Thursday, February 18, 2021

From a Former WELS Student - Martin Luther College - Animal House.
WELS Discussions, Facebook

 


WELS Discussions - Facebook

So, with all the people exposing LPS, and others. It’s time to talk college. First on the list is MLC.

While most people have a great time at MLC, both times I went I did not. I did however meet wonderful people on that campus who will remain forever friends, and teachers that I appreciate and admire.

•First, let’s talk about an experience that happened to a friend of mine. My friend has struggled with mental health issues such as depression and anxiety for a really long time. When brought to the attention of a person in authority, they literally told them, that “that’s not very Christian like of you.” My friend eventually left that campus after a short time. 

•Someone else I know had their roommate be intimate with their partner in the room that they shared. After bringing it up with multiple RAs and staff members, nothing happened.

•The boys dormitory (specifically concord hall) is actually atrocious. Men walk around hallways naked during open dorms, obscene music is heard blasted down the corridors, and not to mention it smells awful. When a friend of mine talked to the tutor in the hall they said “oh, they’ll grow up.” -BUT THEY’RE ADULTS.

•Another friend of mine left within their first month at MLC. MLC practically forced them to leave because they thought that they were “unfit for ministry” because they have a disability. Because they didn’t fit the cookie cutter image that MLC wants to portray. Not to mention they were constantly the target of bullying from other students.

•Teachers hazed the same friend from the first story because they weren’t getting good enough grades even though they were going to tutors and I was helping them with homework and studying so much that they decided to quit church and ministry all together.

•A teacher of mine made us make memes about the Bible. My friends and I got kicked out of his class for not complying to do the assignment. (Because the Bible is ya know, sacred) that’s what YOUR hard earned money is getting donated to. And yes, we pay $27,000 a year to do stupid stuff like making memes in BHL instead of actually learning.

•MLC’s building a brand new sports facility and some fancy new dorms to “compete with other colleges.” Even though we have a perfectly good sports facility right down the hill from campus. Plus, people aren’t going to MLC because they want to have an actual college experience, but because they want to serve their Savior.

 •MLC students frequently get MINORS from LPS,MLS, etc. DRUNK on their junior focus trip. It’s not just a sin- it’s against the law. The campus is aware but nothing has happened of course. 

•MLC throws ravers and parties and minors get wasted pretty much every weekend.

•Weed is common on campus.- it’s still illegal in MN.

•People at MLC are two-faced as much as they are at LPS. 

•If you’re “WELS- royalty” getting caught with/doing anything bad pretty much means you’re getting away with it. 

• hazing isn’t as bad as I remember, but I mean... that wasn’t my experience.

• someone junior year got a letter sent to their home from MLC telling them they they were not “fit for ministry” even though they had average grades.

•MLC only cares about the paycheck.

My experience at MLC:

Becides the fact they hurt my friends, my experience overall was average. As someone who went to LPS, I was well aware of what I was getting into.

The second time was much worse than the first.

Have fun transferring to MLC from other colleges. 

Barely any credits transfer if you end up lucky. You’ll have to repeat grades even though you have enough college credits to be a junior. I understand taking religion classes, but I was in classes that were general education classes, with people 3+ years younger than I was. I was re-learning information. I also was newly married and live 50 minutes away. I understand having a policy for on campus students about tardiness/missing classes. But when I was working 60 hour weeks at my minimum wage job to keep us living, I think there should be more understanding. 

A teacher told me “school is your first priority.” And  after missing like 2 classes, you fail.  After we went entirely online, my depression and exhaustion from working so much got so bad that I just gave up entirely, and ended up dropping out. Currently I have decided I will not return. I know that others have good experiences but I did not. 

Plus, for being a Christian institution people don’t act like Christians.

Our Weather - Strange


Our second snow came yesterday, on top of mushy then frozen snow from the days before. The side roads are unplowed. Intersections are treacherous. Ranger Bob took me to the store to get a few items - four-wheel drive Chevy Silverado. The one-mile trip was uneventful. 

He was angry we had no cashiers. One worker said, "One hundred people called in today. We don't have enough people." Bob apologized - he hates the robot check-outs.

The bread aisle was empty rather than packed with bread. The aisle is so long it fades into the distance. I have seen categories disappear for storms and other reasons. I never saw the bread disappear like cleaning products.

At home I opened up the Ft. Knox of bird food - 20 pounds of sunflower seeds. Like us, the birds learn gratitude from shortages. I put a pyramid of seeds on each barrel and rang the chimes. All day long the birds and squirrels came in groups, retiring to the next group eat.

Three crows landed and ate a short time. Spotting me at the window made them go to a new location.

Male and female cardinals ate patiently. They have the strongest beaks for opening seeds, so they seem to smirk while going through the quota.

Blue jays are quick to fly in and leave with some food.

Starlings come in a large group and take over the barrel - until one of them spots me and leads everyone up to the branches again. They loiter between serving times, ready to occupy and devour. 

Juncos or snowbirds quietly peck through the snow and seeds, either on the barrel or the ground.

Chickadees grab their seed, one at a time, and fly to a safe branch so they can hold the seed with their feet and hammer the seed open with their beaks.

A downy woodpecker stopped for food. His red beany made him especially prominent. I also heard woodpecker noise as one hammered on a tree. 

Wednesday, February 17, 2021

Ash Wednesday, 2021. Luther's Galatians



Ash Wednesday Service Video - Chapter 1 of Luther's Galatians.
The photo is from Sexagesima Sunday.




Ash Wednesday, 2021, 7 PM Central

 

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

 

https://video.ibm.com/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

 

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 7 PM CentralTime

 

The Hymn #552           Abide with Me 

            

The Order of Vespers                                                p. 41

The Psalmody               Psalm 1                              p. 123

The Lections                 Joel 2:12-19

Matthew 6:16-2

 

The Sermon Hymn #578   Lord, While For All Mankind We Pray        

 

The Sermon –   Galatians 1

The Prayers

The Lord’s Prayer

The Collect for Grace                                       p. 45

 

The Hymn #654        Now the Day Is Over          


Today the death of Rush Limbaugh was announced. 

He believed in Christ as his Savior and brought America back to Constitutional principles, not completely, but as much as one man could. 

 

 

KJV Joel 2:12 Therefore also now, saith the LORD, turn ye even to me with all your heart, and with fasting, and with weeping, and with mourning: 13 And rend your heart, and not your garments, and turn unto the LORD your God: for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repenteth him of the evil. 14 Who knoweth if he will return and repent, and leave a blessing behind him; even a meat offering and a drink offering unto the LORD your God? 15 Blow the trumpet in Zion, sanctify a fast, call a solemn assembly: 16 Gather the people, sanctify the congregation, assemble the elders, gather the children, and those that suck the breasts: let the bridegroom go forth of his chamber, and the bride out of her closet. 17 Let the priests, the ministers of the LORD, weep between the porch and the altar, and let them say, Spare thy people, O LORD, and give not thine heritage to reproach, that the heathen should rule over them: wherefore should they say among the people, Where is their God? 18 Then will the LORD be jealous for his land, and pity his people. 19 Yea, the LORD will answer and say unto his people, Behold, I will send you corn, and wine, and oil, and ye shall be satisfied therewith: and I will no more make you a reproach among the heathen:

 


 

 

KJV Matthew 6:16 Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. 17 But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face; 18 That thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly. 19 Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: 20 But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: 21 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

 

Galatians 1

 

We have two commentaries on Galatians by Luther, the shorter one used here and the longer one, which is even better – but much longer. We debated using the longer one but decided 100% of the short is one better than 1% of the longer one.

The editors of the Formula of Concord, in Article III, The Righteousness of Faith, commended the Galatians Commentary to anyone who wished to know more about Justification by Faith.

 

FC, III, #67 Concerning what is needful furthermore for the proper explanation of this profound and chief article of justification before God, upon which depends the salvation of our souls, we direct, and for the sake of brevity herewith refer, every one to Dr. Luther’s beautiful and glorious exposition of the Epistle of St. Paul to the Galatians.

 

Lest anyone wonder about the Chief Article’s actual definition – here it is –

 

FC, III, #6. This article concerning justification by faith (as the Apology says) is the chief article in the entire Christian doctrine, without which no poor conscience can have any firm consolation, or can truly know the riches of the grace of Christ, as Dr. Luther also has written: If this only article remains pure on the battlefield, the Christian Church also remains pure, and in goodly harmony and without any sects; but if it does not remain pure, it is not possible that any error or fanatical spirit can be resisted.

 

This FC passage unites Melanchthon (Augsburg Confession and Apology), Luther (all his works), and Chemnitz (senior editor of the Book of Concord) in the same confession, contrary to the fakes at the Emmaus Conference, Webber and Buchholz, plus Zarling and Bivens. Early, LCMS and WELS taught Justification by Faith. Little Andrea has a Gausewitz. Missouri officially recognized Justification by Faith though the Stephan-Walther-Pieper faction gradually took over with OJ.

 

1 Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;) 2 And all the brethren which are with me, unto the churches of Galatia: 3 Grace be to you and peace from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ, 4 Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the will of God and our Father: 5 To whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

 

Luther in blue:

The world bears the Gospel a grudge because the Gospel condemns the religious wisdom of the world. Jealous for its own religious views, the world in turn charges the Gospel with being a subversive and licentious doctrine, offensive to God and man, a doctrine to be persecuted as the worst plague on earth.

As a result, we have this paradoxical situation: The Gospel supplies the world with the salvation of Jesus Christ, peace of conscience, and every blessing. Just for that the world abhors the Gospel.

These Jewish-Christian fanatics who pushed themselves into the Galatian churches after Paul’s departure, boasted that they were the descendants of Abraham, true ministers of Christ, having been trained by the apostles themselves, that they were able to perform miracles.

In every way they sought to undermine the authority of St. Paul. They said to the Galatians: “You have no right to think highly of Paul. He was the last to turn to Christ. But we have seen Christ. We heard Him preach. Paul came later and is beneath us. It is possible for us to be in error—we who have received the Holy Ghost? Paul stands alone. He has not seen Christ, nor has he had much contact with the other apostles. Indeed, he persecuted the Church of Christ for a long time.”

 

Galatians 1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

Luther

How patiently Paul deals with his seduced Galatians! He does not pounce on them but, like a father, he fairly excuses their error. With motherly affection he talks to them yet he does it in a way that at the same time he also reproves them. On the other hand, he is highly indignant at the seducers whom he blames for the apostasy of the Galatians. His anger bursts forth in elemental fury at the beginning of his epistle. “If any may,” he cries, “preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.” Later on, in the fifth chapter, he threatens the false apostles with damnation. “He that troubleth you shall bear his judgment, whosoever he be.” He pronounces a curse upon them. “I would they were even cut off which trouble you.”

He might have addressed the Galatians after this fashion: “I am ashamed of you. Your ingratitude grieves me. I am angry with you.” But his purpose was to call them back to the Gospel. With this purpose in his mind he speaks very gently to them. He could not have chosen a milder expression than this, “I marvel.” It indicates his sorrow and his displeasure.

Paul minds the rule which he himself lays down in a later chapter where he says: “Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.” Toward those who have been misled we are to show ourselves parentally affectionate, so that they may perceive that we seek not their destruction but their salvation. Over against the devil and his missionaries, the authors of false doctrines and sects, we ought to be like the Apostle, impatient, and rigorously condemnatory, as parents are with the dog that bites their little one, but the weeping child itself they soothe. with their power over the ministry.

10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ. 11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. 12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ. 13 For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews' religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it: 14 And profited in the Jews' religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.

Luther:

This passage constitutes Paul’s chief defense against the accusations of his opponents. He maintains under oath that he received his Gospel not from men, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.

In declaring that his Gospel is not after man, Paul does not merely wish to state that his Gospel is not mundane. The false apostles made the same claim for their gospel. Paul means to say that he learned his Gospel not in the usual and accepted manner through the agency of men by hearing, reading, or writing. He received the Gospel by special revelation directly from Jesus Christ.

Paul received his Gospel on the way to Damascus when Christ appeared to him. St. Luke furnishes an account of the incident in the ninth chapter of the Book of Acts. “Arise,” said Christ to Paul, “and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do.” Christ did not send Paul into the city to learn the Gospel from Ananias. Ananias was only to baptize Paul, to lay his hands-on Paul, to commit the ministry of the Word unto Paul, and to recommend him to the Church. Ananias recognized his limited assignment when he said to Paul: “Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost.” Paul did not receive instruction from Ananias. Paul had already been called, enlightened, and taught by Christ in the road. His contact with Ananias was merely a testimonial to the fact that Paul had been called by Christ to preach the Gospel.


 

15 But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called me by his grace, 16 To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood: 17 Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus. 18 Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days. 19 But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother.20 Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not. 21 Afterwards I came into the regions of Syria and Cilicia; 22 And was unknown by face unto the churches of Judaea which were in Christ: 23 But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed. 24 And they glorified God in me.

Luther:

“I went to Arabia before I saw any of the apostles. I took it upon myself to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles without delay, because Christ had called me for that purpose.” This statement refutes the assertion of the false apostles that Paul had been a pupil of the apostles, from which the false apostles inferred that Paul had been instructed in the obedience of the Law, that therefore the Gentiles also ought to keep the Law and submit to circumcision.

18, 19. Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days. But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord’s brother.

Paul minutely recounts his personal history to stop the cavil of the false apostles. Paul does not deny that he had been with some of the apostles. He went to Jerusalem uninvited, not to be instructed, but to visit with Peter. Luke reports the occasion in the ninth chapter of the Book of Acts. Barnabas introduced Paul to the apostles and related to them how Paul had met the Lord Jesus on the way to Damascus, also how Paul had preached boldly at Damascus in the name of Jesus. Paul says that he saw Peter and James, but he denies that he learned anything from them.

Why does Paul harp on this seemingly unimportant fact? To convince the churches of Galatia that his Gospel was the true Word of Christ which he learned from Christ Himself and from no man. Paul was forced to affirm and re-affirm this fact. His usefulness to all the churches that had used him as their pastor and teacher was at stake.

20.         Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not.

Was it necessary for Paul to go under oath? Yes. Paul is reporting personal history. How else would the churches believe him? The false apostles might say, “Who knows whether Paul is telling the truth?” Paul, the elect vessel of God, was held in so little esteem by his own Galatians to whom he had preached Christ that it was necessary for him to swear an oath that he spoke the truth. If this happened to Paul, what business have we to complain when people doubt our words, or hold us in little regard, we who cannot begin to compare ourselves with the Apostle?

 

 




Free PDF - Understanding Luther's Galatians

This is the download link to the free PDF.
The print copy is on on Amazon.





Rest in Peace - Rush Limbaugh Has Died

We just heard on TV - Rush Limbaugh has died.




Cub Editor of Calvinist News on What He Does Not Know about Communion

 Christian News continues to be a mixture of Calvinism (right) and rationalistic Pietism (Profesor Knapp, Halle University)




If people want to use distance Holy Communion and pastors want to provide it, why does Hale get his Geneva gown in a knot about it?

Hale also says that Justification by Faith is "just a phrase." True it is a phrase used many times in the New Testament and expressed from Genesis 15:6 on - in the Old Testament. But all his blabbering in the language of Halle University and Calvin's Geneva is nothing more than the feeble protests of a bishop wannabee.

He should read this book, published by Christian News:

Maier earned a PhD in Semitics and invented radio evangelism. Did he imagine that his talks about the inerrant Word of God were ineffective over the airwaves? Poor Hale knows nothing about the efficacy of the Word and the Means of Grace, phrases seldom found in Calvinism and Pietism.


I am guessing that the vast majority of Lutheran congregations have not provided for broadcasting their worship services, with or without Holy Communion. Did their synods and pastors do them a favor, caught flat-footed in the Covid shutdowns? Many chose not to have services at all, after all these months.

Hale's argument is as retrograde as it could be, suggesting that anything other than the Word within the nave is forbidden! No Hammond organ. No microphones. No screens (a idea, actually). 

Would Hale rage against those pastors who hold no services? That would step on too many tender Ft. Wayne toes. 

Our New Snow - KJV and Greek Books Arrive.
The Bible Book: Corrupted Scripture Texts and Dishonest Translations

 

Cardinals by Norma A. Boeckler

My students are scattered around the US, and the ones from Texas are barely able to get a message out - to let me know they are trying. No one will be marked late during these two weeks of snow and cold.

We had our faucets on for another night of extreme cold. I figured overdoing it would be cheaper than underdoing it and waiting for a plumber.


KJV and Greek Books

I always shop Alibris first for used books. I was sure that text criticism and Greek New Testaments would be a bargain. Wrong! Think $100, hundreds, $500 for one obscure book!

My Wescott Hort Greek New Testament came - $5 - so I have a visual of the radical, pieced together text that dethroned the reliable Majority Text and became the standard for all future Greek New Testaments. 

I also got the Nestle Aland Greek New Testament on sale at $40. That gives the notes for all the changes to the Greek New Testament, but still follows the Wescott Hort, which took over and excommunicated the Majority Text, which is also called the Textus Receptus, or the Byzantine or Stephanos. 

Let's Group Them

Group A - The Greek New Testament before Wescott and Hort (1880) had slight variations in the manuscript evidence, but they all relied on the vast majority of manuscripts, which agree with each other. This is the basis for the KJV New Testament. Ancient lectionaries, translations, and versions belong to this group too.

Group B - The Wescott Hort, various other editions, and Nestle Aland rely on Tischendorf's Sinaiticus and Vaticanus codices - plus some invented, irrelevant rules (like "the more difficult the reading for the believer, the better"). This is the basis for almost all modern translations and versions, the work for all the Bible societies, and the only one accepted by "Biblical scholars."


 Female Cardinal by Norma A. Boeckler


Tuesday, February 16, 2021

The Bible Book - Nida Working with Rome - Good News Bible

 

Didn't we all have a copy when it came out in 1966?


Nida was involved with the Church of Rome once he broke with SIL-Wycliffe.


Today’s English Version – Good News for Modern Man – Bad News for the Bible

            Modern translations do not sprout on their own. Someone must decide a direction for them and find the money for the project and initial printing. When Robert Bratcher got in trouble, as a Southern Baptist missionary teacher, for arguing against the Trinity, Nida hired him.

O Jornal Batista, on July 9, 1953:

“Jesus Christ would not enjoy omniscience. That is an attribute of God.”

“…Jesus did not claim He and the Father to be one—which would be absurd.”[1]

 

Bratcher got into so much trouble with the American Bible Society, for similar taunts that he resigned from the ABS while moving to the United Bible Societies. He is given credit for guiding the translation of Today’s English Version, often called the Good News Bible.

Bratcher Obituary

Working for the American Bible Society, employing an approach to translation known as “dynamic equivalence,” and rendering the text in simple, everyday English, Bob Bratcher produced an English translation of the New Testament that was published in 1966 as Good News for Modern Man: The New Testament in Today’s English Version; by 1971 it had sold 30 million copies, and by now over 100 million copies have been distributed. Bob went on to chair a team of scholars that translated the Old Testament in the same accessible style, leading to the publication of The Good News Bible in 1976. These translations have been deeply meaningful to many around the world; they also have been controversial among some fundamentalist Christians. Bob Bratcher’s contributions to Biblical studies extended far beyond his initial translations. He made extensive contributions to a common-language Brazilian Portuguese translation of the Bible, published in 1988. Working with United Bible Societies, he wrote or co-wrote numerous “Helps for Translators,” each one focusing in detail on issues involved in translating a particular book of the Bible, including Psalms, The Gospel of Matthew, and Revelation. He also wrote scholarly essays on translation issues, among other works, and lectured all over the world. Bob was a faithful and active member of Binkley Baptist Church in Chapel Hill since he moved to the area in 1975. He served the Binkley community as a teacher, preacher and wise elder, and will be dearly missed. He also was a strong proponent of compassion for the less fortunate, justice for the oppressed, and world peace.[2]

Those who object to hiring and honoring such infidels are given a story about “he no longer works here” or “has that damaged your faith?”

Eugene Nida United Protestants and Roman Catholics           

            The story of Today’s English Version - also called Good News for Modern Man, and the Good News Bible - is wrapped up in Nida’s efforts to combine all church bodies in unified efforts, using his dynamic equivalence dogma. Consider this fact – that Nida worked with the American Bible Society, the Unified Bible Societies, and Nestle
Aland Greek text editions. Not only were all translations unified under Nida, but the Wescott Hort text was given the textual apparatus and dignity of German scholarship. Therefore, the actual meaning of the Majority Text no longer mattered, and the fanciful invented text could be erased and modified on a regular basis.[3]

            Nida did not accomplish this alone, but took advantage of the mood and money available to unify all church efforts through para-church agencies. The Church of Rome had a growing problem with being centered in staples of Medieval dogma – veneration of Mary, presenting Jesus as the angry judge, and placing the Pope over the Scriptures, which made the Bible almost unknown and unknowable – with hierarchy being the only guide. Although the Church of Rome is “ever the same,” it used ecumenism to soften its image and to move into Protestant plans, as shown by Rome’s three-year lectionary and its parament colors used by the ELCA, LCMS, WELS, and ELS. Both the Scripture change and parament pivot happened without a fuss among all the congregations. There were reasons to object as a witness against Rome’s false doctrine, Mariology, and Purgatory, but the Lutheran bishops love to enforce their will just as much as the Vatican does. Thus, the little Antichrists aid and abet the Antichrist, the Papacy.

Wikipedia says this about Nida in 1968, but the dates are earlier for the start of work with Rome. Communications started 15 years earlier, scarcely by accident.

Nida was instrumental in engineering the joint effort between the Vatican and the United Bible Society (UBS) to produce cross-denominational Bibles in translations across the globe. This work began in 1968 and was carried on in accordance with Nida's translation principle of Functional Equivalence.[4]

His own account of the start of cooperation with Rome began in Hong Kong, 1953, the year when he resigned from SIL and Wycliffe, where the doctrinal stances of its leaders were being examined closely:

 

On one visit to Hong Kong I had a telephone call from a local Roman Catholic priest that I had met a year or so before. He and his colleagues were anxious to talk about the possibility of cooperation in translating the Bible into Chinese because the existing text, called the Union Version and influenced heavily in exegesis and style by the English Revised Version, was not adequate for either Protestants or Roman Catholics. He then proposed that we meet for a week the next time I was in Hong Kong in order to explore possibilities of cooperation.[5]

The marks of unionism (often called ecumenism) can be seen in these changes, making text and translation projects Catholic, Lutheran, and Protestant:

·        A difference in doctrine which hitherto has been regarded as divisive, is suddenly made to lose its divisive significance.

·        Differences in doctrine are made to lose their divisive significance with a view to uniting hitherto separate churches.

·        A formula of unification is found which each of two hitherto separate churches may accept but which each of them interprets differently. An external bond is found for internally divided groups.

·        The unionist declares that every one may continue to hold his own private convictions and merely needs to respect and tolerate those of another.[6]

There is no better description of the tactics used by Protestants today, including the conservative Lutheran groups who work with ELCA.

Leaving work at SIL-Wycliffe work allowed Nida to pursue bigger projects with the Roman Catholic Church. The old barriers were down for Nida and the United Bible Societies, which became the World Council of Churches for the ecumenical Scriptures. UBS consists of 150 Bible societies. The World Council of Churches includes these full member groups:

·        Eastern Orthodoxy

·        Lutheran Churches

·        Anglicans

·        Mennonites

·        Moravians

·        Reformed (Calvinist)

·        Baptist

·        Methodist

·        Pentecostal

·        The WCC has a working group to support partnership with Rome. However,Rome is not a full member of the WCC because would be a demotion for the “One True Church, The Indefectible Mother of Us All.”

Members of mainline churches may not know they are contributing offering funds to the World Council of Churches and the radical, similar (American) National Council of Churches. For many years, the local Hunger Walks supported the NCC, but the local sponsors denied it…more than three times.[7] One parish pastor yelled on the phone that I was lying. I said, “Even if I supported it, and I don’t, the parish council would refuse.” The phone was slammed down hard in those good, old days when my obstinacy was punished with a phone in the cradle slam.

            This leads into the real Nida production of a Protestant-Catholic Bible, before that magical 1968 date “when he began with Rome”. He went along with a moderate revision of a respected Spanish Bible called the Reina-Velara in 1960. That led to the Version Popular, the Spanish exemplar for Good News for Modern Man: The New Testament in Today’s English Version, 1966. The Spanish version came out in May, and the English in September, celebrating the 150th anniversary of the American Bible Society. There was great excitement and discussion about this new Bible and its Spanish heritage. “It is simplified for anyone to read,” and incredible numbers sold, because Rome was also involved in its production and promotion.

 

           

 

 

 


 



[1] Why They Changed the Bible, p. 105. Denial of the Holy Trinity is common among apostates, who dishonestly play the role of a Christian while undermining Biblical teaching.

[3] Aland wrote haughtily in his book that the Greek words of the text were taken away one year and added back on the next year.

[5] Nida, Fascinated by Languages, cited in Why Did They Change the Bible, p. 64.

[7] Annual reports of denominations disclose a certain amount of information, but they hide the most radical use of offering and endowment funds.