On LutherQueasy - Rolf Preus, D.D. (Doctor of Dogma) Exommunicated His Father, Quensted, Luther, St. Paul, and Jesus

My favorite quotations against Rolf's Justification without Faith are from his father's Justification and Rome, a book he failed to mention in his North Dakota Fracking Lectures. He wowed them in Williston, but the Judgment Seat is a different venue altogether.

Rolf Preus fulminating on LutherQueasy:

"Denying...objective justification [is a] heterodox position, not to be tolerated in the church of God, much less excused and defended...To deny objective justification is intolerable. Anyone who denies...objective justification...is heterodox and should be marked and avoided according to Romans 16:17..."

Quensted:
"The immediate effect of faith is the remission of sins, adoption, justification."
Thelogica-Didactico-Polemico, 4:286, cited in Carl E. Braaten, Justification, The Article by Which the Church Stands or Falls, p 33.

Is it not enough to weary Missouri, Rolf? Must you also weary the saints of old, who clearly taught with Paul and Jesus - Justification by Faith.

The blind guides of Missouri, WELS, the Little Sect, and the CLC (sic) have energized my attention to their errors and the remedies to their falsehoods.

Another Q - Quenstedt - On Divine Revelation. This Q Is Rumored To Be Alec Satin, Prolific Publisher of Lutheran Classics

-Q- Quenstedt Bible source of peace

source: Schmid. _Doctrinal Theology_

---

 

Further (I, 36): 

"Divine revelation is the first and the last source of sacred Theology, beyond which theological discussion among Christians dare not proceed. For every doubt concerning religion in the mind of a true Christian is removed by divine revelation, and by this the faith of the believer grows so strong, and is so firmly established, that it frees his mind from all fear and suspicion of deception, and imparts to him a firm assurance."

Will Timothy Schmeling, PhD, Concordia St. Louis, Help the ELS with Calov and Quenstedt on Justification by Faith?

Timothy Schmeling, portrait courtesy J. C. Penney

Some of his publications:

“Abraham Calov (1612–86): The Prussian on the Cathedra Lutheri.” In Lives and Writings of the Great Fathers of the Lutheran Church, edited by Timothy Schmeling. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2016.

 “Johann Andreas Quenstedt (1617–88): The Consensus Builder.” In Lives and Writings of the Great Fathers of the Lutheran Church, edited by Timothy Schmeling. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2016.

Timothy Schmeling will be installed at Bethany Lutheran College and has already published on Calov and Quenstedt. Bethany has a tradition of the least qualified teaching at the seminary, the better qualified at the college.

If Timothy agrees with Calov and Quenstedt, then he disagrees with Pope John the Malefactor and David Jay Iago Webber. One cannot have Justification without Faith and Justification by Faith in the same stall. That would be unionism. The great and wise in the WELS only  teach Justification without Faith, as do the ever-increasing tribe of Preus. As soon as a Preus is in seminary, he starts railing against Luther's doctrine, the Chief Article.

Let's do a little graphical research and see about where the old boys stand.

 Calov is quoted and cited by Dr. Robert Preus, who graduated
from Bethany Lutheran Seminary before most of the guys (like Moldstand) bothered to do so.
Unfortunately, some of the ELS guys (like Gaylin Schmeling)
attended Northwestern College (RIP), where criminal hazing was
administered with a hanger.

 Quenstedt lays out the real issues,
so I find it impossible to believe that young Schmeling has missed
this on Ichabod. Everyone in the ELS reads and dreads this blog -
so I have heard.

WHERE DOES THIS EASTER ABSOLUTION SILLINESS COME FROM?

Oh - now I get it. Halle University promoted the Easter absolution of the entire world.
And Bishop Martin Stephan, STD, caught it from Halle.
And CFW Walther caught it from Stephan,
which made the mob, the threats,
the robbery, and kidnapping of the bishop easier to execute.
And the Synodical Conference caught UOJ
rom Walther and F. Pieper.
And Muhlenberg learned his Pietism at Halle.
And so did Hoenecke.
And that, history fans, is why WELS-ELS-LCMS leaders work
so well with ELCA leaders. They all came from Halle, more or less,
and they all study at Fuller, if you waterboard them a few hours.

Read Quensteadt Slowly - Do Not Move Your Lips - And Then Write a Reflection Paper on This Citation Proving UOJ.For Extra Credit - Why Did Dr. Robert Preus Quote This in His Last Book?

Rev. David R. Boisclair (Drboisclair) Advanced Member Username: Drboisclair Post Number: 518 Registered: 1-2002	Posted on Friday, March 28, 2014 - 8:52 am:       My contribution for the morning: ELDoNA/Jackson's doctrine of Justification is a false and blasphemous doctrine in so far as it denies the biblical doctrine of Objective Justification. It denies the true Gospel. That is in response to Brett Meyer's final word in his latest post. [GJ - You and ELCA agree, Dave.]
Dave Schumacher (Lex) Advanced Member Username: Lex Post Number: 808 Registered: 6-2003	Posted on Friday, March 28, 2014 - 9:58 am:       Check this out: https://www.christiancourier.com/articles/1512-did -christ-literally-bear-our-sins-on-the-cross Brett, Jackson, and Rydecki must be getting their theology from this Wayne Jackson guy. [GJ - Put the cap back on the glue, Dave.]
Dave Schumacher (Lex) Advanced Member Username: Lex Post Number: 809 Registered: 6-2003	Posted on Friday, March 28, 2014 - 10:05 am:       Brett, When you confer with Jackson on the Luther quotes I provide see if you guys can't come up with a better argument than "this is a poor choice of words" or "this is unsubstantiated". Jackson knows that Luther wrote this. He doesn't agree with it, but he can't say that. Instead, he has to make up lame arguments. But what Luther wrote, he wrote, and you can be assured that he meant it. He was right too. Brett, you and Jackson are at odds with the Scriptures, the BOC, and Luther. [GJ - Dave, Dave. Close the lid now.]
Joe Krohn (Jester) Intermediate Member Username: Jekster Post Number: 232 Registered: 4-2011	Posted on Friday, March 28, 2014 - 11:17 am:       I am going to follow Pr. Boisclair's lead and leave this discussion. If Brett Meyer doesn't get it after all this time, he never will. @ Brett #186 The passages you quote prior to Romans 4:16 are in reference to the elect and what God chooses to do to them post foreknowledge of them. Your idea of what Romans 4:16 means is wrong and you do not follow the sound pattern of words. You have been counselled on this repeatedly. "...of faith...by grace." It is always grace first. There can be no faith without grace first. Furthermore, the passage states that the promise is extended to all men and that the reality of the promise is not predicated on faith, but grace. This is Lutheranism 101, Brett Meyer. This my last correspondence regarding Justification with anyone in the Jackson/ELDoNA camp. I really should have been doing other things. [GJ - Joe, it is not a discussion if the Queasies just rant like people in a locked ward.]