Friday, February 5, 2021

More of The Bible Book Christian Faith and the Greek Text Problem

 

 Lenski was replaced by a liberal at Cap Seminary.


III.  Christian Faith and the Greek Text Problem

           

The sole purpose of the Bible is to teach faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Word Incarnate. Long ago, Yale University taught the Scriptural revelation of the Virgin Birth of Christ and His Resurrection. However, rationalism grew in Europe in the 19th century, and American academics trained in Germany brought back these ideas as  the new intellectual leaders of their denominations. A good example is Walter Rauschenbusch, whose epic 1917 Social Gospel lectures at Yale re-interpreted the ministry and message of Jesus. They changed the eternal Gospel into political and social activism. Every miracle had a rationalistic explanation, and Jesus was divine only in the way God shown through His transparency.

Two Biblical Views

            There are only two basic views of the Bible. One holds that the Spirit reveals God’s will, from the Creation to the end of time. The Scriptures are infallible and inerrant, the inerrancy term used recently because infallible was re-interpreted to mean “fallible in Biblical history and geography,” thanks to the influence of rationalism. This divide became more apparent as people were promoted or shunned for their views on the Bible. R. C. H. Lenski was silenced, shunned, and replaced as the New Testament Professor at the Capital University Seminary, for teaching inerrancy and insisting on it in the 1930 merger. Although Lenski remains one of the most respected New Testament scholars in print, he was followed by a professor who taught the opposite to the seminarians. Thus, inerrancy was retired with Professor Lenski although the ALC/TALC retained an image of conservatism until it merged with the AELC and LCA in 1987 to form ELCA (Every Left-wing Cause in America).

            As the Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry has shown, the Lutheran authors of the 19th century were believers who taught faith in Christ and maintained an unequivocal trust in the truth of the Scriptures. That is what makes the books of Krauth, Jacobs, Schmauk, and many others so valuable today. They explain the Scriptures rather than substituting their own evasions for the truth.

            This change in Biblical views, so easily seen in all denominations today, is directly involved in replacing the faithful Greek text – the Majority Text or Traditional Text  of the KJV– for a constantly changing version of the Wescott Hort jigsaw puzzle. Wescott Hort, under the management of Nestle Alan, is now accepted as universal for all denominations. This Universal Bible Society text was marshaled by appealing to cooperation among Protestants and Roman Catholics and creatively paraphrased by the Eugene Nida translation theories. Now the present many versions of the Bible God Would Have Revealed If He Were As Wise as Wescott, Hort, Alan, and Nida.

            We are living in the Age of the Great Apostasy, the visible Church ruled by those who once believed the basics of the Christian Faith but now resent those blockheads who insist on the King James Version, the classic hymns, the historic liturgy. Apostasy is far more dangerous than atheism, because the liberated minds and consciences bitterly resent the old ways and those who represent them. Guided by their Father Below, they have systematically destroyed church music, the sermon, the liturgy, the Creeds, and the gracious message of forgiveness and salvation through Christ the Savior.

            This should alarm some people – those who attend seminary and college in their denomination are quietly guided to use every translation except one with King James in the title. Divinity schools offering genuine PhDs are even more exacting. The publication houses, hymnals, and educational materials are established in the same Wescott Hort world view, with great riches enjoyed by constantly replacing hymnals and other materials.

            Why do the denomination leaders go radical on books that advocate for the King James Version? If they want to use guilt by association, a logical fallacy treasured by many today, do they dare look closely at their heroes of text and Biblical scholarship?