 |
| "You could have gone to Notre Dame, and larned something. Why are so many "confessional, conservative" Lutherans studying with the Jesuits? Most Catholics loathe the Jesuits." |
The Karl Fabrezius, PhD, Society of Jesus, doctrinal breakthrough is linked here.
His inspired (by whom?) statement is here.
During the Gottesdienst conference last week I was once again reminded that without good systematic doctrine exegesis will certainly go astray. Sometimes we take things for granted and the obvious gets passed over. As one of my fellow editors said, exegesis is more fun. However, if there is not a sober doctrinal framework, one might become drunk as he imbibes of the Scriptures and stumble around in all kind (sic) of dangerous territories. After all, every attractive heresy and false teaching is proclaimed to be Scriptural.
In spite of the careless words, which were probably applauded more loudly than the latest Schwan Foundation grant, Fabrezius has explained ELCA-LCMS-WELS-CLC- ELS-ELDONA perfectly.
He omitted one basic principle behind his summary - the organization is the final word on all doctrine - whether it is from one Lutheran sect or another. They are no different from the Church of Rome.
That is the deadly toxic from which Codex Fabreziensis emerges, to wit -
"Without good systematic doctrine, exegesis will certainly go astray."
To narrow it down a bit, that is why ELS-WELS-LCMS appeal to their seminaries (!) and what the pastors were taught (?!). DNA matters too.
That is how Lutheran pastors have converted to Barthian hogwash ever since Karl began promoting his regurgitated Marxist propaganda in the form of Charlotte Kirschbaum's dogmatics.
Justification without Faith (Objective Justification) can easily be refuted from the Scriptures, but no - OJ is true because the synod and "my favorite teacher" says otherwise. The dreadful NIV mockery of Romans 3 can be thwarted by their own new improved NIV. As my college students said, "Justification by Faith is still there in the NIV."
The Jesuit Fabrezius and his co-conspirators realize that they control the Scriptures by making their seminaries the last word on what the Bible teaches. Can anyone imagine the Brobdingnagian Gospel of Mark (CPH) commentary being the ruling norm? I can, because the grammarian Voelz considers Codex Vaticanus the original version of Mark, a laughable Jesuit assumption so convenient for causing confusion, doubt, and apostasy.
When lying, smirking DP Buchholz kicked Rydecki out of WELS, he wrote, "I am saddened that you no longer believe what you were taught in seminary." Buchholz left out the physical, emotional, and sexual abuse common to GA hazing rites. Who can forget those events?
Does anyone wonder why the King James Version is mocked, rejected, and ignored by the present generation of Lutheran pastors and professors? Unlike the NIV, ESV, RSV, NRSV, and even the New KJV, the Authorized Version does not change its wording every few years - and, note this - does not refer the reader to fraudulent text readings in the footnotes.
Do the Little Three (NIV, ESV, RSV) use footnotes as alternates to the KJV? Ponder that.
 |
| Fortunately, there is only one copy of Bark's Church Dogmatics. |
