it would be a mutiny and a rebellion.

The examples in Scripture of those who assumed and usurped authority not given by the Lord do not end well. Korah's rebellion comes to mind.

And lest we become too smug in the LCMS, I think we should be on guard. We do have deaconesses who are described as "ministers," some even serving in institutional chaplaincies, providing spiritual care to both men and women. I have even seen this work described as being "pastoral" - though there is great care not to turn this adjective into a noun. At some point, the earlier understanding that deaconesses would only teach women and children has been superseded in the LCMS, as deaconesses are now permitted to teach men as well as women and children. What authority they have and do not have seems to be on a sliding scale of gray, and varies with whomever is asked.

But the problem goes well beyond the malleable role of the deaconess. I recently heard firsthand of a "laying on of hands" in the LCMS that involved not only clergy, but the congregational elders (after all, see 1 Tim 4:4...) and the female congregational president as well. I know that sometimes clergy wives are even involved in these ceremonials.

We also have an oxymoronic "office" in the LCMS called "lay minister." Male "lay ministers" have been given "license" for "Word and Sacrament ministry" by district presidents. Female "lay ministers" take the same classes and hold the same synodical designation, yet (to my knowledge) there have not been instances of female "lay ministers" either preaching or presiding over an alleged Sacrament of the Altar. But I do think this toe-to-the-line of the Wisconsonian view of the office of the ministry and the roles of the sexes leaves the possibility open.

One of the most foolish things anyone can ever say is: "It can't happen here."

We in the LCMS have a similar rather limited theology of the sexes as the WELS. We tend to focus on the narrow and myopic legalistic issue of "what women are allowed, and are not allowed, to do" (functionalism) rather than the deeper and eternal issue of what men and women were created to do (ontology). Function ought to flow from ontology rather than trying to reverse-engineer the situation in the opposite direction.

I suspect there are some in our midst who indeed would make the argument that women have the divine authority to bless bread and wine (even as they have the power to physically say the words), that they can indeed also have the churchly permission ("call") to do so as long as no men take the "sacrament" from her hand, and so long as she does not lay claim to the title of "pastor." And there are some that will, no doubt, make a couple arguments in favor of women consecrating based on:

1) The charge of "Donatism." This is the ancient heresy that the validity of the sacrament is based on the moral standing of the officiant. However, sex has nothing to do with moral fitness. It is rather an ontological distinction. For example, men are not denied the privilege of carrying a child in the womb based on a moral reason, it's rather a question of reality and vocation. Just as a good and righteous American citizen can write his name at the end of a bill passed by Congress, the fact is that his righteous signature is not effective whereas that of even a wicked president is - by virtue of authority. A person's sex has nothing at all to do with Donatism.

In fact, the Donatism charge can even go the other way. For example, a very pious and morally upright lay woman can say all the right words over bread and wine without having any authority from God, neither from Scripture nor from the Church, and yet a wicked ordained male pastor with a valid call can do the same thing - and there is no doubt whatsoever of the validity of the sacraments he officiates over.

This is because the issue is authority, not moral fitness.

In fact, there was an interesting conversation between some LCMS seminary professors over this very issue. You can read the initial article about the "validity of churchly acts of ordained [sic] women" here and the rebuttal against the charge of "Neo-Donatism" here.

2) Emergency baptism. The argument goes that if women can "confect the sacrament," so to speak, regarding an emergency baptism, then it follows that she can similarly officiate over celebrations of the Holy Eucharist. But this is a leap of logic that presumes that all sacraments are equal and that we are not bound to any authority in these matters apart from our own modern whims. The crux of the matter is that emergency baptism is just that - a life and death situation. The Church has long established this form of Holy Baptism, and has never denied the fairer sex the extraordinary authority to administer the Holy Sacrament in matters of extremity. However, the same cannot be said for other sacramental and churchly acts. For there are no emergency marriages or confirmations or communions. Our confessions cite the scenario attributed to St. Augustine in which one dying man baptizes the other, and the newly-baptized administers the Sacrament of Holy Absolution to his fellow. There is no mention of any other sacrament or church rite. Most certainly there is no precedent for emergency lay Communion.

Just as female ordination inevitably leads to the blessing of same-sex marriages, I also believe that a functional view of the ministry inexorably leads to women functioning (if not outright claiming to be) pastors. Until we in the LCMS come to grips with the idea of ontology (both of ministers and of the sexes), we will continue to follow in the train of our conservative brethren, even though the tracks have taken a radical turn to the left.

HT: Dr. William J. Tighe

6 comments:


Rev. Eric J Brown said...
What would you say is the connection between "Authority" and Ontology? When I think of these issues, I tend to think of authority first (rather than ontology), but I would wager that there is a fine and strong connection. How might you describe it though?

Past Elder said...
This post has been removed by the author.

Past Elder said...
Interesting that when I was in WELS, it maintained the view of the OHM just as you describe, and saw LCMS as waffling on the authority thing by allowing women voters in congregations, which as far as I know are still not allowed in WELS. As I read and learned more, it was the view of the OHM that was one of three factors that led me to change synods, because, as you point out, without the OHM the rest of it surely follows at some point. (The other two factors, for anyone curious, were local matters and it seeming that almost every blogger I found who understood Lutheranism as I do was LCMS, including our host, though we may part ways re secular music and church polity.)

Father Hollywood said...
Dear Eric: I think authority flows from ontology. For example, the husband has authority in the family because of who he is ontologically - a man. The Lord orders authority in the family not in a functional way (the head of the household being determined by who happens to be functioning as the head on a particular day), but in an ontological way (by virtue of the husband's maleness).

Father Hollywood said...
Dear PE: I think the female suffrage was a case of the church imitating the world. I think it is an example of viewing the Kingdom of God in terms of "rights" instead of seeking ways to serve. This same impetus is what led to women's "ordination" among our former brethren. Sometimes I think the modern Church is embarrassed by looking different than the world.

Thomas Pietsch said...
Father Hollywood, I've been reading and enjoying your blog for some time now, but can't remember if I've ever commented. This post, however, has piqued my interest. I'm a vicar in the Lutheran Church of Australia by the way. I wonder whether Lutherans also believe in an ontological change that is effected at ordination. Just as a baptism changes our ontology, so too does ordination change the ontology of the pastor. We don't re-ordain. Here's Augustine: 'For the sacrament of baptism is what the person possesses who is baptized; and the sacrament of conferring baptism is what he possesses who is ordained. And as the baptized person, if he depart from the unity of the church, does not thereby lose the sacrament of baptism, so also he who is ordained, if he depart from the unity of the church, does not lose the sacrament of conferring baptism.' That said, Lutherans do emphasise that it is Christ who is the consecrator in a way that Roman Catholics do not. Can we have ontological/metaphysical change as well? Regarding the Donatism charge, I think it can be completely reversed. In the LCA a lay person can be commissioned for Word and sacrament ministry, but cannot be called 'Pastor' or vote at Pastors' Conference. It is regrettable, then, that the fault line between those ordained and those who are not comes down to a title and voting rights, and not the Word and sacraments that are the foundation of the office of ministry according to AC XIV. What therefore occurs is a distinction between consecrators of the eucharist - those who are 'Pastors' are those who are not - which is at the very heart of the Donatist controversy. I don't think I'm alone in saying that if I had the choice between going to a lay minister or an ordained pastor I would always choose the latter. So this practice encourage Donatism - distinguishing between eucharists according to the minister. Regarding your last point on the argument that comes from 'emergency baptism', I'm torn between two differing explanations of the tradition preventing 'emergency communion'. Gerhard wrote that holy communion is not 'especially necessary' for salvation as is baptism. Therefore an emergency situation cannot exist. Robert Jenson, on the other hand, thinks that holy communion is too important for an emergency celebration. He writes that while preaching is public and indiscriminate (anyone can receive it), and Baptism and Confession are private and discriminating (they do not directly involve the corporate community), the Eucharist is both discriminating and public. And so a celebration of the eucharist can only involve those publicly ordained into the public office. Communion belongs to the church, not to individuals. So there are two explanations for preventing emergency communion - one because of its lack of importance (to justification) and once because of its great importance (to ecclesiology)! Pax tecum

***

GJ - The only foothold that could be purchased on the rocky ground of WELS logic would be Luther's comment on women preaching to women (allowed). The modern equivalent would be women leading one another in Bible studies and devotions, at their meetings. However, Martin Luther College promoted the concept of women leading men in this area and actively persecuted traditional Lutherans who objected. WELS has defended women teaching men, sponsoring national conferences where that was initiated without bad consequences. One example was the Tiefel pan-denominational worship conference at Carthage (ELCA) College.

Norm Berg promoted open communion in mission congregations. One wit calls it "Don't ask, don't tell" open communion.

The divorced and remarried pastors are gonzo for women's rights, probably because second wifey insists on it.

When all the WELS leaders train at feminist Fuller and feminazi Willow Creek, the products are bound to reflect that education.

If the ELS Board of Doctrine got their chasubles in a bunch over women consecrating in WELS, why not address Church and Chicanery in the Little Sect on the Prairie? Why throw rocks across the ravine when the same ideology is nestled safely in the bosom of Minnesota?

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Girls Gone Wild - Not About the MLC Video":

Here are some quotes from Luther which speak to the subject of women's roles in the church.
http://www.angelfire.com/ny4/djw/LutherGenderMinistry.pdf

"Rather, priesthood and power have to be there first, brought from baptism and common to all Christians through the faith which builds them upon Christ the true high priest, as St. Peter says here. But to exercise such power and to put it to work is not every man’s business. Only he who is called by the common assembly, or the man representing the assembly’s order and will, does this work in the stead of and as the representative of the common assembly and power." Page 3, second full paragraph

"Mostly the functions of a priest are these: to teach, to preach and proclaim the Word of God, to baptize, to consecrate or administer the Eucharist, to bind and loose sins, to pray for others, to sacrifice, and to judge of all doctrine and spirits. Certainly these are splendid and royal duties. But the first and foremost of all on which everything else depends, is the teaching of the Word of God. For we teach with the Word, we consecrate with the Word, we bind and absolve sins by the Word, we baptize with the Word, we sacrifice with the Word, we judge all things by the Word. Therefore when we grant the Word to anyone, we cannot deny anything to him pertaining to the exercise of his priesthood." Page 7, first full paragraph

"Now you might say: “What kind of situation will arise if it is true that we are all priests and should all preach [1 Peter 2:5]? Should no distinction be made among the people, and should the women, too, be priests?” Answer: In the New Testament no priest has to be tonsured. Not that this is evil in itself, for one surely has the right to have the head shaved clean. But one should not make a distinction between those who do so and the common Christian. Faith cannot tolerate this. Thus those who are now called priests would all be laymen like the others, and only a few officiants would be elected by the congregation to do the preaching. Thus there is only an external difference because of the office to which one is called by the congregation. Before God, however, there is no distinction, and only a few are selected from the whole group to administer the office in the stead of the congregation. They all have the office, but nobody has any more authority than the other person has. Therefore nobody should come forward of his own accord and preach in the congregation. No, one person must be chosen from the whole group and appointed."Page 8, first full paragraph

"As St. Paul says in Gal. 3:28, you must pay no attention to distinctions when you want to look at Christians. You must not say: “This is a man or a woman; this is a servant or a master; this person is old or young.” They are all alike and only a spiritual people. Therefore they are all priests. All may proclaim God’s Word, except that, as St. Paul teaches in 1 Cor. 14:34, women should not speak in the congregation. They should let the men preach, because God commands them to be obedient to their husbands. God does not interfere with the arrangement. But he makes no distinction in the matter of authority." Page 8, first full paragraph

"But in the New Testament the Holy Spirit, speaking through St. Paul, ordained that women should be silent in the churches and assemblies [I Cor. 14:34], and said that this is the Lord’s commandment. Yet he knew that previously Joel [2:28 f.] had proclaimed that God would pour out his Spirit also on handmaidens. Furthermore, the four daughters of Philip prophesied (Acts 21[:9]). But in the congregations or churches where there is a ministry women are to be silent and not preach [I Tim. 2:12]. Otherwise they may pray, sing, praise, and say “Amen,” and read at home, teach one another, exhort, comfort, and interpret the Scriptures as best they can." Page 15, first paragraph

In Christ,
Brett Meyer

Reformation Sunday I




The Seven-Headed Luther is still used as a polemic against the Reformation, even though its lies have been repudiated by Catholics.



Reformation Sunday, I, October 25, 2009

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn #258 Lord of Our Life Herzliebster Jesus
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual Eph 5:15-21
The Gospel Matthew 22:1-14
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #370 My Hope Is Built Magdalen

God’s Purpose and Counsel

The Hymn #309 O Jesus Blessed Lord Old Hundredth
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #657 Beautiful Savior

KJV Ephesians 5:15 See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise, 16 Redeeming the time, because the days are evil. 17 Wherefore be ye not unwise, but understanding what the will of the Lord is. 18 And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit; 19 Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord; 20 Giving thanks always for all things unto God and the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ; 21 Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.

KJV Matthew 22:1 And Jesus answered and spake unto them again by parables, and said, 2 The kingdom of heaven is like unto a certain king, which made a marriage for his son, 3 And sent forth his servants to call them that were bidden to the wedding: and they would not come. 4 Again, he sent forth other servants, saying, Tell them which are bidden, Behold, I have prepared my dinner: my oxen and my fatlings are killed, and all things are ready: come unto the marriage. 5 But they made light of it, and went their ways, one to his farm, another to his merchandise: 6 And the remnant took his servants, and entreated them spitefully, and slew them. 7 But when the king heard thereof, he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city. 8 Then saith he to his servants, The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy. 9 Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage. 10 So those servants went out into the highways, and gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests. 11 And when the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment: 12 And he saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? And he was speechless. 13 Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 14 For many are called, but few are chosen.

Collect
Almighty and everlasting God, who by Thy Son hast promised us the forgiveness of sins, righteousness, and everlasting life: We beseech Thee, do Thou by Thy Holy Spirit so quicken our hearts that we in daily prayer may seek our help in Christ against all temptations, and, constantly believing His promise, obtain that for which we pray, and at last be saved, through Thy Son Jesus Christ, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

God’s Purpose and Counsel

Namely, that God in His purpose and counsel ordained [decreed]:
15] 1. That the human race is truly redeemed and reconciled with God through Christ, who, by His faultless [innocency] obedience, suffering, and death, has merited for us the righteousness which avails before God, and eternal life.
16] 2. That such merit and benefits of Christ shall be presented, offered, and distributed to us through His Word and Sacraments.
17] 3. That by His Holy Ghost, through the Word, when it is preached, heard, and pondered, He will be efficacious and active in us, convert hearts to true repentance, and preserve them in the true faith.
18] 4. That He will justify all those who in true repentance receive Christ by a true faith, and will receive them into grace, the adoption of sons, and the inheritance of eternal life.
19] 5. That He will also sanctify in love those who are thus justified, as St. Paul says, Eph. 1:4.
20] 6. That He also will protect them in their great weakness against the devil, the world, and the flesh, and rule and lead them in His ways, raise them again [place His hand beneath them], when they stumble, comfort them under the cross and in temptation, and preserve them [for life eternal].
21] 7. That He will also strengthen, increase, and support to the end the good work which He has begun in them, if they adhere to God's Word, pray diligently, abide in God's goodness [grace], and faithfully use the gifts received.
22] 8. That finally He will eternally save and glorify in life eternal those whom He has elected, called, and justified.
23] And [indeed] in this His counsel, purpose, and ordination God has prepared salvation not only in general, but has in grace considered and chosen to salvation each and every person of the elect who are to be saved through Christ, also ordained that in the way just mentioned He will, by His grace, gifts, and efficacy, bring them thereto [make them participants of eternal salvation], aid, promote, strengthen, and preserve them.
Election, Solid Declaration, Formula of Concord, Book of Concord

We are observing two consecutive Sundays for the Reformation, since so many Lutheran congregations refuse to honor the Reformation, calling it “Unity Sunday” and “Reconciliation Sunday.” We stopped at a Tulsa LCMS congregation for directions to the Aquarium, and they advertised a Unity Sunday coming up. I suggest calling it Friendship Sunday and inviting a Roman Catholic priest to preach. Wisconsin Lutheran College did that with Archbishop Weakland and a group of priests. When Roman leaders from around the world met for Vatican II, they affirmed all the glorious decrees of Vatican I, including the Infallibility of the Pope. Lutherans have back-pedaled from the Reformation while Catholics have increased the height, width, and depth of their apostasy.

The passage above, from the Formula of Concord, is a summary of the Biblical message. The New Testament contains many similar summaries. Confessions of faith are good to compare since they are saying – This is what the Word of God teaches. A confession is always secondary to the Scriptures, so we call our Book of Concord – the ruled norm, the norma normata, ruled by the Scriptures. The Word of God is the ruling norm – norma normans.

Namely, that God in His purpose and counsel ordained [decreed]:

15] 1. That the human race is truly redeemed and reconciled with God through Christ, who, by His faultless [innocency] obedience, suffering, and death, has merited for us the righteousness which avails before God, and eternal life.

This is a clear summary of the Atonement of Christ, using the Biblical words – redeemed and reconciled. God ordained this Atonement so that no one could ever question whether it was universal, applying to all people for all time, and objective – true whether anyone believes or not. The Atonement is not justification and was never taught as justification until the Pietists tried to merge Reformed doctrine with Lutheran doctrine and ended up with…Reformed doctrine. Some would say, “Why don’t the Reformed teach this combination now?” They do – only they call themselves Universalists and Unitarians. God has done everything so everyone is forgiven, they imagine. That is also what Universal Objective Justification teaches.

The Atonement is our comfort - that no sin is so great that we cannot be forgiven. The sin against the Holy Spirit is rejection of the Gospel at the point of death, because that is saying, “I do not need forgiveness through the merits of Christ.” Faith in Christ does indeed matter, as subsequent statements declare in the Formula of Concord.

But first, we need to know how the benefits of Christ’s death come to us:

16] 2. That such merit and benefits of Christ shall be presented, offered, and distributed to us through His Word and Sacraments.

This is a concise summary of the Means or Instruments of Grace. God ordained the Atonement as the ultimate sacrifice for the sins of man. He also bound Himself to the Word and Sacraments as the ways in which we would receive this forgiveness. As Luther said, and we confess – the Atonement is the great treasure of the Gospel. The Means of Grace are the Word and Sacraments, the Holy Spirit distributing this treasure to each one of us. We always know the source of forgiveness, and we know this is objectively true, not based on our feelings, virtue, or works.

Seeking forgiveness, we always know where forgiveness is found. The liturgical worship service, continued from Old Testament times, gives us an abundance of the Law and Gospel, so we acknowledge our need for our Savior and receive what He so abundantly offers.

17] 3. That by His Holy Ghost, through the Word, when it is preached, heard, and pondered, He will be efficacious and active in us, convert hearts to true repentance, and preserve them in the true faith.

The Formula of Concord was written after decades of attack from Roman Catholics and non-Lutheran Protestants. The Concordists’ battles with non-Lutheran Protestants included the Zwinglian influence from Switzerland and the Anabaptists in Germany, not to mention the first Unitarians (Poland). We generally say “the Reformed” but I want to emphasize that denials of the Means of Grace came in various disguises.

So the question comes up repeatedly: How do we know that forgiveness has come to us, that we are truly forgiven?

The Biblical answer is clear – The Holy Spirit is always effective (efficacious) in creating godly contrition in our hearts through the preaching of the Law. The Holy Spirit is also efficacious and active in us when the Gospel produces faith in the Savior and nurtures or preserves that faith.

Man is anxious and wants certainty in the effectiveness of his congregation or religious association. God’s Word says - faithfulness to the Scriptures is success; the steward of the mysteries of God has one requirement – that he be found faithful. When that is turned around and focused on numbers (budget and parking lot acreage), anxiety increases and no God-pleasing success is possible.

The Rock N Roll “Lutheran” sermon at the beginning of this year revealed this truth. The sermon noted the need to pray for more members, to invite more people, and to get a $200,000 grant for a worship leader. There was no need for doctrinal faithfulness and trust in God’s Word. Instead, the rock band was replaced with another group, to encourage visible success rather than Scriptural fidelity.

This shows the power of God’s Word, because apostasy leads to even more hardening of the heart. The final result is a blind rage that hates the truth and delivers people to eternal damnation, unless someone wakes them up with the true Gospel. One friend recently confessed that he was finally delivered from a Seeker Sensitive church, yet some Lutherans pursue that model as something good, because it promises results. The results are clear:

KJV 2 Thessalonians 2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

18] 4. That He will justify all those who in true repentance receive Christ by a true faith, and will receive them into grace, the adoption of sons, and the inheritance of eternal life.

The declaration of forgiveness (justification) is always associated with receiving Christ, His Promises, in faith. The distribution of the treasure is constant, in preaching and teaching, but not everyone trusts the Gospel. Some do trust the Gospel for years and decades, but lose that trust for various reasons (Parable of the Sower, Mark 4, Matthew 13). The truth of the Gospel does not depend on its reception, its outward success. The truth of the Gospel belongs to God and can never be altered in any way, no matter what man may say, declare, or confess.
Justification is not making a decision. The Holy Spirit changes our hearts through the Word to make us willing recipients of the Gospel, through the Law, and creates that faith to embrace the Gospel Promises.

We are not divine robots. We have the freedom to turn away from the truth and embrace falsehood. Many people fall for the vices of the world or the evil desires of the heart and corrupt their faith to the point of no return. Although godly contrition is always possible, even at the hour of death, many have deceived and blinded themselves to the point where they know nothing but the fear of death (Pope Pius 12, Paul Tilich). Truly, the last state is worst than the first. Some have fallen from the faith, denying God, and are more difficult to reach than the ordinary atheist. That is why atheist groups covet former clergy who love to say, “I used to be a conservative Lutheran minister.” Ah, what a prize, to have the scalp of Lutheran minister who deceived himself into defending Church Growth and fell into adultery. As Walther said, the loss of faith comes first. The outward carnal sins come along second.

19] 5. That He will also sanctify in love those who are thus justified, as St. Paul says, Eph. 1:4.
20] 6. That He also will protect them in their great weakness against the devil, the world, and the flesh, and rule and lead them in His ways, raise them again [place His hand beneath them], when they stumble, comfort them under the cross and in temptation, and preserve them [for life eternal].

God reaches out to give us the Law and Gospel, to convert us into believers, and make us members of His Kingdom. But He does not stop there. He makes us holy, giving us the righteousness of Christ, and causes the Gospel to produce the fruits of the Spirit in our lives. He continuously helps us and protects us against the snares of Satan, giving us comfort and strength in the midst of temptation. So God makes us part of His Kingdom and gives us willing hearts to enjoy the spiritual blessings of that Kingdom.

KJV Ephesians 5:15 but be filled with the Spirit; 19 Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord; 20 Giving thanks always for all things unto God and the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ; 21 Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.

Notice that the cross is included in this statement. Nothing is clearer than this – the cross always accompanies the Word, as it did with Christ and His apostles. If we do not take up the cross daily, we are not worthy to be His disciples, as Jesus admonishes us. Therefore, presenting the Theology of Glory to supplant the Theology of the Cross is a gross and carnal rejection of the Gospel itself. Telling people they will be more popular, relaxed, and wealthy because of the Gospel is a blatant seduction of the Old Adam in the listeners by the Old Adam in the minister. Gatherings to tickle the Old Adam are always going to be popular, as witnessed by various thriving institutions. But they do not advance the Kingdom of God. If the Old Adam is not converted, in the name of success religion, the church involved is worse than the most evil den of vice in the land, worse than the lowest crack-house, etc. Worse because the cross of Christ is rejected in the name of Christ. No greater blasphemy can be imagined.

And yet, conservative Lutherans gladly join in fellowship with Willow Creek Community Church, and brag about their membership on that odious website. I was there at Willow Creek and had to search out one instance of a cross in the building, finding one in the basement, but none outside or in the Sneaker Service entertainment area. Certainly not in their pricey Food Court.

22] 8. That finally He will eternally save and glorify in life eternal those whom He has elected, called, and justified.
23] And [indeed] in this His counsel, purpose, and ordination God has prepared salvation not only in general, but has in grace considered and chosen to salvation each and every person of the elect who are to be saved through Christ, also ordained that in the way just mentioned He will, by His grace, gifts, and efficacy, bring them thereto [make them participants of eternal salvation], aid, promote, strengthen, and preserve them.

God’s plan, so clearly revealed to us, is that He will give us the spiritual blessings of this life—with the cross—along with the blessings of eternal life. That means whoever believes can be assured that God has elected, called, and justified him in faith. We know the source and meaning of this great treasure so we return to this treasure in our poverty and weakness, confident in the power of the Gospel to restore us.

Quotations
"The modern radical spirit which would sweep away the Formula of Concord as a Confession of the Church, will not, in the end, be curbed, until it has swept away the Augsburg Confession, and the ancient Confessions of the Church--yea, not until it has crossed the borders of Scripture itself, and swept out of the Word whatsoever is not in accord with its own critical mode of thinking. The far-sighted rationalist theologian and Dresden court preacher, Ammon, grasped the logic of a mere spirit of progress, when he said: 'Experience teaches us that those who reject a Creed, will speedily reject the Scriptures themselves.'" Theodore E. Schmauk and C. Theodore Benze, The Confessional Principle and the Confessions, as Embodying the Evangelical Confession of the Christian Church, Philadelphia: General Council Publication Board, 1911, p. 685.

"Early in the morning it rises, sits upon a twig and sings a song it has learned, while it knows not where to obtain its food, and yet it is not worried as to where to get its breakfast. Later, when it is hungry, it flies away and seeks a grain of corn, where God stored one away for it, of which it never thought while singing, when it had cause enough to be anxious about its food. Ay, shame on you now, that the little birds are more pious and believing than you; they are happy and sing with joy and know not whether they have anything to eat." Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed. John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, V, p. 114. Matthew 6:24-34.

"Since now, in the sight of God and of all Christendom [the entire Church of Christ], we wish to testify to those now living and those who shall come after us that this declaration herewith presented concerning all the controverted articles aforementioned and explained, and no other, is our faith, doctrine, and confession, in which we are also willing, by God's grace, to appear with intrepid hearts before the judgment-seat of Jesus Christ, and give an account of it; and that we will neither privately nor publicly speak or write anything contrary to it, but, by the help of God's grace, intend to abide thereby: therefore, after mature deliberation, we have, in God's fear and with the invocation of His name, attached our signatures with our own hands."
Formula of Concord, SD, XII. #40. Other Factions and Sects. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 1103. Tappert, p. 636. Heiser, p. 296.

"The Lutheran Church is a doctrinal Church. She attaches supreme importance to pure doctrine. The preaching and teaching of God's pure Word is her central activity. Say the Confessors: 'The true adornment of the churches is godly, useful, and clear doctrine.' (Triglotta, p. 401)"
W. A. Baepler, "Doctrine, True and False," The Abiding Word, ed., Theodore Laetsch, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1946, II, p. 496.

"Let him therefore who is concerned about his life not be taken in by the friendliness of heretics to agree with their doctrine. Neither let him be offended at my faults, who am a teacher, but let him consider the doctrine itself." [Origen, Homily 7, on Ezekiel]
Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1971, I, p. 154.

"But now I ought not to quote the Nicean, nor you the Ariminensian Council, as if to judge beforehand. I will not be bound by the authority of this, nor you by the authority of that. On the authority of the Scriptures and not on any one's own, but on the common witnesses of both, let matter contend with matter, cause with cause, reason with reason." [Augustine, Contra Maximum, Book 3, chap. 14]
Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1971, I, p. 155.
"What is the reason for certainty in Christian doctrine?...7. the hatred of the devil over against this doctrine;
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith (1568), trans., Richard Dinda, Decatur: Repristination Press, 1994. p. 21.

"The worst of all is, that we must not only suffer shame, persecution and death; but that the world rejoices because of our great loss and misfortunes. This is indeed very hard and bitter. Sure it shall thus come to pass, for the world will rejoice when it goes ill with us; but this comfort we have that their joy shall not last long, and our sorrow shall be turned into eternal joy."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 80. Third Sunday after Easter John 16:16-23.

"For it is not possible for those not to be offended in Christ who walk by sight and feeling and do not adhere firmly to the Word."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, I, p. 23.

"Perhaps you look about and think: What, could so many people be wrong all at once? Beware, and do not let their number trouble you; hold fast to God's Word; He cannot deceive you, though all mankind be false, as indeed the Scriptures say, Psalm 116:11: 'All men are liars.'"
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, I, p. 416. Epiphany Matthew 2:1-12.

"It is true, the injury is not so glaring, and it appears to be much worse if a person's head is struck off, than if a false prophet or writer comes forward; but a false sermon, yea even a false word, which comes whirling along in God's name, will cut off a great number of souls, so that an entire city or country may fall under it."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, IV, p. 386. Twelfth Sunday after Trinity, Second Sermon Mark 7:31-37.

"Perhaps you look about and think: What, could so many people be wrong all at once? Beware, and do not let their number trouble you; hold fast to God's Word; He cannot deceive you, though all mankind be false, as indeed the Scriptures say, Psalm 116:11: 'All men are liars.'"
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, I, p. 416. Epiphany Matthew 2:1-12. Psalm 116:11.
"The doctrine may well be correctly taught by a person even though his life is evil. Bad doctrine is a thousand times more harmful than a bad life."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 846.

"All the others also say that they are teaching the Word of God. No devil, heretic, or sectarian spirit arises who says: I, the devil, or a heretic, am preaching my own views. On the contrary, all know how to say: This is not my doctrine; it is God's Word."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 640.

"Error and heresy must come into the world so that the elect may become approved and manifest. Their coming is in the best interests of Christians if they take the proper attitude toward it. St. Augustine, who certainly was sufficiently annoyed by wretched sectaries, says that when heresy and offense come, they produce much benefit in Christendom; for they Christians industriously to read Holy Scriptures and with diligence to pursue it and persevere in its study. Otherwise they might let it lie on the shelf, become very secure, and say: Why, God's Word and the text of Scripture are current and in our midst; it is not necessary for us to read Holy Scripture."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 639.

"The devil has the advantage of being able to find pupils for a doctrine or a dream no matter how absurd the doctrine or the dream may be. The more absurd it is the sooner he finds pupils."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 632. WLS #1940 Mark 7:31-37.

"However, if anything is undertaken against the Word, faith, and the honor of God, we are in no wise to preserve silence, are to bear it far less patiently. Then we should offer stubborn resistance."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, III, p. 1308. Sermon, 1523

"Hence everything here depends only upon this, that you rightly learn to look upon Christ according to the Word, and not according to your own thoughts and feelings, for human thoughts are frauds and lies, but His Word is true and cannot lie."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, IV, p. 92. Third Sunday after Trinity, Second Sermon Luke 15:1-10.

"This is going through closed doors, when He comes into the heart through the Word, not breaking nor displacing anything. For when the Word of God comes, it neither injures the conscience, nor deranges the understanding of the heart and the external senses; as the false teachers do who break all the doors and windows, breaking through like thieves, leaving nothing whole and undamaged, and perverting, falsifying and injuring all life, conscience, reason, and the senses. Christ does not do thus."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 355. First Sunday after Easter John 20:19-31.

"But when St. Peter stood up and preached, they made a mockery of it and considered the apostles drunken fools. When they had urged the Gospel a long time, they gathered together three thousand men and women. But what were they among so many? Yea, no one could discern that the Gospel had accomplished anything, for all things continued in the same state as before. No change was seen, and scarcely anyone knew that there were Christians there. And so it will be at all times."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 306. Easter Tuesday Luke 24:36-47.

"Be not worried because of this! for even though a man preach and continue in the Gospel for many years, he must still lament and say: Aye, no one will come, and all continue in their former state. Therefore you must not let that grieve or terrify you."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 305. Easter Tuesday Luke 24:36-47.

"He permits it to happen that many great saints err and stumble, in order that we may not trust in men, though they be many, great, and holy. We must be led to rely upon the Word that is sure and cannot deceive, as here these two men, and all the others afterward, were directed to the Scriptures."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 290. Easter Monday Luke 24:13-35.

"All preaching of sin and God's wrath is a preaching of the Law, no matter how or when it may be done. On the other hand, the Gospel is such preaching as sets forth and bestows nothing but grace and forgiveness in Christ. And yet it is true that the Apostles and preachers of the Gospel sanctioned the preaching of the Law, as Christ Himself did, and began with this in the case of those who had not yet acknowledged their sins and had felt no fear of God's anger."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, IV, p. 158. Fifth Sunday after Trinity Luke 5:1-11.

"You may tie a hog ever so well, but you cannot prevent it from grunting, until it is strangled and killed. Thus it is with the sins of the flesh."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 247. Easter, Second Sermon Mark 16:1-8.

"The Holy Spirit is given to none except to those who are in sorrow and fear; in them it produces good fruit. This gift is so precious and worthy that God does not cast it before dogs. Though the unrepentant discover it themselves, hearing it preached, they devour it and know not what they devour."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 281f. Pentecost Sunday John 14:23-31.

"Godly and believing persons know their sins; they bear all their punishment patiently, and are resigned to God's judgment without the least murmur; therefore, they are punished only bodily, and here in time, and their pain and suffering have an end. Unbelievers, however, since they are not conscious of their sins and transgressions, cannot bear God's punishment patiently, but they resent it and wish their life and works to go unpunished, yea, uncensured. Hence, their punishment and suffering are in body and soul, here in time, and last forever beyond this life."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 131. Fourth Sunday after Easter, Second Sermon John 16:5-15.

"Therefore the Holy Spirit rightly and justly convicts, as sinful and condemned, all who have not faith in Christ. For where this is wanting, other sins in abundance must follow: God is despised and hated, and the entire first table is treated with disobedience."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 141. Fourth Sunday after Easter, Third Sermon John 16:5-15.
"A hardened heart will not be instructed, no matter how plainly and clearly the truth is presented; but the faith of the righteous is strengthened when they see that the ground of their faith is right and good."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 157. Third Sunday in Lent Luke 11:14-23.

"Christ, in the saying we have quoted from Matthew (24:45), tells us further, the servant of the household should be not only faithful, but also wise, able to discern between the mysteries of God and the mysteries of the devil, that he may safely guard and keep himself and those committed to his care. For, as Paul says in 2 Corinthians 11:13-14, false apostles sometimes fashion themselves into true apostles of Christ, even as the devil transforms himself into an angel of light."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholaus Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VI, p. 77. Third Sunday in Advent, 1 Corinthians 4:1-5, Matthew 24:45; 2 Corinthians 11:13-14

"You cannot of a truth be for true doctrine without being unalterably opposed to false doctrine. There can be no 'positive theology' where the God-given negatives have been eliminated from the Decalog."
Norman A. Madson, Preaching to Preachers, Mankato: Lutheran Synod Book Company, 1952 Preface.
"...and Luther asked that his early writings be read 'with much charity,' since they were not yet entirely free from Romish errors."
Francis Pieper, Christian Dogmatics, 3 vols., trans., Walter W. F. Albrecht, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1950, I, p. 89. SL XIV, 439; also XIX, 293, 296

"When the time comes that the worldly shall gnash their teeth, they shall witness all the elect and angels saying to God: 'This man has been a faithful minister and teacher. He has proclaimed the saving Word of God to a world of castaways. On yonder earth he was despised, persecuted, and maligned, but he shines now as a star with imperishable luster.'"
C. F. W. Walther, The Proper Distinction between Law and Gospel, trans., W. H. T. Dau, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1928, p. 402. Daniel 12:3.