WELS Church Lady wrote me to say she did not send the comment posted about Mary Lou College's Gaydar dish.
She suspected a college student. As people know from the front page editorial in WLC's The Thword, the students at both schools tend to be weepy and whiny, easily hurt and offended. They really need your support and affirmations, so mail them some Miley Cyrus and Adam Lambert videos to watch, to boost their spirits.
I question that they have really forgiven their opponents, as they claim, because gracious losers would not feel compelled to take on another person's identity on a blog. Deceit is so subtly taught at those two colleges. WLC even tried to hire Gunn as a second chaplain, to provide even more contemptuous worship when the students are not interested in it anyway. Gunn pretends to be Lutheran, one more deception from the Chicaneries. WELS pretends to discipline Gunn. "What a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive."
Someone posted on Bailing Water, using my name. I do not mind anonymous comments at all. Many people do need to protect their identities, knowing what the Chicaneries are like. However, stealing someone's identify is really low.
The Church and Change leaders excel at only one thing, and that is not Lutheran ministry. They are superb at destroying relationships. They will do anything to keep their opponents from reaching critical mass and tossing them out. WELS would be better off losing 1/3 of the pastors and most of the teachers. The entire school system could be sold to Missouri, Fuller, or ELCA. It is nothing more than a feeder system for Fuller, Willow Creek, Granger, Northpoint, Life Church, Mars Hill, and Leonard Sweet.com.
---
TR has left a new comment on your post "More Puerile Behavior":
Greg,
As a WELS member, I have some issues with your comments. I will not stand and defend everything that MLC students do - they are students and sinners. However, their choice of college does not change their sinful Adams overnight. Are they held to a higher standard? Yes. Should they be?
You will find, if you looked, that the majority of students at the school are strong Christian leaders. They are doing their best to prepare themselves for the public ministry.
The problem, of course, is that there are some students who give a bad name to the others. You could categorize them by the sports they play, the high schools the attended, or even by their family name. Those students would be doing many of the same things at any other school. Would you use the statement of "the students at both schools tend to be weepy and whiny, easily hurt and offended" to say that all students at the University of Phoenix or the University of Notre Dame are also weepy and whiny - because of the actions of a few?
Your post on the "gaydar" is going too far. If you have ever spoken to President Mark Zarling, you would recognize a man who is a stalwart Lutheran, who has a genuine love of education, and who is actively working towards change at all levels of the school. His door is always open to talk with students about any problem they face. His door was open when the men who put the video online wanted to talk about what they should do.
***
GJ - A stalwart Lutheran would not allow his school to be used as a backdrop for "Luther" flinging the Scriptures away to do battle with the Sprinter. A stalwart Lutheran would have the video removed from You Tube.
The excuses for "Party in the MLC" were so flimsy that they deserved the gaydar graphic. I asked one Lutheran if anyone could possibly miss the gaity of the original, "Party in the Fire Island Pines." He said, "Impossible." Needless to say, the MLC version was far worse in every respect, but the actors have "forgiven" those who objected. Tis funny how that forgiveness was expressed in a rather nasty, self-indulgent front page editorial in The Thword (WLC), which was weepy and whiny.
I do not blame all of MLC or all of WLC for the idiotic behavior of a few athletes. I do blame the student bodies for jumping on the bandwagon to defend the video by attacking anyone offended. Readership doubled overnight when I posted the video the first time. College students could not wait to post examples of their blind loyalty to friends, poor education in Lutheran doctrine.
I know there are good students and professors at both schools, but both schools are turning out classic mainline apostates nevertheless.
MLC's need to run their own Church and Change day (disguised as Missions Day) was another example of flinging poo in the face of WELS, especially with Paul Calvin Kelm as the elderly exemplar of apostasy - keynote speaker, no less.

8 comments:
What a crybaby. GJ, you really show your colors in a post like this. Put your big boy "Independant Lutheran" depends on. Do you really expect any kind of semblance on this blog?
"They are superb at destroying relationships."
There's some irony for you. Once again you have gone out of your to behave as an ass.
Greg,
As a WELS member, I have some issues with your comments. I will not stand and defend everything that MLC students do - they are students and sinners. However, their choice of college does not change their sinful Adams overnight. Are they held to a higher standard? Yes. Should they be?
You will find, if you looked, that the majority of students at the school are strong Christian leaders. They are doing their best to prepare themselves for the public ministry.
The problem, of course, is that there are some students who give a bad name to the others. You could categorize them by the sports they play, the high schools the attended, or even by their family name. Those students would be doing many of the same things at any other school. Would you use the statement of "the students at both schools tend to be weepy and whiny, easily hurt and offended" to say that all students at the University of Phoenix or the University of Notre Dame are also weepy and whiny - because of the actions of a few?
Your post on the "gaydar" is going too far. If you have ever spoken to President Mark Zarling, you would recognize a man who is a stalwart Lutheran, who has a genuine love of education, and who is actively working towards change at all levels of the school. His door is always open to talk with students about any problem they face. His door was open when the men who put the video online wanted to talk about what they should do.
TR,
Very nice comment. I agree quite readily.
Anonymous @ 9:02,
While GJ is not very respectful, let's be respectful at him and at least set a good example.
Luther flinging the Bible was a bad thing in that video, no doubt (I am in no way defending it). But, just to be clear, that was before Pres. Zarling's time at MLC. The students who made it graduated before Pres. Zarling's arrival as well.
Once again, I'm not defending the video in anyway, just pointing out that it's unfair to pin that one on Zarling. That being said, would it be a good idea to take it down? Most definitely.
Mark Zarling "a stalwart Lutheran"?!? TR, you've got to be kidding. Compare his essay on Justification to the Lutheran Confessions.
Here's a putrid taste:
WELS MLC President Mark Zarling, "Faith does nothing more than receive the forgiveness which is offered in the Gospel. It is not a condition we fulfill nor is it a cause of forgiveness. We are already forgiven. God's message of justification in Christ is there whether we believe it or not. Faith then receives the blessings." And, "Faith that accepts the good news of universal justification is the work of God the Holy Ghost." Page 7
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/ZarlingJustification.pdf
Zarling, "Stressing faith as the cause of justification makes it a meritorious work. We have then destroyed the sola gratia of the Gospel, and cause men to look within themselves for the assurance of salvation."
Zarlings a heretic and who rejects the righteousness of God through faith and creates his own gospel, distributing Christ's righteousness to the entire unbeleiving world while they are alive to sin, carnaly minded and at war with God. Compare Zarling's perversion of faith to Scripture, 2nd Corinthians 13:5, "Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?"
Perhaps I missed it, but how was The Sword's article nasty, weepy, and whiny?
It's pronounced The Thword.
"The excuses for "Party in the MLC" were so flimsy that they deserved the gaydar graphic."
They deserved it? Wow. That's absolutely spectacular of you to say. Even two months later they apparently deserve to be mocked? You have no concept of the term constructive criticism. And really, is asking them to provide a public apology constructive criticism? Someone like you shouldn't be given such an honor if it is. It probably wouldn't satisfy your harsh tongue. You are a poor example to Christians everywhere, Reverend Jackson. Absolutely shameful.
P.S. to Brett Meyer: You're not funny.
Post a Comment