Showing posts with label C. F. W. Walther. Show all posts
Showing posts with label C. F. W. Walther. Show all posts

Friday, April 26, 2013

Extra Nos: Walther: The closer to Luther the better the theologian...unless



Extra Nos: Walther: The closer to Luther the better the theologian...unless:



Walther: The closer to Luther the better the theologian...unless

I have been looking over the Net on some striking Walther quotes.

How many times have I heard the famous C. F. W. Walther quote - the closer to Luther, the better the theologian?

Walther is held up as a guru by Synodical Lutherans; this pastor even said that the closer one is to Walther, the better is the theologian.

There is one example of fanatic if you ever want to find one.


During Walther's controversy on the doctrine of election, learned men frequently quoted to Walther the fathers of the Lutheran church.  Here is what Walther said, you can find the full quote in here.



The principal means by which our opponents endeavor to support their doctrine, consists in continually quoting passages from the private writings of the fathers of our Church, published subsequent to the _Formula of Concord_. But whenever a controversy arises concerning the question, whether a doctrine is Lutheran, we must not ask: "What does this or that 'father' of the Lutheran Church teach in his private writings?" for he also may have fallen into error;


Those words of Walther are an epitome of the quip - take my advice, I am not using it.


In reality, what Walther really meant in practice was - the closer to Luther, the better the theologian, unless, the theologian teaches against me (because the said theologian must be in error).

The words in red are my interpretation of his behaviour on how he handled criticism. In fact his UOJ followers have the same attitude towards their critics... they must be wrong.

When a person falls for a fallacy, one does not stop at swallowing just one fallacious argument. The person invariably swallows the next one and the one after that and so on and on.

Here is another Walther quote from this site and IMHO, shows that Walther and Huber were cut from the same cloth.

We are not reconciled to God when we believe, but we are already redeemed, are already reconciled to God, so that we believe.  This is also true regarding justification.  The whole world is already justified in Christ.  Faith is not the condition under which we are justified but the way and means by which we become partakers of the justification which God has long ago given us

There is the fallacy of misreading Romans 4:25.

A fish is caught through its mouth.

'via Blog this'

***

GJ - The little Walther book on Election is illuminating, because Walther teaches election without faith in his invented catechism and proves he is right by referring the reader to the same catechism.

Even worse, Walther quotes Luther constantly with the implication that Luther was talking about someone just like CFW.

Luther taught the Word, but Walther taught Walther.


Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Spinning the Bishop Stephan Story - Missouri Mythology


The Missouri Synod fabricates the CFW Walther saga, and they also spin the Bishop Stephan story.

This is a summary, based on reading in: 
Zion on the Mississippi
In Pursuit of Religious Sexual Freedom
Servant of the Word, etc.


#1 - Bishop Stephan and his followers were orthodox Lutherans persecuted by the government for their doctrinal purity.
Fact - Stephan, his congregation, and his clergy followers were cell group Pietists. Stephan's congregation was given permission to engage in conventicles because of its history and original Bohemian (Pietistic) membership. Read up on the Zinzendorf connection.

#2 - Walther did not sign the covenant making Martin Stephan their bishop-for-life.
Fact - Walther signed it. Walther was the bishop's enforcer but Stephan mistrusted CFW and called him a "fox."

#3 - Walther and his clergy removed Stephan for false doctrine, a claim that contradicts #1.
Fact - Walther and the clergy accepted Stephan's religious leadership, and Walther's false concept of justification came directed from Stephan and never changed. Therefore, if Stephan was a false teacher all along (as any Lutheran would concede), then Walther was a false teacher the entire time.

#4 - Walther and the clergy suddenly found out about Stephan's adultery in America, when women confessed their sins after a particularly moving sermon.
Fact - Stephan was known for his female groupies in Dresden, lived with his mistress at the spa (where he was treated for syphilis), installed a young woman in a room in his parsonage, faced the court (represented by Marbach, Vehse) for his philandering and late night walks with young women, took his mistress rather than his wife to America, and created problems for having young women around him in St. Louis. One was Walther's young niece, whom Walther kidnapped.

#5 - The Saxons, once they found out about Stephan's adultery, offered him three choices, so he voluntarily left Perryville, Missouri for Illinois.
Fact - Walther's hand-picked mob threatened Stephan's life, stripped and searched him, stole all his gold, books, and personal possessions, then forced him at gunpoint across the Mississippi, probably on a steamer.

#6 - Stephan stole money as he left the group or had his mistress bring stolen money to him.
Fact - Walther and his mob stole from Stephan. First Walther manipulated the title to the 80 acres given to Stephan by the colony. (Kieschnick did something similar and became DP, the SP of the LCMS. They wanted a true Waltherian.) Leaving Stephan supporters in St. Louis, Walther brought the mob down to rob and depose Stephan. All the clergy leaders knew the bishop was a serial adulterer, and the two lawyers (Vehse, Marbach) defended the bishop in court back in Dresden. Mrs. Stephan testified about her husband's many affairs. The crisis in leadership had to be syphilis among the young women and the bankrupt state of the group from Stephan and clergy mismanagement.

#7 - The bishop's wife was at fault for his wandering ways - Walther, quoted in Servant of the Word.
Fact - This slander alone should suffice to prove how malicious Walther was. Stephan's syphilis killed his wife and led to many of his children being born severely damaged from congenital syphilis. You do not want to read about what this does to children. They were institutionalized and died young. Stephan had a dozen (12) children, so he did not appear to be neglected. David Scaer just fell off the beet wagon or he was ignorant of the facts. His review of the Stephan book has the advantage of apparent candor. Stephan was treated for eczema, says Scaer! When a man has children born with congenital syphilis, they can be deaf and have malformed teeth. Three of Stephan's children were born deaf.

All these facts can be sorted out by studying various accounts of the Saxon voyage. Stephan left from house arrest for his many crimes. Walther evaded arrest warrants for kidnapping. His future mother-in-law (who also helped with the Perryville riot) was thrown into jail for her part.

Thus far - the Human Nature of C. F. W. Walther, usurper extraordinaire.








Friday, February 1, 2013

How To Learn about Walther

This is the creepy Walther shrine in St. Louis.
There are three Walther statues in Missouri: inside this shrine, at the Purple Palace, and in Perryville.
Someone asked about learning the true story of Walther.

First, students of history should gather as many documents as possible and test whether the claims of Missouri mythology are valid.

Zion on the Mississippi is easy to obtain on the used book market.

Philip Stephan's The Pursuit of Religious Freedom is the recently published saga of the Stephan clan, which gave so much to the LCMS and has received so little in return.

The attorney Vehse, who handled Stephan's affairs in Europe and went along to America, returning in disgust, also chronicled the great escape from Babylon. His account in German and English is all over the used book zones.

Ludwig Fuerbringer, whose father married the widow of O. H. Walther (Ferdy's brudder), wrote two memoirs about Missouri - both of them excellent. They are out there and easy to buy for about $10.

The books of Missouri mythology are also worthwhile, because they add important details. The ones above are far more analytical, but the gushing tomes also give away clues.

Servant of the Word is a gusher with some genuine surprises. Walther blamed Mrs. Stephan for the bishop's adultery! In case you wonder about being abused and then accused in Missouri, here is an example in print. Stephan gave his wife and children syphilis, but his adultery was her fault. Walther offered that slander "privately" and CPH published the calumny for all the world to read.

Re-reading Zion showed me that Walther's complicty in Stephan's adultery has always been known. Walther was not only the enforcer in the Stephan sex cult, he was also the pimp. There was no sudden, shocking admission of adultery from one (or two?) women. They all knew or chose not to know. It was a public court case. Stephan was under house arrest until he was released to leave for America. Vehse and Marbach were his lawyers in Dresden, his lay leaders on the way to Missouri.

The Stephan book fills in many gaps. Zion shows how Walther organized the hand-picked mob that invaded Perryville. The mob threatened the bishop's life, then robbed him of all gold, books, personal possessions, and land. They forced Stephan across the river to Illinois at gunpoint. And yet this farce of pastoral practice is portrayed today in Perryville as "giving Stephan three alternatives."

He began his crime spree by kidnapping his niece and nephew from his father's parsonage.
His father was deathly ill at the time.
The police put arrest warrants out for Walther,
and Walther's future mother-in-law went to jail for her part in hiding the children.



Thursday, December 13, 2012

Walther Said - "Slavery is good!"

The syphilitic founder of the LCMS, Martin Stephan,
chose a slave state for his groupie Zion.
His Pietistic Bohemians owned slaves.

Norman Teigen wrote on the Opionator blog, New York Times:

Another German reactionary was CFW Walther who was the founding father of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod. Walther defended slavery using arguments from the Southern slavery apologists. He sided with the Confederate side in the 1861 St. Louis arsenal conflict. Walther did not raise the stars and bars, as some deteactors claimed, over the Lutheran seminary which he headed. Walther did greatly offend Lutherans in Minnesota and Wisconsin who withdrew their sons from the St. Louis seminary. Walther never retracted his slavery remarks. Walther became a highly revered ecclesiastical figure. His elaborate tomb is in St. Louis. Some Lutherans continue to defend Walther's slavery writings although his church does not.

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

A. Berean Has Issues with Stormtroopers Allergic to Faith



A. Berean has left a new comment on your post "UOJ Stormtroopers Allergic to Faith. Preach Faith ...":

I'm studying Homiletics right now and I have to say, I don't understand why Walther would make a statement like that... He is telling Lutheran pastors not to mention faith, or exhort their hearers to the importance of faith while preaching when the Scriptures (in particular the Apostle Paul) do just that. Maybe it's because I'm a student and I have a fresher perspective, but things like this really bother me as someone who is studying to be a pastor...

---

Febreze has left a new comment on your post "UOJ Stormtroopers Allergic to Faith. Preach Faith ...":

Once you get your M.Div go to the ELDoNA. With your kind of comments, you wouldn't last long in the WELS, ELS, or LCMS. If you're at one of those schools, you must be pretty quiet in class ;)

***

Amazing resemblance, eh?


GJ - Lutherans should give up on Walther as the ultimate answer man. He had some good insights here and there, but he should be treated as equal to tv evangelists, not Jesus. I wonder if Ferdy had a complex that made him see himself as the epitome of all religious prophets. That self-image is quite an accomplish for a man who went no farther than a bachelor's degree at a rationalistic university, serving as the enforcer for a Pietistic, degenerate bully.

People know how bad the Stephan-Walther combination was. Most of the facts were revealed in Zion on the Mississippi. In spite of the hysteria from St. Walther crowd, the Stephan book does not add much more to the saga, but definitely fills in the details. I expected Zion to counter the allegations in the Stephan book, but the earlier history supports the Stephan clan's account in all respects.

Someone else reported the bishop's syphilis to me. The Stephan book gives away the symptoms without naming the odious venereal disease. Zion shows that everyone knew about Stephan's adultery with young girls. The Stephan book fills in the court testimony about his European promiscuity.






Thursday, March 22, 2012

Missouri Demonstrates How Synods Grab Property:
No Relief from Waltherian Matt Harrison?

At Home in the Hoosegow of My Fathers
Walther left Europe early to escape arrest warrants for kidnapping.
Zion reports that other minor children, including girls, were also smuggled to  America.


bruce-church (http://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "The UOJ Position Was Refuted Shortly after the Boo...":

It looks like the ULC chapel sale was a secret work in progress at the district level ever since 2001. Up to that year the Southern MN District held the deed, paid the property expenses, and paid for the chaplain. Then in 2001 an agreement was struck whereby the congregation became tenants who paid $42,000 in rent to the district, and the congregation paid the campus pastor. So the district in 2011 sold the building out from under the congregation based on the false charges that ULC was a bad tenant because they installed a washer and dryer and rented out space w/o authorization and kept the money. One can see the district was hoping to sell the building to real estate developers for an entire decade:

http://stand-firm.blogspot.com/2012/03/districts-gone-bad.html

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjXYoZj1WotD77gO7TL8thvuJJazEBgxE33hklK6ZwqWCft3XHEsmqQrhtFjNwK5pCjDS2ss-dnBprk29MpgoqL8WeYoNtZdQh8Zsgkztm24p980er2jQvfzV90YfL0hy8LAlFx3kwwU_hm/s1600/ULC+Resolution.jpg 

***

GJ - Walther was an Antinomian legalist. He had a law for everyone except himself. The Saxon society got out of its financial crisis by robbing their bishop and sending to Illinois at gunpoint. Zion on the Mississippi says they all knew Stephan was a serial adulterer.

Today the Olde Synodical Conference claims that the Great Walther handled the matter well.

Fake-o-Bod Tim
"Jackson and his ilk will try all they want to discredit the WELS in connection with Joel Hochmuth's arrest. But WELS has handled the situation well." Yes, it sounds familiar - same UOJ DNA.

Friday, March 2, 2012

Double-talk from Walther Led to Double-talk
In the Olde Synodical Conference.
Deception Is Standard Behavior



The synods still control the news, because they follow the same rule as secular politics. Access is everything. A journalist who dares to tell the truth about a politician will no longer get interview time or a even a place in the reporters' pool.

Most Lutheran blogs follow the same principle. The leaders do not want anything except their version to come out. That applies to individual blogs, where pastors shut them down or try to control them. Synodical leaders, who cannot discipline the wildest heretic, will make sure that individuals do not post any independent thoughts or express support of anyone on the demi-semi-secret shun list.

Did Jack Preus, Ralph Bohlmann, Al Barry, and Matt Harrison
get elected by chance?

Christian News has always been as independent as the company Xerox room. I have been there more than once when various people were phoning and faxing to control the news flow. SP Schroeder used to email and phone me, to get his spin across. All of it was top secret, of course. That stopped when I no longer seemed useful. Ditto, DP Buchholz' charm offensive. Of course, Buchholz needed to devote his time and energy to the future discipline of Jeff Gunn, Church and Change emergent guru.

Jeff Gunn, WLC board member,
bored of Lutheran doctrine.

Since I heard about Gunn's upcoming discipline directly from DP Buchholz, I have been waiting and watching for years, only to see Gunn elected to the Wisconsin Lutheran College (WELS) board - one of three board members from the same congregation, and to observe Gunn serving as a leader at a WELS conference. Buchholz promoted the conference in his own newsletter. Buchholz does not write  to me anymore - sob - and I blocked him on FB, because he thought it was his business who my FB friends are.

Schroeder and Buchholz were going to reform WELS. Sure. Buchholz signed the secret petition about dealing with Jeske, then endorsed the edited version that said the opposite. I hate to quote Paul McCain on anything, but I like  this one. Jack Preus came into McCain's office at the Purple Palace, lit a cig, and said, "You younger pastors are all pansies." If anyone glaces at Bob and Jack Preus' battles, the pansy generation cannot compare in any fashion. They are the worst double-talkers, but Walther created the template for all of them.

Walther's Pastoral Theology.

Walther's Double-Talk

Walther was a double-dealer with Stephan, the double-talking Pietist who thought he was in charge of the souls and bodies of the women in his congregation (court testimony). In Zion on the Mississippi we have the published statement that everyone knew about Stephan's adultery (long before In Pursuit of Religious Freedom came out). But Zion also contains the claim that Loerber sermon led to the shocking and surprising confessions of adultery with Stephan, a story impossible to believe - given the times and the closeness of the Saxon group.

In case anyone forgot, Stephan left his wife and most of his children in Dresden, but took his mistress along to America. The Saxons paid for the entire Stephan family to come over, but only his son and mistress came on board. Walther blamed Mrs. Stephan for the marital difficulties, even though court testimony shows that she was always willing to reconcile, in spite of her knowledge of his many infidelities. Stephan earned an STD in Dresden, and it was not a divinity degree. That is why he spent all the time in the spas with his groupies, getting treatment for his syphilitic rashes.

Walther pledged his fidelity to Bishop Stephan while working against the man, behind his back. Why did Walther travel from St. Louis to Perry County, "knowing" about the adultery, but never speaking to the bishop about it? Walther was secretly stealing land from Stephan (the 80 acres given to the bishop) and organizing his followers for the upcoming mob action. Walther's future mother-in-law, who hid the kidnapped minor children and went to jail, was included in the planning for riot, robbery, and next kidnapping.

Does anyone wonder why Synodical Conference leaders are so dishonest, unethical, and sanctimonious? They have descended from Walther and his in-bred Saxon clan.

We are supposed to believe that the Olde Synodical Conference has been a beacon of Lutheran orthodoxy in the midst of a Pietistic, unionistic Lutheran groups - who would not humble themselves to listen to Walther. The Saxon group was 100% Pietistic and only began to move toward Luther's doctrine later. Both influences can clearly be seen in their history (WELS and ELS, too). Some are Book of Concord Lutherans,  loyal to Luther's Biblical doctrine. Others are Waltherian Enthusiasts. The dominant group follows Walther's unethical, devious power grabs.

That is why no one believes Missouri, WELS, or the Little Sect will be viable alternatives to ELCA, not that the new splits are more than retro versions of ELCA.

"And then we heard a shocking confession or two,
so we gathered 300 people, rode down to Perry County,
threatened the bishop's life, stole his land,
took away his life savings, grabbed his library,
and forced him into Illinois at gunpoint.
We gave him a few bucks, a few implements, and a shack."
Stephan's mistress arrived soon after to live in the first Love Shack.

Friday, February 24, 2012

Synodical Conference History Is Wide Open for Viewing,
But the Myth-Makers Fill the Air with Falsehoods

Compare and contrast C. F. W. Walther


Someone on the Net claimed I was discussing some "secret history:" of the LCMS.

The only new wrinkle in Walther history is the Philip Stephan book, In Pursuit of Religious Freedom. That book fills in quite a few details about Stephan's life and the Walther-led mob action. Paul McCain railed against the book, which de facto verified its overall truthfulness.

The only fact I have introduced is Bishop Martin Stephan's syphilis. Someone else pointed me to LCMS research that verified Stephan's STD (not a doctoral degree, in this case). Anyone can look up the symptoms of syphilis, Stephan's symptoms, and the mob action to arrive at the same conclusions, without a post-mortem blood test.

Adultery
I was re-reading Zion on the Mississippi this week. Stephan continued his degenerate ways in St. Louis. Although he came over without his wife, many women were allowed to hang around him, including his main mistress and Walther's kidnapped niece (who died young). The paragraph gave me a shock.

Walther knew all about Stephan, but he let his young niece hang around the randy bishop? Zion gives plenty of evidence that Stephan's behavior was well known in Dresden, continued on the ocean voyage, and expanded in America.

Syphilitic Delusions - Last Stages
Zion described how bizarre Stephan's behavior became when they arrived in America. The author ascribed it to Stephan's new title, but the range of actions is more harmonious with the final stage of syphilis, when the pathogen attacks the brain in earnest. Stephan's plans and spending were grandiose, but the clergy (including the Walthers) approved his spending. The clergy withdrew money for themselves, too, although not at the rate of the Right Reverend Stephan.

The bishop's adultery was not new. The trip was delayed because of Stephan's house-arrest. The bishop's spending was approved by the clergy advisory group. The new factor was the spread of syphilis in their close-knit group, which included physicians. Young ladies with syphilis were enough to cause a riot, even though adultery did not raise eyebrows.

The Walther Mythology
The real scandal is the Walther mythology promoted by LCMS and Synodical Conference politicians. Since they know the truth, much of it residing in the Concordia Historical Institute, where McCain once enjoyed a sinecure, their crowing about Missouri history is a sham, a disgrace, and another layer of lies on top of many others.

But the facts are there, even in the official hagiographies. More will be published later.




Sunday, February 12, 2012

Extra Nos: Romans 4:25 UOJ Fallacies

Extra Nos: Romans 4:25 UOJ Fallacies:


Yet Scripture teaches only one justification; namely, the one by faith in Christ, Romans 3:28. (Walter A. Maier II, A Summary Exposition of The Doctrine of Justification By Grace
Through Faith)



UOJ stands for Universal Objective Justification which teaches that there are two justifications. The first one is called objective justification, the one (so they say) was when Jesus was raised from the dead, God (according to LC-MS/WELS/ELS, American Synods) in Christ has declared the whole world already righteous. This has already passed and for all people. The other one is called subjective, this will come about when you believe what the first one says about you.

Make no mistake, they do not mean the object of your faith should be the Atonement, not that; they want you to believe the one past that, when (according to UOJers) God has declared you righteous/forgiven already. It has already passed and you believe that (so they say) past declaration that happened before you were born.

I asked one UOJ pastor the following and you will find the conversation here.

Me: Atonement you said in the previous comments that it is the object of faith.(sic)(?)

Response: I did not say that. I have always spoken of God's forgiveness, through and on the basis of the death and resurrection of Christ, as the object of faith.

In my early years, I thought it was the Atonement that they meant and I thought it was a labeling mistake, I bought into UOJ before, until I looked deeper.

This is the reason why they won't buy the suggestion to rename OJ to OA, Objective Atonement, or OP, Objective Propitiation. Why not? It is because that is not what they believe! Atonement is not their object of faith, this is contrary to Romans 3:25, where Jesus as Propitiation is the object of faith in that verse. In fact one can say the object of faith in UOJ is not the person or work of Jesus but the justification that has already happened to you in the past when Jesus was raised from the dead.

Where did this idea of come from. Many verses have been alluded too but the famous one is their interpretation of Romans 4:25. According to LC-MS teaching (and the others like WELS/ELS etc.) the "our" mentioned in Romans 4:25 refers to "us human beings in general". You can find this in LC-MS Brief Statement 1932, Article 17b. This verse is extracted from Romans 4:24 and completely isolates it from its context as well as disrespects the nature of St. Paul' rhetorical expression of this verse. Indeed, this is where the LC-MS/WELS/ELS are isolated and cut off from the rest of the Protestant world because if you look at the way independent exegetes and even some Lutheran NT scholars interpret this (non LC-MS/WELS/ELS), there is no way you can responsibly take "our" as the whole unbelieving world. Indeed their interpretation of this verse is truly novel and unique, it stands alone in the Protestant world!

You do not need to be knowledgeable of the Greek to ascertain this. You just need to respect the overall context, "our" refers to believers and the verse is a rhetorical verse.

The first fallacy they claim is this - they say you have to believe in Limited Atonement if you do not accept their interpretation.

This is a non-sequitur bull. The other is that it is the fallacy of tertium non datur; it thinks there is no third possibility. This is a fallacy because there are other Scriptures that teach of Jesus' Atonement as for all people, for example, 1 John 2:1-2, John 3:16 etc., yet justification is not universal but only happens to those who receive by faith in that Propitiation (see again Romans 3:25).

Their (UOJer's) interpretation of Romans 4:25 is "quasi-universalistic" or "crypto-universalistic".

They do not want me to quote to them R. C. H. Lenski because they already branded and gave him a black propaganda, even though Evangelical scholars respect him! Remember what St. Paul said about Elders? He said that they should be respected by outsiders or have a good reputation from outsiders. Apparently this is not valued by UOJers despite the fact that Lenski fits what St. Paul required, to be respected by those outside one's sphere of influence. So I will quote another Lutheran, Peter Stuhlmacher, (Paul's Letter to the Romans, a Commentary, p. 75), on this verse:


Christ's act of sacrifice on the cross ordained by God and endorsed as valid by the resurrection, is and remains the legal ground for the justification of all those who, as the "ungodly", believe in the God who revealed himself in Christ. God's salvific righteousness comes to pass in the resurrected Christ from "now"(Romans 3:21) until the final judgement (Romans 8:33f).

The other fallacy that UOJers commit is to claim that - well if you believe that interpretation then you will have faith in your faith.

This is another fallacy which is called "post hoc ergo propter hoc".

I can not begin to unravel this fallacy, there is so much I could day.

Notice that the objections by UOJers stem not from what the Scripture says, they are not exegetical objections, they are rationalistic objections. The line goes "if you believe that, then you should believe this" etc. This fallacy is easy to spot if you step back for a moment and analyse the objection, the objection does not stem from the text of Scripture, it stems from not believing this or that. The objection is strewn into a straw man argument already and so if you get sucked in such reasoning, the conclusion is already drawn for you. You just have to slot in their paradigm that is why people will not release easily their crutch on UOJ. It is addicting.

We are to believe what Scripture says not believe what we want to believe. In the case of UOJ on this verse, the belief is already determined and so the verse is just coerced to fit that belief. Is this honest or right handling of Scripture?

The unfortunate and nasty thing about UOJers is that they are quick to label as "heretics" those who oppose or are skeptic of their views. Now how many times have I been called that? Take a good look at the exegesis of well known exegetes of the past on this verse. Go to Sanday and Headlam's, or C. K. Barrett's exegetical work. They all agree with Lenski and Stuhlmacher. I will even later go to a theological library and get C. E. B. Cranfield's work and check his take on this. The Book of Proverbs says that in the multitude of counselors there is safety.

The name calling tactic has been employed before by the arch UOJ promoter C. F. W. Walther. UOJers are like their father in the faith. He was cultic and branded those who opposed his cultic ideas as "heretics" so, it is not surprising to see his UOJ followers to be cultic too.

Remember, ex falso quod libet, from what is false, you can deduce anything. UOJ is filled with fallacy and from a falsehood, you can prove anything. That is not a strength, it is a weakness that should be rejected.


'via Blog this'

***

GJ - And the WELS experts say, "You don't know Greek, so you cannot argue with me about this." First of all, that is completely false and utterly arrogant - with no basis in fact. The typical WELS graduate knows a little Greek but not much.

After I tutored LI in Latin, Greek, and Hebrew, he tutored students at Northwestern College (WELS, RIP) because their own professors could not get the students to grasp Greek. LI was cleaning up by tutoring four students at a time, which was allowed.

Secondly, as Dr. Cruz has stated, all doctrine can be shown to be true in plain English. Truly, it is horrifying that poorly trained ministers are teaching in the Roman Catholic style. They are the priesthood. No one can disagree with them. Holy Mama Synod agrees with them, so they are infallible. Just ask them. Wait. They will insist on it without being asked.

Meanwhile, they are inserting their doctrinal stupidity and errors between the sincere lay-member and the Word of God.

Why do they learn Spanish for missions? Portuguese? (Not Richard Starr, but the real missionaries) African languages? The WELS guys should teach everyone Greek (if they could) and preach in Greek, because Greek is required to catch to volatile essence of UOJ.

Here is the basis for WELS missionary work - telling people, from the start, "You are already forgiven, already saved.."

If you can say that without bursting into laughter, you can get free trips around the world.


Monday, January 30, 2012

Walther the Divider

Walther divided Lutherans
and worked to create his own myth.


I keep reading early LCMS history. I have a pile of books I am sending to another researcher. The official LCMS books remind me of Mormon and Roman Catholic devotionals. Nevertheless, history has a way of leaving behind crucial details.

One detail is the incredible closeness of the pioneers and how they protected themselves from scandal and prison by keeping the secrets. C. F. W. Walther's brother married one Buenger sister and Ferdinand married another one. Walther's brother died and Ferdinand took his call in St. Louis. Ludwig Fuerbringer's father married the Walther widow, which made Ferdinand his uncle. The Buenger family was directly involved in the kidnapping of Walther's niece and nephew, which was illegal. The mother was kept in prison for a time, thanks to the Walther brothers. She is the mother of the Walther/Fuerbringer brides.

Walther left early to escape arrest warrants for the kidnapping. Mrs. Buenger was also involved in the Walther-led riot against Bishop Stephan. The Missouri devotionals lie about Stephan's adultery being discovered suddenly in a confession and acted up with great haste and bravery by Ferdinand. Zion on the Mississippi concedes that everyone knew Stephan was an adulterer in Europe. The bishop brought his mistress over, but not his wife and children (except his healthy son). The big riot was not caused by adultery exposed but by an outbreak of syphilis in the Saxon group.

Ludwig wrote two books about the origins of the LCMS, but skipped over the first years. He did reveal that the valuable chalice used at Uncle Ferdinand's congregation was a personal gift to Bishop Stephan. That means Walther gloried in using a stolen chalice for Holy Communion. Of course, Missouri denies this fact, but there it is in Fuerbringer's book.

On the basis of a four-year degree from Leipzig, Walther made himself the one and only theologian of Synodical Conference, the Field Marshal of the Lutheran Church of North America. Everyone had to agree with his rationalistic-Pietistic opinions. America was so far gone into the Olde Church Growth Movement (revivalism) that Walther seemed Lutheran to many, in comparison. Many good things were done by the Missouri Synod to advance Luther and Lutheran theology, but it was not as glorious as people pretend.

Walther kept Lutherans apart by denouncing everyone outside his franchise as false teachers. He broke up the Old Synodical Conference, driving away many different groups instead of allowing unifying discussions.

---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Walther the Divider":

Walther kept Lutherans apart by denouncing everyone outside his franchise as false teachers. He broke up the Old Synodical Conference, driving away many different groups instead of allowing unifying discussions

This is typical of a cultic person. He persecuted those who did not agree with him and bad mouthed them. People did not agree with him because he was wrong but rather than admitting and receiving the correction, he branded those who corrected him as false teachers. He had prided himself as the champion of pure doctrine. This is what a cultic person does.

You know how I have believed that he was responsible for the fragmentation of American Lutheranism.

He was given too much power by his people and he was a legend in his own mind.

LPC

***

GJ - Yes, Dr. Cruz. You can see the Walther template at work among the Unsteady Lutherans. An ELCA trained "Lutheran" writes from the Roman Catholic college where he teaches religion, and he declares, "Do not listen to Meyer and Jackson."

Walther was ruthless from the beginning. His unethical, bizarre behavior began with the kidnapping of his niece and nephew from his father's parsonage. He involved his future mother-in-law in the felonies, and she was put in prison. But Mrs. Buenger was not allowed to sail with the Saxons because that might have hurt their image. One can imagine their image. They were attacked in the press at home and in St. Louis.

Walther resigned his call when he left for America, but he still called himself the pastor of that parish when he pledged obedience to Bishop Stephan and again, when he forced Stephan out with a riot five months later. A man is not the pastor of that church when he has resigned his call. Walther was not a Waltherian.

Walther defrauded the bishop by stealing back the landed given to Stephan. That was another felony. He changed the title while secretly plotting to remove Stephan, using the Buenger family once again. Did he confront the bishop? No, he avoided the bishop, although the cover story was that he suddenly knew about the adultery from a confession offered up by two women. The defense of his action is even more perverted than violating the seal of the confessional. He did not violate any confidentiality because "everyone knew Stephan was an adulterer." I suppose leaving Europe with a mistress and without a wife was one clue. Perhaps Stephan's trial and house arrest in Dresden were additional clues. Living with his mistress at the spa, in the same room? Late night walks with young ladies? Cell group meetings in odd places? Groups in Dresden and in St. Louis?

Walther took over leadership of the Saxons at the Altenburg debate and by accepting his brother's congregational call after his co-felon died. Both happened at about the same time.

Walther's ruthlessness and dishonesty have been duplicated many times over by Synodical Conference leaders. Lying is considered good management. Bullying people and threatening pastors is considered good form, especially when overlooking the gross immorality of special pals and big donors.


Monday, January 16, 2012

Walther and Slavery - Another Inconvenient Fact

Stephan's hat probably represents Herrnhut.


bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Complete Rough Draft of Chapter Four - Luther vers...":

About Walther and slavery, a topic that  some are studying. The Moravian mission sites that Herrnhut set up around the world, especially in the Caribbean, used slaves to make a profit and set up more Moravian mission sites.

With Stephan being a former Hernnhuter, he had no problem setting up shop in southern Missouri. Sparsely populated Perry Co. had 150 slaves, I recall reading, when the Saxons arrived there. The census information is online, but I think one can find that info on Perry Co history pages. By contrast, the Scandinavian immigrants to America were specifically warned not to settle in the South or anywhere there was slavery. Hence, Norwegians are found in northern tier states mainly.

***

GJ - Perry County also had mineral springs, so Stephan could continue treatment for his syphilis.

The Swedish Augustana Synod loathed slavery and voted Republican.

Here is Cascione's amen corner for everything Walther ever thought, including slavery.

More Walther and slavery.

---

Norman Teigen, Walther, Slavery:


Norman Teigen says:
September 30, 2011 at 6:02 pm
Thank you for posting this very interesting discussion. I had no technical problems.

I have always admired Walther but in the past year or so I have become quite troubled with Walther and the issue of slavery. I believe that the historical record shows that Walther was a southern partisan. I think that the evidence is pretty solid on this point.

There were lots of southern partisans, of course, and one shouldn’t be too hard on these followers of the cause that was lost. What is troubling to me is how Walther justified slavery on an argument based on his interpretation of Scripture, an argument which I feel does not stand so much on Lutheranism as it does on culture.

Walther’s argument on slavery closely follows the standard Southern defense of the institution. Walther’s argument that he only cares about Scripture and not about civil matters seems to cloud the picture rather than clarify.

Walther’s influence on other Lutherans was profound as the professors discuss. I am of the Norwegian branch of Lutheranism and my spiritual ancestors sought advice from Walther on the topic of slavery. Unfortunately, in my opinion, the Norwegians accepted Walther’s views on the subject rather than the better advice which they received from theologians in Oslo. The Waltherian view caused, I think the historical record will show, great sorrow within the Norwegian branch of the faith.

The theological battles of the Civil War, as Professor Mark Noll has written, were settled by the two eminent theologians Ulysses Simpson Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman. What has prevailed, I think, is that Walther’s explanation of the slavery question is the biblically based, solidly Lutheran explanation.

I think that that question is open to serious discussion and I would like to hear from the professors about this over-all issue of the slavery problem and Walther’s explanation. I won’t ask the professors to resolve our Norwegian interpretations of these historical events but would like a clarification of the slavery problem.

Incidentally, the Missouri Synod is still getting beaten up on slavery in recent days as a writer demonstrated earlier this summer in a local paper, The Metro Lutheran.

Thank you,

Norman Teigen
Hopkins MN

---

Norman Teigen has left a new comment on your post "Walther and Slavery - Another Inconvenient Fact":

Thanks, GJ, for posting this. This comes from the Concordia Seminary site. I was pleased in this exchange to have a seminary professor there acknowledge that Walther was wrong on slavery. This admission was encouraging to me because it was the first time that a reliable source had admitted that. I think that one can admire Walther's contribution to the faith and admit that he was once wrong about something.

My interest is in the ideas involved. I have not been able to further my Walther studies this Fall because I ran a campaign for election to the Hopkins MN City Council. I was unsuccessful - no Boss Teigen here, just Ten Percent Teigen-and now I can renew my studies.

I will concentrate on Walther's assertion that slavery is a civil matter and has nothing to do with spiritual matters. This is the essence of the Walther slavery problem and I am reasonably sure that my explanation will be on target.

I will submit it to you and your readers for review and comment. I had a blog once but it was officially shut down. Now the ban was been lifted but I am slow to get the blog going again.

---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Walther and Slavery - Another Inconvenient Fact":

Cascione wrote: "Walther shows that the American slave masters could hardly claim they were following the Bible."

Ha! That's a bunch of historical revisionism. Walther claimed that slavery was biblical, and that abolitionists were wrong when they condemned slavery. Walther clearly taught that only the abuses associated with slavery ought to be condemned, not slavery itself.

People argued against Walther's assertion by saying the abuses were intrinsically bound up with slavery itself, so even if Walther were right, he still ought to condemn slavery itself. Walther, however, chose to believe that abuses of slaves were not widespread, a total myth that abolitionists tried to dispel.

Besides that, almost as soon as Christianity took over the Roman empire, at least widespread slavery was a dead institution, so other Christians were 1300 years ahead of the caveman Walther on that point.

---

bruce-church (https://bruce-church.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Walther and Slavery - Another Inconvenient Fact":

Norm Tiegen, If you really want to know why Walther was pro-slavery, it all comes down the inherent antinomianism of UOJ. Walther thought, "So what if there are widespread abuses inherent in slavery, since all that is forgiven." It's similar to how Stephan's abuses of his office were no no concern since they figured he was forgiven before his was born for those sins, and what's all-important is he's carrying out his duties as cleric:

In Forster's Zion of the Mississippi one can read:

...anything which promised to discredit him before the people or even to rid them of him was accepted without further scrutiny. Their attitude in Germany had been typified by Keyl's remark noted above, that he did not believe in the assertions against Stephan to be true, but that if they were, he was certain Stephan had repented, and all was well (pp. 394-5).

---

LPC has left a new comment on your post "Walther and Slavery - Another Inconvenient Fact":

Walther's theological contribution? The promotion of quasi universalism?
I began being cynical of Walther when I read his essays on Lutheranism. Like a typical cult leader he believed his own propaganda. It is high time that he gets put on the scale and out of the pedestal. It is time to see how he weighs.

LPC

***

GJ - Walther created many needless splits by making his own opinions the ruling norm for all Lutherans. He won in this sense - at first the General Council taught justification by faith and the Means of Grace. Now ELCA is just as UOJ as the Olde Synodical Conference.

The Lutheran Reformers would have laughed at a bachelor's degree from Leipzig qualifying Walther to judge and condemn everyone else. Herrnhut cell groupies are not exactly the Concordists brought back to life, even if the terminology was borrowed for every LCMS institution.

Sunday, January 15, 2012

For the Choir




The Myth
The Truth

Martin Stephan was an orthodox Lutheran
He was a Pietist who managed cell groups.

Walther was an orthodox Lutheran
Walther, a Pietist, joined Stephan’s cell groups. They were all Pietists.

Nothing was wrong with kidnapping children.
Walther had to run from police warrants, and Mrs. Buenger was imprisoned.

No one knew Stephan was an adulterer.
Stephan was under house arrest just before leaving for America. Everyone knew.

Stephan was a false teacher.
All the clergy, including Walther, pledged their loyalty and obedience to the bishop.

Loeber and Walther were shocked to find out Stephan was an adulterer.
Stephan left his ailing wife and  children in Dresden, brought his mistress to America.

Stephan left the Society in shambles.
Robbing Stephan of his land, gold, library, and personal effects bailed them out.

Stephan had eczema and other mysterious symptoms.
Stephan was a syphilitic, whose symptoms were treated in Europe. The disease broke out anew in America. The latency period was over.

The chalice belonged to the Society.
The chalice was a personal gift to Stephan.

The noble Walther rescued the Society with his brave, Biblical, Lutheran approach.
Walther took advantage of the situation which he helped create, and benefited from the crisis.

Concordia Historical Institute
LCMS Myth Machine – even though they possess the actual documentation.


Saturday, January 7, 2012

Revised and Expanded - More Details about the Syphilitic Founder of the LCMS,
Martin Stephan, And His Enabler
C. F. W. Walther


The story about learning of Stephan's adultery through a confession or two -
pure baloney - and admitted in Zion on the Mississippi.
The Mormon saga is more factual than the LCMS myth.

Chapter 4 – Stephan’s Halle Pietism Became Walther’s UOJ


            The official history of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod is full of deliberate, bald-faced lies about its origin. Central to the deception is the C. F. W. Walther mythology, tales and claims that portray him as the American Luther, when he was really the American Pope, a treacherous and criminal usurper, a divisive figure who forced his imprint upon the Synodical Conference. The often-told story is familiar to most conservative Lutherans. The Saxon immigrants came over to America with Bishop Stephan leading them. They suddenly discovered he was an adulterer and forced him out, with the brave and noble Walther taking over and leading them until his death. Although Stephan is always called a false teacher and Walther a champion of Lutheran orthodoxy, with details too murky to decipher, the truth is unsettling.
            Many will portray the facts about Walther as a personal attack, but the truth needs to come out, to set the so-called conservative Lutherans free from the yoke of synod worship and Walther mythology. For too long the statements of Walther have been used to define Scriptural interpretation. His writings have usurped the Book of Concord in the same way that he usurped the position of the bishop he swore to support, the documents he swore to follow in case of a dispute. Walther also set up minions who would repeat his opinions post-mortem until they were established as canon law, best exemplified in the position of UOJ in the Synodical Conference today.[1]

Martin Stephan’s Saga, Pietism and Syphilis


            Martin Stephan had a difficult early life, due to the effects of Roman Catholic persecution of Protestants, which prepared him for future hardships and the leadership of a Pietistic congregation.[2] He was born in Moravia in 1777, and Moravia was a center of Pietism. His pastoral sponsor was a Pietist, and so were his parents. He had to get by on his own for years, but he enrolled at Halle University for two years, 1804-06 “Although the University of Halle was no longer a center of pietism, it remained alive among some students even though rationalism was dominant.”[3]
He finished at Leipzig in 1809, the disruption in his schooling caused by the Napoleonic wars.
He served one congregation for a year and began his ministry at St. John’s in Dresden in 1810.
            St. John’s was a Pietistic congregation with a special charter to continue cell groups or conventicles when they had become suspect. The land for the church came from Count Zinzendorf, one of the superstars of Lutheran Pietism.[4] Stephan gloried in his cell groups, which are the essence of Pietism.[5]
Stephan was not a rationalist. At the time, the two major parties were the rationalists and Pietists. Since the Pietists emphasized Bible study and prayer, they attracted those who found no solace in human reason. Thus anyone who mentioned faith was accused of being a Pietist or a mystic.
Unfortunately, cell group leaders often become bewitched by their power over others. Stephan was unusually successful and well known. In court, testimony from his another woman stated that “among all those who followed Stephan there was the idea that if you entrusted  your spirit to him [Stephan] then you could also give him your body without committing a sin.”[6] Although some of his troubles came from his position as a successful Pietist, his other trials came from his immoral behavior. Accusations came at an early date in his ministry.
The book about Martin Stephan is honest about his problems with adultery, providing a considerable amount of evidence, which was known long before Stephan led 700 people to America “in pursuit of religious freedom.” He obviously wanted more than religious freedom, because he took his mistress, Louise Guenther, and his healthy son to America and left his wife at home – with all the sick children. The society paid for Stephan’s family to travel together to America, but he left them at home. Oddly, that son became the patriarch of some leading LCMS pastors, including one Lutheran Hour speaker, a singular honor.
Even in this age of hedonism, Stephan’s liberties were outrageous and well known. He was often caught taking evening walks with various women. He was investigated by the justice system numerous times. He installed a young woman in the parsonage attic and told his long-suffering wife it was none of her business – he was the master of the house.[7] When he took the cure at the spa, his mistress Louise lived with him. When his wife came to help, she was sent away and walked 20 miles home. The spa and the walks were excused because of his health, but why did he suffer so many chronic complaints?
Martin Stephan suffered from syphilis. He gave it to his wife, and passed it on to some of his children. Syphilis is the great pretender, mimicking one disorder and then another. A sore may appear at the first outbreak, but it goes away, giving false hopes of a cure. The carrier is still contagious even if his symptoms are difficult to discern at any given moment. Anyone with questions about this disorder should consult a physician and read the extensive information (with photos) on the Net. Reading the Stephan book and the Web sources will lead readers to an obvious conclusion.
Previous researchers have come to the same conclusion, but no one wants to admit that Walther and the other pioneers of Missouri Synod followed an obvious adulterer and covert syphilitic to America. The evidence demands this conclusion:
  • Primary syphilis erupts with one or more lesions, painless and non-itchy, which go away in about three months. Stephan could have contracted the disorder and passed it to his wife while thinking (or hoping) it was nothing, once the initial lesion went away.
  • Secondary syphilis shows itself with rashes, a major problem for Stephan. The rashes made him go for long evening walks and visit the spa for its comforting waters. Syphilitic rashes are very ugly indeed.  The disease attacks various organs, including the liver, brain, eyes and heart. The disease may become latent without treatment, with the rashes going away. The latent period can last many years. Modern medical sources do not agree about the syphilitic being contagious during that time, tempting the person to be careless.
  • Tertiary syphilis means obvious neurological and cardiac problems, possible open sores in various parts of the body and on the skin. These lesions are hideous.
  • Congenital syphilis is passed from the pregnant mother to the unborn child. Stephan’s wife was sickly and died before he did. Three of their daughters were deaf and had to be institutionalized. Deafness is one symptom of congenital syphilis. Newborns have many obvious symptoms, perhaps another reason for Stephan to leave his innocent children behind – their deformed bodies were a tragic testimony to his misdeeds.[8]
  • Stephan was quite ill before leaving for America. He was also ill during most of the voyage.
  • The violence of the upheaval against Stephan is not explained by a sudden revelation of adultery by two women, one of them his long-standing mistress, Louise. Historians concede that the colonists did not need to violate the confessional. Instead, it was likely the spread of syphilis in the colony that enraged the men and justified everyone in their violence and criminal actions. [9]
  • Stephan’s subsequent decline after sleeping outside one night is another indication of his STD. Exposure would have lowered his fragile immune system and brought on the symptoms with new force. Louise Guenther, moved to Illinois to live with him and help him recover. He did not live much longer.
There must be evidence of the disease in the official record.
            Celestine was the first of three daughters born deaf, and all three were eventually placed in an institution.  The first boy named Martin died at the age of three weeks, the cause not known. A set of twin girls died at the age of six months, in 1831, no cause given. Two daughters grew up and were married, one of them dying young in childbirth.[10] The profoundly deaf daughters probably had congenital syphilis. Perhaps the three who died in infancy were also afflicted.
The father’s symptoms are illuminating. Stephan “suffered particularly from eczema and some kind of liver ailment, especially after 1832 when another set of twins died.”[11] Although the author does not attribute the problems of the children and the “eczema,” the cluster of symptoms certain points to syphilis. He used the nearby baths to soothe his rashes. His mistress Louise Guenther came to spa to help him and wrap his legs daily. His wife and daughters visited him but did not stay there. Louise did. The same woman helped him when he was cast out of the Perry County experiment and forced at gunpoint to cross to Illinois.
Stephan also took evening walks, accompanied by various people. Court records called them the equivalent of groupies. His behavior with various women on these evening walks was the subject of investigation before the great migration to America. He was doubly suspected of conventicle and immoral behavior. The earliest accusation of adultery was 1814, although this seems to have been dismissed or finessed away.[12]
Stephan’s evening walks and stay-overs at inns were also the subject of official investigation and ecclesiastical dismay in 1836.[13] Stephan ignored the obvious problems raised by abnormal behavior and irregular church practices. Like many successful pastors, he seemed immune to charges and oblivious to the damage he was doing. His long-suffering wife Julia testified in 1838 that Martin lived with Louis Guenther at the spa and the vineyard inn. “At present he has disassociated himself from me completely, and although I have offered him my hand in peace and consolation, my efforts in this regard have been in vain.”[14] Julia also testified that Martin installed a young woman named Sophie in the attic, persisting when Julia threw her out and locked the attic. He broke the lock and invited the girl back. The attorneys Marbach and Krause, and a few friends, knew about Julia’s testimony, so the leaders willingly left for America with an adulterous Pietist. Even if many did not know the full extent of Stephan’s promiscuity, his adoption of Louise Guenther as a substitute wife would have been clear to anyone. Julia Stephan’s testimony has been available since 1937, according to Philip Stephan, so the continued myth-making of the Missouri Synod is difficult to excuse.[15]
Stephan was still under investigation and under house arrest before the Dresden group left for America in early 1838.[16] The charges were suddenly dismissed and he was free to go with his groupies. Since the official charges and testimonies included the names of various women and situations, no one could honestly claim that Stephan’s adultery was suddenly and shockingly discovered after a particularly effect sermon. The lawyers Marbach and Krause knew what the testimony was; Marbach and Vehse also helped in kidnapping the niece and nephew of C. F. W. Walther. The Saxon immigration was not so much in pursuit of religious freedom as it was a flight from justice, with the two famous leaders – Stephan and Walther - both involved in criminal activities.
           

C. F. W. Walther the Pietist


            C. F. W. Walther took control from a power-mad, adulterous false teacher—who made himself a bishop— and instituted an era of Lutheran orthodoxy combined with congregational autonomy. That deception is the foundational Missouri Synod myth. The facts contradict this fantasy, which continues to be told to the gullible when they visit the Shrine of the Immaculate Synod in Perry County, Missouri.
            Walther was the opposite of Martin Stephan in many ways. Stephan struggled to survive, after losing his parents and escaping from Roman Catholic persecution. He found work as a weaver, enrolled as a student at Halle University, but found his education broken up by war. Stephan’s early life is shrouded in mystery because of those hardships, but it is known that he lacked the complete classical education of Walther, the son of a pastor.
            Both men identified with Pietism, but this was the late stage of that movement, when rationalism had already taken over Halle University. George Christian Knapp was considered a leftover Pietist when he taught at Halle, but he claimed the Trinity was a post-Biblical development! Tholuck, the mentor of Adolph Hoenecke, confessed that he was a Universalist.  Both professors prove that the remaining conservative side of Halle was midway to consistent Unitarian-Universalist rationalism. The clergy were dominated by rationalist leaders who considered faith to be a sign of Pietism or mysticism, their two derogatory labels for conservatives.  Those who were more conservative felt persecuted, which led to migration to America.
            Walther earned his degree at Leipzig, which was thoroughly rationalistic. His conservatism made it difficult to win approval from the examining board, but his father’s position as a pastor helped him overcome that obstacle. Walther moved among Pietists because he was one. Unfortunately, his guru put him and others through grueling self-denial, leaving him almost dead. He heard about Martin Stephan’s gentle, compassionate leadership and contacted him. Stephan did not practice the same severe kind of Pietism, so his initial letter of consolation brought great relief to the future leader of the Missouri Synod. Walther admitted that Stephan saved his life. Thus Walther and his older brother were drawn into the Stephan circle in Dresden.
            Cell groups are not merely central to Pietism – they are Pietism. Spener borrowed the concept from a Reformed leader, Labadie, who had been Roman Catholic. Those familiar with Roman Catholic devotional circles can recognize the similarity in emotional intensity and subjectivism: praying for hours, repeating the same mantras, and experiencing mystical ecstasy.[17]  Walther moved from the harsher Pietism to Stephan’s milder form. Stephan took great joy in his cell group ministry. The great migration took cell groups to Perry County and St. Louis. Undoubtedly Stephan’s grip on his subordinate ministers came from his spiritual dominance through the cell groups. The senior cell group guru knows the secrets and creates a powerful dependency in his subjects.[18] Lesser cell group leaders also have an inordinate influence over the lives of their charges. Some attribute Walther’s dictatorial attitude and need to control to his German culture. His spiritual birth and re-birth in Pietism probably contributed even more to this dynamic. The dates and activities of the Society show that Walther simply took over control of the group by breaking all the rules he agreed to follow, doing so with deliberate deceit and unprecedented guile.

Kidnapping Two Children from His Father’s Home


            With the help of attorneys Marbach and Vehse, and the connivance of his future mother-in-law, Walther and his brother (another pastor in the group) kidnapped their niece and nephew from their father’s parsonage – while their father was deathly ill. The official Missouri Synod excuse, repeated at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, is: “The niece and nephew wanted to go to America.” Both children later died in America, perhaps without seeing their grandfather again. Even if this unrecorded childish wish were true, that would not justify breaking the law, because the grandparents were the legal, court-appointed guardians. Kinship kidnapping makes a mockery of the law, which is why arrest warrants were issued for Walther. His future mother-in-law (Buenger) was arrested and interrogated, because Walther used her to hide the children. The attorneys Marbach and Vehse also helped in hiding the children and getting them to America. Like Jonah, Walther jumped an early ship and wasted money to get out of town fast.[19] His appointed ship was lost with all lives aboard in an ocean storm, crossing the Atlantic. That fact has fueled the ludicrous LCMS claim that God graciously spared the life of Walther to fulfill His great plans for the Missouri Synod.
In fact, many of the most famous names involved in the migration were lawless fugitives: Martin Stephan, C. F. W. Walther, O. H. Walther, the Buenger family, Vehse, and Marbach. The state authorities and church faithful might have been happy and relieved to see them leave the country.
            The entire Saxon migration was well thought out and thoroughly organized. Their plans and regulations were established and printed. Other groups might have collapsed and scattered during the twin crises of house arrest (Stephan) and kidnapping (Walther). The only document left to sign was created and supported on the trip across. Landing in the Bay of New Orleans, the leaders gathered and voted for Martin Stephan as their bishop, which was announced January 14, 1839. Although C. F. W. Walther had resigned his position, he still signed as the “pastor of Brauersdorf.” His brother used a different wording – former pastor. On May 31, 1939, Bishop Stephan was:
  • accused,
  • threatened with bodily harm,
  • robbed of his money, extensive library, bedding, clothing, chalice, land,
  • forced across the river at gunpoint,
  • and left at a forlorn cabin with $100 and a few meager tools.
Walther was the leader of the revolt and the myth-creator. When the turmoil was over, he was the new bishop, but without the title. He was everything: in publishing, in teaching, in running the synod, in controlling the ministerium, and in Lutheran synodical politics. He became the American Pope

From Here to Rosebud: Syphilis Exposed


            Philip G. Stephan made a valid point in his book - the Saxon migration suffered from the same leadership crisis that many experienced in organized groups coming to America. Clergy and lawyers were prohibited from the New Ulm, Minnesota group because both professions were too divisive.  As reasonable as the theory seems, the events were far too explosive to be explained by sociology. Epidemiology is the most reasonable explanation. Stephan had an eye for unmarried women, and the leaders knew it.
            The curtain of myth in Zion on the Mississippi slips down to the floor in one admission, where the author conceded that Stephan was up to his old tricks in St. Louis – the same ones he employed in Germany. His female groupies were even more shameless in hanging around his abode. That was bound to attract attention and a possible necktie party in St. Louis. The society was already being lambasted in Europe and America by various periodicals. At first the pastors defended their leader. Soon they changed their tune.
            According to the hagiographers, Pastor Loerber gave such a good sermon on one particular Sunday that two women confessed their adultery to him after the service. One woman was Louise Guenther. The other name is not clearly known.
            Like many synodical cover-ups, this one is full of holes. A casual examination of Stephan’s antics in Dresden, recorded by ecclesiastic authorities and the courts, witnessed by many, shows him to be already known as a promiscuous adulterer. At least one reveals that Walther and Loerber did not violate the confidentiality of the confessional, because the adultery was already known! That is not much of a defense, because it means they all willingly followed an adulterer, a man who abandoned his sick wife and family, and they pledged their allegiance to him as a bishop.
            What changed? In Pursuit of Religious Freedom states that Stephan was quite ill before they left for America. “quotation here” He was also accused of being lazy and not preaching during the ocean voyage.
The most likely change was the period of latency being over just as they came to America. If he were contagious, or far more contagious, an outbreak of syphilis among the tight-knit group would have been explosive and alarming, especially in light of the attacks on them abroad and in St. Louis. The leaders changed from defending him to threatening his life. Syphilitic daughters would do that to anyone. I have confirmation that this information is well known among a few people. The loyalty to Walther was more likely based on his cover story and sparing so many from the shame Stephan brought to their families. Walther took the lead in providing a modified, limited hang-out (a Nixon era phrase), casting all the guilt upon one man, sparing the great enterprise and the reputations of its soiled doves.






[1] The Synodical Conference officially broke up, but the three synods work together with the ELCA through Thrivent. Their dramatic loss of members and the decline of their schools will soon force some type of merger, although it may be dressed up in different clothes.
[2] Philip G. Stephan, In Pursuit of Religious Freedom, 2008, p. 25f (hereafter cited as IPRF). Martin’s parents died while he was a teen-ager. He and his sister fled home because of Roman Catholic oppression.
[3] IPRF, p. 32.
[4] Zinzendorf’s furtive trip to America (under a false name) caused Lutherans to send Henry M. Muhlenberg to America (from Halle) to serve them in 1741. Zinzendorf, who gave us the “Come Lord Jesus” table grace and two hymns, was controversial but also extremely influential. He was a bridge to Wesley and Methodism, a major influence on the pioneers of the Swedish Augustana Synod.
[5] Cell groups are Pietism, just as yoga exercises are Hinduism. The cell group is the real church, according to Pietists, a rejection of the Means of Grace. “There is also a family oral tradition about the hat drawn in the seal. It was believed that the hat represented the hat that Martin used when he preached. This preaching hat may have represented Herrnhut, which translated into English means ‘the hat of the Lord.’ Herrnhut was always an important place in the Pietist tradition. It was in Herrnhut where two families of Moravian Brethren came to live on the estate of Nicholas Ludwig, called Count von Zinzendorf. The count donated the land for their community that grew and then they built a church on the donated property that was near Dresden…Zinzendorf was born in 1790 only seventy miles from Dresden. He had a profound influence on the ‘awakening’ movement, on Pastor Stephan, and on the Bohemian founders of St. John’s Church in Dresden.”
#31, IPRF. p. 64.
[6] IPRF, p. 105. These records have been available since 1986 at the Concordia Historical Institute, where Dan Preus and Paul McCain have been directors. #18, ibid, p. 109.
[7] His wife kicked the girl out and locked the attic, keeping the key. Stephan broke the lock and re-installed the girl. Sad to say, many church officials imagine they also have the same rights and duties today, and their clergy pals look the other way.
[8] Hutchinson's triad is a common pattern of presentation for congenital syphilis. It consists of:  1. Interstitial keratitis, 2. Hutchinson incisors, 3. Eighth nerve deafness. Hutchinson's triad is named after Sir Jonathan Hutchinson (1828-1913). http://classictriads.com/hutchinsons-triad
[9] The neurological damage might have made Stephan less capable of dealing with the incredible tensions around him. At least one writer seemed puzzled that someone once so aware found himself uninformed and unaware. On the voyage across the ocean he was accused of doing little work. He also gave a severely critical sermon against his shipmates. Although exhaustion and depression might be understandable at that point, the symptoms also fit his STD.
[10] IPRF, p. 41f.
[11] IPRF, p. 79.
[12] IPRF, p. 82f. Philip Stephan is willing to believe the best about the bishop, but he is also frank about the many recorded situations with women.
[13] IPRF, p. 86.
[14] IPRF, p. 92f.
[15] IPRF, p. 94.
[16] IPRF, p. 102.
[17] Lay cell group leaders soon adopt the posture of being ordained pastors, or even apostles, especially when they are women usurping authority from men. They are eager to destroy anything that gets in the way of their honor, power, and perks.
[18] The struggling new synod kept cell groups for a period of time. Cell groups rose up with a shout again in recent times because the liberal and unionistic leadership chose to unwrap a covert Pietism which never left the Missouri Synod.
[19] Herman Melville’s preacher makes much of this fact, that “Jonah paid the fare” when he grabbed the ship sailing to the farthest corner of the globe, away from Nineveh. A guilt-free passenger would have dickered over the price. KJV Jonah 1:3 But Jonah rose up to flee unto Tarshish from the presence of the LORD, and went down to Joppa; and he found a ship going to Tarshish: so he paid the fare thereof, and went down into it, to go with them unto Tarshish from the presence of the LORD.