Monday, September 2, 2013

Team Glende's Lawsuits - Restraining Orders - Question and Answer

Ski admitted his sexual harassment of this man's wife to DP Doug,
but Engelbrecht has moved heaven and earth to protect
Ski and Glende, to punish any truth-tellers.

Q:   Is a restraining order for me?
As a member of society you and/or your family have the right to feel safe at home, work, and in the community. If someone is violating these rights, you need to take appropriate actions to protect yourself and/or your family. Depending upon your personal situation there are three types of restraining orders that can help protect you: Domestic Abuse, Child Abuse, and Harassment.
Q:  Where do I start?
  • First, you will need to contact an Advocate at the District Attorney's Office in the St. Croix County Government Center located in Hudson, Wisconsin. You may also contact a victim advocate by phone at 715.386.4666. By speaking with an advocate, you will be able to decide the type of petition that fits your situation.
  • Second, you will need to come to the Government center to file your petition. At this time the advocate will help answer any questions you may have and help you in completing the petition. The victim advocate's office is located on the main level, Room 1259, of the Government Center.
  • Third, after completing the petition, the advocate will bring the petition to the Judge for review. During this time, the Judge will decide whether to grant a Temporary Restraining Order.
Basic Definitions
Petitioner - person filing for a Temporary Restraining Order/Injunction
Respondent - the person against whom the petition is being filed
Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) - a restraining order that is in effect for seven days or until the injunction hearing.
Injunction Hearing - a hearing before the Court where it is decided if there has been Domestic Abuse, Child Abuse and/or Harassment. If the court finds that any of these have occurred the court may issue an injunction up to, but not more then, two years.
Domestic Abuse Order - the petitioner and respondent must be family members or household members (people who in the past or now live in the same place), or have a child in common. A domestic abuse restraining order prohibits any contact by the respondent to the petitioner and the respondent must leave the home. Facts needed on the petition for a domestic abuse order include a showing of an intentional infliction or threat to inflict physical pain, physical injury, or illness; intentional impairment of physical condition; or sexual contact or intercourse without consent. There is no filing fee for this order.
Harassment Order - the facts in the petition must show that the respondent struck, shoved, kicked, or otherwise subjected the petitioner to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do so, or that the respondent engages in a course of conduct, or repeatedly commits acts which serve no legitimate purpose. A harassment restraining order prohibits any harassment by the respondent, but cannot force the respondent out of the home nor can it automatically order no contact. There is a filing fee for this order, unless it qualifies under the state statute including a domestic relationship or stalking.
Child Abuse Order - the facts must show that a person under 18 years of age has had physical injury inflicted by other than accidental means or there has been sexual intercourse or sexual contact under Wisconsin Statute 940.225 or 948.02 or there is a violation of sexual exploitation of a child, Wisconsin Statute 948.05, or the abuser has permitted or required a child to violate prostitution statute, § 944.30, or there has been emotional damage as defined in Wisconsin Statute 813.122(1)(e) or there has been a threat to engage in any of the above conduct. The court can order the respondent to avoid the child's residence and to have no contact with the child. There is no filing fee for this order.
Q:  After the TRO, Then What?
  • If a TRO is ordered by the court, a court date will be set for an injunction hearing. The petitioner should then contact law enforcement to have them serve the papers on the respondent. Never give the respondent the legal papers yourself.
  • At the Injunction hearing, as the petitioner, you must appear in court and may bring others/advocates for moral support. Both the petitioner and the respondent have the opportunity to be heard at the injunction hearing. If the facts show domestic abuse, harassment, or child abuse has occurred, the court may issue an injunction for a period of not more than two years. The respondent may or may not be present at the hearing but must be served notification of the hearing.
Q:  Do I Need An Attorney?
No. But, you may wish to hire an attorney or speak to an attorney prior to the hearing.
Q:  Does The Respondent Need An Attorney?
No, however, the respondent may hire an attorney to represent him/her. If so, you may wish to reconsider obtaining legal counsel. A free attorney will not be appointed for the respondent. This is not a criminal proceeding.
Q:  Are There Penalties For Respondents Who Break TRO or Injunction?
A:  Yes.  If the respondent violates the order, once it is in effect, report it to law enforcement immediately and every time. Then the respondent may be arrested for breaking the order and may face criminal charges.
  • The penalties for the violation of domestic abuse and child abuse are imprisonment not to exceed nine months, a fine not to exceed $1,000, or both.
  • The penalties for the violation of harassment orders are imprisonment not to exceed 90 days, a fine not to exceed $1,000, or both.
Practical Points to Remember
  • Respondents may be angry when they receive the temporary restraining order.  Anger most likely will be directed towards you.  Take all the steps necessary to insure your safety.  Have a safety plan for yourself and your child(ren).
  • Petitioners need to be in a position where they can call for help. Law Enforcement will not know when petitioners are in trouble. 911 should be called in an emergency.  Remember to keep the petition with you at all times.
  • The court takes these cases seriously and expects everyone else to take them seriously. The orders are to be enforced by any or all law enforcement officers in and out of the State of Wisconsin.
Conclusion
  • We are concerned for your safety and the safety of your child(ren). These are serious situations and people's lives may be in danger. We recognize this is a difficult step to take, but it is an important step for your safety and for taking control of your life. You should not have to live in fear.
  • Violence should not be accepted as normal behavior. You are not responsible for the behavior of the person who is hurting you. Statistics show that in an abusive relationship, the pattern of behavior tends to get worse and become more violent.
  • Domestic violence is everyone's problem. Many lives are affected and children learn violence from abusers. No one deserves to be abused. Sometimes it is necessary to take action to protect yourself-the restraining order can be one of those steps.
Q:  If I file a restraining order petition, will my abuser know what I said in the petition?
A:  Yes. Before a hearing can be held, at which time the temporary restraining order can be replaced with an injunction which can be in effect for up to two years, the abuser must be served with a copy of the TRO/injunction petition. The respondent has the right to attend the hearing.
Q:  When I get a restraining order, does that mean I have custody of the kids?
A:  No. If you are seeking a domestic abuse restraining order, the court is prohibited from ordering any custody, physical placement or child support orders. A separate action may need to be filed in Family Court. You may need an attorney to assist with issues about custody/physical placement.
Q:  When I get a TRO/injunction, does it mean my abuser has to stay away from the kids also?
A:  The TRO/injunction only restricts the respondent for making contact with you and does not include the children, unless a separate child abuse TRO/injunction order has been filed on behalf of the child(ren). At the injunction heating, custody or physical placement issues may come up. By law, when issuing a domestic abuse TRO or injunction, the court may not address these issues. It is possible for a court to address issues regarding the children at a harassment injunction hearing because the law does not say the court is prohibited from doing so.
  • It is preferable to arrange any exchange of the child(ren) through the party so that there is no direct contact between the two of you. Many abusers use child exchange contacts as an opportunity to abuse the victim. Third party exchanges in public places help to eliminate this.
Q:  Can I get a restraining order for psychological/emotional abuse?
A:  The laws are extremely specific about the types of abuse a person must have been subjected to in order to obtain an injunction. For a person living with someone who is psychologically or emotionally abusive, the mental abuse can be equally, if not more painful, then physical abuse. The domestic abuse restraining order law says the respondent must have engaged in certain physical abuse or the threat of any behavior. If the emotional abuse includes threats, you may be able to get a domestic abuse restraining order. In addition, the domestic abuse restraining order law says if the person may engage in domestic abuse, you can obtain a restraining order.
  • If your abuser engages in a course of action, which harasses and intimidates and serves no legitimate purpose, you may be able to get a harassment restraining order.
Q:  Will I be able to return to my home immediately after I file a TRO?
A:  Sometimes. You will want to make sure the respondent has been served and you would not be in any danger in going home. You can ask for police assistance in doing this, but often the police cannot immediately get to the task of serving the respondent with the restraining order and placing you in possession of your home. You may need to stay someplace else until the police can help you.
Q:  How can I make sure that the TRO/injunction will be enforced?
A:  You are the best enforcer of this order. Every time the abuser makes contact with you, the police (911) should be called immediately. Not calling the police or only occasionally, gives the abuser confusing messages about the validity of the TRO/injunction. The abuser will begin to believe it is all right to have contact sometimes. Also, sometimes officers do not know about or ignore the provisions of the domestic abuse law, which says the order is not void if the petitioner allows contact.
Q:  If we live or work in the same place, how can I be assured of no contact with my abuser?
A:  At the injunction hearing when you are giving testimony, you will want to include any special requests, such as him/her staying away from you at your place of residence or work. If you happen to see each other at either of these places and your abuser does make contact with you, call the police immediately because it would be a violation of the TRO/injunction.
Q:  How do I determine which county I should file in?
A:  A petitioner can file a domestic abuse TRO or injunction in the county she or he is temporarily residing in OR in the county where the respondent lives OR in the county in the county where the incident occurred. A petitioner can file a harassment TRO or injunction in the county where the petitioner lives OR in the county where the respondent lives OR in the county in which the incident occurred.
Q:  Will I void or violate my restraining order by having contact with the respondent?
A:  The law says the respondent is prohibited from initiating direct contact with the petitioner. If the petitioner of a domestic abuse restraining order allows the respondent admittance into her or his home, the restraining order does not become null and void. The police are to enforce any violations of that order. However, if the petitioner continues to initiate contact, the police may believe that she or he is not serious about the injunction. The police can then arrest the petitioner and the prosecutor can charge the petitioner with aiding and abetting the violation of the restraining order.
Q:  Is it possible to get my restraining order extended?
A:  If the injunction is for less than 4 years, the petitioner can get it extended for up to two years from the date it is first entered. The respondent must be notified once the extension is granted.

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Dennis McCarthy: Pam Murphy, widow of actor Audie Murphy, was veterans' friend and advocate

Audie Murphy
http://www.audiemurphy.com/


Dennis McCarthy: Pam Murphy, widow of actor Audie Murphy, was veterans' friend and advocate:


Dennis McCarthy: Pam Murphy, widow of actor Audie Murphy, was veterans' friend and advocate


After Audie died, they all became her boys. Every last one of them.
Any soldier or Marine who walked into the Sepulveda VA hospital and care center in the last 35 years got the VIP treatment from Pam Murphy.
The widow of Audie Murphy – the most decorated soldier in World War II – would walk the hallways with her clipboard in hand making sure her boys got to see a specialist or doctor — STAT. If they didn't, watch out.
Her boys weren't Medal of Honor recipients or movie stars like Audie, but that didn't matter to Pam. They had served their country. That was good enough for her.
She never called a veteran by his first name. It was always "Mister." Respect came with the job.
"Nobody could cut through VA red tape faster than Mrs. Murphy," said veteran Stephen Sherman, speaking for thousands of veterans she befriended over the years.
"Many times I watched her march a veteran who had been waiting more than an hour right into the doctor's office. She was even reprimanded a few times, but it didn't matter to Mrs. Murphy.
"Only her boys mattered. She was our angel."
Last week, Sepulveda VA's angel for the last 35 years died peacefully in her sleep at age 90.
"She was in bed watching the Laker game, took one last breath, and that was it," said Diane Ruiz, who also worked at the VA and cared for Pam in the last years of her life in her Canoga Park apartment.
It was the same apartment Pam moved into soon after Audie died in a plane crash on Memorial Day weekend in 1971.
Audie Murphy died broke, squandering million of dollars on gambling, bad investments, and yes, other women.
"Even with the adultery and desertion at the end, he always remained my hero," Pam told me.
She went from a comfortable ranch-style home in Van Nuys where she raised two sons to a small apartment - taking a clerk's job at the nearby VA to support herself and start paying off her faded movie star husband's debts.
At first, no one knew who she was. Soon, though, word spread through the VA that the nice woman with the clipboard was Audie Murphy's widow.
It was like saying Patton had just walked in the front door. Men with tears in their eyes walked up to her and gave her a hug. "Thank you," they said, over and over.
The first couple of years, I think the hugs were more for Audie's memory as a war hero. The last 30 years, they were for Pam.
She hated the spotlight. One year I asked her to be the focus of a Veteran's Day column for all the work she had done. Pam just shook her head no.
"Honor them, not me," she said, pointing to a group of veterans down the hallway. "They're the ones who deserve it."
The vets disagreed. Mrs. Murphy deserved the accolades, they said.
Incredibly, in 2002, Pam's job was going to be eliminated in budget cuts. She was considered "excess staff."
"I don't think helping cut down on veterans' complaints and showing them the respect they deserve, should be considered excess staff," she told me.
Neither did the veterans. They went ballistic, holding a rally for her outside the VA gates.
Pretty soon, word came down from the top of the VA. Pam Murphy was no longer considered "excess staff." She remained working full time at the VA until 2007 when she was 87.
"The last time she was here was a couple of years ago for the conference we had for homeless veterans," said Becky James, coordinator of the VA's Veterans History Project.
Pam wanted to see if there was anything she could do to help some more of her boys.
Funeral services for Pam Murphy will be held Friday at 2:30 p.m. in the chapel at Forest Lawn, Hollywood Hills, 6300 Forest Lawn Drive, Los Angeles. Dennis McCarthy's column appears Tuesday, Thursday, Friday and Sunday.

Mrs. Audie Murphy.

'via Blog this'

All Things Gay at the 2013 ELCA Churchwide Assembly and Beyond - Exposing the ELCA

All Things Gay at the 2013 ELCA Churchwide Assembly and Beyond - Exposing the ELCA:

 
Matthew 18:6 - "If anyone causes one of these little ones--those who believe in me--to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.

The ELCA will have to answer to God for their wickedness. They continue to encourage Christians who struggle with same-sex attraction to act on their sinful desires. In 2009 the ELCA essentially declared homosexuality good, that it was not sinful but the way God created some people. At the 2013 churchwide assembly the ELCA passed three more memorials centering on homosexuality.

The articles by ReconcilingWorks, a Lutheran LGBT rights organization explain the memorials from their point of view:
  •  Memorial calling for opening dialog across the church about ministering to same-gender couples passed by the 2013 ELCA Churchwide Assembly (read here)

  •  ENDA Memorial calling for a fully inclusive act preventing discrimination on employment passed by the 2013 Churchwide Assembly (read here)

  •  UAFA Memorial calling for comprehensive immigration reform that includes the families of LGBT people passed by the 2013 ELCA Churchwide Assembly(read here)

Also at the 2013 ELCA CW Assembly the newly-elected Presiding Bishop let it be known that she believes the 2009 ELCA homosexuality votes were the right decision (read here) and the man voted to be the Secretary of the ELCA is a vocal advocate for homosexual marriage. (read here)

While we are on this topic check out the letter 3 ELCA Bishops in California wrote affirming the right for ELCA churches to perform gay marriages. Of course ReconcilingWorks applauds the statement. (read here)

The ELCA... leading people deeper into sin.

'via Blog this'

Fourteenth Sunday after Trinity. Luke 17:11-17.
Healing of the Ten Lepers


The Fourteenth Sunday after Trinity, 2013


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn # 292                 Lord Jesus Christ               1:2
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed             p. 22
The Sermon Hymn # 192               Awake My Heart            1:22 

Descriptions of Faith

The Communion Hymn # 480            Lord of the Worlds            1:62
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 511     Jesus Shall Reign                1:80

KJV Galatians 5:16 This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh. 17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would. 18 But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law. 19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, 20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, 21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God. 22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, 23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. 24 And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.

KJV Luke 17:11 And it came to pass, as he went to Jerusalem, that he passed through the midst of Samaria and Galilee. 12 And as he entered into a certain village, there met him ten men that were lepers, which stood afar off: 13 And they lifted up their voices, and said, Jesus, Master, have mercy on us. 14 And when he saw them, he said unto them, Go shew yourselves unto the priests. And it came to pass, that, as they went, they were cleansed. 15 And one of them, when he saw that he was healed, turned back, and with a loud voice glorified God, 16 And fell down on his face at his feet, giving him thanks: and he was a Samaritan. 17 And Jesus answering said, Were there not ten cleansed? but where are the nine? 18 There are not found that returned to give glory to God, save this stranger. 19 And he said unto him, Arise, go thy way: thy faith hath made thee whole.

Fourteenth Sunday After Trinity

Lord God, heavenly Father, who by Thy blessed word and Thy holy baptism hast mercifully cleansed all who believe from the fearful leprosy of sin, and daily dost grant us Thy gracious help in all our need: We beseech Thee so to enlighten our hearts by Thy Holy Spirit, that we may never forget these Thy blessings, but ever live in Thy fear, and, trusting fully in Thy grace, with thankful hearts continually praise and glorify Thee; through Thy Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.


Descriptions of Faith

KJV Luke 17:11 And it came to pass, as he went to Jerusalem, that he passed through the midst of Samaria and Galilee. 12 And as he entered into a certain village, there met him ten men that were lepers, which stood afar off: 13 And they lifted up their voices, and said, Jesus, Master, have mercy on us.


5. In the first place it is a characteristic of faith to presume to trust God’s grace, and it forms a bright vision and refuge in God, doubting nothing it thinks God will have regard for his faith, and not forsake it. For where there is no such vision and confidence, there is no true faith, and there is also no true prayer nor any seeking after God. But where it exists it makes man bold and anxious freely to bring his troubles unto God, and earnestly to pray for help.

This is a miraculous healing where we learn so much about faith and also about thankfulness. Ten lepers heard about the miraculous power of Christ. This report  or sermon or confession of faith by others moved them to ask Jesus for healing.

KJV Romans 10:16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report? [the sermon that was heard) 17 So then faith cometh by hearing [the sermon], and hearing [the sermon] by the Word of God.

In this passage from the Means of Grace chapter in Romans, Paul described the three-fold impact of the Gospel Report. One word is used in a three-fold way, very concisely showing the relationship between the revealed Word of God, the sermon based on the Word of God, and faith created by the Word of God. It is not simply the act of hearing, but hearing the powerful Gospel Word, such as the Healing of the Ten Lepers.

This healing presumes the lepers heard the report and were so filled with trust in Jesus that they faced the mockery and rejection of the crowd to beg him for healing. Nothing is quite so bad as a disfiguring disorder. For some reason we really have trouble looking past the unusual face or skin or features of someone.

Besides this, the lepers were unclean and therefore unwelcome among their own family friends, not to mention strangers.

The lepers bodies are weak, so their voices are small and difficult to hear. So they put together all their weak voices and begged Jesus in faith, as a group.

But true faith does not doubt the good and gracious will of God.

Wherefore its prayer is strong and firm like faith itself. St. Luke does not relate three things of them in vain; first, that they went to meet him; second, they stood; third, they lifted up their voices. By these three things their strong faith is commended and presented to us as an example.

We have laughed over the long-time friends we have met at the oddest times. Chris expects to, so she is on the lookout. She was sure she saw someone on I-80 and so we persisted until the professor stopped the car along the interstate, we greeted each other, and got together at the next rest stop. We saw the same couple at the Mayo Clinic, purely by accident.

We were a bit miffed that we were forced into a new place in downtown Chicago, on a trip. We parked and walked on the sidewalk, only to have Chris say she saw another long-time friend ahead. There was no way to tell in a polite way, so I shouted, “Lenny!” and the Lenny we sought turned around.

The funniest was when I explained carefully that appearing at a seminary in downtown Chicago, without plans, could hardly get us to see another long-lost friend, who had no regular business at that location. Just as I was done with an excellent, reasoned explanation, that same person came walking down the hall toward us.

The best was similar, where Chris wanted to see the doctor who delivered our son. She was the daughter of our friends’ friend in Davenport. Her father was a famous conductor in Chicago. We were at the Kline Biology Tower, a large Yale building for many science doctorates. How could we even look for Hester? or remember what she looked like? And there she was – name tag and all. Chris explained her excitement and Hester hoisted our toddler up in the air. “We didn’t do so badly with this one,” she said.

In each case, not having faith for a good outcome would mean not even trying. Why look for the impossible? Many people do that today. They have no expectation of a good outcome because they trust in human reason alone and not in God.

People explain why they have to remain slaves of their synod and go to their expensive synod schools – “because there is no other choice.” America has been populated by people who risked everything in creaky ships because they trust God would give them a better place to worship in freedom without oppressive bullies.

As Chytraeus explained in his excellent book, it is a sin to question the goodness of God. That means, in faith we see the wisdom and mercy of God – even in the difficult moments of life. After five straight years of decline in the education business, I expected to semi-retire with the help of Social Security. I suddenly found myself needed in a job I prepared to do before the Dark Times – teaching English.

9. Behold this good inclination or comforting trust, or free presumption toward God, or whatever you may call it, in the Scriptures is called Christian faith and a good conscience, which man must have if he desires to be saved. But it is not obtained by human works and precepts, as we shall see in this example, and without such a heart no work is good. Therefore be on your guard, there are many lecturers who want to teach faith and conscience, and know less about them than a common blockhead. [WELS plus the LCMS Seminaries, the ELS and ELCA!] They think it is a sleepy, lazy thing in the soul, that it is enough for the heart to believe that God is God. But here you observe what a thoroughly living and powerful thing faith is. It creates wholly a new heart, a new man, who expects all grace from God. Therefore it urges to walk, to stand, makes bold to cry and pray in every time of trouble.

10. The second characteristic of faith is that it does not desire to know, nor first to be assured whether it is worthy of grace and will be heard, like the doubters, who grasp after God and tempt him. Just as a blind man runs against a wall, so they also plunge against God, and would first gladly feel and be assured that he can not escape out of their hands. The Epistle to the Hebrews says, <581101> 11:1: “Now faith is assurance of things hoped for, a conviction of things not seen.” This clearly means faith holds fast to what it does not see, feel or experience, either in body or soul, but as it has firm trust in God it commits itself to and relies upon it without any doubt but its hope will be realized. Thus it will also certainly be realized, and the feeling and experience will come to it unsought and unsolicited, even in and through such hope or faith.

We cannot call it faith if we imagine we have to qualify for forgiveness. The lepers were in a position to realize that truth. Nothing in their world told them they were deserving of anything, and yet they were filled with faith in the goodness of God and Jesus’ power to heal them.

12. The third characteristic of faith is, that it allows of no merit, will not purchase the grace of God with works, like the doubters and hypocrites do, but brings with it pure unworthiness, clings to and depends wholly on the mere unmerited favor of God, for faith will not tolerate works and merit in its company, so entirely does it surrender, venture and raise itself into the goodness for which it hopes, that for its sake it cannot consider either good works or merit. Yea, it sees that this goodness is so great, that all good works compared with it are nothing but sin. Therefore it finds only unworthiness in self, that it is more worthy of wrath than of grace; and it does this without any dissimulation, for he sees how in reality and in truth it cannot be otherwise 13. These lepers here prove this clearly, who hope for the grace of Christ without the least merit. What good had they ever done to him before? They had never seen him, how then could they have served him? Besides they were lepers, whom he could justly have avoided according to the law, Leviticus 13:1, and kept himself free from them as was just and right.

One of the bizarre characteristics of this age, no different from others, is people buying respect and forgiveness through the visible church. As long as they give princely sums, their store-bought clergy servants proclaim their great goodness, even though there is no evidence of faith or contrition.

Thus the business deal is made. The rich man will ignore Lazarus at the gate so the clergy will praise him. The clergy will ignore Lazarus so they will have more money to spend on themselves – all for the glory of God, of course.

15. Behold, here is a good, real, living and true example of Christian faith, that sufficiently teaches us how we must be disposed if we would find grace, piety and salvation. Now, in addition to this doctrine follows the incentive or inducement to faith, that we should gladly believe as we are at present taught to believe. This incentive, however, consists in that we observe how such faith never fails, that as it believes so it comes to pass, and that it is certainly heard and answered.

So the idea of a bargain or contract is lacking in the Word of God. The believer expects the best of God and will see that accomplished in time. Rather than thinking he is working toward forgiveness and eternal life, he sees God’s grace as additional motivation to trust in all that may happen in the present and future.

What else does this mean than to say: Through me in faith you now have everything that I am and have: I am your own, you are now rich and satisfied through me; for all I do and love I do and love not for my but only for your sake, and I only think how to be useful and helpful to you, and accomplish whatever you need and should have. Therefore consider this example, to do to each other as I have done to you, and only consider how to be useful to your neighbor, and do what is useful and necessary for him.

Your faith has enough in my love and grace; so your love shall also give enough to others.

Luther always emphasized that God provides for all human needs, but for our spiritual needs especially – and those are the most important. When we worry too much about daily needs we also forget about our neighbor. But God has given us enough and more than enough for that.

The churches that had very little on their own a century ago – they sent missionaries all over world, often with through the ladies missionary societies.
Now established congregations have great wealth and bring the missionaries back home.



23. See, this is what James means when he says, 2:26: “Faith apart from works is dead.” For as the body without the soul is dead, so is faith without works. Not that faith is in man and does not work, which is impossible. For faith is a living, active thing. But in order that men may not deceive themselves and think they have faith when they have not, they are to examine their works, whether they also love their neighbors and do good to them. If they do this, it is a sign that they have the true faith. If they do not do this, they only have the sound of faith, and it is with them as the one who sees himself in the glass and when he leaves it and sees himself no more, but sees other things, forgets the face in the glass, as James says in his first chapter, verses 23-24. [This passage in James deceivers and blind masters have spun out so far, that they have demolished faith and established only works, as though righteousness and salvation did not rest on faith, but on our works. To this great darkness they afterwards added still more, and taught only good works which are no benefit to your neighbor, as fasting, repeating many prayers, observing festival days; not to eat meat, butter, eggs and milk; to build churches, cloisters, chapels, altars; to institute masses, vigils, hours; to wear gray, white and black clothes; to be spiritual; and innumerable things of the same kind, from which no man has any benefit or enjoyment; all which God condemns, and that justly. But St. James means that a Christian life is nothing but faith and love. Love is only being kind and useful to all men, to friends and enemies. And where faith is right, it also certainly loves, and does to another in love as Christ did to him in faith.

Thus we say, too, that faith is everything and it saves us, that a man needs no more for his salvation. Yet he is on this account not idle, but labors much, all however for the benefit of his neighbor, and not for himself; for he does not need it, he has enough in Christ.

All those great professors (like David Scaer) and church leaders (like Jon Buchholz, Wayne Mueller, and Mark Schroeder) imagine that the entire world is saved without faith – that Luther and the Book of Concord teach this strange notion. They peer through their spectacles and find Paul teaching the same nonsense that they have invented, and naturally persecute anyone who openly challenges them.

The modernists are full of contradictions, because they read their notions into the Scriptures and Confessions, which look like a bowl of raspberries with insects swimming around in the juice. It’s difficult to ignore the insects, but the UOJ stylists say – no, this is the real truth of Christianity, the real teaching of Paul and Luther and it has always been so.

But every time I post a Luther sermon, I find just the opposite to be true. Luther is consistent in teaching justification by faith because that is the Chief Article of the Scriptures.

Once that is seen, people realize how much fraud has been promoted in the last century.

35. And this is the method God employs with us all to strengthen and prove our faith, and he treats us so that we know not what he will do with us. This he does for the reason, that man is to commend himself to him and rely on his mere goodness, and not doubt that he will give what we desire or something better. So also these lepers thought: Very well, we will go as he commands, and although he does not tell us whether he will cleanse us or not, this shall not influence us to esteem him any the less than before.

Yea, we will only esteem him so much the more and higher, and joyfully wait, if he will not cleanse us, he will do still better for us than if we were cleansed, and we will not on that account despair of mercy and favor.


Behold, this is the true increase of faith.

40. So these words of the text, “And it came to pass, as they went, they were cleansed,” would say: It is impossible for faith to fail, it must take place as it believes. For if these lepers had not believed and remained steadfast, of course they would not have gone. Therefore, not for the sake of their going, but on account of their faith they became cleansed, because of which they also went.

Not knowing means believing – for we walk by faith, not by sight.


82. How beautifully he divides the three principles, that faith goes forth in trusting, love in laboring, and hope in patience and suffering. As though he would say: Your faith is not a dream nor a fancy, but it is life and action; and your love is not passive nor is it idle, but it serves well for your neighbor. All this takes place in prosperous days. while your hope is exercised in suffering and patience, and all this in Christ; for there is no faith, nor love, nor hope outside of Christ, as I said above. Thus a Christian life goes through good and evil until the end, and yet it does not seek revenge, and only grows more and more in faith, love and hope.

"Early in the morning it rises, sits upon a twig and sings a song it has learned, while it knows not where to obtain its food, and yet it is not worried as to where to get its breakfast. Later, when it is hungry, it flies away and seeks a grain of corn, where God stored one away for it, of which it never thought while singing, when it had cause enough to be anxious about its food. Ay, shame on you now, that the little birds are more pious and believing than you; they are happy and sing with joy and know not whether they have anything to eat."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed. John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, V, p. 114. Trinity 15 Matthew 6:24-34                                                 

"Pietist preachers were anxious to discover and in a certain sense to separate the invisible congregation from the visible congregation. They had to meet demands different than those of the preceding period: they were expected to witness, not in the objective sense, as Luther did, to God's saving acts toward all men, but in a subjective sense of faith, as they themselves had experienced it. In this way Pietism introduced a tendency toward the dissolution of the concept of the ministry in the Lutheran Church."
Helge Nyman, "Preaching (Lutheran): History," The Encyclopedia of the Lutheran Church, 3 vols., ed. Julius Bodensieck, Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1965, III, p. 1943.                                                   

"We have no intention of yielding aught of the eternal, immutable truth of God for the sake of temporal peace, tranquility, and unity (which, moreover, is not in our power to do). Nor would such peace and unity, since it is devised against the truth and for its suppression, have any permanency. Still less are we inclined to adorn and conceal a corruption of the pure doctrine and manifest, condemned errors. But we entertain heartfelt pleasure and love for, and are on our part sincerely inclined and anxious to advance, that unity according to our utmost power, by which His glory remains to God uninjured, nothing of the divine truth of the Holy Gospel is surrendered, no room is given to the least error, poor sinners are brought to true, genuine repentance, raised up by faith, confirmed in new obedience, and thus justified and eternally saved alone through the sole merit of Christ." (Closing of Formula of Concord, Triglotta. p. 1095)
Francis Pieper, The Difference Between Orthodox And Heterodox Churches, and Supplement, Coos Bay, Oregon: St. Paul's Lutheran Church, 1981, p. 65. Tappert, p. 632. Heiser, p. 294. FC SD XI, #94-96.                                             


"Thus too, if our confidence is to begin, and we become strengthened and comforted, we must well learn the voice of our Shepherd, and let all other voices go, who only lead us astray, and chase and drive us hither and thither. We must hear and grasp only that article which presents Christ to us in the most friendly and comforting manner possible. So that we can say with all confidence: My Lord Jesus Christ is truly the only Shepherd, and I, alas, the lost sheep, which has strayed into the wilderness, and I am anxious and fearful, and would gladly be good, and have a gracious God and peace of conscience, but here I am told that He is as anxious for me as I am for Him." Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, IV, p. 86. Third Sunday after Trinity, Second Sermon Luke 15:1-10.                                                 

Saturday, August 31, 2013

Tim Glende's First Church Will Close Soon - Due To Lack of Members, Lack of Funds, Lack of Mission Support

Bethlehem Lutheran is now Eastern Orthodox.

Pastor Tim had to "redevelop" the congregation,
so he could dump the building for a new one with a coffee bar.
I am not kidding.

Very nice church - right on a university campus,
but Bully Tim and his wife did not like it.

Essential Links about the Continuing Fox Valley WELS Scandal.

Star of Bethlehem, Tim's redo of Bethlehem Lutheran Church, is ready to close. The mission board tossed oodles of money at Tim so he could play Emergent Church in Illinois and show those rubes what he learned from Floyd Stolzenburg and Roger Zehms in Columbus, Ohio.

By the way, Tim's home church is also shriveling up under the guidance of various adherent of the Church Shrinkage Movement.

Star of Bethlehem cannot make the mortgage payments, let along the other expenses. The members who joined with Pastor Tim after taking one Bible Information Class are leaving.

Not to worry. The synod will sell the property and get a bunch of cash for it.

It works like this - the members have to pay all the bills and hefty interest payments to the synod. The synod gets the equity when their incompetence is overwhelming.

Pastor Keith Free and SP Schroeder had over $500,000 to give away to buy St. Peter's in Freedom a bankrupt bar. They have nothing for the wreckage he left behind in Illinois. He did not even stay for the ground-breaking of his precious coffee bar church in the cornfields.

"Follow Me, brethren,
and nothing can go wrong."

"Thou Shalt Not Steal" - Applies to Denominations, Too.
Has WELS Returned St. John in Milwaukee Yet? Its Endowment Funds?
VirtueOnline - News

VirtueOnline - News:

The Episcopal Church loses in Texas Supreme Court 
Justices reject hierarchal argument for neutral principles of law

By Mary Ann Mueller 
Special Correspondent 
www.virtueonline.org 
August 30, 2013

AUSTIN, TEXAS-The Episcopal Church lost a major legal battle in Texas Friday when the nine-member state Supreme Court handed down two rulings knocking the knees out from under Katharine Jefferts Schori's unrelenting drive to strip realigned Episcopalians of their property and buildings in the Lone Star state. 

In both cases, the majority of justices ruled that the neutral principles of law must be followed in adjudicating legal disputes over church property. In the first case, entitled Masterson v. Diocese of Northwest Texas, involving the Church of the Good Shepherd in San Angelo, Justice Phil Johnson wrote: "In Masterson we held that the methodology referred to as 'neutral principles of law' must be used.

"This direct appeal involves the same principal issue we addressed in Masterson v. Diocese of Northwest Texas, what methodology is to be used when Texas courts decide which faction is entitled to a religious organization's property following a split or schism?" the Justice ruled. "But, in this case the trial court granted summary judgment on the basis of the "deference" or "identity" methodology, and the record does not warrant rendition of judgment to either party based on neutral principles of law."

As a result, the Texas Supreme Court is kicking case number 11-0265 The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth v. The Episcopal Church back to the 141st District Court in Tarrant County, Texas and back into John Chupp's lap. It was Judge Chupp who granted a summary judgment to The Episcopal Church in Jan. 21, 2011 declaring that Bishop Jack Iker had to "surrender all Diocesan property, as well as control of the Diocesan Corporation, to the Diocesan plaintiffs and to provide an accounting of all Diocesan assets within 60 days of this order." In addition, "the Court hereby orders the Defendants not to hold themselves out as leaders of the Diocese."

However, the Texas Supreme Court said not so fast: "We reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings." 

A summery judgment is where a lone judge makes a determination in a case based upon what he summarizes to be the merits of that case. By doing so, the judge prevents the case from having a full hearing where the facts are revealed on both sides before a jury for adjudication to get a complete airing of the legal dispute in open court. The case is usually appealed to a higher authority. In this case, the Texas Supreme Court. 

The state Supreme Court ruled that Judge Chupp perhaps erred in failing to use the state's neutral principles of law in dealing with property disputes between ecclesial entities rather than relying on the "deference" or "identity" methodology in sorting things out thus buying into The Episcopal Church's claim to absolute hierarchal authority over dioceses and parishes and the grasp of the Dennis Canon upon diocesan and parish properties. 

Neutral principles of law refer to rules grounded in the law itself as opposed to rules based upon personal interests or religious beliefs. This means that a Texas court needs to rule based upon what the legal documents dictate rather than what the church doctrine, canons, or constitution say.

By ruling for the Church of the Good Shepherd in San Angelo and kicking the Diocese of Fort Worth's case back into a lower court, the Supreme Court is setting up precedence for the rule of neutral principle of law to be the guiding factor in dealing with continuing Episcopal Church property litigation in Texas.

"Today the Texas Supreme Court has released rulings in our direct appeal and in the appeal of the parish of Good Shepherd in San Angelo," Diocese of Fort Worth Director of Communications Suzanne Gill explained in a news release. "The Court adopted Neutral Principles of Law as the standard in Texas, overturned the Summary Judgment against us, and remanded our case to the trial court in Fort Worth for rehearing under Neutral Principles.

"The two decisions establish 'neutral principles of law' as the governing approach to church property disputes in Texas courts," explained Allan Haley a noted attorney and canon lawyer who has been keeping a close eye on all of The Episcopal Church's on-going litigations. "And under that approach, as we have seen happen time and again more recently, courts are coming to realize that ECUSA's case has no neutral principles going for it."

Hailey added that the last time the Texas Supreme Court addressed the neutral principles issue in dealing with church property was in 1909, 70 years before the U.S. Supreme Court authorized "neutral principles" in Jones v. Wolf, case number 443 U.S. 595 which was ruled on in 1979. 

Now Texas joins a host of states that use the neutral principle of law in dealing with church real estate disputes. 

Several states have specially decided to use the Jones v. Wolf opinion in their dealings with church property litigations. The 1979 case before the nation's highest court involved Vineville Presbyterian Church, a Presbyterian Church in the United States of America (PCUSA) congregation in Macon, Georgia originally founded 1903. The church membership voted in 1973 to realign with the more theologically conservative Presbyterian Church of America (PCA) taking their property with them. 

PCUSA's position was that Vineville was bound by the control of the Session, Presbytery, Synod, and ultimately the General Assembly and the congregants could not take their building with them. 

Supreme Court Justice Harold Blackmun - who is noted for his authorship of the Roe v Wade ruling - wrote the majority Jones v. Wolf opinion which states: "The state has an obvious and legitimate interest in the peaceful resolution of property disputes, and in providing a civil forum where the ownership of church property can be determined conclusively," thus upholding the Georgia Supreme Court's ruling in affirming a lower court's decision in applying Georgia's neutral principles of law to the Presbyterian dispute. 

But alas, Vineville Presbyterian is no longer. In 2009 the once large Caucasian congregation of 600-plus dwindled to fewer than 50 and voted to disband and turn their property over to the Central Georgia Presbytery which immediately used it for the restart of a multiracial and multicultural congregation at the same location. The redefined parish is named Strong Tower Fellowship. 

The states that specially reference Jones v Wolf as natural principles of law in dealing with ecclesial property matters include: Alaska, Arkansas, Illinois, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Wisconsin. 

The Episcopal Church has already experienced that the Dennis Canon has no weight in South Carolina. The 2009, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that "South Carolina courts are to apply the neutral principles of law approach as approved by the Supreme Court of the United States in Jones v. Wolf." That Sept. 18 ruling came down concerning All Saints Parish Waccamaw v. Protestant Episcopal Church in which the South Carolina Supreme Court declared that the Waccamaw Parish dated as far back a 1734 and the first written trust deed was signed in 1745 where 60 acres were deeded "forever in Trust For the Inhabitants On Waccamaw Neck for Use of A Chapel or Church for divine Worship of the Church of England established by Law․"

The Church of England's direct authority over colonial parishes ceased during the Revolutionary War and the parish was re-established by the South Carolina General Assembly in 1778. The Protestant Episcopal Church of the United States was formed in 1789 from nine original founding dioceses including the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina that was created in 1785 with the Waccamaw Parish being a part of it. Fast forward to 1902 when All Saints became concerned about the status of its charter following the destruction of church documents in a "Great Strom" -- possibly a hurricane -- around the turn of the 20th century. In 1903, the trustees of the Diocese of South Carolina signed a 1903 Quit-Claim Deed thereby transferring any interest the Diocese may have had in the congregation's property to All Saints Parish in Waccamaw.

Then in 1979, the Dennis Canon came on the scene attempting to draw all Episcopal congregations with their personal and real properties under its umbrella so that the chattels may be held by or for the benefit and in trust for this Church and the Diocese that the congregation is located. However, in no way was Canon I.7.4 intended to limit the power and authority of the local congregation so long as it remains a part of, and subject to, The Episcopal Church and its Constitution and Canons.

"The Dennis Canon purports to declare a trust, in favor of the ECUSA and the Diocese, on all real and personal property held by any congregation," the South Carolina Supreme Court ruling explains. "No such property canons existed in 1902 when the Diocese directed the congregation to incorporate, or when it executed the 1903 Quit-Claim Deed in favor of the newly created All Saints Parish, Waccamaw, Inc."

In 2000, All Saints did a title search and learned that the 1745 Trust Deed and the 1903 Quit-Claim Deed were the only recorded land deeds pertaining to the congregation's property. About that same time, the Diocese of South Carolina recorded a notice in Georgetown County legally declaring that the Waccamaw congregation held its property, pursuant to the Dennis Canon, in trust for the benefit of the ECUSA and the Diocese.

Applying only the natural principles of law, the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that when the Church Act of 1767 formed the colonial All Saints Parish, the Statute of Uses operated to execute the trust created by the 1745 Trust Deed and title vested in the intended beneficiary, the congregation of All Saints Parish; that the 1903 Quit-Claim Deed makes it clear that All Saints Parish, Waccamaw, Inc. holds title to its property noting that All Saints Parish congregation was officially incorporated in 1820, that the 1903 Quit-Claim Deed makes clear that title to the property at issue is currently held by the congregation's corporate entity-All Saints Parish, Waccamaw, Inc.;and that neither the Dennis Canon, which is a church-based canon, has no legal effect on title to the All Saints congregation's property. In addition, the Diocese did not, at the time it recorded the 2000 Notice, have any interest in the congregation's property. Therefore, the recordation of the 2000 Notice could not have created a trust over the property.

"For the aforementioned reasons, we hold that title to the property at issue is held by All Saints Parish, Waccamaw, Inc., the Dennis Canons had no legal effect on the title to the congregation's property, and the 2000 Notice should be removed from the Georgetown County records," the Supreme Court ruled.

The All Saints ruling has set a precedent in South Carolina for the application of natural principles of law in determining church property ownership and taking the teeth out of the Dennis Canon. All this should come to play as The Diocese of South Carolina continues its battle with The Church in South Carolina over diocesan property that dates back to colonial days.

Now Texas, too, has a precedent-setting state Supreme Court ruling in place to help guide the courts in determining church property ownership using only the neutral principles of law and not getting mired in church politics, doctrine, constitution and canons in sorting out the intricacies of ecclesial property ownership. 


Mary Ann Mueller is a journalist living in Texas. She is a regular contributor to VirtueOnline

'via Blog this'