Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Cannot Spell Plagiarist - Does He Know What It Is?
Starting To Think Anonymous Is Glende



http://welsdocument.blogspot.com/2015/02/accessible-worship-how-did-it-start-and.html?showComment=1424908523925

You can try and take the high ground of just trying to tell the truth but I and others won't bite. You continued to call your pastor a plagerist (sic). Loudly, Rudely, Publicly, You pick the adjective. The voters of the congregation did not agree with you. You continued to call your pastor a plagerist (sic) and again I will let you pick the adjective but neither the congregation or district agreed with you. You don't get to select a different truth than the rest of the congregation or district. You can either submit to the will of the body or leave as a testament of the truth.

***

GJ - Here is a rundown on Glende from 2010.

More on Glende and his fake blog.

Groeschel taught Glende how to plagiarize. Yes, Groeschel is a plagiarist.

Various Examples of WELS Plagiarism.

Anonymouser7 speaks the truth.




Second Mid-Week Vespers Service, 2015



Second Mid-Week Lenten Vespers, 2015


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Worship, 7 PM Central Time 

The Hymn #649    Jesus Savior Pilot Me                3.80
The Order of Vespers                                             p. 41
The Psalmody                   Psalm 23                    p. 128
The Lections                            The Passion History
                                                 John 6

The Sermon Hymn #370   My Hope Is Built           3.70

The Sermon –     I AM That Bread of Life
 
The Prayers
The Lord’s Prayer
The Collect for Grace                                            p. 45

The Hymn #653        Now the Light Has Gone Away               3.30

John 6:28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?
29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.
30 They said therefore unto him, What sign shewest thou then, that we may see, and believe thee? what dost thou work?
31 Our fathers did eat manna in the desert; as it is written, He gave them bread from heaven to eat.
32 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Moses gave you not that bread from heaven; but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven.
33 For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world.
34 Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread.
35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.
36 But I said unto you, That ye also have seen me, and believe not.
37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.
39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.
40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.
41 The Jews then murmured at him, because he said, I am the bread which came down from heaven.
42 And they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?
43 Jesus therefore answered and said unto them, Murmur not among yourselves.
44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
45 It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me.
46 Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father.
47 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.
48 I am that bread of life.
49 Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.
50 This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
52 The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?
53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.
57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.
58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.


I AM That Bread of Life

John 6:28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? 29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

The seven I AM passages are very important for the Gospels. The Fourth Gospel clearly supplements the first three and assumes knowledge of those Gospels. John's Gospel could be seen as an elaboration on the others and a commentary on them. Since the author was an apostle and close to Jesus, even taking care of His mother in Ephesus, the importance of the added material can hardly be emphasized enough.
John's Gospel is both sermonic and poetic. The Gospel is more sermonic because the readers or hearers already know most of the narrative. The sermons are poetic, reflecting Hebrew poetry and a style that makes them easy to memorize. Very few Bibles line them out like poetry, but they clearly have that the kind of poetry we see and memorize easily in the Psalms.
The theme of John's Gospel is faith. The noun and verb are the most frequent in the New Testament and very frequent in this Gospel. 
The verses above are clearly in complete harmony with the end of the Gospel and John 16:8ff. The foundational sin is not believing. Therefore, this Gospel was written especially to promote and nurture faith.
Believing is forgiveness, and forgiveness is salvation and eternal life. No one can separate this theme from any section of John's Gospel.
Luther knew this Gospel well and saw through the efforts of others to supplant faith, to make it secondary, and insert their form of works, which eliminates grace.
Why are people less gracious today? They do not hear about true grace. They hear the word endlessly, but not the meaning. Grace plus works is not grace, it is the Law.
This little exchange is very powerful, which is why the false teachers have to ignore it. Doing the works of God - that does not mean building another cathedral or funding another charity. 
This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.
That is where the Gospel begins and ends, not without fruit. Not at all. The fruit of faith is the only good, wholesome and spiritual fruit. But the tree is not fruitful without faith.
The Father-Son relationship is constantly emphasized in this Gospel. Faith means believe in God the Father, Who sent the Only-Begotten Son. That sounds odd to some, to say that. Don't we all know it? No.
The foundation of disbelief, apostasy, starts with "I cannot believe in a god who lets his son die on a cross." The modernist theologians cannot get rid of the cross, so they re-invent it and make it a symbol of Jesus' transparency, so we can see God (whatever that means!) or some other rationalistic nonsense, spoken with great piety and emotion.
30 They said therefore unto him, What sign shewest thou then, that we may see, and believe thee? what dost thou work? 31 Our fathers did eat manna in the desert; as it is written, He gave them bread from heaven to eat.
The transition is very telling - doubt. What miracle do you have to prove who you are, that we may see and believe? In other words - we do not believe, but we have a miracle for you to try for us.
This is always the plea of doubters - God must do something they demand, to prove He is God. For that reason their prayers will not be answered.
This is what sets up the sermon by Jesus. They demand manna, which is a minor miracle for God, but Jesus is the Bread of Life and tells them so.
First He defined the true Bread of Life -

32 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Moses gave you not that bread from heaven; but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven.
33 For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world.
Then He said clearly - 
34 Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread.
35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.
36 But I said unto you, That ye also have seen me, and believe not.
37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.
As anyone can see, this is becoming a clash between teaching faith and the doubting reaction.
39 And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.
40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.
41 The Jews then murmured at him, because he said, I am the bread which came down from heaven.
42 And they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?
43 Jesus therefore answered and said unto them, Murmur not among yourselves.
44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
The message is one of comfort, and yet it irritates those who do not believe. This is a litmus test - If someone halts and does not like part of the message, then he does not believe what Jesus said. There is no book, essay, or statement outside the Bible that trumps what Jesus said here.
We can also see how the simple words of Jesus (simple in vocabulary and grammar, profound in meaning) soar higher and higher as He speaks. 
Jesus gathered the crowds with His profound revelation of Himself as the source of righteousness. The people were told they could never be as pious, as scholarly, and as strict as the Pharisees. They could never have that kind of righteousness. And Jesus told them that righteousness meant nothing - they only needed to believe in the Father Who Sent Him to receive forgiveness, eternal life, and salvation. 
This is the grace others praise but seldom teach. Their law demands always creep in, even when they talk grace and tack on faith as a supplement to their New Moses talk (coaching, achieving goals, that kind of baloney). 
This chapter is a sermon that we can read and meditate upon. One measure of the Gospel is how we react - or rather it is a measure of us. If we find comfort and peace in these Words of Jesus, then we believe the message as from God Himself, as it is. If we fight against it, doubt it, demand proofs, or reject parts of it, then the Spirit is convicting us of unbelief.
Anyone who has trouble with John's Gospel is being convicted of unbelief by the Holy Spirit. The answer is more Gospel of John, more meditation upon the Fourth Gospel, prayerful study of faithful authors to help. Any Luther sermon is worth two dozen good books, and he would say better than his own scholarly works. The sermon is everything.
The entire Bible is a sermon about Jesus.

The Seven I AM Sermons in the Gospel of John: Mid-Week Lenten Services




  1. John 6:48 I am that bread of life. KJV
  2. John 8:12 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life. KJV
  3. John 10:9 I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture. KJV
  4. John 10:11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep. KJV
  5. John 11:25 Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: KJV
  6. John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. KJV
  7. John 15:1 I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. KJV

The Key Is Studying the Facts, Which Requires Some Work and an Exercise in Critical Thinking



http://welsdocument.blogspot.com/2015/02/accessible-worship-how-did-it-start-and.html?showComment=1424883347210

This is fascinating. Mr. Techlin and Pastor Lidtke have no problem identifying themselves openly. The other side (and even a seeming supporter, "Melanchthon") hide their identities. Hmmmm - who to believe? Easy answer, huh?! Also, I understand and appreciate Warren's desire for a "summary" from Rick. But, frankly, such would be very difficult to do, even for him at this point, I suspect. Those who want to be fully informed about this tragic incident must simply spend the time and make the effort to read everything that has been published. The same should be said concerning many other situations. I think those that make this effort will see a definite pattern, and it will no doubt disturb them, as well it should. The state of leadership on the district levels in the synods is in a sad way in many cases. As Tony would say, "'Nuf said!"


  1. Anonymous,

    After my letter was published by another blogger, I was encouraged by WELS pastors and other laymen to go public myself which I eventually did.

    However, the issue here is not whether I said anything publicly, but rather your assertion that I did things out of order and rudely. You said I "got up at almost every meeting to accuse his pastor of plagiarism." That is a false statement. It is not even remotely true. But even if I had, so what? Do we kick people out for telling the truth?

    I followed the rules to the best of my ability, and I endeavored to document and prove everything I said. You should read my letters, and deal with the issues I raised instead of complaining about how I allegedly raised them.

    Even a rude messenger can deliver the truth. Your ultra sensitivity to imagined rudeness tells me you have not read very many of Luther's works. Unlike the Northern Wisconsin District, Luther did not confuse the old covenant of choosing life (Deuteronomy 30:19-20) with the new and better covenant of Jesus Christ (Hebrews 8:4-13). "For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion to look for a second." (Hebrews 8:7). Christ made the old covenant obsolete because he established a new covenant which is by grace through faith, and this not from ourselves. (Ephesians 2:8). The people who terminated fellowship with me were teaching that Christians could choose to believe, and they cited Deuteronomy 30:19-20 (the old covenant) as proof. No one has ever tried to explain to me how this does not conflate the old and the new covenants, and the law with the gospel. They just said, you disagree with us, therefore you are out of our fellowship.

    Here is a blog post I wrote about choosing to believe:
    https://vdma.wordpress.com/2012/08/27/can-christians-choose-to-believe-gods-word/

    To my knowledge, no one has tried to refute that. Moses told us to obey the law and live (Deuteronomy 30:16), but the writer to the Hebrews says that Christ established a new covenant based on better promises, promises based on grace alone.

    Anonymous said that I was merely removed from membership, and not terminated from doctrinal fellowship. However, my brother was removed from membership at the same meeting that I was terminated from fellowship. So there is a difference. That has also been documented, and anyone who cares to know the truth can discover it.

    For anyone who wants to deal with the actual issues of doctrine and theology, I have presented plenty of documentation on my own blog. I do not plan to comment here any longer.

    Finally, I do not regret speaking out according to my conscience. I endeavored to tell the truth, and to document everything I said. I am sorry if someone got the impression I was being rude, but that is completely irrelevant. The truth is what matters. Christ is what matters. Because of sin, the truth sometimes hurts, but that is why Christ came, so that the truth can also bring joy.

    Sincerely,
    Rick Techlin

Heavy Drinkers Have the Lowest IQs - Imagine What This Does to the Synodical IQ!


Heavy drinkers have the lowest IQs, study claims

New findings show a link between a lower IQ and and alcohol consumption amongst young men


People with low IQs are more likely to consume higher amounts of alcohol than those with higher IQs, a new study has claimed.
The study, which was carried out by researchers at the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden, surveyed 49,321 Swedish men who were born between 1949 to 1951 and were conscripted for Swedish military service from 1969 to 1971. IQ tests done upon conscription, alcohol intake, pattern of drinking, tobacco use, and medical conditions were all examined.
The results showed that men with lower results on their IQ test consumed higher levels of alcohol, leading the team to conclude that "a higher IQ results in healthier lifestyle choices".
Sara Sjölund a student at the Institutet and corresponding author for the study, said that this was the first study to find "consistent" links between "cognitive ability and alcohol-related probems (sic)".



Some Extra Entertainment


http://welsdocument.blogspot.com/2015/02/accessible-worship-how-did-it-start-and.html?showComment=1424876718207#c2588254180876143333


  • I have the right to ask Mr. Techlin to summarize in his own words what the doctrinal errors he was alleging to have been taught in his congregation without having to wade through 100 pages of documentation. Clarity is not always the result of prolixity. WHAT was/were the errors, please!
  • And likewise, he has the right to refer you to the many well-documented and thoroughly-composed statements he has also made on this issue, too, rather than submit to whatever "trap" you are attempting to lay for him here.

    I hope he does. 

    For anyone else reading--if you also have some interest in this question, but a bit more initiative than Mr. Malach, I encourage you to see Mr. Techlin's blog (and the links therein for more details) at: http://vdma.wordpress.com/2011/10/09/church-status/

  • GJ - Prolixity seems to be Warren Malach's biggest problem. No, reading comprehension is. He has not even read Lenski, so he sits at the computer in his mother's basement and pronounces judgment on a universally respected Biblical and doctrinal authority.
  • Malach is posting. All rise!
  • Additional Reading for the Techlin Case - When Glende and Ski Gave a Member The Left Foot of Fellowship For Telling the Truth about Plagiarism.
    Some Ichabod Links





    Wednesday, February 25, 2015

    Additional Reading for the Techlin Case


    Since a few people have asked for additional information regarding the Rick Techlin case that is being thoroughly discussed on another thread, the below links should answer most of those questions.

    Please see this post for all the comments pertaining to that discussion. People are giving a lot of valuable insight to the case.

    As we come across additional documentation from both sides, we will add it to the list.


    Reading Material: 

    Straw Bale Garden Getting Ready - Making the Simple Complicated

    Straw is messy to transport, but it smells great
    and is inexpensive, even at Lowe's rates.




    Joel Karsten is probably single biggest force behind straw bale gardens (SBGs). Long ago, he had a lot where nothing was going to grow without extensive renovation, digging, etc. He did not have money to build raised beds, which is the standard solution. He recalled the old straw bales on the farm with weeds growing in great abundance from them.

    Karsten reasoned that straw bales could be a quick solution to the cost and work of creating raised beds. He created a career out of a need, and many are grateful. However, he never got over his agriculture degree and turned the simple solution into a complicated one.

    Here is my problem. Karsten recalled the broken or wet straw bales fostering tremendous growth on their own, since this was pre-SBG intricacies. And yet he has gardeners adding all kinds of amendments to the straw bales. I love the elaborate frames he builds around and above them. Scratch that off my list, because frame-building fails the Maynard G. Krebs Principle (too much work) and cost-effectiveness (how much is that going to gouge my rose budget?)

    I plant tomatoes in the ground with no support and fish through the leaves to obtain the fruit.
    Frames are the result of giving a redneck tools and a budget.

    A bale of straw is big rectangular solid of neutral growing material. It is not hay, loaded with seeds, but simply the hollow stems left from cutting wheat, an ideal bedding material for animals, because it is absorbent, and also for plants.

    To get the most from the least work and expense, we need a 3-D view of the garden, above and below the surface. Perhaps straw does not have much nutrition for the plant roots, just a soft, warm, absorbent bed for the plant roots. But what delivers nutrition to the roots? Short answer - fungi. They are not only the primary decomposers but also the tiny tubular trains delivering exactly what the roots demand in exchange for carbon, which they cannot make for themselves.

    Thus the straw bales, once soaked and sitting in the sunshine, develop the decomposition process, which means fungi and soil creatures invading the bales. So the sunshine will deliver the energy needed by the plants to perform their magic below the surface, sending roots (more importantly, root hairs) to barter for what they want in exchange for what they need.

    The gardener can sprinkle anything he wants on or in the bales - the real work is microscopic, with the earthworms and visible soil creatures giving evidence of the microbic population explosion fostered by moisture. Nothing we use for amendments will change a plant until those elements are converted for use by the plant.

    Since the fungi obey the chemical directives of the plant roots, sprinkling stuff on the surface has the same effect as blowing on dice before rolling them in a game of Monopoly. The elements of Creation obey the software implanted in them, and they work without complaining or slowing, unless we fail to help where help is needed.

    I have seen the local gardening pros do this with their bushes,
    line the entire margin with a row of flowers.
    It is easier right in the bale and provides more food for beneficial insects.


    Fun with Bales
    Karsten brought up the idea of planting flowers on the sides of the bales. Potatoes can be growing in the bales, strawberries on top of the bales, and borage on the side. Borage is also called bee bread, so it has the advantage of attracting the bees while using walls of the bales to grow.