Thursday, December 20, 2018

Fourth Midweek Advent Service


Mid-Week Advent Service, 2016

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson



The Hymn # 240                    Father Most Holy

The Order of Vespers                                             p. 41
The Psalmody            Psalm   2                         p. 124
The First Lection                  
The Second Lection       
The Sermon Hymn #61      Hark a Thrilling Voice
         

The Great Miracle - God Incarnate - God in the Flesh



The Prayers and Lord’s Prayer                         p. 44
The Collect for Peace                                           p. 45
The Benediction                                                   p. 45
The Hymn # 558                All Praise to Thee

Sermon - The Great Miracle - God Incarnate - God in the Flesh

Isaiah 7:10 Moreover the Lord spake again unto Ahaz, saying,
11 Ask thee a sign of the Lord thy God; ask it either in the depth, or in the height above.
12 But Ahaz said, I will not ask, neither will I tempt the Lord.
13 And he said, Hear ye now, O house of David; Is it a small thing for you to weary men, but will ye weary my God also?
14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

This passage is often debated over the issue of the Virgin Birth. For some reason, the people who pretend to be shocked about rationalism and denying the Virgin Birth of Jesus forget one thing. The greatest single source of this rationalism was Halle University, which was the center of denying the truths of the Scripture and defining Justification as universal, everyone forgiven without faith.

As I have said many times before, the language alone of the passage states that this will be a great miracle, even greater than the one promised by the prophet. When the hypocritical king denies any need for a miracle, the response is extremely harsh, ending with God Himself will give this miracle.

Based upon the language alone, this miracle must be gigantic, a miracle of miracles, so the Halle wise guys said, "Just a young woman giving birth to a baby." And their fellow wise guys have said the same thing ever since.

As dense as that is, that rationalism pales in comparison with the even greater miracle - God in the flesh. Immanuel can only mean that. El is for God, and Immanu means "with us."

So the issue is not proving what the passage says. The Hebrew word almah means virgin, and the explanation goes beyond that, transcends that to say - God with us - his name.

One part of this miracle reflects upon the other. This unique birth to come would be the marker of the Messiah coming to the world. Because it was far beyond man's reason, that also signaled that the Son of God would not act according to man's material desires, but fulfill God's will.

This is a good example of what Luther taught about God's Word. He observed that men claim they cannot believe what is taught in the Scriptures because they defy human reason. But if man could comprehend one thing, like Creation, or the Incarnation (God with us; God in the flesh), we would not need the Bible at all.

The Bible reveals mysteries through the teaching of the Holy Spirit. We can support those mysteries through our observations, but teaching comes by revelation, not by adding up our evidence.

For example, Creation is a mystery. No one can explain how it happened, and every effort by man falls apart. However, we can see the truth in that mystery when we observe the way everything around us is perfectly times so that animal and plant life work together in every possible way.

I have a plant that sows its seed easily, and in doing so provides food for the beneficial insects all summer - Fever Few. It is also a medicine for headaches. I planted two of them this fall, and every time we have a thaw after a hard freeze, the plant greens up and grows again. Not even the mints are doing that. This has to be design rather than random chance. And it can be multiplied thousands of times over in anyone's yard.

Is Jesus the Son of God? His resurrection has never been refuted, and the greatest skeptics have to agree. Of course we can always find some so blind they have to deny everything. But this has withstood the attacks of the rationalists, whose reasoning falls apart with only a little research.

In a way, the attacks were good, because they made many researches go back to the sources to show the wise guys were wrong - about the Star of Bethlehem, about the early date and great reliability of the Fourth Gospel.

What began as a mystery - Creation - and continued as a mystery - the Promise of a Savior, God in the flesh, the Virgin Birth - culminated in Christ dying for the sins of the world - the Atonement.




Parser link

Lenski, p. 382:
The sum and substance of true religion is fellowship with God. Hence any number of men claim to have such fellowship, in particular the heretics who deny that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and that his blood alone places us into and maintains us in fellowship with God. That is true to this day. John's encyclical rightly lays the circle of facts centering on fellowship with God upon the great fact that Jesus Christ is the Logos of the Life, the Son of God, to which fact the apostles are witnesses. The presentation is simple, clear as crystal, complete as a unit. John ranges the facts that are pertinent to fellowship with God together so that the readers may at once see that they are truly in this essential fellowship and may also note who is and who is not in it. The presentation of this group of facts is an assurance to the readers and at the same time strikes at the liars who deny the deity of Jesus and the power of his blood.


τεκνια μου ταυτα γραφω υμιν ινα μη αμαρτητε, και εαν τις αμαρτη, παρακλητον εχομεν προς τον πατερα ιησουν χριστον δικαιον
Very basic simple Greek. Why? In a metro area, many know Greek but some only basic Greek for trade.

και αυτος ιλασμος εστιν περι των αμαρτιων ημων ου περι των ημετερων δε μονον αλλα και περι ολου του κοσμου
propitiation?ιλασμος - by placing the Greek word in Google and adding Strong, we get an instant list of occurrences and possible meanings.
και εν τουτω γινωσκομεν οτι εγνωκαμεν αυτον εαν τας εντολας αυτου τηρωμεν
obey commands or guard/observe them? The verb is used in the sense of guarding a jail cell. 
kappa is often the sign of the perfect tense.
ο λεγων εγνωκα αυτον, και τας εντολας αυτου μη τηρων, ψευστης εστιν και εν τουτω η αληθεια ουκ εστιν
The positive and the negative statements are basic to the Christian Faith. Note that the UOJists do not admit, "We are against JBFA," but say "We excommunicate those who deny our precious UOJ." That is dishonest and cowardly.
ος δ αν τηρη αυτου τον λογον,  αληθως εν τουτω η αγαπη του θεου τετελειωται; εν τουτω γινωσκομεν οτι εν αυτω εσμεν
The Greeks had the brains, but we have the punctuation.
ο λεγων εν αυτω μενειν οφειλει - καθως Eκεινος περιεπατησεν - και αυτος ουτως περιπατειν
The second infinitive finishes the thought. The one saying ought to remain (John 15)  - just like Jesus - that man ought to walk thusly. Jesus is the bracketed thought, the ideal or pattern.
αδελφοι ουκ εντολην καινην γραφω υμιν, αλλ εντολην παλαιαν ην ειχετε απ αρχης; η εντολη η παλαια εστιν ο λογος ον ηκουσατε απ αρχης
Paleontology. 
παλιν εντολην καινην γραφω υμιν, ο εστιν αληθες εν αυτω και εν υμιν, οτι η σκοτια παραγεται και το φως το αληθινον ηδη φαινει

ο λεγων εν τω φωτι ειναι - και τον αδελφον αυτου μισων - εν τη σκοτια εστιν εως αρτι
John is addressing those fooled by the false teachers, who claim to be with the light and are in darkness and hate.

10 ο αγαπων τον αδελφον αυτου εν τω φωτι μενει και σκανδαλον εν αυτω ουκ εστιν
Strong Thayer for σκανδαλον. The term meant the trigger of a snare trap.

11 ο δε μισων τον αδελφον αυτου εν τη σκοτια εστιν και εν τη σκοτια περιπατει και ουκ οιδεν που υπαγει οτι η σκοτια ετυφλωσεν τους οφθαλμους αυτου

12 γραφω υμιν τεκνια οτι αφεωνται υμιν αι αμαρτιαι δια το ονομα αυτου


Dr. Lito Cruz - Math PhD and Certified Lutheran Pastor - On CFW Walther

Dr. Lito Cruz


These quotes are taken from the work of the Rev. Dr. Karl Edwin Kuenzel.

I blogged about this in here

The fanatical adoration of CF W Walther in American Lutheranism is astoundingly cultic already, so here are the results of Dr. Kunzel's evaluation:

Walther was a tremendous leader, a dynamic preacher, a powerful lecturer, and a remarkable writer. However, lest we wind up worshipping the man, as many had done with Martin Stephan, and perhaps some do with Luther, we need to be mindful of some of Walther’s deficiencies.

Walther was legalistic when it came to the matters of usury, dancing and going to the theater, life insurance, running a tavern, in-law marriage (e.g., a man marrying the sister of his deceased wife), geographical parish boundaries, the local congregation, and the pastoral office. He often made his position as if it were Scripturally based and therefore God-given doctrine, when, in fact, he was going beyond what the Bible says and turning matters of casuistry into untenable doctrines.
....
Not only did Walther use terms that were readily misunderstood by others, but another cause for his naevi [faults], according to his student August Pieper, was that Walther depended too heavily on the secondary sources of theology, i.e., Luther and the lesser fathers. In spite of all his emphasis on Scripture, there can be no denying this. Although Walther was a great and a very talented leader, he was a poor, even an inferior exegete. He had only an average knowledge of the original biblical languages. Frequently he would cite dozens of Bible passages merely because Luther and the dogmaticians had done so. Yet these passages did not prove what they were supposed to prove. Although very eager to express himself on matters, he failed to recognize that his position was based on translations and not on the original text. Thus, he could say something as if it were doctrinally true, but without a firm scriptural basis. Overall, the knowledge of Scripture that Walther had was more an intimate acquaintance with Luther’s Bible and knowledge of certain passages rather than knowledge of the whole line of thought of a biblical book and of the original text.
Note: The conclusion is that he was a fantastic quoter but a poor and weak exegete who could not read the original Biblical text. As we can read, seems like he had an opinion about any spiritual matter, "eager to express himself on matters". There are plenty of these cultic types of people who can even quote Scripture from memory but when analyzed deeper, it is off.


Classic Lutheran Books Adding Members Hourly

 We'll have this computer purring in no time.

People are joining Classic Lutheran Books - all day long. Many are adding their friends and posting tips on how to obtain traditional Lutheran books.

We are featuring Alec Satin's
Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry

Consider this, fair and noble readers. That  Lutheran Library website alone has a large collection of the books I would recommend to anyone, plus many more bonus volumes. All of them are free and easy to store on any digital device.




I am getting all my books into Dropbox for free - public domain - sharing by everyone. If someone wants Luther's Sermons and the Gems, I can send that link (and so can you) to anyone. No charge. No fees. Free sharing. Unlimited and unconditional use.

The page of free book links on Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed, is here. I am adding to it, as time becomes available.

As you might notice, I link often because that feeds the search engines when anyone clicks on the links. So much can be done for free.