LPC has left a new comment on your post "Introduction to the Deutschlander UOJ Essay, 1977":
Pr GJ.
This is where Prof Deustchlander's scholarship goes down the tubes. Note what he said ... But even that is not really sufficient or suitable for stating the orthodox position in a clear and unequivocal manner. For our Fathers it was not difficult at all to consider objective and subjective justification under the same heading, and they were apparently unaware of any need to separate them or distinguish between them
First the admission of difficulty of establishing the theory without equivocation and then he goes into the brains of the BoC Fathers claiming so and so. He says, "they were apparently unaware"....?
I like to suggest to him that the BoC Fathers were unaware because they knew of only one justification that is JBFA.
This is wild and rampant anachronism and reckless abandonment to one's imagination also, an absolute argument from silence. Only a person bullied into submission can accept this argumentation.
If someone accepts this as evidence that UOJ should be believed, then I suggest by the same method, he accepts my proof that the BoC Fathers believed in UFOs also.
LPC
