ICHABOD, THE GLORY HAS DEPARTED - explores the Age of Apostasy, predicted in 2 Thessalonians 2:3, to attack Objective Faithless Justification, Church Growth Clowns, and their ringmasters. The antidote to these poisons is trusting the efficacious Word in the Means of Grace. John 16:8. Isaiah 55:8ff. Romans 10. Most readers are WELS, LCMS, ELS, or ELCA. This blog also covers the Roman Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodoxy, and the Left-wing, National Council of Churches denominations.
Martin Luther Sermons
Bethany Lutheran Hymnal Blog
Bethany Lutheran Church P.O. Box 6561 Springdale AR 72766 Reformation Seminary Lectures USA, Canada, Australia, Philippines 10 AM Central - Sunday Service
We use The Lutheran Hymnal and the King James Version
Luther's Sermons: Lenker Edition
Click here for all previous YouTube Videos
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Formula of Concord: The Scriptures Are the Pure Clear Fountain of Israel
3] 1. First [, then, we receive and embrace with our whole heart] the Prophetic and Apostolic Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments as the pure, clear fountain of Israel, which is the only true standard by which all teachers and doctrines are to be judged.
4] 2. And since of old the true Christian doctrine, in a pure, sound sense, was collected from God's Word into brief articles or chapters against the corruption of heretics, we confess, in the second place, the three Ecumenical Creeds, namely, the Apostles', the Nicene, and the Athanasian, as glorious confessions of the faith, brief, devout, and founded upon God's Word, in which all the heresies which at that time had arisen in the Christian Church are clearly and unanswerably refuted.
http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2012/05/formula-of-concord-comprehensive.html
Labels:
Formula of Concord
I Have Warned My Students about This Typo, Because It Is Found All Over the Net
ALBP Online Forum:
All along I had felt that the issue, the Human Sexuality Gift and Trust (HSGT) Social Statement, and the provision to ordain LGBTQ people in life-long, pubically accountable, same sex relationships, was not defensible.
Tim Glende Cannot Spell or Write, But He Considers Himself a Theologian of Unusual Subtlety
Truly - died in the wool! http://www.zazzle.com/funny_birthday_card_with_wolves_and_a_dead_sheep-137051921377908019 |
The Neo-Ohioans give themselves away when they tout "The Errors of Modern Missouri" and the butchered treatment of the 'hoi polloi' of Roman's (sic) 5 by RCH Lenski. Lenski needed to interpret the meaning wrongfully to make his idea of predestination work.
Jackson was going to give a treatment of Election on his blog, but instead, the died (sic!) in the wool 'Traditional Lutheran' continues to parade about under the guise of a Confessional Lutheran by posting the works of the truly Confessional Lutheran church fathers. [GJ - How devious of me - to publish the entire Book of Concord and Luther's Sermons, instead of Groeschel's Methodism and Stanley's gay activism.]
Today in his tribute to Quenstedt, he fails to see that he continues to quote the faithful fathers referring to Christ's righteousness (justification) as objective and what faith rests in. [GJ - Badly composed sentence - needs a complete rewrite.]
***
Wait until the signage goes up! |
GJ - Tim Glende does not answer how he managed to spend eight years in his last call and left them without a single Book of Concord in the debt-choked building.
I keep asking WELS and Missouri - "If Church Growth is so great, why are your synods disintegrating? Why are you skimming offering funds to prop up your Fuller/Willow Creek experiments?"
There are many fine, dedicated pastors in the WELS, Missouri, and Little Sect on the Prairie. Unfortunately, they are not professors, DPs, CPs, or executives. The synods have become a way to drain the members to feather the nests of a few and to pay off the lawsuits that follow them.
---
St. Peter fundraiser day - Don't forget to 'eat wings for Jesus' all day today...Buffalo Wild Wings on Calumet in Darboy!
---
LPC has left a new comment on your post "Tim Glende Cannot Spell or Write, But He Considers...":
Isn't this Fake Ichabod from WELS?
He is quite dumb. Why is he publishing the comment of Joe Krohn who rejects the WELS UOJ version as totally false but now favors LC-MS UOJ version as totally right?
Maybe he does not get it, no?
LPC
GJ - Yes, Tim Glende runs the blog, getting a little help from Jim Pierce and Paul McCain. I find it funny that they simply add to their comments and keep repeating the same arguments.
---
LPC has left a new comment on your post "Tim Glende Cannot Spell or Write, But He Considers...":
Isn't this Fake Ichabod from WELS?
He is quite dumb. Why is he publishing the comment of Joe Krohn who rejects the WELS UOJ version as totally false but now favors LC-MS UOJ version as totally right?
Maybe he does not get it, no?
LPC
***
---
Today
in his tribute to Quenstedt, he fails to see that he continues to quote the
faithful fathers referring to Christ's righteousness (justification) as
objective and what faith rests in.
This
is where their stupidity reigns. In our debate with Steven Goodrich, I recall
this was discussed in reference to Preus' Justification and Rome. We have never denied that the
righteousness of Christ which is the merit of Christ is the object of
faith.
But
this is not what UOJ teaches as the object of faith - the righteousness which
UOJ teaches where faith should rest in not Jesus' Righteousness, but a
righteousness that was declared already on the sinner (purportedly) by
God who did it the moment,when either Jesus died on the cross or was raised
from the dead.
So
even in their doctrine, they are faking it.
LPC
PS.
You can quote me on that.
Labels:
Tim Glende,
WELS UOJ Becker
This Is Worth Studying - The Righteousness of Faith
Mary and Martha, by Norma Boeckler |
III. The Righteousness of Faith
1] The third controversy which has arisen among some theologians of the Augsburg Confession is concerning the righteousness of Christ or of faith, which God imputes by grace, through faith, to poor sinners for righteousness.
2] For one side has contended that the righteousness of faith, which the apostle calls the righteousness of God, is God's essential righteousness, which is Christ Himself as the true, natural, and essential Son of God, who dwells in the elect by faith and impels them to do right, and thus is their righteousness, compared with which righteousness the sins of all men are as a drop of water compared with the great ocean.
3] Over against this, others have held and taught that Christ is our righteousness according to His human nature alone.
4] In opposition to both these parties it has been unanimously taught by the other teachers of the Augsburg Confession that Christ is our righteousness not according to His divine nature alone, nor according to His human nature alone, but according to both natures; for He has redeemed, justified, and saved us from our sins as God and man, through His complete obedience; that therefore the righteousness of faith is the forgiveness of sins, reconciliation with God, and our adoption as God's children only on account of the obedience of Christ, which through faith alone, out of pure grace, is imputed for righteousness to all true believers, and on account of it they are absolved from all their unrighteousness.
5] Besides this [controversy] there have been still other disputes caused and excited on account of the Interim [on occasion of the formula of the Interim or of Interreligion], and otherwise, concerning the article of justification, which will hereafter be explained in antithesi, that is, in the enumeration of those errors which are contrary to the pure doctrine in this article.
6] This article concerning justification by faith (as the Apology says) is the chief article in the entire Christian doctrine, without which no poor conscience can have any firm consolation, or can truly know the riches of the grace of Christ, as Dr. Luther also has written: If this only article remains pure on the battlefield, the Christian Church also remains pure, and in goodly harmony and without any sects; but if it does not remain pure, it is not possible that any error or fanatical spirit can be resisted. (Tom. 5, Jena, p. 159.) 7] And concerning this article especially Paul says that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump. Therefore, in this article he urges with so much zeal and earnestness the particulas exclusivas, that is, the words whereby the works of men are excluded (namely, without Law, without works, by grace [freely], Rom. 3:28; 4:5; Eph. 2:8-9), in order to indicate how highly necessary it is that in this article, aside from [the presentation of] the pure doctrine, the antithesis, that is, all contrary dogmas, be stated separately, exposed, and rejected by this means.
8] Therefore, in order to explain this controversy in a Christian way by means of God's Word, and, by His grace, to settle it, our doctrine, faith, and confession are as follows:
9] Concerning the righteousness of faith before God we believe, teach, and confess unanimously, in accordance with the comprehensive summary of our faith and confession presented above, that poor sinful man is justified before God, that is, absolved and declared free and exempt from all his sins, and from the sentence of well-deserved condemnation, and adopted into sonship and heirship of eternal life, without any merit or worth of our own, also without any preceding, present, or any subsequent works, out of pure grace, because of the sole merit, complete obedience, bitter suffering, death, and resurrection of our Lord Christ alone, whose obedience is reckoned to us for righteousness.
10] These treasures are offered us by the Holy Ghost in the promise of the holy Gospel; and faith alone is the only means by which we lay hold upon, accept, and apply, and appropriate them to ourselves. 11] This faith is a gift of God, by which we truly learn to know Christ, our Redeemer, in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him, that for the sake of His obedience alone we have the forgiveness of sins by grace, are regarded as godly and righteous by God the father, and are eternally saved. 12] Therefore it is considered and understood to be the same thing when Paul says that we are justified by faith, Rom. 3:28, or that faith is counted to us for righteousness, Rom. 4:5, and when he says that we are made righteous by the obedience of One, Rom. 5:19, or that by the righteousness of One justification of faith came to all men, Rom. 5:18. 13] For faith justifies, not for this cause and reason that it is so good a work and so fair a virtue, but because it lays hold of and accepts the merit of Christ in the promise of the holy Gospel; for this must be applied and appropriated to us by faith, if we are to be justified thereby. 14] Therefore the righteousness which is imputed to faith or to the believer out of pure grace is the obedience, suffering, and resurrection of Christ, since He has made satisfaction for us to the Law, and paid for [expiated] our sins. 15] For since Christ is not man alone, but God and man in one undivided person, He was as little subject to the Law, because He is the Lord of the Law, as He had to suffer and die as far as His person is concerned. For this reason, then, His obedience, not only in suffering and dying, but also in this, that He in our stead was voluntarily made under the Law, and fulfilled it by this obedience, is imputed to us for righteousness, so that, on account of this complete obedience, which He rendered His heavenly Father for us, by doing and suffering, in living and dying, God forgives our sins, regards us as godly and righteous, and eternally saves us.
Lamb of God by Norma Boeckler |
16] This righteousness is offered us by the Holy Ghost through the Gospel and in the Sacraments, and is applied, appropriated, and received through faith, whence believers have reconciliation with God, forgiveness of sins, the grace of God, sonship, and heirship of eternal life.
17] Accordingly, the word justify here means to declare righteous and free from sins, and to absolve one from eternal punishment for the sake of Christ's righteousness, which is imputed by God to faith, Phil. 3:9. For this use and understanding of this word is common in the Holy Scriptures of the Old and the New Testament. Prov. 17:15: He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the Lord. Is. 5:23: Woe unto them which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him! Rom. 8:33: Who shall lay anything to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth, that is, absolves from sins and acquits.
18] However, since the word regeneratio, regeneration, is sometimes employed for the word iustificatio, justification, it is necessary that this word be properly explained, in order that the renewal which follows justification of faith may not be confounded with the justification of faith, but that they may be properly distinguished from one another.
19] For, in the first place, the word regeneratio, that is, regeneration, is used so as to comprise at the same time the forgiveness of sins for Christ's sake alone, and the succeeding renewal which the Holy Ghost works in those who are justified by faith. Then, again, it is [sometimes] used pro remissione peccatorum et adoptione in filios Dei, that is, so as to mean only the remission of sins, and that we are adopted as sons of God. And in this latter sense the word is much and often used in the Apology, where it is written: Iustificatio est regeneratio, that is, Justification before God is regeneration. St. Paul, too, has employed these words as distinct from one another, Titus 3:5: He saved us by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Ghost. 20] As also the word vivificatio, that is, making alive, has sometimes been used in a like sense. For when man is justified through faith (which the Holy Ghost alone works), this is truly a regeneration, because from a child of wrath he becomes a child of God, and thus is transferred from death to life, as it is written: When we were dead in sins, He hath quickened us together with Christ, Eph. 2:5. Likewise: The just shall live by faith, Rom. 1:17; Hab. 2:4. In this sense the word is much and often used in the Apology.
21] But again, it is often taken also for sanctification and renewal, which succeeds the righteousness of faith, as Dr. Luther has thus used it in his book concerning the Church and the Councils, and elsewhere.
22] But when we teach that through the operation of the Holy Ghost we are born anew and justified, the sense is not that after regeneration no unrighteousness clings any more to the justified and regenerate in their being and life, but that Christ covers all their sins which nevertheless in this life still inhere in nature with His complete obedience. But irrespective of this they are declared and regarded godly and righteous by faith and for the sake of Christ's obedience (which Christ rendered the Father for us from His birth to His most ignominious death upon the cross), although, on account of their corrupt nature, they still are and remain sinners to the grave [while they bear about this mortal body]. Nor, on the other hand, is this the meaning, that without repentance, conversion, and renewal we might or should yield to sins, and remain and continue in them.
23] For true [and not feigned] contrition must precede; and to those who, in the manner stated, out of pure grace, for the sake of the only Mediator, Christ, without any works and merit, are righteous before God, that is, are received into grace, the Holy Ghost is also given, who renews and sanctifies them, and works in them love to God and to their neighbor. But since the incipient renewal is imperfect in this life, and sin still dwells in the flesh, even in the regenerate, the righteousness of faith before God consists in the gracious imputation of the righteousness of Christ, without the addition of our works, so that our sins are forgiven us and covered, and are not imputed, Rom. 4:6ff
24] But here very good attention must be given with especial diligence, if the article of justification is to remain pure, lest that which precedes faith, and that which follows after it, be mingled together or inserted into the article of justification as necessary and belonging to it, because it is not one or the same thing to speak of conversion and of justification.
25] For not everything that belongs to conversion belongs likewise to the article of justification, in and to which belong and are necessary only the grace of God, the merit of Christ, and faith, which receives this in the promise of the Gospel, whereby the righteousness of Christ is imputed to us, whence we receive and have forgiveness of sins, reconciliation with God, sonship, and heirship of eternal life.
26] Therefore true, saving faith is not in those who are without contrition and sorrow, and have a wicked purpose to remain and persevere in sins; but true contrition precedes, and genuine faith is in or with true repentance [justifying faith is in those who repent truly, not feignedly].
27] Love is also a fruit which surely and necessarily follows true faith. For the fact that one does not love is a sure indication that he is not justified, but is still in death, or has lost the righteousness of faith again, as John says, 1 John 3:14. But when Paul says, Rom. 3:28: We are justified by faith without works, he indicates thereby that neither the contrition that precedes, nor the works that follow, belong in the article or transaction of justification by faith. For good works do not precede justification, but follow it, and the person must first be justified before he can do good works.
28] In like manner also renewal and sanctification, although it is also a benefit of the Mediator, Christ, and a work of the Holy Ghost, does not belong in the article or affair of justification before God, but follows the same since, on account of our corrupt flesh, it is not entirely perfect and complete in this life, as Dr. Luther writes well concerning this in his beautiful and large exposition of the Epistle to the Galatians, in which he says as follows: 29] We concede indeed that instruction should be given also concerning love and good works, yet in such a way that this be done when and where it is necessary, namely, when otherwise and outside of this matter of justification we have to do with works. But here the chief matter dealt with is the question, not whether we should also do good works and exercise love, but by what means we can be justified before God, and saved. And here we answer thus with St. Paul: that we are justified by faith in Christ alone, and not by the deeds of the Law or by love. Not that we hereby entirely reject works and love, as the adversaries falsely slander and accuse us, but that we do not allow ourselves to be led away, as Satan desires, from the chief matter with which we have to do here to another and foreign affair which does not at all belong to this matter. Therefore, whereas, and as long as we are occupied with this article of justification, we reject and condemn works, since this article is so constituted that it can admit of no disputation or treatment whatever regarding works; therefore in this matter we cut short all Law and works of the Law. So far Luther.
30] In order, therefore, that troubled hearts may have a firm, sure consolation, also, that due honor be given to the merit of Christ and the grace of God, the Scriptures teach that the righteousness of faith before God consists alone in the gracious [gratuitous] reconciliation or the forgiveness of sins, which is presented to us out of pure grace, for the sake of the only merit of the Mediator, Christ, and is received through faith alone in the promise of the Gospel. In like manner, too, in justification before God faith relies neither upon contrition nor upon love or other virtues, but upon Christ alone, and in Him upon His complete obedience by which He has fulfilled the Law for us, which [obedience] is imputed to believers for righteousness.
31] Moreover, neither contrition nor love or any other virtue, but faith alone is the sole means and instrument by which and through which we can receive and accept the grace of God, the merit of Christ, and the forgiveness of sins, which are offered us in the promise of the Gospel.
32] It is also correctly said that believers who in Christ through faith have been justified, have in this life first the imputed righteousness of faith, and then also the incipient righteousness of the new obedience or of good works. But these two must not be mingled with one another or be both injected at the same time into the article of justification by faith before God. For since this incipient righteousness or renewal in us is incomplete and impure in this life because of the flesh, the person cannot stand with and by it [on the ground of this righteousness] before God's tribunal, but before God's tribunal only the righteousness of the obedience, suffering, and death of Christ, which is imputed to faith, can stand, so that only for the sake of this obedience is the person (even after his renewal, when he has already many good works and lives the best [upright and blameless] life) pleasing and acceptable to God, and is received into adoption and heirship of eternal life.
33] Here belongs also what St. Paul writes Rom. 4:3, that Abraham was justified before God by faith alone, for the sake of the Mediator, without the cooperation of his works, not only when he was first converted from idolatry and had no good works, but also afterwards, when he had been renewed by the Holy Ghost, and adorned with many excellent good works, Gen. 15:6; Heb. 11:8. And Paul puts the following question, Rom. 4:1ff : On what did Abraham's righteousness before God for everlasting life, by which he had a gracious God, and was pleasing and acceptable to Him, rest at that time?
34] This he answers: To him who worketh not, but believeth on Him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness; as David also, Ps. 32:1, speaks of the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness without works. 35] Hence, even though the converted and believing [in Christ] have incipient renewal, sanctification, love, virtue, and good works, yet these neither can nor should be drawn into, or mingled with, the article of justification before God, in order that the honor due Him may remain with Christ the Redeemer, and tempted consciences may have a sure consolation, since our new obedience is incomplete and impure.
36] And this is the meaning of the Apostle Paul when in this article he urges so diligently and zealously the particulas exclusivas, that is, the words by which works are excluded from the article of justification: absque operibus, sine lege, gratis, non ex operibus, that is, by grace, without merit, without works, not of works. These exclusivae are all comprised in the expression: By faith alone in Christ we are justified before God and saved. For thereby works are excluded, not in the sense that a true faith can exist without contrition, or that good works should, must, and dare not follow true faith as sure and indubitable fruits, or that believers dare not nor must do anything good; but good works are excluded from the article of justification before God, so that they must not be drawn into, woven into, or mingled with the transaction of the justification of the poor sinner before God as necessary or belonging thereto. And the true sense of the particulae exclusivae in articulo iustificationis, that is, of the aforementioned terms, in the article of justification, consists in the following, and they should also be urged in this article with all diligence and earnestness [on account of these reasons]:
37] 1. That thereby [through these particles] all our own works, merit, worthiness, glory, and confidence in all our works are entirely excluded in the article of justification so that our works shall not be constituted or regarded as either the cause or the merit of justification, neither entirely, nor half, nor in the least part, upon which God could or ought to look, or we to rely in this article and action.
38] 2. That this remain the office and property of faith alone, that it alone, and nothing else whatever, is the means or instrument by and through which God's grace and the merit of Christ in the promise of the Gospel are received, apprehended, accepted, applied to us, and appropriated; and that from this office and property of such application or appropriation love and all other virtues or works are excluded.
39] 3. That neither renewal, sanctification, virtues nor good works are tamquam forma aut pars aut causa iustificationis, that is, our righteousness before God, nor are they to be constituted and set up as a part or cause of our righteousness, or otherwise under any pretext, title, or name whatever to be mingled in the article of justification as necessary and belonging thereto; but that the righteousness of faith consists alone in the forgiveness of sins out of pure grace, for the sake of Christ's merit alone; which blessings are offered us in the promise of the Gospel, and are received, accepted, applied, and appropriated by faith alone.
40] In the same manner the order also between faith and good works must abide and be maintained, and likewise between justification and renewal, or sanctification.
41] For good works do not precede faith, neither does sanctification precede justification. But first faith is kindled in us in conversion by the Holy Ghost from the hearing of the Gospel. This lays hold of God's grace in Christ, by which the person is justified. Then, when the person is justified, he is also renewed and sanctified by the Holy Ghost, from which renewal and sanctification the fruits of good works then follow. Et haec non ita divelluntur, quasi vera fides aliquando et aliquamdiu stare possit cum malo proposito, sed ordine causarum et effectuum, antecedentium et consequentium, ita distribuuntur. Manet enim, quod Lutherus recte dicit: Bene conveniunt et sunt connexa inseparabiliter fides et opera; sed sola fides est, quae apprehendit benedictionem sine operibus, et tamen nunquam est sola. That is: This should not be understood as though justification and renewal were sundered from one another in such a manner that a genuine faith sometimes could exist and continue for a time together with a wicked intention, but hereby only the order [of causes and effects, of antecedents and consequents] is indicated, how one precedes or succeeds the other. For what Luther has correctly said remains true nevertheless: Faith and good works well agree and fit together [are inseparably connected]; but it is faith alone, without works, which lays hold of the blessing; and yet it is never and at no time alone. This has been set forth above.
42] Many disputations also are usefully and well explained by means of this true distinction, of which the Apology treats in reference to the passage James 2:20. For when we speak of faith, how it justifies, the doctrine of St. Paul is that faith alone, without works, justifies, Rom. 3:28, inasmuch as it applies and appropriates to us the merit of Christ, as has been said. But if the question is, wherein and whereby a Christian can perceive and distinguish, either in himself or in others, a true living faith from a feigned and dead faith, (since many idle, secure Christians imagine for themselves a delusion in place of faith, while they nevertheless have no true faith,) the Apology gives this answer: James calls that dead faith where good works and fruits of the Spirit of every kind do not follow. And to this effect the Latin edition of the Apology says: Iacobus recte negat, nos tali fide iustificari, quae est sine operibus, hoc est, quae mortua est. That is: St. James teaches correctly when he denies that we are justified by such a faith as is without works, which is dead faith.
43] But James speaks, as the Apology says, concerning the works of those who have already been justified through Christ, reconciled with God, and obtained forgiveness of sins through Christ. But if the question is, whereby and whence faith has this, and what appertains to this that it justifies and saves, it is false and incorrect to say: Fidem non posse iustificare sine operibus; vel fidem, quatenus caritatem, qua formatur, coniunctam habet, iustificare; vel fidei, ut iustificet, necessariam esse praesentiam bonorum operum; vel bona opera esse causam sine qua non, quae per particulas exclusivas ex articulo iustificationis non excludantur. That is: That faith cannot justify without works; or that faith justifies or makes righteous, inasmuch as it has love with it, for the sake of which love this is ascribed to faith [it has love with it, by which it is formed]; or that the presence of works with faith is necessary if otherwise man is to be justified thereby before God; or that the presence of good works in the article of justification, or for justification, is needful, so that good works are a cause without which man cannot be justified, and that they are not excluded from the article of justification by the particulae exclusivae: absque operibus etc., that is, when St. Paul says: without works. For faith makes righteous only inasmuch as and because, as a means and instrument, it lays hold of, and accepts, the grace of God and the merit of Christ in the promise of the Gospel.
44] Let this suffice, according to the plan of this document, as a summary explanation of the doctrine of justification by faith, which is treated more at length in the above-mentioned writings. From these, the antithesis also, that is, the false contrary dogmas, are manifest, namely, that in addition to the errors recounted above also the following and similar ones, which conflict with the explanation now published, must be censured, exposed, and rejected, as when it is taught:
45] 1. That our love or good works are a merit or cause of justification before God, either entirely or at least in part.
46] 2. Or that by good works man must render himself worthy and fit that the merit of Christ may be imparted to him.
47] 3. Vel formalem nostram iustitiam coram Deo esse inhaerentem nostram novitatem seu caritatem; that is, that our real righteousness before God is the love or renewal which the Holy Ghost works in us, and which is in us.
48] 4. Or that two things or parts belong to the righteousness of faith before God in which it consists, namely, the gracious forgiveness of sins, and then, secondly, also renewal or sanctification.
49] 5. Item, fidem iustificare tantum initialiter, vel partialiter, vel principaliter; et novitatem vel caritatem nostram iustificare etiam coram Deo vel completive, vel minus principaliter (that is, that faith justifies only initially, either in part or primarily, and that our newness or love justifies even before God, either completively or secondarily).
50] 6. Item, credentes coram Deo iustificari vel coram Deo iustos esse simul et imputatione et inchoatione, vel partim imputatione, partim inchoatione novae obedientiae (that is, also that believers are justified before God, or are righteous before God, both by imputation and by inchoation at the same time, or partly by the imputation of Christ's righteousness and partly by the beginning of new obedience).
51] 7. Item, applicationem promissionis gratiae fieri et fide cordis et confessione oris ac reliquis virtutibus (that is, also that the application of the promise of grace occurs both by faith of the heart and confession of the mouth, and by other virtues). That is: Faith makes righteous for this reason alone, that righteousness is begun in us by faith, or in this way, that faith takes the precedence in justification; nevertheless, renewal and love also belong to our righteousness before God, however, in such a way that it is not the chief cause of our righteousness, but that our righteousness before God is not entire and complete without such love and renewal. Likewise, that believers are justified and righteous before God at the same time by the imputed righteousness of Christ and the incipient new obedience, or in part by the imputation of Christ's righteousness and in part by the incipient new obedience. Likewise, that the promise of grace is appropriated to us by faith in the heart, and confession which is made with the mouth, and by other virtues.
52] Also this is incorrect, when it is taught that man must be saved in some other way or through something else than as he is justified before God, so that we are indeed justified before God by faith alone, without works, but that it is impossible to be saved without works or obtain salvation without works.
53] This is false, for the reason that it is directly opposed to the declaration of Paul, Rom. 4:6: The blessedness is of the man unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works. And Paul's reason [the basis of Paul's argument] is that we obtain both, salvation as well as righteousness, in one and the same way; yea, that by: this very means, when we are justified by faith, we receive at the same time adoption and heirship of eternal life and salvation; and on this account Paul employs and emphasizes the particulas exclusivas, that is, those words by which works and our own merits are entirely excluded, namely, by grace, without works, as forcibly in the article concerning salvation as in the article concerning righteousness.
54] Likewise also the disputation concerning the indwelling in us of the essential righteousness of God must be correctly explained. For although in the elect, who are justified by Christ and reconciled with God, God the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, who is the eternal and essential righteousness, dwells by faith (for all Christians are temples of God the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, who also impels them to do right), yet this indwelling of God is not the righteousness of faith of which St. Paul treats and which he calls iustitiam Dei, that is, the righteousness of God, for the sake of which we are declared righteous before God; but it follows the preceding righteousness of faith, which is nothing else than the forgiveness of sins and the gracious adoption of the poor sinner, for the sake of Christ's obedience and merit alone.
55] Accordingly, since in our churches it is acknowledged [established beyond controversy] among the theologians of the Augsburg Confession that all our righteousness is to be sought outside the merits, works, virtues, and worthiness of ourselves and of all men, and rests alone upon Christ the Lord, it must be carefully considered in what respect Christ is called our Righteousness in this affair of justification, namely, that our righteousness rests not upon one or the other nature, but upon the entire person of Christ, who as God and man is our Righteousness in His only, entire, and complete obedience.
56] For even though Christ had been conceived and born without sin by the Holy Ghost, and had fulfilled all righteousness in His human nature alone, and yet had not been true and eternal God, this obedience and suffering of His human nature could not be imputed to us for righteousness. As also, if the Son of God had not become man, the divine nature alone could not be our righteousness. Therefore we believe, teach, and confess that the entire obedience of the entire person of Christ, which He has rendered the Father for us even to His most ignominious death upon the cross, is imputed to us for righteousness. For the human nature alone, without the divine, could neither by obedience nor suffering render satisfaction to eternal almighty God for the sins of all the world; however, the divinity alone, without the humanity, could not mediate between God and us.
57] But, since it is the obedience as above mentioned [not only of one nature, but] of the entire person, it is a complete satisfaction and expiation for the human race, by which the eternal, immutable righteousness of God, revealed in the Law, has been satisfied, and is thus our righteousness, which avails before God and is revealed in the Gospel, and upon which faith relies before God, which God imputes to faith, as it is written, Rom. 5:19: For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of One shall many be made righteous; and 1 John 1:7: The blood of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, cleanseth us from all sin. Likewise: The just shall live by his faith, Hab. 2:4; Rom. 1:17.
58] Thus neither the divine nor the human nature of Christ by itself is imputed to us for righteousness, but only the obedience of the person who is at the same time God and man. And faith thus regards the person of Christ as it was made under the Law for us, bore our sins, and in His going to the Father offered to His heavenly Father for us poor sinners His entire, complete obedience, from His holy birth even unto death, and has thereby covered all our disobedience which inheres in our nature, and its thoughts, words, and works, so that it is not imputed to us for condemnation, but is pardoned and forgiven out of pure grace, alone for Christ's sake.
59] Therefore we unanimously reject and condemn, besides the above-mentioned, also the following and all similar errors, as contrary to God's Word, the doctrine of the prophets and apostles, and our Christian faith:
60] 1. When it is taught that Christ is our righteousness before God according to His divine nature alone.
61] 2. That Christ is our righteousness according to His human nature alone.
62] 3. That in the passages from the prophets and apostles, when the righteousness of faith is spoken of, the words justify and to be justified are not to signify to declare free from sins and to obtain the forgiveness of sins, but to be made actually and really righteous because of love infused by the Holy Ghost, virtues, and the works following from it.
63] 4. That faith looks not only to the obedience of Christ, but to His divine nature as it dwells and works in us, and that by this indwelling our sins are covered before God.
64] 5. That faith is such a trust in the obedience of Christ as can be and remain in a person notwithstanding he has no genuine repentance, in whom also no love follows, but who persists in sins against his conscience.
65] 6. That not God dwells in the believers, but only the gifts of God.
66] These and like errors, one and all, we unanimously reject as contrary to the clear Word of God, and by God's grace abide firmly and constantly in the doctrine of the righteousness of faith before God, as it is embodied, expounded, and proved from God's Word in the Augsburg Confession, and the Apology issued after it.
67] Concerning what is needful furthermore for the proper explanation of this profound and chief article of justification before God, upon which depends the salvation of our souls, we direct, and for the sake of brevity herewith refer, every one to Dr. Luther's beautiful and glorious exposition of the Epistle of St. Paul to the Galatians.
Labels:
Justification by Faith
Pope Paul the Unlearned Plagiarizes Typo from Aardvark Alley
This is too funny. I wanted to check on Paul McCain's plagiarism. The site did not come up from an ordinary link at LaughQuest. Apparently only a mirror site was working, so I found that and called up a few posts.
I saw the Constantine post again, so I Googled part of it, with a typo, to see what would come up. Note that this is exactly what I found at this time, the same on two blogs at once.
McCain CyberBrethren: - 69.195.110.196.
"Constantine took an active interest in the life and teachings of the church and. He called the First Council of Nicaea in 325 at which Saint Athanasius and others defended and defined orthodox Christianity."
Aardvark Alley:
Constantine took an active interest in the life and teachings of the church and. He called the First Council of Nicaea in 325 at which Saint Athanasius and others defended and defined orthodox Christianity." AA has two links in the second sentence, which might have been too revealing if McCain had left them in.
When you see it, you will know. AA broke off the sentence at "and." McCain did the same thing. That was a quick copy and paste. If I want format code to drop out, I copy blog text into WordPad, which drops colors, links, and fonts. There is a tool in Blogger, a T with a red x, that also does this.
Nobody can accidentally write the same words in a row. I used to laugh at students who gave me material copied directly from Wikipedia. Several student essays had this classic copying error in them, not unlike McCain's:
The ambitious Holly became increasingly interested in the New York music/recording/publishing scene, while his band mates wanted to go back home to Lubbock.[citation needed]
I find it hilarious that someone would leave in an obvious editing note when his own material is seriously lacking in research or editing - just like McCain's.
Since McCain has an established practice of copying old material and pretending it is his, or masking the source in various clever ways, I have to assume that McCain copied AA.
Using more than five words in a row from a source should be marked with quotation marks or a similar device, such as indenting an entire block quotation.
I remember when McCain lectured everyone on good blogging practices. That is an example of irony.
Labels:
Paul McCain
ELCA grapples with financial crunch - Toledo Blade.
Ohio Follows ELCA in Shrinking
"Stop enabling Jackson, Brett. Ohio is the tip of the iceberg. The Titantic is now backing up to ram it again." |
ELCA grapples with financial crunch - Toledo Blade:
BOWLING GREEN -- Delegates to the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America's regional conference, now under way at Bowling Green State University, are facing some difficult decisions.
Unlike at most mainline Protestant meetings these days, however, the debates at the 2012 Northwest Ohio Synod Assembly are not about gay marriage or gay clergy. This time, the tough choices involve a different hot-button issue: money, or the lack of it.
Donations are down for a variety of reasons, while expenses, including medical insurance for clergy and staff, are on the rise.
Bishop Marcus Lohrmann said in a report to the synod Friday and in an interview with The Blade this week that the synod's budget has been shrinking for years and has reached the point where drastic changes, not just temporary fixes, are necessary.
The challenge facing the 450-some delegates who will vote on the synod's 2013 budget is to find new ways to continue the church's mission and ministries as effectively and efficiently as possible while living under new financial realities.
The financial concerns are centered in three areas, according to Bishop Lohrmann: revenue, synod staffing, and fallout from the national ELCA's 2009 vote to allow the ordination of gay clergy and the support of same-sex unions.
The local Lutheran synod has 165 congregations and nearly 90,000 members in 23 northwest Ohio counties, plus one congregation in Indiana, and the contributions from the churches to the regional headquarters have been declining for years. Giving is $967,000 less this year than in 2000, a drop of 36 percent, according to Sherry Krieger, the synod's director for administration and communication.
The synod's total income for 2012 is estimated at $1,715,000, compared with $2,682,022 in 2000. Just five years ago, before the global economic meltdown of 2008, the synod's budget was $2,552,427.
Fifty-one percent of the synod's revenue goes back to the national headquarters in Chicago, Ms. Krieger said, and the remaining 49 percent is used for administrative costs and Lutheran outreaches including the campus ministry at the University of Toledo, Trinity Seminary in Columbus, new churches such as Threshold, and funding for congregations in struggling neighborhoods, including Salem Lutheran near downtown Toledo and Redeemer Lutheran in West Toledo.
The drop in revenue has led to a review of synod spending in all areas, Bishop Lohrmann said. Work hours for the six people on staff at the synod's Findlay headquarters were reduced in February by a vote of the synod's council, and pay was cut 10 percent.
Now the synod is reducing contributions to some of its most underfunded ministries.
"Those cuts have been painful," Bishop Lohrmann said.
He attributed the drop in donations to the overall economic downturn, pointing out that northwest Ohio has been hit especially hard.
"In contrast with other parts of this church, we are experiencing greater loss," the bishop said. "Part of it is the local economy. Folks are still struggling with employment issues. A piece of that is the aging of our own denomination and the increasing cost for medical coverage for clergy, for example. Congregations are struggling with their own finances."
The budget crunch has spurred the Findlay administration to reassess and re-evaluate all aspects of its mission and organization.
"Within the past year or two, it's become clear that we need to look at different staffing patterns, different structures," Bishop Lohrmann said. "Part of me grieves at that because we've developed a highly relational model."
Since Bishop Lohrmann was first elected bishop in 1998, he's had four assistants assigned to different geographical areas. With upcoming retirements, the budget calls for having just one assistant to the bishop by the end of this year. The Rev. Marc Miller, the synod's mission director for evangelism, is paid by the ELCA's national office in Chicago.
Bishop Lohrmann hopes to continue the synod's close relationship with local pastors and congregations by appointing a minister as a dean for each of the synod's seven geographic conferences, paying them a small stipend.
"The deans will work with pastors serving in those areas and work with congregations on a much closer level. … There seems to be some enthusiasm for that model and the reality is it may actually work at giving members broader ownership," he said.
The synod also continues to adjust to the loss of congregations that voted to leave the ELCA, the largest Lutheran denomination with 4.2 million members in 10,000 congregations, after the churchwide vote in 2009 that made it possible to ordain partnered gay clergy and to bless same-gender unions.
"I grieve the loss of the 19 congregations. I pray for the unity of the church," Bishop Lohrmann said. "At the same time, a lot of congregations in the synod are excited about turning the page and doing what we're called to do in the church. So it's been a time of grief, but on the other hand I'm sensing some excitement."
Bishop Lohrmann, 61, is in his third six-year term as bishop of the synod, having been re-elected for the second time in 2010. He said that among positive trends in the synod is a growing number of young people entering the ministry. "A few years ago, we had very few under age 35. I'm very pleased at the young pastors we are receiving into the synod. … We are very hopeful for the future and there is joy and enthusiasm."
He said of the pectoral cross, the large cross that bishops wear on their chests, "I do it with some weight. The cross is a sign to many people how the church has failed them or not reached out to them. On the other hand, it's a sign of the God who has not given up on the world."
The synod's financial picture, as tough as it is, ultimately could become a blessing if it inspires the church to reassess its priorities, the bishop said.
The goal is not "to preserve an institution for its own sake," Bishop Lohrmann said, but to ensure that the church continues to do the work of Jesus.
'via Blog this'
Steadfast Lutherans » Not the type of service you expect from a District – MNS serves eviction papers to ULC.
Do not question the DP or the Harrison administration. |
Steadfast Lutherans » Not the type of service you expect from a District – MNS serves eviction papers to ULC.:
In the past few days there has been a sequence of bad news for University Lutheran Chapel (ULC). First, their restraining order was vacated, allowing the Minnesota South (MNS) District to quickly move again on eviction. More bad news came in also in that the Doran Company received their building variance from the city of Minneapolis.
It appears that efforts to slow down this sale and eviction have not worked. There is an eviction hearing on June 1st for the congregation.
There are a few things that need to be noted here:
MNS refused an offer for more money (according to court documents filed by ULC), the noticeable difference in offers was that the higher one allowed for a chapel to be created and used by the congregation. Instead the smaller offer from Doran was accepted. That does not appear to speak well for anyone thinking this is about the money.
The cloak of secrecy behind “executive sessions” has left room for all sorts of questions which could have been answered with some level of openness in this process. Instead, the District has chosen secrecy.
The property of ULC was purchased by people of the MNS and Minnesota North (MNN) Districts to serve students at the University of MN. That property was put in the stewardship of the MNS District, who has now sold it (contrary to the wishes of all those who donated gifts to purchase the property decades ago). This is not good stewardship at all. They have gone against the trust of those who first donated for ULC to exist.
President Sietz of the MNS District is retiring this year. It appears that the eviction and sale of ULC will be his legacy.
So much for the Witness, Mercy, and Life Together of Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod (LCMS) Lutherans in the twin cities.
I will not add anything more than the plain and simple Word of God:
Matthew 20:25-26a
'via Blog this'
Luther - But Outside of This Christian Church,
Where the Gospel Is Not, There Is No Forgiveness.
Large Catechism, Book of Concord
Photo by Iggy Antiochus |
Martin Luther, Large Catechism, The Creed, Article III, Book of Concord:
We further believe that in this Christian Church we have forgiveness of sin, which is wrought through the holy Sacraments and Absolution, moreover, through all manner of consolatory promises of the entire Gospel. Therefore, whatever is to be preached concerning the Sacraments belongs here, and, in short, the whole Gospel and all the offices of Christianity, which also must be preached and taught without ceasing. For although the grace of God is secured through Christ, and sanctification is wrought by the Holy Ghost through the Word of God in the unity of the Christian Church, yet on account of our flesh which we bear about with us we are never without sin.
Everything, therefore, in the Christian Church is ordered to the end that we shall daily obtain there nothing but the forgiveness of sin through the Word and signs, to comfort and encourage our consciences as long as we live here. Thus, although we have sins, the [grace of the] Holy Ghost does not allow them to injure us, because we are in the Christian Church, where there is nothing but [continuous, uninterrupted] forgiveness of sin, both in that God forgives us, and in that we forgive, bear with, and help each other.
But outside of this Christian Church, where the Gospel is not, there is no forgiveness, as also there can be no holiness [sanctification]. Therefore all who seek and wish to merit holiness [sanctification], not through the Gospel and forgiveness of sin, but by their works, have expelled and severed themselves [from this Church].
Labels:
Justification by Faith,
Large Catechism,
Luther
What Is the Gospel?
AC V has left a new comment on your post "Luther's Brilliant Section in the Smalcald Article...":
What is the Gospel?:
The very voice of the Gospel is this, that by faith we obtain the remission of sins. [This word is not our word, but the voice and word of Jesus Christ, our Savior.] - Apology XII (V):2
Quenstedt Died Today, May 22, 1688.
He Rejected UOJ
The Walther myth-makers will not admit that their Pietist hero obeyed and enforced the edicts of a sex cult leader, Bishop Martin Stephan, STD.
Rambach and Halle Pietism
Worst of all, Walther made Stephan's Halle Pietism his own, building a little fortress around that anti-Scriptural fetish of the world being absolved of sin on Easter. The exegesis for that Easter absolution fantasy comes from Rambach, a Halle Pietist. (Look up the first hymn about baptism in The Lutheran Hymnal: written by Rambach, "Baptized into Thy Name Most Holy," #298.)
UOJ guru Jay Webber favors Rambach's explanation over the earlier Chemnitz exegesis. That is important to realize. UOJ trumps Biblical knowledge - always. Rambach has no standing in Lutheran orthodoxy, while Chemnitz was the senior editor of the Book of Concord and the Formula of Concord. God prepared Chemnitz for that role by placing him in doctrinal combat with Roman Catholics and Calvinists.
One might say that Pietism was a skillful blend of Luther's and Calvin's doctrine - an amalgamation. Spener was the first union theologian, a prolific writer and remarkable organizer. All the Lutheran bodies in North America were established by Pietists, and Walther assumed the role of America's Lutheran pope.
Show of Hands
Let's see how many people have studied Quenstedt. Raise your hands. Hmmm. Be honest. I have always concentrated on Luther and Chemnitz, so Quenstedt has been a name from the later orthodoxy but not that well known.
I recall Robert Preus saying in a lecture that Quenstedt was his favorite, that he wanted to name one of his many sons Quenstedt. Johannes Quenstedt died 100 years after the Book of Concord was published, so that makes Quenstedt a late contributor to Lutheran orthodoxy.
Let's Look at the Orthodox Lutheran Family Tree:
Luther and Melanchthon trained Chemnitz (Book of Concord, etc) and Tyndale (the KJV translator).
Chemnitz was the uncle of P. Leyser, who battled against Samuel Huber's UOJ - at Wittenberg.
Leyser and Gerhard took over the unfinished Gospel Harmonies of Chemnitz.
Quenstedt wanted to study with his uncle, Gerhard, who died before that happened.
Quenstedt taught at Wittenberg.
The names come alive when we discover that these men battled against false doctrine within their ranks and outside of their confessions. Samuel Huber left Calvinism, everyone thought, and became a theologian on the Wittenberg faculty. His UOJ was soundly defeated by Leyser and others, but that did not make the issue fade from memory.
Doubtless Quenstedt published the statement above in reference to that earlier conflict. Here is a key statement from a good summary of Quenstedt's life:
Caleb Bassett in Excitare Studium, MLC:
After six years of study at Helmstedt, he arrived at the university at Wittenberg in 1644 to continue his work as a student. The Lord blessed Quenstedt with great success at Wittenberg, despite the cool reception by the other members of the university caused by Quenstedt’s history with the university at Helmstedt. Members of the faculty took him under their wing and through their encouragement, and more importantly through the study of the Word, he began to champion the truths of Lutheran orthodoxy.
Georg Calixtus was an infamous unionist at Helmstedt University, where Quenstedt studied. |
Tracing the roots can be a lot of fun. Those who promote UOJ have to skip over the research and memorize some more talking points to help them ignore the real issues.
This is like the old technique of bracketing, getting three photographs of the same scene, one under-exposed, one over-exposed. Naval historians would call this bracketing too, but in another sense. Battleships had three rifles (not guns, you land-lubbers) so the shells would bracket the enemy ship, one over, one under. Based on the fall of the shells, the crew could find the exact distance - except both ships were moving.
When we examine the controversies of the period, we can see what a theologian was arguing for and against - not abstracts and shadows on the wall.
Quenstedt wanted to study with Uncle Gerhard, his mother's brother. Studying at the University of Helmstedt made him suspect to the Wittenberg faculty, which he later joined, because of Calixtus' work in erasing doctrinal distinctions (modern Pietism or Church Growth). At Wittenberg he studied toward his doctorate and published his lectures.
Two Consistencies
Lutheran orthodoxy is consistent in teaching justification by faith and opposing attempts to subordinate it to Calvinism or Pietism. A few examples are the passages in Isaiah 55, Romans 4, 5, 10, the Gospel of John, Luther, Melanchthon, Chemnitz, Chytraeius, Andreae, Gerhard, Quenstedt, and the last book of Robert Preus, Justification and Rome.
UOJ is also consistent...with Calvinism (Huber) and Pietism - Rambach, Knapp, Stephan, Walther, and F. Pieper.
Labels:
LCMS UOJ WELS
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)