Sunday, October 25, 2009

MLC Video Comment - But Wait - Does Everyone Know the Entire Concept Was Copied from Another Group?




Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Mary Lou College's Own Flock of Seagulls--or--Girls Gone Wild...":

I suppose one could chalk it up to "college humor" and call it quits. But there is an element of mean-spirited sarcasm and deprecation be it the older NWC or current MLC variety. If one has ever been on the receiving end or seen someone on the receiving end of the supposedly "just done in jest" remarks, one can but cringe at the snarky jokes, skits, etc. One would hope most have moved beyond that. It's pathetic when it doesn't happen. The pattern, once ingrained, rears its ugly head again and again. In WELSdom, it's so difficult to tackle an issue objectively without someone interjecting a college-era assessment of so and so. Those off-hand remarks hijack the issue-at-hand and turn it into character defamation. The esoteric nature of the humor is pretty much lost on those outside the circle. Not that anybody really cares though. The circle is limited to start with. Grow up and leave the schoolboy ways behind.

***

GJ - The Shrinkers in WELS are thin-skinned but really caustic in their "just joking" comments. Someone anonymously claimed I ruined the reputations of these kids by embedding their video. They produced the video, recording it without any suggestions from me, and--behold--posted the video to YouTube for all the world to watch and enjoy.

Here is the real scandal - the entire video is a bad copycat version of Party in the FIP, which has 2 million views. I stumbled on it while looking for more information on the MLC one. I will embed the code for both.



nycfudge
August 24, 2009


Music Video to Miley Cyrus' "Party in the USA" Filmed with my Flip Video mino HD
Music Video to Miley Cyrus' "Party in the USA"

Filmed with my Flip Video mino HD
Category: Music



beilke22
October 07, 2009

http://tinyurl.com/yhgwql7 This is our dorm video for Summit dorm at MLC, Homecoming 2009. Thanks to the fellas of FIP for the inspiration. [Inspiration? Intellectual theft with a vague reference is not inspiration.]


So we have a real hoot. The kids have shamed themselves, WELS, and MLC by stealing an original idea and presenting it as their own. I would say they had a great future ahead of them - except the Shrinkers are shrinking in number. They have hitched their wagons to a falling star.

I will let the readers compare the two versions.
---

DK has left a new comment on your post "MLC Video Comment - But Wait - Does Everyone Know ...":

Ok Professor

Let me apologize to you and others.

This completely changes it. I've commented regarding the video and I've criticized people who call this video a sin--I'd like to revise...Totally!

If the MLC video had been an original, not a parody of a video done by openly recognized homosexuals (filmed at a gay and lesbian resort), I would stand by my earlier opinion. In that case it would've just been a silly bunch of kids making fun of a song.

But as it is, I think the MLC students involved gave a whole lot of credence to the homosexual lifestyle. Seeing the original video makes me wonder if some of the MLC students are gay themselves. I mean, I'm pretty sure their (sic) not, but I think it's logical for an observer to wonder.

I know I was defending their actions as "childish but not wrong" but seeing the gay video made me do a 180--they've undeniably associated themselves to gay culture. I believe that making the video was wrong, and the fact that they called it "Party in the MLC" annihilates MLC's credibility as a religious school. In fact I think I might be writing the Dean of Students at MLC.

Why shouldn't these students be expelled?

If this is not (in essence) a public statement by certain future WELS pastors and teachers that homosexuality is a laughing matter, then what would it take?? And if MLC doesn't discipline those students isn't it reasonable to believe that MLC is officially permissive of gayness?

I'm very sorry that I didn't look into the issue further before forming an opinion and criticizing people as too stringent.

***

GJ - Your apology is accepted. Now MLC should apologize to WELS. Not long ago SP Schroeder took on ELCA for its endorsement of homosexuality. This video is certainly a backwards step. I had more information about the original FIP video, once I found it, but that information was not something I wanted to discuss.


I do not find the MLC copy-cat version cool, funny, or creative. True, it is even worse when the original is viewed. The MLC video is worse in several respects. The crotch-grabber would qualify in many communities as cause for arrest for public indecency. Does MLC have any standards at all? Wait, I remember - their favorite keynote speaker is Paul Calvin Kelm. Doctrinal apostasy always bears fruit.

Girls Gone Wild - Not About the MLC Video

The original Girls Gone Wild is here.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Father Hollywood <==Mequon grads, left click for source. Thnx.


Girls Gone Wild, WELS Edition


In spite of the Wisconsin Synod's reputation for "conservative" rigor, WELS has a rather "liberal" view when it comes to women officiating at the Eucharist.

According to this Q&A from the WELS's own website, there have been at least two instances where laywomen in the WELS have said the Lord' Words of Institution over bread and wine and served it, claiming that it was the body and blood of the Lord. The practice was in no way condemned by the WELS hierarchy, but rather, the practice is current under a "moratorium" in order to "keep from offending our brothers."

This error has come about by the intersection of an error on the doctrine of the ministry combined with a legalistic view of the role of women.

First, WELS does not believe the pastoral office has been divinely established, and further teaches that "The Bible establishes all of public gospel ministry but does not establish a pastoral office as such or vest certain duties exclusive to that office" (Emphasis added).

From this starting point, WELS adds the next premise that the differences between male and female are limited to a legalistic "thou shalt not," as the article puts it:

"Since the Bible does not assign specific duties to the pastor, WELS approaches the matter of women communing women from Scripture's man and women role relationship principle. WELS doctrinal statements on the role of man and woman say that a woman may have any part in public ministry that does not assume teaching authority over a man. That, of course, would include women communing women" (emphasis added).
And this has moved beyond the theoretical into the practical:
"WELS has had only two instances of women communing women, and our Conference of Presidents has since issued an indefinite moratorium on such practice to keep from offending our brothers until the matter is mutually resolved" (emphasis added).

The "it's only happened twice" defense reminds me of the Monty Python sketch claiming that the British Navy now has cannibalism "relatively under control."
[GJ - Note that Father Hollywood wrote this column, which I have quoted verbatim. If you want to condemn him for making a Monty Python comparison, contact him and leave your real name.]

In other words, the theology of male and female boils down to an oversimplified and law-based overarching principle that women are free to do anything and everything in the Lord's economy so long as she does not exercise authority over a man in doing so - when in fact, the role of women is much richer than the "anything other than..." approach of the WELS. Accepting these two premises and following them to their logical end yields the result of women saying the Words of Institution over bread and wine, and distributing the elements to each other as if they were the true body and blood.

This is roughly the equivalent of my asserting that since I'm an American citizen, I can sign my name on a bill and make it a law, or that I can authorize people to go up into the Statue of Liberty's crown, or may indeed put stars on my lapels and order military personnel about. I can do no such thing. It is a matter of authority. Pastors are ambassadors of Christ, and speak by His authority, standing in His stead and by His command. The American ambassador to Canada speaks with the authority of the government of the United States. Of course, I am free to visit the Parliament in Ottawa, but unlike the word of the ambassador, my word bears no authority. Any statements I make have no force behind them, as I have not been placed into any such office by those who have such authority to delegate.

This is quite different than the Roman Catholic assertion that at a man's ordination, a metaphysical change in his person has happened. But this is also quite different than the Protestant assertion that ordination is nothing more than a quaint ceremony. Sometimes the president of the United States is called "the most powerful man in the world." Not so. I'd be willing to wager than any middle linebacker in the NFL could take out President Obama in any kind of a strength competition or fight. What the president has is not personal "power," but rather delegated personal "authority" that he exercises "by virtue of his office." Not even someone more "powerful" than the president can make laws and issue commands to the military. If someone were to attempt to do so lacking authority, it would be a mutiny and a rebellion.

The examples in Scripture of those who assumed and usurped authority not given by the Lord do not end well. Korah's rebellion comes to mind.

And lest we become too smug in the LCMS, I think we should be on guard. We do have deaconesses who are described as "ministers," some even serving in institutional chaplaincies, providing spiritual care to both men and women. I have even seen this work described as being "pastoral" - though there is great care not to turn this adjective into a noun. At some point, the earlier understanding that deaconesses would only teach women and children has been superseded in the LCMS, as deaconesses are now permitted to teach men as well as women and children. What authority they have and do not have seems to be on a sliding scale of gray, and varies with whomever is asked.

But the problem goes well beyond the malleable role of the deaconess. I recently heard firsthand of a "laying on of hands" in the LCMS that involved not only clergy, but the congregational elders (after all, see 1 Tim 4:4...) and the female congregational president as well. I know that sometimes clergy wives are even involved in these ceremonials.

We also have an oxymoronic "office" in the LCMS called "lay minister." Male "lay ministers" have been given "license" for "Word and Sacrament ministry" by district presidents. Female "lay ministers" take the same classes and hold the same synodical designation, yet (to my knowledge) there have not been instances of female "lay ministers" either preaching or presiding over an alleged Sacrament of the Altar. But I do think this toe-to-the-line of the Wisconsonian view of the office of the ministry and the roles of the sexes leaves the possibility open.

One of the most foolish things anyone can ever say is: "It can't happen here."

We in the LCMS have a similar rather limited theology of the sexes as the WELS. We tend to focus on the narrow and myopic legalistic issue of "what women are allowed, and are not allowed, to do" (functionalism) rather than the deeper and eternal issue of what men and women were created to do (ontology). Function ought to flow from ontology rather than trying to reverse-engineer the situation in the opposite direction.

I suspect there are some in our midst who indeed would make the argument that women have the divine authority to bless bread and wine (even as they have the power to physically say the words), that they can indeed also have the churchly permission ("call") to do so as long as no men take the "sacrament" from her hand, and so long as she does not lay claim to the title of "pastor." And there are some that will, no doubt, make a couple arguments in favor of women consecrating based on:

1) The charge of "Donatism." This is the ancient heresy that the validity of the sacrament is based on the moral standing of the officiant. However, sex has nothing to do with moral fitness. It is rather an ontological distinction. For example, men are not denied the privilege of carrying a child in the womb based on a moral reason, it's rather a question of reality and vocation. Just as a good and righteous American citizen can write his name at the end of a bill passed by Congress, the fact is that his righteous signature is not effective whereas that of even a wicked president is - by virtue of authority. A person's sex has nothing at all to do with Donatism.

In fact, the Donatism charge can even go the other way. For example, a very pious and morally upright lay woman can say all the right words over bread and wine without having any authority from God, neither from Scripture nor from the Church, and yet a wicked ordained male pastor with a valid call can do the same thing - and there is no doubt whatsoever of the validity of the sacraments he officiates over.

This is because the issue is authority, not moral fitness.

In fact, there was an interesting conversation between some LCMS seminary professors over this very issue. You can read the initial article about the "validity of churchly acts of ordained [sic] women" here and the rebuttal against the charge of "Neo-Donatism" here.

2) Emergency baptism. The argument goes that if women can "confect the sacrament," so to speak, regarding an emergency baptism, then it follows that she can similarly officiate over celebrations of the Holy Eucharist. But this is a leap of logic that presumes that all sacraments are equal and that we are not bound to any authority in these matters apart from our own modern whims. The crux of the matter is that emergency baptism is just that - a life and death situation. The Church has long established this form of Holy Baptism, and has never denied the fairer sex the extraordinary authority to administer the Holy Sacrament in matters of extremity. However, the same cannot be said for other sacramental and churchly acts. For there are no emergency marriages or confirmations or communions. Our confessions cite the scenario attributed to St. Augustine in which one dying man baptizes the other, and the newly-baptized administers the Sacrament of Holy Absolution to his fellow. There is no mention of any other sacrament or church rite. Most certainly there is no precedent for emergency lay Communion.

Just as female ordination inevitably leads to the blessing of same-sex marriages, I also believe that a functional view of the ministry inexorably leads to women functioning (if not outright claiming to be) pastors. Until we in the LCMS come to grips with the idea of ontology (both of ministers and of the sexes), we will continue to follow in the train of our conservative brethren, even though the tracks have taken a radical turn to the left.

HT: Dr. William J. Tighe

6 comments:


Rev. Eric J Brown said...
What would you say is the connection between "Authority" and Ontology? When I think of these issues, I tend to think of authority first (rather than ontology), but I would wager that there is a fine and strong connection. How might you describe it though?

Past Elder said...
This post has been removed by the author.

Past Elder said...
Interesting that when I was in WELS, it maintained the view of the OHM just as you describe, and saw LCMS as waffling on the authority thing by allowing women voters in congregations, which as far as I know are still not allowed in WELS. As I read and learned more, it was the view of the OHM that was one of three factors that led me to change synods, because, as you point out, without the OHM the rest of it surely follows at some point. (The other two factors, for anyone curious, were local matters and it seeming that almost every blogger I found who understood Lutheranism as I do was LCMS, including our host, though we may part ways re secular music and church polity.)

Father Hollywood said...
Dear Eric: I think authority flows from ontology. For example, the husband has authority in the family because of who he is ontologically - a man. The Lord orders authority in the family not in a functional way (the head of the household being determined by who happens to be functioning as the head on a particular day), but in an ontological way (by virtue of the husband's maleness).

Father Hollywood said...
Dear PE: I think the female suffrage was a case of the church imitating the world. I think it is an example of viewing the Kingdom of God in terms of "rights" instead of seeking ways to serve. This same impetus is what led to women's "ordination" among our former brethren. Sometimes I think the modern Church is embarrassed by looking different than the world.

Thomas Pietsch said...
Father Hollywood, I've been reading and enjoying your blog for some time now, but can't remember if I've ever commented. This post, however, has piqued my interest. I'm a vicar in the Lutheran Church of Australia by the way. I wonder whether Lutherans also believe in an ontological change that is effected at ordination. Just as a baptism changes our ontology, so too does ordination change the ontology of the pastor. We don't re-ordain. Here's Augustine: 'For the sacrament of baptism is what the person possesses who is baptized; and the sacrament of conferring baptism is what he possesses who is ordained. And as the baptized person, if he depart from the unity of the church, does not thereby lose the sacrament of baptism, so also he who is ordained, if he depart from the unity of the church, does not lose the sacrament of conferring baptism.' That said, Lutherans do emphasise that it is Christ who is the consecrator in a way that Roman Catholics do not. Can we have ontological/metaphysical change as well? Regarding the Donatism charge, I think it can be completely reversed. In the LCA a lay person can be commissioned for Word and sacrament ministry, but cannot be called 'Pastor' or vote at Pastors' Conference. It is regrettable, then, that the fault line between those ordained and those who are not comes down to a title and voting rights, and not the Word and sacraments that are the foundation of the office of ministry according to AC XIV. What therefore occurs is a distinction between consecrators of the eucharist - those who are 'Pastors' are those who are not - which is at the very heart of the Donatist controversy. I don't think I'm alone in saying that if I had the choice between going to a lay minister or an ordained pastor I would always choose the latter. So this practice encourage Donatism - distinguishing between eucharists according to the minister. Regarding your last point on the argument that comes from 'emergency baptism', I'm torn between two differing explanations of the tradition preventing 'emergency communion'. Gerhard wrote that holy communion is not 'especially necessary' for salvation as is baptism. Therefore an emergency situation cannot exist. Robert Jenson, on the other hand, thinks that holy communion is too important for an emergency celebration. He writes that while preaching is public and indiscriminate (anyone can receive it), and Baptism and Confession are private and discriminating (they do not directly involve the corporate community), the Eucharist is both discriminating and public. And so a celebration of the eucharist can only involve those publicly ordained into the public office. Communion belongs to the church, not to individuals. So there are two explanations for preventing emergency communion - one because of its lack of importance (to justification) and once because of its great importance (to ecclesiology)! Pax tecum

***

GJ - The only foothold that could be purchased on the rocky ground of WELS logic would be Luther's comment on women preaching to women (allowed). The modern equivalent would be women leading one another in Bible studies and devotions, at their meetings. However, Martin Luther College promoted the concept of women leading men in this area and actively persecuted traditional Lutherans who objected. WELS has defended women teaching men, sponsoring national conferences where that was initiated without bad consequences. One example was the Tiefel pan-denominational worship conference at Carthage (ELCA) College.

Norm Berg promoted open communion in mission congregations. One wit calls it "Don't ask, don't tell" open communion.

The divorced and remarried pastors are gonzo for women's rights, probably because second wifey insists on it.

When all the WELS leaders train at feminist Fuller and feminazi Willow Creek, the products are bound to reflect that education.

If the ELS Board of Doctrine got their chasubles in a bunch over women consecrating in WELS, why not address Church and Chicanery in the Little Sect on the Prairie? Why throw rocks across the ravine when the same ideology is nestled safely in the bosom of Minnesota?

---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Girls Gone Wild - Not About the MLC Video":

Here are some quotes from Luther which speak to the subject of women's roles in the church.
http://www.angelfire.com/ny4/djw/LutherGenderMinistry.pdf

"Rather, priesthood and power have to be there first, brought from baptism and common to all Christians through the faith which builds them upon Christ the true high priest, as St. Peter says here. But to exercise such power and to put it to work is not every man’s business. Only he who is called by the common assembly, or the man representing the assembly’s order and will, does this work in the stead of and as the representative of the common assembly and power." Page 3, second full paragraph

"Mostly the functions of a priest are these: to teach, to preach and proclaim the Word of God, to baptize, to consecrate or administer the Eucharist, to bind and loose sins, to pray for others, to sacrifice, and to judge of all doctrine and spirits. Certainly these are splendid and royal duties. But the first and foremost of all on which everything else depends, is the teaching of the Word of God. For we teach with the Word, we consecrate with the Word, we bind and absolve sins by the Word, we baptize with the Word, we sacrifice with the Word, we judge all things by the Word. Therefore when we grant the Word to anyone, we cannot deny anything to him pertaining to the exercise of his priesthood." Page 7, first full paragraph

"Now you might say: “What kind of situation will arise if it is true that we are all priests and should all preach [1 Peter 2:5]? Should no distinction be made among the people, and should the women, too, be priests?” Answer: In the New Testament no priest has to be tonsured. Not that this is evil in itself, for one surely has the right to have the head shaved clean. But one should not make a distinction between those who do so and the common Christian. Faith cannot tolerate this. Thus those who are now called priests would all be laymen like the others, and only a few officiants would be elected by the congregation to do the preaching. Thus there is only an external difference because of the office to which one is called by the congregation. Before God, however, there is no distinction, and only a few are selected from the whole group to administer the office in the stead of the congregation. They all have the office, but nobody has any more authority than the other person has. Therefore nobody should come forward of his own accord and preach in the congregation. No, one person must be chosen from the whole group and appointed."Page 8, first full paragraph

"As St. Paul says in Gal. 3:28, you must pay no attention to distinctions when you want to look at Christians. You must not say: “This is a man or a woman; this is a servant or a master; this person is old or young.” They are all alike and only a spiritual people. Therefore they are all priests. All may proclaim God’s Word, except that, as St. Paul teaches in 1 Cor. 14:34, women should not speak in the congregation. They should let the men preach, because God commands them to be obedient to their husbands. God does not interfere with the arrangement. But he makes no distinction in the matter of authority." Page 8, first full paragraph

"But in the New Testament the Holy Spirit, speaking through St. Paul, ordained that women should be silent in the churches and assemblies [I Cor. 14:34], and said that this is the Lord’s commandment. Yet he knew that previously Joel [2:28 f.] had proclaimed that God would pour out his Spirit also on handmaidens. Furthermore, the four daughters of Philip prophesied (Acts 21[:9]). But in the congregations or churches where there is a ministry women are to be silent and not preach [I Tim. 2:12]. Otherwise they may pray, sing, praise, and say “Amen,” and read at home, teach one another, exhort, comfort, and interpret the Scriptures as best they can." Page 15, first paragraph

In Christ,
Brett Meyer

Reformation Sunday I




The Seven-Headed Luther is still used as a polemic against the Reformation, even though its lies have been repudiated by Catholics.



Reformation Sunday, I, October 25, 2009

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Bethany Lutheran Worship, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn #258 Lord of Our Life Herzliebster Jesus
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual Eph 5:15-21
The Gospel Matthew 22:1-14
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #370 My Hope Is Built Magdalen

God’s Purpose and Counsel

The Hymn #309 O Jesus Blessed Lord Old Hundredth
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #657 Beautiful Savior

KJV Ephesians 5:15 See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise, 16 Redeeming the time, because the days are evil. 17 Wherefore be ye not unwise, but understanding what the will of the Lord is. 18 And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit; 19 Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord; 20 Giving thanks always for all things unto God and the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ; 21 Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.

KJV Matthew 22:1 And Jesus answered and spake unto them again by parables, and said, 2 The kingdom of heaven is like unto a certain king, which made a marriage for his son, 3 And sent forth his servants to call them that were bidden to the wedding: and they would not come. 4 Again, he sent forth other servants, saying, Tell them which are bidden, Behold, I have prepared my dinner: my oxen and my fatlings are killed, and all things are ready: come unto the marriage. 5 But they made light of it, and went their ways, one to his farm, another to his merchandise: 6 And the remnant took his servants, and entreated them spitefully, and slew them. 7 But when the king heard thereof, he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city. 8 Then saith he to his servants, The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy. 9 Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage. 10 So those servants went out into the highways, and gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests. 11 And when the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment: 12 And he saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? And he was speechless. 13 Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 14 For many are called, but few are chosen.

Collect
Almighty and everlasting God, who by Thy Son hast promised us the forgiveness of sins, righteousness, and everlasting life: We beseech Thee, do Thou by Thy Holy Spirit so quicken our hearts that we in daily prayer may seek our help in Christ against all temptations, and, constantly believing His promise, obtain that for which we pray, and at last be saved, through Thy Son Jesus Christ, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

God’s Purpose and Counsel

Namely, that God in His purpose and counsel ordained [decreed]:
15] 1. That the human race is truly redeemed and reconciled with God through Christ, who, by His faultless [innocency] obedience, suffering, and death, has merited for us the righteousness which avails before God, and eternal life.
16] 2. That such merit and benefits of Christ shall be presented, offered, and distributed to us through His Word and Sacraments.
17] 3. That by His Holy Ghost, through the Word, when it is preached, heard, and pondered, He will be efficacious and active in us, convert hearts to true repentance, and preserve them in the true faith.
18] 4. That He will justify all those who in true repentance receive Christ by a true faith, and will receive them into grace, the adoption of sons, and the inheritance of eternal life.
19] 5. That He will also sanctify in love those who are thus justified, as St. Paul says, Eph. 1:4.
20] 6. That He also will protect them in their great weakness against the devil, the world, and the flesh, and rule and lead them in His ways, raise them again [place His hand beneath them], when they stumble, comfort them under the cross and in temptation, and preserve them [for life eternal].
21] 7. That He will also strengthen, increase, and support to the end the good work which He has begun in them, if they adhere to God's Word, pray diligently, abide in God's goodness [grace], and faithfully use the gifts received.
22] 8. That finally He will eternally save and glorify in life eternal those whom He has elected, called, and justified.
23] And [indeed] in this His counsel, purpose, and ordination God has prepared salvation not only in general, but has in grace considered and chosen to salvation each and every person of the elect who are to be saved through Christ, also ordained that in the way just mentioned He will, by His grace, gifts, and efficacy, bring them thereto [make them participants of eternal salvation], aid, promote, strengthen, and preserve them.
Election, Solid Declaration, Formula of Concord, Book of Concord

We are observing two consecutive Sundays for the Reformation, since so many Lutheran congregations refuse to honor the Reformation, calling it “Unity Sunday” and “Reconciliation Sunday.” We stopped at a Tulsa LCMS congregation for directions to the Aquarium, and they advertised a Unity Sunday coming up. I suggest calling it Friendship Sunday and inviting a Roman Catholic priest to preach. Wisconsin Lutheran College did that with Archbishop Weakland and a group of priests. When Roman leaders from around the world met for Vatican II, they affirmed all the glorious decrees of Vatican I, including the Infallibility of the Pope. Lutherans have back-pedaled from the Reformation while Catholics have increased the height, width, and depth of their apostasy.

The passage above, from the Formula of Concord, is a summary of the Biblical message. The New Testament contains many similar summaries. Confessions of faith are good to compare since they are saying – This is what the Word of God teaches. A confession is always secondary to the Scriptures, so we call our Book of Concord – the ruled norm, the norma normata, ruled by the Scriptures. The Word of God is the ruling norm – norma normans.

Namely, that God in His purpose and counsel ordained [decreed]:

15] 1. That the human race is truly redeemed and reconciled with God through Christ, who, by His faultless [innocency] obedience, suffering, and death, has merited for us the righteousness which avails before God, and eternal life.

This is a clear summary of the Atonement of Christ, using the Biblical words – redeemed and reconciled. God ordained this Atonement so that no one could ever question whether it was universal, applying to all people for all time, and objective – true whether anyone believes or not. The Atonement is not justification and was never taught as justification until the Pietists tried to merge Reformed doctrine with Lutheran doctrine and ended up with…Reformed doctrine. Some would say, “Why don’t the Reformed teach this combination now?” They do – only they call themselves Universalists and Unitarians. God has done everything so everyone is forgiven, they imagine. That is also what Universal Objective Justification teaches.

The Atonement is our comfort - that no sin is so great that we cannot be forgiven. The sin against the Holy Spirit is rejection of the Gospel at the point of death, because that is saying, “I do not need forgiveness through the merits of Christ.” Faith in Christ does indeed matter, as subsequent statements declare in the Formula of Concord.

But first, we need to know how the benefits of Christ’s death come to us:

16] 2. That such merit and benefits of Christ shall be presented, offered, and distributed to us through His Word and Sacraments.

This is a concise summary of the Means or Instruments of Grace. God ordained the Atonement as the ultimate sacrifice for the sins of man. He also bound Himself to the Word and Sacraments as the ways in which we would receive this forgiveness. As Luther said, and we confess – the Atonement is the great treasure of the Gospel. The Means of Grace are the Word and Sacraments, the Holy Spirit distributing this treasure to each one of us. We always know the source of forgiveness, and we know this is objectively true, not based on our feelings, virtue, or works.

Seeking forgiveness, we always know where forgiveness is found. The liturgical worship service, continued from Old Testament times, gives us an abundance of the Law and Gospel, so we acknowledge our need for our Savior and receive what He so abundantly offers.

17] 3. That by His Holy Ghost, through the Word, when it is preached, heard, and pondered, He will be efficacious and active in us, convert hearts to true repentance, and preserve them in the true faith.

The Formula of Concord was written after decades of attack from Roman Catholics and non-Lutheran Protestants. The Concordists’ battles with non-Lutheran Protestants included the Zwinglian influence from Switzerland and the Anabaptists in Germany, not to mention the first Unitarians (Poland). We generally say “the Reformed” but I want to emphasize that denials of the Means of Grace came in various disguises.

So the question comes up repeatedly: How do we know that forgiveness has come to us, that we are truly forgiven?

The Biblical answer is clear – The Holy Spirit is always effective (efficacious) in creating godly contrition in our hearts through the preaching of the Law. The Holy Spirit is also efficacious and active in us when the Gospel produces faith in the Savior and nurtures or preserves that faith.

Man is anxious and wants certainty in the effectiveness of his congregation or religious association. God’s Word says - faithfulness to the Scriptures is success; the steward of the mysteries of God has one requirement – that he be found faithful. When that is turned around and focused on numbers (budget and parking lot acreage), anxiety increases and no God-pleasing success is possible.

The Rock N Roll “Lutheran” sermon at the beginning of this year revealed this truth. The sermon noted the need to pray for more members, to invite more people, and to get a $200,000 grant for a worship leader. There was no need for doctrinal faithfulness and trust in God’s Word. Instead, the rock band was replaced with another group, to encourage visible success rather than Scriptural fidelity.

This shows the power of God’s Word, because apostasy leads to even more hardening of the heart. The final result is a blind rage that hates the truth and delivers people to eternal damnation, unless someone wakes them up with the true Gospel. One friend recently confessed that he was finally delivered from a Seeker Sensitive church, yet some Lutherans pursue that model as something good, because it promises results. The results are clear:

KJV 2 Thessalonians 2:10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

18] 4. That He will justify all those who in true repentance receive Christ by a true faith, and will receive them into grace, the adoption of sons, and the inheritance of eternal life.

The declaration of forgiveness (justification) is always associated with receiving Christ, His Promises, in faith. The distribution of the treasure is constant, in preaching and teaching, but not everyone trusts the Gospel. Some do trust the Gospel for years and decades, but lose that trust for various reasons (Parable of the Sower, Mark 4, Matthew 13). The truth of the Gospel does not depend on its reception, its outward success. The truth of the Gospel belongs to God and can never be altered in any way, no matter what man may say, declare, or confess.
Justification is not making a decision. The Holy Spirit changes our hearts through the Word to make us willing recipients of the Gospel, through the Law, and creates that faith to embrace the Gospel Promises.

We are not divine robots. We have the freedom to turn away from the truth and embrace falsehood. Many people fall for the vices of the world or the evil desires of the heart and corrupt their faith to the point of no return. Although godly contrition is always possible, even at the hour of death, many have deceived and blinded themselves to the point where they know nothing but the fear of death (Pope Pius 12, Paul Tilich). Truly, the last state is worst than the first. Some have fallen from the faith, denying God, and are more difficult to reach than the ordinary atheist. That is why atheist groups covet former clergy who love to say, “I used to be a conservative Lutheran minister.” Ah, what a prize, to have the scalp of Lutheran minister who deceived himself into defending Church Growth and fell into adultery. As Walther said, the loss of faith comes first. The outward carnal sins come along second.

19] 5. That He will also sanctify in love those who are thus justified, as St. Paul says, Eph. 1:4.
20] 6. That He also will protect them in their great weakness against the devil, the world, and the flesh, and rule and lead them in His ways, raise them again [place His hand beneath them], when they stumble, comfort them under the cross and in temptation, and preserve them [for life eternal].

God reaches out to give us the Law and Gospel, to convert us into believers, and make us members of His Kingdom. But He does not stop there. He makes us holy, giving us the righteousness of Christ, and causes the Gospel to produce the fruits of the Spirit in our lives. He continuously helps us and protects us against the snares of Satan, giving us comfort and strength in the midst of temptation. So God makes us part of His Kingdom and gives us willing hearts to enjoy the spiritual blessings of that Kingdom.

KJV Ephesians 5:15 but be filled with the Spirit; 19 Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord; 20 Giving thanks always for all things unto God and the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ; 21 Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.

Notice that the cross is included in this statement. Nothing is clearer than this – the cross always accompanies the Word, as it did with Christ and His apostles. If we do not take up the cross daily, we are not worthy to be His disciples, as Jesus admonishes us. Therefore, presenting the Theology of Glory to supplant the Theology of the Cross is a gross and carnal rejection of the Gospel itself. Telling people they will be more popular, relaxed, and wealthy because of the Gospel is a blatant seduction of the Old Adam in the listeners by the Old Adam in the minister. Gatherings to tickle the Old Adam are always going to be popular, as witnessed by various thriving institutions. But they do not advance the Kingdom of God. If the Old Adam is not converted, in the name of success religion, the church involved is worse than the most evil den of vice in the land, worse than the lowest crack-house, etc. Worse because the cross of Christ is rejected in the name of Christ. No greater blasphemy can be imagined.

And yet, conservative Lutherans gladly join in fellowship with Willow Creek Community Church, and brag about their membership on that odious website. I was there at Willow Creek and had to search out one instance of a cross in the building, finding one in the basement, but none outside or in the Sneaker Service entertainment area. Certainly not in their pricey Food Court.

22] 8. That finally He will eternally save and glorify in life eternal those whom He has elected, called, and justified.
23] And [indeed] in this His counsel, purpose, and ordination God has prepared salvation not only in general, but has in grace considered and chosen to salvation each and every person of the elect who are to be saved through Christ, also ordained that in the way just mentioned He will, by His grace, gifts, and efficacy, bring them thereto [make them participants of eternal salvation], aid, promote, strengthen, and preserve them.

God’s plan, so clearly revealed to us, is that He will give us the spiritual blessings of this life—with the cross—along with the blessings of eternal life. That means whoever believes can be assured that God has elected, called, and justified him in faith. We know the source and meaning of this great treasure so we return to this treasure in our poverty and weakness, confident in the power of the Gospel to restore us.

Quotations
"The modern radical spirit which would sweep away the Formula of Concord as a Confession of the Church, will not, in the end, be curbed, until it has swept away the Augsburg Confession, and the ancient Confessions of the Church--yea, not until it has crossed the borders of Scripture itself, and swept out of the Word whatsoever is not in accord with its own critical mode of thinking. The far-sighted rationalist theologian and Dresden court preacher, Ammon, grasped the logic of a mere spirit of progress, when he said: 'Experience teaches us that those who reject a Creed, will speedily reject the Scriptures themselves.'" Theodore E. Schmauk and C. Theodore Benze, The Confessional Principle and the Confessions, as Embodying the Evangelical Confession of the Christian Church, Philadelphia: General Council Publication Board, 1911, p. 685.

"Early in the morning it rises, sits upon a twig and sings a song it has learned, while it knows not where to obtain its food, and yet it is not worried as to where to get its breakfast. Later, when it is hungry, it flies away and seeks a grain of corn, where God stored one away for it, of which it never thought while singing, when it had cause enough to be anxious about its food. Ay, shame on you now, that the little birds are more pious and believing than you; they are happy and sing with joy and know not whether they have anything to eat." Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed. John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, V, p. 114. Matthew 6:24-34.

"Since now, in the sight of God and of all Christendom [the entire Church of Christ], we wish to testify to those now living and those who shall come after us that this declaration herewith presented concerning all the controverted articles aforementioned and explained, and no other, is our faith, doctrine, and confession, in which we are also willing, by God's grace, to appear with intrepid hearts before the judgment-seat of Jesus Christ, and give an account of it; and that we will neither privately nor publicly speak or write anything contrary to it, but, by the help of God's grace, intend to abide thereby: therefore, after mature deliberation, we have, in God's fear and with the invocation of His name, attached our signatures with our own hands."
Formula of Concord, SD, XII. #40. Other Factions and Sects. Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 1103. Tappert, p. 636. Heiser, p. 296.

"The Lutheran Church is a doctrinal Church. She attaches supreme importance to pure doctrine. The preaching and teaching of God's pure Word is her central activity. Say the Confessors: 'The true adornment of the churches is godly, useful, and clear doctrine.' (Triglotta, p. 401)"
W. A. Baepler, "Doctrine, True and False," The Abiding Word, ed., Theodore Laetsch, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1946, II, p. 496.

"Let him therefore who is concerned about his life not be taken in by the friendliness of heretics to agree with their doctrine. Neither let him be offended at my faults, who am a teacher, but let him consider the doctrine itself." [Origen, Homily 7, on Ezekiel]
Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1971, I, p. 154.

"But now I ought not to quote the Nicean, nor you the Ariminensian Council, as if to judge beforehand. I will not be bound by the authority of this, nor you by the authority of that. On the authority of the Scriptures and not on any one's own, but on the common witnesses of both, let matter contend with matter, cause with cause, reason with reason." [Augustine, Contra Maximum, Book 3, chap. 14]
Martin Chemnitz, Examination of the Council of Trent, trans., Fred Kramer, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1971, I, p. 155.
"What is the reason for certainty in Christian doctrine?...7. the hatred of the devil over against this doctrine;
David Chytraeus, A Summary of the Christian Faith (1568), trans., Richard Dinda, Decatur: Repristination Press, 1994. p. 21.

"The worst of all is, that we must not only suffer shame, persecution and death; but that the world rejoices because of our great loss and misfortunes. This is indeed very hard and bitter. Sure it shall thus come to pass, for the world will rejoice when it goes ill with us; but this comfort we have that their joy shall not last long, and our sorrow shall be turned into eternal joy."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 80. Third Sunday after Easter John 16:16-23.

"For it is not possible for those not to be offended in Christ who walk by sight and feeling and do not adhere firmly to the Word."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, I, p. 23.

"Perhaps you look about and think: What, could so many people be wrong all at once? Beware, and do not let their number trouble you; hold fast to God's Word; He cannot deceive you, though all mankind be false, as indeed the Scriptures say, Psalm 116:11: 'All men are liars.'"
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, I, p. 416. Epiphany Matthew 2:1-12.

"It is true, the injury is not so glaring, and it appears to be much worse if a person's head is struck off, than if a false prophet or writer comes forward; but a false sermon, yea even a false word, which comes whirling along in God's name, will cut off a great number of souls, so that an entire city or country may fall under it."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, IV, p. 386. Twelfth Sunday after Trinity, Second Sermon Mark 7:31-37.

"Perhaps you look about and think: What, could so many people be wrong all at once? Beware, and do not let their number trouble you; hold fast to God's Word; He cannot deceive you, though all mankind be false, as indeed the Scriptures say, Psalm 116:11: 'All men are liars.'"
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, I, p. 416. Epiphany Matthew 2:1-12. Psalm 116:11.
"The doctrine may well be correctly taught by a person even though his life is evil. Bad doctrine is a thousand times more harmful than a bad life."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 846.

"All the others also say that they are teaching the Word of God. No devil, heretic, or sectarian spirit arises who says: I, the devil, or a heretic, am preaching my own views. On the contrary, all know how to say: This is not my doctrine; it is God's Word."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 640.

"Error and heresy must come into the world so that the elect may become approved and manifest. Their coming is in the best interests of Christians if they take the proper attitude toward it. St. Augustine, who certainly was sufficiently annoyed by wretched sectaries, says that when heresy and offense come, they produce much benefit in Christendom; for they Christians industriously to read Holy Scriptures and with diligence to pursue it and persevere in its study. Otherwise they might let it lie on the shelf, become very secure, and say: Why, God's Word and the text of Scripture are current and in our midst; it is not necessary for us to read Holy Scripture."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 639.

"The devil has the advantage of being able to find pupils for a doctrine or a dream no matter how absurd the doctrine or the dream may be. The more absurd it is the sooner he finds pupils."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 632. WLS #1940 Mark 7:31-37.

"However, if anything is undertaken against the Word, faith, and the honor of God, we are in no wise to preserve silence, are to bear it far less patiently. Then we should offer stubborn resistance."
What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, III, p. 1308. Sermon, 1523

"Hence everything here depends only upon this, that you rightly learn to look upon Christ according to the Word, and not according to your own thoughts and feelings, for human thoughts are frauds and lies, but His Word is true and cannot lie."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, IV, p. 92. Third Sunday after Trinity, Second Sermon Luke 15:1-10.

"This is going through closed doors, when He comes into the heart through the Word, not breaking nor displacing anything. For when the Word of God comes, it neither injures the conscience, nor deranges the understanding of the heart and the external senses; as the false teachers do who break all the doors and windows, breaking through like thieves, leaving nothing whole and undamaged, and perverting, falsifying and injuring all life, conscience, reason, and the senses. Christ does not do thus."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 355. First Sunday after Easter John 20:19-31.

"But when St. Peter stood up and preached, they made a mockery of it and considered the apostles drunken fools. When they had urged the Gospel a long time, they gathered together three thousand men and women. But what were they among so many? Yea, no one could discern that the Gospel had accomplished anything, for all things continued in the same state as before. No change was seen, and scarcely anyone knew that there were Christians there. And so it will be at all times."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 306. Easter Tuesday Luke 24:36-47.

"Be not worried because of this! for even though a man preach and continue in the Gospel for many years, he must still lament and say: Aye, no one will come, and all continue in their former state. Therefore you must not let that grieve or terrify you."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 305. Easter Tuesday Luke 24:36-47.

"He permits it to happen that many great saints err and stumble, in order that we may not trust in men, though they be many, great, and holy. We must be led to rely upon the Word that is sure and cannot deceive, as here these two men, and all the others afterward, were directed to the Scriptures."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 290. Easter Monday Luke 24:13-35.

"All preaching of sin and God's wrath is a preaching of the Law, no matter how or when it may be done. On the other hand, the Gospel is such preaching as sets forth and bestows nothing but grace and forgiveness in Christ. And yet it is true that the Apostles and preachers of the Gospel sanctioned the preaching of the Law, as Christ Himself did, and began with this in the case of those who had not yet acknowledged their sins and had felt no fear of God's anger."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, IV, p. 158. Fifth Sunday after Trinity Luke 5:1-11.

"You may tie a hog ever so well, but you cannot prevent it from grunting, until it is strangled and killed. Thus it is with the sins of the flesh."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 247. Easter, Second Sermon Mark 16:1-8.

"The Holy Spirit is given to none except to those who are in sorrow and fear; in them it produces good fruit. This gift is so precious and worthy that God does not cast it before dogs. Though the unrepentant discover it themselves, hearing it preached, they devour it and know not what they devour."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 281f. Pentecost Sunday John 14:23-31.

"Godly and believing persons know their sins; they bear all their punishment patiently, and are resigned to God's judgment without the least murmur; therefore, they are punished only bodily, and here in time, and their pain and suffering have an end. Unbelievers, however, since they are not conscious of their sins and transgressions, cannot bear God's punishment patiently, but they resent it and wish their life and works to go unpunished, yea, uncensured. Hence, their punishment and suffering are in body and soul, here in time, and last forever beyond this life."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 131. Fourth Sunday after Easter, Second Sermon John 16:5-15.

"Therefore the Holy Spirit rightly and justly convicts, as sinful and condemned, all who have not faith in Christ. For where this is wanting, other sins in abundance must follow: God is despised and hated, and the entire first table is treated with disobedience."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, III, p. 141. Fourth Sunday after Easter, Third Sermon John 16:5-15.
"A hardened heart will not be instructed, no matter how plainly and clearly the truth is presented; but the faith of the righteous is strengthened when they see that the ground of their faith is right and good."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, II, p. 157. Third Sunday in Lent Luke 11:14-23.

"Christ, in the saying we have quoted from Matthew (24:45), tells us further, the servant of the household should be not only faithful, but also wise, able to discern between the mysteries of God and the mysteries of the devil, that he may safely guard and keep himself and those committed to his care. For, as Paul says in 2 Corinthians 11:13-14, false apostles sometimes fashion themselves into true apostles of Christ, even as the devil transforms himself into an angel of light."
Sermons of Martin Luther, 8 vols., ed., John Nicholaus Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VI, p. 77. Third Sunday in Advent, 1 Corinthians 4:1-5, Matthew 24:45; 2 Corinthians 11:13-14

"You cannot of a truth be for true doctrine without being unalterably opposed to false doctrine. There can be no 'positive theology' where the God-given negatives have been eliminated from the Decalog."
Norman A. Madson, Preaching to Preachers, Mankato: Lutheran Synod Book Company, 1952 Preface.
"...and Luther asked that his early writings be read 'with much charity,' since they were not yet entirely free from Romish errors."
Francis Pieper, Christian Dogmatics, 3 vols., trans., Walter W. F. Albrecht, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1950, I, p. 89. SL XIV, 439; also XIX, 293, 296

"When the time comes that the worldly shall gnash their teeth, they shall witness all the elect and angels saying to God: 'This man has been a faithful minister and teacher. He has proclaimed the saving Word of God to a world of castaways. On yonder earth he was despised, persecuted, and maligned, but he shines now as a star with imperishable luster.'"
C. F. W. Walther, The Proper Distinction between Law and Gospel, trans., W. H. T. Dau, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1928, p. 402. Daniel 12:3.

Why Do Anglicans Take Risks For What They Believe - Even When Wrong - And Lutherans Do Not?

Senior Anglican bishop reveals he is ready to convert to Roman Catholicism

The Rt Rev John Hind, the Bishop of Chichester, has announced he is considering becoming a Roman Catholic in a move that could spark an exodus of clergy.


The Rt Rev John Hind, the Bishop of Chichester, has announced he is considering becoming a Roman Catholic in a move that could spark an exodus of clergy.

Hundreds of traditionalist clergy could join the exodus, though most are waiting for the exact details of the new apostolic constitution to be published Photo: CHRISTOPHER PLEDGER

Bishop Hind said he would be "happy" to be reordained as a Catholic priest and said that divisions in Anglicanism could make it impossible to stay in the church.

He is the most senior Anglican to admit that he is prepared to accept the offer from the Pope, who shocked the Church of England last week when he paved the way for clergy to convert to Catholicism in large numbers.
In a further blow to the Archbishop of Canterbury's hopes of preventing the Anglican Communion from disintegrating, other bishops have cast doubt over its survival.
The Rt Rev John Broadhurst, the Bishop of Fulham, even claimed that "the Anglican experiment is over". He said it has been shown to be powerless to cope with the crises over gays and women bishops.

In one of the most significant developments since the Reformation, the Pope last week announced that a new structure would be set up to allow disaffected Anglicans to enter full communion with Rome, while maintaining parts of their Protestant heritage.

The move comes after secret talks between the Vatican and a group of senior Anglican bishops. Dr Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, was not informed of the meetings and his advisers even denied that they had taken place when the Sunday Telegraph broke the story last year.
Now Bishop Hind, the most senior traditionalist in the Church of England, has confirmed that he is willing to sacrifice his salary and palace residence to defect to the Catholic Church.

"This is a remarkable new step from the Vatican," he said. "At long last there are some choices for Catholics in the Church of England. I'd be happy to be reordained into the Catholic Church."
While the bishop stressed that this would depend on his previous ministry being recognised, he said that the divisions in the Anglican Communion could make it impossible to stay.

"How can the Church exist if bishops are not in full communion with each other," he said.
Conservative archbishops and bishops have broken ties with their liberal counterparts following the US Episcopal Church's consecration of Gene Robinson, the first openly gay bishop.
Bishop Broadhurst said that the Pope has made his offer in response to the pleas of Anglicans who despair at the disintegration of their Church.

"Anglicanism has become a joke because it has singularly failed to deal with any of its contentious issues," said the bishop, who is chairman of Forward in Faith, the Anglo-Catholic network that represents around 1,000 traditionalist priests.

"There is widespread dissent across the [Anglican] Communion. We are divided in major ways on major issues and the Communion has unravelled.
"I believed in the Church I joined, but it has been revealed to have no doctrine of its own.
"I personally think it has gone past the point of no return. The Anglican experiment is over."
The Rt Rev Martyn Jarrett, the Bishop of Beverley, also said there were questions over the church's survival, adding that the Church of England has changed too dramatically for some traditionalists.
"They are beginning to reflect that the theological position of the Church isn't what they believe," he said.

"The offer from the Vatican is momentous and I felt a great sense of gratitude that the Roman Catholic Church is thinking about the position of traditionalist Anglicans."

Clergy at the Forward in Faith conference, which met in Westminster yesterday, expressed relief that the Pope had provided them with an escape route. ["Its Articles, Homilies, and Liturgy have been a great bulwark of Protestantism; and yet, seemingly, out of the very stones of that bulwark has been framed, in our day, a bridge on which many have passed over into Rome...It harbors a skepticism which takes infidelity  by the hand, and a revised medievalism which longs to throw itself, with tears, on the neck of the Pope and the Patriarch, to beseech them to be gentle and not to make the terms of restored fellowship too difficult." Charles P. Krauth]

Fr Ed Tomlinson, vicar of St Barnabas, Tunbridge Wells, said that he would be following the lead of Bishop Hind.

"The ship of Anglicanism seems to be going down," he said. "We should be grateful that a lifeboat has been sent.

"I shall be seeking to move to Rome. To stay in the Church of England would be suicide."
Hundreds of traditionalist clergy could join the exodus, though most are waiting for the exact details of the new apostolic constitution to be published.
Battles lie ahead over whether priests who leave to join the Catholic Church will be allowed to take their churches with them, but some bishops have already warned against property seizure.
Dr Williams was only informed of the details of the Pope's decree last weekend and is understood to have been "implacably opposed" to the move.
Lord Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, said he was "appalled" that his successor was given such short notice and was excluded from discussions on the issue.

The Rt Rev Gregory Cameron, Bishop of St Asaph and a close colleague of Dr Williams, said that the archbishop was likely to be saddened by the developments.
"Rowan has worked very hard for unity both within the Anglican Communion, and with Rome, and I suspect he may feel that what has happened is little short of a betrayal, not by the Catholic Church, but by some of those in his own ranks."
"He is likely to be saddened that they felt driven to seek such a radical solution and that some of them now feel they have to go."
"Up until now, the Roman Catholic Church has been putting its weight behind Rowan, but now it is appearing to put its weight behind the conservative groups it can most easily win over."
"The danger is that they'll have every disaffected Anglican beating down the pathway to their door and asking for special treatment."

The Sunday Telegraph can disclose that the planning behind last week's announcement began in 2006, when the Pope asked the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to consider how they could invite Anglicans into the Roman Catholic fold.

He had reached out to disillusioned Anglicans three years earlier, when as head of the Congregation, the most powerful of the Vatican's departments and successor to the medieval Inquisition, he wrote a personal letter to Anglicans in America. He reassured them of the Catholic Church's support of their stand against the liberal tide.

***

GJ - I have followed Episcopal apostasy from the beginning of this blog, staying in contact with David Virtue of Virtue Online, The Voice for Global Orthodox Anglicanism.

At Notre Dame, our good friend was Father Charlie Caldwell, a traditional Episcopalian who longed for reunion with Rome. Unlike most of the doctoral students, Charlie believed in God and angels. I put the Time cover photo of Charlie's Angels on his student office door at the library. Some dowdy feminist tore it down.

Anglican clergy are abandoning their own institutions to become Roman Catholic priests. Tony Blair poped after leaving office as PM.

In America, Episcopal priests and bishops are defending themselves in court for leaving the Episcopal Church, USA, while Archfiend Katharine Jefferts-Schori spends millions to take away their property, extending the Left Foot of Fellowship in the process.

My question is - why are Lutherans so afraid to take any risks to defend the faith? 

The Wisconsin Synod is supposed to have standards about fellowship. So is the Little Sect on the Prairie. Nevertheless, WELS congregations may be full-fledged members of another denomination (Purpose-Driven, Rick Warren - or Willow Creek, Bill Hybels) without any bad consequences. I was going to write - without consequences, but the apostate pastors are rewarded for the infidelity.

Church and Chicanery hero Jeff Gunn is a board member of Wisconsin Lutheran College. The president of that college came from his church. Another board member is from his church. CrossWalk could not join WELS, by vote of their own Cal-Az district, but Gunn was able to join Rick Warren's group and remain a WELS pastor. How does that happen?

Willowcreek Lutheran Chapel, formerly known as Wisconsin Lutheran Chapel, celebrated its anniversary with Archheretic Paul Calvin Kelm preaching.

Various WELS congregations have celebrated Warren's Sporty Days of Porpoise, without negative consequences. In fact, WELS has been kelming Fuller/CG materials for decades, including one by David Valleskey, past Mequon seminary president.

Meanwhile, WELS pastors are scared to death about repudiating this nonsense, and that starts with the spineless Doctrinal Pussycats. Blame yourselves, laity and clergy - you keep electing those DPs. Not one was elected to say, "Here I stand, I can do no other." For good reason they have their breakfast meetings at The Waffle House.

Issues in WELS shut itself down and erased all files. Speak softly in Jerusalem lest ye be heard on the streets of Gath, o confessional Lutherans. Church and Change has at least six parachurch organizations within WELS, guided by Chicanery leaders, all of them producing programs and literature.

I believe the major reason for hands off the union congregations and Chicanery off-shoots is this: Missouri dread. The institutional leaders have scared themselves silly with the thought of those pastors, congregations, and fat cats leaving WELS for the LCMS. Jeske has already done joint worship with Missouri (no spanking), joint work with Missouri (ditto for his RSO Missouri status), and rock star speaking engagements ("The clever men at Oxford Know all that there is to be knowed. But they none of them know one half as much As intelligent Mr. Toad!" - Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows, Ch. 10. - Summary of his Concordia Mequon speech.)

Many laity, waking up to the decades of betrayal wrought by their ordained leaders, say, "If they go, good riddance."