Friday, February 19, 2021

Before and After Rush Limbaugh


My home town was conservative - or at least Republican. All the schools were named after Republicans, except for Wilson Junior High, the newest of the three. One junior high was John Deere, and the other was Calvin Coolidge. When the class of 1966 graduated, we scattered all over for college. Our generation was the first to be lobotomized by Left-wing propaganda, and the effect was permanent, as I can see on many Facebook discussions.

Deep into the last century I was struck by the way the word "conservative" was used and often avoided. Without evidence, anything bad was conservative or Right wing. Everything good was liberal and nothing was Left-wing. The English language death squads were already patrolling American speech patterns and telling people which words to use and avoid. 

Rush Limbaugh established a beachhead in the midst of America's death-by-a-thousand-cuts socialism. He spoke in favor of common sense, conservatism, and the US Constitution. He favored individual accomplishment rather than socialistic solutions.

Oddly enough, Jay Webber, OJ Stormtrooper - whose first call was in Cape Girardeau, Missouri (Limbaugh's home town) - introduced me to the Limbaugh show. From that point I enjoyed many people telling me they found this new radio show, had I ever heard of it? They were overwhelmed by the different style and humor of the Rush Limbaugh show.

Growing up in Moline was a history lesson, because my mother and father were at least 10 years older than my friends' parents. My parents became adults during the Great Depression, when work was dear and wages were in pennies. Dad said, "I was a pin-setter at the bowling alley for 2 cents a game, later raised 3 cents." During WWII, he legally piled up bakery supplies but he also shared them with his competitors. My mother taught in one-room country schools and opposed the consolidation of school districts and the loss of those rural schools. She seldom liked what the system imposed on her for textbooks but knew she could not complain too much.

Rush Limbaugh, about the same age as I am, echoed the training of his parents, and questioned the improvements being foisted upon America in the name of a better society for all. He did such a good job in the midst of opposition and slander that the word conservative began to have some luster - and meaning - again. The Left fought back. After Reagan's terms were up, the two political parties served up 28 years of American-Socialist-Party, or ASP. The presidential candidate's party did not matter, because each opposition pair represented the same ideology of war, higher taxes, and *gubmint meddling -

  • GHW Bush versus Carter
  • GHW Bush versus Clinton
  • Clinton versus Dole
  • George W. Bush versus Gore
  • George W. Bush versus Kerry
  • Obama versus McCain
  • Obama versus Romney

Suddenly in 2015 - for most of us - a candidate appeared without a terminal case of MeTooism. FDR made fun of Republicans who parroted his ideas with "Me Too!" Candidate Trump spoke directly to the people, as Reagan did, and overwhelmed all opposition. 

Even with Trump's long history of success in the midst of opposition - often obscured by his bouts of self-praise - The Donald would be the first to concede that Limbaugh opened up and secured a place for Constitutional conservatives to occupy.

I remain confident that America will renew itself with the help of a much larger group of Constitutional Conservatives, no matter what their label may be. Whatever has been set in motion will complete the work that needs to be done. Long ago, Aristotle write, "Patience and courage are so close to each other than one is either the mother or the sister of the other." For an old guy, barely remembered, Aristotle was pretty smart - and still is.

Here is one more Greek.




"Give me a lever and I can move the world." Archimedes.
That lever is the Word of God.

* Reagan always said gubmint with intent, since he had perfection diction.

+++

From Rush Limbaugh's Father




RUSH INTRODUCTION: My father, Rush H. Limbaugh, Jr., delivered this oft-requested address locally a number of times, but it had never before appeared in print until it was published in The Limbaugh Letter. My dad was renowned for his oratory skills and for his original mind; this speech is, I think, a superb demonstration of both. I will always be grateful to him for instilling in me a passion for the ideas and lives of America's Founders, as well as a deep appreciation for the inspirational power of words, which you will see evidenced here:

"Our Lives, Our Fortunes, Our Sacred Honor"

It was a glorious morning. The sun was shining and the wind was from the Southeast. Up especially early, a tall bony, redheaded young Virginian found time to buy a new thermometer, for which he paid three pounds, fifteen shillings. He also bought gloves for Martha, his wife, who was ill at home.

Thomas Jefferson arrived early at the statehouse. The temperature was 72.5 degrees and the horseflies weren't nearly so bad at that hour. It was a lovely room, very large, with gleaming white walls. The chairs were comfortable. Facing the single door were two brass fireplaces, but they would not be used today.

The moment the door was shut, and it was always kept locked, the room became an oven. The tall windows were shut, so that loud quarreling voices could not be heard by passersby. Small openings atop the windows allowed a slight stir of air, and also a large number of horseflies. Jefferson records that "the horseflies were dexterous in finding necks, and the silk of stockings was nothing to them." All discussing was punctuated by the slap of hands on necks.

On the wall at the back, facing the president's desk, was a panoply -- consisting of a drum, swords, and banners seized from Fort Ticonderoga the previous year. Ethan Allen and Benedict Arnold had captured the place, shouting that they were taking it "in the name of the Great Jehovah and the Continental Congress!"

Now Congress got to work, promptly taking up an emergency measure about which there was discussion but no dissension. "Resolved: That an application be made to the Committee of Safety of Pennsylvania for a supply of flints for the troops at New York."

Then Congress transformed itself into a committee of the whole. The Declaration of Independence was read aloud once more, and debate resumed. Though Jefferson was the best writer of all of them, he had been somewhat verbose. Congress hacked the excess away. They did a good job, as a side-by-side comparison of the rough draft and the final text shows. They cut the phrase "by a self-assumed power." "Climb" was replaced by "must read," then "must" was eliminated, then the whole sentence, and soon the whole paragraph was cut. Jefferson groaned as they continued what he later called "their depredations." "Inherent and inalienable rights" came out "certain unalienable rights," and to this day no one knows who suggested the elegant change.

A total of 86 alterations were made. Almost 500 words were eliminated, leaving 1,337. At last, after three days of wrangling, the document was put to a vote.

Here in this hall Patrick Henry had once thundered: "I am no longer a Virginian, sir, but an American." But today the loud, sometimes bitter argument stilled, and without fanfare the vote was taken from north to south by colonies, as was the custom. On July 4, 1776, the Declaration of Independence was adopted.

There were no trumpets blown. No one stood on his chair and cheered. The afternoon was waning and Congress had no thought of delaying the full calendar of routine business on its hands. For several hours they worked on many other problems before adjourning for the day.

Much To Lose

What kind of men were the 56 signers who adopted the Declaration of Independence and who, by their signing, committed an act of treason against the crown? To each of you, the names Franklin, Adams, Hancock and Jefferson are almost as familiar as household words. Most of us, however, know nothing of the other signers. Who were they? What happened to them?

I imagine that many of you are somewhat surprised at the names not there: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Patrick Henry. All were elsewhere.

Ben Franklin was the only really old man. Eighteen were under 40; three were in their 20s. Of the 56 almost half - 24 - were judges and lawyers. Eleven were merchants, nine were landowners and farmers, and the remaining 12 were doctors, ministers, and politicians.

With only a few exceptions, such as Samuel Adams of Massachusetts, these were men of substantial property. All but two had families. The vast majority were men of education and standing in their communities. They had economic security as few men had in the 18th Century.

Each had more to lose from revolution than he had to gain by it. John Hancock, one of the richest men in America, already had a price of 500 pounds on his head. He signed in enormous letters so that his Majesty could now read his name without glasses and could now double the reward. Ben Franklin wryly noted: "Indeed we must all hang together, otherwise we shall most assuredly hang separately."

Fat Benjamin Harrison of Virginia told tiny Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts: "With me it will all be over in a minute, but you, you will be dancing on air an hour after I am gone."

These men knew what they risked. The penalty for treason was death by hanging. And remember, a great British fleet was already at anchor in New York Harbor.

They were sober men. There were no dreamy-eyed intellectuals or draft card burners here. They were far from hot-eyed fanatics yammering for an explosion. They simply asked for the status quo. It was change they resisted. It was equality with the mother country they desired. It was taxation with representation they sought. They were all conservatives, yet they rebelled.

It was principle, not property, that had brought these men to Philadelphia. Two of them became presidents of the United States. Seven of them became state governors. One died in office as vice president of the United States. Several would go on to be US Senators. One, the richest man in America, in 1828 founded the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. One, a delegate from Philadelphia, was the only real poet, musician and philosopher of the signers. (It was he, Francis Hopkinson not Betsy Ross who designed the United States flag.)

Richard Henry Lee, a delegate from Virginia, had introduced the resolution to adopt the Declaration of Independence in June of 1776. He was prophetic in his concluding remarks: "Why then sir, why do we longer delay? Why still deliberate? Let this happy day give birth to an American Republic. Let her arise not to devastate and to conquer but to reestablish the reign of peace and law.

"The eyes of Europe are fixed upon us. She demands of us a living example of freedom that may exhibit a contrast in the felicity of the citizen to the ever-increasing tyranny which desolates her polluted shores. She invites us to prepare an asylum where the unhappy may find solace, and the persecuted repost.

"If we are not this day wanting in our duty, the names of the American Legislatures of 1776 will be placed by posterity at the side of all of those whose memory has been and ever will be dear to virtuous men and good citizens."

Though the resolution was formally adopted July 4, it was not until July 8 that two of the states authorized their delegates to sign, and it was not until August 2 that the signers met at Philadelphia to actually put their names to the Declaration.

William Ellery, delegate from Rhode Island, was curious to see the signers' faces as they committed this supreme act of personal courage. He saw some men sign quickly, "but in no face was he able to discern real fear." Stephan Hopkins, Ellery's colleague from Rhode Island, was a man past 60. As he signed with a shaking pen, he declared: "My hand trembles, but my heart does not."


"Most Glorious Service"

Even before the list was published, the British marked down every member of Congress suspected of having put his name to treason. All of them became the objects of vicious manhunts. Some were taken. Some, like Jefferson, had narrow escapes. All who had property or families near British strongholds suffered.

  • Francis Lewis, New York delegate saw his home plundered -- and his estates in what is now Harlem -- completely destroyed by British Soldiers. Mrs. Lewis was captured and treated with great brutality. Though she was later exchanged for two British prisoners through the efforts of Congress, she died from the effects of her abuse.
  • William Floyd, another New York delegate, was able to escape with his wife and children across Long Island Sound to Connecticut, where they lived as refugees without income for seven years. When they came home they found a devastated ruin.
  • Philips Livingstone had all his great holdings in New York confiscated and his family driven out of their home. Livingstone died in 1778 still working in Congress for the cause.
  • Louis Morris, the fourth New York delegate, saw all his timber, crops, and livestock taken. For seven years he was barred from his home and family.
  • John Hart of Trenton, New Jersey, risked his life to return home to see his dying wife. Hessian soldiers rode after him, and he escaped in the woods. While his wife lay on her deathbed, the soldiers ruined his farm and wrecked his homestead. Hart, 65, slept in caves and woods as he was hunted across the countryside. When at long last, emaciated by hardship, he was able to sneak home, he found his wife had already been buried, and his 13 children taken away. He never saw them again. He died a broken man in 1779, without ever finding his family.
  • Dr. John Witherspoon, signer, was president of the College of New Jersey, later called Princeton. The British occupied the town of Princeton, and billeted troops in the college. They trampled and burned the finest college library in the country.
  • Judge Richard Stockton, another New Jersey delegate signer, had rushed back to his estate in an effort to evacuate his wife and children. The family found refuge with friends, but a Tory sympathizer betrayed them. Judge Stockton was pulled from bed in the night and brutally beaten by the arresting soldiers. Thrown into a common jail, he was deliberately starved. Congress finally arranged for Stockton's parole, but his health was ruined. The judge was released as an invalid, when he could no longer harm the British cause.He returned home to find his estate looted and did not live to see the triumph of the Revolution. His family was forced to live off charity.
  • Robert Morris, merchant prince of Philadelphia, delegate and signer, met Washington's appeals and pleas for money year after year. He made and raised arms and provisions which made it possible for Washington to cross the Delaware at Trenton. In the process he lost 150 ships at sea, bleeding his own fortune and credit almost dry.
  • George Clymer, Pennsylvania signer, escaped with his family from their home, but their property was completely destroyed by the British in the Germantown and Brandywine campaigns.
  • Dr. Benjamin Rush, also from Pennsylvania, was forced to flee to Maryland. As a heroic surgeon with the army, Rush had several narrow escapes.
  • John Martin, a Tory in his views previous to the debate, lived in a strongly loyalist area of Pennsylvania. When he came out for independence, most of his neighbors and even some of his relatives ostracized him. He was a sensitive and troubled man, and many believed this action killed him. When he died in 1777, his last words to his tormentors were: "Tell them that they will live to see the hour when they shall acknowledge it [the signing] to have been the most glorious service that I have ever rendered to my country."
  • William Ellery, Rhode Island delegate, saw his property and home burned to the ground.
  • Thomas Lynch, Jr., South Carolina delegate, had his health broken from privation and exposures while serving as a company commander in the military. His doctors ordered him to seek a cure in the West Indies and on the voyage, he and his young bride were drowned at sea.
  • Edward Rutledge, Arthur Middleton, and Thomas Heyward, Jr., the other three South Carolina signers, were taken by the British in the siege of Charleston. They were carried as prisoners of war to St. Augustine, Florida, where they were singled out for indignities. They were exchanged at the end of the war, the British in the meantime having completely devastated their large landholdings and estates.
  • Thomas Nelson, signer of Virginia, was at the front in command of the Virginia military forces. With British General Charles Cornwallis in Yorktown, fire from 70 heavy American guns began to destroy Yorktown piece by piece. Lord Cornwallis and his staff moved their headquarters into Nelson's palatial home. While American cannonballs were making a shambles of the town, the house of Governor Nelson remained untouched. Nelson turned in rage to the American gunners and asked, "Why do you spare my home?"They replied, "Sir, out of respect to you." Nelson cried, "Give me the cannon!" and fired on his magnificent home himself, smashing it to bits. But Nelson's sacrifice was not quite over. He had raised $2 million for the Revolutionary cause by pledging his own estates. When the loans came due, a newer peacetime Congress refused to honor them, and Nelson's property was forfeited. He was never reimbursed. He died, impoverished, a few years later at the age of 50.

Lives, Fortunes, Honor

Of those 56 who signed the Declaration of Independence, nine died of wounds or hardships during the war. Five were captured and imprisoned, in each case with brutal treatment. Several lost wives, sons or entire families. One lost his 13 children. Two wives were brutally treated. All were at one time or another the victims of manhunts and driven from their homes. Twelve signers had their homes completely burned. Seventeen lost everything they owned. Yet not one defected or went back on his pledged word. Their honor, and the nation they sacrificed so much to create is still intact.

And, finally, there is the New Jersey signer, Abraham Clark.

He gave two sons to the officer corps in the Revolutionary Army. They were captured and sent to that infamous British prison hulk afloat in New York Harbor known as the hell ship Jersey, where 11,000 American captives were to die. The younger Clarks were treated with a special brutality because of their father. One was put in solitary and given no food. With the end almost in sight, with the war almost won, no one could have blamed Abraham Clark for acceding to the British request when they offered him his sons' lives if he would recant and come out for the King and Parliament. The utter despair in this man's heart, the anguish in his very soul, must reach out to each one of us down through 200 years with his answer: "No."

The 56 signers of the Declaration Of Independence proved by their every deed that they made no idle boast when they composed the most magnificent curtain line in history. "And for the support of this Declaration with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor."


RUSH EPILOGUE: My friends, I know you have a copy of the Declaration of Independence somewhere around the house - in an old history book (newer ones may well omit it), an encyclopedia, or one of those artificially aged "parchments" we all got in school years ago. I suggest that each of you take the time this month to read through the text of the Declaration, one of the most noble and beautiful political documents in human history.

There is no more profound sentence than this: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness..."

These are far more than mere poetic words. The underlying ideas that infuse every sentence of this treatise have sustained this nation for more than two centuries. They were forged in the crucible of great sacrifice. They are living words that spring from and satisfy the deepest cries for liberty in the human spirit.

"Sacred honor" isn't a phrase we use much these days, but every American life is touched by the bounty of this, the Founders' legacy. It is freedom, tested by blood, and watered with tears.



Thursday, February 18, 2021

From a Former WELS Student - Martin Luther College - Animal House.
WELS Discussions, Facebook

 


WELS Discussions - Facebook

So, with all the people exposing LPS, and others. It’s time to talk college. First on the list is MLC.

While most people have a great time at MLC, both times I went I did not. I did however meet wonderful people on that campus who will remain forever friends, and teachers that I appreciate and admire.

•First, let’s talk about an experience that happened to a friend of mine. My friend has struggled with mental health issues such as depression and anxiety for a really long time. When brought to the attention of a person in authority, they literally told them, that “that’s not very Christian like of you.” My friend eventually left that campus after a short time. 

•Someone else I know had their roommate be intimate with their partner in the room that they shared. After bringing it up with multiple RAs and staff members, nothing happened.

•The boys dormitory (specifically concord hall) is actually atrocious. Men walk around hallways naked during open dorms, obscene music is heard blasted down the corridors, and not to mention it smells awful. When a friend of mine talked to the tutor in the hall they said “oh, they’ll grow up.” -BUT THEY’RE ADULTS.

•Another friend of mine left within their first month at MLC. MLC practically forced them to leave because they thought that they were “unfit for ministry” because they have a disability. Because they didn’t fit the cookie cutter image that MLC wants to portray. Not to mention they were constantly the target of bullying from other students.

•Teachers hazed the same friend from the first story because they weren’t getting good enough grades even though they were going to tutors and I was helping them with homework and studying so much that they decided to quit church and ministry all together.

•A teacher of mine made us make memes about the Bible. My friends and I got kicked out of his class for not complying to do the assignment. (Because the Bible is ya know, sacred) that’s what YOUR hard earned money is getting donated to. And yes, we pay $27,000 a year to do stupid stuff like making memes in BHL instead of actually learning.

•MLC’s building a brand new sports facility and some fancy new dorms to “compete with other colleges.” Even though we have a perfectly good sports facility right down the hill from campus. Plus, people aren’t going to MLC because they want to have an actual college experience, but because they want to serve their Savior.

 •MLC students frequently get MINORS from LPS,MLS, etc. DRUNK on their junior focus trip. It’s not just a sin- it’s against the law. The campus is aware but nothing has happened of course. 

•MLC throws ravers and parties and minors get wasted pretty much every weekend.

•Weed is common on campus.- it’s still illegal in MN.

•People at MLC are two-faced as much as they are at LPS. 

•If you’re “WELS- royalty” getting caught with/doing anything bad pretty much means you’re getting away with it. 

• hazing isn’t as bad as I remember, but I mean... that wasn’t my experience.

• someone junior year got a letter sent to their home from MLC telling them they they were not “fit for ministry” even though they had average grades.

•MLC only cares about the paycheck.

My experience at MLC:

Becides the fact they hurt my friends, my experience overall was average. As someone who went to LPS, I was well aware of what I was getting into.

The second time was much worse than the first.

Have fun transferring to MLC from other colleges. 

Barely any credits transfer if you end up lucky. You’ll have to repeat grades even though you have enough college credits to be a junior. I understand taking religion classes, but I was in classes that were general education classes, with people 3+ years younger than I was. I was re-learning information. I also was newly married and live 50 minutes away. I understand having a policy for on campus students about tardiness/missing classes. But when I was working 60 hour weeks at my minimum wage job to keep us living, I think there should be more understanding. 

A teacher told me “school is your first priority.” And  after missing like 2 classes, you fail.  After we went entirely online, my depression and exhaustion from working so much got so bad that I just gave up entirely, and ended up dropping out. Currently I have decided I will not return. I know that others have good experiences but I did not. 

Plus, for being a Christian institution people don’t act like Christians.

Our Weather - Strange


Our second snow came yesterday, on top of mushy then frozen snow from the days before. The side roads are unplowed. Intersections are treacherous. Ranger Bob took me to the store to get a few items - four-wheel drive Chevy Silverado. The one-mile trip was uneventful. 

He was angry we had no cashiers. One worker said, "One hundred people called in today. We don't have enough people." Bob apologized - he hates the robot check-outs.

The bread aisle was empty rather than packed with bread. The aisle is so long it fades into the distance. I have seen categories disappear for storms and other reasons. I never saw the bread disappear like cleaning products.

At home I opened up the Ft. Knox of bird food - 20 pounds of sunflower seeds. Like us, the birds learn gratitude from shortages. I put a pyramid of seeds on each barrel and rang the chimes. All day long the birds and squirrels came in groups, retiring to the next group eat.

Three crows landed and ate a short time. Spotting me at the window made them go to a new location.

Male and female cardinals ate patiently. They have the strongest beaks for opening seeds, so they seem to smirk while going through the quota.

Blue jays are quick to fly in and leave with some food.

Starlings come in a large group and take over the barrel - until one of them spots me and leads everyone up to the branches again. They loiter between serving times, ready to occupy and devour. 

Juncos or snowbirds quietly peck through the snow and seeds, either on the barrel or the ground.

Chickadees grab their seed, one at a time, and fly to a safe branch so they can hold the seed with their feet and hammer the seed open with their beaks.

A downy woodpecker stopped for food. His red beany made him especially prominent. I also heard woodpecker noise as one hammered on a tree. 

Wednesday, February 17, 2021

Ash Wednesday, 2021. Luther's Galatians



Ash Wednesday Service Video - Chapter 1 of Luther's Galatians.
The photo is from Sexagesima Sunday.




Ash Wednesday, 2021, 7 PM Central

 

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

 

https://video.ibm.com/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

 

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 7 PM CentralTime

 

The Hymn #552           Abide with Me 

            

The Order of Vespers                                                p. 41

The Psalmody               Psalm 1                              p. 123

The Lections                 Joel 2:12-19

Matthew 6:16-2

 

The Sermon Hymn #578   Lord, While For All Mankind We Pray        

 

The Sermon –   Galatians 1

The Prayers

The Lord’s Prayer

The Collect for Grace                                       p. 45

 

The Hymn #654        Now the Day Is Over          


Today the death of Rush Limbaugh was announced. 

He believed in Christ as his Savior and brought America back to Constitutional principles, not completely, but as much as one man could. 

 

 

KJV Joel 2:12 Therefore also now, saith the LORD, turn ye even to me with all your heart, and with fasting, and with weeping, and with mourning: 13 And rend your heart, and not your garments, and turn unto the LORD your God: for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repenteth him of the evil. 14 Who knoweth if he will return and repent, and leave a blessing behind him; even a meat offering and a drink offering unto the LORD your God? 15 Blow the trumpet in Zion, sanctify a fast, call a solemn assembly: 16 Gather the people, sanctify the congregation, assemble the elders, gather the children, and those that suck the breasts: let the bridegroom go forth of his chamber, and the bride out of her closet. 17 Let the priests, the ministers of the LORD, weep between the porch and the altar, and let them say, Spare thy people, O LORD, and give not thine heritage to reproach, that the heathen should rule over them: wherefore should they say among the people, Where is their God? 18 Then will the LORD be jealous for his land, and pity his people. 19 Yea, the LORD will answer and say unto his people, Behold, I will send you corn, and wine, and oil, and ye shall be satisfied therewith: and I will no more make you a reproach among the heathen:

 


 

 

KJV Matthew 6:16 Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. 17 But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face; 18 That thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly. 19 Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: 20 But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: 21 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

 

Galatians 1

 

We have two commentaries on Galatians by Luther, the shorter one used here and the longer one, which is even better – but much longer. We debated using the longer one but decided 100% of the short is one better than 1% of the longer one.

The editors of the Formula of Concord, in Article III, The Righteousness of Faith, commended the Galatians Commentary to anyone who wished to know more about Justification by Faith.

 

FC, III, #67 Concerning what is needful furthermore for the proper explanation of this profound and chief article of justification before God, upon which depends the salvation of our souls, we direct, and for the sake of brevity herewith refer, every one to Dr. Luther’s beautiful and glorious exposition of the Epistle of St. Paul to the Galatians.

 

Lest anyone wonder about the Chief Article’s actual definition – here it is –

 

FC, III, #6. This article concerning justification by faith (as the Apology says) is the chief article in the entire Christian doctrine, without which no poor conscience can have any firm consolation, or can truly know the riches of the grace of Christ, as Dr. Luther also has written: If this only article remains pure on the battlefield, the Christian Church also remains pure, and in goodly harmony and without any sects; but if it does not remain pure, it is not possible that any error or fanatical spirit can be resisted.

 

This FC passage unites Melanchthon (Augsburg Confession and Apology), Luther (all his works), and Chemnitz (senior editor of the Book of Concord) in the same confession, contrary to the fakes at the Emmaus Conference, Webber and Buchholz, plus Zarling and Bivens. Early, LCMS and WELS taught Justification by Faith. Little Andrea has a Gausewitz. Missouri officially recognized Justification by Faith though the Stephan-Walther-Pieper faction gradually took over with OJ.

 

1 Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;) 2 And all the brethren which are with me, unto the churches of Galatia: 3 Grace be to you and peace from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ, 4 Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the will of God and our Father: 5 To whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

 

Luther in blue:

The world bears the Gospel a grudge because the Gospel condemns the religious wisdom of the world. Jealous for its own religious views, the world in turn charges the Gospel with being a subversive and licentious doctrine, offensive to God and man, a doctrine to be persecuted as the worst plague on earth.

As a result, we have this paradoxical situation: The Gospel supplies the world with the salvation of Jesus Christ, peace of conscience, and every blessing. Just for that the world abhors the Gospel.

These Jewish-Christian fanatics who pushed themselves into the Galatian churches after Paul’s departure, boasted that they were the descendants of Abraham, true ministers of Christ, having been trained by the apostles themselves, that they were able to perform miracles.

In every way they sought to undermine the authority of St. Paul. They said to the Galatians: “You have no right to think highly of Paul. He was the last to turn to Christ. But we have seen Christ. We heard Him preach. Paul came later and is beneath us. It is possible for us to be in error—we who have received the Holy Ghost? Paul stands alone. He has not seen Christ, nor has he had much contact with the other apostles. Indeed, he persecuted the Church of Christ for a long time.”

 

Galatians 1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

Luther

How patiently Paul deals with his seduced Galatians! He does not pounce on them but, like a father, he fairly excuses their error. With motherly affection he talks to them yet he does it in a way that at the same time he also reproves them. On the other hand, he is highly indignant at the seducers whom he blames for the apostasy of the Galatians. His anger bursts forth in elemental fury at the beginning of his epistle. “If any may,” he cries, “preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.” Later on, in the fifth chapter, he threatens the false apostles with damnation. “He that troubleth you shall bear his judgment, whosoever he be.” He pronounces a curse upon them. “I would they were even cut off which trouble you.”

He might have addressed the Galatians after this fashion: “I am ashamed of you. Your ingratitude grieves me. I am angry with you.” But his purpose was to call them back to the Gospel. With this purpose in his mind he speaks very gently to them. He could not have chosen a milder expression than this, “I marvel.” It indicates his sorrow and his displeasure.

Paul minds the rule which he himself lays down in a later chapter where he says: “Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.” Toward those who have been misled we are to show ourselves parentally affectionate, so that they may perceive that we seek not their destruction but their salvation. Over against the devil and his missionaries, the authors of false doctrines and sects, we ought to be like the Apostle, impatient, and rigorously condemnatory, as parents are with the dog that bites their little one, but the weeping child itself they soothe. with their power over the ministry.

10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ. 11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. 12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ. 13 For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews' religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it: 14 And profited in the Jews' religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.

Luther:

This passage constitutes Paul’s chief defense against the accusations of his opponents. He maintains under oath that he received his Gospel not from men, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.

In declaring that his Gospel is not after man, Paul does not merely wish to state that his Gospel is not mundane. The false apostles made the same claim for their gospel. Paul means to say that he learned his Gospel not in the usual and accepted manner through the agency of men by hearing, reading, or writing. He received the Gospel by special revelation directly from Jesus Christ.

Paul received his Gospel on the way to Damascus when Christ appeared to him. St. Luke furnishes an account of the incident in the ninth chapter of the Book of Acts. “Arise,” said Christ to Paul, “and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do.” Christ did not send Paul into the city to learn the Gospel from Ananias. Ananias was only to baptize Paul, to lay his hands-on Paul, to commit the ministry of the Word unto Paul, and to recommend him to the Church. Ananias recognized his limited assignment when he said to Paul: “Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost.” Paul did not receive instruction from Ananias. Paul had already been called, enlightened, and taught by Christ in the road. His contact with Ananias was merely a testimonial to the fact that Paul had been called by Christ to preach the Gospel.


 

15 But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called me by his grace, 16 To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood: 17 Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus. 18 Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days. 19 But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother.20 Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not. 21 Afterwards I came into the regions of Syria and Cilicia; 22 And was unknown by face unto the churches of Judaea which were in Christ: 23 But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed. 24 And they glorified God in me.

Luther:

“I went to Arabia before I saw any of the apostles. I took it upon myself to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles without delay, because Christ had called me for that purpose.” This statement refutes the assertion of the false apostles that Paul had been a pupil of the apostles, from which the false apostles inferred that Paul had been instructed in the obedience of the Law, that therefore the Gentiles also ought to keep the Law and submit to circumcision.

18, 19. Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days. But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord’s brother.

Paul minutely recounts his personal history to stop the cavil of the false apostles. Paul does not deny that he had been with some of the apostles. He went to Jerusalem uninvited, not to be instructed, but to visit with Peter. Luke reports the occasion in the ninth chapter of the Book of Acts. Barnabas introduced Paul to the apostles and related to them how Paul had met the Lord Jesus on the way to Damascus, also how Paul had preached boldly at Damascus in the name of Jesus. Paul says that he saw Peter and James, but he denies that he learned anything from them.

Why does Paul harp on this seemingly unimportant fact? To convince the churches of Galatia that his Gospel was the true Word of Christ which he learned from Christ Himself and from no man. Paul was forced to affirm and re-affirm this fact. His usefulness to all the churches that had used him as their pastor and teacher was at stake.

20.         Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not.

Was it necessary for Paul to go under oath? Yes. Paul is reporting personal history. How else would the churches believe him? The false apostles might say, “Who knows whether Paul is telling the truth?” Paul, the elect vessel of God, was held in so little esteem by his own Galatians to whom he had preached Christ that it was necessary for him to swear an oath that he spoke the truth. If this happened to Paul, what business have we to complain when people doubt our words, or hold us in little regard, we who cannot begin to compare ourselves with the Apostle?

 

 




Free PDF - Understanding Luther's Galatians

This is the download link to the free PDF.
The print copy is on on Amazon.





Rest in Peace - Rush Limbaugh Has Died

We just heard on TV - Rush Limbaugh has died.




Cub Editor of Calvinist News on What He Does Not Know about Communion

 Christian News continues to be a mixture of Calvinism (right) and rationalistic Pietism (Profesor Knapp, Halle University)




If people want to use distance Holy Communion and pastors want to provide it, why does Hale get his Geneva gown in a knot about it?

Hale also says that Justification by Faith is "just a phrase." True it is a phrase used many times in the New Testament and expressed from Genesis 15:6 on - in the Old Testament. But all his blabbering in the language of Halle University and Calvin's Geneva is nothing more than the feeble protests of a bishop wannabee.

He should read this book, published by Christian News:

Maier earned a PhD in Semitics and invented radio evangelism. Did he imagine that his talks about the inerrant Word of God were ineffective over the airwaves? Poor Hale knows nothing about the efficacy of the Word and the Means of Grace, phrases seldom found in Calvinism and Pietism.


I am guessing that the vast majority of Lutheran congregations have not provided for broadcasting their worship services, with or without Holy Communion. Did their synods and pastors do them a favor, caught flat-footed in the Covid shutdowns? Many chose not to have services at all, after all these months.

Hale's argument is as retrograde as it could be, suggesting that anything other than the Word within the nave is forbidden! No Hammond organ. No microphones. No screens (a idea, actually). 

Would Hale rage against those pastors who hold no services? That would step on too many tender Ft. Wayne toes.