I would add, once again: What is their point of reference? What are they trying to conserve? Walther, Pieper, Preus? Certainly not Luther.
 |
| Twin 1 - UOJ Enthusiast - "He was once pure as the driven snow, but he drifted." Twin 2 - "Didn't he just publish nine volumes of Luther in one year?" |
Pastor,
I hope this statement is tongue in cheek:
David Schumacher: Whatever else Jackson may, or may not be, he is not Lutheran. I don't believe he ever was.
Yet they partake of the same feeding bowl with the ELCA? Never the less, if the above statement were true, one could safely conclude that Martin Luther and the rest of the Reformation fathers were not Lutherans either -- by their definition anyway.
This is simply a pretty stupid thing to say about someone, whose ministry includes publishing entire Luther sermons each week (so that nothing is taken out of context)....which is much more than can be said than their cafeteria Lutheranism.
Ichabod bleeds Luther. I guess you have to revere Walther or Preus to to be more Lutheran.
SDG,
Gideon
