Thursday, July 4, 2019

The Crafts and Assaults of the Objective Justification Cheerleaders -
Against the Gospel Jesus Taught - Faith in Him

 "I try my best.
Bringing in the sheaves.
Bringing in the sheaves.
We shall come rejoicing, bringing them in to burn."

Objective Justification Cheerleaders (aka Justification by Faith deniers) say these things:


1. "Our church has always taught Objective Justification."

That is demonstrably false in ELCA, WELS, and the LCMS. They began with Justification by Faith. Thanks to a scholar, The Path To Understanding Justification has documented the early JBF statements of the LCMS and the turn to OJ. The ELS began with an OJ chip on their stooped shoulders.

1a. "You have turned against the teaching of your Synod."

The Gausewitz Catechism was used for decades in the Synodical Conference, where he was president. That work by a WELS leader taught Justification by Faith, so ever since - WELS-LCMS leadership has been comprised of men who turned against their own synod, the Book of Concord, and the Scriptures - in ascending order. The OJists turned against the teaching of their synods.

2. "You are a Pietist!"

OJ comes directly from late, rationalistic Pietism. The terms OJ and SJ were used by the Calvinist translator of the Pietist Knapp.


3. "You are a Calvinist!"

Tell me, O Hamlet of Dogmatics, where is one born already forgiven, absent the Word, lacking the Means of Grace? Yes, Calvin taught that God predestined everyone. That even sounds like Walther's Election without Faith.


4. "You are an Arminian!"

Calvin used that term for everyone who disagreed with him. David Scaer likes to toss it around to insult the Walter A. Maier family, whose publications make his look like that of an earnest first-year seminary student.

For the Preus brothers, this was not a minor issue. Jack Preus was not the only one to look into the issue. Ralph Bohlmann also did. The inability of the Missouri Synod once and for all to bring this matter to a conclusion may partially lie in that the Missouri Synod had long been “Protestantized” in an Arminian direction.
Scaer, David P.. Surviving the Storms: Memoirs of David P. Scaer. Luther Academy. Kindle Edition. 

5. "You are a horrible person!"

That is all the more reason to create and sustain justifying faith by declaring the truth of the Scriptures. The OJists are born forgiven, so they have no need for contrition or forgiveness.


6. "Luther taught Objective Justification." Webber

That statement is direct evidence of Biblical and doctrinal ignorance in the ELS, LCMS, and WELS, because nobody fell off a chair laughing at the paper. WELS published it in their precious Essay File.



7. "There is no connection between OJ and Church Growth." Webber

One only needs to crack open Valleskey's tome, We Believe, Therefore We Speak, which begins with OJ and exhausts almost every fad and dumb idea from Fuller Seminary.

8. "You have criticized Francis Pieper."

The Bible judges all books. If Pieper looks bad in comparison with the Scriptures, then that should take precedence over venerating a dead leader.

9. "Walther always taught OJ."

True, Walther learned OJ from Pastor Martin Stephan, a Pietist with a Pietist congregation, a former student at Halle University, where the Easter absolution of the world was taught.








Irony Galore - Objective Justification Cheerleaders Gather at Otten's Camp Trinity

 A reader wrote to me, "Spencer (below) was the Judas Goat of the Intrepids. He lined us up and ran out. The DPs came out after us."

The LCMS-WELS-ELS-CLC (sic) have united with ELCA in promoting Church Shrinkage and Objective Justification.

I wondered why Spencer contacted me to help promote anything by Jack B. Simple Cascione. Suddenly they are "scholars" at Camp Trinity with such OJ luminaries as ELDONA fellow traveler Rolf Preus, and WELS Wayne Mueller, former SP-in-Waiting and Church Growth denier.

The speakers I know are ardent OJ Pietists, so I expect the rest are as well.

Wayne Mueller made up the best GA Lie Ever when he published in the WELS magazine that there was no Church Growth in WELS and (notice the pivot) if there was, it was Scriptural. He lost me already on "no CG" because he made sure CG rained down on the faithful like a July thunderstorm.

Spencer told me that Mirthless Mark Schroeder would get rid of Wayne by provoking a confrontation - and it happened just like that. But the trouble with sects run on deception is this - they never change, except for the titular leaders.

 Scaer taught most of the ELDONUTs. He published his hatred of Justification by Faith for all to see - before the blessed birth of ELDONA.


Even ELDONA - which might prosper with some honest contrition - lies about their addiction to OJ while the Rolf Synod was bedded down with them. ELDONA even put their denials on YouTube, so the experienced could shout, "What? Are you kidding me?" at the screen.

Perhaps Rolf could explain to the gathered OJ army what the terms were for their fellowship with the ELDONUTs. Did Rydecki suddenly expose OJ to ELDONA and they shrieked "Heresy!" and posted their Justification by Faith theses?




The Brief Review of The Path To Understanding Justification in Christian News

 I said to the owner of this house, "The land is trying hard to reclaim your hidden path." For over 25 years, no one knew the path existed, because it was neglected and overgrown with grass and weeds. This revelation came as I was finishing the book.


Review of The Path to Understanding Justification, by G. Jackson

Review by David Becker Dr. Gregory L. Jackson, a former Christian News contributor who was friendly to CN many years ago, and whose book, Catholic -Lutheran - Protestant, is still sold by CN, has a new book out, The Path to Understanding Justification. This brief review is based strictly on the book’s contents and is my personal view, not necessarily shared by others who contribute to CN.

Dr. Jackson’s latest book is dedicated to Dr. Walter Maier and Rev. Vernon Harley. Lutheran Hour founding speaker Maier has frequently been praised in CN, and Pastor Harley wrote many devotional articles printed in CN in the 1970s and 1980s.

On page 24, Dr. Jackson says that Eve expected the birth of the promised Messiah in Genesis 4:1, a position also frequently held by Christian News founding editor Herman Otten.

A unique strength of the book is that it includes statements on justification from Lutheran catechisms from the early 1900s.

I would recommend the book for study by anyone and I give it four stars. I don’t give the book the highest five star rating because I think Dr. Jackson is imprecise in what he labels “pietism.” Also, Dr. Jackson does not reference Philip Hale’s recent book, Aspects of Forgiveness, which covers similar ground, although Dr. Jackson did publish a critical review of Hale’s book on his blog.

The 91 page paperback is available for $13.67 through Amazon.com (Kindle edition $0.99). It is also available for free as a dropbox PDF link on Dr. Jackson’s blog, The author has placed the book in the public domain.

***

GJ - On Genesis 4 - I agree with Luther and the plain meaning of the Hebrew text.

Becker's review never used the words - Justification by Faith. That has been my point for a long time. The opponents claim their dogma and anyone who agrees with St. Paul and Luther is a "denier of Objective Justification."

Otten refused to print anything from me after I published Thy Strong Word, which eviscerated Objective Justification and its twin parasite, Church Growth. Not only that, he was happy to print letters against me by CLC Church Shrinkers but refused to publish positive letters.

I published a book about Pietism and Objective Justification - here is a free PDF -
Luther versus the UOJ Pietists.

All my books are public domain and posted as free PDFs.




Customer Review of The Path To Understanding Justification

The Path To Understanding Justification begins with the Scriptures.


June 30, 2019
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
Gregory L Jackson PhD is a confessional Lutheran theologian, pastor, and teacher. He received a STM degree in Biblical studies from Yale in 1973 and he earned a Master's degree and a PhD in theology at the University of Notre Dame in 1982.

Dr Jackson wrote:

“Justification has been taught in two contradictory ways. The traditional teaching has always been Justification by Faith. That is the well-know phrase used by the Holy Spirit and St Paul, repeated as the Chief Article by Luther, Melancthon, and the Book of Concord editors. ... However, the Pietists and Rationalists, ever since Halle University's F. Schleiermacher, have defined Justification as God declaring the whole world forgiven and saved, apart from faith".

In this book, Dr Jackson does the following:

1. Outlines the Biblical Lutheran principle of Justification by Faith
2. Shows how Justification by Faith has been supplanted in the Lutheran conservative denominations by the false doctrine of Universal Justification apart from Faith (known as Objective Justification). He traces the historical progression of Objective Justification from the post-Reformation period through the present day.
3. Explains how Objective Justification has produced the lack of vitality and power we see in the conservative Lutheran denominations today (ELS, LCMS, WELS).

I would recommend this book to someone who wishes to understand the principle of Justification by Faith as it is taught in the Bible, how this principle has come to be disregarded by conservative Lutheran denominations. and the effects this action has had on present-day conservative Lutheran denominations.

Dr Jackson discusses the problems of present day Christian denominations on his internet blog. Google ichabodthegloryhasdeparted for the URL. He conducts a weekly traditional Lutheran worship service via the internet, the blog has a link to the broadcast site which also has archived broadcasts.


Wednesday, July 3, 2019

Our Lives, Our Fortunes, Our Sacred Honor - Post From Rush Limbaugh's Father




RUSH INTRODUCTION: My father, Rush H. Limbaugh, Jr., delivered this oft-requested address locally a number of times, but it had never before appeared in print until it was published in The Limbaugh Letter. My dad was renowned for his oratory skills and for his original mind; this speech is, I think, a superb demonstration of both. I will always be grateful to him for instilling in me a passion for the ideas and lives of America's Founders, as well as a deep appreciation for the inspirational power of words, which you will see evidenced here:

"Our Lives, Our Fortunes, Our Sacred Honor"

It was a glorious morning. The sun was shining and the wind was from the Southeast. Up especially early, a tall bony, redheaded young Virginian found time to buy a new thermometer, for which he paid three pounds, fifteen shillings. He also bought gloves for Martha, his wife, who was ill at home.

Thomas Jefferson arrived early at the statehouse. The temperature was 72.5 degrees and the horseflies weren't nearly so bad at that hour. It was a lovely room, very large, with gleaming white walls. The chairs were comfortable. Facing the single door were two brass fireplaces, but they would not be used today.

The moment the door was shut, and it was always kept locked, the room became an oven. The tall windows were shut, so that loud quarreling voices could not be heard by passersby. Small openings atop the windows allowed a slight stir of air, and also a large number of horseflies. Jefferson records that "the horseflies were dexterous in finding necks, and the silk of stockings was nothing to them." All discussing was punctuated by the slap of hands on necks.

On the wall at the back, facing the president's desk, was a panoply -- consisting of a drum, swords, and banners seized from Fort Ticonderoga the previous year. Ethan Allen and Benedict Arnold had captured the place, shouting that they were taking it "in the name of the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress!"

Now Congress got to work, promptly taking up an emergency measure about which there was discussion but no dissension. "Resolved: That an application be made to the Committee of Safety of Pennsylvania for a supply of flints for the troops at New York."

Then Congress transformed itself into a committee of the whole. The Declaration of Independence was read aloud once more, and debate resumed. Though Jefferson was the best writer of all of them, he had been somewhat verbose. Congress hacked the excess away. They did a good job, as a side-by-side comparison of the rough draft and the final text shows. They cut the phrase "by a self-assumed power." "Climb" was replaced by "must read," then "must" was eliminated, then the whole sentence, and soon the whole paragraph was cut. Jefferson groaned as they continued what he later called "their depredations." "Inherent and inalienable rights" came out "certain unalienable rights," and to this day no one knows who suggested the elegant change.

A total of 86 alterations were made. Almost 500 words were eliminated, leaving 1,337. At last, after three days of wrangling, the document was put to a vote.

Here in this hall Patrick Henry had once thundered: "I am no longer a Virginian, sir, but an American." But today the loud, sometimes bitter argument stilled, and without fanfare the vote was taken from north to south by colonies, as was the custom. On July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was adopted.

There were no trumpets blown. No one stood on his chair and cheered. The afternoon was waning and Congress had no thought of delaying the full calendar of routine business on its hands. For several hours they worked on many other problems before adjourning for the day.

Much To Lose

What kind of men were the 56 signers who adopted the Declaration of Independence and who, by their signing, committed an act of treason against the crown? To each of you, the names Franklin, Adams, Hancock and Jefferson are almost as familiar as household words. Most of us, however, know nothing of the other signers. Who were they? What happened to them?

I imagine that many of you are somewhat surprised at the names not there: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Patrick Henry. All were elsewhere.

Ben Franklin was the only really old man. Eighteen were under 40; three were in their 20s. Of the 56 almost half - 24 - were judges and lawyers. Eleven were merchants, nine were landowners and farmers, and the remaining 12 were doctors, ministers, and politicians.

With only a few exceptions, such as Samuel Adams of Massachusetts, these were men of substantial property. All but two had families. The vast majority were men of education and standing in their communities. They had economic security as few men had in the 18th Century.

Each had more to lose from revolution than he had to gain by it. John Hancock, one of the richest men in America, already had a price of 500 pounds on his head. He signed in enormous letters so that his Majesty could now read his name without glasses and could now double the reward. Ben Franklin wryly noted: "Indeed we must all hang together, otherwise we shall most assuredly hang separately."

Fat Benjamin Harrison of Virginia told tiny Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts: "With me it will all be over in a minute, but you, you will be dancing on air an hour after I am gone."

These men knew what they risked. The penalty for treason was death by hanging. And remember, a great British fleet was already at anchor in New York Harbor.

They were sober men. There were no dreamy-eyed intellectuals or draft card burners here. They were far from hot-eyed fanatics yammering for an explosion. They simply asked for the status quo. It was change they resisted. It was equality with the mother country they desired. It was taxation with representation they sought. They were all conservatives, yet they rebelled.

It was principle, not property, that had brought these men to Philadelphia. Two of them became presidents of the United States. Seven of them became state governors. One died in office as vice president of the United States. Several would go on to be US Senators. One, the richest man in America, in 1828 founded the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. One, a delegate from Philadelphia, was the only real poet, musician and philosopher of the signers. (It was he, Francis Hopkinson not Betsy Ross who designed the United States flag.)

Richard Henry Lee, a delegate from Virginia, had introduced the resolution to adopt the Declaration of Independence in June of 1776. He was prophetic in his concluding remarks: "Why then sir, why do we longer delay? Why still deliberate? Let this happy day give birth to an American Republic. Let her arise not to devastate and to conquer but to reestablish the reign of peace and law.

"The eyes of Europe are fixed upon us. She demands of us a living example of freedom that may exhibit a contrast in the felicity of the citizen to the ever-increasing tyranny which desolates her polluted shores. She invites us to prepare an asylum where the unhappy may find solace, and the persecuted repost.

"If we are not this day wanting in our duty, the names of the American Legislatures of 1776 will be placed by posterity at the side of all of those whose memory has been and ever will be dear to virtuous men and good citizens."

Though the resolution was formally adopted July 4, it was not until July 8 that two of the states authorized their delegates to sign, and it was not until August 2 that the signers met at Philadelphia to actually put their names to the Declaration.

William Ellery, delegate from Rhode Island, was curious to see the signers' faces as they committed this supreme act of personal courage. He saw some men sign quickly, "but in no face was he able to discern real fear." Stephan Hopkins, Ellery's colleague from Rhode Island, was a man past 60. As he signed with a shaking pen, he declared: "My hand trembles, but my heart does not."


"Most Glorious Service"

Even before the list was published, the British marked down every member of Congress suspected of having put his name to treason. All of them became the objects of vicious manhunts. Some were taken. Some, like Jefferson, had narrow escapes. All who had property or families near British strongholds suffered.

  • Francis Lewis, New York delegate saw his home plundered -- and his estates in what is now Harlem -- completely destroyed by British Soldiers. Mrs. Lewis was captured and treated with great brutality. Though she was later exchanged for two British prisoners through the efforts of Congress, she died from the effects of her abuse.
  • William Floyd, another New York delegate, was able to escape with his wife and children across Long Island Sound to Connecticut, where they lived as refugees without income for seven years. When they came home they found a devastated ruin.
  • Philips Livingstone had all his great holdings in New York confiscated and his family driven out of their home. Livingstone died in 1778 still working in Congress for the cause.
  • Louis Morris, the fourth New York delegate, saw all his timber, crops, and livestock taken. For seven years he was barred from his home and family.
  • John Hart of Trenton, New Jersey, risked his life to return home to see his dying wife. Hessian soldiers rode after him, and he escaped in the woods. While his wife lay on her deathbed, the soldiers ruined his farm and wrecked his homestead. Hart, 65, slept in caves and woods as he was hunted across the countryside. When at long last, emaciated by hardship, he was able to sneak home, he found his wife had already been buried, and his 13 children taken away. He never saw them again. He died a broken man in 1779, without ever finding his family.
  • Dr. John Witherspoon, signer, was president of the College of New Jersey, later called Princeton. The British occupied the town of Princeton, and billeted troops in the college. They trampled and burned the finest college library in the country.
  • Judge Richard Stockton, another New Jersey delegate signer, had rushed back to his estate in an effort to evacuate his wife and children. The family found refuge with friends, but a Tory sympathizer betrayed them. Judge Stockton was pulled from bed in the night and brutally beaten by the arresting soldiers. Thrown into a common jail, he was deliberately starved. Congress finally arranged for Stockton's parole, but his health was ruined. The judge was released as an invalid, when he could no longer harm the British cause.He returned home to find his estate looted and did not live to see the triumph of the Revolution. His family was forced to live off charity.
  • Robert Morris, merchant prince of Philadelphia, delegate and signer, met Washington's appeals and pleas for money year after year. He made and raised arms and provisions which made it possible for Washington to cross the Delaware at Trenton. In the process he lost 150 ships at sea, bleeding his own fortune and credit almost dry.
  • George Clymer, Pennsylvania signer, escaped with his family from their home, but their property was completely destroyed by the British in the Germantown and Brandywine campaigns.
  • Dr. Benjamin Rush, also from Pennsylvania, was forced to flee to Maryland. As a heroic surgeon with the army, Rush had several narrow escapes.
  • John Martin, a Tory in his views previous to the debate, lived in a strongly loyalist area of Pennsylvania. When he came out for independence, most of his neighbors and even some of his relatives ostracized him. He was a sensitive and troubled man, and many believed this action killed him. When he died in 1777, his last words to his tormentors were: "Tell them that they will live to see the hour when they shall acknowledge it [the signing] to have been the most glorious service that I have ever rendered to my country."
  • William Ellery, Rhode Island delegate, saw his property and home burned to the ground.
  • Thomas Lynch, Jr., South Carolina delegate, had his health broken from privation and exposures while serving as a company commander in the military. His doctors ordered him to seek a cure in the West Indies and on the voyage, he and his young bride were drowned at sea.
  • Edward Rutledge, Arthur Middleton, and Thomas Heyward, Jr., the other three South Carolina signers, were taken by the British in the siege of Charleston. They were carried as prisoners of war to St. Augustine, Florida, where they were singled out for indignities. They were exchanged at the end of the war, the British in the meantime having completely devastated their large landholdings and estates.
  • Thomas Nelson, signer of Virginia, was at the front in command of the Virginia military forces. With British General Charles Cornwallis in Yorktown, fire from 70 heavy American guns began to destroy Yorktown piece by piece. Lord Cornwallis and his staff moved their headquarters into Nelson's palatial home. While American cannonballs were making a shambles of the town, the house of Governor Nelson remained untouched. Nelson turned in rage to the American gunners and asked, "Why do you spare my home?"They replied, "Sir, out of respect to you." Nelson cried, "Give me the cannon!" and fired on his magnificent home himself, smashing it to bits. But Nelson's sacrifice was not quite over. He had raised $2 million for the Revolutionary cause by pledging his own estates. When the loans came due, a newer peacetime Congress refused to honor them, and Nelson's property was forfeited. He was never reimbursed. He died, impoverished, a few years later at the age of 50.

Lives, Fortunes, Honor

Of those 56 who signed the Declaration of Independence, nine died of wounds or hardships during the war. Five were captured and imprisoned, in each case with brutal treatment. Several lost wives, sons or entire families. One lost his 13 children. Two wives were brutally treated. All were at one time or another the victims of manhunts and driven from their homes. Twelve signers had their homes completely burned. Seventeen lost everything they owned. Yet not one defected or went back on his pledged word. Their honor, and the nation they sacrificed so much to create is still intact.

And, finally, there is the New Jersey signer, Abraham Clark.

He gave two sons to the officer corps in the Revolutionary Army. They were captured and sent to that infamous British prison hulk afloat in New York Harbor known as the hell ship Jersey, where 11,000 American captives were to die. The younger Clarks were treated with a special brutality because of their father. One was put in solitary and given no food. With the end almost in sight, with the war almost won, no one could have blamed Abraham Clark for acceding to the British request when they offered him his sons' lives if he would recant and come out for the King and Parliament. The utter despair in this man's heart, the anguish in his very soul, must reach out to each one of us down through 200 years with his answer: "No."

The 56 signers of the Declaration Of Independence proved by their every deed that they made no idle boast when they composed the most magnificent curtain line in history. "And for the support of this Declaration with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor."


RUSH EPILOGUE: My friends, I know you have a copy of the Declaration of Independence somewhere around the house - in an old history book (newer ones may well omit it), an encyclopedia, or one of those artificially aged "parchments" we all got in school years ago. I suggest that each of you take the time this month to read through the text of the Declaration, one of the most noble and beautiful political documents in human history.

There is no more profound sentence than this: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness..."

These are far more than mere poetic words. The underlying ideas that infuse every sentence of this treatise have sustained this nation for more than two centuries. They were forged in the crucible of great sacrifice. They are living words that spring from and satisfy the deepest cries for liberty in the human spirit.

"Sacred honor" isn't a phrase we use much these days, but every American life is touched by the bounty of this, the Founders' legacy. It is freedom, tested by blood, and watered with tears.



Post settings Labels Rush Limbaugh Published on 10/22/18, 8:42 PM Central Daylight Time Permalink Location Search Description Options

Greek Lesson Mark 6:45 - Walking on Water



Parser - tells us the I.D. of the word

Lenski's Mark Commentary - download as a PDF



Mark 6:45 και ευθεως ηναγκασεν τους μαθητας αυτου εμβηναι εις το πλοιον και προαγειν εις το περαν προς βηθσαιδαν εως αυτος απολυση τον οχλον
a new baino, up, down, em

46 και αποταξαμενος αυτοις απηλθεν εις το ορος προσευξασθαι

47 και οψιας γενομενης, ην το πλοιον εν μεσω της θαλασσης, και αυτος μονος επι της γης

Lenski, Mark, p. 272
Mark alone states that Jesus saw the disciples. It was night, a storm was raging, hence this was super natural sight. The mention of the late evening in v. 47 should not mislead us into thinking that it was then that Jesus saw the disciples since the sky was still light enough for this. Jesus was engaged in prayer until toward the fourth watch. At that time he saw the disciples "distressed in the rowing." When they started before dark, all was fair and beautiful, and, experienced sailors as most of them were, they hoisted sail and expected a pleasant voyage to their destination. But this soon changed. One of those sudden storms, for which this lake is noted, lying, as it does, between high ridges, descended and swept over the water and lashed it into furious waves. They hurriedly furled the sail, took to the oars (Mark alone mentions the rowing), and held the boat straight against the wind to keep it from being swamped. Matthew writes liter ally; "the boat was being put to the test by torture"; Mark uses the same participle When referring to the disciples. Matthew attributes the test to the waves' lashing the boat, Mark to the disciples' laboring in rowing. Both are graphic. "The wind was against them" is added to explain the distress in rowing, they made next to no progress.

48 και ειδεν αυτους βασανιζομενους εν τω ελαυνειν, ην γαρ ο ανεμος εναντιος αυτοις, και περι τεταρτην φυλακην της νυκτος ερχεται προς αυτους περιπατων επι της θαλασσης, και ηθελεν παρελθειν αυτους

49 οι δε ιδοντες αυτον περιπατουντα επι της θαλασσης εδοξαν φαντασμα ειναι και ανεκραξαν

50 παντες γαρ αυτον ειδον και εταραχθησαν και ευθεως ελαλησεν μετ αυτων και λεγει αυτοις θαρσειτε εγω ειμι μη φοβεισθε

I AM - the Name of God, Exodus 3, John 8  or - "It's me"?

51 και ανεβη προς αυτους εις το πλοιον και εκοπασεν ο ανεμος και λιαν εκ περισσου εν εαυτοις εξισταντο και εθαυμαζον

52 ου γαρ συνηκαν επι τοις αρτοις ην γαρ η καρδια αυτων πεπωρωμενη
osteoporosis

53 και διαπερασαντες ηλθον επι την γην γενησαρετ και προσωρμισθησαν

54 και εξελθοντων αυτων εκ του πλοιου, ευθεως επιγνοντες αυτον

55 περιδραμοντες ολην την περιχωρον εκεινην ηρξαντο επι τοις κραββατοις τους κακως εχοντας περιφερειν οπου ηκουον οτι εκει εστιν

56 και οπου αν εισεπορευετο εις κωμας η πολεις η αγρους - εν ταις αγοραις ετιθουν τους ασθενουντας και παρεκαλουν αυτον ινα καν του κρασπεδου του ιματιου αυτου αψωνται και οσοι αν ηπτοντο αυτου εσωζοντο


The Second Coming - WELS Will Be First


The three synod presidents were discussing their next project with
ELCA when the topic of the Second Coming came up. That was rather shocking, because they seldom talked about religion.

LCMS boss Matt Harrison said, "Our members will be first at the Second Coming, because we are the biggest part of the Olde Synodical Conference."

ELS Mini-SP countered, "No we will be first, because of our Ulrik Koren heritage."

But WELS leader Schroeder ended the discussion, "No, WELS will be, because even the NIV says - 'The dead in Christ will rise first.'"

 "The largest distinctively Lutheran conference" in Kenosha County, Wisconsin. Lavishly funded, sparsely attended.

Tuesday, July 2, 2019

This Sounds So Much Like the Calvinist Objective Justification Salesmen



My critique is that often "faith" gets defined as something we look for within ourselves; rather than that which is outside of ourselves that evokes our response of trust. It becomes MY faith in Jesus Christ; without fully recognizing that whatever faith or trust we have comes because it has been called out or evoked in us by the power of the Holy Spirit. 

Then there are those who will have basically a checkoff list of things one has to agree to in order to have the correct "faith". These might include:

  • 6-day creation
  • a real ark and flood
  • the virgin Mary (sometimes eternally a virgin)
  • the resurrection (which has to be in physical, bodily resurrection)
  • a specific way of talking/believing about the Real Presence in the bread and wine
  • agreeing with everything in the Book of Concord for some Lutherans
  • and so on.

All this means looking into one's own brain for what one might agree with or not. Since sin has been defined as "being turned in on oneself," this understanding of faith - looking inwards - becomes sinful. 

It seems to me both theologically and from the Greek terms, that "faith" should mean, looking to Jesus. It is relying on his trustworthiness; his faithfulness; rather than looking inward at my faith. 

If we have any faith, Luther states that the Holy Spirit gets all the credit. Luther does not address the question of those who don't appear to have faith. Didn't the Holy Spirit call them? Could they refuse to answer? Is that like imagining a fetus deciding, "I'm not going to be born," if salvation is seen as a new birth?

Can one trust the faithfulness of Jesus to us sinners even if one questions some of the doctrines I listed above?

***

GJ - The author is not important because this generic nonsense is so common among the Objective Justification donkeys and Leftist Mainline apostates.

The herd of jackasses braying these solemn - and unsupported - pronouncements can only repeat each other's noise. They have no idea what faith is and only mock what they imagine.

Thus the OJ heroes warn people away from faith, which they see as dangerous, something to avoid.

Claiming Luther for this eructation is as absurd as Jay Webber wasting 50 pages on Luther teaching a dogma that entered Lutherdom chiefly through Halle's rationalistic Pietism, almost 200 years later. And yet he recognized and supported Rambach's OJ interpretation of 1 Timothy 3:16 - "the world was absolved when Jesus rose from the dead." But - the verse says nothing of the sort. Nor does Romans 4:25.

Full Name: Luther, Martin, 1483-1546
Birth Year: 1483
Death Year: 1546



Full Name: Rambach, J. J. (Johann Jacob), 1693-1735
Birth Year: 1693
Death Year: 1735

"On Oct. 27, 1712, he matriculated at the University of Halle as a student of medicine, but soon turned his attention to theology. He became specially interested in the study of the Old Testament under J. Michaelis."

1911 Encyclopedia Britannica - Rationalism
"The first great rationalist leader was [Halle's] J. S. Semler (q.v.), who held that true religion springs from the individual soul, and attacked the authority of the Bible in a comprehensive spirit of criticism. He ultimately reached a point at which the Bible became for him simply one of many ancient documents. At the same time he did not impugn the authority of the Church, which he regarded as useful in maintaining external unity. Among those who followed in Semler's path were Gruner Ernesti, J. Michaelis, Griesbach, J. G. Eichhorn."



Aroma-Therapy from the Jackson Rose Gardens


One doctor's office likes to see us on the appointment list because we always bring interesting and fragrant arrangements, not unlike today's offering.

I decided to list my favorite fragrant plants currently growing at the Jackson Rose Gardens.



First Choice - Clethra, aka Summersweet, aka Sugar Spice and Ruby Spice
This shrub is modest in the size with small flowers, but exudes two fragrances whether in bloom or not. The primary one is cinnamon, but the secondary one is sweet. Butterflies and beneficial insects love it.

The leaves are raggy, hency the name. Rugosa roses are the easiest to grow, immune to most problems, very old fashioned, for the nostalgic types.

The blooms are old fashioned but very fragrant.

 Many medical people do not realize the rose hips (seed pods) are the source of Vitamin C pills.

Most Potent Fragrance - Rugosa Rose
This rose is homely and thorny, but quite rugged. Plant it and forget it. Some like the big hips, which look like small apples;  apples belong to the rose family. The bloom has the most potent fragrance I have experienced.

 The top three roses in fragrance almost make the eyes water.


Mr. Lincoln and Fragrant Cloud
Close to Rugosa in fragrance but far more attractive - Mr. Lincoln and Fragrant Cloud. Both fit the description of filling the room from one bloom.

  No one would want chaste tree cologne, but the oil is expensive and sold over the Net. The aroma reminds me of Vicks.


Chaste Tree
Some might list this as interesting, in contrast to the above. The shrub can be quite tall but also tolerates plenty of pruning. The aroma from the entire plant is medicinal. Bees love the beautiful blue flowers. My neighbor asked, "What is that?"



Mountain Mint
This easily grows shoulder high. Insects can grow wild around it, as I saw in the DC gardens. In case the casual observer wonders what it is, the mintiness fills the air and the bees work over the tiny flowers.


I am not sure which plant contributes the most, but our Butterfly Bush (not this hedge) seemed to fill the air with a grape jelly aroma. We also have various berry plants to feed the critters - Honeysuckle berries, Beauty Berry, Raspberry, Blackberry, Wild Strawberry, and Poke Weed berries.