Friday, March 29, 2013

Good Friday, 2013.

Norma Boeckler


Good Friday Vespers, 2013, 7 PM Central Time


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Worship, 7 PM Central Time

The Hymn # 172                 O Sacred Head            2:55
The Order of Vespers                                             p. 41
The Psalmody                   Psalm 22                    p. 128
The Lections                         

The Sermon Hymn #143            O Dearest Jesus  2:56  

The Sermon –     Bearing Our Sins
 
The Prayers
The Lord’s Prayer
The Collect for Grace                                           p. 45

The Hymn #151               Christ the Life            2:78

Isaiah 52:13 Behold, my servant shall deal prudently, he shall be exalted and extolled, and be very high.  14 As many were astonied at thee; his visage was so marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men:  15 So shall he sprinkle many nations; the kings shall shut their mouths at him: for that which had not been told them shall they see; and that which they had not heard shall they consider.

53:1 Who hath believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the LORD revealed?  2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.  3 He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.  4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.  5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.  6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.  7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.

8 He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken.  9 And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.  10 Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand. 

11 He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities.  12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.

KJV John 19:1 Then Pilate therefore took Jesus, and scourged him. 2 And the soldiers platted a crown of thorns, and put it on his head, and they put on him a purple robe, 3 And said, Hail, King of the Jews! and they smote him with their hands. 4 Pilate therefore went forth again, and saith unto them, Behold, I bring him forth to you, that ye may know that I find no fault in him.

5 Then came Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe. And Pilate saith unto them, Behold the man! 6 When the chief priests therefore and officers saw him, they cried out, saying, Crucify him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Take ye him, and crucify him: for I find no fault in him. 7 The Jews answered him, We have a law, and by our law he ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God. 8 When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he was the more afraid; 9 And went again into the judgment hall, and saith unto Jesus, Whence art thou? But Jesus gave him no answer.

10 Then saith Pilate unto him, Speakest thou not unto me? knowest thou not that I have power to crucify thee, and have power to release thee? 11 Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin. 12 And from thenceforth Pilate sought to release him: but the Jews cried out, saying, If thou let this man go, thou art not Caesar's friend: whosoever maketh himself a king speaketh against Caesar. 13 When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he brought Jesus forth, and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called the Pavement, but in the Hebrew, Gabbatha.

14 And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King! 15 But they cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar. 16 Then delivered he him therefore unto them to be crucified. And they took Jesus, and led him away. 17 And he bearing his cross went forth into a place called the place of a skull, which is called in the Hebrew Golgotha: 18 Where they crucified him, and two other with him, on either side one, and Jesus in the midst. 19 And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross. And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS. 20 This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin. 21 Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews. 22 Pilate answered, What I have written I have written.

23 Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments, and made four parts, to every soldier a part; and also his coat: now the coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout. 24 They said therefore among themselves, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be: that the scripture might be fulfilled, which saith, They parted my raiment among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots. These things therefore the soldiers did. 25 Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene. 26 When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son! 27 Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.

28 After this, Jesus knowing that all things were now accomplished, that the scripture might be fulfilled, saith, I thirst. 29 Now there was set a vessel full of vinegar: and they filled a spunge with vinegar, and put it upon hyssop, and put it to his mouth. 30 When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost. 31 The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away.

32 Then came the soldiers, and brake the legs of the first, and of the other which was crucified with him. 33 But when they came to Jesus, and saw that he was dead already, they brake not his legs: 34 But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water. 35 And he that saw it bare record, and his record is true: and he knoweth that he saith true, that ye might believe. 36 For these things were done, that the scripture should be fulfilled, A bone of him shall not be broken. 37 And again another scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced.

38 And after this Joseph of Arimathaea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly for fear of the Jews, besought Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus: and Pilate gave him leave. He came therefore, and took the body of Jesus. 39 And there came also Nicodemus, which at the first came to Jesus by night, and brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about an hundred pound weight. 40 Then took they the body of Jesus, and wound it in linen clothes with the spices, as the manner of the Jews is to bury. 41 Now in the place where he was crucified there was a garden; and in the garden a new sepulchre, wherein was never man yet laid. 42 There laid they Jesus therefore because of the Jews' preparation day; for the sepulchre was nigh at hand.

For Holy Communion Preparation on Easter Sunday
O Lord Jesus Christ, we thank Thee, that of Thine infinite mercy Thou hast instituted this Thy sacrament, in which we eat Thy body and drink Thy blood: Grant us, we beseech Thee, by Thy Holy Spirit, that we may not receive this gift unworthily, but that we may confess our sins, remember Thine agony and death, believe the forgiveness of sin, and day by day grow in faith and love, until we obtain eternal salvation through Thee, who livest and reignest with the Father and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.


Norma Boeckler

Bearing Our Sins


One statement is often used to explain that everyone is the world has been forgiven and saved, “Behold the Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world.”

KJV John 1:29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.

Luther treated this extensively in his commentary on Galatians, which is commended to all readers of the Book of Concord as their guide to justification by faith.

The point Luther makes is often lost on those who cannot grasp the efficacy of the Word or the Means of Grace. The Gospel is this very fact – that Jesus took on Himself the sins of the world.

Every single form of punishment dealt to Him should be seen as part of bearing our individual sins, taking on the penalty for our sin.

A parallel explanation is “bearing the sins of the world.” This is not a logical puzzle for man to solve with his human reason. It does not mean that bearing the sins is the same as universal grace, universal forgiveness, universal salvation. Those who think this way become Universalists and then atheists.

Instead the cross is all grace, all forgiveness – that is – Christ is all grace and forgiveness. But this forgiveness, according to God’s wisdom, is distributed in one way only – through the Word of God, the message of the Gospel.

Strangely, many people talk about the Word of God but they do not want to teach the Gospel contained there. They have their own opinions, which fascinate them no end. They are like the banker who thought everyone should have citrus and ginger each day. He brought it around to people and insisted that they have their citrus and ginger – but only one citrus. (Birmingham, Our Crowd). He went to one a second time by mistake, and then said, “You already had yours,” and took it away. Why this was good for everyone is impossible to tell at this date, but it was vital to him.

So people get accustomed to the simple truths of the Gospel and invent something essential that they foist on everyone.

But this message of Isaiah and John is compelling for one particular reason, and that is vital for each person to hear.

When all the punishments and forms of torture are numbered –
  • Spitting
  • Hitting
  • Mocking
  • Whipping to the bone
  • Carrying the cross
  • Nailing to the cross
  • Lifting up the cross for a slow suffocation death
  • Cry of dereliction –

They point to one thing – those individual sins of ours are indeed paid for. We should not dwell on what the Romans did, what the religious opponents did, or what the followers failed to do.

We should meditate on what Christ did wash away our sins, to give us grace through this Means of Grace – the Gospel.

The largest part of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John is the Way of the Cross, the last few days of Jesus’ public ministry.

The central message of Paul is Christ crucified.

That is the Gospel. If it means pointing out dearly He paid for our sins, then it also makes clear how they are completely taken away among believers.

Unbelievers have no grasp of this. The apostates make fun of the atonement. So do atheists. Two ELCA professors, still alive, are considered the greatest Lutheran theologians today. Both of them (Braaten, Jenson) joined in mocking the crucifixion in their giant dogmatics book (two volumes!). Why does WELS and Missouri work with them? The reasons are obvious. The apostasy of ELCA does not matter, except to prove how superior other sects are.

It does matter a great deal whether we believe the Word of God or not. Trust is everything. Our lives are based upon trust and promises. When I walk our wonder dog Sassy, she trusts my word. If I say “stay” she stands next to me until I let her walk again. If I say “come back” she immediately returns. If she sneaks into a neighbor’s backyard to explore, I say “GIT over here” and she comes back with a grin for having a little fun sniffing around. She trusts that I love her and care for her safety.

When we talk about going out, she walks into her little box and waits for her treat. She always gets something. She tries to get seconds too.

I find it odd that people would say, “Christ suffered all this, but no one needs to believe in Him. They are still righteous. They have been forgiven, saved, period. End of story.” (DP Buchholz)

To say faith does not matter turns the Gospel into a lie, because John’s Gospel was written, as he said, so that people would have faith, and in believing, have eternal life in His Name.

It also corrupts the meaning of faith as trust. Faith is not the same as virtue or human willpower or a decision, because God creates it through the Word of the Gospel.

Here is the comfort of the Gospel – believing is forgiveness. How does one believe? By hearing the Gospel, because the Holy Spirit is always at work in the Gospel.

How doe we know this is true? Two ways – One is our own experience in growing more confident in God through hearing the Gospel. Another is opposition – as soon as the Gospel gains a foothold, there is demonic opposition to it. Every possible fault is found, so much that people are disturbed by the conflict and made uncertain. These disturbances are good because they separate the good from the bad.

The crucifixion of Christ is the most disturbing, perplexing story of world religion. Back then and even now, people ask, “How can this be, that my sins are forgiven freely and completely, if I believe in Him and confess Him with my mouth?” And yet, this is the one and only religion of grace.

God gives instead of receiving from man.

God is gracious and forgiving rather than being demanding.

God forgives instead of condemning.

Norma Boeckler


Good Friday Quotations
 
"Thus, we know how and where the Holy Spirit is to be found, and we need not be in doubt nor waver, gazing here and there for special revelations or illuminations.  Each one should hold to the Word, and should know that through it alone, and through no other means, does the Spirit enlighten hearts and is He ready to dwell in them and to give true knowledge and comfort through faith in Christ."   
          Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids:  Baker Book House, 1983, III,  p. 300. 

Not for Us To Judge Results

"Be not worried because of this! for even though a man preach and continue in the Gospel for many years, he must still lament and say:  Aye, no one will come, and all continue in their former state.  Therefore you must not let that grieve or terrify you."      
          Sermons of Martin Luther, II, p. 305. Easter Tuesday Luke 24:36‑47.       

"But when St. Peter stood up and preached, they made a mockery of it and considered the apostles drunken fools.  When they had urged the Gospel a long time, they gathered together three thousand men and women.  But what were they among so many?  Yea, no one could discern that the Gospel had accomplished anything, for all things continued in the same state as before.  No change was seen, and scarcely anyone knew that there were Christians there.  And so it will be at all times."
          Sermons of Martin Luther, II, p. 306. Easter Tuesday Luke 24:36‑47.     

God Builds with the Word

"The Word and the gifts of the Holy Spirit are materials with which He builds. Though the dwelling is not altogether completed, yet through His grace and love it is accepted of God."
          Sermons of Martin Luther, III,  p. 322. 

Only the Word

"Secondly, it is shown here that this Word precedes, or must be spoken beforehand, and that afterwards the Holy Spirit works through the Word.  One must not reverse the order and dream of a Holy Spirit who works without the Word and before the Word, but one who comes with and through the Word and goes no farther than the Word goes."
           Sermons of Martin Luther, III, p. 329. 

Norma Boeckler


Easter Sunday Art from Norma Boeckler


Thursday, March 28, 2013

How Many Church and Changers Have Quit Their WELS Cult Group?
Ecclesia Augustana: A Valediction to Ecclesia Augustana






Ecclesia Augustana: A Valediction to Ecclesia Augustana:

Who We Are

Ecclesia Augustana is a lay-led Confessional Lutheran blog dedicated to examining the doctrine and practice of the Lutheran Church, especially in the United States.

Current Authors:
Christian Schulz; All posts here
Daniel Baker; All posts here
Bryan Lidtke; All posts here
Dagan Siepert; All posts here

Former Authors:
David Porth; All posts here
Benjamin Rusch; All posts here



A Valediction to Ecclesia Augustana

I wrote in my previous post on my "encouragement" that I am willing to be corrected or instructed. Here I hope to make good on that statement.

That post was my revealing of a weak argument against me -- one that bent around a fairly elementary logical fallacy (guilt by association), one that felt slick with legalism, and was enforced argumentum ad consequentiam (an appeal to positive or negative consequences.) I'm not ashamed of what I wrote. But contrary to certain outside opinions going wild on this incident, this was not coercion or bullying. The episode stemmed from genuine concern about my present and future ministry, and I will repeat here one more time, I am genuinely grateful for that concern. Nevertheless, I wish such an episode of guilt-heaping (i.e. guilting and not even using God's Law to do so properly) shouldn't exist in the Lutheran church.

Since then, after much prayer, I have come to believe that I ought to retract my authorship here. To my co-authors, I'd like to give my sincere praise. It shows great spiritual maturity to be so interested and public about Lutheran dogma. This is a rare gem to see in the youth, and I wouldn't want this enthusiasm quashed. But I would also exhort these acquaintances to "watch their life and doctrine closely," particularly in what they choose to opine in public, and especially when using sensationalist words. Wise Solomon wrote in Ecclesiastes 10Dead flies make a perfumer’s oil ferment and stink; so a little folly outweighs wisdom and honor.

I am rescinding my author status and disassociating with the blog "Ecclesia Augustana".

What, now, may happen to me? If my mere association here was so grave, will my past collaboration with these Ecclesia Augustana authors unnecessarily and unrighteously haunt me into the future? I pray no. If indeed I am promised "all is forgiven," I urge: don't later revoke or make hypothetical God’s own absolution. C.F.W. Walther says about forgiveness of sins:
"If the pastor strongly doubts the repentance and sincerity of a person confessing to him, without, however, being able to convict him of it and refuse absolution, [the pastor] dare not salve his own conscience by adding all sorts of conditions, or even warnings and threats, to the absolution." (Pastorale, p. 164. Emphasis mine)



'via Blog this'



---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "How Many Church and Changers Have Quit Their WELS ...":

Benjamin Rusch, "...such an episode of guilt-heaping...

I believe that is a sufficient description of bullying.

Interesting that Benjamin equates giving a bold public statement (and in the case of his former Ecclesia acquaintances - faithful Christian confessions concerning the chief article of Christ's doctrine - Justification) to dead flies making oil ferment and stink.

What a shame.

Then he's embraced by Tarheel Paul who himself praised August Pieper for taking to task Lutherans quoting at length the faithful statements of the Lutheran Confessions, Luther, Gerhard, Chemnitz, Hunnius etc. etc. When the fruit of August's Pietism peaked with this heinous statement in the third volume of the Quartalschrift , "But whoever molests the doctrine of justification stabs the
gospel in the heart ...even if he ever so much emphasizes justification by faith." (as quoted by unChristian Pastor Nathan Seiltz (W)ELS in defense of teaching the laities children the false gospel of forgiveness without faith.)

***

GJ - Bullying is standard behavior for WELS. They are frightened that people will study the issues, think on their own, and act on them.

---

Benjamin Rusch has left a new comment on your post "How Many Church and Changers Have Quit Their WELS ...":

Ah, I'm a bit late to the party...
Good gravy, Mr. Meyer. I thought my post was lucid enough, so I'd like to address your deductions.

I believe that is a sufficient description of bullying.
It's your place to define what bullying means to you. I can't refute that.
I deliberately did not disclose every fact of this episode for obvious ethical reasons. Seeing what I did choose to disclose, I can understand how you came about that determination. Nevertheless, "this was not coercion or bullying" is my reminder to you.

Interesting that Benjamin equates giving a bold public statement (and in the case of his former Ecclesia acquaintances - faithful Christian confessions concerning the chief article of Christ's doctrine - Justification) to dead flies making oil ferment and stink.

Hyper-analyzation. "Equate to"? Did I mention Justification? Did I link to any articles on Justification? Did I even allude to the doctrine of Justification? The folly of sensationalism is the source of dead flies.

As for "giving a bold public statement," read the very same paragraph again. "I wouldn't want this enthusiasm quashed," should suffice as an answer.

***

GJ - True - no one knows all the facts, including the defenestrated. But the question remains - how many Church and Changers were forced to jump ship on their blog? In fact, when WELS was telling people that Church and Change was over, finished, shut down, the wily rodents were registering people for their next conference via a link on the WELS.net website. I had to prove that many times before the link disappeared.

I do not believe the Intrepids were given their own registration link for their conference. Nor were the people who ran Issues in WELS, which included a former DP.

Apostasy is rewarded in WELS. Ask Larry Olson, David Valleskey, Frosty Bivens, Paul Calvin Kelm, Steve Witte, Elton Stroh, Mark and Avoid Jeske, Floyd Luther Stolzenburg, and VP James Huebner.

Justification by faith is punished, but a Day is coming when human judgment means nothing.

This is Luther's answer to WELS/LCMS infatuation with
Management by Objective.

Maundy Thursday and Good Friday Art - by Norma Boeckler




Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Ecclesia Augustana



Ecclesia Augustana:


Wednesday, March 27, 2013


The Elephant in the Room - 2 Corinthians 5:18-21

This is the third in a series of posts that seek to present key passages pertaining to the doctrine of Justification by comparing the statements of contemporary authors with the patristic writings of the the Church Catholic. It's by no means exhaustive; if it were, there would be far too many quotations for a simple blog post. But I hope it brings to mind a number of important questions: "Why is there so much disconnect? Why do the interpretations of these passages appear to completely contradict and disagree with one another?" (The first and second posts can be found here and here, respectively)


-- Interpretations of 2 Corinthians 5:18-21 by modern sources --



A Brief Statement of the Doctrinal Position of the Missouri Synod (1932)
"Scripture 
teaches 
that 
God 
has 
already 
declared
 the 
whole 
world
 to 
be 
righteous 
in 
Christ, 
Rom.
5:19; 
2
Cor. 
5:18‐21;
 Rom.
4:25." (http://www.lcms.org/page.aspx?pid=415)




Francis Pieper
"God no longer looks upon sinful man with wrath, but 'before His divine tribunal' forgives the sins of mankind, does not impute their trespasses unto them (2 Cor. 5:19). 'By the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life' (Rom. 5:18). And this reconciliation is, as has been shown, complete and perfect, extensively and intensively, for we certainly have no right to restrict the meaning of of either the terms 'world' (2 Cor. 5:19) and 'all men' (Rom. 5:18) or the terms 'not imputing their trespasses' (2 Cor. 5:19) and 'justification' (Rom. 5:18). Nor do these passages speak merely of a new relation between God and man, but they state definitely that God’s action produced the new relation, God’s action in not imputing their sins unto men, in forgiving them their sins, in justifying men in His heart, this is the meaning of objective reconciliation, as taught in 2 Cor. 5:19, Rom. 5:18; 5:10; 4:25. CHRISTIAN DOGMATICS, by Francis Pieper, Volume 2, pages 398 & 399



Siegbert Becker
"Paul’s actual words say that God was reconciling the world to Himself not counting their sins against them. The only possible antecedent of “their” in that sentence is “the world,” and the world certainly includes all men. What Paul actually says, therefore, is that God does not count the sins of all men against them. In his letter to the Romans the apostle indicates beyond question that not to count a man’s sin against him means to forgive his sin. Paul writes, “Blessed are they whose transgressions are forgiven, whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will never count against him.” We are therefore justified in saying that Paul in 2 Corinthians 5:19 teaches that in Christ God has indeed forgiven the sins of the whole world. God reconciled the world to Himself by forgiving the sins of all men." (www.wlsessays.net/files/BeckerUniversal.rtf)


J.P. Meyer

"Objectively speaking, without any reference to an individual sinner's attitude toward Christ's sacrifice, purely on the basis of God's verdict, every sinner, whether he knows about it or not, whether he believes it or not, has received the status of a saint. What will be his reaction when he is informed about this turn of events? Will he accept, or will he decline?"
J. P. Meyer, Ministers of Christ, A Commentary on the Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, Milwaukee: Northwestern Publishing House, 1963, p. 103f. 2 Corinthians 5:18-21.


John Moldstad Jr.
“When Paul uses the word ‘reconciling’ here, [2 Corinthians 5:19] he clearly means that forgiveness of sins is really imputed to ‘the world.’"
Lutheran Sentinel, October, 1996, p. 11



--Interpretations of 2 Corinthians 5:18-21 in the writings of the Orthodox Lutheran Fathers--


The Wittenberg Faculty Writing against Huber's "Universal Justification"
“Never does Paul teach universal justification. For as far as concerns 2 Corinthians 5,the words ‘not imputing their trespasses unto them,’ they are not to be understood universally about all men regardless of faith.
Actorum Huberianorum pars prior. Durch die Württembergischen Theologen Pars posterior, p. 122


Martin Chemnitz
"10 Now this power of forgiving sin must not be understood to have been given to the priests in such a way that God had renounced it for Himself and had simply transferred it to the priests, with the result that in absolution it is not God Himself but the priest who remits sin. For Paul expressly distinguishes between the power and efficacy of reconciliation which belongs to God, and the ministry which was given to the apostles, so that it is God who reconciles the world to Himself (2 Cor. 5:19) and forgives sins (Is. 43:25), not however without means but in and through the ministry of Word and sacrament.

Ministers indeed are said to loose and remit sins on account of the keys, that is, because they have the ministry through which God reconciles the world to Himself and remits sins.
 Thus Paul says (2 Cor. 1:24) that although he has authority, he nevertheless does not lord it over their faith but is a servant and steward of the mysteries of Christ (1 Cor. 4:1), so that he who plants and he who waters is nothing, but He who gives the increase, namely God (1 Cor. 3:7). Nevertheless, he shows that the use of the ministry is useful and necessary, for, says he, we are co-workers, that is, assistants, whose labors God uses in the ministry, but where nevertheless all the efficacy belongs to Him. We are servants, says he, through whom you have believed. Likewise: “I became your father in Christ Jesus through the Gospel” (1 Cor. 4:15). Paul treats this distinction clearest of all in 2 Cor. 5:18–20. It is God who reconciles us to Himself through Christ, not counting our sins against us. To the apostles, however, He gave the ministry of reconciliation. But how so? “He entrusted to us,” says Paul, “the message of reconciliation. So we are ambassadors for Christ, God making His appeal through us. We beseech you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God.”

Thus this distinction honors God and gives Him the glory that properly belongs to Him; it also claims for the ministry the honor and authority it has according to the Word of God. For even as it is Christ who baptizes through the ministry and also imparts His body and blood, so also it is Christ who through the ministry absolves and remits sins.

Chemnitz, M., & Kramer, F. (1999). Vol. 2: Examination of the Council of Trent (electronic ed.) (559–560). St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House. (HT: http://www.faithalonejustifies.com/reconciling-the-world-but-not-without-means/)


Philip Melanchthon
"2 Corinthians 5:19

…not imputing their sins to them.

This demonstrates what the effect is of the reconciliation made by the Son. For since God the Father transferred the sins of us all from us to the Son so that He might pay for us the penalty for sins and in this way reconcile again the offended Father, the eternal Father now does not impute sins to those who believe in His Son; He regards them as righteous on account of the obedience and intercession of His Son. For the righteousness of man which God regards as righteousness is that sins are remitted, are not imputed and are covered, as Paul defines righteousness in Romans 4, citing Psalm 32. Therefore, the effect of reconciliation is that sins are not imputed; instead, the faith that embraces Christ the Reconciler is imputed for righteousness.

And He placed among us, etc.

That is, He instituted the ministry of teaching about the reconciliation made through the death of the Son. For God wants it announced to the entire human race that reconciliation has been made by the Son, so that sins are not imputed to believers; instead, righteousness is imputed to them, and thus believers are saved. For this reason, among the ruins of the empires and so many sects and heresies, God has to this day wondrously preserved this ministry, and will continue to preserve it until the end of the world and the advent of His Son, as Paul says, “You shall announce the death of the Lord until He comes.”

(http://www.faithalonejustifies.com/philip-melanchthon-on-2-corinthians-519/)


St. Augustine
He says this, of course, of the whole Church, which, by itself, He frequently also calls by the name of the world: as when it is said, God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself. 2 Corinthians 5:19...But that world which God is in Christ reconciling unto Himself, which is saved by Christ, and has all its sins freely pardoned by Christ, has been chosen out of the world that is hostile, condemned, and defiled.
Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, Vol. 7. Edited by Philip Schaff. (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1888.) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight. <http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1701087.htm>.


'via Blog this'

---

Hindus are all justified too.
And saved - ask DP Buchholz.


Christian Schulz has left a new comment on your post "Ecclesia Augustana":

I added this quote after I published it just so ya'll know:

Edward Preuss:
So, then, we are reconciled (2 Cor. 5:18); however, not only we, but also Hindus, and Hottentots and Kafirs, yes, the world (2 Cor. 5:19). “Reconciled,” says our translation; the Greek original says: “placed in the right relation to God.” Because before the Fall we, together with the whole creation, were in the right relation to God, therefore Scripture teaches that Christ, through His death, restored all things to the former right relation to God. We, then, are redeemed from the guilt of sin; the wrath of God is appeased; all creation is again under the bright rays of Mercy, as in the beginning; yeah, in Christ, we were justified before we were even born. For do not the Scriptures say: “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them” (2 Cor. 5:19)? This is not the justification which we receive by faith, but the one which took place before all faith."
(The Justification of the Sinner Before God)

Help Retrieve Pastor Kevin Hastings' Personal Property from St. John Lutheran Church, Milwaukee - Stolen by Two Men, WELS, and a Law Firm



Get the word out! In order to protect the personal property of Pastor Hastings it has been advised to retrieve it all now. As unfortunate as this measure is..things have to now be done with legalities in mind. We need helpers. After our Easter Service we will proceed to the church and parsonage to load it up. We will need the following. A 16 foot Uhaul. Boxes. A storage location would be awesome. We have an alternate if need be. So if you come to our Easter service. Consider helping pack up books and furniture or bring a box. At a minimum you can come and see what it looks like when Satan has attacked the church.

With your continued support, when we win, I will call you all back to move it back in!

Lutheran Statements about Christian Doctrine





















Justification by Faith Graphics, Continued
































The Christian Message: Upgraded topical message: Rejecting the Resurrection Reality

The Christian Message: Upgraded topical message: Rejecting the Resurrection Reality:



The Christian Message has upgraded the following message with additional pics, captions, internal links and minor editing:

Rejecting the Resurrection Reality 

Excerpt:

Easter morning, a couple of years ago, I posted on the local online forum 3 words – “He is risen!” My father taught me this declaration every Easter morning. He would declare: “He is risen!” And then he would expect the following reply: “He is risen, indeed!” Such was the declaration and response of the early Christians every year commemorating the death and resurrection of the Christ of history.

One forum personality responded, like the early Christian response. However, there was another response that stated, “Where?” His, was a declaration of unbelief, basically saying [Paraphrase]: “I don’t see anything.” I then posted the following reply: ............. Continued:

Please note:  For the whole topical message, please access it at its originating source:

Rejecting the Resurrection Reality - thechristianmessage.org/2011/04/

Also note: "The Christian Message" subject listing of topical messages

'via Blog this'


Paul Paul Rydecki, Gary Cepak, Christian Schulz, Brett Meyer - And Hunnius

Kidnappers and syphilitic adulterers like UOJ.

Aegidius Hunnius has a brilliant section in A Clear Explanation of the Controversy among the Wittenberg Theologians concerning Samuel Huber’s misuse of Romans 5 to prove that all those who have been condemned through Adam’s sin have also been justified by Christ’s obedience (whether they believe in Him or not).

Hunnius takes apart Huber’s (and the official WELS) doctrine piece by piece, concluding with this observation about Huber’s supposed “confessional subscription” to the Lutheran Book of Concord:

And what will Dr. Huber reply to the Book of Concord, which, in citing these very words from Romans, explicitly confirms that those things mean nothing other than that we are justified by faith? This is what the Book of Concord says in the Latin edition, page 666: “Therefore, these statements are equivalent and clearly mean the same thing, when Paul says that we are justified by faith; or that faith is imputed to us for righteousness; and when he teaches that we are justified by the obedience of one Mediator, who is Christ; or that through the righteousness of one man, justification of life comes upon all men. For faith does not justify on account of this, that it is such a good work, or that it is such a splendid virtue, but because it apprehends and embraces the merit of Christ in the promise of the Gospel.” Thus far the Book of Concord.  If the Pauline phrase (that “through the righteousness of one Man, justification of life comes upon all men”) clearly means the same thing as that other statement, “We are justified by faith” (as the Book of Concord clearly and emphatically asserts), then the interpretation is rejected by the sentence of the Book of Concord that imagines from these words of Paul a justification apart from faith—one that extends also to those who have never had faith and never will. Dr. Luther says it even better in [his lectures on] the second chapter to the Galatians: “Where Christ and faith are not present, there is no remission of sins, no refuge, nothing but pure imputation of sins and condemnation.”


http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2013/03/a-hunnius-on-truly-confessional.html

Christian Schulz said...
Seems pretty cut and dry. I thought other explanations and quotes from Hunnius and the Wittenberg faculty/Lutheran Church were good enough, but the opponents always twist and wiggle out of them, or so they make it. But this is pretty cut and dry. To say otherwise seems to fly directly in the face of Hunnius, et al and in direct favor of Huber's position/interpretation. 

In addition, it seems as though Hunnius is bound to the interpretations of specific passages within the Lutheran Confessions. In some debates I've been in, I did exactly as Hunnius did by showing how the Confessions interpret the referenced passage, the pastor(s)' response: we're not bound by how the writers of the Confessions may interpret individual passages when they cite them. I almost spit up my drink when I read the Clear Explanation a few weeks ago and Hunnius was doing the same thing I did just years after the Book of Concord was compiled. So it's obvious Hunnius, et al disagree with that notion of "not being bound." I'll stand with them and their justification-only-by-faith interpretation of supposed universal-justification-of-all-sinners-without-faith passages.
Unknown said...
Romans 5:18 sets forth a strong inference based on vv. 15-17. It is interesting to note that in the original Greek, v. 18 is written as a verbless pair of comparative clauses, which is not at all unusual. Any verbal aspect which colors v. 18 must be drawn from the surrounding verses, v.17 and v. 19. v. 17 uses a 3rd person plural aorist active indicative verb, "ebasileusen, reigned," in its protasis; v. 17's apodosis uses the same vocable, but as a 3rd person future active indicative, "basileusosin, will reign." v. 17's first verb indicates the completed action of its subject. Thus: "death reigned." v. 17's 2nd verb indicates the contrast, a projected, but not completed action regarding its subjects: "those receiving the abundance of grace and the gift of righteousness."

v. 19 follows the same paradim of verbal tenses and moods, but changes verbal voices: The verbal protasis is 3rd person plural, aorist passive indicative, "katestathesan, were thoroughly established;" while the apodosis is 3rd person plural, future passive indicative, "katastathesontai, will be thoroughly established." Thus v. 19's two parts, respectively, "the many were thoroughly established..., ...the many will be thoroughly established..."

Based on Paul's linguistic pattern in 5:17,19, v. 18's strong comparative inference would follow this set verbal tense paradim: The protasis reflects the aorist verbal aspect of completed action even as its own context makes clear, "...just as through one's transgression, there resulted condemation for all men..."; and the apodosis reflects the future verbal aspect of projected, future action, (most clearly an incomplete action), "...so also through One's justification, there will result justification of life for all men."

The context makes clear the comparison: Adam's transgression effected for many the reign of death (v.17), for all, the abiding fact of condemnation(v.18), and for many, the established status as being sinful based on Adam's disobedience. v.19 by contrast asserts, "even so for many there awaits gracious results purchased by Christ (v.17), for all there awaits justification of life (v.18), and there awaits for many the establishment of their status as just men, based on Christ's obedience.

The technical clarity yielded by the Greek in these verses clearly teaches justification based on Christ's merits alone, a gracious gift intended for all, a gracious gift awaiting many. The overall context of Romans which precedes and follows 5:17-19 makes clear that the attribution of justice by God based on Christ's merits alone is by the agency of faith alone, effected by the Spirit alone. Hunnius correctly cites the Book of Concord when referring to Romans 5:18. Those who oppose this verse can only do so by reading into the context more than it says and allows, or reading out of the context what it clearly, sufficiently, and efficaciously teaches.

In Christ alone,

Gary Cepek
Rev. Paul A. Rydecki said...
Gary,

Those are excellent points. Thank you for highlighting the Greek of those verses. I agree with you on the tenses that ought to be supplied for the ellipses in that verse.

I suspect that another reason why the WELS is pushing so hard for the NIV is that, of all the other options (ESV, Holman, NKJV, etc.), only the NIV really supports the WELS This We Believe statement on justification, with regard to the tenses and the structure of Romans 5:18. The ESV's "leads to" is probably the most difficult translation for the WELS' use of Rom. 5:18 in This We Believe, as it would no longer support their conclusions in that paragraph at all.

NIV: "...so also the result of one act of righteousness was justification that brings life for all men."

ESV: "...so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men."

Holman: "...so also through one righteous act there is life-giving justification for everyone."

NKJV: "...through one Man’s righteous act the free gift came to all men, resulting in justification of life."

Hunnius also gave an interpretation of Romans 5:18 in his Theses Opposed to Huberianism:

This notwithstanding, we most willingly grant that there is a righteousness that avails before God for the entire human race, a righteousness that has been gained and acquired through Christ, so that if the whole world were to believe in Christ, then the whole world would be justified. With respect to this, Paul writes in Romans 5 that “through one man’s justification (δικαίωμα), the gift has spread toward all men for justification (δικαίωσις) of life.” Nevertheless, no one is justified nor does anyone obtain remission of sins from this acquired universal righteousness without the imputation of this acquired righteousness of Christ. But the imputation of righteousness does not take place except through faith. (Thesis 5)
Brett Meyer said...
"I suspect that another reason why the WELS is pushing so hard for the NIV is that, of all the other options (ESV, Holman, NKJV, etc.), only the NIV really supports the WELS This We Believe statement on justification,...

So then the only real issue at the 2013 WELS Convention is the chief article of Christ's doctrine - Justification, and not the manipulated acceptance of the New Age, Methodist, Baptist, RCC, Pentecostal NNIV.

Because it's not the confessed acceptance of the NNIV which separates individuals, churches and synods from Christ - it's the confessed acceptance of a false gospel.

Hunnius was faithful and bold enough to attribute the gospel of UOJ to its chief author in his Theses Opposed To Huberianism. Other faithful Christians should be so bold - and so faithful to do the same, by the grace and mercy of the Triune God.

May the grace and mercy of the Lord Jesus Christ lead the laity to do what the majority of clergy have utterly failed to do - publicly renounce the gospel of Universal Objective Justification for what it is - for what Hunnius so long ago faithfully identified it as, and then boldly confesses, teach and proclaim Christ's one true Gospel of the forgiveness of sins: Justification, righteousness and eternal salvation solely through faith in Christ alone.

The Lord's will be done.

In Christ,
Brett Meyer