Friday, January 7, 2011

Robert Preus Changed


Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Knapp's Double-Justification Has Consequences.":

Robert Preus was kind enough to emphatically disclose that Universal Objective Justification is not synonymous with the Atonement.

"Objective justification which is God’s verdict of acquittal over the whole world is not identical with the atonement, it is not another way of expressing the fact that Christ has redeemed the world. Rather it is based upon the substitutionary work of Christ, or better, it is a part of the atonement itself. It is God’s response to all that Christ died to save us, God’s verdict that Christ’s work is finished, that He has been indeed reconciled, propitiated; His anger has been stilled and He is at peace with the world, and therefore He has declared the entire world in Christ to be righteous."

http://www.reclaimingwalther.org/articles/jmc00225.htm

---

From Luther vs. the UOJ Pietists:



Dr. Robert Preus is known for advocating UOJ in the 1980s, when Concordia Seminary in Ft. Wayne was also deep into Church Growth Enthusiasm. In his last book, in spite of editing from his sons, his clear stances against UOJ is obvious.

But the imputation of Christ's righteousness to the sinner takes place when the Holy Spirit brings him to faith through Baptism and the Word of the Gospel. Our sins were imputed to Christ at His suffering and death, imputed objectively after He, by His active and passive obedience, fulfilled and procured all righteousness for us. But the imputation of His righteousness to us takes place when we are brought to faith.[1] 

The Enthusiasts often mention Calov as their champion, knowing that almost no one has access to Calov’s books. Preus, who knew this period of Lutheran orthodoxy quite well, quoted this statement from Calov with approval -

Although Christ has acquired for us the remission of sins, justification, and sonship, God just the same does not justify us prior to our faith. Nor do we become God's children in Christ in such a way that justification in the mind of God takes place before we believe.[2]

I understand these two passages to be a repudiation of UOJ and an apology for all the harm done in the name of that fad.


[1] Robert D. Preus Justification and Rome, St. Louis: Concordia Academic Press 1997, p. 72.
[2] Apodixis Articulorum Fide, Lueneburg, 1684. Cited in Robert D. Preus Justification and Rome, St. Louis: Concordia Academic Press 1997, p. 131n.