Which Predestination: Reformed or Lutheran by Lenski and Stellhorn - Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry – "Faithful to the Reformation"

 Stellhorn came over with the Stephan sex cult, but he parted ways with Walther over Objective/Subjective Justification.

Download the E-book

PDF

Kindle

Early Kindles

EPUB (Apple, Kobo)

Which Predestination: Reformed or Lutheran by Lenski and Stellhorn - Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry – 



"Faithful to the Reformation": "
Contents (35 pages)
Introduction to the Original [1892] Edition
1 What Is Predestination?
2 What Has God Regarded In Election?
3 What Is The Relation Especially Of Faith To Election?
4 In What Sense Does The Formula Of Concord Speak Of Election?
5 Is Man’s Conversion And Salvation In Every Sense Independent Of His Conduct?
6 May We Speak Of Man’s Decision Or “Self-determination” In Conversion?
7 What Is The Difference Between The Lutheran And The Reformed Doctrine Of Election?
8 How Must The Doctrine Of The Dogmaticians Of The Seventeenth Century Be Regarded?
9 How Is The Doctrine Of Modern Missouri To Be Regarded?
For further reading…
About the Lutheran Library Publishing Ministry
Download the E-book

Download the E-book

PDF

Kindle

Early Kindles

EPUB (Apple, Kobo)"

'via Blog this'

***
GJ - John Sparky Brenner admitted in print that Walther's Election without Grace dogma was really another version of Justification without Faith. Of course, Brenner would not use traditional Lutheran wording - Justification by Faith. He calls the precious dogma of forgiveness and salvation without faith as ---- The Justification of the World, perhaps a far better way to camoflage the false dogma so dearly loved by Halle University, ELCA, Rambach, Stephan, Walther, and JP Meyer.

Someone who translated Walther had me read one of Walther's books, which I reviewed. I am reasonably certain the translation was good. The theology of Walther was bad - and like his latter day disciple Waldo Werning - self-referential. "For additional information, read the superb essay written by...me."

Paul speaks of imputation (counting) only through faith in Romans 4, following Genesis 15, but JP Meyer knew better. Who can disagree with JP? He taught in WELS for 50 years, making him infallible.

The Error of Modern Missouri - Arguing from the Confessions rather than from Walther

The Error of Modern Missouri

Its Inception, Development and Refutation

Authored by Friedrich A Schmidt, Frederick W Stellhorn
Introduction by Conrad H L Schuette, Richard C H Lenksi
Contributions by H A Allwardt, H Ernst
Edited by George H Schodde
Translated by C B Ghodes, W E Tressel, Richard C H Lenski
Edition: 1

This volume, first printed in 1897, was occasioned by the 1880s schism in American Lutheranism. It presents three lengthy treatises on the subject of predestination defending the mainstream Lutheran "intuitu fidei" (Latin: in view of faith) perspective over against a revived deterministic view held by some Lutherans.

The Missouri Synod headed by CFW Walther believed the Bible taught an absolute "single election", which is Augustine's deterministic (and some say, fatalistic) view, but only affecting the saints, a view held by some theologians early in the Reformation.

The Ohio Synod believed the Bible taught an election that preserved some of man's responsibility and freedom in matters of salvation, whether they be saved or damned (Lutheran Scholasticism's view since the 1600s). Using his foreknowledge, God identified and elected those who naturally would resist at times, but would overall cooperate willingly with God's Gospel grace, and have faith at the end of their mortal lives. In other words, none are saved against their will.

F. W. Stellhorn

The first treatise, by Dr. F. W. Stellhorn (translated from the German by R.C.H. Lenski), has three parts: 1) a dogmatic-historical introduction, 2) what the Formula of Concord and the Old Lutheran theologians say, and 3) a debunking the Missouri Synod's doctrine called the election of grace.

The second treatise is by Dr. F.A. Schmidt, titled "Intuitu Fidei." It is translated by Lenski and C.B. Ghodes. Its three parts are: 1) explicating the doctrine of "intuitu fidei," 2) whether the Old Lutheran theologians departed from the Lutheran confessions when they taught "intuitu fidei," and 3) whether "intuitu fidei" is taught in the Book of Concord.

The third treatise is a testimony against the false doctrine of predestination recently introduced by the Missouri Synod, translated by Lenski and W.E. Tressel. The treatise begins with theses prepared by H.A. Allwardt and Prof. H. Ernst, and a discussion of those theses by pastors who left the Missouri Synod over that doctrine. Appended is a history of controversy by H. A. Allward.

Yes, there is another copy out there, even a free one in parts but -

Most monitors or tablets don't have great  resolution, so reading 802 pages on them can be a bear. If you don't wear glasses, you will after reading 802 pages on a kindle or tablet. The book however has print that's as sharp as a tack because printers print out at high resolution - often 1200 dpi.

If one is going to read a lot of pages of anything and make notes and underline, a book is the only way to go. At $20, that's only 2.5 cents a page, which is cheaper than printing it out at home. The print in the proof is surprisingly sharp, better than in the library original it was scanned from, since the letters are darker and the pages whiter.

***

GJ - Fox Valley called this Inuitu Fidei, the Faith of the Eskimo, a funny reflection on their reactionary opposition to anything against the Great Walther, not to mention their obsession with pretending to know something.

I confess to never reading this entire book, but it is a classic benchmark in the history of the LCMS. I would rather start with St. Paul, the Reformation leaders, Concordists, and post-Concordists, but the LCMS-ELS-WELS grows misty-eyed about the Good Olde Synodical Conference. 

Stellhorn came over with the Perryville sex cult, so we can see that a division developed.

As I understand it, Lenski's family was pushed out by Waltherian fundamentalists.

Walther referred doubters to his own work, but this one has hundreds of quotations from the European Lutherans, who were real scholars, not just college graduates like Stephan's disciple and disciplinarian.

This book is a bargain, so it is well worth  buying for those who want to study the history. We know that the LCMS and tourist sites deceive everyone about the sex cult origin of their synod. This is, at the very least, another look at the original debates by those who took part in them.

Walther himself was a bully who had to have things his way. Missouri was keen on driving away anyone who disagreed with Walther, as the CFW sycophants took over. They lost the Lenski family and a universally acknowledged New Testament scholar. They divided Lutherdom, which is now united around justification without faith - a sad, tragic victory for Stephan's waterboy.

The Error of Modern Missouri

The Error of Modern Missouri is available at this Dropbox link.

Stellhorn did not kidnap anyone in Europe or America, so we know he was a heretic.

The pseudo-Lutherans will start crying out because I linked the book, but do not worry - they never read it. And they never will.

If something is not from the Walther School of Cult Wizardry, it is suspect to them.