Thursday, January 29, 2009

Case Against WELS High School in California Thrown Out by Appeaals Court



Some very funny cartoons and photos were rejected in favor of this one.


Court Rejects Suit Over School’s Expulsion of Alleged Lesbians

By STEVEN M. ELLIS, Staff Writer

Two students expelled from a private Lutheran high school in Riverside County over an alleged lesbian relationship cannot sue for invasion of privacy or discrimination under the Unruh Civil Rights Act, the Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled yesterday.

Concluding that the school—like the Boy Scouts of America—is not a “business enterprise” subject to the act, Div. Two upheld a judgment against the students, whose relationship was exposed by another student’s tip about postings on social networking website MySpace.com.

The board of directors of the 142-student California Lutheran High School in Wildomar voted to expel the two girls in 2005 after Principal Gregory Bork determined they shared what he called in a letter to the girls’ parents, “a bond of intimacy…characteristic of a lesbian relationship” in violation of the school’s “Christian Conduct” rule.

Affiliated with the Evangelical Lutheran Synod and the Wisconsin Lutheran Synod, which view homosexuality as a sin, the school has a policy of refusing admission to homosexual students, and its conduct rule warned students of possible expulsion for immoral or scandalous conduct on or off campus.

The girls claimed they were subjected to an intrusive interrogation by Bork without their parents’ knowledge or consent, and they also brought claims for public disclosure of private facts, violation of their state constitutional right to privacy, and false imprisonment. They also asserted the school was a business operator subject to the Unruh Act because it collected fees and accepted students without regard to religious affiliation.

After the California Supreme Court declined to intervene upon the Court of Appeal’s denial of the school’s writ petition to scuttle the lawsuit in 2006, the case returned to Riverside Superior Court Judge Gloria Trask, who ruled the school was not a business and granted summary judgment.

On appeal, Justice Betty Ann Richli—emphasizing that the Court of Appeal’s opinion was based on statutory interpretation, not the justices’ views on the policy’s wisdom or morality—agreed, pointing to the California Supreme Court’s determination in Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts (1998) 17 Cal.4th 670 that the Boy Scouts were not a business establishment under the Unruh Act.

Noting further that the California Attorney General opined in 1998 that, under Curran, the admission decisions of a private religious school are not subject to the act, Richli rejected the students’ claims to the extent they were based on the Unruh Act.

The justice wrote, however, that the court’s opinion did not address the school’s argument that the Unruh Act would violate its right to freedom of expressive association, as well as the right to control the education of one’s child, if construed to prohibit it from discriminating based on sex or sexual orientation.

Presiding Justice Manuel A. Ramirez and Justice Douglas P. Miller joined Richli in her opinion.

Attorneys Christopher J. Nelson, and Michael J. Grace of the San Diego firm of Grace Hollis & Hanson LLP represented the plaintiffs, while attorneys John P. McKay and Michael P. Acain of the Los Angeles firm of McKay, Graham & de Lorimier represented the defendants.

The case is Doe v. California Lutheran High School Association, E044811.

---

Anonymouse has left a new comment on your post "Case Against WELS High School in California Thrown...":

What is the point of posting this?

***

GJ - The story is WELS news, from a newspaper. FIC should report it as well.

ELCA was successfully sued for $40 million for letting a homosexual predator become ordained and prey upon youth. They reported the news through their own news service.

My work would be reduced if people handled their own jobs better.

Besides, I am a baby journalist with 20+ hours earned so far in J-school. Bow down.

---

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Case Against WELS High School in California Thrown...":

I believe the question, "What is the point of posting this?", was to Mr. Meyer's post regarding Thrivent. I must admit that I don't understand the point either.

To the issue of WELS reporting this, the press release copied below was on the front page of the synod web site before Greg posted his story. (www.wels.net)

For immediate release
January 29, 2009

Contact:
Mr. Joel Hochmuth
Director of Communications
Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
414-256-3230
joel.hochmuth@sab.wels.net

WELS president reacts to ruling in favor of California Lutheran High School

Rev. Mark Schroeder, president of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, is reacting to an appellate court decision in favor of California Lutheran High School in Wildomar, Calif., in an anti-discrimination lawsuit.

In 2005, the school expelled two students for engaging in conduct characteristic of a lesbian relationship, in violation of the school's Christian Code of Conduct. The parents of the two girls sued, claiming discrimination based on sexual orientation.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal in San Bernardino ruled Monday that California Lutheran High School—operated by an association of WELS and Evangelical Lutheran Synod (ELS) congregations—is a social organization entitled to follow its own principles, not a business subject to state anti-discrimination laws. The ruling upholds a 2008 lower court ruling.

"Our prayers continue to be with California Lutheran High School as it defends our right to practice our faith and follow our beliefs," says Schroeder."WELS has clearly stated that we hold to the biblical teaching that homosexual practices are wrong and not in keeping with God's Word. We have taken that position in love—both for God's Word and God's truth, as well as for those who have fallen into the sin of homosexuality."

"While some in our society would view this stand as bigoted and unloving, we maintain that our beliefs are drawn from the teachings of the Bible," he says. "We also maintain that our goal is not merely to condemn sinful behavior, but to reach out to all sinners with God's call to repentance and his assurance of forgiveness in Christ."

***

GJ - I know Thrivent, when it was AAL, sponsored a pro-homosexual workshop in Columbus, Ohio, already in the 1980s. For more information, read Richard Starr's Speaking the Unspeakable, or as one wit renamed it: Thpeaking the Untwpeakable. Maybe that was the point.

---

Anonymouse has left a new comment on your post "Case Against WELS High School in California Thrown...":

I guess WELS can't do anything right, huh Greg? Now they are not reacting fast enough. Like they don't have better things to do and satisfy Greg Jackson's impatience too. You must be ADHD.

I still don't get why the article got posted in the first place. A court rules in WELS favor for taking a Biblical stand and this is bad in some way? You remind me of the joker in The Dark Knight. He didn't take anyone's side either.

***

GJ - The Force not strong with this one is.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Who?



"Run, Kudu Don. This zebra is fighting back!"



Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WELS VP Calls Me a Fool and a Liar":

So who made you the conscience of the WELS? And while we're at it, who's your conscience?

***

GJ - VP Don Patterson's network continues to fire spitwads in my direction. If the WELS laity and pastors did their jobs, I would be confined to publishing cute kitty photos from Lolcats.

Joe Krohn needs to fess up on his blog about being pals with Patterson - yet another link in the odious Church and Chicanery network (stealth division).

Another Satisfied Reader


Rev. Kent A. Heimbigner, Ph.D. has left a new comment on your post "Baptist Theologian Takes Congregation Out of LCMS:...":

Hi Greg:

Thank you for your interest in what my good and faithful congregation has done. I have met you, and certainly appreciate your sense of humor, but for the sake of those who may not understand it, I offer a couple of points of clarification:

1) There is no such thing as "Baylor Baptist University." There is only "Baylor University," which has a Baptist history, but is not affiliated with any Baptist denomination.

2) I am not a "Baptist theologian," nor am I going to join the Eastern Orthodox. I am getting a chuckle out of putting those together and imagining what it would be like to be an Easternizing Baptist. I guess they are both synergists, but I'm not. I will remain Lutheran. At ordination, I swore an oath. It matters to me. And my beloved congregation is on that same "we've got to stay Lutheran" page with me.

BTW, for my response to Fr. Fenton heading east, check out my blog on the website, http://www.confessionallutheran.org/content/view/142/91/

Todd, thanks for your clarifying posts. Greg, it's been too long, and I hope our paths cross again in due course. Peace be with you both.

***

GJ - Actually, Kent, you asked to stay here for the LCMS conference and didn't show up or explain.

I see you share Todd Wilken's sense of humor. Or, as Bruce Church suggested, "What's the point?"

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

WELS VP Calls Me a Fool and a Liar



Gunga Don Patterson, Stealth Church and Chicanery leader, with Robert Timmerman. The zebra is playing possum in hopes of getting away.


Hey, Greg,

I am not a part of Church and Change Leadership. I went to one conference a few years ago and had my own reservations. Also, Robert Timmerman does not serve as a church council pres at our church. You are lying on your blog.

Don
Donald Patterson
kududon@gmail.com
12-10-08
subject: Don't be a fool

sent to BethanyLutheranWorship@gmail.com

***

GJ - I don't look at my gmail very often, as readers can see. Someone could have created a gmail account and sent this. In fact, one of his cronies could have. I looked up "kudu" and found this site. So I think Kudu Don Patterson sent the email.




The African kudu.


This email does remind me of typical WELS evasion tactics -avoid the main point and call someone a liar on a trivial, debatable matter.

Does VP Patterson soak up synod money by asking for grants to pay for his vicars? Yes.

Does VP Patterson support Rock and Roll Church? Yes.

Did VP Patterson take Chad White (on his parish staff) and others to the Exponential Conference? Yes.

Did Stelljes, son of a member of Holy Word, also attend that pan-denominational conference? Yes.

Did other WELS workers attend that conference? Yes.

Was Brother Stetzer a featured speaker at Exponential? Yes.

Was Babtist Stetzer hired to speak to Church and Change's 2009 conference soon after? Yes.

Did Church and Change start lying about Stetzer? Yes - so much that one of my sources got rattled about whether it was true or not. I posted three separate proofs that Stetzer was hired in August - all from Stetzer himself. It was up to Church and Change to prove otherwise. SP Schroeder said Stetzer is an issue, so who is lying?

Is Timmerman a leader at Patterson's church? Yes. Timmerman is also on the WELS governing board. (I am not the parish or synodical secretary, so terms of office are not in my job description.) If Patterson wants to pretend Timmerman is not involved in Church and Change, as he also pretends - many know otherwise. Does he want to suggest Timmerman, who must bankroll the African safaris, is not a parish leader?

So, is Patterson a stealth leader of Church and Change?



  • He galloped after Stetzer, even to the point of organizing a pilgrimage of Patterson parrots to Exponential.
  • He was a study leader at a Church and Change conference, which means they thoroughly vetted him for his Church Growth doctrinal standards (that is: anti-Lutheran to the core).
  • His odious network is definitely on the side of Church and Change, defiantly so.

    ---

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WELS VP Calls Me a Fool and a Liar":

    Good for Patterson. You lie and tell half-truths all the time, mostly to make yourself look good.

    [GJ - Confidential to Joe - I don't think you should post anonymously when Patteson arranges for Rock and Roll to have more grant money. Conflict of interest and all that. Does it bother you that he took a crew to hear Brother Stetzer and a bunch of false teachers at Exponential?]

    ***

    GJ - What was your name? I didn't catch it.

    ---

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WELS VP Calls Me a Fool and a Liar":

    Ignore Don's jackals.



    ---

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WELS VP Calls Me a Fool and a Liar":

    I'm glad that you can make such sweeping inferences about someone, especially when some of your bellowing is patently false... although that matters not to you. Well guess what Greg? Because of your half-truths, your carelessness and your downright vile-ness, most of us care little about you except to pray for your soul. That is the Christian thing to do, No, wait, I'm sure that is way too pietistic for you because it would mean to show concern for someone. Well, we'll keep praying for you (and all the others you are fomenting hatred within) and you enjoy your little self-serve perish (that wasn't a typo).

    ***

    GJ - Don's jackals care so little that they stop by every day to bite and chew. Too bad they are toothless. I would be bitter and angry too - if I spent my career promoting Babtist theology...if I ended ended up with a non-pastor (Ed Stetzer) as guest speaker, a hot-air merchant so pathetic he has to claim "two doctorates" (false) and "two master's degrees" (so what) on every bio.

    Church and Chicanery is losing ground. All they have to offer is a pack of lies. The trouble with the first set of deceptions is that they need another set to cover for them.

    MARK YOUR CALENDARS

    Conference 09
    Nov 5th - 7th
    Wyndham Milwaukee Airport Hotel and Convention Center

    C&C events are a great place to network with people who have similar ministries, situations and problems. Come, learn and benefit from everyone's experience!


    More information is coming soon!




  • For months they have claimed - More information is coming soon. They need to wake up the webmaster or tell the truth about Stetzer.

    Joe Krohn, one of their ovine followers, could not get the truth from them on their own list-serve.

    ---

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "WELS VP Calls Me a Fool and a Liar":

    When did he call you a fool?

    ***

    GJ - When? The subject line of the email. I am not offended, but pleased. The feathers fly when the arrow reaches the mark. VP Patterson's behavior is typical of WELS Church Growth leaders. They do not repent and apologize - they accuse and slander and deceive. That is why I call the headquarters buildings The Love Shack - since most of the drones there talk love, and conversion via love, but exhibit nothing but spite and hated.

    Monday, January 26, 2009

    Brewer To Run Arid-zona



    Jan Brewer, LCMS, New Governor of Arizona


    The former governor of Arizona, Janet Napolitano, was unmarried, had a deep voice, and was described as "very happy, if you know what I mean. She is never seen with a man." Napolitano was an open-borders, pro-abortion, dictatorial spendthrift. The state will run out of money in February, in spite of a booming economy during the Napolitano captivity. She even refused to start dealing with the crisis as she escaped to DC, where she will be in charge of Homeland Security. She may sell more guns than Obamessiah, just by being appointed.

    The new Governor Janet worships down the street from the Ichabod Global Headquarters. I can walk past one LCMS congregation to get to hers, which is a fairly new mission.

    I hope common sense will prevail in Brewer's administration.

    The Arizona Republic cheered every move of Napolitano. The Republic, once owned in part by Dan Quayle's family, is also broke.

    I was going to headline this post: "Missouri Woman To Head Arizona," but I anticipated a string of comments from Todd Wilken - "I don't get the humor."

    Perhaps the Brewer headline will make people think of Cindy McCain, who runs one of the biggest alcohol distribution businesses anywhere.

    ---

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Brewer To Run Arid-zona":

    If she was WELS, she would be busy at home.

    ***

    GJ - If she were WELS, she would be leading the worship service (St. Andrew's Latte), or the adult Bible study (St. Paul, German Village, 15 years ago) or giving the children's sermon (St. Mark, Depere) or writing lead editorials for the synod magazine (Dorothy Sonntag, 15 years ago).

    You Have Mail!



    "I'm sure you can find a way to blame it all on Church and Change.... Be sure to include some more cute kitty pictures!!"

    Sunday, January 25, 2009

    Peter Schiff Was Right - 2006 and 2007 - The Experts Laughed at Him




    Ben Stein, Columbia and Yale: "The credit crunch is way overblown. The sub-prime is a tiny problem. It's a buying opportunity, especially the financials...Sub-prime is tiny. You are wrong about that."

    Wall Street Journal:

    Jan. 26, 2009

    Lending at many of the nation's largest banks fell in recent months, even after they received $148 billion in taxpayer capital that was intended to help the economy by making loans more readily available.

    Ten of the 13 big beneficiaries of the Treasury Department's Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, saw their outstanding loan balances decline by a total of about $46 billion, or 1.4%, between the third and fourth quarters of 2008, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of banks that recently announced their quarterly results.

    Rules, Rules




    http://www.livingbold.net/nf/uploads/Image/Conduct%20Covenant%20-%20Leader.pdf

    In the spirit of Ephesians chapter 5, recognizing that I am to be an “imitator of God,” seeking to model Christ for those I am privileged to supervise and serve at this event, and understanding that my congregation and my group members’ parents have legally entrusted their youth to me (in loco parentis), I promise, with the help of the Holy Spirit, to . . .

    • Personally participate along with my youth group members in all the spiritual growth presentations.

    • Cooperate with rally officials and assist in whatever ways asked to help make the rally a success.

    • Ensure that my group’s youth are attending the required spiritual growth presentations and breakout discussions and contributing in a positive manner to them.

    • Ensure that my group’s youth are accountable and participating positively in all recreational and social activities planned.

    Ensure that my group’s youth are adhering to any and all rules, regulations, and requirements, i.e., wear required name tags, respect rally site property, follow curfews, not use controlled substances, no guys in girls’ rooms and no girls in guys’ rooms, remain on premises unless allowed otherwise, etc.

    • Remain onsite and responsible for my group’s youth at all times unless rally schedule or circumstances require otherwise.

    • Be physically present and remain in the lodging buildings when my group’s youth are required to be in them for the night.

    • Refrain from personal consumption of alcohol.

    I further acknowledge that my failure to abide by the above could adversely affect my youth group’s participation in future rallies.

    I guess WELS has had problems with this type of behavior in the past, at least this is my pastor’s wife told me.

    ***

    GJ - I went to all youth activities. At a regional youth rally, the pastors patrolled the dorms all night and behavior was excellent.

    At the Columbus Youth Rally--run by Kuske's divorced Church Growth pastors--behavior was totally unsupervised and horrible. One teen did $800 damage to a taxi (bottle thrown from upper storey). No one fessed up. I guess they were already forgiven.

    OSU officials said the WELS rally was the "worst ever" in youth conduct.

    I think the pledge above is just plain silly. Adult attitudes are clearly communicated without a lot of verbiage. I believe in conveying an attitude that all unwelcome actions will have immediate and unpleasant consequences.

    On a lighter note, when Pioneers acted up, I made them salute and say, "Sir, yes sir!" One boy was funny with his missing front teeth. He said, "Thur, yeth thur!" and saluted smartly.

    On a trip in town, a police officer asked my van full of kids what we were doing. He was just checking everything out, so he was satisfied. He turned away so I told the boys, "He must have been in the military. Let's all do sir, yes sir." We opened the windows and shouted, "Sir, yes sir!" and saluted. He grinned and laughed.

    Pastor of St. Paul German Village (Columbus, Ohio) Resigns



    "Aww. Not the Eighth Commandment again."
    The actor pictured above just died.


    Kevin Cortez, pastor of St. Paul (WELS) in German Village, Columbus, Ohio, has resigned.

    Kevin Cortez Bio.


    ***


    GJ - The announcement was - "for cause" - with no details added. Of course, communicating the announcement was a good excuse for someone to violate the Eight Commandment by citing the Eighth Commandment.


    Someone wrote, anonymously of course - "How very sad that so often on this blog the worst is assumed. Sorry for you scandal-lovers, but there is none here."


    The worst is often hidden away. This blog only reports some of the stuff that floats to the top.


    A pastor resigned in Columbus. I know nothing more than that.



    ---

    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Pastor of St. Paul German Village (Columbus, Ohio)...":

    To Pastor Cortez if you read this, May your God bless you in whatever you do and wherever you go. I'm sure you had your own reasons for doing what you did and I hope you can find peace with yourself and God.

    Comments like the above, though unintentional, tend to make things even worse.

    "you had your own reasons for doing whatever you did"

    Because no charges are explicitely (sic) made, people can imagine all kind of things...

    Did he change the worship format?
    Did he ask for too much money?
    Did he through (sic) little puppies into heavy traffic?

    The secrecy breeds even more wild rumors...

    Now, if it was (sic) a layman, we could publish the information...

    ***

    GJ - I would ask how much Floyd Luther Stolzenburg is in contact with members of St. Paul. After Kuske and Schuman wrote letters of recommendation for Floyd to be hired at Emmanuel, a sister church (former ALC, independent) nearby, Floyd was known for showing up at St. Paul's in his Roman collar.

    Newly divorced, Floyd blew into Columbus, after being forced out of the LCMS ministry for cause, landing at St. Paul, German Village. He taught Church Growth at St. Paul. Paul Kuske set up LPR just for Floyd, a five year plan to make Stolzenburg a WELS pastor while he pretended to be a pastor anyway. Floyd came to all the WELS pastoral meetings and acted as if he were in charge. His finest moment came when he told the late Keith Roehl to start a gay ministry at St. Paul.

    When LPR finally fell apart, Floyd got his gig at Emmanuel and WELS got Schuman to be assistant at St. Paul's. Wally Oelhafen was more excited about Schuman than a girl from convent school on her first date. Why? Schuman was crazy for Church Growth, hotter than Georgia asphalt for all things Fuller. Pastor Roehl died and Mike Nitz became the junior pastor. Soon Schuman had St. Paul polarized around the issue of whether he was Satan Incarnate or God Incarnate. When Schuman resigned over doctrinal issues, his acolytes preserved his office, intacta, as a shrine for when he came back. Instead he became a Thrivent agent and then vanished (from Google, at least).

    Kuske and Company argued that I caused all the trouble in Columbus. True, I criticized the Church Growth Movement and emphasized the Means of Grace. I also thought a pastor should be "the husband of one wife." The Columbus group was 50-50. I did not think adulterers belonged in the pastoral office, but that also made me a legalist, a trouble-maker. I questioned Mike Nitz having a woman teaching men, which was a sin (for me to ask).

    Floyd would not have been an issue if WELS had shown some spine and said, "You had your chance at marriage and ordination, and you threw both away." But no, they coddled him, financed him, and promoted him as a teacher of the Word. The Michigan District officially promoted him for WELS colloquy - the candidate's name offered up by DP Mueller at a COP meeting. This happened either once or twice. Floyd was divorced for cause, not a member of WELS, and clearly a false teacher. Yet Mueller and Kuske could not live without him. WELS apologists kept saying - "Money is the reason. Floyd is friends with the Donor."

    Stolzenburg is prime evidence of the doctrinal rot caused by the Fuller and Willow Creek gang in WELS.

    St. Paul's members are victims of that rot. They should have pelted him with vegetables on their own, but they mistakenly trusted in the synodical leaders. It is better to trust in the Word.

    Saturday, January 24, 2009

    The Third Sunday after Epiphany



    Cover for Liberalism, by Norma Boeckler



    The Third Sunday after the Epiphany

    Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

    http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

    Bethany Lutheran Worship, 8 AM Phoenix Time

    The Hymn #339 Coronations
    The Confession of Sins
    The Absolution
    The Introit p. 16
    The Gloria Patri
    The Kyrie p. 17
    The Gloria in Excelsis
    The Salutation and Collect p. 19
    The Epistle and Gradual Romans 12:16-21
    The Gospel Matthew 8:1-13
    Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
    Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
    The Nicene Creed p. 22
    The Sermon Hymn #423 Hyfrydal

    The Effective Word

    The Hymn #341 Diademata
    The Preface p. 24
    The Sanctus p. 26
    The Lord's Prayer p. 27
    The Words of Institution
    The Agnus Dei p. 28
    The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
    The Benediction p. 31
    The Hymn #401 Freu dich sehr

    KJV Romans 12:16 Be of the same mind one toward another. Mind not high things, but condescend to men of low estate. Be not wise in your own conceits. 17 Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. 18 If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men. 19 Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. 20 Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. 21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.

    KJV Matthew 8:1 When he was come down from the mountain, great multitudes followed him. 2 And, behold, there came a leper and worshipped him, saying, Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean. 3 And Jesus put forth his hand, and touched him, saying, I will; be thou clean. And immediately his leprosy was cleansed. 4 And Jesus saith unto him, See thou tell no man; but go thy way, shew thyself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them. 5 And when Jesus was entered into Capernaum, there came unto him a centurion, beseeching him, 6 And saying, Lord, my servant lieth at home sick of the palsy, grievously tormented. 7 And Jesus saith unto him, I will come and heal him. 8 The centurion answered and said, Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof: but speak the word only, and my servant shall be healed. 9 For I am a man under authority, having soldiers under me: and I say to this man, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it. 10 When Jesus heard it, he marvelled, and said to them that followed, Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel. 11 And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. 12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 13 And Jesus said unto the centurion, Go thy way; and as thou hast believed, so be it done unto thee. And his servant was healed in the selfsame hour.

    Third Sunday After Epiphany
    O almighty and everlasting God, mercifully look upon our infirmities, and in all dangers and necessities stretch forth Thy mighty hand, to defend us against our enemies; through Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

    The Effective Word

    This Gospel lesson gives us two healings, and we should remind ourselves of a basic lesson in all these healings. No matter how Jesus responded at the moment He was asked, He always answered the prayers of the petitioners. All were healed. This alone is reason to take our troubles to Him.

    The second healing is especially worthwhile to note at this time. The most basic doctrine of the Bible is under attack by Lutherans who were trained by false teachers at heretical institutions.

    The basic doctrine is the efficacy or effectiveness of the Word.

    Sad to say, the Lutherans of the last 100 years or so have built upon a weak foundation – their own. They have largely neglected or attacked this basic doctrine. For example, when I decided to study the efficacy of the Word for Thy Strong Word, I found almost no scholarly literature at all. In contrast, I found hundreds of Luther quotations where he made it absolutely clear that God’s Word alone is effective – nothing else. The same message is emphasized throughout the Book of Concord and elsewhere among the great Lutheran theologians.

    There are 19th century Lutherans who taught the same, but the 20th century saw a growing embarrassment over God working through His Word alone. Perhaps the growth of evolution and shame about Creation generated this apathy or neglect.

    The Old Testament makes it clear that God works through His Word. I ended up studying Hebrew and Judaism more than most, and I know this concept has carried through to this day. Whatever God commands happens. That is even applied to rabbis. For example, when a rabbi said, “He must be dead,” his son-in-law fell over and died. That story was told to illustrate the power of the rabbinic Word. Once spoken, it must be true.

    The story of Creation in Genesis 1 is one of the Word creating. Clearly, if the power of the Word is removed through evolution, all perspectives are changed. That is why all the miracles were explained away with rationalism. If man cannot do something, then God cannot. Soon God is out of the picture altogether and man is the measure of all things.

    There is no difference between the Old Testament and New Testament views. The more someone is an authentic Jews, the more he realizes that the New Testament is a continuation of the Old. There is no gap or contrast because the New Testament takes the Old as the authority, the very Word of God.

    When the liturgical service is ending, the Trinitarian Aaronic blessing is used.

    KJV Numbers 6:24
    The LORD bless thee, and keep thee:
    25 The LORD make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee:
    26 The LORD lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace.

    That is God speaking, even when an ordinary person is saying those words. God is actually blessing each believer as the Lord God Father and Creator, the Lord God Jesus Christ, the Lord God Holy Spirit, the unity of the Three, the three-ness of the One.

    I often mention Isaiah 55:8-11 as a key passage about the Word. That passage shows how the Word’s effect is just as inevitable as the effect of rain and snow.

    Paul addresses the same issue in Romans 10

    We preach the Word of faith –
    KJV Romans 10:8 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach; 9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

    The Apostle made it very clear, first of all, that salvation itself is simple and clear. (Remaining in the Faith is very tough.)

    Then he explained in reverse how the Word works:

    KJV Romans 10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. 14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? 15 And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things! 16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report? [GJ - report could be translated as preaching, meaning the hearing of our preaching]

    Unless Paul was hiding pop music, marketing methods, Seeker Services, Friendship Sundays, grinning greeters, and how-to messages [no sermons!] from this formula, the Apostle was relying upon the Word alone to bring salvation to all those who heard and believed.

    To teach Biblical theology correctly, it is necessary to say the Word of God alone, because all the sects yak about the Word, but they have their little additions, such as the Word and obedience, the Word and sanctification, the Word and witnessing, the Word and marketing.

    In the same way, we often need to say the Means of Grace alone, to speak about how God’s grace comes to us. The false teachers speak about grace, but apart from the divinely appointed instruments of grace (the Word and the visible Word of the Sacraments). The Reformed generally make prayer the only way in which God’s grace comes to people, confusing people in the worst possible way. Prayer is the fruit of faith, not the cause of salvation.

    Once again I received a message, anonymously, from someone who insisted that God declared the entire world forgiven, quoting this passage:

    KJV Romans 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. [judgment came, the free gift came – both phrases are added to the original text]

    That seems convincing on surface, like many other tricks of these people. They insist this means every single person received grace without the Word, without the Means of Grace, without faith.

    But what about Romans 5:19?

    KJV Romans 5:19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

    The many are not all, and there is no possible way to turn “the many” into “God declared the world righteous.”

    In fact, as Lenski shows with great clarity, verse 17 states exactly how this happens:

    KJV Romans 5:17 For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

    Those who receive the abundance of grace will reign with Christ. The repeated use of one is to show that by one (Adam) all inherited sin and death, so also by One (Christ) will grace come to all who believe.

    This is consistent with the message of Romans 10 that preaching the Word creates faith, that faith in Christ brings forgiveness and salvation.

    The marketing salesmen keep saying, “Don’t you want to know how all this works?” – as if it has never been revealed by the Holy Spirit. These windbags offer every single thing except that which really does work – the Word of God in its truth and purity.

    The word for effective or efficacious in the New Testament is the root for our word energy. And energy simple means – works in. Or, to use the lingo of Fuller Seminary – the Word alone works.

    Centurion’s Servant
    The miracle of the centurion’s servant shows us that a Roman soldier understood and believed in the power of the Word. That is, someone does not have to be an Old Testament Jew to understand.

    The soldier asked Jesus to cure his servant, who was still at home. The officer knew all about commands. He had the power to order a decimation, where the other soldiers killed 1 out of 10 soldiers. That was used to enforce discipline. If he commanded it, the soldiers obeyed.

    Rome tested bridges by having the engineer stand under it while loads were brought across it. That reduced the number of incompetent engineers and increased the motivation of the builders.

    No one sued Rome or said, “That’s not fair.” Orders were orders and obeyed.

    So when Jesus offered to visit the centurion’s place, the officer said it was not necessary.

    Matthew 8:8 The centurion answered and said, Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof: but speak the word only, and my servant shall be healed. 9 For I am a man under authority, having soldiers under me: and I say to this man, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it.

    Jesus marveled at the man’s faith, but He also warned that many would come into the Kingdom of God from outside of Judaism, while the heirs of Abraham would face eternal torment.

    He encouraged the centurion by saying the servant would be healed just as the officer believed. So the Word of Christ took effect from a distance – no surprise to children. As they say, “He is God. He can do anything.”

    How do we apply this?

    We are so surrounded by how-to books that it is no surprise that we think everything is up to us.

    How can God, so far away, take care of our problems? We have to compromise here, finagle there, do whatever it takes.

    I find it amazing that few seem to realize that the Church grew the most when under persecution and the least when fat and spoiled.

    When the Christian faith was hounded, banned, and driven from place to place, the Gospel spread across the earth. Now, with all the money from the wealthiest nation in history, the Gospel is shrinking in the face of Buddhism, Hinduism, and materialism. In many cases, the guardians of the Gospel have traded the Faith for anti-Christianity: spirit guides taught (the occult), Christian Buddhism (impossible), Yoga taught (the basis for all Hinduism), and Feng Shui taken seriously (magic, but really dumb magic at that).

    Is it possible to rely on the Word alone and accept what God brings with His Word? Or must we rely on a little of God’s Word with a lot of man’s superior reasoning powers?

    As Professor Deutschlander shows so brilliantly in his new book, The Theology of the Cross, the Gospel without the cross is not the Gospel at all.

    Those who reject the cross as part of the Christian faith, subsequent to faith, are rejecting the Christian faith altogether. The two cannot be separated. That is why Luther often used the term “the dear cross.” Chytraeus, an editor of the Book of Concord, taught that a mark of orthodoxy was “opposition.”

    So when leaders tell a pastor, “Make everyone happy. Avoid conflict,” they are saying “Remove the cross from the Gospel, the Gospel from the church.”

    Just a little listening will show how the religious leaders teach the institution, not the Gospel. That is why they fell for marketing and management. If the object of worship is material, then material means are needed. If the object of worship is Christ, then people concern themselves with the Means of Grace alone.

    Most congregations would be better off if they got rid of all their activities and just offered worship, education, and pastoral visitation.

    The Bible does not teach against the basic elements of common sense. The Book of Proverbs is full of practical knowledge. But the Word elevates God’s role and blesses man with the knowledge and hope of God’s mercy.

    God may delay His answer for a long time. He may seem to have forgotten. My cousin was married 25 years before he had his first child. He said, “We wanted to see if our marriage worked out first.” He must have felt like Abraham at that point.

    God always listens and answers according to His wisdom. We can rest easy at night because the troubles we trust to Him are answered in the morning. Gerhardt’s beautiful hymn says it so well. My translation is literal and not poetic; the German is clear, simple, and powerful:

    2. Der unser Leben, das er uns gegeben,
    in dieser Nacht so väterlich bedecket /
    und aus dem Schlaf uns fröhlich auferwecket:
    Lobet den Herren!

    He who our life has given,
    in this night has covered us so fatherly
    and wakes us joyfully from sleep,
    All praise the Lord.

    --

    Efficacy Quotations

    "The Word of God is efficacious not only when it is being read from the Bible, but also when it is being spoken or preached, and when it is recalled by memory. The Word of God, properly speaking, is really not the letters which we see or the sound which we hear, but the divine thoughts, the truths designated by these signs."
    E. Hove, Christian Doctrine, Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1930, p. 27.

    "'When the Word is read at home it is not as fruitful or as forcible as in public preaching and through the mouth of the preacher whom God has called for this purpose.' (Luther, Erlangen edition, 3:401)."
    Henry Eyster Jacobs, A Summary of the Christian Faith, Philadelphia: General Council Publication House, 1913, p. 290.

    "The efficacy of the Word, unlike that of the seed, always has a result. The man to whom the Word of God comes, and who repels it, is not as he was before. Where long and persistently refused, hardening at last comes, Exodus 8:15; 9:12; John 12:40; Hebrews 4:1, and the Word becomes a 'savor of death unto death,' 2 Corinthians 2:16. Every word heard or read, every privilege and opportunity enjoyed, leaves its impress either for good or for evil. It is not so properly the Word, as man's abuse of the Word; not so much the efficacy of the Word, as the sin taking occasion of the efficacy that produces this result, Romans 7:8."
    Henry Eyster Jacobs, Elements of Religion, Philadelphia, Board of Publication, General Council 1919 p. 155. Exodus 8:15; 9:12; John 12:40; Hebrews 4:1; 2 Corinthians 2:16; Romans 7:8

    "Since the Word of God is this weapon [sword], it behooves us to make use of it at all times and to this end become acquainted with it both by means of public preaching and by earnest Bible study at home. Cursory reading must be supplemented by careful memorizing of proof-texts and strong passages. Only in this way shall we be able to make the proper use of the Word of God as a true weapon of offense at all times."
    Paul E. Kretzmann, Popular Commentary of the New Testament, 2 vols., St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, II, p. 292. Ephesians 6:17

    "God has chosen despised and frail human beings for the ministry of the Word that the divine power of the Word might become apparent—
    a power impossible to suppress even in the weakest of persons. Moreover, if the mighty of the world were to preach the Gospel, people would be captivated more by the authority of the person preaching than by the Word itself."
    What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed. Ewald M. Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House 1959 III, p. 1118 W 25, 255; SL 6, 484; brief comments in 1532-34 #3571; Isaiah 40:10

    "Quenstedt (I, 170): 'Whether the Word be read or not, whether it be heard and believed or not, yet the efficacy of its spiritual effects is always intrinsically inherent in it by the divine arrangement and communication, nor does this divine efficacy only come to it when it is used. For the Word of God, as such, cannot even be conceived of apart from the divine virtue and gracious working of the Holy Spirit, because this is inseparable from the Word of God.'"
    Heinrich Schmid, Doctrinal Theology of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, trans., Charles A. Hay and Henry E. Jacobs, Philadelphia: United Lutheran Publication House, 1899, p. 506.

    "Hollazius (993) uses the following figures: 'It possesses and retains its internal power and efficacy even when not used, just as the illuminating power of the sun continues, although, when the shadow of the moon intervenes, no person may see it; and just as an internal efficacy belongs to the seed, although it may not be sown in the field.'"
    Heinrich Schmid, Doctrinal Theology of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, trans., Charles A. Hay and Henry E. Jacobs, Philadelphia: United Lutheran Publication House, 1899, p. 506.

    "Only little weight is attached to the ministry of the Word, to worship services, the Sacraments, to confession and absolution, and to the observance of Christian customs; a thoroughly regenerated person does not need these crutches at all. Pietism stressed the personal element over against the institutional; voluntariness versus compulsion; the present versus tradition, and the rights of the laity over against the pastors."
    Martin Schmidt, "Pietism," The Encyclopedia of the Lutheran Church, 3 vols., ed. Julius Bodensieck, Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1965, III, p. 1899.

    "But if ordination be understood as applying to the ministry of the Word, we are not unwilling to call ordination a sacrament. For the ministry of the Word has God's command and glorious promises. Romans 1:16 The Gospel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth. Likewise, Isaiah 55:11: So shall My Word be that goeth forth out of My mouth; it shall not return unto Me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please...And it is of advantage, so far as can be done, to adorn the ministry of the Word with every kind of praise against fanatical men, who dream that the Holy Ghost is given not through the Word, but because of certain preparations of their own...."
    Apology Augsburg Confession, XIII. #11. Number/Use Sacraments Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 311. Tappert, p. 212. Heiser, p. 95. Romans 1:16; Isaiah 55:11.

    "And it is of advantage, so far as can be done, to adorn the ministry of the Word with every kind of praise against fanatical men, who dream that the Holy Ghost is given not through the Word, but because of certain preparations of their own, if they sit unoccupied and silent in obscure places, waiting for illumination, as the Enthusiasts formerly taught, and the Anabaptists now teach."
    Apology Augsburg Confession, XIII. #13. The Sacraments. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 311. Tappert, p. 213. Heiser, p. 95.

    "This power {the Keys} is exercised only by teaching or preaching the Gospel and administering the Sacraments, according to their calling, either to many or to individuals. For thereby are granted, not bodily, but eternal things, as eternal righteousness, the Holy Ghost, eternal life. These things cannot come but by the ministry of the Word and the Sacraments, as Paul says, Romans 1:16: The Gospel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth. Therefore, since the power of the Church grants eternal things, and is exercised only by the ministry of the Word, it does not interfere with civil government; no more than the art of singing interferes with civil government."
    Augsburg Confession, XXVIII. #8. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 85. Tappert, p. 82. Heiser, p. 23. Romans 1:16

    "Know, therefore, that you must be concerned not only about hearing, but also about learning and retaining it in memory, and do not think that it is optional with you of no great importance, but that it is God's commandment, who will require of you how you have heard, learned, and honored His Word."
    The Large Catechism, The Third Commandment, #98. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 609. Tappert, p. 378. Heiser, p. 175. Exodus 20:8-11.

    Bethany Bombers (WELS terminology)


    Norman Teigen has left a new comment on your post "SP Mark Schroeder - Success Perspective":

    I did not know that WELS had a low regard for the Bethany program pastors. That is news to me. Can you provide any more information on this subject? Why, for example, was there such a program in the first place? I think that there might be some interesting history behind your comment.

    ***

    GJ - The WELS pastors will say to an ELS pastor, "We cherish our fellowship with the ELS," but they won't drive a few miles for an ELS installation service. I was the only WELS pastor at one ELS installation. The congregation had a dozen WELS clergy within a short drive, but not one came. We drove up from Columbus.

    The WELS pastors call their fellow pastors "Bethany Bombers" if they went through the Bethany program, which was once an alternate way to be prepared for attending The Sausage Factory. The guys who went through the official WELS system never let the Bethany program guys forget that they were third-rate (if that). I found the Bethany guys were far more Lutheran and far less brain-washed than the born-in-a-WELS-parochial-school guys.

    WELS ended the Bethany program some years ago.

    Baptist Theologian Takes Congregation Out of LCMS: Charges Missouri with Unionism



    Kent Heimbigner, PhD (Baylor Baptist University), demonstrates the importance of removing red-eye from flash photos.
    (Hint - try Picasa from Google.)


    Baylor University in Waco, Texas, is a private Baptist university, and a nationally ranked liberal arts institution. Chartered in 1845 by the Republic of Texas, Baylor is the oldest, continually operating university in the state. Though 80% of our students come from within Texas, we are home to students from all 50 states, and 70 countries.


    Rev. Kent A Heimbigner, Ph.D., Senior Pastor
    Home: 817-426-0783
    Email: icxcnika@flash.net

    Pastor Kent A. Heimbigner was born on 08 October 1961 in Anaheim, CA. He was baptized in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost two weeks later, on 22 October 1961 at the Lutheran Church of Our Savior in Fullerton, CA. He was confirmed in that same congregation in 1975.

    Pastor Heimbigner was installed as the Pastor of Charity Lutheran Church, Burleson, TX in October of 1997. He was ordained and installed at Grace Lutheran Church, Marlin, TX on 22 August 1990. Pr. Heimbigner served there as Pastor for seven years, prior to becoming Pastor of Charity Lutheran in Burleson.

    A graduate of Point Loma College in San Diego, CA, Pr. Heimbigner earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1985. Thereafter he enrolled at Concordia Seminary in St. Louis, MO, receiving his Master of Divinity (M.Div.) degree in 1989 and a Master of Sacred Theology degree (S.T.M.) in 1991. With a concentration in Dogmatic Theology, his primary research had to do with the relation of the Office of the Holy Ministry to the celebration of the Lord's Supper in Scripture and in the early liturgical writings of the ancient church.

    While serving full-time as a Pastor, Pr. Heimbigner worked part time as a student at Baylor University in Waco, TX, earning a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree in 2001, with a concentration in church history and a teaching minor in philosophy. His dissertation focused on the relation of Christ to Baptism and the Lord's Supper in selected dogmatic and devotional writings of Johann Gerhard (17th century orthodox Lutheran theologian).

    As a clergyman of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod from 1990 through the end of 2008, Pr. Heimbigner served the Synod in various capacities, including being a member of the Texas District floor committee on theology and church relations for the 2003 Texas District convention, LWML zone counsellor, LFL pastoral advisor, Lutheran Music Enrichment instructor, and currently instructor for all religion and philosophy classes offered by Concordia University at Austin's extension campus in Fort Worth, TX. In November of 2008, he received the "Excellence in Teaching" award from the Commission on Accelerated Programs (CAP). Three times, he has been given the opportunity (and accepted it) to teach Reformation History at the Lutheran Theological Seminary in Novosibirsk, Siberia, Russia. Pr. Heimbigner also served on the working group for Eucharistic Liturgies in connection with the Lutheran Hymnal Project, which project has now resulted in the production of the "Lutheran Service Book."


    In his community, Pr. Heimbigner has long been a member of the Rotary Club, first in Marlin and now in Burleson. He has served on the board of directors of the Burleson Rotary Club in several different capacities. Pr. Heimbigner has also served as President, Vice-President, and Treasurer of the Dallas / Fort Worth Area Metro Beekeepers' Association.

    Pastor Heimbigner has published one book (a reworking of his S.T.M. thesis), and anticipates publication of his Ph.D. dissertation in the not too distant future. He has also published articles in the Lutheran Witness, Logia, TableTalk, and other venues. Pastor Heimbigner occasionally is asked to be a guest on the radio talk show Issues Etc.

    Pr. Heimbigner and his wife, Denise, celebrated their 22nd anniversary in August of 2008. They have five children, and live in a home they are purchasing in north Burleson.

    ***

    GJ - Kent was on his way out of Missouri some years ago. He has been seen around ELDONA events. His bio says he worked on the new LCMS hymnal. Will he join the Eastern Orthodox, like Fenton?

    The reasons given are here.

    Todd Wilken (comment) missed the ironic humor.

    In His Steps (Neuhaus' Steps)



    B-16, gloating.



    Married priest is first in Seattle Archdiocese

    By JOHN STARK
    THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

    BELLINGHAM -- The day after his ordination as a Roman Catholic priest, the Rev. Tom McMichael stood in front of the altar at Assumption Church after Sunday Mass, while members of the congregation raised both hands in a gesture of welcome and blessing.

    The welcoming of a new priest is a special moment for any church, but this moment may have been more special than most: At McMichael's side was Karin McMichael, his wife of 23 years.

    McMichael, 48, is the first married priest in the Archdiocese of Seattle, which includes all of Western Washington. He and his wife have two sons, aged 19 and 21. McMichael expects to be working at Assumption part time at least until this summer, while also celebrating weekend Masses at Skagit County churches.

    The Jan. 11 event was no surprise to the parish. McMichael had been on the church staff as a seminarian and deacon for several months, the culmination of a process that began in November 2005. That was when McMichael informed his congregation at Lynden's Hope Lutheran Church that he was resigning to become a Catholic.

    McMichael took that step with no assurance that he would be able to continue the religious vocation he loved.

    "Perhaps the most difficult part of this was giving that up, and not being sure if I would be able to continue," he said. "There was no guarantee that this door would open."

    While priestly celibacy remains the rule in the Roman Catholic Church, there are exceptions. In the 1950s, McMichael said, the Roman church allowed some married Lutheran pastors in Germany to be ordained after conversion. And some small Eastern-rite churches that accept the authority of the pope have a long tradition of married priests.

    In the U.S., Pope John Paul II approved the ordination of converted, married clergymen from other denominations in 1980, according to information on the archdiocese's Web site.

    If some Catholic priests can have wives, why not all?

    "That's not a question I can answer," McMichael said.

    McMichael and every other would-be priest in his situation must apply to the Vatican for permission to be ordained, and must undergo seminary training in Catholic doctrines.

    "They make it very clear ... that this is the exception," McMichael said. "The rule, if you will, in canon law is celibate clergy. But they also acknowledge the possibility of exceptions."

    At present, there are somewhere around 100 such priests in the U.S., McMichael said. He doesn't think he and others like him are paving the way for the general acceptance of marriage for priests.

    "It's not a step toward married clergy as the norm, and I think that's made very clear throughout the process," McMichael said.

    As McMichael tells it, his transition from Lutheran to Catholic, and from Lutheran pastor to Catholic priest, was a long one.

    He was born into a Swedish-rooted Lutheran congregation, where pastors and congregation are, in his words, "very comfortable with Catholic forms, with the Eucharist, with vestments, with a high view of the clergy. ... That was the kind of Lutheran I was, and the kind of Lutheran religion I was attempting to live."

    He got his religious training in a seminary that included other young men training for the Catholic priesthood, and he always felt comfortable with an inclusive view of the Christian faith. As he saw it, reunification of all Christian churches was the ultimate goal, and the reunification of Lutherans with Catholics was part of that.

    The Catholic Church has taken significant steps in that direction in the past 50 years, McMichael said, shifting to celebration of the Mass in local languages and working to smooth out theological differences over the role of faith, good works and divine grace in human salvation.

    But as McMichael saw it, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America was moving in a different direction in the years leading up to his decision to leave, away from the traditional liturgy and becoming more "Protestant," more concerned with maintaining a separate denominational identity.

    "Some of us had to deal with the question of whether we belonged," he said.

    McMichael and his wife decided they didn't. Both made the conversion to the Roman Catholic Church, and both had to submit to "a stack of paperwork" as the first step toward McMichael's Catholic ordination.

    "Rome, and the Archdiocese of Seattle, wanted to have a sense of who I was, and why I was coming," McMichael said.

    He acknowledges that not everyone in his new church, or his old one, may be supportive of what he has done. But he has received support aplenty. Some former parishioners at Hope Lutheran went to Seattle for his ordination, and members of Assumption also have been welcoming, he said.

    He said he especially values the diversity of the Catholic Church: The Assumption congregation is a rainbow of ethnic groups, income levels and theological viewpoints.

    "It has been especially gratifying to be received by people who are coming from very different theological perspectives," he said. "I just rejoice in the gathering for Eucharist with this incredible diversity of people. ... "

    He hopes that his own ministry will further unite, rather than divide.

    "Not everyone can do what I did or would want to," he said.

    UOJ Stormtroppers Getting Nervous



    UOJ Stormtroopers like to remain anonymous. So do the Church and Chicanery fans. But they are really the same people.


    Robert Preus
    "But the imputation of Christ's righteousness to the sinner takes place when the Holy Spirit brings him to faith through Baptism and the Word of the Gospel. Our sins were imputed to Christ at His suffering and death, imputed objectively after He, by His active and passive obedience, fulfilled and procured all righteousness for us. But the imputation of His righteousness to us takes place when we are brought to faith." [procured in italics in text]
    Robert D. Preus, Justification and Rome, St. Louis: Concordia Academic Press 1997, p. 72.

    Abraham Calov: "Although Christ has acquired for us the remission of sins, justification, and sonship, God just the same does not justify us prior to our faith. Nor do we become God's children in Christ in such a way that justification in the mind of God takes place before we believe." [Apodixis Articulorum Fide, Lueneburg, 1684]
    Robert D. Preus, Justification and Rome, St. Louis: Concordia Academic Press 1997, p. 131n.

    Lenski
    "The danger is that by use of the term 'subjective justification' we may lose the objective divine act of God by which He declares the individual sinner righteous ex pistews pistin in the instant faith (embracing Christ) is wrought in him, leaving only the one divine declaration regarding the whole world of sinners, calling this an actus simplex, the only forensic act of God, and expanding this to mean that God declared every sinner free from guilt when Christ was raised from the dead, so many millions even before they were born, irrespective of faith, apart from and without faith. This surely wipes out 'justification by faith alone.' Only his faith is reckoned to him for righteousness."
    R. C. H. Lenski, Interpretation of Romans, Augsburg Publishing House: Minneapolis, 1963 p. 85. Romans 1:17.

    "Nowhere in the bible is any man constituted or declared righteous without faith, before faith; all asservations and argumentations to the contrary notwithstanding." Lenski, Romans, p. 382? Rick Nicholas Curia, The Significant History of the Doctrine of Objective or Universal Justification, Alpine, California: California Pastoral Conference, WELS. January 24-25, 1983. p. 86.

    "As to the doctrine in general, he [Lenski] repudiates and ridicules the teaching that on Easter morning God forgave, really forgave, all the world all its sins, really and truly justified the world. He protests against making objective reconciliation, general justification, mean that God on Easter morning did actually pronounce the world, all individuals making up the world, really innocent of all sin and guilt."
    Theodore Engelder, Objective Justification, Concordia Theological Monthly, 1933, Ft. Wayne: Concordia Seminary Press, n.d. p. 508. 2 Corinthians 5:18-20.

    ***

    GJ - And yet the dual justification scheme can be found - in Pietism, before C. F. W. Walther adopted the nonsense of everyone forgiven without the Word, without the Means of Grace, without faith.

    Church and Chicanery Trademark -
    Permission Required for Use




    The Church and Chicanery Board, by a vote of 6-1, has graciously allowed me to use their official trademark, Busta Gut. I think Ski held out, something about hurting Babtist feelings. Kelm is worried about the image being borrowed.
    Doebler said, "What's wrong with copying cool graphics?"



    Anonymous said...:

    Making a charge stick against the C&Cers will prove next to impossible when it comes to heresy. C&Cers can bob and weave, rationalize, and mislead with the best since facts and reasoning must be checked at the door. The insidious harm comes in shifting the focus from the efficacy of the Word to the efficacy of marketing and buildings while draining WELS’ coffers. They threaten to render the synod anemic and unable to continue

    January 23, 2009 4:04 PM
    Freddy Finkelstein said...:

    For what it is worth, I'll agree: there is little to celebrate, other than the fact that Synod has finally and officially opened the matter to discussion. But to say they won't find “scriptural reasons to condemn” the importation of sectarian worship practices is to miss the point. The COP is correct. The issues involved are extremely complex, and the concerns regarding so-called “non-traditional” worship do not boil down to a matter of opinion. This is the tired line that finally failed – the COP admitted that the “underpinnings of this 'non-traditional' type of worship cannot be ignored.” The “underpinnings” are not a matter of opinion, but a matter of grave concern. Moreover, these concerns are not satiated by a congregation's casual explanation that they “follow a lose liturgical framework based on the Western Rite, and don't really rock-out” in the Divine Service.

    The point is, not only the Scriptures, but the Lutheran Confessions will play a direct and decisive role in deciding this matter. At its foundation the very nature of Confessionalism and the Confessional Principle is at stake, as is a distinction between merely rhetorical unity and true (visible) Unity in doctrine and practice, along with the breadth of this unity with respect to our catholicity. The efficacy of the Means of Grace is at stake, particularly with regard to the troubling fixation and reliance on statistical measures and human methods that assault the Means and very much seem to overshadow them. Fellowship is at stake, not only regarding open association with groups like Willow Creek, but the unmistakable overtures of Fellowship that result from adopting the worship forms of heterodox pop-church Evangelicals. The disruption of christocentric focus in liturgical worship is at issue, especially considering the anthropocentric nature of these sectarian innovations -- which also introduces consideration of the falsehoods that sectarian worship forms inevitably teach to those who practice them. And so, lex orandi, lex credendi also enters the picture, not only from the standpoint of orthodox practice but also that of Fellowship with the heterodox.

    But who knows, Tim may well be right. The Synod in Convention recently resolved to merely “recommend” that Lutheran congregations retain the term “Lutheran” in their name – a recommendation roundly ignored by those the resolution was intended to address – begging the question, “How can a congregation which subscribes to the Lutheran Confessions be Lutheran in everything but name?” Subscription to the Confessions, along with many other things, is a declaration of identity! We must all be diligent to ensure that the next time the Synod in Convention has the opportunity to act, we are not forced to subsequently ask the question, “How can a congregation which subscribes to the Lutheran Confessions be Lutheran in everything but name and practice?” For all the work that has resulted in the COP's official recognition of this issue, the real work lies ahead.
    Freddy Finkelstein

    January 23, 2009 5:41 PM
    Freddy Finkelstein said...:

    And I forgot, in my previous post, at least three other issues related the mess created by CG Church Changers and so-called “non-traditional” worship: (1) the tension created by a call to Divine Worship, that can only be directed to believers, while at the same time consulting unbelievers and accommodating their demands with respect to the ordering of the Divine Service (i.e., church practice) as if they are included in such a call; (2) the nature and extent of Public Ministry and the role of supposed lay “Worship Ministers;" and, (3), directly related to this is the true role of women in congregational ministry, especially those who are positioned in the worship chamber during the Divine Service, either singly or together with an ensemble, specifically to draw attention to themselves, that as objects of attention they may more effectively make use of the Keys in ministering to the congregation in word and song. Are such worshipers Public Ministers? Then why are women involved in preaching to the congregation in word and song? Are such ensembles merely co-worshipers? Then why are they positioned and functioning to address the congregation at all? (If one reads Kretzmann's Christian Art one will readily see the position of Lutherans at his time and before -- the notion of Lutheran "Worship Ministers" is directly rejected).

    There are probably many other issues, but these at least are sufficient to recognize the complexities involved.
    Freddy Finkelstein

    January 23, 2009 7:46 PM
    Anonymous said...:

    Will WELS deal with the C&C issues? While it generally skirts issues, how far will it let the camel's nose of the C&Cers go under the tent flap before tearing down the tent?

    January 24, 2009 8:16 AM
    Anonymous said...:

    The coffee church in Waunakee already has a woman pastor who "administers the Means of Grace."
    Bespoke

    January 24, 2009 9:15 AM
    Anonymous said...:

    "The coffee church in Waunakee already has a woman pastor who 'administers the Means of Grace.'"

    So? The WELS has long admitted women to the Office of the Holy Ministry.

    January 24, 2009 10:50 AM

    ---


    Rev. Kristen proves what I predicted long ago - WELS would be the first after ELCA to ordain women. All the Church and Chicanery leaders need Worship Leaders. What is the pastoral ministry?


    As Staff Minister of Worship, Kristen is responsible for planning and implementing all worship opportunities at St. Andrew. She also oversees the large corps of worship volunteers who serve in many and varied capacities each week. Music is the largest part of the worship ministry at St. Andrew, but the worship ministry also includes lay readers, dramatic and visual arts, hospitality ministries and audio/visual tech support. Kristen works closely with Pastor Hunter to study and understand biblical worship principles and practices, evaluate current worship practices at St. Andrew, and define future directions for St. Andrew’s worship ministry.

    Kristen graduated from Wisconsin Lutheran College in 2003 with a B.A. in Psychology and minors in Communication and Theology. While at WLC she worked for two years in the Campus Ministry Office planning and implementing daily chapel services, organizing various musical groups for worship, and learning from Campus Pastor Nathan Strobel. She is currently pursuing Staff Ministry certification from Martin Luther College.

    Kristen grew up in the Pacific Northwest and always intended to return there after college, but God had other plans for her. He has planted her firmly in the family of faith at St. Andrew and for this she is truly and deeply grateful. When she’s not writing services or running rehearsals, Kristen spends her time reading science fiction and classic literature, playing piano, writing music, taking long walks in good weather, staying connected with friends and family, and generally enjoying life.

    “The best part of my job is knowing that my work directly impacts the spiritual lives of those who worship here and enables them to connect with God. I say this with a full and complete understanding (and appreciation!) of the fact that the actual work is done by the Holy Spirit through the means of grace – but it is a great privilege and a great joy to be an instrument in ‘administering God’s grace’ in the form of worship gatherings. The second most rewarding aspect of my work is assisting all sorts of members of the congregation in bringing their gifts to God and to each other as joyful offerings. How exciting it is to see brothers and sisters in Christ – of all ages! – learning and working together to serve God and His people. The interpersonal connections made and the spiritual lessons learned through this ministry are invaluable blessings from our gracious God.”

    The Minister of Worship can be contacted online.

    Friday, January 23, 2009

    The Rules versus The Synod Rules



    The charges are definitely stickical,
    When all the rules followed are Biblical.


    Anonymous said...(Bailing Water:

    Making a charge stick against the Church and Changers will prove next to impossible when it comes to heresy. C&Cers can bob and weave, rationalize, and mislead with the best since facts and reasoning must be checked at the door. The insidious harm comes in shifting the focus from the efficacy of the Word to the efficacy of marketing and buildings while draining WELS’ coffers. They threaten to render the synod anemic and unable to continue

    January 23, 2009 4:04 PM

    ***

    GJ - Yes and no. I have heard this excuse before. I was able to prove Floyd Luther Stolzenburg a heretic with one question - "If an evangelism effort fails, is it because the wrong methods were used?"

    Stolzenburg jumped in and said, "Yes!" and began to explain.

    DP Mueller said, "No," only to have Kuske jump in and defend Floyd's doctrine, as he always did.

    Mueller had to talk over his vapid VP and point out the Biblical doctrine of the Word.

    Previously, Mueller promised that if I proved Stolzenburg a heretic, LPR would be shut down.

    Nothing of the sort happened. Instead, Mueller, Kuske, and Schroer all insisted that it never happened. At another meeting to silence me, Schroer said, disingenuously, "I have nothing in my notes."

    Their problem was that I told a lot of people what happened, so the officials were caught in another lie. But what was one more lie in a string of them?

    Zehms and Stolzenburg--aided and abetted by Mueller-Kuske--caused so much damage in Colubmus with their precious Church Growth Movement that LRP was finally shut down. The goal all along, as Wally Oelhafen explained, was to get Floyd a call in the Wisconsin Synod. No effort was spared. Wally, with "I love CGM" tatooed on his right deltoid, was in Kuske's corner.

    So they supported Stolzenburg in getting a call to an independent Lutheran congregation. He is still there.

    The moral of this story is - it depends on which rules are followed. The Wisconsin sect has a thousand unspoken but understood rules. If purely doctrinal questions are asked and follow up questions are permitted, the heretics could be identified in a few minutes.

    For instance, Kelm has paraded his love of Reformed doctrine for decades. At 64, is he going to find a way out of his published errors? Why is he in fellowship with the Willow Creek Association? WELS supposedly left unionism in the 19th century. Kelm and Parlow brought it back officially at St. Mark, Depere. Trapp did the same at his Willow Creek franchise, jointly operated by WELS.

    Bruce Becker has attacked the efficacy of the Word alone. One of his latest communications asked congregations what worked in addition to the Word. He insisted on hiring Kelm and adding to the synod's financial burdens.

    When the synod politicians start explaining how difficult it is to deal with a pastoral adulterer (with clout) or a heretic, the sect rules are being followed. So this will really depend on which rules are normative.

    WELS Layman Questions



    The marks (notae) of Pietism.



    Dear Dr. Jackson,

    Greetings, from yet another disgruntled WELS layman. I wasn’t sure how to ask you a long question on theology. Do you like them to be asked through Ichabod? Anyway, I really appreciate your hard work: you have done a great service to laymen everywhere who would otherwise be left in the dark. I am very close to leaving the synod, but, for some reason, I have gotten hung up on how justification relates to election. I’m not sure if that should hinder my withdrawal; I suppose, if the WELS is suffering from a specific false doctrine which they’ll never change, that would make me lose more hope than if they were just suffering from pietism.

    I have read TSW, especially chapter five, quite thoroughly. I think I am close to understanding justification. What made me think about justification in relation to election was a little reference in an article by Jacob A. O. Preus, “Martin Chemnitz on the Doctrine of Justification,” http://www.wlsessays.net/files/PreusChemnitz.pdf on p. 7,

    [The Council of] Trent urged that “justification does not consist only in the remission of sins and free reconciliation, but it also includes the renewal of the mind and the will through the Holy Spirit.” This, of course, is a perversion of the distinction between law and Gospel and makes our justification before God contingent in part on our obedience to the law. It was this very error, creeping back into Lutheranism, which caused Walther, Pieper, H. A. Preus, and others to stress the objective aspect of reconciliation and justification.

    But, with my resources limited to the WLS essay file on the web (and Ichabod, of course) I cannot find any reference as to how the Election Controversy led Missouri and the WELS to stress objective justification, at least in WELS essays. (I know you have been focusing on A. Hoenecke’s historical connection to UOJ on Ichabod, but in other essays dealing with the controversy, he isn’t even quoted mentioning justification at all. So could it have been that important to them?) I know that this is the one of the most difficult areas of theology, where we reach the obvious limitations of our reason and the revealed will of God. But none the less, it was important enough for Lenski to write against, and since few understand him today as well as you do, I would like to ask you the following:

    Should your view of election affect your view of justification?

    Do you agree with the stance that Lenski and the Ohio synod took in the Election controversy?

    Or was he wrong on election, and right on Justification?

    Here are some quotes that I have found in two WELS essays on the subject:

    From The Election Controversy in the Synodical Conference By R. Dennis Rardin: http://www.wlsessays.net/files/RardinElection.pdf p. 32.

    Lenski’s rejection of objective or universal justification results from his belief in election iniuitu fidei. Calling faith a cause or condition of election warps its role as purely an organon leptikon. Lenski simply gave faith the same role in justification as he gave it in election—to him it became a cause or condition of justification.

    From The Doctrine of Conversion By T.R. Adascheck: http://www.wlsessays.net/files/AdascheckDoctrine.PDF p. 2

    The Ohio and Iowa Synods also taught that man's conversion was entirely due to the grace of God. But they limited this grace. They taught that it was effective only in those who offered natural resistance to God's grace, while it was ineffective in those who offered willful resistance.

    p.3:
    Dr. Lenski repeatedly uses the expression "natural and willful" resistance. They teach that natural resistance is present with all men when the grace of God approaches, but this natural resistance can be overcome by the Holy Ghost. It is not obstacle to conversion. But willful resistance that they define as a mysterious wickedness that goes beyond the natural depravity of man, the Holy Ghost cannot overcome.

    On the Chronicle of the Predestinarian Conflict By G.Fritschel as quoted and translated by a seminary student http://www.wlsessays.net/files/SchroederHoenecke.pdf on p. 19

    Fritschel is commenting on Hoenecke’s second thesis of election which is: “2. The eternal election of God is the cause of the faith of the elect.”

    However, the election did not happen in view of the faith of the elect. One sees (here most decidedly Missouri’s doctrine is pronounced) that not the general gracious will of God concerning all men, but the special grace of election of only a certain few is designated as the source from which faith flows forth. The result is that those who are not predestined cannot even come to faith; and one sees therefore that it was completely true, when Prof. Loy explained in The Lutheran Standard that the second thesis contained “an open denial of Lutheran doctrine.”

    It is interesting to note that in the two articles by Hoenecke included in this student’s paper, not one mention is made of Objective Justification. The first article is from the Gemeinde-Blatt in 1878, Volume 13, Number 9. “Wenn Gott allein die Menschen bekehren kann und muß und solches thut ohne des Menschen Zuthun, woher kommt es denn, daß so viele Menschen unbekehrt bleiben?” and the other article is from the April 15, 1880 issue of Evangelish-Lutherisches Gemeinde Blatt, Volume 15, Number 16. entitled “Zur Lehre von der Gnadenwahl.”

    Thanks,

    WELS Layman

    ***

    GJ - I would not be in a hurry to quit WELS over this issue. Many laymen are well read on this subject and forcing the issue. Besides, the other synods are also wedded to UOJ through Walther and Pieper. Hoenecke has been largely ignored, especially by WELS. If they take any longer to translate his slender Dogmatik, it will be too late. Christ will return sooner than they can finish.

    Lenski did not agree with OJ at all. As he wrote, no one is justified--apart from faith--in the Bible.

    A researcher I know has already found the two justifications in a Pietistic dogmatics book widely used in Germany and America, in use in English for about 60 years in America. There are earlier instances, my scholarly friend says. I do not have all the material, which will be revealed in the fullness of time.

    Simply put, the two justifications are not found in the Bible, Luther, the Book of Concord, Chemnitz, Melanchthon, or the later orthodox theologians. What Jack Preus wrote is pure hooey. Robert Preus finally backed away from UOJ in his final book.

    I will write a book on this, but not in 2009. I am trying to gather background information now.

    I hope my review of the History of Pietism will help provide more insights about this. There may be some synodical exceptions, but I think all the Lutherans in America passed through Pietism before coming here, and many stayed with it. That started with the Muhlenberg tradition (ULCA, LCA) and continued with Scandinavian Lutheran migration and the LCMS.

    Because of Pietism, the efficacy of the Word in the Means of Grace was neglected, even ignored, in the Synodical Conference.