Saturday, February 11, 2023

Luther's Sexagesima Sermon on the Sower and the Seed -- Luke 8:4-15



SEXAGESIMA SUNDAY.
   


TEXT:

Luke 8:4-15. And when a great multitude came together, and they of every city resorted unto him, he spake by a parable:

The sower went forth to sow his seed: and as he sowed, some fell by the way side; and it was trodden under foot, and the birds of the heaven devoured it. And other fell amidst the thorns; and the thorns grew with it, and choked it. And other fell into the good ground, and grew, and brought forth fruit a hundredfold. As he said these things, he cried, He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.

And his disciples asked him what this parable might be. And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to the rest in parables; that seeing they may not see, and hearing they may not understand. Now the parable is this: The seed is the Word of God. And those by the way side are they that have heard; then cometh the devil, and taketh away the Word from their heart, that they may not believe and be saved. And those on the rock are they who, when they have heard, receive the Word with joy; and these have no root, who for a while believe, and in the time of temptation fall away. And that which fell among the thorns, these are they that have heard, and as they go on their way they are choked with cares and riches and pleasures of this life, and bring no fruit to perfection. And that in the good ground, these are such as in an honest and good heart, having heard the Word, hold it fast, and bring forth fruit with patience.


I. THE NATURE OF THE WORD SPOKEN HERE.

1. This Gospel treats of the disciples and the fruits, which the Word of God develops in the world. It does not speak of the law nor of human institutions; but, as Christ himself says, of the Word of God, which he himself the sower preaches, for the law bears no fruit, just as little as do the institutions of men. Christ however sets forth here four kinds of disciples of the divine Word.

II. THE DISCIPLES OF THIS WORD.

2. The first class of disciples are those who hear the Word but neither understand nor esteem it. And these are not the mean people in the world, but the greatest, wisest and the most saintly, in short they are the greatest part of mankind; for Christ does not speak here of those who persecute the Word nor of those who fail to give their ear to it, but of those who hear it and are students of it, who also wish to be called true Christians and to live in Christian fellowship with Christians and are partakers of baptism and the Lord’s Supper. But they are of a carnal heart, and remain so, failing to appropriate the Word of God to themselves, it goes in one ear and out the other. Just like the seed along the wayside did not fall into the earth, but remained lying on the ground in the wayside, because the road was tramped hard by the feet of man and beast and it could not take root.

3. Therefore Christ says the devil cometh and taketh away the Word from their heart, that they may not believe and be saved. What power of Satan this alone reveals, that hearts, hardened through a worldly mind and life, lose the Word and let it go, so that they never understand or confess it; but instead of the Word of God Satan sends false teachers to tread it under foot by the doctrines of men. For it stands here written both that it was trodden under foot, and the birds of the heaven devoured it. The birds Christ himself interprets as the messengers of the devil, who snatch away the Word and devour it, which is done when he turns and blinds their hearts so that they neither understand nor esteem it, as St. Paul says in 2 Timothy 4:4: “They will turn away their ears from the truth, and turn aside unto fables.” By the treading under foot of men Christ means the teachings of men, that rule in our hearts, as he says in Matthew 5:13 also of the salt that has lost its savor, it is cast out and trodden under foot of men; that is, as St. Paul says in 2 Thessalonians 2:11, they must believe a lie because they have not been obedient to the truth.

4. Thus all heretics, fanatics and sects belong to this number, who understand the Gospel in a carnal way and explain it as they please, to suit their own ideas, all of whom hear the Gospel and yet they bear no fruit, yea, more, they are governed by Satan and are harder oppressed by human institutions than they were before they heard the Word. For it is a dreadful utterance that Christ here gives that the devil taketh away the Word from their hearts, by which he clearly proves that the devil rules mightily in their hearts, notwithstanding they are called Christians and hear the Word.

Likewise it sounds terribly that they are to be trodden under foot, and must be subject unto men and to their ruinous teachings, by which under the appearance and name of the Gospel the devil takes the Word from them, so that they may never believe and be saved, but must be lost forever; as the fanatical spirits of our day do in all lands. For where this Word is not, there is no salvation, and great works or holy lives avail nothing, for with this, that he says: “They shall not be saved,” since they have not the Word, he shows forcibly enough, that not their works but their faith in the Word alone saves, as Paul says to the Romans: “It is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth.” Romans 1:16.

5. The second class of hearers are those who receive the Word with joy, but they do not persevere. These are also a large multitude who understand the Word correctly and lay hold of it in its purity without any spirit of sect, division or fanaticism, they rejoice also in that they know the real truth, and are able to know how they may be saved without works through faith.

They also know that they are free from the bondage of the law, of their conscience and of human teachings; but when it comes to the test that they must suffer harm, disgrace and loss of life or property, then they fall and deny it; for they have not root enough, and are not planted deep enough in the soil. Hence they are like the growth on a rock, which springs forth fresh and green, that it is a pleasure to behold it and it awakens bright hopes. But when the sun shines hot it withers, because it has no soil and moisture, and only rock is there. So these do; in times of persecution they deny or keep silence about the Word, and work, speak and suffer all that their persecutors mention or wish, who formerly went forth and spoke, and confessed with a fresh and joyful spirit the same, while there was still peace and no heat, so that there was hope they would bear much fruit and serve the people. For these fruits are not only the works, but more the confession, preaching and spreading of the Word, so that many others may thereby be converted and the kingdom of God be developed.

6. The third class are those who hear and understand the Word, but still it falls on the other side of the road, among the pleasures and cares of this life, so that they also do nothing with the Word. And there is quite a large multitude of these; for although they do not start heresies, like the first, but always possess the absolutely pure Word, they are also not attacked on the left as the others with opposition and persecution; yet they fall on the right side, and it is their ruin that they enjoy peace and good days. Therefore they do not earnestly give themselves to the Word, but become indifferent and sink in the cares, riches and pleasures of this life, so that they are of no benefit to any one. Therefore they are like the seed that fell among the thorns. Although it is not rocky but good soil; not wayside but deeply plowed soil; yet, the thorns will not let it spring up, they choke it. Thus these have all in the Word that is needed for their salvation, but they do not make any use of it, and they rot in this life in carnal pleasures. To these belong those who hear the Word but do not bring under subjection their flesh. They know their duty but do it not, they teach but do not practice what they teach, and are this year as they were last.

7. The fourth class are those who lay hold of and keep the Word in a good and honest heart, and bring forth fruit with patience, those who hear the Word and steadfastly retain it, meditate upon it and act in harmony with it.

The devil does not snatch it away, nor are they thereby led astray, moreover the heat of persecution does not rob them of it, and the thorns of pleasure and the avarice of the times do not hinder its growth; but they bear fruit by teaching others and by developing the kingdom of God, hence they also do good to their neighbor in love; and therefore Christ adds, “they bring forth fruit with patience.” For these must suffer much on account of the Word, shame and disgrace from fanatics and heretics, hatred and jealousy with injury to body and property from their persecutors, not to mention what the thorns and the temptations of their own flesh do, so that it may well be called the Word of the cross; for he who would keep it must bear the cross and misfortune, and triumph.

8. He says: “In honest and good hearts.” Like a field, that is without a thorn or brush, cleared and spacious, as a beautiful clean place: so a heart is also cleared and clean, broad and spacious, that is without cares and avarice as to temporal needs, so that the Word of God truly finds lodgment there. But the field is good, not only when it lies there cleared and level, but when it is also rich and fruitful, possesses soil and is productive, and not like a stony and gravelly field. Just so is the heart that has good soil and with a full spirit is strong, fertile and good to keep the Word and bring forth fruit with patience.

9. Here we see why it is no wonder there are so few true Christians, for all the seed does not fall into good ground, but only the fourth and small part; and that they are not to be trusted who boast they are Christians and praise the teaching of the Gospel; like Demas, a disciple of St. Paul, who forsook him at last, 2 Timothy 4:10; like the disciples of Jesus, who turned their backs to him. John 6:66. For Christ himself cries out here: “He that hath ears to hear, let him hear,” as if he should say: O, how few true Christians there are; one dare not believe all to be Christians who are called Christians and hear the Gospel, more is required than that.

10. All this is spoken for our instruction, that we may not go astray, since so many misuse the Gospel and few lay hold of it aright. True it is unpleasant to preach to those who treat the Gospel so shamefully and even oppose it. For preaching is to become so universal that the Gospel is to be proclaimed to all creatures, as Christ says in Mark 16:15: “Preach the Gospel to the whole creation;” and Psalm 19:4: “Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world.” What business is it of mine that many do not esteem it? It must be that many are called but few are chosen. For the sake of the good ground that brings forth fruit with patience, the seed must also fall fruitless by the wayside, on the rock and among the thorns; inasmuch as we are assured that the Word of God does not go forth without bearing some fruit, but it always finds also good ground; as Christ says here, some seed of the sower falls also into good ground, and not only by the wayside, among the thorns and on stony ground. For where-ever the Gospel goes you will find Christians. “My word shall not return unto me void.” Isaiah 55:11.

III. THE FRUIT OF THIS WORD.

11. Here observe that Mark 4:8 and Matthew 13:8 say the seed yielded fruit some thirty, some sixty and some a hundredfold, which according to all interpretations is understood of three kinds of chastity, that of virgins, married persons and widows; and virgins are credited with a hundredfold of fruit, wedded persons with thirtyfold, the least of all, and widows with sixtyfold. But this is such coarse and corrupt talk that it is a sin and a shame that this interpretation has continued so long in Christendom and has been advocated by so many noted teachers, and criticized by none of them. In this one perceives how many wide-awake, well-armed and faithful teachers the church has had heretofore, and how one blindly believed another, and how God allowed many noted saints and people to play the fool so completely in these important matters pertaining to the soul that he warned us to believe no teacher, however saintly and great he may be, unless he comes with the pure Word of God.

12. First, it would be doing the Word of God injustice to hold that it brings forth no other fruit than chastity, since St. Paul boasts quite differently in Galatians 5:22. In brief, the Word of God accomplishes all good, it makes us wise, sensible, prudent, cautious, pious, kind, patient, faithful, discreet, chaste, etc. Hence this comment referring only to three kinds of chastity is wholly unchristian. The heathen and wicked people, who neither possess the Gospel nor persecute it, have also virgins, widows and married persons. Doubtless Anna and Caiaphas had been properly married. Thus there were virgins, widows and consorts before the Word of God; for virgins were born, and when the Gospel comes it finds virgins, widows and wives; the Gospel did not first make them virgins, widows or wives.

13. Secondly, thus marriage, virginity and widowhood are not fruits, nor virtues, nor good works; but three stations or states in life created and ordained by God, and are not creatures of our power. They are divine works and creations like all other creatures. For if it should be valid to interpret a station or state in life as good fruit, one would have to say the state of a lord, a servant, a man, a child and of officers was only fruit of the Gospel; in this way there would be no fruit at all left for the Gospel, since such states or callings are found everywhere regardless of the Gospel. But the chastity of virgins is paraded thus for the sake of a show, to the great danger and injury of immortal souls; just as if no virtue adorns a Christian but virginity.

14. I will say further, that chastity is a different and a far higher thing than virginity, and is nothing more than that a woman has never been under any obligation to a man. Besides, however, it is possible that a virgin has not only a desire and a passion for man, in harmony with the character and nature of her female body; but she must also be full of blood and life in order to bear children and multiply the race, for which God created her, and that creation is not her work but God’s alone. Therefore that woman may not hinder God’s work, nature as created by God must take its course, whether children be born or not. But chastity must indeed be a state of a woman’s mind that has no or little desire for man, and has in her body also little or no seed to bear fruit or children.

15. Now it is generally the case that a married woman does not so often experience such desire and lust, such a flow of love or life; for she will be relieved of the same by or through her husband; and besides, where a virgin has only passion in the thoughts of her heart and in the seed of her body, a married woman has much displeasure mingled with the pleasure of her husband, so that to speak in common terms, the high and best chastity is in the married state, because in it is the least lust and passion, while the least chastity is in the state of virgins, because in it there is much more lust and passion. Therefore chastity is a virtue far above virginity; for we call a bride still a virgin, although she is indeed full of desire, passion and love for her bridegroom. Chastity waves high over all three states, over marriage, over widowhood and over virginity. But when God does not work wonders it sinks low and exists most in the married state and least in the state of virgins, and there are not three kinds of chastity, but three states of chastity.

16. True, when we consider virginity according to its outward appearance, it seems great that a woman restrains herself and never satisfies her desires with a man. But what does it help if persons restrain their passions longer without a man or a woman and then satisfy them more than with a man or woman? Is there not more unchastity where there is greater lust, love, lewdness and sensation than where there is less? Therefore to calculate according to the amount of lust and sensation, as unchastity should be considered, virginity is more unchaste than the state of marriage. This is very apparent among prostitutes, who are virgins and yet are very forward and obscene, and cherish greater thoughts of the sin than the sin itself is. In short, I wonder if there is a virgin twenty years of age, who has a healthy, perfect female body.

17. This is enough concerning chastity, that we know how the fruits of the Word must be understood differently and in a wider sense than pertaining to chastity, and be applied especially to the fruits, by which many are converted and come to the knowledge of the truth. For although works are also called fruits, yet Christ speaks here especially of the fruits the seed of the Word brings forth in hearts that become enlightened, believing, happy and wise in Christ, as St. Paul says in Romans 1:13: “That I might have some fruit in you also, even as in the rest of the Gentiles;” and Colossians 1:6: “Even as the Gospel is also in all the world bearing fruit and increasing, as it doth in you also;” that is, many will be made alive through the Gospel, delivered from their sins and be saved; for it is the characteristic work of the Gospel, as the Word of life, grace and salvation to release from sin, death and Satan. In harmony with this fruit follow the fruits of the Spirit, the good works of patience, love, faithfulness, etc.

18. Now that some seed brings forth thirty, some sixty, and some a hundred fold, means that more people will be converted in some places than in others, and one apostle and minister may preach farther and more than another; for the people are not everywhere alike numerous and do not report the same number of Christians, and one minister may not preach as many sermons or cover as great a territory as another, which God foresaw and ordained. To the words of St. Paul, who preached the farthest and the most, we may indeed ascribe the hundredfold of fruit; although he was not a virgin.

IV. WHY CHRIST CALLS THE DOCTRINE CONCERNING THE DISCIPLES AND THE FRUITS OF THE WORD A MYSTERY.

19. But what does it mean when he says: “Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of Gad”, etc.? What are the mysteries? Shall one not know them, why then are .they preached? A “mystery” is a hidden secret, that is not known: and the “mysteries of the kingdom of God” are the things in the kingdom of God, as for example Christ with all his grace, which he manifests to us, as Paul describes him; for he who knows Christ aright understands what God’s kingdom is and what is in it. And it is called a mystery because it is spiritual and secret, and indeed it remains so, where the spirit does not reveal it. For although there are many who see and hear it, yet they do not understand it. Just as there are many who preach and hear Christ, how he offered himself for us; but all that is only upon their tongue and not in their heart; for they themselves do not believe it, they do not experience it, as Paul in 1 Corinthians 2:14 says: “The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God.” Therefore Christ says here: “Unto you it is given”, the Spirit gives it to you that you not only hear and see it, but acknowledge and believe it with your heart. Therefore it is now no longer a mystery to you. But to the others who hear it as well as you, and have no faith in their heart, they see and understand it not; to them it is a mystery and it will continue unknown to them, and all that they hear is only like one hearing a parable or a dark saying. This is also proved by the fanatics of our day, who know so much to preach about Christ; but as they themselves do not experience it in their heart, they rush ahead and pass by the true foundation of the mystery and tramp around with questions and rare foundlings, and when it comes to the test they do not know the least thing about trusting in God and finding in Christ the forgiveness of their sins.

20. But Mark says, Mark 4:33, Christ spake therefore to the people with parables, that they might understand, each according to his ability.

How does that agree with what Matthew says, Matthew 13:13-14: He spake therefore unto them in parables, because they did not understand? It must surely be that Mark wishes to say that parables serve to the end that they may get a hold of coarse, rough people, although they do not indeed understand them, yet later, they may be taught and then they know: for parables are naturally pleasing to the common people, and they easily remember them since they are taken from common every day affairs, in the midst of which the people live. But Matthew means to say that these parables are of the nature that no one can understand them, they may grasp and hear them as often as they will, unless the Spirit makes them known and reveals them. Not that they should preach that we shall not understand them; but it naturally follows that wherever the Spirit does not reveal them, no one understands them. However, Christ took these words from Isaiah 6:9-10, where the high meaning of the divine foreknowledge is referred to, that God conceals and reveals to whom he will and whom he had in mind from eternity.

Another Debacle - Matt Harrison's 732 Page Luther's Large Catechism -
A Vanity Talmud for 70 or So Would-Be Authors

 "Hi there! I had an honorary doctorate, too. It never stopped me from publishing!"

What is left to say about a project gone wild? Today I received my copy of Luther's Large Catechism, a fraudulent title. The gigantic book with tiny print seems to be a showcase for everyone who might re-elect Synod President Matt Harrison.




The original Jewish Talmud was designed to add layer upon layer around the Old Testament, to build a fence around the Torah. This is not Jewish or Lutheran or anything more than a vanity publication, like those Who's Who in Academia or Cosmetics or Plumbing books one can buy for the mantle, coffee table, or Mom.

Can anyone find a coherent Large Catechism in this publication? I have a print copy of the Henry Eyster Jacob's Book of Concord, published for $16.95 by the Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry and also free at this link. The Large Catechism is 100 pages in the book, not 700 pages. Ask to get back 85% of the price. 

The Large Catechism of Luther teaches, but this monstrosity does not. Why does the LCMS need to explain Dr. Luther, a real doctor, through the limited scope of Pless and Vogel, the MDiv editors. Pless' last degree was an MDiv from Trinity (ELCA) Seminary. Vogel's PhD is coming from Concordia seminary, St. Louis, May, 2023 - "The dissertation examines membership data for The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS) from the mid-1970s to the present. It considers the analysis of LCMS decline by two scholars, George Hawley and Ryan MacPherson, who independently proposed that LCMS membership decline was internal in causation due to diminished birthrates and fewer young families." How bizarre - the dissertation analysis explains the analysis of two others. And what a captivating, sociological conclusion! 

Could the decline come from not teaching faith in Jesus Christ and clinging to the rotting remains of Fuller Seminary dogma?

That reminds me of Pless and Vogel explaining Luther and Melanchthon.












FEMA Document - Continuity of Government

 

 The FEMA document Continuity of Government is found here.



LutherQuestioning - Let the Backpeddling Begin.
The LCMS-ELCA Large Catechism Was Made Printed in China




JV Verne (Jv_verne)
Intermediate Member
Username: Jv_verne

Post Number: 422
Registered: 4-2016
Posted on Saturday, February 11, 2023 - 9:25 am:   Edit Post Delete Post Print Post

Sent to me by a colleague serving in the New England District

February 10, 2023

Dear Brother in Christ,

As I’m sure you know, Concordia Publishing House is now releasing a new edition of Luther’s Large Catechism with Annotations and Contemporary Applications. You may also know that significant opposition has arisen to it, especially on social media but also in print media. I have been told that there is even a recent article in Christianity Today about our Synod, I presume prompted by this issue, although I have not seen the article.

I have just returned from meetings with the Council of Presidents (COP) in St. Louis (2/6-9). The new Large Catechism and the response to it was discussed at length in these meetings. We were also given a copy of it. The purpose of this letter is to share with you some important things you should know, as well as my own thoughts about the new LC and all that has been going on.

First, regarding the issuing of this new edition of the Large Catechism: this was undertaken at the direction of the 2016 Synod Convention. Resolution 5-12 stated in its final resolve “That the CTCR, in concurrence with the President of Synod and the seminary faculties, explore the creation of an annotated and expanded edition of the Large Catechism.” So, the CTCR was given the main responsibility for overseeing the creation of this Catechism. (I am including, at the end of this letter, a recent statement from John Pless and Larry Vogel of the CTCR to the COP regarding this and the concerns that have been raised.) The articles from the contributors they selected went through the Synod’s doctrinal review process, and after being approved were then included. I mention this so that you might know what Pres. Harrison could, and could not, do when the recent uproar began. You probably saw his message in late January, asking CPH to pause the distribution of the LC until he could review it. This was, frankly, the most he could do. As the creation of the LC with Annotations had been authorized by the Synod in convention, had been given to the CTCR to prepare, and had passed through the doctrinal review process, he had no authority to prevent its release. He must follow our Bylaws, just like the rest of us. Of course, Pres. Harrison ultimately issued a statement on Feb. 4 in which he approved of the new LC and recommended that we purchase it and read it.

I have been doing so over the past few days since I have received it. I have been focusing on, especially, the authors and essays that have generated the most discussion. Here are my thoughts.

Some contributors – especially Steven Paulson and James Nestingen, theologians who are members of the ELCA – should not have been invited to write. I say this even though I did not find anything objectionable in their essays. Even so, I do think that, as they are members of a Church which is becoming increasingly heretical in its corruption of and outright opposition to the Word of God, they should not have been included. Now, I am not opposed to discussing the Scriptures with those with whom we disagree. I have attended many a Symposia at the Ft. Wayne Seminary at which theologians from the ELCA, as well as other Churches with whom we are not in fellowship, presented papers. A Pastoral conference can be a place for robust debate with a non-LCMS presenter. But, the Large Catechism is a confessional, and so teaching, document of our Church. In my opinion, it was a serious error in judgment for the CTCR to include theologians of a heretical Church body in this document. I, and a number of other District Presidents, expressed this clearly when the LC was discussed in our meetings, and this will be communicated to the CTCR by the DP who is our representative on the CTCR. My hope is that, if a 2nd edition of the new LC is released at some point, the essays of Paulson and Nestingen will not be included.

Another concern that has been expressed is the seeming use in the new LC of language that reflects the LGBTQ and Critical Race agendas. For instance, an essay on the Sixth Commandment by Stephen Lee entitled, The Sixth Commandment: Encouragement for Christians with Gender Dysphoria and Homosexual Attraction, says in the last paragraph, “The Christian with sexual dysphoria or the homosexual Christian is one of us, a redeemed Christian and also a sinner.” The concern that has been raised is that it is not Scriptural for a Christian to be identified as a homosexual. Paul writes in 1 Cor. 6:9-11, “Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality… will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.” Because they were baptized, what they once were is not what they are now. And, this is exactly what Lee says earlier in his essay. He writes: “Today’s culture seems focused, even obsessed, with the search for sexual identity, demanding that each person answer: “Am I gay, straight, bisexual, transgender, or something else?” But when it comes to identity, what matters most is our baptismal identity―what God says we are, not what we think we are. It is better to look to Him, not ourselves.” Lee speaks this way throughout his essay. If his essay had ended by referring not to the homosexual Christian but the Christian with homosexual desires it would have better reflected what he had said throughout. But, in my opinion it is a stretch – and an unwarranted accusation – to accuse him of adopting LGBTQ language or promoting an LGBTQ agenda. Lee does not do so in his essay.

Nor does Warren L. Malueg-Lattimore promote Critical Race Theory in his essay on the Fifth Commandment, Hatred As Murder. He has been accused of doing so in a footnote which says, “The deaths of a number of unarmed Black citizens at the hands of white individuals or police officers sparked widespread protests and turmoil in recent years and especially in 2020. Many churches sought ways to promote racial justice and healing.” Now, I myself wonder why, for instance, “Black” is capitalized and “white” is not. This strikes me as a divisive putting of one race above another, as is done by Critical Race Theory. I also seriously question other assertions in the footnote. Interestingly, I have come to find out that the author did not write this footnote. It was written and inserted by editors. My hope is that, if there is a 2nd edition of the new LC, it be deleted.

I am not opposed to serious questions being raised and discussions had regarding the new Large Catechism. Nor is Pres. Harrison. He wrote in his email of 2/2, “The Synod does allow — in fact it welcomes — the expression of concerns via the Commission on Doctrinal Review, which is then bound to follow the process outlined in Synod Bylaw 3.9.3.2.2 (p.143 in the 2019 Handbook). The Commission on Theology and Church Relations (ctcr@lcms.org) and my office (president@lcms.org) are happy to hear both your affirmations and concerns.” So, if you have questions or concerns, feel free to email me (rbeinke@ned-lcms.org) or call me, or to contact Pres. Harrison or the CTCR. What I do not want, and what I urge you to not participate in, are attacks upon the character and faith of Pres. Harrison or any others involved in the new LC. There have been many such attacks in recent days, especially via social media. Such attacks are often not only misinformed and so erroneous; they are also sinful. I am not telling you to not use social media. But, as you do so, remember: God calls us to put the best construction on everything and to defend our neighbor, even if and when he is involved in sin. This is what Christ has done for us all, thanks be to God! Luther says in the Large Catechism:
[267] People are called slanderers who are not content with knowing a thing, but go on to assume jurisdiction. When they know about a slight offense committed by another person, they carry it into every corner. They are delighted and tickled that they can stir up another’s displeasure, just as swine delight to roll themselves in the dirt and root in it with the snout. [268] This is nothing other than meddling with God’s judgment and office and pronouncing sentence and punishment with the most severe verdict…
[269] God, therefore, would have such behavior banned, that anyone should speak evil of another person even though that person is guilty…

Again, if you have any questions or concerns, please reach out to me. I also invite you to get a copy of the new Large Catechism and read through it yourself. Besides the wonderful teaching of Luther there are many excellent essays expounding upon his teaching. I thank God that I am in a Church which embraces this teaching of God’s Word and is willing to fight about it! – even if that fighting at times goes too far. May the Lord bless us as we strive to rightly and clearly proclaim His Word of salvation in Christ and to joyously live it in our lives!

In Christ,

Robert D. Beinke
President, NED

Touch Not! - Ye LutherQuestioners and ALPB Ovaltine Buddies -
The Anointed CPH-ELCA Large Catechism

My copy of the ELCA-LCMS Large Catechism, promoted by CPH, is being rushed from Communist China, where it was printed.

Apostate Lutheran discussion groups are a wobbly three-legged stool.

  1. Christian News is not read by anyone I know but helps pay for Pastor Hale-Storm's food budget.
  2. LutherQuest, still looking for Luther, hammers the most trivial items in order to pay for Cascione's paint-by-number supplies.
  3. American Lutheran Publicity Bureau's Online Discussion Forum is looking for a more concise name. I suggest "The Ovalines."
I am intrigued that LQ (sic) has dropped the LCMS-ELCA Large Catechism dust-up. Four days of silence! They stopped discussing the Harrison blundering retreat on 2-7-2023.

The Ovaltines sputtered to a stop yesterday, as if warned not to endanger Matt the Fatt's re-election.

Bishop Liz and Matt the Fatt need to ask about Mirthless Mark's food plan. Has Mark gone full Fuhrman?


LCMS and ELCA work closely together, as they have for many decades. WELS is not officially a part of this morganatic marriage, so they hide Mirthless Mark Schroeder behind a curtain when necessary.

"Morganatic marriage, sometimes called a left-handed marriage,[1] is a marriage between people of unequal social rank, which in the context of royalty or other inherited title prevents the principal's position or privileges being passed to the spouse, or any children born of the marriage. The concept is most prevalent in German-speaking territories and countries most influenced by the customs of the German-speaking realms." (Wikipedia, so it must be true.)

This was an earlier, tragic wedding between Jeske (pan-denominational, but kinda WELS) and Kieschnick, who was no more liberal than the rest of Otten's approved synod presidents. Yes, Harrison came to New Haven on his knees, to sing a song flattering Herman. Herman got Matt on a good diet to help him bulk up. 

What makes the dunderheads angry is my pinpoint accuracy on the real issues, which they run away from at high speeds. 
  • They deny they are stuck together like Velcro and lint.
  • They never deal with the main issues of Biblical doctrine, such as the Apostolic Text (KJV), the efficacy of the Word, and Justification by Faith.
  • They act like lords and scholars when they are simply groveling for an easy life of Thrivent perks and synodical buddies.