Saturday, November 2, 2013

Virtue Online Finds Its Archbishop Just as Weasely as the Lutheran Ones.


NAIROBI: Welby's Weltanschauung Moment 
Archbishop Justin Welby attempts domestication of Evangelical Anglicans

COMMENTARY

By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
October 24, 2013

Archbishop Justin Welby is a self-professed evangelical driven to personal faith by the death of a family member. His faith is deeply rooted in his own conversion experience to Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord.

His sincerity cannot be doubted. His is not a second-hand faith, he has come by it honestly.

Now, as leader of the 77-million member dysfunctional family known as the Anglican Communion, he is trying to herd cats that seemingly won't be herded, and the reasons are plain for all to see. In secular terms, if the mission of a giant corporation changes or is compromised, in time, it dies. One cannot have multiple mission statements. It never works.

This is what is happening in The Anglican Communion. The foundation of Anglicanism is Holy Scripture, the creeds, and the Prayer Book with its Articles of Religion. The church has never deviated from its primary source - Scripture.

With the rupture in Anglicanism over the acceptance and normalization of a variety of pansexual behaviors in a number of Global North provinces, that foundation has been compromised and torn.

At its core then, is Welby's attempt to find a third or middle way that Dr. Rowan Williams struggled with and lost with a Covenant that has been almost universally abandoned. Justin Welby, his successor, is failing in this same strategy.

This past week the new archbishop of Canterbury came to Kenya to bridge the divide with the evangelical wing of his church and offered a sort of Chamberlainesque appeasement to them.

He gave a brief video message that was greeted with a very short, muted round of applause, more out of politeness than anything else.

After telling us that his primary reason in coming to Kenya was to express his support for those massacred at the Westgate Mall, a statement that he could just as easily have made from Lambeth Palace, he went on to say, "We all live in different contexts and the challenge overlaps but is slightly different wherever we live. We are dealing with very rapid changes of culture in the Global North and the issue of sexuality is a very important one. How we respond rightly to that - in a way that is holy, truthful and gracious - is absolutely critical to our proclamation of the gospel."

Almost immediately, reactions from delegates expressed frustration at what they saw as compromise and as yet another wasted opportunity by Welby to stand firm. One bishop told a blogger that it was "almost insulting". Another clergy delegate called it "two-faced", saying "he worked very hard at trying to sound like he was supportive while actually not saying anything clear on the subject. If he thinks we're fooled then he ought not to".

ACNA Ft. Worth Bishop Jack Iker said, "What he had to say was innocuous. It certainly didn't stir the conference or cause any enthusiasm based upon his comments."

Few found it possible to say anything positive about the content of his statement.

At the very deepest level, Welby was treating GAFCON as an Anglican side show, demeaning, being condescending, and marginalizing the very people who could be closest to him; his real allies. Above all, he tried to domesticate them -- the biggest insult of all. These evangelically driven Africans will not be corralled, tamed or controlled. Many, like former Nigerian Archbishop Peter Akinola and current Archbishop Nicholas Okoh, saw it as a continuation of old colonial attitudes that they shucked off long ago. Welby played an old tape that will come back to haunt him.

Doubling their anger and concern was the fact that just days before he personally entertained notorious Episcopal gay Bishop Gene Robinson at Lambeth Palace and then spent time with him in the chapel. This looks for all the world like a foot in the door to the gay lobby by one of its most strident advocates. Robinson is one of the main reasons there was a split in The Episcopal Church that brought about the formation of the ACNA.

Justin Welby just blew off his evangelical foot soldiers by saying that a meeting in Iceland of ecumenical northern European pro-gay state churches under the Porvoo banner was more important than being with his own people. Coupled with that was his baptism of a Royal baby. One wonders if that will ever take and if British royalty will ever amount to anything. Will a King, a generation from now, uphold the faith once for all delivered to the saints. Even now British royalty maintains a shallow faith except from the Queen.

One wonders how short-sighted and stupid Welby is. He grossly underestimated these evangelicals, many of whom are a lot better educated and smarter than he is.

Welby's attempt to maintain a precarious, dare one say precocious, middle ground (and, by so doing, appearing to please nobody) stood in stark contrast to comments from former Archbishop of Sydney, Peter Jensen (the General Secretary of GAFCON). You can read my story here:http://tinyurl.com/plfdb78

"We all live in different contexts," said Anglicanism's top prelate, "and we have to deal with rapid changes in the culture. The issue of sexuality is a major part of that." The Archbishop did not condemn gay marriage but went on to say that "churches respond in different ways" to their various contexts, stating that some have to deal "with war" and others with "governments that are corrupt."

Welby's comments are a complete antithesis to a luncheon address made by retired Archbishop of Sydney, Peter Jensen, to GAFCON's primates, at which Archbishop Welby was present. "Sex," said Jensen, "needs to appear within the context of marriage." Anything else, he stated, amounted to "unholy matrimony."

Friday, November 1, 2013

Confirmed - Intrepid Lutherans Closing.



Circuit Pastor Paul Rydecki above
and Circuit Pastor Steve Spencer
led the first and last Intrepid Lutherans conference.
It was a success.
I posted the rumor about the WELS group blog site closing soon. This was confirmed today in highly secretive messages, sent in machine language, from Spencer.

WELS cannot tolerate any open discussion of doctrine and practice that goes against the New Age boosterism of Mark/Avoid Jeske and his crew.

I agree with the premise that nothing can be done in or through WELS. Gurgle and Schroeder were supposed to be the great reformers, and Schroder makes Gurgle look like Martin Luther.

Moreover, there are dozens  of WELS clergy willing to take Schroeder's place and be Jeske's puppet and PR director. I am not blaming the former high school principal for being a typical high school principal. He was chosen for the role because of his lifelong willingness to fit in with the Wisconsin cult and cover up the crimes.

Schroeder's biggest concern has been his thralls leaking to Ichabod, but leakage has expanded during the stygian darkness of his administration. My biggest problem is keeping up.

Keeping people from this blog has been an epic fail. The page-views per day have moved from 1,000 to 3,000 to 6,000 today. The averages vary - the best way to see the effect is to watch pages erased and links broken after I have copied the URL and the page verbatim.

Breaking News - The Orange Blossom Special was deleted from the Bridge (Muskego, WI, WELS) page on Facebook. Nothing has changed - it just proves the Ichabod effect.


Pastor Rydecki seems happy in ELDONA,
the first group to post agreement with the Bible, Luther, and the Book of Concord
on the topic of justification by faith.
I published specifically against UOJand explained justification by faith in
Thy Strong Word.

A Sad Walk Through Lutherdom Today -
Because Mark Schroeder, John Moldstad, and Matt Harrison Are One with ELCA -
Through Thrivent and Mark/Avoid Jeske

Mark/Avoid Jeske is on the board of Thrivent,
so he oversees the funding of ELCA, WELS, and LCMS.
The Little Sect probably gets some leftovers.


http://www.exposingtheelca.com/1/post/2013/10/a-sad-walk-through-an-elca-seminary.html

(I received this the other day.  It's written by Pastor Tom Brock) - 


Today I walked through my old alma mater, Luther Theological Seminary in St Paul, Mn. It is known as probably the most conservative of the ELCA seminaries [GJ - Like the most conservative member of Obama's team?]. You wouldn’t know it from the number of gay/lesbian bumper stickers in the parking lot. 

Pastrix Nadia Bolz-Weber

Upon entering the main building a sign was up promoting a new book at Luther’s Bookstore, “Pastrix” by ELCA Pastor Nadia Bolz-Weber. She was a favorite speaker at the ELCA Youth Assembly and a few months ago spoke at the historic Central Lutheran Church in downtown Minneapolis—using the “f” word in her speech. I flipped through her new book and she repeatedly uses the “f” word, referring to the 12 disciples as a “bunch of “f” ups”. Former ELCA Head Bishop Mark Hanson praises the book on the dustcover. Even more disturbing is that Bolz-Weber in a sermon on Christ the King Sunday denied that Christ died in our place to pay for our sins. To quote:

And just to be clear: The cross is not about God as divine child abuser sadly sending his little boy off to be killed because we were bad and well, somebody had to pay. 

Can someone deny the things of “first importance” as Paul puts it in I Corinthians 15:3, and still be a Christian? Yet she is a favorite speaker at ELCA events. 

This attack on Christ’s substitutionary atonement is also going on at the ELCA’s Wartburg Seminary. Professor of New Testament David Lull wrote this:

" . . .I can’t get past the idea that God had a thirst for innocent blood that had to be quenched, or that God’s justice required a death-penalty for sinners until Jesus’ death satisfied God’s wrath. Even if Bible passages can be made to support these ideas, I can’t get past the idea that God had been unforgiving before Jesus died. That’s not the God I find in the Bible."

“Even if” the Bible teaches it, Professor Lull rejects it. 

So now the day has come that the ELCA allows pastors and professors to deny the central teaching of the Christian faith: that sinless Jesus Christ died in our place to pay for our sins so that we could receive the forgiveness of God. 

Like I said, a very sad day walking through Luther Seminary.

The ELCiC (Canada)
bishop Susan Johnson laid hands on the
new ELCA Presiding Bishop, Liz Eaton.


Comments

10/31/2013 04:52
Thank God for steadfast shepherds like Lutheran pastor Tom Brock who, unlike their faithless ELCA counterparts, are faithful to preach and teach God's Word.

Pastor Brock writes on his website [ pastorsstudy.org ]:

". . . On October 20th, I will preach on Minneapolis TV a program entitled “God’s Three-fold Cure for America” (you can watch it on our website at pastorsstudy.org soon). In it I state that in my 60 years of life I have never seen America go downhill so fast as I have this past year. Then I preach on the three-fold cure from 2 Chronicles 7:14:

1. God’s people (the Church!) must humble itself
2. The Church must pray
3. We must turn from wickedness

Then, and only then, does 2 Chronicles promise God will heal our land.

Frankly, I see little at the moment that shows America is turning around. So I urge you: Would you please stop right now and take some time and pray for America? Please pray through the above list and pray that God would somehow step in and bring America (and the Church!) back to our senses. . . .

May the Lord grant us Christians grace in these trying times to be vocal, not compromise, and to follow the Word and not the world, all to the glory of our Heavenly Father."

In Jesus our Savior,
Pastor Tom Brock
Reply
Chuck Braun
10/31/2013 07:32
If these liberal theologians and pastors no longer believed Lutheran Biblical Christianity, why couldn't they at least be honest and leave the ELCA for Unitarian Universalism, their true "faith"? Do they not see that the false doctrines they are putting into the minds of the congregations which they serve, are alarming to them and serve only to weaken their faith in the Scriptures which their leaders ostensibly swore to uphold? I guess fancy robes, fat paychecks and promotion of vulgarized apostasy are more important than the flocks which they are leading away from Jesus Christ to their doctrines of demons.

Do these people have no fear of God, Whose Son they will stand before at the Last Day? And having abused "the least of these My brethren", the people with whose souls they were entrusted, with whom will they be counted among? The sheep or the goats? As leaders of the Church, they will be held to a higher degree of accountability. Have these people no fear of eternal punishment?

It is not my position to claim where they will spend eternity, but it is my earnest prayer that they would return to the Lord their God, for He is slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. But they are far from God; we need to pray for their repentance.

Quite often I let my righteous anger bleed over into hostility at the ELCA. But as there are still doubtlessly tens of thousands of ELCA members who truly trust Christ as their Savior and believe that He died and rose again for them, we must consider them our brothers and sisters in Christ, "the least of these", and lovingly confront them with the great spiritual peril which these false teachers are putting them in, rather than ridiculing and mocking them, lest we become "goats" ourselves. 
Reply
Keith Wilson
10/31/2013 11:39
It is irrelevant why such a profligate group would not go associate with a "church" more in line with their beliefs/unbeliefs. These profligate unbelievers are parasites, feed off of any remaining moral capital that the Lutheran Church still might have. When the carcass is picked dry, they will move on to another body of believers to infest and feed off their heritage.
Reply
Gretchen Long
11/01/2013 16:50
I agree!
Jack Richards
11/01/2013 10:51
This, above all else, was the guiding force and drive for me to forsake the denomination that ordained me in 1977. Little could I have guessed that warm June morning that the Christ I promised to follow and proclaim...and "woe to me, if I did not preach it," would move to this cesspool of notions and heresies.
Rev. Jack Richards
Everett, WA

All Saints Day 2013
Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply

    You Do Read Ichabod - 5,500 Views Yesterday - 4,000 at Noon Today

    Ichabod is Fox Valley's favorite blog.

     Learn Lutheran theology for free -
    world's biggest online doctrinal classroom.

    Forgetting the Laity - Who Understand the Clarity of the Scriptures

    Duerer - All Saints.

    The Reformation gave worship back to the people, and the entertainment evangelism specialists have taken it away again.

    For centuries the pipe organ supported the liturgy and great hymns, but untalented amateurs with Japanese keyboards have replaced interactive worship with their tinny interpretations, often with songs no one has ever heard before.

    The professionals know what people want, because they attended various schools built by con artists with a flair for marketing. If the laity do not want all these improvements, they are welcome to leave.

    The worship gurus are allergic to worship themselves. Luther made the sermon the central part of the Christian Church again. He preached sermons all his life and even gave up retirement to preach on the Gospel of John.

    Let's review the resumes of the great Church Growth experts:

    • Waldo Werning made himself a Church Growth consultant but avoided serving a parish for decades - few alive today remember the late Waldo as a pastor.
    • Paul McCain, the plagiarizing blogger who soaks up profits from CPH, only served a parish for two plus years, which was a way to pay him a salary for being Al Barry's campaign manager and Otten's back-door guy.
    • Paul Kelm and Larry Olson were failures in the parish, so WELS made each one a dominatrix for pastors who actually earned their keep in worship, preaching, and visitation.
    • Kent Hunter bragged that he quadrupled the size of a parish, a feat so heroic that he left all parish work to make big money telling people how wise and wonderful he was. And the WELS-LCMS listened in awe.
    • Wayne Mueller knew so much about parish ministry that he grabbed three successive jobs in a row to stay away from the parish ministry. 


    Above is merely a partial list of the dolts who did their best to destroy the Lutheran Church, each one showing a definite loathing and disregard for Biblical doctrine and Lutheran practice. Acting so superior to everyone else, they have promoted Fuller, ELCA, and Roman Catholic agendas. Because they have no confession of faith with their precious UOJ, they confess all dogmas, depending on the audience.

    The clergy would do well to listen to the laity, who read the Scriptures and Confessions without the dog notes beside them. They comprehend Biblical doctrine and write about the issues with great clarity, lacking the mind-bleaching labors of David Scaer, David Valleskey, and Larry Olson.

    A layman going over the ELDONA theses on justification by faith could have easily pointed out those sentences that fall harshly on the unwaxed ear. Who signed the Confessions - just the theologians? No - the lay leaders of the realm put their names on the documents, their lives and fortunes on the line.

    The Lutheran clergy -- and their man-made synods and schools -- have failed this generation. They have control of all the structures. At least they think they do. I see hollow men aping Fuller, the Church of Rome, and ELCA - but these empty suits are in charge. They confuse princely salaries and benefits with doing a good job - while mission pastors suffer, drop out, and find themselves driven out.

    Like WELS, they can discuss Biblical translations for years and decide on the NNIV without ever saying yes or no on that one barbarous creation of the Murdoch factory.

    Like Missouri, they can promote and fund the Church Growth Movement (and worse) while denying it.

    Like the Little Sect on the Prairie, they can strut about on Reformation and yell "Three Solas!" without meaning a word of either one. Grace alone? They offer grace to the Hindu, without faith in anything. Scripture alone? - no dog notes alone, synod says alone. Faith alone? - they settled that 150 years ago, but forgot to tell anyone until now.


    I have no contact with this layman. Look at how clearly he writes:

    http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2013/10/exploring-hubers-doctrine-further.html#comment-form

    Vernon Knepprath said...
    Douglas,

    A fitting conclusion to your words by focusing on Baptism. From my youth, I was taught by Lutheran pastors and teachers that the gift of Baptism is faith, and through faith, justification and forgiveness. After reading your words, I went back to the Large Catechism to reread the words regarding Baptism. Strong clear words, some of which follow ...

    "so also I can boast that Baptism is no human trifle, but instituted by God Himself, moreover, that it is most solemnly and strictly commanded that we must be baptized or we cannot be saved"

    "Therefore state it most simply thus, that the power, work, profit, fruit, and end of Baptism is this, namely, to save. For no one is baptized in order that he may become a prince, but, as the words declare, that he be saved. But to be saved. we know. is nothing else than to be delivered from sin, death, and the devil, and to enter into the kingdom of Christ, and to live with Him forever. "

    "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved. That is, faith alone makes the person worthy to receive profitably the saving, divine water."

    "Thus you see plainly that there is here no work done by us, but a treasure which He gives us, and which faith apprehends; just as the Lord Jesus Christ upon the cross is not a work, but a treasure comprehended in the Word, and offered to us and received by faith."

    I don't see faith being minimized in these words. I don't see faith being referred to with such words as "merely faith", as I have heard from some theologians who advocate universal justification. From these words I see faith as God's gift that is essential to our justification and our salvation.

    Vernon


    Denominations Spend Tons of Money in Court and Staying Out of Court



    SOUTH CAROLINA: TECinSC sues Church Insurance Company for Litigation Funds 
    When all else fails ... sue 

    A VOL EXCLUSIVE REPORT 

    By Mary Ann Mueller
    VOL Special Correspondent 
    www.virtueonline.org 
    October 29, 2013

    Lawyers are expensive. Contracting attorneys is an expensive proposition and once a legal representative steps foot into a courtroom it becomes an even more costly endeavor. With The Episcopal Church engaging in court battles in so many American courtrooms - Quincy, San Joaquin, Virginia, Fort Worth and now South Carolina - the legal bills are piling up, even sky rocketing.

    According to the most recent September Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society ("The Society") Budgetary Year-to-Date Income Statement, The Episcopal Church has spent $245,286 on legal costs, only $82,207 was budgeted leaving a deficit of $163,079 to be filled. Since the first of the year (2013), "The Society" has spent $1,497,903 in legal fees and court costs leaving a $758,042 shortfall. The report also shows that the entire 2013 annual litigation budget is $986,482 making TEC's on-going legal spending at least $511,421 over budget for the first three quarters of the year, a 152% overage with the final quarter of 2013 yet to come. A budgetary report footnote states that some of the legal funds were for "conflict resolution."

    A total for all litigation costs is about $22 million.

    As a result, it looks as if The Episcopal Church in South Carolina (TECinSC) is trying to be creative in its attempt to generate finances needed to pay its mounting legal bills in its swelling legal skirmishes against The Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina - sue. And who is The Episcopal Church in South Carolina suing? Its own church insurance company: the Church Insurance Company of Vermont, a part of the Church Pension Group.

    Thursday, October 31, 2013

    Doug Lindee - WELS Member - WELS Is a Cult.
    Justification by Faith.

    Douglas Lindee has been active
    with the Intrepid Lutherans.



    Mr. Douglas Lindee said...
    Vernon,

    I couldn't agree more. Though I've been preoccupied over the past couple months with pressing business concerns, I have definitely been keeping up with the dialogue on IL. What amazes me about the dialogue between Rev.'s Lawson (ACLC) and Rydecki (ELDoNA) over the past couple months is that, FINALLY, there is an open, calm and coherent discussion on this serious matter (a matter which is clearly NOT settled, but which, it is now fully apparent, has been disputed off and on for 400 years) between two capable disputants who are respectfully disposed toward one another in public. I met Rev. Lawson, very briefly, while attending the 2013 Colloquium and Synod of the ELDoNA, and he struck me then, as he does now, as simultaneously a thoughtful steady man, and a man of conviction. While these characteristics naturally go together, one might not get that impression from the manner in which this issue has been discussed in other forums. Certainly, one would not get that impression by reading the accounts of Schmidt -vs- Walther

    I no longer find it odd that such a thing does not, and will probably never, happen in WELS – on this or any other consequential matter of doctrine or practice – and have entirely ceased looking for or expecting that any such thing will ever happen among them. There is a continuing strident refusal to openly discuss important matters. Rather than find it odd, I recognize it for what it is – as a foreboding cultic tendency. People who get sucked into cults lose their self-identity – their concept of self becomes indistinguishable from the group, and apart from the group's leadership they feel as if they have no guidance and no hope. Positional authority is a psychological weapon among such leaders, and they use it to retain the dedication of their followers and to urge them toward greater productivity in the interest of the group. I'm beginning to see now, what I denied existed when my friends and family first warned us about this sort of thing when we joined WELS over a decade ago. [GJ - I added the blue; the red was in the original.]

    Continued in next comment...
    Mr. Douglas Lindee said...
    ...Continued from previous comment.

    That isn't to say that Confession isn't important. In fact, it is because Confession is such a critical matter that we all must be diligent to make certain that our Confession is True. As stated many times on this blog, a person's Confession proceeds from the convictions of his own Conscience – the seat of his self-identity – as an expression of what he is convinced is True. For the Christian, his self-identity is bound together and inseparable from his identity in Christ and the teachings of Scripture. Since our knowledge of the Truth is imperfect, and since our convictions change with time and experience, this means that an individual's Confession needs to continually be reaffirmed, for, as we have also stated on this blog, when he is called upon to make Confession, he is not speaking to his friends, but is standing before his executioner. Confession and Martyrdom are terms that are defined relative to one another:

    Those who cheerfully confessed Christ before the heathen magistrate at peril of life, but were not executed, were honored as confessors. Those who suffered abuse of all kinds, and death itself, for their faith, were called martyrsor blood-witnesses.
    (Schaff, P. [1996]. History of the Christian Church (Vol. 2, Ante-Nicene Christianity). Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers. [Reprinted from the fifth edition of Volume 2, originally published in 1889]. pg. 76.)

    And we Lutherans have always recognized the connection of Confession to Martyrdom. This is what Luther did when he stood before the Roman Emperor and representatives of the Pope at the Diet of Worms, maintaining his Confession and refusing to recant. This is what the German Princes did when they presented their Confession to the Roman Emperor and representatives of the Pope at Augsburg. Indeed, this connection remains part of our Rite of Confirmation in which we expect our confirmands to give the following oath:

    Do you, as a member of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, intend to continue steadfast in the confession of this Church, and suffer all, even death, rather than fall away from it?
    (The Lutheran Agenda. [1946]. St. Louis, MO: Concordia Publishing House. pg. 24)

    Continued in next comment...


    Mr. Douglas Lindee said...
    ...Continued from previous comment.

    As a layman, I can tell you for a fact, there is no way in the world I could stand before my executioner on the grounds of UOJ. Die over that doctrine? No way. I have no sure foundation on which to defend it. It claims that on account of Christ's work, "God has already DECLARED the whole world of sinners – each and every individual who has or who will ever exist – to be righteous and forgiven before Him", but it cannot adduce a single passage of Scripture where it quotes God having made this universal declaration. This is significant, because the only foundation for my Confession that I would have to offer my executioner as a defense, would be the very words of God Himself, as He has preserved them in the Bible; but nowhere is this "declaration", to which some Lutherans would bind my conscience as the centerpiece of the Christian religion, to be found in its pages. Instead of Scripture, I would be forced defend such a confession by descending into philosophical jibber-jabber, replete with paradox and fantasy.

    On the other hand, the attestation in Scripture for the doctrine of Justification by Faith Alone is to be found practically everywhere, in direct positive – and thus also CLEAR – terms. 

    Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God. (Romans 5:1-2)

    For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God. (Ephesians 2:8)

    And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven. And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. (John 3:13-18)

    ...Baptism does also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ: Who is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God; angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto him. (1 Peter 3:21-22)

    I am justified by faith, and this is what saves me from eternal condemnation. Apart from faith I am not forgiven; quite the opposite, apart from faith I am condemned. I know that I have been given saving faith, and thus also righteous standing before God and eternal salvation, NOT because of the strength of my convictions (which, in my human weakness wax and wane), but by the objective fact of my Baptism through which the promises of Jesus Christ are conferred. And there can be no question that I was baptized – I have documented proof, signed by the witnesses who were in attendance and notarized. In times of distress, when my faith is weak, I don't look to some universal declaration of God that is nowhere recorded in the Scriptures; I look to my Baptism and the promises clearly attending it, and thus know that God has given me faith, and with it forgiveness, life and salvation.










    What I Want for Reformation Day



    http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/10/wels-motto-read-mark-and-erase-big-push.html

    Vernon Knepprath said...
    I thank God that this blog [Intrepid Lutherans] and a small handful of other Confessional Lutheran blogs still exist, because more often than not, these kinds of discussions are not to be found within the local churches, either because of neglect or by intent. These discussions are truly amazing. They are generally orderly and respectful, with a few exceptions. Every person has a chance to respond, so the one-sided nature and unsubstantiated accusations in articles such as what showed up in a recent edition of Christian News does not stand for a lengthy time unanswered, with the implication that somehow those unsubstantiated accusations are true. But most importantly, the simple truths of Scripture shine through again and again.

    The Scriptural teaching of justification is simple, and only becomes complicated when people change the definition of words or add/subtract from what Scripture says.

    The Scriptural truth of justification is reflected in many of the simple traditional 'teachings' of the Lutheran Church, at least where thay have not yet been corrupted or omitted or ignored. Some of the simple teachings I am thinking of are 'three solas', the Apostles Creed and the Means of Grace. By design, the Scriptural truths of justification are clear in all of these and more.

    As the Apostles Creed is removed from more and more Lutheran worship services, can there be doubt of what purpose is being served? As the Sacraments are hidden from view and removed from the main body of worship, is there really any wonder as to the intent? As the importance of 'Scripture alone' and 'faith alone' are diminished in the three solas, should we not be more concerned? All of these, in their own way, are facilitating a slow but certain rewrite of the the Scriptural truth of justification.

    God's Word clearly teaches that we are justified by faith. And God's Word doesn't change.

    Vernon

    WELS-LCMS-ELS quickly moved from communing ELCA members
    to having congregations that hid both sacraments, the Creeds, liturgy, and
    the name Lutheran.
    Who advocated communing ELCA members in his own congregation?
    Jay Webber - UOJ guru.


    ***

    GJ - Every so often, someone writes, "I do not agree with you," or the writer takes pains to tell me someone else does not agree.

    That has never been the point of writing. I have no need to control another person's publishing, even though the Committee to Silence Ichabod meets frequently. I would rather see doctrinal opponents post more often and more frankly. Discussion is good for doctrine.

    What do I want for Reformation Day, once the Hurray Luther! Three solas! business is over?

    I want people to like - the way I do:

    • Luther, reading his sermons throughout the week.
    • Lutheran hymns, using them throughout the church year and playing them during the week.
    • The Concordists, especially Melanchthon and Chemnitz, subordinate only to Luther.
    • The American confessors - Lenski, Jacobs, Krauth, Reu, Loy, Schmauk, and L. Fuerbringer.
    • The King James Bible and The Lutheran Hymnal.





    Schroder, Buchholz, and Spencer Want To Shut Down Intrepid Lutherans.
    Back Up the Blog If You Like the Posts

    Rydecki and Spencer - First and Only Intrepids Conference -
    And then there were none.


    Just between you and me, the Intrepid Lutherans blog will probably shut down very soon.

    Rydecki has been making merry with excellent posts - something that will NOT go unpunished in WELS, the not-so-secret hideout of Stalinism, parochialism, drunken and abusive pastors.

    "I think we kicked that sucker out, and he is still posting on our blog."

    "Boss, that is an independent blog, not really ours."

    "They all belong to us. Off with their heads."

    Buchi has cured his chapped hide, funded Rick Johnson,
    cuddled with Jeff Gunn, and kicked out Paul Rydecki.
    Stop helping the cause - go back to real estate deals, Jon-Boy.


    There is a way to back up the whole blog, so I suggest you do that. The Issues in WELS blog was erased suddenly and many posts lost - except my researcher, a doctor of divinity, saved the best ones.

    WELS has been circling the drain for a long time. The so-called reformers, Schroeder and Buchie, have only made it worse:

    • More anti-Biblical than ever before, with the New NIV.
    • More anti-Confessional, backing The CORE, The Bridge, and other blasphemies.
    • More Jeske-subservient. We will always remember Buchie as the bad-boy DP who signed the petition against Jeske's mischief, then endorsed Jeske at the WELS convention. "Faith makes us bold," as Luther wrote, and Buchie has no faith.
    • More anti-Christian, yes even worse than Mischke (Burn in Peace) and Gurgel (May God smite you with DP Patterson as a boss). Schroeder and Buchie are all out for UOJ, which proves they know nothing about the Scriptures or Lutheran doctrine.
    When bookkeepers become Synod President,
    adopt a grumpy cat as a pet.

    Wednesday, October 30, 2013