Monday, May 10, 2010

They Are Bad Bloggers Too


Caught squeezing the Charmin.



wildcard (http://wildcard.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "Note the List of Foreign Countries":

We know the Shrinkers cannot even operate a blog. They are too lazy. Just look at the counterfeit Ichabod with all its slander and rubbish remarks.

Frankly, they stand for failure in most things that they attempt to do.

***

GJ - The fake blogger has no doctrinal discernment at all, so his denunciations are especially comical.

I recall that he raved about my kelming of graphics, but he has kelmed mine many times, without asking permission. The Shrinkers have called for lawsuits against me, but I have only two objections so far. One was from a paid site, so I reduced the kelmed portion to a link. Another asked me to link and quote more precisely, which I did. That is a fair record for 4,100+ posts.

The general rule about graphics is that they can be altered as satire. I look for material in the public domain.

In the past, the Shrinkers complained that I quoted them "out of context." I began using much longer quotations, always giving the exact source, but the howling remained.

One Lutheran said, "It is amusing that they have tried so hard to silence you, and they still have to deal with you anyway."

I have not found an adequate WELS Shrinker blog. Ski hardly writes. He finally realized I was quoting his Tweets, so that stopped (along with Glende's and a few others). I tracked Tweets from Katie for a time, but it was same old buzzing all the time. It is no longer news that Ski, Katie, and Glende go to Schwaermer conferences with the approval of Deputy Doug Englebrecht, possibly the worst WELS DP, except for Mark Jeske's bodyguard man-servant DP.

The Church and Change website is sloppy, badly edited, and revealing. They are endlessly caught between their fever to promote themselves and their obsessive need for secrecy. At what point do they think they have fooled us about the leadership coming from the Gurgle bros, Mark Jeske, Patterson, Jim Huebner, and other Calvinists?

Their problem is not that I have lied but that I have told the truth and documented it.

Slander is a basic management tool of WELS, so when they howl "Slander!" they really mean, "Stop revealing how corrupt and dishonest we really are."

To stop these marauding, adulterous thieves, who rob widows and orphans while mocking the Word and Sacraments, a force must be applied against them, equal to or greater than the force of their false doctrine.


rhs (http://rhs.myopenid.com/) has left a new comment on your post "They Are Bad Bloggers Too":

To stop these marauding, adulterous thieves, who rob widows and orphans while mocking the Word and Sacraments, a force must be applied against them, equal to or greater than the force of their false doctrine.

Just who is their god? They smugly insist that they do it for god. Their infirm god needs them to “rob widows and orphans?” Their lame god cannot create all the money that they want? They really are false teachers and preachers.

***

GJ - A man left his estate to WELS with the provision that his widow be supported. This case is called MilCraft or the Golf estate. I may have Golf misspelled. WELS wrecked the prosperous business. The widow had to go to court to get the money wasted by WELS. The synod did not want to pay. The court listened to the facts and found for the widow, forcing WELS to ante up $1 million. That just about pushed WELS over the edge financially. Gurgle was the genius DP in charge of this fiasco. Therefore, the conservative made him their dream candidate for SP, where he did the same with the Schwan millions. That is the plot behind my hilarious parody - "Where Have All the Schwan Bucks Gone?" Now Gurgle is working with Kudu Don Patterson.


If the widow's case moved along as most lawsuits do, her lawyer asked the synod to settle out of court, to save everyone time and money. It is clear that the synod refused to accept responsibility, so robbing a widow was OK with them. It took a secular court to reverse the robbery, doubtless an unpleasant experience for the widow. Imagine what her late husband would have thought - his business ruined and his widow robbed at the same time.

When all this was done and the matter was public, WELS said, "We have to be careful about the gifts we accept from now on." It is difficult to attribute actions and claims like these to believers.