Monday, June 5, 2023

Canada's Lutheran Education Has Moved into Stealth Mode, Eh?

 

ELCiC Bishop since 2007 - Susan Johnson. Her bio? So far I have not found it.

My alma mater in Canada was formed to provide Lutheran pastors there. One man walked down to the States to get that dream started in Waterloo, Ontario. Waterloo Lutheran Seminary started small and remained small, yet it built a university around it, WLU. That became Wilfred Laurier U. to obtain more government financial support. The seminary barely exists but offers more degrees than it has students.

"In Fall 2022, Martin Luther University College established Luther’s Queer Space, a social extracurricular program aimed at creating drop-in events for 2SLGBTQQIA+ identified students to connect, have fun and de-stress throughout the year."

Apparently, the building is mostly devoted to counseling. The chapel offers dog days where students sit on floor cushions and pet dogs.

 Note - Keffer Chapel, not dog pound.

An excellent - probably little used - pipe organ graces Keffer Chapel.

These are WELS women dancing with gossamer wings or carpet protectors. The pews seem almost empty. This is where everything is going. Dogs and cushions will be next.

 

LCMS Partners Falling Apart

"The LCC currently has two seminaries, CLS-Edmonton, and Concordia Lutheran Theological Seminary in St. Catharines, Ontario.

According to The Association of Theological Schools Commission on Accrediting, Concordia Theological Seminary-St. Catherines has 18 full-time students and 4 faculty."

Susan Johnson (Waterloo Lutheran Seminary graduate) was voted in as ELCiC Bishop - ELCA with a kick. All the Lutherans up north will barely amount to statistic soon.

Daily Luther Sermon Quote - Examples of Unbelief and Faith. The Rich Man and Lazarus

 





1. We have hitherto heard in our Gospel lessons of various examples of faith and of love; for as they all teach faith and love, I hope you are abundantly and sufficiently informed that no human being can be pleasing to God unless he believes and loves. Now in this Gospel text the Lord presents to us at the same time an example of faith and of unbelief or of the state of the godless, in order that we also may abhor the contrary and the opposite of faith and love, and that we may cleave to faith and love more diligently.

For here we see the judgment of God upon the believers and the unbelievers, which is both dreadful and comforting. Dreadful to the faithless and comforting to the faithful. But in order that we may the better grasp the meaning of this text we must picture to ourselves both the rich man and poor Lazarus. In the rich man we see the nature of unbelief and in Lazarus the nature of belief.

PART I. THE RICH MAN.

2. We must not view the rich man according to his outward conduct; for he is in sheep’s clothing, his life glitters and shines beautifully, while he tactfully conceals the wolf. For this Gospel text does not accuse him of adultery, of murder, or robbery, of violence or of having done anything that the world or reason would censure. Yea, he has been as honorable and respectable in his life as that Pharisee who fasted twice a week and was not as other men, of whom Luke 18:11f. speaks. For had he committed such glaring sins the Gospel would have mentioned them since it examines him so particularly that it describes even the purple robe he wore and the food he ate, which are only external matters and God does not judge according to them. Therefore he must have led outwardly an exemplary, holy life; and according to his own opinion and that of others, he must have kept the whole law of Moses.

3. But we must look into his heart and judge his spirit. For the Gospel has penetrating eyes and sees deep into the secret recesses of the soul; reproves also the works which reason cannot reprove, and looks not at the sheep’s clothing, but at the true fruit of the tree to learn whether it is good or not, as the Lord teaches in Matthew 7:17. Hence if we judge this rich man according to the fruits of faith, we will find a heart and a tree of unbelief. For the Gospel chastises him that he fares sumptuously every day and clothes himself so richly, which reason never considers as especially great sins. Besides, the work-righteous people think it is right, and that they are worthy of it, and have merited it by virtue of their holy lives, and they do not see how they thus sin by their unbelief.

4. For this rich man is not punished because he indulged in sumptuous fare and fine clothes; since many saints, kings and queens in ancient times wore costly apparel, as Solomon, Esther, David, Daniel and others; but because his heart was attached to them, sought them, trusted in and chose them, and because he found in them all his joy, delight and pleasure; and made them in fact his idols. This Christ indicates by the words “every day,” that he lived thus sumptuously daily, continuously. From this is seen that he diligently sought and chose such a life, was not forced to it nor was he in it by accident, or because of his office or to serve his neighbor; but he only thereby gratified his own lust, and lived to himself and served only himself.