Walther and the Predestination Controversy: The Error of Modern Missouri - From the Lutheran Librarian |
Sidebar - Reviews move books. One novel was trashed so badly by so many critics that the author never tried to publish again. The book? Moby Dick. It was re-discovered much later and became required reading and named the greatest novel produced in America.
Reviews are tied into social media, so the number of reviews matter. As you know, I link all the time and link the links, then the sources of links, and finally the leading links serving as yet another link.
Consider this - all the Lutheran Librarian efforts are non-profit, just like mine. In fact, all the media ministries from our little group are non-profit. Therefore, what you review on Amazon will be noticed more. The rules are listed in the graphic below. I will copy my remarks here into the Amazon page for this book, Walther and the Predestination Controversy: The Error of Modern Missouri.
Every time a faithful book is reviewed, a demon gets his pitchfork sharpened for the Fulleroids he is hosting. |
Amazon Review - Walther and the Predestination Controversy: The Error of Modern Missouri -
From the Lutheran Librarian
The Predestination Error Set Up the Missouri Synod for Failure
This work of scholarship provides the background needed for the travails of Missouri Synod and kindred sects in the 20th century and beyond. Unfortunately for everyone, Walther reached the point where his opinions became "settled doctrine" the moment they were published.
As John Brenner, WELS, has agreed in his dissertation, Walther used election without faith to support his dogma, borrowed from the Halle Pietists, that the world is forgiven without faith. The first argument, against Justification by Faith, did not receive much support. However, the second argument, against election, allowed more space for Objective Justification to grow.
This book is a marvel of literature and sources against Walther's dream of doctrinal hegemony. One can pick it up and read any section to gain new insights into the controversy.