Friday, January 16, 2009

St. Andrews Latte Church versus Freddy Finkelstein



Standing too close to the espresso altar can cause problems
during a power surge.



Is this Luther's Theology of the Cross? I think not.


Freddy Finkelstein said...(Bailing Water comment)
“The approach being used at Waunakee is adiophora (sic).”

Adiaphora – the strawberry bubblegum of the Church Growth movement. They keep a wad in their mouth so that they are always ready to spit it out (yes, I've chewed this bubblegum too -- thank God it's finally lost its flavor). Adiaphora for them is nothing but Green Fields and Blue Sky as far as the eye can see, and everything so designated affords the claimant full creative license to dance in the daisies and chase butterflies, unfettered by pesky 500-year-old Confessional documents. Yes, there is freedom, but it is hardly unfettered. Indeed, if one cares to read the Confessions for oneself and take them seriously, it is apparent that our so-called adiaphora is bounded far more narrowly than the free-birds among us wish it to be known.

What is the proof offered that this congregation operates under the umbrella of Lutheran Confessionalism? Why, listen to the sermons, one is told – it's got Law and Gospel, therefore they're Biblical. Well, such advice misses the point – the entire issue has nothing whatsoever to do with preaching (at least not directly), it has to do with Practice.

So, what evidence is there that this congregation operates outside the umbrella of Lutheran Confessionalism? Look at their Confession and their Practice. What I stated on this blog a few months ago (here) applies in this case as we examine a congregation's practice: “But, while Krauth was addressing doctrine, are we not, in our case, looking at Lutheran practice? Yes and no. We are rightly concerned with practice as it is a reflection of what we Confess, and we see evidence of doctrinal error in the practice of the C&C crowd. When those who confess doctrinal unity with us engage in practice that is confusing or offensive, we have every right to demand of them an explanation, and they have every obligation to render one. Drawing the C&C or CG crowd into explanation of their practice, more and more, it seems, exposes their divergence from us and their disregard for anything more than rhetorical unity. So, while we take our queue from confusing and offensive practices endorsed by the C&C church-growthers, our concern is Confessional integrity.” If this congregation gives one indication in their sermons and confessional statements, and gives another in their Practice, they are guilty of offense. Their practice in this case strikes one as open sectarianism. Too bad the FIC “journalists” were too busy celebrating innovation that they didn't also notice that there might be an issue, and go to pains to give evidence to the contrary.

While it may be groovy jargon, “Keepin' it real” in the Divine Service means keeping it Confessional, means keeping the Marks central, means overt and prominent use of the Means of Grace and overt rejection of statistically derived man-made contrivances designed to coerce and manipulate people through clever use of Natural Law (contrivances held out to us by the heterodox in oh-so-many tempting ways), it means subjecting individuality to unity in confession and practice, and it means so much more that CG Church Changers apparently view as the irrelevant trappings of medieval Christianity. I am not impressed by Lutheran congregations so imbued with creativity and so-called “evangelical concern” that they can't seem to actually do “Church.”

The quote at the head of this blog reads, “Anything that isn’t unbiblical is fair game.” The glaring omission in this statement is reference to the Confessions. It should have read, “Anything that isn’t unbiblical, and isn't non-Confessional, is fair game.” Better yet, “The only fair game is that which is Biblical and Confessional.” Too many Pastors, it appears to me, think they are clever enough to recreate the Confessions directly from Scripture – so that whatever they derive directly from Scripture is automatically Confessional. It's becoming apparent to me now, that Rev. Berg was right when he stated on this blog many months ago: “Missouri, for all its problems, at least has a sizeable confessional movement. While Wisconsin has plenty of conservative pastors I could probably count the confessional pastors on two hands. Most of these men have been marginalized or are lying low.”

Freddy Finkelstein

WELS - Typical Church and Change Guys


Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Sound Advice from Freddy Finkelstein":

Typical Church and Change resentment when given reproof and correction. Unless they get the respect that they think they richly deserve they react with vindictiveness and nastiness.

***

GJ - Yes, there was an interesting event involving the Florida WELS experiment, which became a Roman Catholic parish. They actually built an attractive building, threw all kinds of money at it, and put their most unstable Church Growth pastors in it, all at once. Randy Catter and Mark Freier were involved; neither one is Lutheran now.

At a nearby parish someone made a chance remark during a church council meeting. It was mild and factually true. Well, he had to apologize. And he did. That was not enough. This went on forever. I received a stack of papers in the mail. Otherwise it would not be believable that grown men could wig out and stay wigged out for so long.

I have noticed that WELS DPs want a triple-scoop of apologies, too. I have never known that a DP apologized for wrecking parishes, for ruining the lives and families of pastors, for promoting known adulterers and false teachers.

Presidential Quotations





This link morphs the images. I haven't found the You Tube embed code.