Why are there no objections about false doctrine from WELS leaders?
Did you get permission to use the wolf in sheep clothing picture? It's not your own creation, copy and paste works well for you huh? (<--English 101 needed) The site it came from also contains sexually explicit material. Thought your readers might like to know where you find your images from.
***
The picture is clearly credited, unlike the sermons of the WELS Chicaneries: Ski, Kelm, Parlow, Doebler, et al. I imagine the print was hard to see, with a beam lodged in one's eye - eh, Anonymous?
Most photos are PhotoShopped by me or by stealthy contributors. Most people accept that as a new creation. No one outside of the Shrinker movement has complained. From them I get threats of lawsuits, etc. Ho hum.
I obtained the previous photo from putting "wolf in sheep's clothing" in Google images. I have several that I use from time to time, to illustrate the crafts and assaults of Church and Change. Almost all my photos come from adding "funny" to a particular image name. That is how I found the LolCats site and the parallel dog site. They are also marked at the bottom.
This clueless Pharisee seems to know a lot about StrangeCosmos. He may do as much for that URL as the MLC did for Fire Island. But no, I never go to that site. Sorry to disappoint his prurient interests.
Many Lutheran images will now show up in Google as pointing to Ichabod. That probably drives traffic, since I also look up sites using images I want to kelm.
My BoyScout detector reads the following for his comment:
1. Former WELS school student? - Yes.
2. Expelled from NWC for excessive drinking? - Was that even possible?
3. Son of a Shrinker? - Very probable.
4. Name? - They are all pretty much the same.
