The Objective Justification salesmen want to sell their goods various ways, which are irrelevant and immaterial:
- Synodical Conference history - They love to send people into the brambles with their version of SynCon history, minus Walther ignoring the young women Stephan was bedding while teaching Halle's Objective Justification to CFW. Yes, all the clergy knew about Stephan. So did the police.
- Ad hominem - the personal attack. In love, they hurl various insults, revealing their lack of argumentation and feeble grasp of the facts.
- Guilt by Association - For some reason, my name comes up often. I have heard that Rydecki is a pariah in WELS, which is also good. What did these lupine leaders do with Dr. Walter A. Maier, PhD, The Lutheran Hour speaker? He listed the two great doctrines as Justification by Faith and Biblical inerrancy.
The Most Direct Hit Against the Rotten Dogma of UOJ - Scriptural Exegesis
The cowardly covens of UOJ never engage in exegesis, which seems like a mysterious word but is not. Jesus is the exegesis of the Father. He explains the Father to us.
KJV John 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.
Stephanus John 1:18 θεον ουδεις εωρακεν πωποτε ο μονογενης υιος ο ων εις τον κολπον του πατρος εκεινος εξηγησατο.
Jackson Classic Version John 1:18 No one has ever seen God. The only-begotten Son, Eternally in the bosom of the Father -
That Person has exegeted εξηγησατο (explained, taught) Him.
Exegesis does not begin with dogmatic assumptions and declarations based on the author of Stephan's pimp and enforcer, later kidnapper, CFW Walther, BA.
No book judges the Bible. The Bible judges all books.
All people need to do is study the topic of Justification in the Bible, starting with Genesis 15. Why is Abraham so important in the New Testament? What is said about him each time?
At the very least, in "declaring or exegeting the Father," what did Jesus teach in the Gospel of John?
Since Romans is the summary, doctrinal letter of the New Testament, what does the Holy Spirit teach through Paul in Romans 3 - 5?
If the precious Brief Statement of 1932 so brilliant on Justification, why does it list Romans 4:25 as support for Objective Justification?
How does Romans 5:1-2 serve to summarize Romans 4, the chapter which is the alleged source of Objective Justification?
 |
| Norma A. Boeckler |
 |
| Norma A. Boeckler |
