Except for Artful Dodger, no one has responded to the posts about Walther as a Pietist, kidnapper, mob organizer, and thief.
-
This is actually the highest level of response to an concept.
- Agreement - That is not worth posting. Most blogs post at this level, so they can exchange slobbering praise among the other bloggers who do exactly the same thing.
- Anger - That post is worth publishing because it challenges the norms of self-deception.
- Silence - They take great pains to avoid linking the blog and using the research in an obvious way. They pay their SP $250,000 a year in salary and benefits to keep people from posting with their real names. On Facebook, they unfriend the author while friending the people they supposedly oppose. They tremble in their rabbit warrens, fearful that someone suspects an association with Ichabod. And they sigh among their pals, many of whom are synod stooges, "Isn't it terrible how bad things are today?"


3 comments:
Or, it could be that no one really cares whether Walther did those things or not. This, I suspect, is the real truth.
If you did not care you would not have posted "that no one cares."
In fact, they must indeed, because the author of the book was immediately attacked. The website manager was personally attacked - no connection with the facts.
And the Olde Syn Conference has always lied about their origins.
More to follow - for those who do not care.
No, it's that I truly don't care about Walther one way or the other. I tried reading "Law and Gospel" and (like a fair number of people, I suspect) quickly got bored with the repetitious nature of the book and stopped reading it. Walther is just a name from the past to me. I just think it's interesting that no matter how someone responds to your posts, you spin it in such a way as to make yourself look relevant to the discussion instead of someone stuck out in podunk country in Arkansas blogging away to fill up his empty life.
Post a Comment