Monday, June 29, 2009

Study of Pietism - Starting Next Sunday



Spener started Pietism with his little book.


Our adult study series on Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant has ended.

This Sunday will begin a series on The History and Influence of Pietism.

Lessons are being saved on Vimeo. Check the list in the left column.

I am going to publish my review of Schmidt's History of Pietism, which can be purchased at Northwestern Publishing House. Click here for the book. NPH seems to have the Hoenecke graphic where the Schmidt graphic should be. I am going to check that out. The picture reads "Evangelical Dogmatics I."

The Schmidt book is a tough one to read. Any intellectual history is going to be hard to follow, especially when events are so distant from us in time and culture. However, pastors and interested laity should give it a try.

The Lutheran bodies established in America were profoundly influenced by Pietism and still are. The Muhlenberg tradition (LCA, now ELCA) came from Halle University, the heart of Pietism. CFW Walther belonged to Pietist circles before he came over to America. The Swedes and Norwegians were Pietists. The Wisconsin Synod began as a unionistic, Pietistic sect. Hoenecke - one of their better theologians - was trained at Halle University, under Tholuck, an avowed Universalist.

Some of us are researching the history of Universal Objective Justification. Reformed doctrine and Pietism are the leading causes for UOJ being promoted by Walther, WELS, and the Little Sect on the Prairie.

The Shrinkers of WELS love UOJ, which excuses them from any doctrinal rigor. Everyone is already forgiven, so whatever they do to sign people up is justified by their profound concern for the lost (a core value in Pietism). Taking away trust in the Means of Grace - Pietism. Telling the laity they are responsible for evangelism - Pietism.

Let us pause for a moment and consider the Parable of the Lost Sheep in Luke 15, the Gospel lesson for those who do not follow the Roman lectionary. The shepherd looks for the lost sheep in that parable. He does not stay at home, drinking beer, creating a Vision Statement. Kent Hunter, that guru for all Lutherans, says, "Sheep have sheep. Shepherds to not have sheep." That is his lame justification for inserting the Fuller Pietistic agenda into Lutheran congregations. He is the Church Doctor but more of Kevorkian.

Joel Gerlach repeated the Pietistic Fuller mantra by saying the church must make disciples to make disciples to make disciples....

Pietists are unionistic.

Pietists despise the Sacraments and reject the efficacy of the Word.

Pietists have been polarizing and divisive by broadcasting how superior they are to everyone else.

Does anything sound like Church and Chicanery so far?

Like the Shrinkers in Missouri and the Little Sect?

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Greg,

I'm looking forward to this. In fact I have a news flash for you! I discovered in my library your book Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant(copyright 1993). Well actually, I didn't really discover it. I knew it was there. I just didn't put two and two together. (My bad...C&C brain and all I guess.)

I was reading the chapter on justification and I have to be honest. I am in agreement with what you said on pages 99 and 100. In fact, I doubt you will find any WELS pastor disagree with what you said there. Have you revised your position and your book since the 1993 printing?

Joe Krohn

Anonymous said...

Pastor-leaders only have power of the minds of members because we believe and allow them to.

Anonymous said...

The Truth is whatever WELS leaders want it to be.

Anonymous said...

Can WELS do anything right in the eyes of God? With UOJ it does not matter. All the wolves receive forgiveness.

Anonymous said...

WELS offers a fine case study in the maladroit application of the Word of God.

John said...

Anonymous 10:45: Are you saying that the blame for pastors and leaders who abuse their offices and teach falsely lies with those who have placed their trust in them to properly carry out the offices to which they have been called and elected? If so, wouldn't that be like saying that the sheep are to blame for the actions of the shepherd?

Anonymous said...

Tired of Religion, Try Jesus

Matthew 11:28-32 (New International Version)

28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."

LutherRocks said...

How come you didn't post my comment? It was a good one! I even signed it. Where do you stand on your statements regarding UOJ in your book 'Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant' book on pages 99 and 100, Greg? Any WELS pastor would approve!

JK

Bruce Church said...

Joe Krohn, In the pages of Ichabod's blog, you can see where Dr. Jackson notes he was led astray by WELS terminology. When well-read laymen pointed out what the WELS actually meant when they said Objective Justification, he took that out of later editions. He also inserted a note in the later editions of his book mentioning that he deleted the Objective Justification content. That book is online for free download.

You have to cut Dr. Jackson some slack. He was taught correct Lutheran doctrine, not the Pietistic reworking. Besides, who, knowing orthodox Lutheran doctrine, would ever think anyone calling themselves Lutheran would ever say that God justified the entire world objectively, including Hitler?!! That took him by surprise.

Anonymous said...

http://www.wels.net/cgi-bin/site.pl?process&procID=1518&cuQA_qaID=1&cuTopic_topicID=45&cuItem_itemID=24523

Although some of the WELS Q&A make me scratch my head and wonder, I like this one. Is this what you refer to as UOJ? This answer puts into words the way I believe on the subject. Is it correct?

rlschultz said...

Just look at the decrease in the number of members in the WELS in the past 20 years. Has Joel Gerlach's notion of evangelism by geometric progression really worked?